Hay FeverPhase 3NCT02560948
Clinical Efficacy and Safety of a Subcutaneous Immunotherapy With gpASIT+™ in Patients With Grass Pollen-induced Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis
A Phase 3 study testing gpASIT+TM in people with Hay Fever, run by BioTech Tools S.A. at 3 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
gpASIT+TM product is based on highly purified allergen fragments obtained from grass pollen. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the clinical efficacy and safety of a subcutaneous immunotherapy with gpASIT+™ in patients with grass pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis compared to placebo. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 64 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hay Fever
- What is being tested?
- gpASIT+TM
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 554 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- Dec 2015to Aug 2016
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 64 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Allergy diagnosis:
- A medical history of moderate to severe seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (SARC) for the grass pollen season during at least the two previous seasons (definition of allergy severity according to ARIA (Bousquet et al 2001))
- A positive skin prick test (SPT - wheal diameter ≥ 3 mm) to grass pollen mixture, histamine wheal ≥ 3 mm, NaCl control reaction < 2 mm
- Specific IgE against grass pollen (with recombinant allergens - g213) > 0.7 kU/L
- Positive response to CPT with at least 10,000 SQ-E/mL of grass allergens
- Patients treated with anti-allergic medication for at least 2 grass pollen seasons prior to enrollment
- For asthmatic patients: confirmed diagnosis of controlled asthma according to Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines (steps 1-3, GINA 2014)
Who cannot join
- Previous immunotherapy with grass allergens within the last 5 years
- Ongoing immunotherapy with grass allergens or any other allergens
- Patients with a history of anaphylaxis, including food (e.g. peanut or marine animals) or hymenoptera venom (e.g. bee or wasp stings) or medication (e.g. penicillin)
- Patients with partly controlled or uncontrolled asthma according to GINA guidelines (GINA 2014)
- Patients with chronic asthma or emphysema, particularly with a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) < 80% of the predicted value (ECSC) or with a peak expiratory flow (PEF) < 70% of the individual optimum value
- Patients symptomatic to inhaled allergens circulating during the grass pollen season (specific to each country: e.g. birch, hazel, mugwort, ragweed, olive, Alternaria alternata)
- Patients symptomatic to perennial inhaled allergens (house dust mites, cat, dog) to which the patients are regularly exposed
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 3 countries.
3 sites in 3 countries
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter, International, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Demonstrate the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of a Subcutaneous Immunotherapy With gpASIT+™ in Patients With Grass Pollen-induced Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis
gpASIT+TM product is based on highly purified allergen fragments obtained from grass pollen. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the clinical efficacy and safety of a subcutaneous immunotherapy with gpASIT+™ in patients with grass pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis compared to placebo.
- Conditions
- Hay Fever
- Being tested
- Placebo solution, gpASIT+TM
- Medical subject headings
- Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Placebo solutionBiological
4 x 2 injections over 21 days
gpASIT+TMBiological
4 x 2 injections over 21 days
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Biological: Placebo solution |
| gpASIT+TM | Experimental | Not described Receives: Biological: gpASIT+TM |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Combined Symptom and Medication Score (CSMS)
Measured: over the peak (corresponding to 14 consecutive days with highest pollen counts) of grass pollen season estimated between 3 and 6 months after treatment
Secondary outcomes (15)
Combined Symptom and Medication Score (CSMS)
Measured: over the entire grass pollen season estimated between 3 and 6 months after treatment
Symptom sub-scores (Eyes, Nose)
Measured: over the peak period (14 consecutive days with highest pollen counts within grass pollen season) and over the pollen season estimated between 3 and 6 months after treatment
Well days: number of days with symptomatic score below or equal to 2 and no rescue medication
Measured: over the peak period (14 consecutive days with highest pollen counts within grass pollen season) and over the pollen season estimated between 3 and 6 months after treatment
Lung Symptom Score (LLS: the average of coughing, wheezing, chest tightness and exercise induced dyspnoea scores) in asthmatic patients
Measured: over the peak period (14 consecutive days with highest pollen counts within grass pollen season) and over the pollen season estimated between 3 and 6 months after treatment
Total Symptom Score (TSS: the sum of the nose, eye and lung scores) in asthmatic patients
