Diabetes MellitusNCT02569151
20 Years Results by HBP and DBP in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus After Following-up
An observational study of Diabetes Mellitus, run by Kyuzi Kamoi.
Trial summary
Participants were examined using the methods reported previous. All chemical laboratory data were obtained at each clinic visit in the morning in a non-fasting state. A single specimen at each visit was used to assess urinary albumin levels based on the 2009 guidelines of the ADA. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes Mellitus
- What is being tested?
- HBP & CBP measurement using systo 130 mmHg
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 600 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Apr 2016to Apr 2027
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: 600 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Who may be able to join
- Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Who cannot join
- Patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and with other diseases except diabetes mellitus
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: USEFULNESS OF MORNING HOME BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS IN JAPANESE PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS: RESULTS OF A 20-YEARS, PROSPECTIVE, LONGITUDINAL STUDY
Participants were examined using the methods reported previous. All chemical laboratory data were obtained at each clinic visit in the morning in a non-fasting state. A single specimen at each visit was used to assess urinary albumin levels based on the 2009 guidelines of the ADA. CBP was measured once in each clinic visit. HBP was measured every day in the morning within 10 minutes after awakening in the sitting position, but HBP value assessed for this study used the value measured once in the same morning at each clinic visit.
Clinic hypertension (CH) and morning hypertension (MH) were defined as systolic BP (SBP) 130 mmHg and/or diastolic BP (DBP) 85 mmHg; clinic normotension (CN) and morning normotension (MN) were defined as SBP <130 mmHg and DBP <85 mmHg, respectively. The reason underlying that same threshold was used for both clinic and morning values was based on criteria of the 1999 WHO-International Society of Hypertension guidelines, because this study started in 1999. Based on HBP, subjects were divided into MH and MN patients, and anti-hypertensive drug use was determined in each group. In addition, based on CBP, subjects were divided into CH and CN patients. These patients were followed using the same methods used for MH and MN patients.
Read more
Outcome considered only the first event in each subject. Primary end-point was death from any cause. Secondary end-points were new, worsened, or improved microvascular and macrovascular events.
Risk factors related to each outcome were determined, and therapy which was added to baseline used for each disease in patients with MH was recorded at base- and end-points.
All results are presented as means ± SD. Mean values were compared using the paired or unpaired student t test. To compare the prevalence of events or medical treatment in patients with and without HT on basis of HBP or CBP, Fisher's exact test with two-tailed P values was used, and then hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals were calculated.
Differences in outcomes between patients with HT and NT on basis of HBP or CBP at base- and end-points in the home or in the clinic, respectively, were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and then compared by hazard rate using the log-rank test.
Risk factors determined to be statistically related to outcomes were assessed by Cox proportional hazard analysis.
Read the detailed description
Microalbuminuria and clinical albuminuria were defined as urinary albumin excretion rate 30 mg/g creatinine and 300 mg/g creatinine, respectively (6).
CBP was measured once in each clinic visit. HBP was measured every day in the morning within 10 minutes after awakening in the sitting position, but HBP value assessed for this study used the value measured once in the same morning at each clinic visit.
Clinic hypertension (CH) and morning hypertension (MH) were defined as systolic BP (SBP) 130 mmHg and/or diastolic BP (DBP) 85 mmHg; clinic normotension (CN) and morning normotension (MN) were defined as SBP <130 mmHg and DBP <85 mmHg, respectively. .
Microvascular complications included nephropathy, neuropathy, and retinopathy. Severity of nephropathy was determined based on albuminuria using four categories: normal, 0 points; microalbuminuria, 1 point; clinical albuminuria, 2 points; and dialysis, 3 points. Severity of neuropathy was categorized as normal, 0 points; chronic sensorimotor distal symmetric polyneuropathy and/or cardiac autonomic neuropathy, 1 point. Severity of retinopathy was determined using four categories: normal, 0 points; simple, 1 point; pre-proliferative, 2 points; and proliferative, 3 points. Development of new, worsened, or improved microangiopathy was defined according to a change of at least one step from baseline.
Macrovascular complications included coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease and peripheral artery obstruction. Severity of macrovascular events was categorized using two categories: normal, 0 points; and coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, or peripheral artery obstruction, 1 point (3). New, worsened (recurrent), or improved events were defined based on clinical manifestations and treatment throughout the study.
For ethical reasons, patients were treated with various anti-hypertensive, anti-diabetic, anti-dyslipidemia, anti-hypercoagulation and other agents during course of the study by their own doctors.
