Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating PolyradiculoneuropathyPhase 3NCT02549170
A Study of HyQvia and Gammagard Liquid (Kiovig) in Adults With Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP)
A Phase 3 study testing HYQVIA, IGIV GAMMAGARD LIQUID/KIOVIG and IGIV GAMUNEX®-C in people with Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy, run by Baxalta now part of Shire at 83 sites in 22 countries.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to learn more about the following treatment options in adults with CIDP: Subcutaneous self-infusion with HyQvia. Intravenous infusion with Gammagard/Kiovig. Gammagard and Kiovig are the brand names for the same immunoglobulin compound. The study is in two parts. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy
- What is being tested?
- HYQVIA, IGIV GAMMAGARD LIQUID/KIOVIG and IGIV GAMUNEX®-C
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 138 participants
- Where
- 83 sitesin 22 countries
- Study dates
- 15 Dec 2015to 23 Feb 2022
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Males or females of age greater than or equal to (>=)18 years old at the time of screening.
- Participant has a documented diagnosis of definite or probable Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) (focal atypical CIDP and pure sensory atypical CIDP will be excluded), as confirmed by a neurologist specializing/experienced in neuromuscular diseases to be consistent with the European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) 2010 criteria (European Federation of Neurological Societies, 2010). Fulfillment of electrodiagnostic criteria must be confirmed by an independent qualified/experienced central reader.
- Participant has responded to IgG treatment in the past (partial or complete resolution of neurological symptoms and deficits), and must currently be on stable doses of IGIV treatment within the dose range equivalent to a cumulative monthly dose of 0.4 to 2.4 gram per kilogram (g/kg) BW (inclusive) administered intravenously for at least 12 weeks prior to screening. The dosing interval of IGIV treatment must be between 2 and 6 weeks (inclusive). Variations in the dosing interval of up to ± 7 days or monthly dose amount of up to ± 20% between participant's pre-study Immunoglobulin G (IgG) infusions are within acceptable limits.
- INCAT disability score between 0 and 7 (inclusive). Participants with INCAT scores of 0, 1 (whether from upper or lower extremities), or 2 (if at least 1 point is from an upper extremity) at screening and/or baseline will be required to have a history of significant disability as defined by an INCAT disability score of 2 (must be exclusively from the lower extremities) or greater documented in the medical record. Participants will be eligible if one of the below eligibility criteria are met:
- Screening and Baseline INCAT disability score of between 3 and 7 inclusive.
- Screening and/or Baseline INCAT disability score of 2 (both points are from lower extremities).
Show all 11Show fewer
- Screening and/or Baseline INCAT disability score of 2 (both points are not from lower extremities) AND has at least a score of 2 or greater documented in the medical record prior to screening. If a score was greater than 2 documented in the medical record prior to screening at least 2 points must be from lower extremities.
- Screening and/or Baseline INCAT disability score of 0 or 1 AND has at least a score of 2 or greater (both from lower extremities) documented in the medical record prior to screening, at least 2 points must be from lower extremities.
- If female of childbearing potential, the participant must have a negative pregnancy test at screening and agree to employ a highly effective contraceptive measure throughout the course of the study and for at least 30 days after the last administration of investigational product (IP).
- Participant is willing and able to sign an Informed Consent Form (ICF).
- Participant is willing and able to comply with the requirements of the protocol.
Who cannot join
- Participants with Focal atypical CIDP or pure sensory atypical CIDP.
- Any neuropathy of other causes, including:
- Hereditary demyelinating neuropathies, such as hereditary sensory and motor neuropathy (HSMN) (Charcot-Marie-Tooth [CMT] disease), and hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathies (HSANs).
- Neuropathies secondary to infections, disorders, or systemic diseases such as Borrelia burgdorferi infection (Lyme disease), diphtheria, systemic lupus erythematosus, POEMS (polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, M-protein, and skin changes) syndrome, osteosclerotic myeloma, diabetic and non-diabetic lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy, lymphoma, and amyloidosis.
- Multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy (MADSAM).
- Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN).
Show all 34Show fewer
- Drug-, biologic-, chemotherapy-, or toxin-induced peripheral neuropathy.
- Immunoglobulin M (IgM) paraproteinemia, including IgM monoclonal gammopathy with high titer antibodies to myelin-associated glycoprotein.
- Prominent sphincter disturbance.
- Central demyelinating disorders (eg, multiple sclerosis).
- Any chronic or debilitating disease, or central nervous disorder that causes neurological symptoms or may interfere with assessment of CIDP or outcome measures (eg, arthritis, stroke, Parkinson's disease, and diabetic peripheral neuropathy) (Participants with clinically diagnosed diabetes mellitus who do not have diabetic peripheral neuropathy, who have adequate glycemic control with Hemoglobin A1C; also known as glycosylated or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) of less than (<) 7.5% at screening, and who agree to maintain adequate glycemic control during the study are allowed).
- Congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] Class III/IV), unstable angina, unstable cardiac arrhythmias, or uncontrolled hypertension (ie, diastolic blood pressure greater than (>) 100 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) and/or systolic blood pressure >160 mmHg).
