Dry Macular DegenerationPhase 1/2NCT02590692
Study of Subretinal Implantation of Human Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived RPE Cells in Advanced Dry AMD
A Phase 1/2 study testing CPCB-RPE1 in people with Dry Macular Degeneration and Geographic Atrophy, run by Regenerative Patch Technologies, LLC at 6 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The Phase I/IIa clinical trial is designed to assess the feasibility of delivery and safety of Human Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived RPE Cells on a parylene membrane (CPCB-RPE1) in patients with advanced, dry age-related macular degeneration. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 55 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Dry Macular Degeneration, Geographic Atrophy
- What is being tested?
- CPCB-RPE1
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 16 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 16 Feb 2016to Jun 2023
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 55 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients able to understand and willing to sign the informed consent
- Adult male or female patients with the age of 55 to 85 (inclusive) years who are not employees of the trial sites
- In sufficiently good health to reasonably expect survival for at least five years after treatment
- Clinical findings consistent with advanced dry AMD with evidence of one or more areas of ≥1.25 square millimeter of geographic atrophy involving the central fovea
- Geographic atrophy defined as attenuation or loss of RPE as observed by biomicroscopy, OCT, or FAF
- The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of the eye to receive the implant will be equal or worse than 20/200 in the first half of the study patients and between 20/80 and 20/400 (inclusive) in the second half of the patients. The BCVA of the eye that is NOT to receive the implant will be better or equal to the eye that will receive the implant
Show all 12Show fewer
- Medically suitable to undergo pars plana vitrectomy and the surgical implant procedure, including being able to position post-operatively and use post-operative medications as required
- Medically suitable for general anesthesia or monitored intravenous sedation, if needed
- Patients who are pseudophakic or aphakic in the study eye
- If designated as an organ donor, willing to forego live organ donation
- Willing to consent to the post-mortem removal of the implant from the treated eye for the sponsor's analysis. The patient may also elect to donate the implanted and fellow, untreated eye, for histological analysis.
- Able to understand the requirements of the study and willing and able to participate in long term follow up.
Who cannot join
- Presence of active or inactive choroidal neovascularization (CNV)
- Presence or history of retinal dystrophy, retinitis pigmentosa, chorioretinitis, central serous choroidopathy or any other inflammatory ocular disease except dry eye syndrome
- Presence or history of severe, end-stage corneal dystrophy
- History of steroid induced ocular hypertension or glaucoma
- Presence of moderate to severe glaucomatous optic neuropathy in the study eye, uncontrolled IOP, use of two or more topical agents to control intraocular pressure; history of glaucoma-filtering surgery
- Presence of moderate to severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy in the study eye
Show all 27Show fewer
- Presence of any proliferative diabetic retinopathy in the study eye
- Presence of uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (HbA1c > 8) at the time of screening
- History of retinal detachment or retinal detachment repair in the study eye other than peripheral retinal tears or holes treated exclusively with laser or cryotherapy
- Presence of any other sight-threatening ocular disease
- History of cognitive impairments or dementia which may impact the patient's ability to participate in the informed consent process and to appropriately complete evaluations
- History of any immunodeficiency
- Evidence of herpetic or other viral eye disease
- Any current use of immunosuppressive therapy other than intermittent or low dose corticosteroids
- Participation within previous 3 months in any clinical trial of a drug by ocular or systemic administration (within previous 18 months for sustained release products)
- Axial myopia of greater than -8 diopters in the eye that is to be implanted
- Axial length greater than 28 mm in the eye that is to be implanted
- History of malignancy within the past 5 years (with the exception of successfully treated [excised] basal cell carcinoma [skin cancer] or successfully treated squamous cell carcinoma of the skin)
- History of myocardial infarction in previous 12 months
- Alanine transaminase/aspartate aminotransferase (ALT/AST) >3.0 times the upper limit of normal or any known liver disease
- Renal insufficiency, as defined by estimated creatinine clearance of < 45 ml/min
- A positive (or "reactive") test for HIV, or Hepatitis B, or Hepatitis C
- A hemoglobin concentration of less than 10 gm/dl, a platelet count of less than 100K/µL or an absolute neutrophil count of less than 1000/µL at study entry
- Ocular lens removal within the previous 6 weeks in either eye
- Any other ocular surgery in the study eye in the previous 3 months
- If female, pregnancy, the wish to become pregnant, or lactation
- Any other medical condition, which, in the Investigator's judgment, will interfere with the patient's ability to comply with the protocol, compromises patient safety, or interferes with the interpretation of the study results
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 1 country.
