AzTrials
AzTrials

Circumcision, MaleNCT02587208

Plastibell Versus Conventional Dissection Techniques for Circumcision in Infants and Children

A study testing Plastibell and conventional sleeve in people with Circumcision, Male, run by King Saud University at 1 site in Saudi Arabia.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Outcome of circumcision with Plastibell or conventional dissection techniques in infants and children: A prospective randomized controlled trial Aim: to evaluate and compare postoperative and esthetic outcomes after Plastibell and conventional dissection circumcision Methods: Randomized Controlled Trial Inclusion… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 3 months to 12 years, men only
Conditions the study is for
Circumcision, Male
What is being tested?
Plastibell and conventional sleeve
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteSaudi Arabia
Study dates
Jan 2015to Mar 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 3 months to 12 years
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Patients 3 months - 12 years (inclusive) who required circumcision for various indications.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with bleeding or clotting disorders
  • Those whose parents insisted on a particular type of surgery
  • Children with lateral- lateral diameter of the glans over which a Plastibell device could not be placed

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Abdulrahman Alzahem, MBBS, FRCSC contact

+966114695277

aalzahem@ksu.edu.sa

Saudi Arabia1 site, 1 recruiting
  • King Saud University

    Riyadh, Riyadh Region, 11472

    Abdulrahman M Alzahem, MBBS, FRCSC, aalzahem@ksu.edu.sa

    Recruiting

Other trials in Saudi Arabia

About this study

Official title: Plastibell Versus Conventional Dissection Techniques for Circumcision in Infants

Outcome of circumcision with Plastibell or conventional dissection techniques in infants and children: A prospective randomized controlled trial

Aim: to evaluate and compare postoperative and esthetic outcomes after Plastibell and conventional dissection circumcision

Read more

Methods:

Randomized Controlled Trial Inclusion criteria: patients younger than 13 years including neonates who required circumcision for various indications.

Exclusion criteria: - patients with bleeding or clotting disorders

  • Those whose parents insisted on a particular type of surgery
  • Children with lateral- lateral diameter of the glans over which a Plastibell device could not be placed Primary endpoint: parental concerns and satisfaction (questionnaire) Secondary endpoints: composite morbidity, operative time, postoperative pain (analgesic requirements)
  • Early postoperative problems: infection, bleeding, swelling, dysuria, pain (incidence, mean duration, emergency care if necessary, parental concerns about them (on a Likert-type 5-point scale [ not at all, a little, rather, very, very much])
  • Irregular scar, jumbling of tissues at the site of frenulum (assessed by physician)
  • Postoperative adhesions (assessed by physician)
  • Postoperative pain and analgesic requirements (paracetamol 15 mg/kg PO Q6 hrs for 48 hrs then PRN) number of doses and days required for analgesia as judged by parents, VAS ( >- 6 SCORE ), Kaplan-Meier analysis (time to event)
  • Parental satisfaction ( overall esthetic outcome [ very much satisfied, very satisfied, rather, a little satisfied, not at all satisfied])
  • Parental satisfaction ( skin removal): excess skin removal, insufficient skin removal [ not at all, a little, rather, very, very much]
  • Time for bell separation (mean +-SD), Kaplan-Meier analysis for different age groups
Read the detailed description

Outcome of circumcision with Plastibell or conventional dissection techniques in infants and children: A prospective randomized controlled trial Aim: to evaluate and compare postoperative and esthetic outcomes after Plastibell and conventional dissection circumcision

Methods:

A balanced, parallel group, prospective randomized controlled trial is to be performed over 2 years at our institute. Patients enrollment will commence after approval of our institutional review board as well as obtaining informed consent from the patient's legal guardians.

Participants Inclusion criteria: Patients younger than 13 years including neonates who required circumcision for various indications.

Exclusion criteria: - Patients with bleeding or clotting disorders

  • Patients with hypospadias or other penile anomalies
  • Those whose parents insisted on a particular type of surgery
  • Children with lateral- lateral diameter of the glans over which a Plastibell device could not be placed Interventions The subjects will be randomized and allocated into two groups: the Plastibell and sleeve dissection techniques.

Sample size calculation Power calculation was based on aesthetic outcome which was based on previous studies (Nagdeve et al and Fraser et al) wherein 60-69% of subjects operated by Plastibell technique and 43-45% by conventional dissection technique had good satisfaction. Establishing alpha at 0.2 and a power of 0.80 produced a sample size of 50 patients per arm.

Assignment and randomization A block randomization scheme will be used with equal allocation of subjects to the Plastibell and sleeve dissection groups. There are a total of 10 blocks, each having 10 subjects. One block will be selected by simple random sampling and its subjects will be subjected to the intervention.

Protocol All the parents will be informed regarding details of surgery, complications, postoperative care and follow-up protocol. Both procedures are performed under light general anesthesia and either dorsal penile nerve block or caudal block. The first step in both groups is to separate the foreskin from the glans penis and removal of smegma.