- History of deep vein thrombosis or thromboembolic events (eg, cerebrovascular accident, pulmonary embolism) in the past 12 months.
- Condition(s) which could alter protein catabolism and/or IgG utilization (eg, protein-losing enteropathies, nephrotic syndrome).
- Known history of chronic kidney disease, or glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of <60 milliliter per minute per 1.73 square meter (mL/min/1.73m^2) estimated based on CKD-EPI equation (Levey et al., 2009) at the time of screening.
- Participant with active malignancy requiring chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, or history of malignancy with less than 2 years of complete remission prior to screening. Exceptions are: adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, carcinoma in situ of the cervix, and stable prostate cancer not requiring treatment.
- Clinically significant anemia or hemoglobin (Hgb) level of less than (<) 10.0 grams per deciliter (g/dL) at screening.
- Hypersensitivity or adverse reactions (AR's) (eg, urticaria, breathing difficulty, severe hypotension, or anaphylaxis) to human blood products such as human IgG, albumin, or other blood components.
- Known allergy to hyaluronidase of human (including recombinant human hyaluronidase) or animal origin (such as bee or wasp venom).
- Known history of or immunoglobulin A (IgA) deficiency (<8 milligram per deciliter [mg/dL]) at screening.
- Abnormal laboratory values at screening:
- Serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 2.5* upper limit of normal (ULN)
- Platelet count <100,000 cells per microliter (cells/mcL).
- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <1000 cells/mcL.
- Ongoing/active infection with hepatitis A virus (HAV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) Type 1/2 infection.
- The participant has received or is currently receiving treatment with immunomodulatory/ immunosuppressive agents within 6 months prior to screening.
- Participant has received or is currently receiving treatment with corticosteroids dose within 8 weeks prior to screening, regardless of indication.
- Participant has undergone plasma exchange (PE) within 3 months prior to screening.
- The participant has any disorder or condition that in the investigator's judgment may impede the participant's participation in the study, pose increased risk to the participant, or confound the results of the study.
- The participant is nursing or intends to begin nursing during the course of the study.
- Participant has participated in another clinical study involving an IP or investigational device within 30 days prior to enrollment, or is scheduled to participate in another clinical study (with the exception of the HYQVIA/HyQvia extension study in CIDP) involving an IP or investigational device during the course of this study.
- The participant is a family member or employee of the investigator.
- Participants with acquired or inherited thrombophilic disorders. These will include the specific types of acquired or inherited thrombophilic disorders that could put participants at risk of develop thrombotic events. Examples include:
- Hereditary Thrombophilias i. Factor V Leiden mutation. ii. Prothrombin 20210A mutation. iii. Protein C deficiency. iv. Protein S deficiency. v. Antithrombin deficiency. b. Acquired thrombophilias i. Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. ii. Activated protein C Resistance acquired. iii. Homocystinemia.
Trial locations and contacts
83 sites in 22 countries.
83 sites in 22 countries
United States19 sites
Regents of the University of colorado
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Austin Neuromuscular Center
Austin, Texas, 78756
Immunoe Research Centers
Centennial, Colorado, 80112
University of Cincinnati
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267-0525
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
The Methodist Hospital Research Institute
Houston, Texas, 77030
University Texas Physicians CAR
Houston, Texas, 77030
University of Kansas Medical Center Research Institute, Inc.
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160
Neurology Center of Las Vegas
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89128
Hospital for Special Surgery
New York, New York, 10032
Rutgers New Jersey Medical School
Newark, New Jersey, 07103
University of California-Irvine
Orange, California, 92868
Barrow Neurological Institute
Phoenix, Arizona, 85013
Arizona Neuromuscular Research Center
Phoenix, Arizona, 85028
William Beaumont Hospital
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073-6769
Forbes Norris Mda/als Ctr
San Francisco, California, 94109
HonorHealth Neurology
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85251
University of South Florida
Tampa, Florida, 33612
Wake Forest University
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157
Italy11 sites
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria San Martino
Genova, 16132
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico G. Martino
Messina, 98122
Casa di Cura del Policlinico
Milan, 20144
Fondazione Istituto Neurologico Casimiro Mondino
Pavia, 27100
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana
Pisa, 56126
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico Umberto I - Università di Roma La Sapienza
Roma, 00161
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico Tor Vergata
Rome, Roma, 00133
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
Rozzano, Milano, 20089
IRCCS Ospedale Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza
San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, 71013
Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino
Torino, 10126
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Santa Maria della Misericordia
Udine, 33100
Brazil5 sites
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da UNICAMP
Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-887
Instituto de Neurologia de Curitiba - Hospital Ecoville
Curitiba, Paraná, 81210-310
HUAP - UFF - Hospital Universitario Antonio Pedro - Universidade Federal Fluminense
Niterói, Rio Do Janeiro, 24033-900
Hospital das Clínicas FMRP-USP
Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14048-900
Hospital Sao Paulo
São Paulo, São Paulo, 04039-032
Turkey (Türkiye)5 sites
Pamukkale Uni. Med. Fac.