Outcome results considered only the first event in each subject (3). Primary end-point was death from any cause (3). Secondary end-points were new, worsened, or improved microvascular and macrovascular events (3).
- Risk factor assessment for outcomes. Risk factors at end-point in ? participants related to each outcome were determined, and therapy which was added to baseline therapy used for each disease in patients with MH was recorded at base- and end-points (3). The 6-month interval minimizes bias due to the fall or rise in the HBP or CBP measurement (10).
Statistical analysis.
- Baseline. All results are presented as means ± SD. Mean values were compared using the paired or unpaired student t test. To compare the prevalence of micro- and macrovascular complications or medical treatment in patients with and without HT on basis of HBP or CBP (3), Fisher's exact test with two-tailed P values was used, and then hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals were calculatein.
End-points and outcome measures. Differences in outcomes for each end-point of death, and micro- and macrovascular complications between patients with HT and NT on basis of HBP or CBP at base- and end-points in the home or in the clinic, respectively, were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and then compared by hazard rate using the log-rank test.
Risk factor assessment for outcomes. Risk factors determined to be statistically related to outcomes were assessed by Cox proportional hazard analysis.
Analysis was performed using the Prism version software (GraphPad Software, CA, USA) and the Statistical Package for the Bioscience (ComWorks Co,Tokyo,Japan). Two-tailed values of P<0.05 were considered statistically significant.
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus
- Being tested
- HBP & CBP measurement using systo 130 mmHg
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HBP & CBP measurement using systo 130 mmHgDevice
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Death
Measured: 20 years
Secondary outcomes (1)
new, worsened, or improved microvascular and macrovascular events
Measured: 20 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2016
- Primary completionMar 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionApr 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diabetes MellitusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 600 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Kyuzi Kamoi
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Kyuzi Kamoi, Nagaoka Red Cross Hospital
- Investigators
- Kyuzi Kamoi, MD, Principal investigator, Jyoetsu General Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02569151
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 9-Kamoi
- Status last verified
- Oct 2015
- First submitted
- 5 Oct 2015
- Last updated
- 6 Oct 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Kamoi K, Miyakoshi M, Soda S, Kaneko S, Nakagawa O. Usefulness of home blood pressure measurement in the morning in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2002 Dec;25(12):2218-23. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.12.2218.
PubMed 12453964Kamoi K. Usefulness of morning home blood pressure measurements in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: results of a 10-year, prospective, longitudinal study. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2015;37(2):122-7. doi: 10.3109/10641963.2014.913606. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
PubMed 24786228
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Oct 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- USEFULNESS OF MORNING HOME BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS IN JAPANESE PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS: RESULTS OF A 20-YEARS, PROSPECTIVE, LONGITUDINAL STUDY
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02569151
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 9-Kamoi
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 600 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Kyuzi KamoiUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Apr 2016
- Primary completion
- Mar 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Apr 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Participants were examined using the methods reported previous. All chemical laboratory data were obtained at each clinic visit in the morning in a non-fasting state. A single specimen at each visit was used to assess urinary albumin levels based on the 2009 guidelines of the ADA. CBP was measured once in each clinic visit. HBP was measured every day in the morning within 10 minutes after awakening in the sitting position, but HBP value assessed for this study used the value measured once in the same morning at each clinic visit.
Clinic hypertension (CH) and morning hypertension (MH) were defined as systolic BP (SBP) 130 mmHg and/or diastolic BP (DBP) 85 mmHg; clinic normotension (CN) and morning normotension (MN) were defined as SBP <130 mmHg and DBP <85 mmHg, respectively. The reason underlying that same threshold was used for both clinic and morning values was based on criteria of the 1999 WHO-International Society of Hypertension guidelines, because this study started in 1999. Based on HBP, subjects were divided into MH and MN patients, and anti-hypertensive drug use was determined in each group. In addition, based on CBP, subjects were divided into CH and CN patients. These patients were followed using the same methods used for MH and MN patients.
Outcome considered only the first event in each subject. Primary end-point was death from any cause. Secondary end-points were new, worsened, or improved microvascular and macrovascular events.
Risk factors related to each outcome were determined, and therapy which was added to baseline used for each disease in patients with MH was recorded at base- and end-points.
All results are presented as means ± SD. Mean values were compared using the paired or unpaired student t test. To compare the prevalence of events or medical treatment in patients with and without HT on basis of HBP or CBP, Fisher's exact test with two-tailed P values was used, and then hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals were calculated.
Differences in outcomes between patients with HT and NT on basis of HBP or CBP at base- and end-points in the home or in the clinic, respectively, were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and then compared by hazard rate using the log-rank test.
