Circumcision, MaleNCT02587208
Plastibell Versus Conventional Dissection Techniques for Circumcision in Infants and Children
A study testing Plastibell and conventional sleeve in people with Circumcision, Male, run by King Saud University at 1 site in Saudi Arabia.
Trial summary
Outcome of circumcision with Plastibell or conventional dissection techniques in infants and children: A prospective randomized controlled trial Aim: to evaluate and compare postoperative and esthetic outcomes after Plastibell and conventional dissection circumcision Methods: Randomized Controlled Trial Inclusion… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 3 months to 12 years, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Circumcision, Male
- What is being tested?
- Plastibell and conventional sleeve
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSaudi Arabia
- Study dates
- Jan 2015to Mar 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 3 months to 12 years
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Patients 3 months - 12 years (inclusive) who required circumcision for various indications.
Who cannot join
- Patients with bleeding or clotting disorders
- Those whose parents insisted on a particular type of surgery
- Children with lateral- lateral diameter of the glans over which a Plastibell device could not be placed
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Saudi Arabia1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
King Saud University
Riyadh, Riyadh Region, 11472
Abdulrahman M Alzahem, MBBS, FRCSC, aalzahem@ksu.edu.sa
About this study
Official title: Plastibell Versus Conventional Dissection Techniques for Circumcision in Infants
Outcome of circumcision with Plastibell or conventional dissection techniques in infants and children: A prospective randomized controlled trial
Aim: to evaluate and compare postoperative and esthetic outcomes after Plastibell and conventional dissection circumcision
Read more
Methods:
Randomized Controlled Trial Inclusion criteria: patients younger than 13 years including neonates who required circumcision for various indications.
Exclusion criteria: - patients with bleeding or clotting disorders
- Those whose parents insisted on a particular type of surgery
- Children with lateral- lateral diameter of the glans over which a Plastibell device could not be placed Primary endpoint: parental concerns and satisfaction (questionnaire) Secondary endpoints: composite morbidity, operative time, postoperative pain (analgesic requirements)
- Early postoperative problems: infection, bleeding, swelling, dysuria, pain (incidence, mean duration, emergency care if necessary, parental concerns about them (on a Likert-type 5-point scale [ not at all, a little, rather, very, very much])
- Irregular scar, jumbling of tissues at the site of frenulum (assessed by physician)
- Postoperative adhesions (assessed by physician)
- Postoperative pain and analgesic requirements (paracetamol 15 mg/kg PO Q6 hrs for 48 hrs then PRN) number of doses and days required for analgesia as judged by parents, VAS ( >- 6 SCORE ), Kaplan-Meier analysis (time to event)
- Parental satisfaction ( overall esthetic outcome [ very much satisfied, very satisfied, rather, a little satisfied, not at all satisfied])
- Parental satisfaction ( skin removal): excess skin removal, insufficient skin removal [ not at all, a little, rather, very, very much]
- Time for bell separation (mean +-SD), Kaplan-Meier analysis for different age groups
Read the detailed description
Outcome of circumcision with Plastibell or conventional dissection techniques in infants and children: A prospective randomized controlled trial Aim: to evaluate and compare postoperative and esthetic outcomes after Plastibell and conventional dissection circumcision
Methods:
A balanced, parallel group, prospective randomized controlled trial is to be performed over 2 years at our institute. Patients enrollment will commence after approval of our institutional review board as well as obtaining informed consent from the patient's legal guardians.
Participants Inclusion criteria: Patients younger than 13 years including neonates who required circumcision for various indications.
Exclusion criteria: - Patients with bleeding or clotting disorders
- Patients with hypospadias or other penile anomalies
- Those whose parents insisted on a particular type of surgery
- Children with lateral- lateral diameter of the glans over which a Plastibell device could not be placed Interventions The subjects will be randomized and allocated into two groups: the Plastibell and sleeve dissection techniques.
Sample size calculation Power calculation was based on aesthetic outcome which was based on previous studies (Nagdeve et al and Fraser et al) wherein 60-69% of subjects operated by Plastibell technique and 43-45% by conventional dissection technique had good satisfaction. Establishing alpha at 0.2 and a power of 0.80 produced a sample size of 50 patients per arm.
Assignment and randomization A block randomization scheme will be used with equal allocation of subjects to the Plastibell and sleeve dissection groups. There are a total of 10 blocks, each having 10 subjects. One block will be selected by simple random sampling and its subjects will be subjected to the intervention.
Protocol All the parents will be informed regarding details of surgery, complications, postoperative care and follow-up protocol. Both procedures are performed under light general anesthesia and either dorsal penile nerve block or caudal block. The first step in both groups is to separate the foreskin from the glans penis and removal of smegma.
