AzTrials
AzTrials

Pulmonary AtelectasisNCT02584023

Lung Ultrasound and Alveolar Recruitment in Mechanically Ventilated Infants

A study testing Lung ultrasound in people with Pulmonary Atelectasis, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Investigators hypothesized that lung ultrasound-assisted recruitment maneuver would be beneficial in mechanically ventilated infants compared to those who did not receive lung ultrasound and alveolar recruitment maneuver. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 day to 1 year
Conditions the study is for
Pulmonary Atelectasis
What is being tested?
Lung ultrasound
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
Oct 2015to Jan 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 day to 1 year
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Minor surgery less than 2 hours under general anesthesia
  • Mechanically ventilated after endotracheal intubation

Who cannot join

  • History of surgery on the lungs
  • Laparoscopic surgery
  • Abnormal preoperative chest radiograph findings including atelectasis, pneumothorax, pleural effusion, and pneumonia
  • Considered inappropriate by the investigator

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Korea1 site
  • Seoul National University Hospital

    Seoul, Seoul, 110-744

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: Preventive Effect of Lung Ultrasound and Alveolar Recruitment on Atelectasis in Mechanically Ventilated Infants

Investigators hypothesized that lung ultrasound-assisted recruitment maneuver would be beneficial in mechanically ventilated infants compared to those who did not receive lung ultrasound and alveolar recruitment maneuver.

Being tested
Lung ultrasound
Keywords
ultrasonography, infant, perioperative period, general anesthesia
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Atelectasis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Lung ultrasoundDevice

    Lung ultrasound on both hemithorax in supine position

Study groups in NCT02584023
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ControlPlacebo comparatorNo intervention during the perioperative period. Perform lung ultrasound twice only for the diagnostic purpose after the endotracheal intubation and and at the end of surgery.
Receives: Device: Lung ultrasound
Alveolar recruitmentActive comparatorPerform lung ultrasound twice during the perioperative period after the endotracheal intubation and and at the end of surgery. Conduct alveolar recruitment maneuver after first lung ultrasound assessment.
Receives: Device: Lung ultrasound

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Postoperative incidence of pulmonary atelectasis

    Measured: within the first day after the surgery

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Intraoperative incidence of pulmonary atelectasis after endotracheal intubation

    Measured: from the moment of endotracheal intubation until the end of surgery, up to 6 hours

  2. Intraoperative incidence of pulse oximetry (SpO2) ≤ 95% (or 10% below the baseline value)

    Measured: from the induction of general anesthesia until the end of the surgery, up to 6 hours

  3. Postoperative incidence of pulse oximetry (SpO2) ≤ 95% (or 10% below the baseline value)

    Measured: within the first day after the surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Oct 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2015
  3. Primary completionJan 2016
  4. Study completionJan 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02584023
Sponsor's protocol ID
H-1509-063-703
Status last verified
Jun 2016
First submitted
20 Oct 2015
Last updated
22 Jun 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Lutterbey G, Wattjes MP, Doerr D, Fischer NJ, Gieseke J Jr, Schild HH. Atelectasis in children undergoing either propofol infusion or positive pressure ventilation anesthesia for magnetic resonance imaging. Paediatr Anaesth. 2007 Feb;17(2):121-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2006.02045.x.

    PubMed 17238882
  • Magnusson L, Spahn DR. New concepts of atelectasis during general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2003 Jul;91(1):61-72. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeg085. No abstract available.

    PubMed 12821566
  • Tusman G, Bohm SH, Tempra A, Melkun F, Garcia E, Turchetto E, Mulder PG, Lachmann B. Effects of recruitment maneuver on atelectasis in anesthetized children. Anesthesiology. 2003 Jan;98(1):14-22. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200301000-00006.

    PubMed 12502973
  • Ashton-Cleary DT. Is thoracic ultrasound a viable alternative to conventional imaging in the critical care setting? Br J Anaesth. 2013 Aug;111(2):152-60. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet076. Epub 2013 Apr 12.

    PubMed 23585400
  • Kiley S, Cassara C, Fahy BG. Lung ultrasound in the intensive care unit. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015 Feb;29(1):196-203. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2014.10.017. No abstract available.

    PubMed 25620145
  • Acosta CM, Maidana GA, Jacovitti D, Belaunzaran A, Cereceda S, Rae E, Molina A, Gonorazky S, Bohm SH, Tusman G. Accuracy of transthoracic lung ultrasound for diagnosing anesthesia-induced atelectasis in children. Anesthesiology. 2014 Jun;120(6):1370-9. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000231.

    PubMed 24662376

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Lung ultrasound in people with Pulmonary Atelectasis, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jun 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Postoperative incidence of pulmonary atelectasis (time frame: within the first day after the surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02584023, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jun 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in