Denizli, 20070
Istanbul University Cerrahpasa - Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty
Istanbul, 34098
Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine
Izmir, 35340
Selcuk Universitesi Selcuklu Tip Fakultesi Hastanesi
Konya, 42075
Celal Bayar University Medical Faculty
Manisa, 45040
Argentina4 sites
Hospital Italiano
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1181ACH
Hospital Britanico de Buenos Aires
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, 1280
Complejo Medico de la Policia Federal Argentina Churruca Visca
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, 1416
Instituto de Investigaciones Neurologicas Raul Carrea, FLENI
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, C1428AQK
France4 sites
Groupe Hospitalier Pellegrin - Hôpital Pellegrin
Bordeaux, Gironde, 33076
Hopital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer
Bron, Rhone, 69677
Hôpital de la Timone
Marseille, Bouches-du-Rhône, 13385
CHU de Nice Hôpital Pasteur 2
Nice, Alpes Maritimes, 06001
Poland4 sites
COPERNICUS Podmiot Leczniczy Sp. z o. o.,
Gdansk, 80-803
Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne
Gdansk, 80-952
Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny nr 1 im. Norberta Barlickiego
Lodz, 90-153
Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny Nr 4 w Lublinie
Lublin, 20-090
Spain4 sites
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona, 08025
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona, 08035
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08907
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
Seville, 41013
Canada3 sites
University of Alberta Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7
LHSC - University Hospital
London, Ontario, N6A 5A5
Toronto General Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4
Croatia3 sites
Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka
Rijeka, 51000
Clinical Hospital Centar Zagreb
Zagreb, 10000
University Hospital Centre "Sestre Milosrdnice"
Zagreb, 10000
Czechia3 sites
Fakultni nemocnice Brno
Brno, 625 00
Fakultni nemocnice Ostrava
Ostrava - Poruba, 708 52
Fakultni nemocnice v Motole
Prague, 150 06
Germany3 sites
Universitaetsklinikum Essen
Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 45147
Universitaetsmedizin Goettingen
Göttingen, Lower Saxony, 37075
Universitaetsklinikum Leipzig AoeR
Leipzig, Saxony, 04103
Serbia3 sites
Clinical Center of Serbia
Belgrade, 11000
Military Medical Academy
Belgrade, 11000
Clinical Center Nis
Niš, 18000
United Kingdom3 sites
Southmead Hospital
Bristol, Avon, BS10 5NB
The Walton Centre
Liverpool, Merseyside, L9 7LJ
King's College Hospital
London, Greater London, SE5 9RS
Slovakia2 sites
Univerzitna nemocnica Bratislava Nemocnica ak. L. Derera, II. Neurologicka klinika
Bratislava, 83101
Fakultna nemocnica Nitra
Nitra, 95001
Colombia1 site
Institucion Prestadora de Servicios de Salud de la Universidad de Antioquia "IPS UNIVERSITARIA"
Medellín, 00000
Mexico1 site
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutricion Dr. Salvador Zubiran
Mexico City, Mexico City, 14080
About this study
Official title: A Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Immune Globulin Infusion 10% (Human) With Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase (HYQVIA/HyQvia) and Immune Globulin Infusion (Human), 10% (GAMMAGARD LIQUID/KIOVIG) for the Treatment of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP)
The aim of this study is to learn more about the following treatment options in adults with CIDP:
- Subcutaneous self-infusion with HyQvia.
- Intravenous infusion with Gammagard/Kiovig. Gammagard and Kiovig are the brand names for the same immunoglobulin compound.
Read more
The study is in two parts. In Part 1, participants receive either HyQvia or a placebo subcutaneously. In Part 2 (only for participants who have a CIPD relapse during Part 1), participants will receive Gammagard Liquid/Kiovig intravenously. US participants will receive Gamunex-C.
The first SC infusion will be given in the study clinic. The remaining SC infusions may be given in the study clinic or the participant's home. This will be decided by the study doctor and whether the participant or their caregiver can do the self-infusion.
- Being tested
- HYQVIA, 0.25% albumin placebo solution with rHuPH20, IGIV GAMMAGARD LIQUID/KIOVIG, IGIV GAMUNEX®-C
- Keywords
- Autoimmune Diseases, Polyneuropathies, Nervous System Diseases, Peripheral Nervous System Diseases, Polyradiculoneuropathy, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System, Immunoglobulins, Immune System Diseases, Demyelinating Diseases, Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating, Neuromuscular Diseases
- Medical subject headings
- Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating, Autoimmune Diseases, Polyneuropathies, Nervous System Diseases, Peripheral Nervous System Diseases, Polyradiculoneuropathy, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System, Immune System Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HYQVIABiological
Also called 10%) with recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20), Immune Globulin Infusion 10% (Human) (IGI, IGI, 10% with rHuPH20
Participants will receive HYQVIA/HyQvia SC which contains both Immune Globulin Infusion 10% (Human) (IGI, 10%) and recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20).
0.25% albumin placebo solution with rHuPH20Biological
Participants will receive placebo solution (0.25% human albumin in Lactated Ringer's solution) and rHuPH20.
