GastritisNCT02597517
New Technology to Differentiate Normal Gastric Mucosa From Helicobacter Pylori Associated Gastritis and Gastric Atrophy
An observational study of Gastritis and Helicobacter Pylori Associated Gastritis, run by Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas at 1 site in Ecuador.
Trial summary
Endoscopy is a tool that has greatly influenced gastroenterological diagnosis. However, conventional endoscopy is limited to detecting lesions on the basis of gross morphological changes and therefore a certainly diagnosis depends on biopsy sampling of macroscopically obvious endoscopic features, or blind biopsy… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Gastritis, Helicobacter Pylori Associated Gastritis, Atrophic Gastritis
- What is being tested?
- Digital chromoendoscopy and magnification
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 72 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEcuador
- Study dates
- Nov 2015to May 2016
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Two groups of functional dyspeptic patients will be selected randomly. Functional dyspepsia will be considered according to the Rome III. Criteria. It will include Epigastric pain Syndrome defined as located pain or burning in the upper abdomen, at least once a week, intermittent, not generalized, not relieved by defecation and without criteria of gall bladder or sphincter of Oddi pathology; and Postprandial distress Syndrome defined as the presence of one or both conditions including nagging feeling of postprandial fullness after normal volume meals, several times a week and early satiety that prevents the completion of a regular meal, several times a week. The criteria must be present in the last three months and have started at least 6 months before diagnosis.
Who may be able to join
- Above 18 years old patients
- Who agree to participate in the study
- Patients with functional dyspeptic symptoms
Who cannot join
- Patients, who were receiving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, pump inhibitors (PPI) or antibiotics in the last 3 weeks.
- Severe uncontrolled coagulopathy
- Prior history of gastric surgery.
- Pregnancy and lactation
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Ecuador1 site
Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas, Omnihospital
Guayaquil, Guayas, 090505
About this study
Official title: Optical Enhancement System ™ Plus Optical Magnification Utility in the Identification of Normal Gastric Mucosa, Helicobacter Pylori Associated Gastritis, and Gastric Atrophy
Endoscopy is a tool that has greatly influenced gastroenterological diagnosis. However, conventional endoscopy is limited to detecting lesions on the basis of gross morphological changes and therefore a certainly diagnosis depends on biopsy sampling of macroscopically obvious endoscopic features, or blind biopsy sampling of normal appearing mucosa with the risk of missed pathology and sampling errors.
Gastric cancer is the second most common cause of cancer related death. One of the main roles of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is to identify gastric cancer at an early stage. The importance of identifying H. pylori infection is because it plays a very important role in gastric carcinogenesis, progressing from chronic gastritis through atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia and finally cancer. The importance of recognition a precancerous gastric lesion is because we can detect most tumors at an early stage and improve the survival.
Most studies conclude that it is difficult to diagnose H. pylori related gastritis and gastric atrophy on the basis of endoscopic findings. Histology is therefore currently considered to be the gold standard for detecting H. pylori infection. The reliability of detecting H. pylori infection histologically depends on the site, number, and size of gastric biopsy specimens, as well as on expertise in staining and visualizing the bacteria. Considerable error also occurs in identifying gastric atrophy using blind biopsy sampling, and neither the original nor the revised version of the Sydney system reliably identifies more than half the cases in patients with confirmed gastric atrophy.
