Erythrocyte TransfusionPhase 3BELIEVENCT02604433
An Efficacy and Safety Study of Luspatercept (ACE-536) Versus Placebo in Adults Who Require Regular Red Blood Cell Transfusions Due to Beta (β) Thalassemia
A Phase 3 study testing Luspatercept in people with Erythrocyte Transfusion and Beta-Thalassemia, run by Celgene at 76 sites in 15 countries.
Trial summary
This is a Phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to determine the efficacy and safety of luspatercept (ACE-536) plus Best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo plus BSC in adults who require regular red blood cell transfusion due to (β)-thalassemia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Erythrocyte Transfusion, Beta-Thalassemia
- What is being tested?
- Luspatercept
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 336 participants
- Where
- 76 sitesin 15 countries
- Study dates
- 2 May 2016to 5 Jan 2021
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects must satisfy the following criteria to be enrolled in the study:
- Male or female, ≥18 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent document (ICF).
- Subject must understand and voluntarily sign an Inform Consent Form prior to any study-related assessments/procedures being conducted.
- Subject is willing and able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements.
- Documented diagnosis of β-thalassemia or Hemoglobin E/β-thalassemia. (β-thalassemia with mutation and/or multiplication of alpha globin is allowed).
- Regularly transfused, defined as: 6-20 Red Blood Cell (RBC) units* in the 24 weeks prior to randomization and no transfusion-free period for ≥ 35 days during that period.
Show all 15Show fewer
- Sites who prescribe transfusions and have the transfusion records only in volumes should use for conversion of volume to units the below criteria, in order to obtain number of units within the last 24 weeks to assess the eligibility: 1 unit in this protocol refers to a quantity of packed RBCs approximately 200-350 mL. (i) sites who use transfusion bags within this range, or ≥ 350 mL, the conversion in units should be done by dividing the volume transfused to the patient by 350 mL, (ii) sites who use transfusion bags < 200 mL, the conversion in units should be done by dividing the volume transfused to the patient by 200 mL.
- Performance status: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0 or 1.
- A female of childbearing potential (FCBP) for this study is defined as a female who: 1) has achieved menarche at some point, 2) has not undergone a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy or 3) has not been naturally postmenopausal (amenorrhea following cancer therapy does not rule out childbearing potential) for at least 24 consecutive months (ie, has had menses at any time in the preceding 24 consecutive months). FCBP participating in the study must:
- Have two negative pregnancy tests as verified by the Investigator prior to starting study therapy. She must agree to ongoing pregnancy testing during the course of the study, and after end of study treatment. This applies even if the subject practices true abstinence ** from heterosexual contact.
- Either commit to true abstinence from heterosexual contact (which must be reviewed on a monthly basis and source documented) If a FCBP engages in sexual activity that may result in a pregnancy, she must agree to use, and be able to comply with, effective* contraception without interruption, 28 days prior to starting investigational product, during the study therapy (including dose interruptions), and for 12 weeks (approximately five times the mean terminal half-life of luspatercept based on multiple-dose Pharmacokinetic PK) data) after discontinuation of study therapy.
- True abstinence is acceptable when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject. [Periodic abstinence (eg, calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods) and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception.] *** Agreement to use highly effective methods of contraception that alone or in combination result in a failure rate of a Pearl index of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly throughout the course of the study.
- Such methods include: Combined (estrogen and progesterone/progestin containing) hormonal contraception: Oral; Intravaginal; Transdermal; Progestogen/progestin only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation: Oral; Injectable hormonal contraception; Implantable hormonal contraception; Placement of an intrauterine device (IUD); Placement of an intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS); Bilateral tubal occlusion; Vasectomized partner; Sexual Abstinence.
- Male subjects must:
- Practice true abstinence or agree to use a condom during sexual contact with a pregnant female or a female of childbearing potential while participating in the study, during dose interruptions and for at least 12 weeks (approximately five times the mean terminal half-life of luspatercept based on multiple-dose PK data) following investigational product discontinuation, even if he has undergone a successful vasectomy.
Who cannot join
- The presence of any of the following will exclude a subject from enrollment:
- Any significant medical condition, laboratory abnormality, or psychiatric illness that would prevent the subject from participating in the study.
- Any condition including the presence of laboratory abnormalities, which places the subject at unacceptable risk if he/she were to participate in the study.
- Any condition that confounds the ability to interpret data from the study.
- A diagnosis of Hemoglobin S/β-thalassemia or alpha (α)-thalassemia (eg, Hemoglobin H);
- Evidence of active hepatitis C (HCV) infection as demonstrated by a positive HCV-RNA test of sufficient sensitivity, or active infectious hepatitis B as demonstrated by the presence of HBsAg and/or HBVDNA-positive,, or known positive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
Show all 32Show fewer
- Note: Subjects receiving antiviral therapies should have 2 negative HCVRNA tests 3 months apart.(ie, one test at the end of the antiviral therapy and a second test 3 months following the first test).
- Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) or stroke requiring medical intervention ≤ 24 weeks prior to randomization.
