Metastatic Pancreatic CancerNCT02555813
Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer With Abraxane
An observational study of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer, run by Celgene at 19 sites in Austria.
Trial summary
This observational program collects data on tolerability, safety and efficacy regarding the use of Abraxane in metastatic pancreatic cancer patients in the daily clinical routine. Additionally data on dosage that is actually used in these patients will be collected. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Abraxane and Gemcitabine
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- How many people
- 317 participants
- Where
- 19 sitesAustria
- Study dates
- 8 May 2015to 7 Sep 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Metastatic pancreatic cancer
Who may be able to join
- Metastatic pancreatic carcinoma
- Age > 18 years
- Signed Informed Consent
- Normal hepatic, renal and Bone Marrow functions
Who cannot join
- 1. Pregnant and lactating females 2. Previous treatment for metastatic pancreatic disease 3. Known hypersensitivity to nab-paclitaxel 4. Neutrophils < 1,5 x 10^9/L
- -
Trial locations and contacts
19 sites in 1 country.
19 sites in 1 country
Austria19 sites
BHB Eisenstadt
Eisenstadt, 7001
LKH Feldkirch
Feldkirch, 6800:
Medical University Graz
Graz, 8010
Medical University Innsbruck
Innsbruck, 6020:
KH Elisabethinen Klagenfurt
Klagenfurt, 9020
LKH Klagenfurt
Klagenfurt, 9020
KH Krems
Krems, 3500
LKH Leoben
Leoben, 8700:
KH Barmherzige Schwestern Linz
Linz, 4020:
LKH Salzburg
Salzburg, 5020:
LKH St. Pölten
Sankt Pölten, 3100:
LKH Steyr
Steyr, 4400:
Medical University Vienna
Vienna, 1090:
KH St. Josephs
Vienna, 1130
KH Hanusch
Vienna, 1140
LKH Vöcklabruck
Vöcklabruck, 4840:
Klinikum Wels
Wels, 4600:
LKH Wr. Neustadt
Wiener Neustadt, 2700:
KH Zams
Zams, 6511
About this study
Official title: Multicenter Non-interventional Study to Investigate Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Nab-paclitaxel in Clinical Routine Treatment of First-line Pancreatic Cancer Patients
This observational program collects data on tolerability, safety and efficacy regarding the use of Abraxane in metastatic pancreatic cancer patients in the daily clinical routine. Additionally data on dosage that is actually used in these patients will be collected. Patients who have pancreatic cancer and additional diseases can be documented in this study, too. Collected data might generate learnings on the optimal use of Abraxane in the daily routine setting.
Read the detailed description
This observational program is aimed at gaining tolerability, safety and efficacy data with the routine use of Abraxane in its labeled indication in metastatic pancreatic cancer. Additionally data on real life dosing in daily clinical routine will be analyzed.
A detailed record of the medical history including co-morbidities and pre-treatment regimens will allow analysis of the impact thereof on tolerability, dosage and efficacy.
Hands-on experience with nab-paclitaxel is very limited in Austria and an non-interventional study could enhance knowledge on optimal drug handling and Adverse Event management.
- Conditions
- Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
- Being tested
- Abraxane, Gemcitabine
- Keywords
- Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer, nab-Paclitaxel, Gemcitabine, Non-interventional
- Medical subject headings
- Pancreatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AbraxaneDrug
Also called Nab-paclitaxel, ABI-007
Abraxane By IV infusion on Days 1, 8, 15 and 28 until progression or toxicity
GemcitabineDrug
Also called Gemzar
Gemcitabine 1000mg IV infusion on Days 1, 8, 15 and 28 until disease progression or toxicity
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Abraxane + Gemcitabine | Abraxane 125mg by intravenous( IV) infusion + Gemcitabine 1000mg by intravenous on Days 1, 8, 15 of every 21 day cycle until progression Receives: Drug: Abraxane; Drug: Gemcitabine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of participants with adverse events
An AE is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen in a subject during the course of a study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the subject's health, including laboratory test values, regardless of etiology.
Measured: Up to 5 years
Secondary outcomes (1)
Best Overall Response
Tumor response will be summarized as the percentage of participants who achieve a confirmed complete (CR) or partial response (PR).