Read the detailed description
Recently an image-enhanced endoscopic technology using a pre-processor band-limited light called Optical Enhancement system (OE system™), was developed by HOYA Co. (Tokyo, Japan) and is now equipped with the latest endoscopy system (Pentax Video Processor EPK-i7010; HOYA Co.). This new technology combines digital signal processing in a similar way to I-scan and optical filters that limit the spectral characteristics of the illumination light. Previous I-scan technology uses white light alone as an illumination light and digital post-processing of the reflection afterwards creates images yielding the virtual chromoendoscopic image. Emission of white light alone causes a potential limitation for the current I-scan technology to obtain higher contrast images of microvascular pattern on the mucosal surface in combination with high magnification as shown by NBI with optical magnification. The basic concept of OE is to overcome the darkness of NBI witch results in less usefulness for detectability in wide-range observation in the gastrointestinal lumen. The new innovated optical filters achieve higher overall transmittance by connecting the peaks of the hemoglobin absorption spectrum (415 nm, 540 nm and 570 nm) creating a continuous wavelength spectrum. There are two modes with different OE filters (Mode 1 and Mode 2). Mode 1 is designed mainly to improve visualization of microvessels with a sufficient amount of light, and Mode 2 is designed to improve contrast of white-light observation by bringing the color tone of the overall image closer to that of natural color (white color tone) with much more light than that of the Mode 1 filter.
In addition to this, new scopes have been developed which combines high definition images with optical magnification called Magniview™. These scopes increase the image up to 136 times with a better quality of image than standard scopes without optical zoom. This allows an optimal and much clear evaluation of the mucosa and superficial vascular aspects, possibly identifying early suggestive signs of inflammation or lesions not seen before using conventional videoendoscopy, high definition scopes with white light or digital post-processor filters systems as I-Scan™.
Estimated enrollment: A total of 100 patients with functional dyspepsia will be include (intervention group: 50 patients and control group: 50 patients)
Study design: This is an observational and analytical cross-section, population - based survey study, with a prospective case collection, non randomized and double blind, performed in a Tertiary Academic Center.
- Allocation: Non randomized, double blind
- Endpoint Classification: Efficacy
- Intervention Model: Non interventional
- Primary Purpose: Diagnosis
Setting: Ecuadorian Institute of Digestive Diseases (IECED), OmniHospital Academic Tertiary Center. We will include patients from October 2015 to December 2015. Patients will be recruited from the gastroenterology unit (IECED). The study protocol and consent form has been approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and will be conducted according to the declaration of Helsinki. Patients will sign an informed consent.
Population selection, inclusion and exclusion criteria: All of the participants with functional dyspepsia will be tested for Helicobacter Pylori (HP) using the stool antigen test. After this phase we will have to groups of patients, dyspeptic HP (+) and dyspeptic HP (-). The first group will be the intervention group and the dyspeptic HP (-) patients will serve as control group. None the patients or the endoscopist will know which group each patient belongs.
Functional dyspepsia will be considered according to the Rome III. Criteria. It will include Epigastric pain Syndrome defined as located pain or burning in the upper abdomen, at least once a week, intermittent, not generalized, not relieved by defecation and without criteria of gall bladder or sphincter of Oddi pathology; and Postprandial distress Syndrome defined as the presence of one or both conditions including nagging feeling of postprandial fullness after normal volume meals, several times a week and early satiety that prevents the completion of a regular meal, several times a week. The criteria must be present in the last three months and have started at least 6 months before diagnosis.
Endoscopic technique: All the patients included in the protocol (intervention group and control group) will be studied by upper endoscopy with Magniview™ scopes and EPK-i7010 processor (OE system™). The endoscopy images will be seen on a 27inch, flat panel, high definition LCD monitor (Radiance™ ultra SC-WU27-G1520 model). The endoscopies will be performed by three endoscopist trained on this new technology (all of them with more than 10 procedures).
Initially a complete (esophagus, stomach, duodenum) conventional white light upper endoscopy will be performed with detailed observation of the whole stomach. After this the gastric body will be evaluated with the OE System and Magniview.
The technique involves the use of a distal black rubber hood (OE-A58) at the tip of the scope (EG-2990Zi) to fix the distance between the tip of the endoscope and the gastric mucosa at 2mm. First the OE system™ will be used (mode 1 and 2), then the optical magnification will be implemented through the actions of a button on the Magniview scope. After reaching the maximum magnification level, the cup will contact to the gastric mucosa and water will be instilled.