- Use of chronic anticoagulant therapy is excluded, unless the treatment stopped at least 28 days prior to randomization. Anticoagulant therapies used for prophylaxis for surgery or high risk procedures as well as low Molecular Weight (LMW) heparin for superficial venous thrombosis and chronic aspirin are allowed.
- Platelet count > 1000 x 109/L
- Poorly controlled diabetes mellitus within 24 weeks prior to randomization as defined by short term (eg, hyperosmolar or ketoacidotic crisis) and/or history of diabetic cardiovascular complications (eg, stroke or myocardial infarction).
- Treatment with another investigational drug or device ≤ 28 days prior to randomization.
- Prior exposure to sotatercept (ACE-011) or luspatercept (ACE-536).
- Use of an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) ≤ 24 weeks prior to randomization.
- Iron chelation therapy, if initiated ≤ 24 weeks prior to randomization (allowed if initiated > 24 weeks before or during treatment).
- Hydroxyurea treatment ≤ 24 weeks prior to randomization.
- Pregnant or lactating females.
- Uncontrolled hypertension. Controlled hypertension for this protocol is considered ≤ Grade 1 according to NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 (current active minor version).
- Major organ damage, including:
- Liver disease with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 3 x the upper limit of normal (ULN) or history of evidence of cirrhosis;
- Heart disease, heart failure as classified by the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification 3 or higher, or significant arrhythmia requiring treatment, or recent myocardial infarction within 6 months of randomization.
- Lung disease, including pulmonary fibrosis or pulmonary hypertension which are clinically significant ie, ≥ Grade 3 NCI CTCAE version 4.0 (current active minor version).
- Creatinine clearance < 60 mL/min (per Cockroft-Gault formula).
- Proteinuria ≥ Grade 3 according to NCI CTCAE version 4.0 (current active minor version).
- Chronic systemic glucocorticoids ≤ 12 weeks prior to randomization (physiologic replacement therapy for adrenal insufficiency is allowed). Single day glucocorticoid treatment (eg, for prevention or treatment of transfusion reactions, is allowed).
- Major surgery ≤ 12 weeks prior to randomization (subjects must have completely recovered from any previous surgery prior to randomization).
- History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions or hypersensitivity to recombinant proteins or excipients in the investigational product (see Investigator Brochure).
- Cytotoxic agents, immunosuppressants ≤ 28 days prior to randomization (ie, antithymocite globulin (ATG) or cyclosporine)
- History of malignancy with the exception of:
- Curatively resected nonmelanoma skin cancer.
- Curatively treated cervical carcinoma in situ.
- Other solid tumor with no known active disease in the opinion of the investigator.
Trial locations and contacts
76 sites in 15 countries.
76 sites in 15 countries
Italy10 sites
Presidio Ospedaliero Antonio Perrino
Brindisi, 72100
Universita degli Studi di Cagliari - ASL8
Cagliari, 09121
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara - Arcispedale Sant'Anna
Ferrara, 44124
Ente Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera - Centro della Microcitemia e delle Anemie Congenite
Genoa, 16128
Fondazione Ca Granda IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore
Milan, 20122
AORN A Cardarelli
Naples, 80131
Seconda Universita Degli Studi Di Napoli
Naples, 80131
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria S. Luigi Gonzaga
Orbassano, 10043
Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello
Palermo, 90146
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona
Verona, 37134
Turkey (Türkiye)8 sites
Acibadem Adana Hospital
Adana, 01130
Cukurova University Medical Faculty Balcali Hospital
Adana, 01330
Local Institution - 524
Adana, 01330
Hacettepe Universitesi
Ankara, 01660
Antalya Egitim Arastirma
Antalya, 07100
Istanbul Universitesi Istanbul Tip Fakultesi Hastanesi
Istanbul, 34093
Ege Universitesi Tip Fakultesi Hastanesi
Izmir, 35100
Mersin University Medical Faculty
Mersin, 33343
Greece7 sites
Laiko General Hospital of Athens
Ampelokipi - Athens, 115 26
Local Institution - 405
Ampelokipi - Athens, 115 26
General Children's Hospital "Agia Sophia"
Athens, 115 27
General Hospital Georgios Gennimatas of Athens
Athens, 11527
University General Hospital of Patras
Rio Patras, 26500
Hippokration Hospital
Thessaloniki, 54642
Local Institution - 404
Thessaloniki, 54642
Israel7 sites
Soroka University Medical Centre
Beersheba, 84101
Rambam Health Corporation
Haifa, 3109601
HaEmek Medical Center
Haïfa (Afula), 18101
Shaare Zedek Medical Center
Jerusalem, 91031
Hadassah Medical Center
Jerusalem, 91120
Galilee Medical Center
Nahariya, 22100
Rabin Medical Center
Petah Tikva, 49100
Malaysia7 sites
Hospital Sultanah Bahiyah
Alor Star, Kedah, 05460
Hospital Pulau Pinang c/o Penang Medical College
George Town, 10990
Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun
Ipoh, Perak, 30990
Hospital Sultanah Aminah
Johor Bahru, Johor, 80100
Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, 88586
University Malaya Medical Centre
Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, 59100