Measured: Up to 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Sep 2015 (estimated)
- Study start8 May 2015
- Primary completion7 Sep 2020
- Study completion7 Sep 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Metastatic Pancreatic CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by CelgeneThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 317 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Celgene
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Guenter Voraberger, MD, Study chair, Celgene Austria
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02555813
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ABI-007-PANC-006
- Status last verified
- Oct 2020
- First submitted
- 18 Sep 2015
- Last updated
- 19 Oct 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
McBride A, Bonafede M, Cai Q, Princic N, Tran O, Pelletier C, Parisi M, Patel M. Comparison of treatment patterns and economic outcomes among metastatic pancreatic cancer patients initiated on nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus FOLFIRINOX. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Oct;10(10):1153-1160. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2017.1365598. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
PubMed 28795609Kim S, Signorovitch JE, Yang H, Patterson-Lomba O, Xiang CQ, Ung B, Parisi M, Marshall JL. Comparative Effectiveness of nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine vs FOLFIRINOX in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Nationwide Chart Review in the United States. Adv Ther. 2018 Oct;35(10):1564-1577. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0784-z. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
PubMed 30209750Cartwright TH, Parisi M, Espirito JL, Wilson TW, Pelletier C, Patel M, Babiker HM. Clinical Outcomes with First-Line Chemotherapy in a Large Retrospective Study of Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Treated in a US Community Oncology Setting. Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2018 Sep;5(3):149-159. doi: 10.1007/s40801-018-0137-x.
PubMed 29946913Young R, Mainwaring P, Clingan P, Parnis FX, Asghari G, Beale P, Aly A, Botteman M, Romano A, Ferrara S, Margunato-Debay S, Harris M. nab-Paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Australian subset analyses of the phase III MPACT trial. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct;14(5):e325-e331. doi: 10.1111/ajco.12999. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
PubMed 29932294Fernandez A, Salgado M, Garcia A, Buxo E, Vera R, Adeva J, Jimenez-Fonseca P, Quintero G, Llorca C, Canabate M, Lopez LJ, Munoz A, Ramirez P, Gonzalez P, Lopez C, Reboredo M, Gallardo E, Sanchez-Canovas M, Gallego J, Guillen C, Ruiz-Miravet N, Navarro-Perez V, De la Camara J, Ales-Diaz I, Pazo-Cid RA, Carmona-Bayonas A. Prognostic factors for survival with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic cancer in real-life practice: the ANICE-PaC study. BMC Cancer. 2018 Nov 29;18(1):1185. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-5101-3.
PubMed 30497432Hegewisch-Becker S, Aldaoud A, Wolf T, Krammer-Steiner B, Linde H, Scheiner-Sparna R, Hamm D, Janicke M, Marschner N; TPK-Group (Tumour Registry Pancreatic Cancer). Results from the prospective German TPK clinical cohort study: Treatment algorithms and survival of 1,174 patients with locally advanced, inoperable, or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2019 Mar 1;144(5):981-990. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31751. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
PubMed 30006989Barnes JA, Ellis ML, Hwang S, Emarine J, Merwin P, Salinas GD, Musher BL. Identification of Educational Gaps Among Oncologists Who Manage Patients with Pancreatic Cancer. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2019 Mar;50(1):84-90. doi: 10.1007/s12029-017-0033-8.
PubMed 29177608Woo W, Carey ET, Choi M. Spotlight on liposomal irinotecan for metastatic pancreatic cancer: patient selection and perspectives. Onco Targets Ther. 2019 Feb 21;12:1455-1463. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S167590. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 30863113Sonbol MB, Ahn DH, Goldstein D, Okusaka T, Tabernero J, Macarulla T, Reni M, Li CP, O'Neil B, Van Cutsem E, Bekaii-Saab T. CanStem111P trial: a Phase III study of napabucasin plus nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine. Future Oncol. 2019 Apr;15(12):1295-1302. doi: 10.2217/fon-2018-0903. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
PubMed 30768369Prager GW, Oehler L, Gerger A, Mlineritsch B, Andel J, Petzer A, Wilthoner K, Sliwa T, Pichler P, Winder T, Heibl S, Gruenberger B, Laengle F, Hubmann E, Korger M, Pecherstorfer M, Djanani A, Neumann HJ, Philipp-Abbrederis K, Woll E, Trondl R, Arnold-Schrauf C, Eisterer W. Comparison of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in elderly versus younger patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: Analysis of a multicentre, prospective, non-interventional study. Eur J Cancer. 2021 Jan;143:101-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.11.003. Epub 2020 Dec 6.