Any residue in the stomach will be removed using a water ejection pump. The evaluation of the gastric mucosa will be performed in the gastric body instead of the antrum because in the antrum the collecting venules lie in deeper layers and cannot be seen.
The endoscopic findings in the gastric body will be classified as the Anagnostopoulos GK et al. classification into four types: type 1, honeycomb-type subepithelial capillary network (SECN) with regular arrangement of collecting venules and regular, round pits; type 2, honeycomb-type SECN with regular, round pits, but loss of collecting venules; type 3, loss of normal SECN and collecting venules, with enlarged white pits surrounded by erythema; and type 4, loss of normal SECN and round pits, with irregular arrangement of collecting venules. Type 1 pattern for predicting normal gastric, types 2 and 3 patterns for predicting a Helicobacter pylori infection and type 4 patterns for predicting gastric atrophy.
The gastric body will be photographically recorded, including images of normal mucosa or gastric mucosal changes. Finally biopsies will be taken in both groups, using a regular biopsy forceps; randomly biopsies following the Sydney protocol (two from the gastric body, two from the antrum and one from the incisura angularis) and targeted biopsies from areas with a type 2,3 or 4 pattern, to correlate them with the histological changes in H. pylori gastritis and gastric atrophy. The diagnosis of positive H. pylori infection will be done to all participants by direct visualization at histological examination and using a stool antigen test for H pylori.
Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement: A data set containing photographs of the gastric lesions will be presented to three blinded endoscopists who will confirm or not the findings. Inter and intra-observer reproducibility will be measured based on comparison of still images between the three investigators. To evaluate the intra-observer agreement each investigator will assess the images two times and the answers will be compared. To evaluate the inter-observer agreement all answers between the three investigators will be compared.
Statistical analysis: Base line characteristics will be compared between case and control group using Chi-square o Fisher Test for categorical variable, and for continuing variables, the Mann-Whitney Test will be used. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of the endoscopic findings for normal gastric mucosa, H. pylori infection, and gastric atrophy will be calculated. To examine inter and intra observer agreement, kappa values will be calculated. A P value of less than 0.05 is considered to be statistically significant. All the statistical analysis will be performed using SPSS software suite v.22.
Limitations: The protocol will be performed in only one center and the group selection is not random
- Being tested
- Digital chromoendoscopy and magnification
- Keywords
- gastritis, chromoendoscopy, magnification, Helicobacter pylori, Atrophic gastritis
- Medical subject headings
- Gastritis, Gastritis, Atrophic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Digital chromoendoscopy and magnificationDevice
Also called OE System (EPK-i7010) and Magniview (EG-2990Zi)
After the gastric body mucosal evaluation with white light endoscopy, the Optical Enhancement chromoendoscopy and magnification will be used for a more detailed evaluation of the subepithelial capillary network, the collecting venules and mucosal pits
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | (Digital chromoendoscopy and magnification) Patients with functional dyspepsia and positive stool antigen test for H pylori in whom gastric body mucosal will be evaluated with digital chromoendoscopy (OE system) and magnification technology in addition to white light Receives: Device: Digital chromoendoscopy and magnification | |
| Control group | (Digital chromoendoscopy and magnification) Patients with functional dyspepsia and negative stool antigen test for H pylori in whom gastric mucosal body will be evaluated with digital chromoendoscopy (OE system) and magnification technology in addition to white light Receives: Device: Digital chromoendoscopy and magnification |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Utility OE System™ + Magniview™ in the diagnosis of normal gastric mucosa. Number of patients with type 1 in the Anagnostopoulos GK et al. classification.
Anagnostopoulos GK et al. classified the gastric body mucosal in four types: type 1, honeycomb-type subepithelial capillary network (SECN) with regular arrangement of collecting venules and regular, round pits. Type 1 pattern for predicting normal gastric mucosa.