Hospital Umum Sarawak
Kuching, Sarawak, 93586
United States6 sites
Boston Children's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Ann and Robert H Lurie Childrens Hospital of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Children's Hospital of Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, 90027
Weill Cornell Medical College
New York, New York, 10065
Children's Hospital and Research Center at Oakland
Oakland, California, 94609
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Australia6 sites
Royal Adelaide Hospital Institute of Medical and Veterinary Science
Adelaide, South Australia, 5000
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Camperdown, 2050
Monash Medical Centre
Clayton, Victoria, 3168
Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital
Nedlands, Western Australia, 6009
Prince of Wales Hospital
Randwick, New South Wales, 2031
Mater Hospital Brisbane
South Brisbane, Queensland, 4101
United Kingdom5 sites
St James University Hospital
Leeds, LS9 7TF
Barts Health NHS Trust - The Royal London Hospital
London, E1 1BB
Whittington Hospital
London, N19 5NF
University College Hospital Trust
London Bloomsbury, WC1E 6AU
Manchester Royal Infirmary
Manchester, M13 9WL
France4 sites
Hopital Henri Mondor
Créteil, 94010
GH de Institut Catholique St. VincentHématologie
Lille, 59000
Hopitaux de La Timone
Marseille, 13385
Hospital of Necker
Paris, 75015
Taiwan4 sites
Changhua Christian Hospital
Changhua, 500
Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital
Kaohsiung City, 807
China Medical University Hospital
Taichung, 40447
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, Zhongzheng Dist., 10002
Tunisia4 sites
University Hospital Farhat Hached
Sousse, 4031
Bone Marrow Transplant Center
Tunis, 1006
Aziza Othmana Hospital
Tunis, 1008
Military Hospital of Tunis
Tunis, 1089
Bulgaria3 sites
University Mulitiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment Sveti Georgi EAD
Plovdiv, 4002
Specialized Hospital for Active Treatment of Haematological Diseases - Sofia
Sofia, 1756
Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment Sveta Marina EAD
Varna, 9010
Thailand3 sites
Chulalongkorn University Faculty of Medicine - King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital
Bangkok, 10330
Siriraj Hospital Mahidol University
Bangkok, 10700
Chiang Mai University - Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital
Chiang Mai, 50200
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Multicenter Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Luspatercept (ACE-536) in Adults With Transfusion Dependent Beta (B)-Thalassemia
This is a Phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to determine the efficacy and safety of luspatercept (ACE-536) plus Best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo plus BSC in adults who require regular red blood cell transfusion due to (β)-thalassemia.
The study is divided into the following periods:
- Historical Period,
- Screening/Run-in Period,
- Double-blind Treatment Period (48 weeks),
- Double-blind Long-term Treatment Period, (at the investigator's discretion an additional 48 weeks),
- Open-Label Phase post unblinding and upon Data Monitoring Committee positive recommendation
- Post-treatment Follow-up Period
- Conditions
- Erythrocyte Transfusion, Beta-Thalassemia
- Being tested
- Luspatercept, Placebo
- Keywords
- ACE-536, Safety, Efficacy, Placebo, Red Blood Cell Transfusions, Beta -Thalassemia
- Medical subject headings
- beta-Thalassemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LuspaterceptDrug
Also called ACE-536
Subjects will start with luspatercept at 1 mg/kg dose level.
PlaceboOther
Placebo, Subcutaneous, every 21 days.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Luspatercept (ACE-536) plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) | Experimental | Luspatercept, subcutaneous(ly) (SC) once every 21 days Receives: Drug: Luspatercept |
| Placebo plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) | Placebo comparator | normal saline solution subcutaneous(ly) (SC) once every 21 days Receives: Other: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Erythroid Response - Week 13 to Week 24
Erythroid Response was defined as red blood cell (RBC) transfusion burden reduction from baseline ≥ 33% with a reduction of at least 2 units during Week 13 - 24 compared to the 12-week interval on or prior to Dose 1 Day 1.
Measured: Baseline: Day -83 to Day 1; Treatment: Weeks 13 to Week 24
Secondary outcomes (27)
Percentage Of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 33% Reduction From Baseline in Transfusion Burden - Week 37 to Week 48
Percentage of participants who achieved a red blood cell (RBC) transfusion burden reduction from baseline ≥ 33% with a reduction of at least 2 units during Weeks 37 - 48 compared to the 12-week interval on or prior to Dose 1 Day 1.
Measured: Baseline: Day -83 to Day 1; Treatment: Weeks 37 to Week 48
Percentage Of Participants Who Achieve ≥ 50% Reduction From Baseline in Transfusion Burden - Week 13 to Week 24
Percentage of participants who achieved a red blood cell (RBC) transfusion burden reduction from baseline ≥ 50% with a reduction of at least 2 units during Weeks 13 - 24 compared to the 12-week interval on or prior to Dose 1 Day 1.
