AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating PolyradiculoneuropathyPhase 3NCT02549170

A Study of HyQvia and Gammagard Liquid (Kiovig) in Adults With Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP)

A Phase 3 study testing HYQVIA, IGIV GAMMAGARD LIQUID/KIOVIG and IGIV GAMUNEX®-C in people with Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy, run by Baxalta now part of Shire at 83 sites in 22 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to learn more about the following treatment options in adults with CIDP: Subcutaneous self-infusion with HyQvia. Intravenous infusion with Gammagard/Kiovig. Gammagard and Kiovig are the brand names for the same immunoglobulin compound. The study is in two parts. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
HYQVIA, IGIV GAMMAGARD LIQUID/KIOVIG and IGIV GAMUNEX®-C
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
138 participants
Where
83 sitesin 22 countries
Study dates
15 Dec 2015to 23 Feb 2022
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Males or females of age greater than or equal to (>=)18 years old at the time of screening.
  • Participant has a documented diagnosis of definite or probable Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) (focal atypical CIDP and pure sensory atypical CIDP will be excluded), as confirmed by a neurologist specializing/experienced in neuromuscular diseases to be consistent with the European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) 2010 criteria (European Federation of Neurological Societies, 2010). Fulfillment of electrodiagnostic criteria must be confirmed by an independent qualified/experienced central reader.
  • Participant has responded to IgG treatment in the past (partial or complete resolution of neurological symptoms and deficits), and must currently be on stable doses of IGIV treatment within the dose range equivalent to a cumulative monthly dose of 0.4 to 2.4 gram per kilogram (g/kg) BW (inclusive) administered intravenously for at least 12 weeks prior to screening. The dosing interval of IGIV treatment must be between 2 and 6 weeks (inclusive). Variations in the dosing interval of up to ± 7 days or monthly dose amount of up to ± 20% between participant's pre-study Immunoglobulin G (IgG) infusions are within acceptable limits.
  • INCAT disability score between 0 and 7 (inclusive). Participants with INCAT scores of 0, 1 (whether from upper or lower extremities), or 2 (if at least 1 point is from an upper extremity) at screening and/or baseline will be required to have a history of significant disability as defined by an INCAT disability score of 2 (must be exclusively from the lower extremities) or greater documented in the medical record. Participants will be eligible if one of the below eligibility criteria are met:
  • Screening and Baseline INCAT disability score of between 3 and 7 inclusive.
  • Screening and/or Baseline INCAT disability score of 2 (both points are from lower extremities).
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Screening and/or Baseline INCAT disability score of 2 (both points are not from lower extremities) AND has at least a score of 2 or greater documented in the medical record prior to screening. If a score was greater than 2 documented in the medical record prior to screening at least 2 points must be from lower extremities.
  • Screening and/or Baseline INCAT disability score of 0 or 1 AND has at least a score of 2 or greater (both from lower extremities) documented in the medical record prior to screening, at least 2 points must be from lower extremities.
  • If female of childbearing potential, the participant must have a negative pregnancy test at screening and agree to employ a highly effective contraceptive measure throughout the course of the study and for at least 30 days after the last administration of investigational product (IP).
  • Participant is willing and able to sign an Informed Consent Form (ICF).
  • Participant is willing and able to comply with the requirements of the protocol.