Measured: two months
Utility OE System™ + Magniview™ in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori associated gastritis. Number of patients with type 2,3 in the Anagnostopoulos GK et al. classification.
Anagnostopoulos GK et al. classified the gastric body mucosal in four types: type 2, honeycomb-type SECN with regular, round pits, but loss of collecting venules; type 3, loss of normal SECN and collecting venules, with enlarged white pits surrounded by erythema. Types 2 and 3 patterns for predicting a Helicobacter pylori infection.
Measured: two months
Utility OE System™ + Magniview™ in the diagnosis of gastric atrophy. Number of patients with type 4 in the Anagnostopoulos GK et al. classification.
Anagnostopoulos GK et al. classified the gastric body mucosal in four types: type 4, loss of normal SECN and round pits, with irregular arrangement of collecting venules. Type 4 patterns for predicting gastric atrophy.
Measured: two months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Measures inter and intra-observer reproducibility in the assessment of the endoscopic patterns detected.
A data set containing photographs of the gastric lesions will be presented to three blinded endoscopists who will confirm or not the findings. Inter and intra-observer reproducibility will be measured based on comparison of still images between the three investigators. To evaluate the intra-observer agreement each investigator will assess the images three times and the answers will be compared. To evaluate the inter-observer agreement all answers between the three investigators will be compared. To examine inter and intra observer agreement, kappa values will be calculated.
Measured: two months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Nov 2015 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2015
- Primary completionApr 2016
- Study completionMay 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for GastritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 72 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Carlos A Robles-Medranda, MD, Principal investigator, Ecuadorian Institute of Digestive Diseases
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02597517
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Sept-1-2015
- Status last verified
- May 2016
- First submitted
- 19 Oct 2015
- Last updated
- 3 May 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Anagnostopoulos GK, Yao K, Kaye P, Fogden E, Fortun P, Shonde A, Foley S, Sunil S, Atherton JJ, Hawkey C, Ragunath K. High-resolution magnification endoscopy can reliably identify normal gastric mucosa, Helicobacter pylori-associated gastritis, and gastric atrophy. Endoscopy. 2007 Mar;39(3):202-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-945056. Epub 2007 Feb 1.
PubMed 17273960Correa P. Human gastric carcinogenesis: a multistep and multifactorial process--First American Cancer Society Award Lecture on Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. Cancer Res. 1992 Dec 15;52(24):6735-40.
PubMed 1458460Whiting JL, Sigurdsson A, Rowlands DC, Hallissey MT, Fielding JW. The long term results of endoscopic surveillance of premalignant gastric lesions. Gut. 2002 Mar;50(3):378-81. doi: 10.1136/gut.50.3.378.
PubMed 11839718Bah A, Saraga E, Armstrong D, Vouillamoz D, Dorta G, Duroux P, Weber B, Froehlich F, Blum AL, Schnegg JF. Endoscopic features of Helicobacter pylori-related gastritis. Endoscopy. 1995 Oct;27(8):593-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1005764.
PubMed 8608753Calabrese C, Di Febo G, Brandi G, Morselli-Labate AM, Areni A, Scialpi C, Biasco G, Miglioli M. Correlation between endoscopic features of gastric antrum, histology and Helicobacter pylori infection in adults. Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999 Jun-Jul;31(5):359-65.
PubMed 10470592Dixon MF, Genta RM, Yardley JH, Correa P. Classification and grading of gastritis. The updated Sydney System. International Workshop on the Histopathology of Gastritis, Houston 1994. Am J Surg Pathol. 1996 Oct;20(10):1161-81. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199610000-00001.
PubMed 8827022Neumann H, Fujishiro M, Wilcox CM, Monkemuller K. Present and future perspectives of virtual chromoendoscopy with i-scan and optical enhancement technology. Dig Endosc. 2014 Jan;26 Suppl 1:43-51. doi: 10.1111/den.12190. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
PubMed 24373000Drossman DA. The functional gastrointestinal disorders and the Rome III process. Gastroenterology. 2006 Apr;130(5):1377-90. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.03.008. No abstract available.