Measured: Baseline: Day -83 to Day 1; Treatment: Weeks 13 to Week 24
Percentage Of Participants Who Achieve ≥ 50% Reduction From Baseline in Transfusion Burden - Week 37 to Week 48
Percentage of participants who achieved a red blood cell (RBC) transfusion burden reduction from baseline ≥ 50% with a reduction of at least 2 units during Week 37 to Week 48 compared to the 12-week interval on or prior to Dose 1 Day 1.
Measured: Baseline: Day -83 to Day 1; Treatment: Week 37 to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Transfusion Burden - Week 13 to Week 24
Baseline was defined as the total number of Red Blood Cells (RBC) units transfused during the 12-week interval on or prior to Dose 1 Day 1. This is compared to the total number of RBC units transfused during the 12-week interval from treatment weeks 13-24.
Measured: Baseline: Day -83 to Day 1; Treatment: Weeks 13 to Week 24
Mean Change From Baseline In Liver Iron Concentration (LIC) At Week 48
Baseline was defined as the last value on or before the first dose of study drug was administered; if multiple values were present for the same date, the average of these values was used. If a participant had 1 postbaseline assessment, it was used as the Week 48 value. If a participant had multiple postbaseline assessments, the last one was used as the Week 48 value. The value of LIC was collected by magnetic resonance imaging. Participants with a LIC value > 43 mg/g were not included in the analysis.
Measured: Baseline: Week -12 to Day -1; Treatment: Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline In Mean Daily Dose Of Iron Chelation Therapies (ICT) At Week 48
Three different types of Iron Chelation Therapy (ICT) were analyzed: 1. Deferasirox 2. Deferiprone 3. Deferoxamine Mesilate/Deferoxamine The baseline mean daily dose was calculated using the ICT dosage during the 12 weeks prior to first study drug administration and the postbaseline mean daily dose was calculated during the last 12 weeks of the 48-week double-blind Treatment Period or the last 12 weeks of the study treatment for early discontinued participants.
Measured: Baseline: Day -83 to Day 1; Treatment: Week 37 to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline In Mean Serum Ferritin At Week 48
For each participant, the baseline mean serum ferritin level was calculated during the 12 weeks prior to first study drug administration. The postbaseline mean serum ferritin level was calculated during the last 12 weeks of the 48-week double-blind Treatment Period or last 12 weeks of study treatment, if discontinued early. The change was calculated as the difference of post baseline mean serum ferritin level and baseline mean serum ferritin level.
Measured: Baseline: Day -83 to Day 1; Treatment: Week 37 to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline In Total Hip And Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) At Week 48
For BMD, the lumbar spine and total hip were measured at baseline and 48 weeks by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Baseline was defined as the last value on or before the first dose of study drug is administered; if multiple values are present for the same date, the average of these values was used. If during the 48 week double-blinded treatment period, a participant has only one assessment, it is counted as 'Week 48' visit; if a participant has multiple assessments, the last one is used as 'Week 48' visit. The analysis was done on the population that had at least 2 measurements.
Measured: Baseline: Day 1; Treatment: Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline In Myocardial Iron At Week 48
Myocardial Iron levels were measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), using MRI parameter T2* (Unit: ms). T2* values correlates with heart failure (HF) risk (e.g. T2*<6ms: high HF risk).
Measured: Baseline: Day 1; Treatment: Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in the Transfusion-dependent Quality of Life (TranQol) Questionnaire At Week 24
The TranQol is a self-administered quality of life tool developed for beta-thalassemia patients. The adult self-report version used in this study, includes 36 questions assessed on a 5-point response, that are grouped into 5 domains (Physical Health, Emotional Health, Sexual Health, Family Functioning, School/Career Functioning). Scores are calculated according to specific scoring algorithms developed by the authors. Both individual domains score and the total score range from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Total Score and Physical Health domain score are reported. Positive change from baseline values indicate improvement.
Measured: Baseline: 4 weeks prior to Day 1; Treatment: Week 24
Mean Change From Baseline in the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Questionnaire At Weeks 24
The SF-36 (version 2) is a generic, self-administered instrument consisting of 8 multi-item scales that assess 8 health domains. The raw score for each health domain is transformed into a 0 (worst) to 100 (best) domain score. The 0-100 scale score for each health domain is further converted to normbased scores using a T-score transformation, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Higher norm-based T-scores indicate better heath/QoL. The domains/summaries reported are: 1. Physical Functioning (Range of possible T-scores is 19.26 - 57.54) 2. General Health (Range of possible T-scores is 18.95 - 66.50) 3. Physical Component summary (PCS) (Range of possible T-scores is 5.02 - 79.78). Positive change from baseline values indicate improvement.
Measured: Baseline: 4 weeks prior to Day 1; Treatment: Weeks 24
Number of Participants Who Utilized Healthcare Resources During Study
Number of participants who had any of the following types of Healthcare Resource Utilization (HRU): - a doctor office visit (non-study scheduled) - an emergency department visit - a hospitalization
Measured: From informed consent signing (up to 12 weeks before start of treatment) to end of treatment (up to approximately 227 weeks)
Number of Days Spent in Higher Care Hospital Units
Types of hospitals units considered to be 'higher care' are: - Intensive Care Unit - Coronary Care Unit
Measured: From informed consent signing (up to 12 weeks before start of treatment) to end of treatment (up to approximately 227 weeks)
Percentage Of Participants Who Were Transfusion Independent For ≥ 8 Weeks During Treatment
Transfusion independence was defined as the absence of any transfusion during any consecutive "rolling" 8-week time interval within the treatment period, i.e, Days 1 to 56, Days 2 to 57 and so on.