Who cannot join

  • Participants with Focal atypical CIDP or pure sensory atypical CIDP.
  • Any neuropathy of other causes, including:
  • Hereditary demyelinating neuropathies, such as hereditary sensory and motor neuropathy (HSMN) (Charcot-Marie-Tooth [CMT] disease), and hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathies (HSANs).
  • Neuropathies secondary to infections, disorders, or systemic diseases such as Borrelia burgdorferi infection (Lyme disease), diphtheria, systemic lupus erythematosus, POEMS (polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, M-protein, and skin changes) syndrome, osteosclerotic myeloma, diabetic and non-diabetic lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy, lymphoma, and amyloidosis.
  • Multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy (MADSAM).
  • Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN).
Show all 34Show fewer
  • Drug-, biologic-, chemotherapy-, or toxin-induced peripheral neuropathy.
  • Immunoglobulin M (IgM) paraproteinemia, including IgM monoclonal gammopathy with high titer antibodies to myelin-associated glycoprotein.
  • Prominent sphincter disturbance.
  • Central demyelinating disorders (eg, multiple sclerosis).
  • Any chronic or debilitating disease, or central nervous disorder that causes neurological symptoms or may interfere with assessment of CIDP or outcome measures (eg, arthritis, stroke, Parkinson's disease, and diabetic peripheral neuropathy) (Participants with clinically diagnosed diabetes mellitus who do not have diabetic peripheral neuropathy, who have adequate glycemic control with Hemoglobin A1C; also known as glycosylated or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) of less than (<) 7.5% at screening, and who agree to maintain adequate glycemic control during the study are allowed).
  • Congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] Class III/IV), unstable angina, unstable cardiac arrhythmias, or uncontrolled hypertension (ie, diastolic blood pressure greater than (>) 100 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) and/or systolic blood pressure >160 mmHg).
  • History of deep vein thrombosis or thromboembolic events (eg, cerebrovascular accident, pulmonary embolism) in the past 12 months.
  • Condition(s) which could alter protein catabolism and/or IgG utilization (eg, protein-losing enteropathies, nephrotic syndrome).
  • Known history of chronic kidney disease, or glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of <60 milliliter per minute per 1.73 square meter (mL/min/1.73m^2) estimated based on CKD-EPI equation (Levey et al., 2009) at the time of screening.
  • Participant with active malignancy requiring chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, or history of malignancy with less than 2 years of complete remission prior to screening. Exceptions are: adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, carcinoma in situ of the cervix, and stable prostate cancer not requiring treatment.
  • Clinically significant anemia or hemoglobin (Hgb) level of less than (<) 10.0 grams per deciliter (g/dL) at screening.
  • Hypersensitivity or adverse reactions (AR's) (eg, urticaria, breathing difficulty, severe hypotension, or anaphylaxis) to human blood products such as human IgG, albumin, or other blood components.
  • Known allergy to hyaluronidase of human (including recombinant human hyaluronidase) or animal origin (such as bee or wasp venom).
  • Known history of or immunoglobulin A (IgA) deficiency (<8 milligram per deciliter [mg/dL]) at screening.
  • Abnormal laboratory values at screening:
  • Serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 2.5* upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • Platelet count <100,000 cells per microliter (cells/mcL).
  • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <1000 cells/mcL.
  • Ongoing/active infection with hepatitis A virus (HAV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) Type 1/2 infection.
  • The participant has received or is currently receiving treatment with immunomodulatory/ immunosuppressive agents within 6 months prior to screening.
  • Participant has received or is currently receiving treatment with corticosteroids dose within 8 weeks prior to screening, regardless of indication.
  • Participant has undergone plasma exchange (PE) within 3 months prior to screening.
  • The participant has any disorder or condition that in the investigator's judgment may impede the participant's participation in the study, pose increased risk to the participant, or confound the results of the study.
  • The participant is nursing or intends to begin nursing during the course of the study.
  • Participant has participated in another clinical study involving an IP or investigational device within 30 days prior to enrollment, or is scheduled to participate in another clinical study (with the exception of the HYQVIA/HyQvia extension study in CIDP) involving an IP or investigational device during the course of this study.
  • The participant is a family member or employee of the investigator.
  • Participants with acquired or inherited thrombophilic disorders. These will include the specific types of acquired or inherited thrombophilic disorders that could put participants at risk of develop thrombotic events. Examples include:
  • Hereditary Thrombophilias i. Factor V Leiden mutation. ii. Prothrombin 20210A mutation. iii. Protein C deficiency. iv. Protein S deficiency. v. Antithrombin deficiency. b. Acquired thrombophilias i. Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. ii. Activated protein C Resistance acquired. iii. Homocystinemia.

Trial locations and contacts

83 sites in 22 countries.

83 sites in 22 countries

United States19 sites
  • Regents of the University of colorado

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

  • Austin Neuromuscular Center

    Austin, Texas, 78756

  • Immunoe Research Centers

    Centennial, Colorado, 80112

  • University of Cincinnati

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267-0525

  • Cleveland Clinic

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195

  • The Methodist Hospital Research Institute

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • University Texas Physicians CAR

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • University of Kansas Medical Center Research Institute, Inc.

    Kansas City, Kansas, 66160

  • Neurology Center of Las Vegas

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89128

  • Hospital for Special Surgery

    New York, New York, 10032

  • Rutgers New Jersey Medical School

    Newark, New Jersey, 07103

  • University of California-Irvine

    Orange, California, 92868

  • Barrow Neurological Institute

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85013

  • Arizona Neuromuscular Research Center

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85028

  • William Beaumont Hospital

    Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073-6769

  • Forbes Norris Mda/als Ctr

    San Francisco, California, 94109

  • HonorHealth Neurology

    Scottsdale, Arizona, 85251

  • University of South Florida

    Tampa, Florida, 33612

  • Wake Forest University

    Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157

Other trials in United States

Italy11 sites
  • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria San Martino

