AzTrials
AzTrials

Leber Congenital Amaurosis (LCA)NCT02575430

Natural History Study in Inherited Retinal Disease Subjects Caused by Mutations in RPE65 or LRAT

An observational study of Leber Congenital Amaurosis (LCA) and Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP), run by QLT Inc. at 9 sites in 7 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To evaluate the natural history of visual function in subjects with IRD phenotypically diagnosed as Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) or retinitis pigmentosa (RP) caused by RPE65 or LRAT gene mutations. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 8 years and older
What is being tested?
No treatment: retrospective chart review
How many people
59 participants
Where
9 sitesin 7 countries
Study dates
Dec 2015to Mar 2016
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 8 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Subjects with IRD phenotypically diagnosed as LCA or RP caused by autosomal recessive mutation in RPE65 or LRAT.

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female subjects aged 8 or older with IRD (LCA or RP) caused by inherited autosomal recessive mutation in either RPE65 or LRAT.
  • Subjects who have at least 2 documented kinetic visual field assessments of the same isopter(s) in at least one eye performed at least 2 years apart on the same type of equipment when the subject was between the ages of 6 and 65 years.
  • If applicable, subjects who provide informed consent for the study (the requirement for informed consent may be applicable to all sites or may be waived by the IRB and/or local regulations). The parent or guardian must sign an approved informed consent form for the study for subjects younger than the age of majority.

Who cannot join

  • Subjects, who in the Investigator's opinion, have any severe acute or chronic medical condition, psychiatric condition, physical examination finding or laboratory abnormality that may interfere with the interpretation of their visual function data.
  • Subjects with concomitant bilateral ocular disorders that may affect visual acuity or visual fields (e.g., advanced glaucoma, optic neuritis, anterior ischemic optic neuropathy, advanced cataract, intraocular surgery).

Trial locations and contacts

9 sites in 7 countries.

9 sites in 7 countries

United States2 sites
  • Wilmer Eye Institute - Johns Hopkins Hospital

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21287

  • Casey Eye Institute - Marquam Hill

    Portland, Oregon, 97239-4197

Other trials in United States

Canada2 sites
  • Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University Health Centre

    Montreal, Quebec, H4A 3J1

  • The Hospital for Sick Children, Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences

    Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X8

Other trials in Canada

Denmark1 site
  • Glostrup Hospital and National Eye Clinic at the Kennedy Center

    Glostrup Municipality, Copenhagen

Other trials in Denmark

Germany1 site
  • STZ Eyetrial at the Department of Ophthalmology - University of Tübingen

    Tübingen, 72076

Other trials in Germany

Netherlands1 site
  • Rotterdam Ophthalmic Institute

    Rotterdam, 3011 BH

Other trials in Netherlands

Switzerland1 site
  • Jules Gonin Eye Hospital - Oculogenetic Unit

    Lausanne, CH-1004

Other trials in Switzerland

United Kingdom1 site
  • Moorfields Eye Hospital - Research and Treatment Centre

    London, EC1V 2PD

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Retrospective, Uncontrolled, Multicenter, Case History Study to Determine the Natural History of Visual Function in Subjects With Inherited Retinal Disease (IRD) Caused by Inherited Mutation of Retinal Pigment Epithelial 65 Protein (RPE65) or Lecithin:Retinol Acyltransferase (LRAT)

To evaluate the natural history of visual function in subjects with IRD phenotypically diagnosed as Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) or retinitis pigmentosa (RP) caused by RPE65 or LRAT gene mutations.

Read the detailed description

This is a retrospective, uncontrolled, multicenter, case history study to determine the natural history of visual function in patients with IRD phenotypically diagnosed as LCA or RP caused by autosomal recessive mutation in RPE65 or LRAT.

Up to 60 subjects will be enrolled in this study at approximately 12 study centers in Canada, the US and Europe.

Being tested
No treatment: retrospective chart review
Medical subject headings
Leber Congenital Amaurosis, Retinitis Pigmentosa

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • No treatment: retrospective chart reviewOther

Study groups in NCT02575430
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Subjects with IRDIRD phenotypically diagnosed as Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) or retinitis pigmentosa (RP) caused by RPE65 or LRAT gene mutations.
Receives: Other: No treatment: retrospective chart review

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Visual field

    Measured: Change in visual field over time. Previous assessments performed when subject was between the ages of 6 and 65 years

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Visual acuity

    Measured: Change in visual acuity over time. Previous assessments performed when subject was between the ages of 6 and 65 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Oct 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2015
  3. Primary completionMar 2016
  4. Study completionMar 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
59 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02575430
Sponsor's protocol ID
RET NAT 01
Status last verified
Apr 2016
First submitted
9 Oct 2015
Last updated
29 Apr 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Leber Congenital Amaurosis (LCA) and Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP), run by QLT Inc. at 9 sites in 7 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 9 sites in United States, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Netherlands and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Visual field (time frame: Change in visual field over time. Previous assessments performed when subject was between the ages of 6 and 65 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in