6 sites in 1 country
United States6 sites
Retina-Vitreous Associates Medical Group
Beverly Hills, California, 90211
USC Keck School of Medicine / Eye Institute
Los Angeles, California, 90033
Southern California Desert Retina Consultants
Palm Desert, California, 92211
Retinal Consultants of Arizona LTD
Phoenix, Arizona, 85053
Orange County Retina Medical Group
Santa Ana, California, 92705
California Retina Consultants
Santa Barbara, California, 93103
About this study
Official title: A Phase I/IIa Safety Study of Subretinal Implantation of CPCB-RPE1 (Human Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells Seeded on a Polymeric Substrate) in Subjects With Advanced, Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
The Phase I/IIa clinical trial is designed to assess the feasibility of delivery and safety of Human Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived RPE Cells on a parylene membrane (CPCB-RPE1) in patients with advanced, dry age-related macular degeneration.
Primary Objective:
Read more
- To test the safety and tolerability of CPCB-RPE1 during and after subretinal implantation in patients with geographic atrophy with evidence of involvement of the central fovea.
Secondary Objective:
- To assess visual acuity, visual field, and retinal function after CPCB-RPE1 implantation. Implanted and fellow eyes will be compared post-implantation to assess the ability of the implant to prevent disease progression.
Exploratory Objectives:
- To assess the feasibility of measuring the change in area of geographic atrophy over time using spectral domain optical coherence tomography or fundus autofluorescence.
Read the detailed description
The study will include two cohorts, each of 10 patients. For the first cohort, the study population will be patients with advanced, dry AMD with evidence of significant geographic atrophy involving the fovea. These patients will have significant central vision loss with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of the eye to be implanted of BCVA of 20/200 or worse. Each of these patients will have substantial RPE and photoreceptor loss. Patients will be screened for overall health status to minimize risks associated with retinal surgery and any subsequent immunosuppression.
As the safety and tolerability of CPCB-RPE1 is demonstrated in the first cohort, patients with less advanced disease will be recruited into a second cohort in this Phase I/IIa clinical trial. In this second cohort patients will have significant central vision loss with BCVA of the eye to be implanted of 20/80 or worse, but better than or equal to 20/400 with comparably less damage to the RPE/photoreceptor complex than Cohort 1. These patients will be screened in the same manner for overall health status to minimize risks associated with retinal surgery and any subsequent immunosuppression. Assessments of visual function will be the same as in Cohort 1.
- Conditions
- Dry Macular Degeneration, Geographic Atrophy
- Being tested
- CPCB-RPE1
- Medical subject headings
- Geographic Atrophy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CPCB-RPE1Biological
Patients will receive one CPCB-RPE1 implant of approximately 100,000 differentiated RPE cells attached to a small parylene membrane. The density of cells on the membrane represents the approximate density of RPE cells in the human eye. The membrane size was chosen to cover a substantial portion of the macular region of the retina.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CPCB-RPE1 treatment | Experimental | Subretinal implantation of CPCB-RPE1 in dry AMD patients Receives: Biological: CPCB-RPE1 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Frequency and Severity of Treatment-Related Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]
Comparison of product, procedure and immunosuppression related adverse events in the implanted eye to those experienced in the non-treated eye
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (3)
Visual Acuity
Comparison of VA changes in the treated eye versus baseline and versus the non-treated eye
Measured: 1 year
Visual Field
Comparison of visual field changes in the treated eye versus baseline and versus the non-treated eye
Measured: 1 year
Photoreceptor Electrical Responses
Comparison of multifocal electroretinogram changes in the treated eye versus baseline and versus the non-treated eye
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Study start16 Feb 2016
- Primary completionJul 2019
- Study completionJun 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Dry Macular DegenerationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Regenerative Patch Technologies, LLC
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jane Lebkowski, Ph.D., Study director, Regenerative Patch Technologies
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02590692
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RPT-14-01
- Status last verified
- May 2020
- First submitted
- 23 Oct 2015
- Last updated
- 29 May 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 May 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase I/IIa Safety Study of Subretinal Implantation of CPCB-RPE1 (Human Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells Seeded on a Polymeric Substrate) in Subjects With Advanced, Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02590692
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RPT-14-01
- Conditions
- Dry Macular Degeneration, Geographic Atrophy
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Regenerative Patch Technologies, LLCIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 16 Feb 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jul 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The Phase I/IIa clinical trial is designed to assess the feasibility of delivery and safety of Human Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived RPE Cells on a parylene membrane (CPCB-RPE1) in patients with advanced, dry age-related macular degeneration.