    Genova, 16132

  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico G. Martino

    Messina, 98122

  • Casa di Cura del Policlinico

    Milan, 20144

  • Fondazione Istituto Neurologico Casimiro Mondino

    Pavia, 27100

  • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana

    Pisa, 56126

  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico Umberto I - Università di Roma La Sapienza

    Roma, 00161

  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico Tor Vergata

    Rome, Roma, 00133

  • Istituto Clinico Humanitas

    Rozzano, Milano, 20089

  • IRCCS Ospedale Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza

    San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, 71013

  • Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino

    Torino, 10126

  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Santa Maria della Misericordia

    Udine, 33100

Other trials in Italy

Brazil5 sites
  • Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da UNICAMP

    Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-887

  • Instituto de Neurologia de Curitiba - Hospital Ecoville

    Curitiba, Paraná, 81210-310

  • HUAP - UFF - Hospital Universitario Antonio Pedro - Universidade Federal Fluminense

    Niterói, Rio Do Janeiro, 24033-900

  • Hospital das Clínicas FMRP-USP

    Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14048-900

  • Hospital Sao Paulo

    São Paulo, São Paulo, 04039-032

Other trials in Brazil

Turkey (Türkiye)5 sites
  • Pamukkale Uni. Med. Fac.

    Denizli, 20070

  • Istanbul University Cerrahpasa - Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty

    Istanbul, 34098

  • Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine

    Izmir, 35340

  • Selcuk Universitesi Selcuklu Tip Fakultesi Hastanesi

    Konya, 42075

  • Celal Bayar University Medical Faculty

    Manisa, 45040

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

Argentina4 sites
  • Hospital Italiano

    Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1181ACH

  • Hospital Britanico de Buenos Aires

    Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, 1280

  • Complejo Medico de la Policia Federal Argentina Churruca Visca

    Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, 1416

  • Instituto de Investigaciones Neurologicas Raul Carrea, FLENI

    Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, C1428AQK

Other trials in Argentina

France4 sites
  • Groupe Hospitalier Pellegrin - Hôpital Pellegrin

    Bordeaux, Gironde, 33076

  • Hopital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer

    Bron, Rhone, 69677

  • Hôpital de la Timone

    Marseille, Bouches-du-Rhône, 13385

  • CHU de Nice Hôpital Pasteur 2

    Nice, Alpes Maritimes, 06001

Other trials in France

Poland4 sites
  • COPERNICUS Podmiot Leczniczy Sp. z o. o.,

    Gdansk, 80-803

  • Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne

    Gdansk, 80-952

  • Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny nr 1 im. Norberta Barlickiego

    Lodz, 90-153

  • Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny Nr 4 w Lublinie

    Lublin, 20-090

Other trials in Poland

Spain4 sites
  • Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

    Barcelona, 08025

  • Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron

    Barcelona, 08035

  • Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge

    L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08907

  • Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio

    Seville, 41013

Other trials in Spain

Canada3 sites
  • University of Alberta Hospital

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7

  • LHSC - University Hospital

    London, Ontario, N6A 5A5

  • Toronto General Hospital

    Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4

Other trials in Canada

Croatia3 sites
  • Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka

    Rijeka, 51000

  • Clinical Hospital Centar Zagreb

    Zagreb, 10000

  • University Hospital Centre "Sestre Milosrdnice"

    Zagreb, 10000

Other trials in Croatia

Czechia3 sites
  • Fakultni nemocnice Brno

    Brno, 625 00

  • Fakultni nemocnice Ostrava

    Ostrava - Poruba, 708 52

  • Fakultni nemocnice v Motole

    Prague, 150 06

Other trials in Czechia

Germany3 sites
  • Universitaetsklinikum Essen

    Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 45147

  • Universitaetsmedizin Goettingen

    Göttingen, Lower Saxony, 37075

  • Universitaetsklinikum Leipzig AoeR

    Leipzig, Saxony, 04103

Other trials in Germany

Serbia3 sites
  • Clinical Center of Serbia

    Belgrade, 11000

  • Military Medical Academy

    Belgrade, 11000

  • Clinical Center Nis

    Niš, 18000

Other trials in Serbia

United Kingdom3 sites
  • Southmead Hospital

    Bristol, Avon, BS10 5NB

  • The Walton Centre

    Liverpool, Merseyside, L9 7LJ

  • King's College Hospital

    London, Greater London, SE5 9RS

Other trials in United Kingdom

Slovakia2 sites
  • Univerzitna nemocnica Bratislava Nemocnica ak. L. Derera, II. Neurologicka klinika