IGIV GAMMAGARD LIQUID/KIOVIGBiological
Also called Immune Globulin Infusion (Human), Intravenous immunoglobulin G, 10% (GAMMAGARD LIQUID/KIOVIG), GAMMAGARD LIQUID
Participants will receive GAMMAGARD LIQUID/KIOVIG
IGIV GAMUNEX®-CBiological
Also called Immune Globulin Infusion (Human), Intravenous immunoglobulin G, Approved IGIV product for US sites
Participants will receive GAMUNEX®-C
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQvia | Experimental | Participants received HYQVIA/HyQvia (rHuPH20) 80 U/g IG, following by SC injection of immunoglobulin (IGI) 10% at the same monthly equivalent IG dose as the individual participant's pre-randomized IG dose when administered every 2, 3, or 4 weeks for 30.28 weeks or until relapse. Receives: Biological: HYQVIA |
| Epoch 1: Placebo with rHuPH20 | Placebo comparator | Participants received rHuPH20 80 U/I0 mL placebo solution, followed by SC placebo infusion at matching infusion volume as the participant's pre-randomization monthly equivalent IG dose when administered every 2, 3, or 4 weeks for 31.54 weeks or until relapse. Receives: Biological: 0.25% albumin placebo solution with rHuPH20 |
| Epoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIG | Experimental | Participants who were enrolled to receive placebo with rHuPH20 and achieved chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) relapse during Epoch 1 received the induction dose of GGL/KIOVIG 2 g/kg bi-weekly (BW), followed by IV infusion at the same monthly equivalent dose as the participant's pre-randomization IGIV dosing regimen when administered every 3 weeks for 25.63 weeks or until relapse. Receives: Biological: IGIV GAMMAGARD LIQUID/KIOVIG |
| Epoch 2: E1: HYQVIA Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIG | Experimental | Participants who were enrolled to receive HYQVIA/HyQvia (rHuPH20) and achieved CIDP relapse during Epoch 1 received the induction dose of GGL/KIOVIG 2 g/kg BW, followed by IV infusion at the same monthly equivalent dose as the participant's pre-randomization IGIV dosing regimen when administered every 3 weeks for 28.67 weeks or until relapse. Receives: Biological: IGIV GAMMAGARD LIQUID/KIOVIG |
| Epoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GAMMUNEX-C | Experimental | Participants who were enrolled to receive placebo with rHuPH20 and achieved CIDP relapse during Epoch 1 received the induction dose of GAMMUNEX-C 2 g/kg BW, followed by IV infusion at the same monthly equivalent dose as the participant's pre-randomization IGIV dosing regimen when administered every 3 weeks for 24.33 weeks or until relapse. Receives: Biological: IGIV GAMUNEX®-C |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Epoch 1: Relapse Rate
Relapse rate is defined as the percentage of participants who experience a worsening of functional disability. Worsening of functional disability defined as an increase of >=1 point relative to the pre- subcutaneous (SC) treatment baseline score in 2 consecutive adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability score. The INCAT disability score is an effective and responsive tool to assess clinical response to treatment in CIDP. The disability score ranges from 0 to 10 points, where 0 is normal (eg, no upper limb problems and walking not affected) and 10 is severely incapacitated (eg, inability to move either arm for any purposeful movement and restricted to wheelchair, unable to stand and walk a few steps with help).
Measured: Week 32 End of Epoch 1 Treatment (EOET1)/Unscheduled relapse visit assessment (UV)/Early Termination (ET)
Epoch 2: Responder Rate
Responder rate is defined as clinically meaningful improvement in functional ability defined as a decrease of >=1 point in the adjusted INCAT disability score at the completion of the intravenous (IV) treatment period [6 months] or at the last study visit of the IV treatment period, relative to the pre-IV treatment baseline score.
Measured: Up to 6 Months post-Epoch 1 (End of Epoch 2 Treatment [EOE2T])/Unscheduled visit assessment (UV)/Early Termination
Secondary outcomes (43)
Epoch 1: Percentage of Participants Who Experience a Worsening of Functional Disability
Defined as one or more of the following: an increase of >=1 point relative to the pre-subcutaneous (SC) treatment baseline score in 2 consecutive adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment disability scale (INCAT) scores; who experience CIDP worsening (defined as a >=8 kilo Pascal (kPa) decrease in the hand grip strength in the more affected hand); >=4 points decrease in raw Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS) relative to the pre-SC treatment baseline score (at the time of withdrawal from the SC treatment period). Participants are rounded off to nearest single decimal point.
Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Time to Relapse
Time to relapse is defined as time from the date of the first SC administration of HYQVIA/HyQvia or placebo with rHuPH20 to the date of relapse. Participants who did not relapse were censored at their end of study.
Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 1: Change From Pre-Subcutaneous (SC) Treatment Baseline in Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS)
The Rasch-Built Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS) is a participant self-reported, linearly-weighted overall disability scale that was specifically designed to capture activity and social participation limitations in participant with immune-mediated peripheral neuropathies including CIDP. The R-ODS is comprised of 24 items for which participants are asked to rate their functioning (i.e, no difficulty, some difficulty, or could not do) related to a variety of everyday tasks at the moment of completion. The centile metric R-ODS score range is 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better condition. The centile metric R-ODS score was used in the ANCOVA analysis. ANCOVA was used for the analysis.