In the Plastibell group, the size of the device is chosen according to the lateral-lateral diameter of the glans. A dorsal slit incision is made and then the foreskin is pulled up and the Plastibell device placed between the prepuce and the glans. A non-absorbable string was tightly tied around the device and the distal prepuce is removed.
In the sleeve dissection group, a double incision technique on both outer and inner layers of the foreskin is employed. Hemostasis is achieved by bipolar diathermy, and cut edges are sutured with 5/0 rapide vicryl.
All patients will be managed on a day-care basis. At discharge, they will be prescribed syrup/tablet paracetamol 15mg/kg/dose every 6 hours whenever needed if pain score >_6 based on a visual analog scale for pain assessment. Parents will be told to write down how many times they give analgesic each day until the first postoperative visit.
Follow-up will be done at 14th (or after separation of Plastibell whichever later) and 90th days after surgery.
Written questionnaires will be given to parents at time of discharge Primary endpoint: Parental concerns and satisfaction (questionnaire) Secondary endpoints: Composite Morbidity, Operative Time, Postoperative Pain (analgesic requirements)
- Early postoperative problems: infection, bleeding, swelling, dysuria, pain (incidence, mean duration, emergency care if necessary, parental concerns about them (on a Likert-type 5-point scale [not at all, a little, rather, very, very much])
- Irregular scar, jumbling of tissues at the site of frenulum (assessed by physician)
- Postoperative adhesions (assessed by physician)
- Postoperative pain and analgesic requirements (paracetamol 15 mg/kg PO Q6 hrs PRN) number of doses and days required for analgesia as judged by parents, VAS ( >- 6 SCORE ), Kaplan-Meier analysis (time to event)
- Parental satisfaction ( overall esthetic outcome [ very much satisfied, very satisfied, rather, a little satisfied, not at all satisfied])
- Parental satisfaction ( skin removal): excess skin removal, insufficient skin removal [ not at all, a little, rather, very, very much]
- Time for bell separation (mean +-SD), Kaplan-Meier analysis for different age groups
- Conditions
- Circumcision, Male
- Being tested
- Plastibell, conventional sleeve
- Keywords
- circumcision, plastibell, infants, open sleeve
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PlastibellDevice
In the Plastibell group, the size of the device is chosen according to the lateral-lateral diameter of the glans. A dorsal slit incision is made and then the foreskin is pulled up and the Plastibell device placed between the prepuce and the glans. A non-absorbable string was tightly tied around the device and the distal prepuce is removed.
conventional sleeveProcedure or surgery
In the sleeve dissection group, a double incision technique on both outer and inner layers of the foreskin is employed. Hemostasis is achieved by bipolar diathermy, and cut edges are sutured with 5/0 rapide vicryl.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| conventional sleeve | Active comparator | In the sleeve dissection group, a double incision technique on both outer and inner layers of the foreskin is employed. Hemostasis is achieved by bipolar diathermy, and cut edges are sutured with 5/0 rapide vicryl. Receives: Procedure: conventional sleeve |
| plastibell | Active comparator | In the Plastibell group, the size of the device is chosen according to the lateral-lateral diameter of the glans. A dorsal slit incision is made and then the foreskin is pulled up and the Plastibell device placed between the prepuce and the glans. A non-absorbable string was tightly tied around the device and the distal prepuce is removed. Receives: Device: Plastibell |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Questionnaire for Parental satisfaction (overal esthetic outcome)
- Parental satisfaction ( overall esthetic outcome [ very much satisfied, very satisfied, rather, a little satisfied, not at all satisfied])
Measured: 3-6 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Postoperative pain measures
VAS ( >6/10) score would entitle giving paracetamol for patient and the total doses/total days where paracetamol was needed will be calculated
Measured: 1-2 weeks
Early composite morbidity (incidence % and mean duration)
Early postoperative problems: infection, bleeding, swelling, dysuria, pain (incidence, mean duration, emergency care if necessary
Measured: 2-4 weeks
Likert -type 5-point scale for Parental concerns about early composite morbidity
parental concerns about them (on a Likert-type 5-point scale [not at all, a little, rather, very, very much])
Measured: 2-4 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2015
- Primary completionDec 2015 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2016 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Circumcision, MaleStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- King Saud University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr Abdulrahman Alzahem, King Saud University
- Investigators
- Abdulrahman Alzahem, MBBS, FRCSC, Principal investigator, King Saud University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02587208
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- E14-1270
- Status last verified
- Oct 2015
- First submitted
- 30 Aug 2015
- Last updated
- 27 Oct 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Oct 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Plastibell Versus Conventional Dissection Techniques for Circumcision in Infants
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02587208
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- E14-1270
- Conditions
- Circumcision, Male
- Keywords
- circumcision, plastibell, infants, open sleeve
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- King Saud UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2015
- Primary completion
- Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2016 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Outcome of circumcision with Plastibell or conventional dissection techniques in infants and children: A prospective randomized controlled trial
Aim: to evaluate and compare postoperative and esthetic outcomes after Plastibell and conventional dissection circumcision
Methods:
Randomized Controlled Trial Inclusion criteria: patients younger than 13 years including neonates who required circumcision for various indications.