Measured: From first dose through 3 weeks post last dose (up to approximately 218 weeks)
Duration of Reduction in Transfusion Burden
Responders were defined as subjects who achieved ≥ 33% reduction or ≥ 50% reduction in Red Blood Cells Transfusion (RBC-T) burden from baseline with a reduction of at least 2 RBC units during any rolling 12-week interval. The duration of reduction is calculated as Last Day of Response - First day of response +1
Measured: From first dose to end of study treatment (up to approximately 215 weeks)
Longest Duration of Transfusion Independence
Transfusion independence was defined as the absence of any transfusion during any consecutive "rolling" 8-week time interval within the treatment period, ie, Days 1 to 56, Days 2 to 57 and so on. Longest duration of transfusion independence was estimated based on Kaplan-Meier model.
Measured: From first dose through 3 weeks post last dose (up to approximately 218 weeks)
Time to Erythroid Response
Time to erythroid response was defined as the time from first dose of the study drug to first erythroid response. This is reported for participants with a ≥ 33% reduction from baseline in RBC transfusion burden (with a reduction of at least 2 units) for any 12-week interval., as well as participants with a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in RBC transfusion burden (with a reduction of at least 2 units) for any 12-week interval.
Measured: From first dose to 48 weeks following first dose
Post-Baseline Transfusion Event Frequency
The number of transfusion events after start of study treatment were evaluated. For the definition of transfusion events, if multiple transfusions happen on the same date, they are counted as one event; if multiple transfusions happen on two consecutive dates, they are counted as one event; if multiple transfusions happen on three consecutive dates, they are counted as two events. Results are presented in 24-week intervals, up to 96 weeks after start of study treatment
Measured: From first dose through 3 weeks post last dose (up to approximately 218 weeks)
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Apparent Clearance (CL/F)
Measured: Blood serum samples taken pre-dose and on Days 1, 22, 64, 85, 106, 127, 169, 211, 253, 295, 337
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Apparent Volume of Distribution of the Central Compartment (V1/F)
Measured: Blood serum samples taken pre-dose and on Days 1, 22, 64, 85, 106, 127, 169, 211, 253, 295, 337
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Elimination Half-life (t1/2)
Measured: Blood serum samples taken pre-dose and on Days 1, 22, 64, 85, 106, 127, 169, 211, 253, 295, 337
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax)
Measured: Blood serum samples taken pre-dose and on Days 1, 22, 64, 85, 106, 127, 169, 211, 253, 295, 337
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Maximum Concentration for the Starting Dose (Cmax)
Measured: Blood serum samples taken pre-dose and on Days 1, 22, 64, 85, 106, 127, 169, 211, 253, 295, 337
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Maximum Concentration at Steady State for the Starting Dose (Cmax,ss)
Measured: Blood serum samples taken pre-dose and on Days 1, 22, 64, 85, 106, 127, 169, 211, 253, 295, 337
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve at Steady State for the Starting Dose (AUCss)
Measured: Blood serum samples taken pre-dose and on Days 1, 22, 64, 85, 106, 127, 169, 211, 253, 295, 337
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
An AE is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen during the course of a study. A serious AE is any AE occurring at any dose that - Results in death - Is life-threatening - Requires or prolongs existing inpatient hospitalization - Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity - Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect - Constitutes an important medical event. The Investigator assessed the relationship of each AE to study drug and graded the severity according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 4.03): - Grade 1 = Mild - Grade 2 = Moderate (some limitation in activity; no/minimal medical intervention) - Grade 3 = Severe (limitation in activity; medical intervention required) - Grade 4 = Life-threatening - Grade 5 = Death
Measured: From first dose to 90 days following last dose (up to approximately 52 months)
Participants With Pre-Existing and/or Treatment-Emergent Antidrug Antibodies (ADA)
Number of participants with positive ADA prior to taking study drug and/or during study. A participant was counted as "treatment-emergent" if there was a positive post-baseline sample while the baseline sample was ADA negative, or there was a positive post-baseline sample with a titer ≥ 4-fold of the baseline titer while the baseline sample was ADA positive. A participant was counted as "preexisting" if the baseline sample was ADA positive and the participant was not qualified for "treatment-emergent."
Measured: Timeframe: pre-dose, Day 1, Days 22, 64, 106, 148, 232, 316
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Nov 2015 (estimated)
- Study start2 May 2016
- Primary completion5 Jan 2021
- Study completion5 Jan 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Erythrocyte TransfusionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by CelgeneThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 336 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Celgene
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Acceleron Pharma, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ USA
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, Study director, Bristol-Myers Squibb
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02604433
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ACE-536-B-THAL-001
- Acronym
- BELIEVE
- Status last verified
- Mar 2023
- First submitted
- 21 Oct 2015
- Last updated
- 18 Apr 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Porter J. Beyond transfusion therapy: new therapies in thalassemia including drugs, alternate donor transplant, and gene therapy. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2018 Nov 30;2018(1):361-370. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2018.1.361.