    Bratislava, 83101

  • Fakultna nemocnica Nitra

    Nitra, 95001

Other trials in Slovakia

Colombia1 site
  • Institucion Prestadora de Servicios de Salud de la Universidad de Antioquia "IPS UNIVERSITARIA"

    Medellín, 00000

Other trials in Colombia

Denmark1 site
  • Århus Universitetshospital

    Aarhus, 8000

Other trials in Denmark

Greece1 site
  • University Hospital of Patra

    Pátrai, 26504

Other trials in Greece

Israel1 site
  • Chaim Sheba Medical Center

    Ramat Gan, 5265601

Other trials in Israel

Mexico1 site
  • Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutricion Dr. Salvador Zubiran

    Mexico City, Mexico City, 14080

Other trials in Mexico

Norway1 site
  • Oslo Universitetssykehus HF, Ullevål

    Oslo, 0407

Other trials in Norway

Sweden1 site
  • Hallands sjukhus

    Halmstad, 302 33

Other trials in Sweden

About this study

Official title: A Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Immune Globulin Infusion 10% (Human) With Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase (HYQVIA/HyQvia) and Immune Globulin Infusion (Human), 10% (GAMMAGARD LIQUID/KIOVIG) for the Treatment of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP)

The aim of this study is to learn more about the following treatment options in adults with CIDP:

  • Subcutaneous self-infusion with HyQvia.
  • Intravenous infusion with Gammagard/Kiovig. Gammagard and Kiovig are the brand names for the same immunoglobulin compound.
Read more

The study is in two parts. In Part 1, participants receive either HyQvia or a placebo subcutaneously. In Part 2 (only for participants who have a CIPD relapse during Part 1), participants will receive Gammagard Liquid/Kiovig intravenously. US participants will receive Gamunex-C.

The first SC infusion will be given in the study clinic. The remaining SC infusions may be given in the study clinic or the participant's home. This will be decided by the study doctor and whether the participant or their caregiver can do the self-infusion.

Being tested
HYQVIA, 0.25% albumin placebo solution with rHuPH20, IGIV GAMMAGARD LIQUID/KIOVIG, IGIV GAMUNEX®-C
Keywords
Autoimmune Diseases, Polyneuropathies, Nervous System Diseases, Peripheral Nervous System Diseases, Polyradiculoneuropathy, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System, Immunoglobulins, Immune System Diseases, Demyelinating Diseases, Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating, Neuromuscular Diseases
Medical subject headings
Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating, Autoimmune Diseases, Polyneuropathies, Nervous System Diseases, Peripheral Nervous System Diseases, Polyradiculoneuropathy, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System, Immune System Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • HYQVIABiological

    Also called 10%) with recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20), Immune Globulin Infusion 10% (Human) (IGI, IGI, 10% with rHuPH20

    Participants will receive HYQVIA/HyQvia SC which contains both Immune Globulin Infusion 10% (Human) (IGI, 10%) and recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20).

  • 0.25% albumin placebo solution with rHuPH20Biological

    Participants will receive placebo solution (0.25% human albumin in Lactated Ringer's solution) and rHuPH20.

  • IGIV GAMMAGARD LIQUID/KIOVIGBiological

    Also called Immune Globulin Infusion (Human), Intravenous immunoglobulin G, 10% (GAMMAGARD LIQUID/KIOVIG), GAMMAGARD LIQUID

    Participants will receive GAMMAGARD LIQUID/KIOVIG

  • IGIV GAMUNEX®-CBiological

    Also called Immune Globulin Infusion (Human), Intravenous immunoglobulin G, Approved IGIV product for US sites