PubMed 16678553
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 May 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Optical Enhancement System ™ Plus Optical Magnification Utility in the Identification of Normal Gastric Mucosa, Helicobacter Pylori Associated Gastritis, and Gastric Atrophy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02597517
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Sept-1-2015
- Keywords
- gastritis, chromoendoscopy, magnification, Helicobacter pylori, Atrophic gastritis
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 72 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades DigestivasUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2015
- Primary completion
- Apr 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Nov 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Endoscopy is a tool that has greatly influenced gastroenterological diagnosis. However, conventional endoscopy is limited to detecting lesions on the basis of gross morphological changes and therefore a certainly diagnosis depends on biopsy sampling of macroscopically obvious endoscopic features, or blind biopsy sampling of normal appearing mucosa with the risk of missed pathology and sampling errors.
Gastric cancer is the second most common cause of cancer related death. One of the main roles of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is to identify gastric cancer at an early stage. The importance of identifying H. pylori infection is because it plays a very important role in gastric carcinogenesis, progressing from chronic gastritis through atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia and finally cancer. The importance of recognition a precancerous gastric lesion is because we can detect most tumors at an early stage and improve the survival.
Most studies conclude that it is difficult to diagnose H. pylori related gastritis and gastric atrophy on the basis of endoscopic findings. Histology is therefore currently considered to be the gold standard for detecting H. pylori infection. The reliability of detecting H. pylori infection histologically depends on the site, number, and size of gastric biopsy specimens, as well as on expertise in staining and visualizing the bacteria. Considerable error also occurs in identifying gastric atrophy using blind biopsy sampling, and neither the original nor the revised version of the Sydney system reliably identifies more than half the cases in patients with confirmed gastric atrophy.
Detailed description
Recently an image-enhanced endoscopic technology using a pre-processor band-limited light called Optical Enhancement system (OE system™), was developed by HOYA Co. (Tokyo, Japan) and is now equipped with the latest endoscopy system (Pentax Video Processor EPK-i7010; HOYA Co.). This new technology combines digital signal processing in a similar way to I-scan and optical filters that limit the spectral characteristics of the illumination light. Previous I-scan technology uses white light alone as an illumination light and digital post-processing of the reflection afterwards creates images yielding the virtual chromoendoscopic image. Emission of white light alone causes a potential limitation for the current I-scan technology to obtain higher contrast images of microvascular pattern on the mucosal surface in combination with high magnification as shown by NBI with optical magnification. The basic concept of OE is to overcome the darkness of NBI witch results in less usefulness for detectability in wide-range observation in the gastrointestinal lumen. The new innovated optical filters achieve higher overall transmittance by connecting the peaks of the hemoglobin absorption spectrum (415 nm, 540 nm and 570 nm) creating a continuous wavelength spectrum. There are two modes with different OE filters (Mode 1 and Mode 2). Mode 1 is designed mainly to improve visualization of microvessels with a sufficient amount of light, and Mode 2 is designed to improve contrast of white-light observation by bringing the color tone of the overall image closer to that of natural color (white color tone) with much more light than that of the Mode 1 filter.
In addition to this, new scopes have been developed which combines high definition images with optical magnification called Magniview™. These scopes increase the image up to 136 times with a better quality of image than standard scopes without optical zoom. This allows an optimal and much clear evaluation of the mucosa and superficial vascular aspects, possibly identifying early suggestive signs of inflammation or lesions not seen before using conventional videoendoscopy, high definition scopes with white light or digital post-processor filters systems as I-Scan™.
Estimated enrollment: A total of 100 patients with functional dyspepsia will be include (intervention group: 50 patients and control group: 50 patients)
Study design: This is an observational and analytical cross-section, population - based survey study, with a prospective case collection, non randomized and double blind, performed in a Tertiary Academic Center.