PubMed 33296830
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Oct 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Multicenter Non-interventional Study to Investigate Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Nab-paclitaxel in Clinical Routine Treatment of First-line Pancreatic Cancer Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02555813
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ABI-007-PANC-006
- Conditions
- Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
- Keywords
- Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer, nab-Paclitaxel, Gemcitabine, Non-interventional
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 317 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- CelgeneIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 8 May 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 7 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 Sep 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Sep 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This observational program collects data on tolerability, safety and efficacy regarding the use of Abraxane in metastatic pancreatic cancer patients in the daily clinical routine. Additionally data on dosage that is actually used in these patients will be collected. Patients who have pancreatic cancer and additional diseases can be documented in this study, too. Collected data might generate learnings on the optimal use of Abraxane in the daily routine setting.
Detailed description
This observational program is aimed at gaining tolerability, safety and efficacy data with the routine use of Abraxane in its labeled indication in metastatic pancreatic cancer. Additionally data on real life dosing in daily clinical routine will be analyzed.
A detailed record of the medical history including co-morbidities and pre-treatment regimens will allow analysis of the impact thereof on tolerability, dosage and efficacy.
Hands-on experience with nab-paclitaxel is very limited in Austria and an non-interventional study could enhance knowledge on optimal drug handling and Adverse Event management.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Abraxane + Gemcitabine | – | Drug: Abraxane, Drug: GemcitabineAbraxane 125mg by intravenous( IV) infusion + Gemcitabine 1000mg by intravenous on Days 1, 8, 15 of every 21 day cycle until progression |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Metastatic pancreatic cancer
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Metastatic pancreatic carcinoma
- Age > 18 years
- Signed Informed Consent
- Normal hepatic, renal and Bone Marrow functions
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- 1. Pregnant and lactating females 2. Previous treatment for metastatic pancreatic disease 3. Known hypersensitivity to nab-paclitaxel 4. Neutrophils < 1,5 x 10^9/L
- -
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AbraxaneAlso: Nab-paclitaxel, ABI-007Abraxane By IV infusion on Days 1, 8, 15 and 28 until progression or toxicity | Drug | Abraxane + Gemcitabine |
| GemcitabineAlso: GemzarGemcitabine 1000mg IV infusion on Days 1, 8, 15 and 28 until disease progression or toxicity | Drug | Abraxane + Gemcitabine |
Primary outcome
Number of participants with adverse events
Time frame: Up to 5 years
An AE is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen in a subject during the course of a study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the subject's health, including laboratory test values, regardless of etiology.
1 secondary outcome
Best Overall Response
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Oct 2020.
- Background: PubMed 28795609McBride A, Bonafede M, Cai Q, Princic N, Tran O, Pelletier C, Parisi M, Patel M. Comparison of treatment patterns and economic outcomes among metastatic pancreatic cancer patients initiated on nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus FOLFIRINOX. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Oct;10(10):1153-1160. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2017.1365598. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
- Background: PubMed 30209750Kim S, Signorovitch JE, Yang H, Patterson-Lomba O, Xiang CQ, Ung B, Parisi M, Marshall JL. Comparative Effectiveness of nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine vs FOLFIRINOX in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Nationwide Chart Review in the United States. Adv Ther. 2018 Oct;35(10):1564-1577. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0784-z. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
- Background: PubMed 29946913Cartwright TH, Parisi M, Espirito JL, Wilson TW, Pelletier C, Patel M, Babiker HM. Clinical Outcomes with First-Line Chemotherapy in a Large Retrospective Study of Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Treated in a US Community Oncology Setting. Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2018 Sep;5(3):149-159. doi: 10.1007/s40801-018-0137-x.