PubMed 30504333Piga A, Perrotta S, Gamberini MR, Voskaridou E, Melpignano A, Filosa A, Caruso V, Pietrangelo A, Longo F, Tartaglione I, Borgna-Pignatti C, Zhang X, Laadem A, Sherman ML, Attie KM. Luspatercept improves hemoglobin levels and blood transfusion requirements in a study of patients with beta-thalassemia. Blood. 2019 Mar 21;133(12):1279-1289. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-10-879247. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
PubMed 30617198Cappellini MD, Viprakasit V, Georgiev P, Coates TD, Origa R, Khelif A, Liew HK, Tantiworawit A, Chew LP, Khalil A, Ho PJ, Kuo KHM, Holot N, Perin M, Giuseppi AC, Kuo WL, Lai Y, Medlin LF, Bueno LM, Kattamis A, Taher AT. Long-term efficacy and safety of luspatercept for the treatment of anaemia in patients with transfusion-dependent beta-thalassaemia (BELIEVE): final results from a phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet Haematol. 2025 Mar;12(3):e180-e189. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(24)00376-4. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
PubMed 39947215Garbowski MW, Ugidos M, Risueno A, Shetty JK, Schwickart M, Hermine O, Porter JB, Thakurta A, Vodala S. Luspatercept stimulates erythropoiesis, increases iron utilization, and redistributes body iron in transfusion-dependent thalassemia. Am J Hematol. 2024 Feb;99(2):182-192. doi: 10.1002/ajh.27102. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
PubMed 37782758Denton CC, Vodala S, Veluswamy S, Hofstra TC, Coates TD, Wood JC. Splenic iron decreases without change in volume or liver parameters during luspatercept therapy. Blood. 2023 Nov 30;142(22):1932-1934. doi: 10.1182/blood.2023021839.
PubMed 37704579Cappellini MD, Taher AT. The use of luspatercept for thalassemia in adults. Blood Adv. 2021 Jan 12;5(1):326-333. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002725.
PubMed 33570654Cappellini MD, Viprakasit V, Taher AT, Georgiev P, Kuo KHM, Coates T, Voskaridou E, Liew HK, Pazgal-Kobrowski I, Forni GL, Perrotta S, Khelif A, Lal A, Kattamis A, Vlachaki E, Origa R, Aydinok Y, Bejaoui M, Ho PJ, Chew LP, Bee PC, Lim SM, Lu MY, Tantiworawit A, Ganeva P, Gercheva L, Shah F, Neufeld EJ, Thompson A, Laadem A, Shetty JK, Zou J, Zhang J, Miteva D, Zinger T, Linde PG, Sherman ML, Hermine O, Porter J, Piga A; BELIEVE Investigators. A Phase 3 Trial of Luspatercept in Patients with Transfusion-Dependent beta-Thalassemia. N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 26;382(13):1219-1231. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910182.
PubMed 32212518
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Apr 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Multicenter Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Luspatercept (ACE-536) in Adults With Transfusion Dependent Beta (B)-Thalassemia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02604433
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BELIEVE / ACE-536-B-THAL-001
- Conditions
- Erythrocyte Transfusion, Beta-Thalassemia
- Keywords
- ACE-536, Safety, Efficacy, Placebo, Red Blood Cell Transfusions, Beta -Thalassemia
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 336 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- CelgeneIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Acceleron Pharma, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ USA
- Study start
- 2 May 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 Jan 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Nov 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 27 Jan 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a Phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to determine the efficacy and safety of luspatercept (ACE-536) plus Best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo plus BSC in adults who require regular red blood cell transfusion due to (β)-thalassemia.
The study is divided into the following periods:
- Historical Period,
- Screening/Run-in Period,
- Double-blind Treatment Period (48 weeks),
- Double-blind Long-term Treatment Period, (at the investigator's discretion an additional 48 weeks),
- Open-Label Phase post unblinding and upon Data Monitoring Committee positive recommendation
- Post-treatment Follow-up Period
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Luspatercept (ACE-536) plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) | Experimental | Drug: LuspaterceptLuspatercept, subcutaneous(ly) (SC) once every 21 days |
| Placebo plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) | Placebo comparator | Other: Placebonormal saline solution subcutaneous(ly) (SC) once every 21 days |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Male or female, ≥18 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent document (ICF).
- Subject must understand and voluntarily sign an Inform Consent Form prior to any study-related assessments/procedures being conducted.
- Subject is willing and able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements.
- Documented diagnosis of β-thalassemia or Hemoglobin E/β-thalassemia. (β-thalassemia with mutation and/or multiplication of alpha globin is allowed).
- Regularly transfused, defined as: 6-20 Red Blood Cell (RBC) units* in the 24 weeks prior to randomization and no transfusion-free period for ≥ 35 days during that period.