    Participants will receive GAMUNEX®-C

Study groups in NCT02549170
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQviaExperimentalParticipants received HYQVIA/HyQvia (rHuPH20) 80 U/g IG, following by SC injection of immunoglobulin (IGI) 10% at the same monthly equivalent IG dose as the individual participant's pre-randomized IG dose when administered every 2, 3, or 4 weeks for 30.28 weeks or until relapse.
Receives: Biological: HYQVIA
Epoch 1: Placebo with rHuPH20Placebo comparatorParticipants received rHuPH20 80 U/I0 mL placebo solution, followed by SC placebo infusion at matching infusion volume as the participant's pre-randomization monthly equivalent IG dose when administered every 2, 3, or 4 weeks for 31.54 weeks or until relapse.
Receives: Biological: 0.25% albumin placebo solution with rHuPH20
Epoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGExperimentalParticipants who were enrolled to receive placebo with rHuPH20 and achieved chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) relapse during Epoch 1 received the induction dose of GGL/KIOVIG 2 g/kg bi-weekly (BW), followed by IV infusion at the same monthly equivalent dose as the participant's pre-randomization IGIV dosing regimen when administered every 3 weeks for 25.63 weeks or until relapse.
Receives: Biological: IGIV GAMMAGARD LIQUID/KIOVIG
Epoch 2: E1: HYQVIA Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGExperimentalParticipants who were enrolled to receive HYQVIA/HyQvia (rHuPH20) and achieved CIDP relapse during Epoch 1 received the induction dose of GGL/KIOVIG 2 g/kg BW, followed by IV infusion at the same monthly equivalent dose as the participant's pre-randomization IGIV dosing regimen when administered every 3 weeks for 28.67 weeks or until relapse.
Receives: Biological: IGIV GAMMAGARD LIQUID/KIOVIG
Epoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GAMMUNEX-CExperimentalParticipants who were enrolled to receive placebo with rHuPH20 and achieved CIDP relapse during Epoch 1 received the induction dose of GAMMUNEX-C 2 g/kg BW, followed by IV infusion at the same monthly equivalent dose as the participant's pre-randomization IGIV dosing regimen when administered every 3 weeks for 24.33 weeks or until relapse.
Receives: Biological: IGIV GAMUNEX®-C

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Epoch 1: Relapse Rate

    Relapse rate is defined as the percentage of participants who experience a worsening of functional disability. Worsening of functional disability defined as an increase of >=1 point relative to the pre- subcutaneous (SC) treatment baseline score in 2 consecutive adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability score. The INCAT disability score is an effective and responsive tool to assess clinical response to treatment in CIDP. The disability score ranges from 0 to 10 points, where 0 is normal (eg, no upper limb problems and walking not affected) and 10 is severely incapacitated (eg, inability to move either arm for any purposeful movement and restricted to wheelchair, unable to stand and walk a few steps with help).

    Measured: Week 32 End of Epoch 1 Treatment (EOET1)/Unscheduled relapse visit assessment (UV)/Early Termination (ET)

  2. Epoch 2: Responder Rate

    Responder rate is defined as clinically meaningful improvement in functional ability defined as a decrease of >=1 point in the adjusted INCAT disability score at the completion of the intravenous (IV) treatment period [6 months] or at the last study visit of the IV treatment period, relative to the pre-IV treatment baseline score.

    Measured: Up to 6 Months post-Epoch 1 (End of Epoch 2 Treatment [EOE2T])/Unscheduled visit assessment (UV)/Early Termination

Secondary outcomes (43)
  1. Epoch 1: Percentage of Participants Who Experience a Worsening of Functional Disability

    Defined as one or more of the following: an increase of >=1 point relative to the pre-subcutaneous (SC) treatment baseline score in 2 consecutive adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment disability scale (INCAT) scores; who experience CIDP worsening (defined as a >=8 kilo Pascal (kPa) decrease in the hand grip strength in the more affected hand); >=4 points decrease in raw Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS) relative to the pre-SC treatment baseline score (at the time of withdrawal from the SC treatment period). Participants are rounded off to nearest single decimal point.

    Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  2. Time to Relapse

    Time to relapse is defined as time from the date of the first SC administration of HYQVIA/HyQvia or placebo with rHuPH20 to the date of relapse. Participants who did not relapse were censored at their end of study.

    Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  3. Epoch 1: Change From Pre-Subcutaneous (SC) Treatment Baseline in Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS)

    The Rasch-Built Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS) is a participant self-reported, linearly-weighted overall disability scale that was specifically designed to capture activity and social participation limitations in participant with immune-mediated peripheral neuropathies including CIDP. The R-ODS is comprised of 24 items for which participants are asked to rate their functioning (i.e, no difficulty, some difficulty, or could not do) related to a variety of everyday tasks at the moment of completion. The centile metric R-ODS score range is 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better condition. The centile metric R-ODS score was used in the ANCOVA analysis. ANCOVA was used for the analysis.

    Measured: Pre-subcutaneous (SC) treatment baseline, end of Epoch 1 treatment (approximately 7.3 months)

  4. Epoch 1: Number of Participants Experiencing Any Treatment-Emergent Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs), Regardless of Causality

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an Investigational Product (IP) that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. A SAE is defined as an untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets one or more of the following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or results in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a medically important event, thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia. A nonserious AE is an AE that does not meet the criteria.

    Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  5. Epoch 1: Number of Participants Experiencing Causally Related Serious and/or Non-Serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs)

    AE=any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered IP. AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (e.g.,abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (e.g.,rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (e.g.,peritonitis,bacteremia,etc.), outcome of death temporally associated with use of IP,considered causally related to the IP. SAE=untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization/results in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is congenital anomaly/birth defect, is medically important event, thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia. Non-SAE=AE not meeting this criteria. AE recorded by investigator as possibly/probably related to IP is considered related AE, any AE recorded as unlikely/not related is considered unrelated AE.

    Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  6. Epoch 1: Number of Participants With Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs

    An AR plus suspected AR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. A SAE is defined as an untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets one or more of the following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or results in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a medically important event, thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia. A nonserious AE is an AE that does not meet the criteria.

    Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  7. Epoch 1: Number of Treatment-emergent Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs) Associated With Infusions Regardless of Causality

    AE: any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. SAE: an untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets one or more of the following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or results in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a medically important event, thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia. A nonserious AE is an AE that does not meet the criteria. Participants can have more than one adverse event.

    Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  8. Epoch 1: Number of Causally Related Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs) Associated With Infusions

    AE: any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered IP. AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (e.g., abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (e.g., rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (e.g., peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), outcome of death temporally associated with use of IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. SAE: untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization/results in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is congenital anomaly/birth defect, is medically important event, (e.g., thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia). Non-SAE:AE not meeting this criteria. AE recorded by investigator as possibly/probably related to IP is considered related AE, any AE recorded as unlikely/not related is considered unrelated AE.

    Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  9. Epoch 1: Number of Adverse Events (AEs) Temporally Associated With Infusions

    AEs occurring during an infusion or within 72 hours after completion of an infusion. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an Investigational Product (IP) that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. Participants can have more than one temporally associated with infusion adverse event.

    Measured: During an infusion or within 72 hours after completion of an infusion (up to Week 32)

  10. Epoch 1: Number of Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs Associated With Infusions

    AR plus suspected AR: any AE that meets any of the criteria: AE considered by either investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. SAE: untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets one or more of following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or results in prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a medically important event, thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia. Nonserious AE is AE that does not meet the criteria. Infusion per event = number of events / total number of infusions administered (started) to participants in analysis set. Participants can have more than one AR/suspected AR associated with infusion.

    Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  11. Epoch 1: Number of Treatment-emergent Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) Associated With Infusions

    A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as any event not present prior to the initiation of the treatments or any event already present that worsens in either intensity or frequency following exposure to the treatments. Participants can have more than one TEAE associated with infusion.

    Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  12. Epoch 1: Number of Treatment-emergent Local Infusion Site Reactions Associated With Infusions

    AE=any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not have causal relationship with treatment. AE can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (e.g., abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (e.g., rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (e.g., peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. Adverse reaction/suspected adverse reaction=AE that is considered by the investigator to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or for which the causality is indeterminate or missing, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 hours following the end of IP infusion. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are defined as adverse events that occurred during or after administration of the first dose of IP. Infusion site adverse events and injection site adverse events refer to the same type of adverse events.

    Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  13. Epoch 1: Number of Infusions in Participants for Which the Infusion Rate Was Reduced And/Or the Infusion Was Interrupted or Stopped Due to Intolerability And/Or Adverse Events (AEs)

    Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  14. Epoch 1: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per Infusion

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. Data for number of events per infusion is assessed at the group level as follows: Per infusion = number of events / total number of infusions administered (started) to participants in the analysis set.

    Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  15. Epoch 1: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. Data is reported for number of events per participant which is assessed at the group level as follows: AE per participant = number of AEs/ total number of participants in the safety analysis set.

    Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  16. Epoch 1: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per 1000 Participant-year

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. Data for number of events per 1000 participant-years is assessed as follows: Per 1000 participant-years = 1000 x (number of events / total number of days of exposure, i.e., the sum of duration of treatment for all participants in the safety analysis set, divided by 365.25)

    Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  17. Epoch 1: Rates of Causally Related Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Expressed As Number of Events Per Infusion

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. An AE that is recorded by the investigator as possibly related or probably related to IP was considered a related AE, and any AE recorded as unlikely related or not related was considered unrelated AE. Data for number of events per infusion is assessed at the group level as follows: Per infusion = number of events / total number of infusions administered (started) to participants in the analysis set.

    Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  18. Epoch 1: Rates of Causally Related Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Expressed As Number of Events Per Participant

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. An AE that is recorded by the investigator as possibly related or probably related to IP was considered a related AE, and any AE recorded as unlikely related or not related was considered unrelated AE. Data is reported for number of events per participant which is assessed at the group level as follows: AE per participant = number of AEs/ total number of participants in the safety analysis set.

    Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  19. Epoch 1: Rates of Causally Related Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant-year

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. An AE that is recorded by the investigator as possibly related or probably related to IP was considered a related AE, and any AE recorded as unlikely related or not related was considered unrelated AE.

    Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  20. Epoch 1: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs, Expressed as Number of Events Per Infusion

    An AR plus suspected AR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. Data for number of events per infusion is assessed at the group level as follows: Per infusion = number of events / total number of infusions administered (started) to participants in the analysis set.

    Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  21. Epoch 1: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs, Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant

    An AR plus suspected AR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. Data is reported for number of events per participant which is assessed at the group level as follows: AE per participant = number of AEs/ total number of participants in the safety analysis set.

    Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  22. Epoch 1: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs, Expressed as Number of Events Per 1000 Participant-Year

    An AR plus suspected AR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. Data for number of events per 1000 participant-years is assessed as follows: Per 1000 participant-years = 1000 x (number of events / total number of days of exposure, i.e., the sum of duration of treatment for all participants in the safety analysis set, divided by 365.25)

    Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  23. Epoch 1: Number of Participants Who Develop Binding and/or Neutralizing Antibodies to Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase (rHuPH20)

    Number of participants who developed binding and/or neutralizing antibodies to rHuPH20 in Epoch 1 were reported. High-binding antibodies is defined as number of participants who had at least one anti-rHuPH20 antibody titer ≥1:160 during treatment.

    Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET

  24. Epoch 2: Number of Participants Experiencing Any Treatment-emergent Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs), Regardless of Causality

    Number of participants experiencing any treatment-emergent serious and/or non-serious adverse events regardless of causality in Epoch 2 was reported.

    Measured: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1

  25. Epoch 2: Number of Participants Experiencing Causally Related Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs)

    AE: any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered IP. AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (e.g., abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (e.g., rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (e.g., peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), outcome of death temporally associated with use of IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. SAE: untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization/results in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is congenital anomaly/birth defect, is medically important event, (e.g., thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia). Non-SAE:AE not meeting this criteria. AE recorded by investigator as possibly/probably related to IP is considered related AE, any AE recorded as unlikely/not related is considered unrelated AE.

    Measured: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1

  26. Epoch 2: Number of Participants With Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs

    An adverse reaction/suspected adverse reaction is defined as an Adverse Event that is considered by the investigator to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or for which the causality is indeterminate or missing, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 hours following the end of IP infusion.

    Measured: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1

  27. Epoch 2: Number of Treatment-emergent Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs) Associated With Infusions Regardless of Causality

    A SAE is defined as an untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets one or more of the following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or results in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a medically important event, thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia. A nonserious AE is an AE that does not meet the criteria. An AR plus suspected AR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. Participants can have more than one adverse event.

    Measured: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1

  28. Epoch 2: Number of Causally Related Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs) Associated With Infusions

    AE: any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered IP. AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (e.g., abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (e.g., rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (e.g., peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), outcome of death temporally associated with use of IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. SAE: untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization/results in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is congenital anomaly/birth defect, is medically important event, (e.g., thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia). Non-SAE:AE not meeting this criteria. AE recorded by investigator as possibly/probably related to IP is considered related AE, any AE recorded as unlikely/not related is considered unrelated AE.

    Measured: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1

  29. Epoch 2: Number of Adverse Events (AEs) Temporally Associated With Infusions

    AEs occurring during an infusion or within 72 hours after completion of an infusion. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. Participants can have more than one adverse event.

    Measured: During an infusion or within 72 hours after completion of an infusion (up to Week 32)

  30. Epoch 2: Number of Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs Associated With Infusions

    A SAE is defined as an untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets one or more of the following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or results in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a medically important event, thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia. A nonserious AE is an AE that does not meet the criteria. An AR plus suspected AR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. Participants can have more than one AR/SAR.

    Measured: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1

  31. Epoch 2: Number of Treatment-emergent Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) Associated With Infusions

    A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as any event not present prior to the initiation of the treatments or any event already present that worsens in either intensity or frequency following exposure to the treatments. Participants can have more than one treatment-emergent systemic AEs.

    Measured: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1

  32. Epoch 2: Number of Treatment-emergent Local Infusion Site Reactions Associated With Infusions

    AE=any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not have causal relationship with treatment. AE can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (e.g., abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (e.g., rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (e.g., peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. Adverse reaction/suspected adverse reaction=AE that is considered by the investigator to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or for which the causality is indeterminate or missing, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 hours following the end of IP infusion. TEAEs are defined as adverse events that occurred during or after administration of the first dose of IP. Infusion site adverse events and injection site adverse events refer to the same type of adverse events.