Exclusion criteria: - patients with bleeding or clotting disorders
- Those whose parents insisted on a particular type of surgery
- Children with lateral- lateral diameter of the glans over which a Plastibell device could not be placed Primary endpoint: parental concerns and satisfaction (questionnaire) Secondary endpoints: composite morbidity, operative time, postoperative pain (analgesic requirements)
- Early postoperative problems: infection, bleeding, swelling, dysuria, pain (incidence, mean duration, emergency care if necessary, parental concerns about them (on a Likert-type 5-point scale [ not at all, a little, rather, very, very much])
- Irregular scar, jumbling of tissues at the site of frenulum (assessed by physician)
- Postoperative adhesions (assessed by physician)
- Postoperative pain and analgesic requirements (paracetamol 15 mg/kg PO Q6 hrs for 48 hrs then PRN) number of doses and days required for analgesia as judged by parents, VAS ( >- 6 SCORE ), Kaplan-Meier analysis (time to event)
- Parental satisfaction ( overall esthetic outcome [ very much satisfied, very satisfied, rather, a little satisfied, not at all satisfied])
- Parental satisfaction ( skin removal): excess skin removal, insufficient skin removal [ not at all, a little, rather, very, very much]
- Time for bell separation (mean +-SD), Kaplan-Meier analysis for different age groups
Detailed description
Outcome of circumcision with Plastibell or conventional dissection techniques in infants and children: A prospective randomized controlled trial Aim: to evaluate and compare postoperative and esthetic outcomes after Plastibell and conventional dissection circumcision
Methods:
A balanced, parallel group, prospective randomized controlled trial is to be performed over 2 years at our institute. Patients enrollment will commence after approval of our institutional review board as well as obtaining informed consent from the patient's legal guardians.
Participants Inclusion criteria: Patients younger than 13 years including neonates who required circumcision for various indications.
Exclusion criteria: - Patients with bleeding or clotting disorders
- Patients with hypospadias or other penile anomalies
- Those whose parents insisted on a particular type of surgery
- Children with lateral- lateral diameter of the glans over which a Plastibell device could not be placed Interventions The subjects will be randomized and allocated into two groups: the Plastibell and sleeve dissection techniques.
Sample size calculation Power calculation was based on aesthetic outcome which was based on previous studies (Nagdeve et al and Fraser et al) wherein 60-69% of subjects operated by Plastibell technique and 43-45% by conventional dissection technique had good satisfaction. Establishing alpha at 0.2 and a power of 0.80 produced a sample size of 50 patients per arm.
Assignment and randomization A block randomization scheme will be used with equal allocation of subjects to the Plastibell and sleeve dissection groups. There are a total of 10 blocks, each having 10 subjects. One block will be selected by simple random sampling and its subjects will be subjected to the intervention.
Protocol All the parents will be informed regarding details of surgery, complications, postoperative care and follow-up protocol. Both procedures are performed under light general anesthesia and either dorsal penile nerve block or caudal block. The first step in both groups is to separate the foreskin from the glans penis and removal of smegma.
In the Plastibell group, the size of the device is chosen according to the lateral-lateral diameter of the glans. A dorsal slit incision is made and then the foreskin is pulled up and the Plastibell device placed between the prepuce and the glans. A non-absorbable string was tightly tied around the device and the distal prepuce is removed.
In the sleeve dissection group, a double incision technique on both outer and inner layers of the foreskin is employed. Hemostasis is achieved by bipolar diathermy, and cut edges are sutured with 5/0 rapide vicryl.
All patients will be managed on a day-care basis. At discharge, they will be prescribed syrup/tablet paracetamol 15mg/kg/dose every 6 hours whenever needed if pain score >_6 based on a visual analog scale for pain assessment. Parents will be told to write down how many times they give analgesic each day until the first postoperative visit.
Follow-up will be done at 14th (or after separation of Plastibell whichever later) and 90th days after surgery.