Key exclusion criteria (32 listed)
- Any significant medical condition, laboratory abnormality, or psychiatric illness that would prevent the subject from participating in the study.
- Any condition including the presence of laboratory abnormalities, which places the subject at unacceptable risk if he/she were to participate in the study.
- Any condition that confounds the ability to interpret data from the study.
- A diagnosis of Hemoglobin S/β-thalassemia or alpha (α)-thalassemia (eg, Hemoglobin H);
- Evidence of active hepatitis C (HCV) infection as demonstrated by a positive HCV-RNA test of sufficient sensitivity, or active infectious hepatitis B as demonstrated by the presence of HBsAg and/or HBVDNA-positive,, or known positive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LuspaterceptAlso: ACE-536Subjects will start with luspatercept at 1 mg/kg dose level. | Drug | Luspatercept (ACE-536) plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) |
| PlaceboPlacebo, Subcutaneous, every 21 days. | Other | Placebo plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Erythroid Response - Week 13 to Week 24
Time frame: Baseline: Day -83 to Day 1; Treatment: Weeks 13 to Week 24
Erythroid Response was defined as red blood cell (RBC) transfusion burden reduction from baseline ≥ 33% with a reduction of at least 2 units during Week 13 - 24 compared to the 12-week interval on or prior to Dose 1 Day 1.
27 secondary outcomes
Percentage Of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 33% Reduction From Baseline in Transfusion Burden - Week 37 to Week 48
Time frame: Baseline: Day -83 to Day 1; Treatment: Weeks 37 to Week 48
Percentage Of Participants Who Achieve ≥ 50% Reduction From Baseline in Transfusion Burden - Week 13 to Week 24
Time frame: Baseline: Day -83 to Day 1; Treatment: Weeks 13 to Week 24
Percentage Of Participants Who Achieve ≥ 50% Reduction From Baseline in Transfusion Burden - Week 37 to Week 48
Time frame: Baseline: Day -83 to Day 1; Treatment: Week 37 to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Transfusion Burden - Week 13 to Week 24
Time frame: Baseline: Day -83 to Day 1; Treatment: Weeks 13 to Week 24
Mean Change From Baseline In Liver Iron Concentration (LIC) At Week 48
Time frame: Baseline: Week -12 to Day -1; Treatment: Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline In Mean Daily Dose Of Iron Chelation Therapies (ICT) At Week 48
Time frame: Baseline: Day -83 to Day 1; Treatment: Week 37 to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline In Mean Serum Ferritin At Week 48
Time frame: Baseline: Day -83 to Day 1; Treatment: Week 37 to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline In Total Hip And Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) At Week 48
Time frame: Baseline: Day 1; Treatment: Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline In Myocardial Iron At Week 48
Time frame: Baseline: Day 1; Treatment: Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in the Transfusion-dependent Quality of Life (TranQol) Questionnaire At Week 24
Time frame: Baseline: 4 weeks prior to Day 1; Treatment: Week 24
Mean Change From Baseline in the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Questionnaire At Weeks 24
Time frame: Baseline: 4 weeks prior to Day 1; Treatment: Weeks 24
Number of Participants Who Utilized Healthcare Resources During Study
Time frame: From informed consent signing (up to 12 weeks before start of treatment) to end of treatment (up to approximately 227 weeks)
Number of Days Spent in Higher Care Hospital Units
Time frame: From informed consent signing (up to 12 weeks before start of treatment) to end of treatment (up to approximately 227 weeks)
Percentage Of Participants Who Were Transfusion Independent For ≥ 8 Weeks During Treatment
Time frame: From first dose through 3 weeks post last dose (up to approximately 218 weeks)
Duration of Reduction in Transfusion Burden
Time frame: From first dose to end of study treatment (up to approximately 215 weeks)
Longest Duration of Transfusion Independence
Time frame: From first dose through 3 weeks post last dose (up to approximately 218 weeks)
Time to Erythroid Response
Time frame: From first dose to 48 weeks following first dose
Post-Baseline Transfusion Event Frequency
Time frame: From first dose through 3 weeks post last dose (up to approximately 218 weeks)
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Apparent Clearance (CL/F)
Time frame: Blood serum samples taken pre-dose and on Days 1, 22, 64, 85, 106, 127, 169, 211, 253, 295, 337
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Apparent Volume of Distribution of the Central Compartment (V1/F)
Time frame: Blood serum samples taken pre-dose and on Days 1, 22, 64, 85, 106, 127, 169, 211, 253, 295, 337
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Elimination Half-life (t1/2)
Time frame: Blood serum samples taken pre-dose and on Days 1, 22, 64, 85, 106, 127, 169, 211, 253, 295, 337
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax)
Time frame: Blood serum samples taken pre-dose and on Days 1, 22, 64, 85, 106, 127, 169, 211, 253, 295, 337
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Maximum Concentration for the Starting Dose (Cmax)
Time frame: Blood serum samples taken pre-dose and on Days 1, 22, 64, 85, 106, 127, 169, 211, 253, 295, 337
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Maximum Concentration at Steady State for the Starting Dose (Cmax,ss)
Time frame: Blood serum samples taken pre-dose and on Days 1, 22, 64, 85, 106, 127, 169, 211, 253, 295, 337
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve at Steady State for the Starting Dose (AUCss)
Time frame: Blood serum samples taken pre-dose and on Days 1, 22, 64, 85, 106, 127, 169, 211, 253, 295, 337
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
Time frame: From first dose to 90 days following last dose (up to approximately 52 months)
Participants With Pre-Existing and/or Treatment-Emergent Antidrug Antibodies (ADA)
Time frame: Timeframe: pre-dose, Day 1, Days 22, 64, 106, 148, 232, 316
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Apr 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 30504333Porter J. Beyond transfusion therapy: new therapies in thalassemia including drugs, alternate donor transplant, and gene therapy. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2018 Nov 30;2018(1):361-370. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2018.1.361.