Measured: over the peak period (14 consecutive days with highest pollen counts within grass pollen season) and the pollen season estimated between 3 and 6 months after treatment
Use of rescue medication to relief asthma symptoms in asthmatic patients
Measured: over the peak period (14 consecutive days with highest pollen counts within grass pollen season) and the pollen season estimated between 3 and 6 months after treatment
Conjunctival Provocation Test (CPT) outcomes
Measured: at baseline and up to 6 weeks
Standardized Quality-of-Life Questionnaires for asthma and rhinoconjunctivitis
Measured: between 2 weeks and 8 months after treatment
Number of working day lost due to grass pollen induced-allergy symptoms
Measured: between 2 weeks and 8 months after treatment
Loss of productivity at work due to grass pollen induced-allergy symptoms, using a visual analog scale (VAS)
Measured: between 2 weeks and 8 months after treatment
Solicited adverse events
- Local reactions at the injection site (swelling and redness)
- Allergic systemic reactions
Measured: up to 4 weeks
Unsolicited adverse events and serious adverse events
Measured: up to 8 months
Physical examinations and vital signs
Measured: up to 8 months
Laboratory investigations (haematology, clinical biochemistry, immunological parameters)
Measured: up to 8 months
Use of rescue medication
Measured: up to 4 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Sep 2015 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2015
- Primary completionAug 2016
- Study completionAug 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hay FeverStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 554 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- BioTech Tools S.A.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ralph Mösges, Professor, Principal investigator, Private practice, Aachen, GermanyClaus Bachert, Professor, Principal investigator, UZ Gent, Gent, BelgiumPetr Panzner, MD, Principal investigator, University Hospital of Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech RepublicFrédéric de Blay, Professor, Principal investigator, CHRU de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, FranceEnrico Iemoli, MD, Principal investigator, Clinica dell'Azienda Ospedaliera Luigi Sacco Di Milano, Milano, ItalyJoachin Sastre, Professor, Principal investigator, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid,Spain
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02560948
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BTT-gpASIT009
- Status last verified
- Sep 2015
- First submitted
- 23 Sep 2015
- Last updated
- 11 Oct 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Sharif H, Singh I, Kouser L, Mosges R, Bonny MA, Karamani A, Parkin RV, Bovy N, Kishore U, Robb A, Katotomichelakis M, Holtappels G, Derycke L, Corazza F, von Frenckell R, Wathelet N, Duchateau J, Legon T, Pirotton S, Durham SR, Bachert C, Shamji MH. Immunologic mechanisms of a short-course of Lolium perenne peptide immunotherapy: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019 Sep;144(3):738-749. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.02.023. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
PubMed 30844425
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Oct 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter, International, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Demonstrate the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of a Subcutaneous Immunotherapy With gpASIT+™ in Patients With Grass Pollen-induced Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02560948
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BTT-gpASIT009
- Conditions
- Hay Fever
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 554 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- BioTech Tools S.A.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Dec 2015
- Primary completion
- Aug 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Sep 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
gpASIT+TM product is based on highly purified allergen fragments obtained from grass pollen. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the clinical efficacy and safety of a subcutaneous immunotherapy with gpASIT+™ in patients with grass pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis compared to placebo.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Biological: Placebo solution |
| gpASIT+TM | Experimental | Biological: gpASIT+TM |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 64 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Allergy diagnosis:
- Patients treated with anti-allergic medication for at least 2 grass pollen seasons prior to enrollment
- For asthmatic patients: confirmed diagnosis of controlled asthma according to Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines (steps 1-3, GINA 2014)
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Previous immunotherapy with grass allergens within the last 5 years
- Ongoing immunotherapy with grass allergens or any other allergens
- Patients with a history of anaphylaxis, including food (e.g. peanut or marine animals) or hymenoptera venom (e.g. bee or wasp stings) or medication (e.g. penicillin)
- Patients with partly controlled or uncontrolled asthma according to GINA guidelines (GINA 2014)