- Allocation: Non randomized, double blind
- Endpoint Classification: Efficacy
- Intervention Model: Non interventional
- Primary Purpose: Diagnosis
Setting: Ecuadorian Institute of Digestive Diseases (IECED), OmniHospital Academic Tertiary Center. We will include patients from October 2015 to December 2015. Patients will be recruited from the gastroenterology unit (IECED). The study protocol and consent form has been approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and will be conducted according to the declaration of Helsinki. Patients will sign an informed consent.
Population selection, inclusion and exclusion criteria: All of the participants with functional dyspepsia will be tested for Helicobacter Pylori (HP) using the stool antigen test. After this phase we will have to groups of patients, dyspeptic HP (+) and dyspeptic HP (-). The first group will be the intervention group and the dyspeptic HP (-) patients will serve as control group. None the patients or the endoscopist will know which group each patient belongs.
Functional dyspepsia will be considered according to the Rome III. Criteria. It will include Epigastric pain Syndrome defined as located pain or burning in the upper abdomen, at least once a week, intermittent, not generalized, not relieved by defecation and without criteria of gall bladder or sphincter of Oddi pathology; and Postprandial distress Syndrome defined as the presence of one or both conditions including nagging feeling of postprandial fullness after normal volume meals, several times a week and early satiety that prevents the completion of a regular meal, several times a week. The criteria must be present in the last three months and have started at least 6 months before diagnosis.
Endoscopic technique: All the patients included in the protocol (intervention group and control group) will be studied by upper endoscopy with Magniview™ scopes and EPK-i7010 processor (OE system™). The endoscopy images will be seen on a 27inch, flat panel, high definition LCD monitor (Radiance™ ultra SC-WU27-G1520 model). The endoscopies will be performed by three endoscopist trained on this new technology (all of them with more than 10 procedures).
Initially a complete (esophagus, stomach, duodenum) conventional white light upper endoscopy will be performed with detailed observation of the whole stomach. After this the gastric body will be evaluated with the OE System and Magniview.
The technique involves the use of a distal black rubber hood (OE-A58) at the tip of the scope (EG-2990Zi) to fix the distance between the tip of the endoscope and the gastric mucosa at 2mm. First the OE system™ will be used (mode 1 and 2), then the optical magnification will be implemented through the actions of a button on the Magniview scope. After reaching the maximum magnification level, the cup will contact to the gastric mucosa and water will be instilled.
Any residue in the stomach will be removed using a water ejection pump. The evaluation of the gastric mucosa will be performed in the gastric body instead of the antrum because in the antrum the collecting venules lie in deeper layers and cannot be seen.
The endoscopic findings in the gastric body will be classified as the Anagnostopoulos GK et al. classification into four types: type 1, honeycomb-type subepithelial capillary network (SECN) with regular arrangement of collecting venules and regular, round pits; type 2, honeycomb-type SECN with regular, round pits, but loss of collecting venules; type 3, loss of normal SECN and collecting venules, with enlarged white pits surrounded by erythema; and type 4, loss of normal SECN and round pits, with irregular arrangement of collecting venules. Type 1 pattern for predicting normal gastric, types 2 and 3 patterns for predicting a Helicobacter pylori infection and type 4 patterns for predicting gastric atrophy.
The gastric body will be photographically recorded, including images of normal mucosa or gastric mucosal changes. Finally biopsies will be taken in both groups, using a regular biopsy forceps; randomly biopsies following the Sydney protocol (two from the gastric body, two from the antrum and one from the incisura angularis) and targeted biopsies from areas with a type 2,3 or 4 pattern, to correlate them with the histological changes in H. pylori gastritis and gastric atrophy. The diagnosis of positive H. pylori infection will be done to all participants by direct visualization at histological examination and using a stool antigen test for H pylori.
Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement: A data set containing photographs of the gastric lesions will be presented to three blinded endoscopists who will confirm or not the findings. Inter and intra-observer reproducibility will be measured based on comparison of still images between the three investigators. To evaluate the intra-observer agreement each investigator will assess the images two times and the answers will be compared. To evaluate the inter-observer agreement all answers between the three investigators will be compared.
Statistical analysis: Base line characteristics will be compared between case and control group using Chi-square o Fisher Test for categorical variable, and for continuing variables, the Mann-Whitney Test will be used. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of the endoscopic findings for normal gastric mucosa, H. pylori infection, and gastric atrophy will be calculated. To examine inter and intra observer agreement, kappa values will be calculated. A P value of less than 0.05 is considered to be statistically significant. All the statistical analysis will be performed using SPSS software suite v.22.
Limitations: The protocol will be performed in only one center and the group selection is not random
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | – | Device: Digital chromoendoscopy and magnification(Digital chromoendoscopy and magnification) Patients with functional dyspepsia and positive stool antigen test for H pylori in whom gastric body mucosal will be evaluated with digital chromoendoscopy (OE system) and magnification technology in addition to white light |
| Control group | – | Device: Digital chromoendoscopy and magnification(Digital chromoendoscopy and magnification) Patients with functional dyspepsia and negative stool antigen test for H pylori in whom gastric mucosal body will be evaluated with digital chromoendoscopy (OE system) and magnification technology in addition to white light |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Two groups of functional dyspeptic patients will be selected randomly. Functional dyspepsia will be considered according to the Rome III. Criteria. It will include Epigastric pain Syndrome defined as located pain or burning in the upper abdomen, at least once a week, intermittent, not generalized, not relieved by defecation and without criteria of gall bladder or sphincter of Oddi pathology; and Postprandial distress Syndrome defined as the presence of one or both conditions including nagging feeling of postprandial fullness after normal volume meals, several times a week and early satiety that prevents the completion of a regular meal, several times a week. The criteria must be present in the last three months and have started at least 6 months before diagnosis.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Above 18 years old patients
- Who agree to participate in the study
- Patients with functional dyspeptic symptoms
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients, who were receiving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, pump inhibitors (PPI) or antibiotics in the last 3 weeks.
- Severe uncontrolled coagulopathy
- Prior history of gastric surgery.
- Pregnancy and lactation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Digital chromoendoscopy and magnificationAlso: OE System (EPK-i7010) and Magniview (EG-2990Zi)After the gastric body mucosal evaluation with white light endoscopy, the Optical Enhancement chromoendoscopy and magnification will be used for a more detailed evaluation of the subepithelial capillary network, the collecting venules and mucosal pits | Device | Control group, Intervention group |
Primary outcome
Utility OE System™ + Magniview™ in the diagnosis of normal gastric mucosa. Number of patients with type 1 in the Anagnostopoulos GK et al. classification.
Time frame: two months
Anagnostopoulos GK et al. classified the gastric body mucosal in four types: type 1, honeycomb-type subepithelial capillary network (SECN) with regular arrangement of collecting venules and regular, round pits. Type 1 pattern for predicting normal gastric mucosa.
Utility OE System™ + Magniview™ in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori associated gastritis. Number of patients with type 2,3 in the Anagnostopoulos GK et al. classification.
Time frame: two months
Anagnostopoulos GK et al. classified the gastric body mucosal in four types: type 2, honeycomb-type SECN with regular, round pits, but loss of collecting venules; type 3, loss of normal SECN and collecting venules, with enlarged white pits surrounded by erythema. Types 2 and 3 patterns for predicting a Helicobacter pylori infection.
Utility OE System™ + Magniview™ in the diagnosis of gastric atrophy. Number of patients with type 4 in the Anagnostopoulos GK et al. classification.
Time frame: two months
Anagnostopoulos GK et al. classified the gastric body mucosal in four types: type 4, loss of normal SECN and round pits, with irregular arrangement of collecting venules. Type 4 patterns for predicting gastric atrophy.
