Type 1 Diabetes MellitusNCT02604524
Reducing Risks and Improving Glucose Control During Extended Exercise in Youth With T1DM: The AP Ski Camp
A study testing Sensor Augmented Pump Therapy in people with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Daniel Chernavvsky, MD, CRC at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The biggest challenges for glycemic control during the day time involve meals and exercise variations, which are impacted by age, fitness level, duration, intensity and history of exercise. Meal variability has the benefit that meals are typically announced and quantified. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 10 to 25 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
- What is being tested?
- Sensor Augmented Pump Therapy
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 32 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Jan 2016to Apr 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 10 to 25 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Inclusion Criteria: To be eligible for the study, a subject must meet the following:
- Criteria for documented hyperglycemia (at least 1 must be met):
- Clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes (C-peptide levels and antibody determinations are not required)
- The diagnosis of type 1 diabetes is based on the investigator's judgment
- Criteria for requiring insulin at diagnosis (both criteria must be met):
- Daily insulin therapy for ≥ 12 months
- Insulin pump therapy for ≥ 3 months
- Age 10 - 25 years
- Avoidance of acetaminophen-containing medications (i.e. Tylenol) while wearing the continuous glucose monitor.
- Willingness to wear a continuous glucose sensor and physiological monitor for the duration of the study
- Female subjects who are sexually active must be on acceptable method of contraception (e.g. oral contraceptive pill, diaphragm, IUD)
Exclusion Criteria: The presence of any of the following is an exclusion for the study:
- Diabetic ketoacidosis in the past 6 months
- Hypoglycemic seizure or loss of consciousness in the past 6 months
- History of seizure disorder (except for hypoglycemic seizure)
- History of any heart disease including coronary artery disease, heart failure, or arrhythmias
- History of altitude sickness
- Chronic pulmonary conditions that could impair oxygenation
- Cystic fibrosis
- Current use of oral glucocorticoids, beta-blockers or other medications, which in the judgment of the investigator would be a contraindication to participation in the study.
- History of ongoing renal disease (other than microalbuminuria).
- Subjects requiring intermediate or long-acting insulin (such as NPH, Detemir or Glargine).
- Subjects requiring other anti-diabetic medications other than insulin (oral or injectable).
- Pregnancy
- Sexually active females who do not practice acceptable contraceptive methods to prevent pregnancy.
- Presence of a febrile illness within 24 hours of start ski camp or acetaminophen use while wearing the CGM. The camp study subject will not participate in the trial if these conditions are met.
- Medical or psychiatric condition that in the judgment of the investigator might interfere with the completion of the protocol such as:
- Inpatient psychiatric treatment in the past 6 months
- Uncontrolled adrenal insufficiency
- Alcohol abuse
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
University of Colorado, Denver, Barbara Davis Center
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903
About this study
The biggest challenges for glycemic control during the day time involve meals and exercise variations, which are impacted by age, fitness level, duration, intensity and history of exercise. Meal variability has the benefit that meals are typically announced and quantified. Glucose control around exercise, on the other hand, is more complicated if the patient doesn't announce a change in activity level.
Read the detailed description
The object of this study is to evaluate the Closed-Loop Control (CLC) in an environment where muscle glycogen is systematically depleted, glucose uptake systematically increased, and meal sizes are naturally larger than normal: a week of camp at high altitude, with the concomitant variable of oxygen consumption that this environment involves; during the winter, that will expose and challenge the different components of the system during cold temperatures, and with twice daily practice of physical activity designed to deplete glycogen reserves such as skiing.
This proposal aims to demonstrate the superiority of the CLC, also known as Artificial Pancreas (AP), compared to the state-of-the art system available on the market: Sensor-augmented pump (SAP). This system has shown to diminish hypoglycemic events by setting the alarms on the continues glucose monitor (CGM) and taken action, such as performing self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) and treating if it is confirm to be low.
- Conditions
- Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
- Being tested
- Closed-Loop Control, Sensor Augmented Pump Therapy
- Keywords
- Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM), Artificial Pancreas (AP), Sensor-Augmented Pump (SAP) Therapy, Closed Loop Control, Insulin Pump, Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM)
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Lymphoproliferative Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Closed-Loop ControlDevice
Also called CLC
Subjects will use the CLC during 5 nights/6 days at a ski camp.
Sensor Augmented Pump TherapyOther
Also called SAP
Subjects using their personal pumps with study CGM.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Closed-Loop Control (CLC) System | Experimental | Subjects will use the Closed-Loop Control system in an attempt to maintain blood glucose in a certain range during the day and at night during the trial. Receives: Device: Closed-Loop Control |
| Sensor Augmented Pump Therapy Group | Placebo comparator | Subjects will manage their own glucose levels during the trial. Receives: Other: Sensor Augmented Pump Therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time in range when using closed-loop compared with SAP.
