AzTrials
AzTrials

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive (COPD)AdvantageNCT02551224

Preference on the Feedback Mechanisms of Dose Delivery Confirmation With the Breezhaler® Device Compared to the Ellipta® Device in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

A study testing Patient preference questionnaire in people with Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive (COPD), run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 10 sites in Argentina.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare in COPD patients naïve to DPIs, the perception of the Breezhaler® and Ellipta® devices' feedback mechanisms evaluated using a preference questionnaire. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 years and older
What is being tested?
Patient preference questionnaire
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
10 sitesArgentina
Study dates
Sep 2015to Mar 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with diagnosis of COPD (mild to very severe disease) based on post-bronchodilator FEV1 values in patients with FEV1/FVC <0.70.
  • No previous use of DPI.
  • Over and either be current smokers or have a history of smoking >10 years. (e.g., 10 pack years = 1 pack/day × 10 years, ½ pack/day × 20 years, etc.):
  • Note: A pack of cigarettes is equal to 20 cigarettes. Occasional smoking of cigars is not relevant to smoking history.
  • An ex-smoker is defined as a patient who has not smoked for ≥6 months at screening.
  • Willing and able to reproducibly perform spirometry and inhalational manoeuvers as required by the protocol.
  • Willing and able to comprehend and follow the instructions for use of the inhalational devices to be tested in the study.
  • Questions or requests for clarification regarding the eligibility of a particular patient based on the above inclusion criteria should be directed to the medical monitor before the patient is enrolled.

Who cannot join

  • History of hypersensitivity to the components of the placebo used in the study or to compounds of similar chemical classes. This includes (but is not exhaustive) patients with known lactose allergy, allergy to magnesium stearate, and those who have suffered paradoxical bronchospasm on inhalation of placebo medications.
  • Patients who received treatment with systemic corticosteroids, antibiotics, or had a history suggestive of acute COPD exacerbation and/or hospitalization within 12 weeks prior to the screening or during the baseline period.
  • Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women, defined as the state of a female after conception and until the termination of gestation, confirmed by a positive urine pregnancy test.
  • Women of child-bearing potential, defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant, UNLESS:
  • Women with reliable contraception methods.
  • Post-menopausal women with no possibility of becoming pregnant.
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Note: Women are considered post-menopausal and not of child-bearing potential if they have had 12 months of natural (spontaneous) amenorrhea with an appropriate clinical profile (e.g. age appropriate, history of vasomotor symptoms) or six months of spontaneous amenorrhea with serum FSH levels > 40 mIU/mL or have had surgical bilateral oophorectomy (with or without hysterectomy) or tubal ligation at least six weeks prior to baseline. In the case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment is she considered not of child bearing potential.
  • Patients with a history (at Visit 1) of asthma indicated by (but not limited to):
  • Onset of respiratory symptoms suggestive of asthma (such as cough, wheezing, shortness of breath) prior to age 40.
  • History of a diagnosis of asthma.
  • Patients with allergic rhinitis who use an H1 antagonist or intra-nasal corticosteroids intermittently (Treatment with a stable dose or regimen is permitted).
  • History of clinically significant conditions including: significant cardiovascular disease, uncontrolled diabetes, a history of non-compliance, alcohol or drug abuse, any patient with active cancer, or any condition in the opinion of the investigator that makes the patient unsuitable for participation in this study.
  • Use of investigational drugs (approved or unapproved) in the 3 months before screening.
  • Within the 7 days prior to the visits, an increase in episodic use of rescue bronchodilator more than double the average number of puffs used in the preceding week or more than 8 puffs of SABA on any 3 consecutive days or more than 12 puffs of SABA on any 2 consecutive days.
  • Respiratory tract infections (sinus, middle ear, oropharyngeal, upper or lower respiratory tract infection) within the 4weeks before the visit.

Trial locations and contacts

10 sites in 1 country.