Risk factors determined to be statistically related to outcomes were assessed by Cox proportional hazard analysis.
Detailed description
Microalbuminuria and clinical albuminuria were defined as urinary albumin excretion rate 30 mg/g creatinine and 300 mg/g creatinine, respectively (6).
CBP was measured once in each clinic visit. HBP was measured every day in the morning within 10 minutes after awakening in the sitting position, but HBP value assessed for this study used the value measured once in the same morning at each clinic visit.
Clinic hypertension (CH) and morning hypertension (MH) were defined as systolic BP (SBP) 130 mmHg and/or diastolic BP (DBP) 85 mmHg; clinic normotension (CN) and morning normotension (MN) were defined as SBP <130 mmHg and DBP <85 mmHg, respectively. .
Microvascular complications included nephropathy, neuropathy, and retinopathy. Severity of nephropathy was determined based on albuminuria using four categories: normal, 0 points; microalbuminuria, 1 point; clinical albuminuria, 2 points; and dialysis, 3 points. Severity of neuropathy was categorized as normal, 0 points; chronic sensorimotor distal symmetric polyneuropathy and/or cardiac autonomic neuropathy, 1 point. Severity of retinopathy was determined using four categories: normal, 0 points; simple, 1 point; pre-proliferative, 2 points; and proliferative, 3 points. Development of new, worsened, or improved microangiopathy was defined according to a change of at least one step from baseline.
Macrovascular complications included coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease and peripheral artery obstruction. Severity of macrovascular events was categorized using two categories: normal, 0 points; and coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, or peripheral artery obstruction, 1 point (3). New, worsened (recurrent), or improved events were defined based on clinical manifestations and treatment throughout the study.
For ethical reasons, patients were treated with various anti-hypertensive, anti-diabetic, anti-dyslipidemia, anti-hypercoagulation and other agents during course of the study by their own doctors.
Outcome results considered only the first event in each subject (3). Primary end-point was death from any cause (3). Secondary end-points were new, worsened, or improved microvascular and macrovascular events (3).
- Risk factor assessment for outcomes. Risk factors at end-point in ? participants related to each outcome were determined, and therapy which was added to baseline therapy used for each disease in patients with MH was recorded at base- and end-points (3). The 6-month interval minimizes bias due to the fall or rise in the HBP or CBP measurement (10).
Statistical analysis.
- Baseline. All results are presented as means ± SD. Mean values were compared using the paired or unpaired student t test. To compare the prevalence of micro- and macrovascular complications or medical treatment in patients with and without HT on basis of HBP or CBP (3), Fisher's exact test with two-tailed P values was used, and then hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals were calculatein.
End-points and outcome measures. Differences in outcomes for each end-point of death, and micro- and macrovascular complications between patients with HT and NT on basis of HBP or CBP at base- and end-points in the home or in the clinic, respectively, were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and then compared by hazard rate using the log-rank test.
Risk factor assessment for outcomes. Risk factors determined to be statistically related to outcomes were assessed by Cox proportional hazard analysis.
Analysis was performed using the Prism version software (GraphPad Software, CA, USA) and the Statistical Package for the Bioscience (ComWorks Co,Tokyo,Japan). Two-tailed values of P<0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- 600 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and with other diseases except diabetes mellitus
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| HBP & CBP measurement using systo 130 mmHg | Device | – |
Primary outcome
Death
Time frame: 20 years
1 secondary outcome
new, worsened, or improved microvascular and macrovascular events
Time frame: 20 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Oct 2015.
- Background: PubMed 12453964Kamoi K, Miyakoshi M, Soda S, Kaneko S, Nakagawa O. Usefulness of home blood pressure measurement in the morning in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2002 Dec;25(12):2218-23. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.12.2218.
- Background: PubMed 24786228Kamoi K. Usefulness of morning home blood pressure measurements in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: results of a 10-year, prospective, longitudinal study. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2015;37(2):122-7. doi: 10.3109/10641963.2014.913606. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
Related trials for Diabetes Mellitus
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Effects of Lean Pork Loin Intake on Protein Homeostasis and Glucose Regulation in Prediabetic Adults
Hyperglycaemia (Non Diabetic), Prediabetes
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Kyuzi Kamoi, MD principal investigator
Jyoetsu General Hospital
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Diabetes Mellitus, run by Kyuzi Kamoi.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Oct 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Kyuzi Kamoi, MD (+81-0258-36-3968, kkam-int@echigo.ne.jp), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Death (time frame: 20 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02569151, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Oct 2015.