- Results publication: PubMed 30617198Piga A, Perrotta S, Gamberini MR, Voskaridou E, Melpignano A, Filosa A, Caruso V, Pietrangelo A, Longo F, Tartaglione I, Borgna-Pignatti C, Zhang X, Laadem A, Sherman ML, Attie KM. Luspatercept improves hemoglobin levels and blood transfusion requirements in a study of patients with beta-thalassemia. Blood. 2019 Mar 21;133(12):1279-1289. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-10-879247. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39947215Cappellini MD, Viprakasit V, Georgiev P, Coates TD, Origa R, Khelif A, Liew HK, Tantiworawit A, Chew LP, Khalil A, Ho PJ, Kuo KHM, Holot N, Perin M, Giuseppi AC, Kuo WL, Lai Y, Medlin LF, Bueno LM, Kattamis A, Taher AT. Long-term efficacy and safety of luspatercept for the treatment of anaemia in patients with transfusion-dependent beta-thalassaemia (BELIEVE): final results from a phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet Haematol. 2025 Mar;12(3):e180-e189. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(24)00376-4. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37782758Garbowski MW, Ugidos M, Risueno A, Shetty JK, Schwickart M, Hermine O, Porter JB, Thakurta A, Vodala S. Luspatercept stimulates erythropoiesis, increases iron utilization, and redistributes body iron in transfusion-dependent thalassemia. Am J Hematol. 2024 Feb;99(2):182-192. doi: 10.1002/ajh.27102. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37704579Denton CC, Vodala S, Veluswamy S, Hofstra TC, Coates TD, Wood JC. Splenic iron decreases without change in volume or liver parameters during luspatercept therapy. Blood. 2023 Nov 30;142(22):1932-1934. doi: 10.1182/blood.2023021839.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33570654Cappellini MD, Taher AT. The use of luspatercept for thalassemia in adults. Blood Adv. 2021 Jan 12;5(1):326-333. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002725.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32212518Cappellini MD, Viprakasit V, Taher AT, Georgiev P, Kuo KHM, Coates T, Voskaridou E, Liew HK, Pazgal-Kobrowski I, Forni GL, Perrotta S, Khelif A, Lal A, Kattamis A, Vlachaki E, Origa R, Aydinok Y, Bejaoui M, Ho PJ, Chew LP, Bee PC, Lim SM, Lu MY, Tantiworawit A, Ganeva P, Gercheva L, Shah F, Neufeld EJ, Thompson A, Laadem A, Shetty JK, Zou J, Zhang J, Miteva D, Zinger T, Linde PG, Sherman ML, Hermine O, Porter J, Piga A; BELIEVE Investigators. A Phase 3 Trial of Luspatercept in Patients with Transfusion-Dependent beta-Thalassemia. N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 26;382(13):1219-1231. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910182.
- BMS Clinical Trial InformationLink provided by the sponsor.
- BMS Clinical Trial Patient RecruitingLink provided by the sponsor.
- FDA Safety Alerts and RecallsLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Erythrocyte Transfusion
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Compare Elritercept With Epoetin Alfa to Treat Anemia in Adults With Lower Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS) Who Need Regular Blood Transfusions
Myelodysplastic Syndrome, Anemia
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Phase 1/2 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Dibotatug (DR-01) in Adults With Bone Marrow Failure Syndromes
Bone Marrow Failure Syndromes, Aplastic Anemias
RecruitingObservational study
First-Line Luspatercept in Transfusion-Dependent Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Neoplasms
Myelodysplastic Neoplasms
Not yet recruiting
Hypoxic Red Blood Cells in Sickle Cell Anemia
Sickle Cell Anaemia, Sickle Cell Anemia Crisis
Recruiting
Blood Transfusion Strategies During Major Surgery
Perioperative Red Blood Cell Transfusion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bristol-Myers Squibb study director
Bristol-Myers Squibb
76 sites in 15 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Luspatercept in people with Erythrocyte Transfusion and Beta-Thalassemia, run by Celgene at 76 sites in 15 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 32 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 76 sites in Italy, Turkey (Türkiye), Greece, Israel, Malaysia and 10 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Jan 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Erythroid Response - Week 13 to Week 24 (time frame: Baseline: Day -83 to Day 1; Treatment: Weeks 13 to Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02604433, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Apr 2023.