Measured: Pre-subcutaneous (SC) treatment baseline, end of Epoch 1 treatment (approximately 7.3 months)
Epoch 1: Number of Participants Experiencing Any Treatment-Emergent Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs), Regardless of Causality
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an Investigational Product (IP) that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. A SAE is defined as an untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets one or more of the following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or results in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a medically important event, thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia. A nonserious AE is an AE that does not meet the criteria.
Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 1: Number of Participants Experiencing Causally Related Serious and/or Non-Serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs)
AE=any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered IP. AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (e.g.,abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (e.g.,rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (e.g.,peritonitis,bacteremia,etc.), outcome of death temporally associated with use of IP,considered causally related to the IP. SAE=untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization/results in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is congenital anomaly/birth defect, is medically important event, thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia. Non-SAE=AE not meeting this criteria. AE recorded by investigator as possibly/probably related to IP is considered related AE, any AE recorded as unlikely/not related is considered unrelated AE.
Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 1: Number of Participants With Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs
An AR plus suspected AR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. A SAE is defined as an untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets one or more of the following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or results in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a medically important event, thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia. A nonserious AE is an AE that does not meet the criteria.
Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 1: Number of Treatment-emergent Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs) Associated With Infusions Regardless of Causality
AE: any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. SAE: an untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets one or more of the following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or results in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a medically important event, thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia. A nonserious AE is an AE that does not meet the criteria. Participants can have more than one adverse event.
Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 1: Number of Causally Related Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs) Associated With Infusions
AE: any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered IP. AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (e.g., abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (e.g., rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (e.g., peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), outcome of death temporally associated with use of IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. SAE: untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization/results in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is congenital anomaly/birth defect, is medically important event, (e.g., thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia). Non-SAE:AE not meeting this criteria. AE recorded by investigator as possibly/probably related to IP is considered related AE, any AE recorded as unlikely/not related is considered unrelated AE.
Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 1: Number of Adverse Events (AEs) Temporally Associated With Infusions
AEs occurring during an infusion or within 72 hours after completion of an infusion. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an Investigational Product (IP) that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. Participants can have more than one temporally associated with infusion adverse event.
Measured: During an infusion or within 72 hours after completion of an infusion (up to Week 32)
Epoch 1: Number of Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs Associated With Infusions
AR plus suspected AR: any AE that meets any of the criteria: AE considered by either investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. SAE: untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets one or more of following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or results in prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a medically important event, thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia. Nonserious AE is AE that does not meet the criteria. Infusion per event = number of events / total number of infusions administered (started) to participants in analysis set. Participants can have more than one AR/suspected AR associated with infusion.
Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 1: Number of Treatment-emergent Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) Associated With Infusions
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as any event not present prior to the initiation of the treatments or any event already present that worsens in either intensity or frequency following exposure to the treatments. Participants can have more than one TEAE associated with infusion.
Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 1: Number of Treatment-emergent Local Infusion Site Reactions Associated With Infusions
AE=any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not have causal relationship with treatment. AE can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (e.g., abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (e.g., rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (e.g., peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. Adverse reaction/suspected adverse reaction=AE that is considered by the investigator to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or for which the causality is indeterminate or missing, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 hours following the end of IP infusion. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are defined as adverse events that occurred during or after administration of the first dose of IP. Infusion site adverse events and injection site adverse events refer to the same type of adverse events.
Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 1: Number of Infusions in Participants for Which the Infusion Rate Was Reduced And/Or the Infusion Was Interrupted or Stopped Due to Intolerability And/Or Adverse Events (AEs)
Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 1: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per Infusion
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. Data for number of events per infusion is assessed at the group level as follows: Per infusion = number of events / total number of infusions administered (started) to participants in the analysis set.
Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 1: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. Data is reported for number of events per participant which is assessed at the group level as follows: AE per participant = number of AEs/ total number of participants in the safety analysis set.
Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 1: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per 1000 Participant-year
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. Data for number of events per 1000 participant-years is assessed as follows: Per 1000 participant-years = 1000 x (number of events / total number of days of exposure, i.e., the sum of duration of treatment for all participants in the safety analysis set, divided by 365.25)
Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 1: Rates of Causally Related Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Expressed As Number of Events Per Infusion
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. An AE that is recorded by the investigator as possibly related or probably related to IP was considered a related AE, and any AE recorded as unlikely related or not related was considered unrelated AE. Data for number of events per infusion is assessed at the group level as follows: Per infusion = number of events / total number of infusions administered (started) to participants in the analysis set.
Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 1: Rates of Causally Related Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Expressed As Number of Events Per Participant
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. An AE that is recorded by the investigator as possibly related or probably related to IP was considered a related AE, and any AE recorded as unlikely related or not related was considered unrelated AE. Data is reported for number of events per participant which is assessed at the group level as follows: AE per participant = number of AEs/ total number of participants in the safety analysis set.
Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 1: Rates of Causally Related Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant-year
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. An AE that is recorded by the investigator as possibly related or probably related to IP was considered a related AE, and any AE recorded as unlikely related or not related was considered unrelated AE.
Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 1: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs, Expressed as Number of Events Per Infusion
An AR plus suspected AR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. Data for number of events per infusion is assessed at the group level as follows: Per infusion = number of events / total number of infusions administered (started) to participants in the analysis set.
Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 1: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs, Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant
An AR plus suspected AR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. Data is reported for number of events per participant which is assessed at the group level as follows: AE per participant = number of AEs/ total number of participants in the safety analysis set.
Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 1: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs, Expressed as Number of Events Per 1000 Participant-Year
An AR plus suspected AR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. Data for number of events per 1000 participant-years is assessed as follows: Per 1000 participant-years = 1000 x (number of events / total number of days of exposure, i.e., the sum of duration of treatment for all participants in the safety analysis set, divided by 365.25)
Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 1: Number of Participants Who Develop Binding and/or Neutralizing Antibodies to Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase (rHuPH20)
Number of participants who developed binding and/or neutralizing antibodies to rHuPH20 in Epoch 1 were reported. High-binding antibodies is defined as number of participants who had at least one anti-rHuPH20 antibody titer ≥1:160 during treatment.
Measured: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 2: Number of Participants Experiencing Any Treatment-emergent Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs), Regardless of Causality
Number of participants experiencing any treatment-emergent serious and/or non-serious adverse events regardless of causality in Epoch 2 was reported.
Measured: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Epoch 2: Number of Participants Experiencing Causally Related Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs)
AE: any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered IP. AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (e.g., abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (e.g., rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (e.g., peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), outcome of death temporally associated with use of IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. SAE: untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization/results in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is congenital anomaly/birth defect, is medically important event, (e.g., thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia). Non-SAE:AE not meeting this criteria. AE recorded by investigator as possibly/probably related to IP is considered related AE, any AE recorded as unlikely/not related is considered unrelated AE.
Measured: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Epoch 2: Number of Participants With Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs
An adverse reaction/suspected adverse reaction is defined as an Adverse Event that is considered by the investigator to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or for which the causality is indeterminate or missing, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 hours following the end of IP infusion.
Measured: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Epoch 2: Number of Treatment-emergent Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs) Associated With Infusions Regardless of Causality
A SAE is defined as an untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets one or more of the following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or results in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a medically important event, thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia. A nonserious AE is an AE that does not meet the criteria. An AR plus suspected AR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. Participants can have more than one adverse event.
Measured: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Epoch 2: Number of Causally Related Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs) Associated With Infusions
AE: any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered IP. AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (e.g., abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (e.g., rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (e.g., peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), outcome of death temporally associated with use of IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. SAE: untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization/results in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is congenital anomaly/birth defect, is medically important event, (e.g., thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia). Non-SAE:AE not meeting this criteria. AE recorded by investigator as possibly/probably related to IP is considered related AE, any AE recorded as unlikely/not related is considered unrelated AE.
Measured: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Epoch 2: Number of Adverse Events (AEs) Temporally Associated With Infusions
AEs occurring during an infusion or within 72 hours after completion of an infusion. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. Participants can have more than one adverse event.
Measured: During an infusion or within 72 hours after completion of an infusion (up to Week 32)
Epoch 2: Number of Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs Associated With Infusions
A SAE is defined as an untoward medical occurrence that at any dose meets one or more of the following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or results in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a medically important event, thromboembolic events, hemolytic anemia. A nonserious AE is an AE that does not meet the criteria. An AR plus suspected AR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. Participants can have more than one AR/SAR.
Measured: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Epoch 2: Number of Treatment-emergent Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) Associated With Infusions
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as any event not present prior to the initiation of the treatments or any event already present that worsens in either intensity or frequency following exposure to the treatments. Participants can have more than one treatment-emergent systemic AEs.
Measured: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Epoch 2: Number of Treatment-emergent Local Infusion Site Reactions Associated With Infusions
AE=any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not have causal relationship with treatment. AE can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (e.g., abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (e.g., rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (e.g., peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. Adverse reaction/suspected adverse reaction=AE that is considered by the investigator to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or for which the causality is indeterminate or missing, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 hours following the end of IP infusion. TEAEs are defined as adverse events that occurred during or after administration of the first dose of IP. Infusion site adverse events and injection site adverse events refer to the same type of adverse events.
Measured: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Epoch 2: Number of Infusions for Which the Infusion Rate Was Reduced and/or the Infusion Was Interrupted or Stopped Due to Intolerability and/or Adverse Events (AEs)
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP.
Measured: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Epoch 2: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per Infusion
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. Data for number of events per infusion is assessed at the group level as follows: Per infusion = number of events / total number of infusions administered (started) to participants in the analysis set
Measured: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Epoch 2: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. Data is reported for number of events per participant which is assessed at the group level as follows: AE per participant = number of AEs/ total number of participants in the safety analysis set.
