AzTrials
AzTrials

Head and Neck NeoplasmsPhase 4NCT02597582

LigaSure Small Jaw® Versus Conventional Neck Dissection in Head and Neck Cancer Patients

A Phase 4 study testing Neck dissection in people with Head and Neck Neoplasms, run by Taichung Veterans General Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this prospective randomized study was to investigate if the LigaSure vessel sealing system can reduce the operation duration and the postoperative drainage amount in patients undergoing neck dissection. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Head and Neck Neoplasms
What is being tested?
Neck dissection
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
41 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
Jan 2014to Oct 2015
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients aged 20 to 80 years scheduled to receive neck dissection due to head and neck cancer

Who cannot join

  • history of coagulation disorders
  • prior radiation to the neck
  • prior neck dissection
  • declined to participate

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Taiwan1 site
  • Taichung Veterans General Hospital

    Taichung, Taiwan, 40705

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Official title: A Prospective Randomized Study of LigaSure Small Jaw® Versus Conventional Neck Dissection in Head and Neck Cancer Patients

The aim of this prospective randomized study was to investigate if the LigaSure vessel sealing system can reduce the operation duration and the postoperative drainage amount in patients undergoing neck dissection.

Read the detailed description

We compared the differences in perioperative and postoperative variables between LigaSure Small Jaw®-assisted and conventional neck dissection in head and neck cancer patients.

Patients who were scheduled to undergo neck dissection due to head and neck cancer were eligible for this study. After receiving a detailed explanation, all patients signed an informed consent form before randomization. The study group were treated using the LigaSure vessel sealing system (Small Jaw®; Covidien, Colorado, USA) for dissection and hemostasis throughout the whole procedures during neck dissection. Relevant data included tumor-related variables, perioperative parameters, postoperative drainage status, postoperative subjective pain, and analgesic consumption amount were recorded and analyzed.

Being tested
Neck dissection
Keywords
LigaSure, Neck dissection, Operative duration, Postoperative drainage, Postoperative pain
Medical subject headings
Head and Neck Neoplasms, Pain, Postoperative

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Neck dissectionProcedure or surgery

    Also called Ligasure vessel sealing system

    The Small Jaw® handpiece (Small Jaw® with ForceTriad®; Covidien, Colorado, USA) was not only used as a dissection forceps but also served as a ligation device.

Study groups in NCT02597582
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ligusure assisted neck dissectionActive comparatorThe study group patients were treated using the LigaSure vessel sealing system (Small Jaw® with ForceTriad®; Covidien, Colorado, USA) for dissection and hemostasis throughout the whole procedures during neck dissection. Participants were asked to take a Voren enteric-microencapsulated (Diclofenac 50 mg/capsule) capsule 3 times a day for pain relief postoperatively. An additional capsule before sleep was allowed if persistent pain was told by the patient. When intolerable pain was complained in spite of oral analgesic, pethidine (meperidine 50 mg/ampule) injection was prescribed every 6 hours.
Receives: Procedure: Neck dissection
Conventional neck dissectionOtherThe control group patients were treated using conventional cold instrument dissection, monopolar electrocautery hemostasis, and suture ligation during neck dissection. Participants were asked to take a Voren enteric-microencapsulated (Diclofenac 50 mg/capsule) capsule 3 times a day for pain relief postoperatively. An additional capsule before sleep was allowed if persistent pain was told by the patient. When intolerable pain was complained in spite of oral analgesic, pethidine (meperidine 50 mg/ampule) injection was prescribed every 6 hours.
Receives: Procedure: Neck dissection

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Opreation Duration

    The duration from incision of cervial skin till the completion of lymph node dissection

    Measured: 1 day

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Intraoperative Blood Loss

    Intraoperative blood loss was estimated by the sum of the volume in the suction bottle and the increased weight of wet gauzes containing blood after neck dissection.

    Measured: 1 day

  2. Postoperative Drainage Amount

    The amount of drainage from closed system drainage tube

    Measured: 2 weeks

  3. Postoperative Subjective Pain Status

    Visual analogue scale of subjective pain status after operation

    Measured: 2 weeks

  4. Postoperative Oral Analgesic Consumption

    The amount of analgesic consumption via oral ingestion after operation

    Measured: 2 weeks

  5. Postoperative Injected Analgesic Amount

    The amount of injected form analgesic used (Meperidine 50 mg/ampule)

    Measured: 2 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Nov 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2014
  3. Primary completionSep 2015
  4. Study completionOct 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
41 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02597582
Sponsor's protocol ID
TCVGH-1037004C
Status last verified
Aug 2016
First submitted
3 Nov 2015
Last updated
18 Oct 2016
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Lin WJ, Wang CC, Jiang RS, Huang YC, Ho HC, Liu SA. A prospective randomised trial of LigaSure Small Jaw(R) versus conventional neck dissection in head and neck cancer patients. Clin Otolaryngol. 2017 Apr;42(2):245-251. doi: 10.1111/coa.12702. Epub 2016 Jul 26.

    PubMed 27390305

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Neck dissection in people with Head and Neck Neoplasms, run by Taichung Veterans General Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Oct 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Oct 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Opreation Duration (time frame: 1 day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02597582, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Oct 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in