1 secondary outcome
Measures inter and intra-observer reproducibility in the assessment of the endoscopic patterns detected.
Time frame: two months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 May 2016.
- Results publication: PubMed 17273960Anagnostopoulos GK, Yao K, Kaye P, Fogden E, Fortun P, Shonde A, Foley S, Sunil S, Atherton JJ, Hawkey C, Ragunath K. High-resolution magnification endoscopy can reliably identify normal gastric mucosa, Helicobacter pylori-associated gastritis, and gastric atrophy. Endoscopy. 2007 Mar;39(3):202-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-945056. Epub 2007 Feb 1.
- Results publication: PubMed 1458460Correa P. Human gastric carcinogenesis: a multistep and multifactorial process--First American Cancer Society Award Lecture on Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. Cancer Res. 1992 Dec 15;52(24):6735-40.
- Results publication: PubMed 11839718Whiting JL, Sigurdsson A, Rowlands DC, Hallissey MT, Fielding JW. The long term results of endoscopic surveillance of premalignant gastric lesions. Gut. 2002 Mar;50(3):378-81. doi: 10.1136/gut.50.3.378.
- Results publication: PubMed 8608753Bah A, Saraga E, Armstrong D, Vouillamoz D, Dorta G, Duroux P, Weber B, Froehlich F, Blum AL, Schnegg JF. Endoscopic features of Helicobacter pylori-related gastritis. Endoscopy. 1995 Oct;27(8):593-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1005764.
- Results publication: PubMed 10470592Calabrese C, Di Febo G, Brandi G, Morselli-Labate AM, Areni A, Scialpi C, Biasco G, Miglioli M. Correlation between endoscopic features of gastric antrum, histology and Helicobacter pylori infection in adults. Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999 Jun-Jul;31(5):359-65.
- Results publication: PubMed 8827022Dixon MF, Genta RM, Yardley JH, Correa P. Classification and grading of gastritis. The updated Sydney System. International Workshop on the Histopathology of Gastritis, Houston 1994. Am J Surg Pathol. 1996 Oct;20(10):1161-81. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199610000-00001.
- Results publication: PubMed 24373000Neumann H, Fujishiro M, Wilcox CM, Monkemuller K. Present and future perspectives of virtual chromoendoscopy with i-scan and optical enhancement technology. Dig Endosc. 2014 Jan;26 Suppl 1:43-51. doi: 10.1111/den.12190. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
- Results publication: PubMed 16678553Drossman DA. The functional gastrointestinal disorders and the Rome III process. Gastroenterology. 2006 Apr;130(5):1377-90. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.03.008. No abstract available.
Related trials for Gastritis
Active, not recruiting
To Develop Methods for the Rehabilitation of Chronic Gastroduodenal Pathology in Children.
Gastritis Chronic, Gastroduodenitis
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Vedolizumab for the Treatment of Collagenous Gastritis
Collagenous Gastritis
RecruitingObservational study
Family Members at INcreased-risk for Developing Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), Ulcerative Colitis (UC)
RecruitingObservational study
Helicobacter Pylori, Atrophic Gastritis and Intestinal Metaplasia Registry and Prospective Study
Helicobacter Pylori, Atrophic Gastritis
RecruitingObservational study
Prediction of Gastric Cancer in Intestinal Metaplasia and Atrophic Gastritis
Gastric Cancer, Intestinal Metaplasia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Carlos A Robles-Medranda, MD principal investigator
Ecuadorian Institute of Digestive Diseases
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Gastritis and Helicobacter Pylori Associated Gastritis, run by Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas at 1 site in Ecuador.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 May 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Ecuador. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Utility OE System™ + Magniview™ in the diagnosis of normal gastric mucosa. Number of patients with type 1 in the Anagnostopoulos GK et al. classification. (time frame: two months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02597517, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 May 2016.