Measured: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Epoch 2: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per 1000 Participant-year
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP.
Measured: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Epoch 2: Rates of Causally Related Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Expressed As Number of Events Per Infusion
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. An AE that is recorded by the investigator as possibly related or probably related to IP was considered a related AE, and any AE recorded as unlikely related or not related was considered unrelated AE. Data for number of events per infusion is assessed at the group level as follows: Per infusion = number of events / total number of infusions administered (started) to participants in the analysis set
Measured: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Epoch 2: Rates of Causally Related Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. An AE that is recorded by the investigator as possibly related or probably related to IP was considered a related AE, and any AE recorded as unlikely related or not related was considered unrelated AE. Data is reported for number of events per participant which is assessed at the group level as follows: AE per participant = number of AEs/ total number of participants in the safety analysis set.
Measured: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Epoch 2: Rates of Causally Related Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant-Year
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (eg, rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (eg, peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an IP, whether or not considered causally related to the IP. An AE that is recorded by the investigator as possibly related or probably related to IP was considered a related AE, and any AE recorded as unlikely related or not related was considered unrelated AE.
Measured: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Epoch 2: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected Ars, Expressed as Number of Events Per Infusion
An AR plus suspected AR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. Data for number of events per infusion is assessed at the group level as follows: Per infusion = number of events / total number of infusions administered (started) to participants in the analysis set.
Measured: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Epoch 2: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs, Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant
An AR plus suspected AR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. Data is reported for number of events per participant which is assessed at the group level as follows: AE per participant = number of AEs/ total number of participants in the safety analysis set.
Measured: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Epoch 2: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs, Expressed as Number of Events Per 1000 Participant-Year
An AR plus suspected AR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 h following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. Data for number of events per 1000 participant-years is assessed as follows: Per 1000 participant-years = 1000 x (number of events / total number of days of exposure, i.e., the sum of duration of treatment for all participants in the safety analysis set, divided by 365.25)
Measured: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Epoch 2: Percentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Functional Ability
Defined as one or more of the following: a decrease of >=1 point in the adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment disability scale (INCAT) score at 2 consecutive time points; who experience CIDP improvement (defined as ≥8 kilo Pascal (kPa) increase in hand grip strength in the more affected hand; >=4 points increase in Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS)) at the completion of the intravenous (IV) treatment period [6 months] or at the last study visit of the IV treatment period, relative to the pre-IV treatment baseline score.
Measured: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Sep 2015 (estimated)
- Study start15 Dec 2015
- Primary completion23 Feb 2022
- Study completion23 Feb 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating PolyradiculoneuropathyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 138 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Baxalta now part of Shire
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Study Director, Study director, Shire
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02549170
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 161403
- Other IDs
- 2014-005496-87, 2014
- Status last verified
- May 2023
- First submitted
- 11 Sep 2015
- Last updated
- 24 May 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Takeda provides access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) for eligible studies to aid qualified researchers in addressing legitimate scientific objectives (Takeda's data sharing commitment is available on https://clinicaltrials.takeda.com/takedas-commitment?commitment=5). These IPDs will be provided in a secure research environment following approval of a data sharing request, and under the terms of a data sharing agreement.
Publications
Bus SR, Wieske L, Keddie S, van Schaik IN, Eftimov F. Subcutaneous immunoglobulin for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2026 Aug 11;8:CD014542. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014542.pub2.
PubMed 42578463
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 May 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Immune Globulin Infusion 10% (Human) With Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase (HYQVIA/HyQvia) and Immune Globulin Infusion (Human), 10% (GAMMAGARD LIQUID/KIOVIG) for the Treatment of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02549170
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 161403
- Keywords
- Autoimmune Diseases, Polyneuropathies, Nervous System Diseases, Peripheral Nervous System Diseases, Polyradiculoneuropathy, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System, Immunoglobulins, Immune System Diseases
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 138 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Baxalta now part of ShireIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc.
- Study start
- 15 Dec 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 23 Feb 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 23 Feb 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Sep 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 24 May 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to learn more about the following treatment options in adults with CIDP:
- Subcutaneous self-infusion with HyQvia.
- Intravenous infusion with Gammagard/Kiovig. Gammagard and Kiovig are the brand names for the same immunoglobulin compound.
The study is in two parts. In Part 1, participants receive either HyQvia or a placebo subcutaneously. In Part 2 (only for participants who have a CIPD relapse during Part 1), participants will receive Gammagard Liquid/Kiovig intravenously. US participants will receive Gamunex-C.