    Measured: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1

  33. Epoch 2: Number of Infusions for Which the Infusion Rate Was Reduced and/or the Infusion Was Interrupted or Stopped Due to Intolerability and/or Adverse Events (AEs)

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP.

    Measured: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1

  34. Epoch 2: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per Infusion

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. Data for number of events per infusion is assessed at the group level as follows: Per infusion = number of events / total number of infusions administered (started) to participants in the analysis set

    Measured: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1

  35. Epoch 2: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. Data is reported for number of events per participant which is assessed at the group level as follows: AE per participant = number of AEs/ total number of participants in the safety analysis set.

    Measured: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1

  36. Epoch 2: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per 1000 Participant-year

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP.

    Measured: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1

  37. Epoch 2: Rates of Causally Related Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Expressed As Number of Events Per Infusion

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. An AE that is recorded by the investigator as possibly related or probably related to IP was considered a related AE, and any AE recorded as unlikely related or not related was considered unrelated AE. Data for number of events per infusion is assessed at the group level as follows: Per infusion = number of events / total number of infusions administered (started) to participants in the analysis set

    Measured: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1

  38. Epoch 2: Rates of Causally Related Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. An AE that is recorded by the investigator as possibly related or probably related to IP was considered a related AE, and any AE recorded as unlikely related or not related was considered unrelated AE. Data is reported for number of events per participant which is assessed at the group level as follows: AE per participant = number of AEs/ total number of participants in the safety analysis set.

    Measured: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1

  39. Epoch 2: Rates of Causally Related Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant-Year

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. An AE that is recorded by the investigator as possibly related or probably related to IP was considered a related AE, and any AE recorded as unlikely related or not related was considered unrelated AE.

    Measured: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1

  40. Epoch 2: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected Ars, Expressed as Number of Events Per Infusion

    An AR plus suspected AR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. Data for number of events per infusion is assessed at the group level as follows: Per infusion = number of events / total number of infusions administered (started) to participants in the analysis set.

    Measured: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1

  41. Epoch 2: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs, Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant

    An AR plus suspected AR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. Data is reported for number of events per participant which is assessed at the group level as follows: AE per participant = number of AEs/ total number of participants in the safety analysis set.

    Measured: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1

  42. Epoch 2: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs, Expressed as Number of Events Per 1000 Participant-Year

    An AR plus suspected AR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. Data for number of events per 1000 participant-years is assessed as follows: Per 1000 participant-years = 1000 x (number of events / total number of days of exposure, i.e., the sum of duration of treatment for all participants in the safety analysis set, divided by 365.25)

    Measured: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1

  43. Epoch 2: Percentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Functional Ability

    Defined as one or more of the following: a decrease of >=1 point in the adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment disability scale (INCAT) score at 2 consecutive time points; who experience CIDP improvement (defined as ≥8 kilo Pascal (kPa) increase in hand grip strength in the more affected hand; >=4 points increase in Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS)) at the completion of the intravenous (IV) treatment period [6 months] or at the last study visit of the IV treatment period, relative to the pre-IV treatment baseline score.

    Measured: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Sep 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start15 Dec 2015
  3. Primary completion23 Feb 2022
  4. Study completion23 Feb 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
138 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02549170
Sponsor's protocol ID
161403
Other IDs
2014-005496-87, 2014
Status last verified
May 2023
First submitted
11 Sep 2015
Last updated
24 May 2023
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Takeda provides access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) for eligible studies to aid qualified researchers in addressing legitimate scientific objectives (Takeda's data sharing commitment is available on https://clinicaltrials.takeda.com/takedas-commitment?commitment=5). These IPDs will be provided in a secure research environment following approval of a data sharing request, and under the terms of a data sharing agreement.

Publications

  • Bus SR, Wieske L, Keddie S, van Schaik IN, Eftimov F. Subcutaneous immunoglobulin for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2026 Aug 11;8:CD014542. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014542.pub2.

    PubMed 42578463

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing HYQVIA, IGIV GAMMAGARD LIQUID/KIOVIG and IGIV GAMUNEX®-C in people with Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy, run by Baxalta now part of Shire at 83 sites in 22 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 34 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 83 sites in United States, Italy, Brazil, Turkey (Türkiye), Argentina and 17 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 May 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Epoch 1: Relapse Rate (time frame: Week 32 End of Epoch 1 Treatment (EOET1)/Unscheduled relapse visit assessment (UV)/Early Termination (ET)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02549170, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 May 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in