Measured: 120-144 hours
Secondary outcomes (1)
Reduction of hypoglycemia episodes when using closed-loop
assessed by the number of hypoglycemia treatments were needed for each group
Measured: 120-144 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Nov 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2016
- Primary completionApr 2016
- Study completionApr 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Type 1 Diabetes MellitusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Daniel Chernavvsky, MD, CRC
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), DexCom, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Daniel Chernavvsky, MD, CRC, University of Virginia
- Investigators
- Daniel R. Chernavvsky, MD, CRC, Principal investigator, University of Virginia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02604524
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 18529
- Other IDs
- DP3DK106826-01
- Status last verified
- Nov 2017
- First submitted
- 6 Nov 2015
- Last updated
- 19 Sep 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: undetermined
Publications
Breton MD, Chernavvsky DR, Forlenza GP, DeBoer MD, Robic J, Wadwa RP, Messer LH, Kovatchev BP, Maahs DM. Closed-Loop Control During Intense Prolonged Outdoor Exercise in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: The Artificial Pancreas Ski Study. Diabetes Care. 2017 Dec;40(12):1644-1650. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0883. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
PubMed 28855239
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Sep 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Reducing Risks and Improving Glucose Control During Extended Exercise in Youth With T1DM: The AP Ski Camp
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02604524
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 18529
- Conditions
- Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
- Keywords
- Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM), Artificial Pancreas (AP), Sensor-Augmented Pump (SAP) Therapy, Closed Loop Control, Insulin Pump, Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM)
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Daniel Chernavvsky, MD, CRCUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), DexCom, Inc.
- Study start
- Jan 2016
- Primary completion
- Apr 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Nov 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The biggest challenges for glycemic control during the day time involve meals and exercise variations, which are impacted by age, fitness level, duration, intensity and history of exercise. Meal variability has the benefit that meals are typically announced and quantified. Glucose control around exercise, on the other hand, is more complicated if the patient doesn't announce a change in activity level.
Detailed description
The object of this study is to evaluate the Closed-Loop Control (CLC) in an environment where muscle glycogen is systematically depleted, glucose uptake systematically increased, and meal sizes are naturally larger than normal: a week of camp at high altitude, with the concomitant variable of oxygen consumption that this environment involves; during the winter, that will expose and challenge the different components of the system during cold temperatures, and with twice daily practice of physical activity designed to deplete glycogen reserves such as skiing.
This proposal aims to demonstrate the superiority of the CLC, also known as Artificial Pancreas (AP), compared to the state-of-the art system available on the market: Sensor-augmented pump (SAP). This system has shown to diminish hypoglycemic events by setting the alarms on the continues glucose monitor (CGM) and taken action, such as performing self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) and treating if it is confirm to be low.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Closed-Loop Control (CLC) System | Experimental | Device: Closed-Loop ControlSubjects will use the Closed-Loop Control system in an attempt to maintain blood glucose in a certain range during the day and at night during the trial. |
| Sensor Augmented Pump Therapy Group | Placebo comparator | Other: Sensor Augmented Pump TherapySubjects will manage their own glucose levels during the trial. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 10 to 25 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Closed-Loop ControlAlso: CLCSubjects will use the CLC during 5 nights/6 days at a ski camp. | Device | Closed-Loop Control (CLC) System |
| Sensor Augmented Pump TherapyAlso: SAPSubjects using their personal pumps with study CGM. | Other | Sensor Augmented Pump Therapy Group |
Primary outcome
Time in range when using closed-loop compared with SAP.
Time frame: 120-144 hours
1 secondary outcome
Reduction of hypoglycemia episodes when using closed-loop
Time frame: 120-144 hours
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Sep 2018.
- Results publication: PubMed 28855239Breton MD, Chernavvsky DR, Forlenza GP, DeBoer MD, Robic J, Wadwa RP, Messer LH, Kovatchev BP, Maahs DM. Closed-Loop Control During Intense Prolonged Outdoor Exercise in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: The Artificial Pancreas Ski Study. Diabetes Care. 2017 Dec;40(12):1644-1650. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0883. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. undetermined
Related trials for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC)
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Active, not recruitingObservational study
EFFECT OF HYBRID CLOSED-LOOP SYSTEMS ON CARDIOVASCULAR MARKERS IN TYPE 1 DIABETES.
Type 1 Diabetes
RecruitingPhase 2
Study to Assess the Effects of ALN-ANG3 in Adult Participants With Diabetic Kidney Disease
Diabetic Kidney Disease (DKD)
Active, not recruiting
Effect of the Thrive AI Health App on Lifestyle Behaviors and Quality of Life
Diabetes Type 2, Overweight or Obesity
Recruiting
Insulin-Mediated Glucose Uptake and Organ Perfusion Assessed by Total-Body PET During GIP and GLP-1 Infusion
Type 2 Diabetes, Healhty
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Daniel R. Chernavvsky, MD, CRC principal investigator
University of Virginia
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Sensor Augmented Pump Therapy in people with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Daniel Chernavvsky, MD, CRC at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time in range when using closed-loop compared with SAP. (time frame: 120-144 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02604524, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2018; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 28 Oct 2026.