- Background: PubMed 29932294Young R, Mainwaring P, Clingan P, Parnis FX, Asghari G, Beale P, Aly A, Botteman M, Romano A, Ferrara S, Margunato-Debay S, Harris M. nab-Paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Australian subset analyses of the phase III MPACT trial. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct;14(5):e325-e331. doi: 10.1111/ajco.12999. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
- Background: PubMed 30497432Fernandez A, Salgado M, Garcia A, Buxo E, Vera R, Adeva J, Jimenez-Fonseca P, Quintero G, Llorca C, Canabate M, Lopez LJ, Munoz A, Ramirez P, Gonzalez P, Lopez C, Reboredo M, Gallardo E, Sanchez-Canovas M, Gallego J, Guillen C, Ruiz-Miravet N, Navarro-Perez V, De la Camara J, Ales-Diaz I, Pazo-Cid RA, Carmona-Bayonas A. Prognostic factors for survival with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic cancer in real-life practice: the ANICE-PaC study. BMC Cancer. 2018 Nov 29;18(1):1185. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-5101-3.
- Background: PubMed 30006989Hegewisch-Becker S, Aldaoud A, Wolf T, Krammer-Steiner B, Linde H, Scheiner-Sparna R, Hamm D, Janicke M, Marschner N; TPK-Group (Tumour Registry Pancreatic Cancer). Results from the prospective German TPK clinical cohort study: Treatment algorithms and survival of 1,174 patients with locally advanced, inoperable, or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2019 Mar 1;144(5):981-990. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31751. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
- Background: PubMed 29177608Barnes JA, Ellis ML, Hwang S, Emarine J, Merwin P, Salinas GD, Musher BL. Identification of Educational Gaps Among Oncologists Who Manage Patients with Pancreatic Cancer. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2019 Mar;50(1):84-90. doi: 10.1007/s12029-017-0033-8.
- Background: PubMed 30863113Woo W, Carey ET, Choi M. Spotlight on liposomal irinotecan for metastatic pancreatic cancer: patient selection and perspectives. Onco Targets Ther. 2019 Feb 21;12:1455-1463. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S167590. eCollection 2019.
- Background: PubMed 30768369Sonbol MB, Ahn DH, Goldstein D, Okusaka T, Tabernero J, Macarulla T, Reni M, Li CP, O'Neil B, Van Cutsem E, Bekaii-Saab T. CanStem111P trial: a Phase III study of napabucasin plus nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine. Future Oncol. 2019 Apr;15(12):1295-1302. doi: 10.2217/fon-2018-0903. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33296830Prager GW, Oehler L, Gerger A, Mlineritsch B, Andel J, Petzer A, Wilthoner K, Sliwa T, Pichler P, Winder T, Heibl S, Gruenberger B, Laengle F, Hubmann E, Korger M, Pecherstorfer M, Djanani A, Neumann HJ, Philipp-Abbrederis K, Woll E, Trondl R, Arnold-Schrauf C, Eisterer W. Comparison of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in elderly versus younger patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: Analysis of a multicentre, prospective, non-interventional study. Eur J Cancer. 2021 Jan;143:101-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.11.003. Epub 2020 Dec 6.
Related trials for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
RecruitingPhase 1
Modified FOLFIRINOX and Pentamidine in Advanced and Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
RecruitingPhase 3
Atebimetinib + GnP as a First Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Pancreatic Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
RecruitingPhase 3
Study of Zoldonrasib + Chemo of Investigator's Choice vs Placebo + Chemo of Investigator's Choice as First-line Treatment in Metastatic KRAS G12D-mutated Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ( RASolute 305 )
Pancreatic Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
Recruiting
CREO - Microwave Ablation Feasibility Study
Pancreatic Cancer, Liver Cancer (Locally Advanced or Metastatic)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Guenter Voraberger, MD study chair
Celgene Austria
19 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer, run by Celgene at 19 sites in Austria.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 19 sites in Austria. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of participants with adverse events (time frame: Up to 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02555813, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Oct 2020.