Written questionnaires will be given to parents at time of discharge Primary endpoint: Parental concerns and satisfaction (questionnaire) Secondary endpoints: Composite Morbidity, Operative Time, Postoperative Pain (analgesic requirements)
- Early postoperative problems: infection, bleeding, swelling, dysuria, pain (incidence, mean duration, emergency care if necessary, parental concerns about them (on a Likert-type 5-point scale [not at all, a little, rather, very, very much])
- Irregular scar, jumbling of tissues at the site of frenulum (assessed by physician)
- Postoperative adhesions (assessed by physician)
- Postoperative pain and analgesic requirements (paracetamol 15 mg/kg PO Q6 hrs PRN) number of doses and days required for analgesia as judged by parents, VAS ( >- 6 SCORE ), Kaplan-Meier analysis (time to event)
- Parental satisfaction ( overall esthetic outcome [ very much satisfied, very satisfied, rather, a little satisfied, not at all satisfied])
- Parental satisfaction ( skin removal): excess skin removal, insufficient skin removal [ not at all, a little, rather, very, very much]
- Time for bell separation (mean +-SD), Kaplan-Meier analysis for different age groups
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| conventional sleeve | Active comparator | Procedure: conventional sleeveIn the sleeve dissection group, a double incision technique on both outer and inner layers of the foreskin is employed. Hemostasis is achieved by bipolar diathermy, and cut edges are sutured with 5/0 rapide vicryl. |
| plastibell | Active comparator | Device: PlastibellIn the Plastibell group, the size of the device is chosen according to the lateral-lateral diameter of the glans. A dorsal slit incision is made and then the foreskin is pulled up and the Plastibell device placed between the prepuce and the glans. A non-absorbable string was tightly tied around the device and the distal prepuce is removed. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 3 months to 12 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients 3 months - 12 years (inclusive) who required circumcision for various indications.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients with bleeding or clotting disorders
- Those whose parents insisted on a particular type of surgery
- Children with lateral- lateral diameter of the glans over which a Plastibell device could not be placed
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PlastibellIn the Plastibell group, the size of the device is chosen according to the lateral-lateral diameter of the glans. A dorsal slit incision is made and then the foreskin is pulled up and the Plastibell device placed between the prepuce and the glans. A non-absorbable string was tightly tied around the device and the distal prepuce is removed. | Device | plastibell |
| conventional sleeveIn the sleeve dissection group, a double incision technique on both outer and inner layers of the foreskin is employed. Hemostasis is achieved by bipolar diathermy, and cut edges are sutured with 5/0 rapide vicryl. | Procedure or surgery | conventional sleeve |
Primary outcome
Questionnaire for Parental satisfaction (overal esthetic outcome)
Time frame: 3-6 months
- Parental satisfaction ( overall esthetic outcome [ very much satisfied, very satisfied, rather, a little satisfied, not at all satisfied])
3 secondary outcomes
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Postoperative pain measures
Time frame: 1-2 weeks
Early composite morbidity (incidence % and mean duration)
Time frame: 2-4 weeks
Likert -type 5-point scale for Parental concerns about early composite morbidity
Time frame: 2-4 weeks
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Oct 2015.
Related trials for Circumcision, Male
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Preoperative Fasting and Perioperative Outcomes in Children Undergoing Elective Circumcision
Preoperative Fasting, Perioperative Anxiety
Active, not recruiting
A Study Comparing The Effect Of Local Application Of Polyfax Versus Coconut Oil On Outcome Of Plastibell Circumcision In A Tertiary Care Hospital
Circumcision, Male
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Therapeutic Touch and Music on Children's Anxiety, Pain, and Nausea Before and After Circumcision
Circumcision
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Efficacy and Safety of Circumcision Alone on Risk of Febrile Urinary Tract Infections in Boys With Posterior Urethral Valves: a Prospective Randomized Open-label Multicentric Trial Enriched With Historic Controls.
Posterior Urethral Valves
Recruiting
Compared Reversed US-Guided Dorsal Penile Nerve Block (RUSDPNB) With DPNB in Circumcisions for Pediatric Patients
Circumcision, Ultrasound
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Abdulrahman Alzahem, MBBS, FRCSC principal investigator
King Saud University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Plastibell and conventional sleeve in people with Circumcision, Male, run by King Saud University at 1 site in Saudi Arabia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Oct 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Saudi Arabia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Abdulrahman Alzahem, MBBS, FRCSC (+966114695277, aalzahem@ksu.edu.sa), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Questionnaire for Parental satisfaction (overal esthetic outcome) (time frame: 3-6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Oct 2015.