In the Plastibell group, the size of the device is chosen according to the lateral-lateral diameter of the glans. A dorsal slit incision is made and then the foreskin is pulled up and the Plastibell device placed between the prepuce and the glans. A non-absorbable string was tightly tied around the device and the distal prepuce is removed.

In the sleeve dissection group, a double incision technique on both outer and inner layers of the foreskin is employed. Hemostasis is achieved by bipolar diathermy, and cut edges are sutured with 5/0 rapide vicryl.

All patients will be managed on a day-care basis. At discharge, they will be prescribed syrup/tablet paracetamol 15mg/kg/dose every 6 hours whenever needed if pain score >_6 based on a visual analog scale for pain assessment. Parents will be told to write down how many times they give analgesic each day until the first postoperative visit.

Follow-up will be done at 14th (or after separation of Plastibell whichever later) and 90th days after surgery.

Written questionnaires will be given to parents at time of discharge Primary endpoint: Parental concerns and satisfaction (questionnaire) Secondary endpoints: Composite Morbidity, Operative Time, Postoperative Pain (analgesic requirements)

  • Early postoperative problems: infection, bleeding, swelling, dysuria, pain (incidence, mean duration, emergency care if necessary, parental concerns about them (on a Likert-type 5-point scale [not at all, a little, rather, very, very much])
  • Irregular scar, jumbling of tissues at the site of frenulum (assessed by physician)
  • Postoperative adhesions (assessed by physician)
  • Postoperative pain and analgesic requirements (paracetamol 15 mg/kg PO Q6 hrs PRN) number of doses and days required for analgesia as judged by parents, VAS ( >- 6 SCORE ), Kaplan-Meier analysis (time to event)
  • Parental satisfaction ( overall esthetic outcome [ very much satisfied, very satisfied, rather, a little satisfied, not at all satisfied])
  • Parental satisfaction ( skin removal): excess skin removal, insufficient skin removal [ not at all, a little, rather, very, very much]
  • Time for bell separation (mean +-SD), Kaplan-Meier analysis for different age groups
Being tested
Plastibell, conventional sleeve
Keywords
circumcision, plastibell, infants, open sleeve

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PlastibellDevice

    In the Plastibell group, the size of the device is chosen according to the lateral-lateral diameter of the glans. A dorsal slit incision is made and then the foreskin is pulled up and the Plastibell device placed between the prepuce and the glans. A non-absorbable string was tightly tied around the device and the distal prepuce is removed.

  • conventional sleeveProcedure or surgery

    In the sleeve dissection group, a double incision technique on both outer and inner layers of the foreskin is employed. Hemostasis is achieved by bipolar diathermy, and cut edges are sutured with 5/0 rapide vicryl.

Study groups in NCT02587208
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
conventional sleeveActive comparatorIn the sleeve dissection group, a double incision technique on both outer and inner layers of the foreskin is employed. Hemostasis is achieved by bipolar diathermy, and cut edges are sutured with 5/0 rapide vicryl.
Receives: Procedure: conventional sleeve
plastibellActive comparatorIn the Plastibell group, the size of the device is chosen according to the lateral-lateral diameter of the glans. A dorsal slit incision is made and then the foreskin is pulled up and the Plastibell device placed between the prepuce and the glans. A non-absorbable string was tightly tied around the device and the distal prepuce is removed.
Receives: Device: Plastibell

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Questionnaire for Parental satisfaction (overal esthetic outcome)

    • Parental satisfaction ( overall esthetic outcome [ very much satisfied, very satisfied, rather, a little satisfied, not at all satisfied])

    Measured: 3-6 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Postoperative pain measures

    VAS ( >6/10) score would entitle giving paracetamol for patient and the total doses/total days where paracetamol was needed will be calculated

    Measured: 1-2 weeks

  2. Early composite morbidity (incidence % and mean duration)

    Early postoperative problems: infection, bleeding, swelling, dysuria, pain (incidence, mean duration, emergency care if necessary

    Measured: 2-4 weeks

  3. Likert -type 5-point scale for Parental concerns about early composite morbidity

    parental concerns about them (on a Likert-type 5-point scale [not at all, a little, rather, very, very much])

    Measured: 2-4 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Oct 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2015
  3. Primary completionDec 2015 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMar 2016 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02587208
Sponsor's protocol ID
E14-1270
Status last verified
Oct 2015
First submitted
30 Aug 2015
Last updated
27 Oct 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Plastibell and conventional sleeve in people with Circumcision, Male, run by King Saud University at 1 site in Saudi Arabia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Oct 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Saudi Arabia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Abdulrahman Alzahem, MBBS, FRCSC (+966114695277, aalzahem@ksu.edu.sa), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Questionnaire for Parental satisfaction (overal esthetic outcome) (time frame: 3-6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Oct 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in