10 sites in 1 country

Argentina10 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Buenos Aires, B1842DID

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Buenos Aires, C1120AAC

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Buenos Aires, C1425AUA

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    CABA, Buenos Aires, C1426ABP

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    CABA

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Ciudad Autonoma de Bs As, C1425FVH

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Florida, Buenos Aires, B1602DQD

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    La Plata, Buenos Aires, 1900

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, 7600

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Vicente López, Buenos Aires, B1602DOH

Other trials in Argentina

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Open-label, Cross-over Study Comparing the Preference on the Feedback Mechanisms of Dose Delivery Confirmation With the Breezhaler® Device Compared to the Ellipta® Device in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): The Advantage Study

The purpose of this study is to compare in COPD patients naïve to DPIs, the perception of the Breezhaler® and Ellipta® devices' feedback mechanisms evaluated using a preference questionnaire.

Being tested
Patient preference questionnaire
Keywords
COPD
Medical subject headings
Lung Diseases, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Patient preference questionnaireOther

    The primary variable will be the mean score of questions 1(a) to 1(c) from the preference questionnaire completed at the end of study.

Study groups in NCT02551224
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Breezhaler, then ElliptaExperimentalHalf of the patients will be assigned to first receive a single dose of placebo via the Breezhaler® followed by a single dose of placebo via the Ellipta® inhalation device. The evaluation questionnaires after using each device.
Receives: Other: Patient preference questionnaire
Ellipta, then BreezhalerExperimentalHalf of the patients will be assigned to first receive a single dose of placebo via the Ellipta® followed by a single dose of placebo via the Breezhaler® inhalation device. The evaluation questionnaires after using each device.
Receives: Other: Patient preference questionnaire

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient's Preference on the Feedback Mechanisms of Dose Delivery Confirmation Using the Breezhaler® and Ellipta® Devices

    This study will measure patient's perceptions of dose delivery, using a preference questionnaire on use of the Breezhaler® \& Ellipta® devices, in COPD patients naïve to DPI devices.The mean (SD) score on a scale of 1- 5 (1 = not at all confident/not at all; 5 = extremely confident/a very great deal) 1a. How confident were you that you received the full dose of medication from your inhaler?

    1=Not At All Confident, 2=Not Very Confident, 3=Somewhat Confident, 4=Confident, 5=Extremely Confident

    1b. How certain were you that there was no drug remaining in the device?

    1=Not At All Certain,2=Not Very Certain, 3=Somewhat Certain,4=Certain, 5=Extremely Certain

    1c. To what extent did the device help you to know that you have received all the medication?

    1=Not At All, 2=A Little, 3=Somewhat, 4=Very Much, 5=A Very Great Deal

    Measured: 6 hours

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Comfort of the Mouth Pieces for Performing a Tight Seal With the Lips.

    To measure in COPD patients naïve to DPIs, the comfort of the mouth pieces when performing a tight seal with the lips using the Breezhaler® and Ellipta® devices.The mean (SD) score on a scale of 1 - 5 (1 = not at all easy, 2= not very easy, 3=somewhat easy, 4=very easy, 5 = extremely easy)

    Measured: 6 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Sep 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2015
  3. Primary completionMar 2016
  4. Study completionMar 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Model description
open-label, cross-over study comparing the preference on the feedback mechanisms of dose delivery confirmation with the Breezhaler® device compared to the Ellipta® device
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02551224
Sponsor's protocol ID
CQVA149A2405
Acronym
Advantage
Status last verified
Nov 2017
First submitted
31 Aug 2015
Last updated
18 Dec 2017
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Altman P, Bergna MA, Garcia GR, Guerin T, Pino AV, Whiteford JL. Patient perception of Breezhaler(R) and Ellipta(R) device feedback mechanisms in COPD: The ADVANTAGE Study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Feb;35(2):221-227. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1464437. Epub 2018 May 15.

    PubMed 29649916

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Patient preference questionnaire in people with Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive (COPD), run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 10 sites in Argentina.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Dec 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 10 sites in Argentina. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Oct 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patient's Preference on the Feedback Mechanisms of Dose Delivery Confirmation Using the Breezhaler® and Ellipta® Devices (time frame: 6 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02551224, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Dec 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in