- Patients with chronic asthma or emphysema, particularly with a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) < 80% of the predicted value (ECSC) or with a peak expiratory flow (PEF) < 70% of the individual optimum value
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo solution4 x 2 injections over 21 days | Biological | Placebo |
| gpASIT+TM4 x 2 injections over 21 days | Biological | gpASIT+TM |
Primary outcome
Combined Symptom and Medication Score (CSMS)
Time frame: over the peak (corresponding to 14 consecutive days with highest pollen counts) of grass pollen season estimated between 3 and 6 months after treatment
15 secondary outcomes
Combined Symptom and Medication Score (CSMS)
Time frame: over the entire grass pollen season estimated between 3 and 6 months after treatment
Symptom sub-scores (Eyes, Nose)
Time frame: over the peak period (14 consecutive days with highest pollen counts within grass pollen season) and over the pollen season estimated between 3 and 6 months after treatment
Well days: number of days with symptomatic score below or equal to 2 and no rescue medication
Time frame: over the peak period (14 consecutive days with highest pollen counts within grass pollen season) and over the pollen season estimated between 3 and 6 months after treatment
Lung Symptom Score (LLS: the average of coughing, wheezing, chest tightness and exercise induced dyspnoea scores) in asthmatic patients
Time frame: over the peak period (14 consecutive days with highest pollen counts within grass pollen season) and over the pollen season estimated between 3 and 6 months after treatment
Total Symptom Score (TSS: the sum of the nose, eye and lung scores) in asthmatic patients
Time frame: over the peak period (14 consecutive days with highest pollen counts within grass pollen season) and the pollen season estimated between 3 and 6 months after treatment
Use of rescue medication to relief asthma symptoms in asthmatic patients
Time frame: over the peak period (14 consecutive days with highest pollen counts within grass pollen season) and the pollen season estimated between 3 and 6 months after treatment
Conjunctival Provocation Test (CPT) outcomes
Time frame: at baseline and up to 6 weeks
Standardized Quality-of-Life Questionnaires for asthma and rhinoconjunctivitis
Time frame: between 2 weeks and 8 months after treatment
Number of working day lost due to grass pollen induced-allergy symptoms
Time frame: between 2 weeks and 8 months after treatment
Loss of productivity at work due to grass pollen induced-allergy symptoms, using a visual analog scale (VAS)
Time frame: between 2 weeks and 8 months after treatment
Solicited adverse events
Time frame: up to 4 weeks
Unsolicited adverse events and serious adverse events
Time frame: up to 8 months
Physical examinations and vital signs
Time frame: up to 8 months
Laboratory investigations (haematology, clinical biochemistry, immunological parameters)
Time frame: up to 8 months
Use of rescue medication
Time frame: up to 4 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Oct 2018.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30844425Sharif H, Singh I, Kouser L, Mosges R, Bonny MA, Karamani A, Parkin RV, Bovy N, Kishore U, Robb A, Katotomichelakis M, Holtappels G, Derycke L, Corazza F, von Frenckell R, Wathelet N, Duchateau J, Legon T, Pirotton S, Durham SR, Bachert C, Shamji MH. Immunologic mechanisms of a short-course of Lolium perenne peptide immunotherapy: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019 Sep;144(3):738-749. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.02.023. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
Related trials for Hay Fever
RecruitingPhase 1
Safety, Tolerability And Pharmacodynamics of DM-101PX in Birch Pollen Allergy
Birch Pollen Allergy
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of SHR-1819 Injection in Patients With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Identification of Allergen-reactive Antibodies in the Blood of Pollen Allergic Patients
Pollen Allergy
RecruitingObservational study
Investigating Nasal and Ocular Immune Response to Conjunctival Allergen Exposure
Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis
Recruiting
Evaluation of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of PL-14 Allergy Blocker Compared to Saline Spray in Patients With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR), Allergic Rhinitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ralph Mösges, Professor principal investigator
Private practice, Aachen, Germany
Claus Bachert, Professor principal investigator
UZ Gent, Gent, Belgium
Petr Panzner, MD principal investigator
University Hospital of Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic
3 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing gpASIT+TM in people with Hay Fever, run by BioTech Tools S.A. at 3 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Oct 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Belgium, Italy, Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Combined Symptom and Medication Score (CSMS) (time frame: over the peak (corresponding to 14 consecutive days with highest pollen counts) of grass pollen season estimated between 3 and 6 months after treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02560948, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Oct 2018.