Primary Objective:
- To test the safety and tolerability of CPCB-RPE1 during and after subretinal implantation in patients with geographic atrophy with evidence of involvement of the central fovea.
Secondary Objective:
- To assess visual acuity, visual field, and retinal function after CPCB-RPE1 implantation. Implanted and fellow eyes will be compared post-implantation to assess the ability of the implant to prevent disease progression.
Exploratory Objectives:
- To assess the feasibility of measuring the change in area of geographic atrophy over time using spectral domain optical coherence tomography or fundus autofluorescence.
Detailed description
The study will include two cohorts, each of 10 patients. For the first cohort, the study population will be patients with advanced, dry AMD with evidence of significant geographic atrophy involving the fovea. These patients will have significant central vision loss with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of the eye to be implanted of BCVA of 20/200 or worse. Each of these patients will have substantial RPE and photoreceptor loss. Patients will be screened for overall health status to minimize risks associated with retinal surgery and any subsequent immunosuppression.
As the safety and tolerability of CPCB-RPE1 is demonstrated in the first cohort, patients with less advanced disease will be recruited into a second cohort in this Phase I/IIa clinical trial. In this second cohort patients will have significant central vision loss with BCVA of the eye to be implanted of 20/80 or worse, but better than or equal to 20/400 with comparably less damage to the RPE/photoreceptor complex than Cohort 1. These patients will be screened in the same manner for overall health status to minimize risks associated with retinal surgery and any subsequent immunosuppression. Assessments of visual function will be the same as in Cohort 1.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CPCB-RPE1 treatment | Experimental | Biological: CPCB-RPE1Subretinal implantation of CPCB-RPE1 in dry AMD patients |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 55 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Patients able to understand and willing to sign the informed consent
- Adult male or female patients with the age of 55 to 85 (inclusive) years who are not employees of the trial sites
- In sufficiently good health to reasonably expect survival for at least five years after treatment
- Clinical findings consistent with advanced dry AMD with evidence of one or more areas of ≥1.25 square millimeter of geographic atrophy involving the central fovea
- Geographic atrophy defined as attenuation or loss of RPE as observed by biomicroscopy, OCT, or FAF
Key exclusion criteria (27 listed)
- Presence of active or inactive choroidal neovascularization (CNV)
- Presence or history of retinal dystrophy, retinitis pigmentosa, chorioretinitis, central serous choroidopathy or any other inflammatory ocular disease except dry eye syndrome
- Presence or history of severe, end-stage corneal dystrophy
- History of steroid induced ocular hypertension or glaucoma
- Presence of moderate to severe glaucomatous optic neuropathy in the study eye, uncontrolled IOP, use of two or more topical agents to control intraocular pressure; history of glaucoma-filtering surgery
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CPCB-RPE1Patients will receive one CPCB-RPE1 implant of approximately 100,000 differentiated RPE cells attached to a small parylene membrane. The density of cells on the membrane represents the approximate density of RPE cells in the human eye. The membrane size was chosen to cover a substantial portion of the macular region of the retina. | Biological | CPCB-RPE1 treatment |
Primary outcome
Frequency and Severity of Treatment-Related Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]
Time frame: 1 year
Comparison of product, procedure and immunosuppression related adverse events in the implanted eye to those experienced in the non-treated eye
3 secondary outcomes
Visual Acuity
Time frame: 1 year
Visual Field
Time frame: 1 year
Photoreceptor Electrical Responses
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 May 2020.
Related trials for Dry Macular Degeneration
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Phase 1/2 Study of VOY-101 in Patients With Advanced Non-Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Geographic Atrophy
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Autologous Transplantation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Retinal Pigment Epithelium for Geographic Atrophy Associated With Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Geographic Atrophy
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Investigating Subcutaneously Administered Pozelimab in Combination With Cemdisiran or Cemdisiran Alone in Adult Participants With Geographic Atrophy
Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD), Geographic Atrophy (GA)
Not yet recruiting
Safety and Clinical Performance of the LENTIS® MAX LS-313 MF80 Compared With the Monofocal L-313 in Cataract Patients With Late Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Multicenter Comparative Clinical Investigation.
Cataract, AMD - Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Not yet recruiting
MacuMira Microcurrent Stimulation for Dark Adaptation in Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jane Lebkowski, Ph.D. study director
Regenerative Patch Technologies
6 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing CPCB-RPE1 in people with Dry Macular Degeneration and Geographic Atrophy, run by Regenerative Patch Technologies, LLC at 6 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 27 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 May 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Frequency and Severity of Treatment-Related Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability] (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 May 2020.