The first SC infusion will be given in the study clinic. The remaining SC infusions may be given in the study clinic or the participant's home. This will be decided by the study doctor and whether the participant or their caregiver can do the self-infusion.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 5
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQvia | Experimental | Biological: HYQVIAParticipants received HYQVIA/HyQvia (rHuPH20) 80 U/g IG, following by SC injection of immunoglobulin (IGI) 10% at the same monthly equivalent IG dose as the individual participant's pre-randomized IG dose when administered every 2, 3, or 4 weeks for 30.28 weeks or until relapse. |
| Epoch 1: Placebo with rHuPH20 | Placebo comparator | Biological: 0.25% albumin placebo solution with rHuPH20Participants received rHuPH20 80 U/I0 mL placebo solution, followed by SC placebo infusion at matching infusion volume as the participant's pre-randomization monthly equivalent IG dose when administered every 2, 3, or 4 weeks for 31.54 weeks or until relapse. |
| Epoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIG | Experimental | Biological: IGIV GAMMAGARD LIQUID/KIOVIGParticipants who were enrolled to receive placebo with rHuPH20 and achieved chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) relapse during Epoch 1 received the induction dose of GGL/KIOVIG 2 g/kg bi-weekly (BW), followed by IV infusion at the same monthly equivalent dose as the participant's pre-randomization IGIV dosing regimen when administered every 3 weeks for 25.63 weeks or until relapse. |
| Epoch 2: E1: HYQVIA Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIG | Experimental | Biological: IGIV GAMMAGARD LIQUID/KIOVIGParticipants who were enrolled to receive HYQVIA/HyQvia (rHuPH20) and achieved CIDP relapse during Epoch 1 received the induction dose of GGL/KIOVIG 2 g/kg BW, followed by IV infusion at the same monthly equivalent dose as the participant's pre-randomization IGIV dosing regimen when administered every 3 weeks for 28.67 weeks or until relapse. |
| Epoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GAMMUNEX-C | Experimental | Biological: IGIV GAMUNEX®-CParticipants who were enrolled to receive placebo with rHuPH20 and achieved CIDP relapse during Epoch 1 received the induction dose of GAMMUNEX-C 2 g/kg BW, followed by IV infusion at the same monthly equivalent dose as the participant's pre-randomization IGIV dosing regimen when administered every 3 weeks for 24.33 weeks or until relapse. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Males or females of age greater than or equal to (>=)18 years old at the time of screening.
- Participant has a documented diagnosis of definite or probable Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) (focal atypical CIDP and pure sensory atypical CIDP will be excluded), as confirmed by a neurologist specializing/experienced in neuromuscular diseases to be consistent with the European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) 2010 criteria (European Federation of Neurological Societies, 2010). Fulfillment of electrodiagnostic criteria must be confirmed by an independent qualified/experienced central reader.
- Participant has responded to IgG treatment in the past (partial or complete resolution of neurological symptoms and deficits), and must currently be on stable doses of IGIV treatment within the dose range equivalent to a cumulative monthly dose of 0.4 to 2.4 gram per kilogram (g/kg) BW (inclusive) administered intravenously for at least 12 weeks prior to screening. The dosing interval of IGIV treatment must be between 2 and 6 weeks (inclusive). Variations in the dosing interval of up to ± 7 days or monthly dose amount of up to ± 20% between participant's pre-study Immunoglobulin G (IgG) infusions are within acceptable limits.
- INCAT disability score between 0 and 7 (inclusive). Participants with INCAT scores of 0, 1 (whether from upper or lower extremities), or 2 (if at least 1 point is from an upper extremity) at screening and/or baseline will be required to have a history of significant disability as defined by an INCAT disability score of 2 (must be exclusively from the lower extremities) or greater documented in the medical record. Participants will be eligible if one of the below eligibility criteria are met:
- Screening and Baseline INCAT disability score of between 3 and 7 inclusive.
Key exclusion criteria (34 listed)
- Participants with Focal atypical CIDP or pure sensory atypical CIDP.
- Any neuropathy of other causes, including:
- Immunoglobulin M (IgM) paraproteinemia, including IgM monoclonal gammopathy with high titer antibodies to myelin-associated glycoprotein.
- Prominent sphincter disturbance.
- Central demyelinating disorders (eg, multiple sclerosis).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| HYQVIAAlso: 10%) with recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20), Immune Globulin Infusion 10% (Human) (IGI, IGI, 10% with rHuPH20Participants will receive HYQVIA/HyQvia SC which contains both Immune Globulin Infusion 10% (Human) (IGI, 10%) and recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20). | Biological | Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQvia |
| 0.25% albumin placebo solution with rHuPH20Participants will receive placebo solution (0.25% human albumin in Lactated Ringer's solution) and rHuPH20. | Biological | Epoch 1: Placebo with rHuPH20 |
| IGIV GAMMAGARD LIQUID/KIOVIGAlso: Immune Globulin Infusion (Human), Intravenous immunoglobulin G, 10% (GAMMAGARD LIQUID/KIOVIG), GAMMAGARD LIQUIDParticipants will receive GAMMAGARD LIQUID/KIOVIG | Biological | Epoch 2: E1: HYQVIA Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIG, Epoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIG |
| IGIV GAMUNEX®-CAlso: Immune Globulin Infusion (Human), Intravenous immunoglobulin G, Approved IGIV product for US sitesParticipants will receive GAMUNEX®-C | Biological | Epoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GAMMUNEX-C |
Primary outcome
Epoch 1: Relapse Rate
Time frame: Week 32 End of Epoch 1 Treatment (EOET1)/Unscheduled relapse visit assessment (UV)/Early Termination (ET)
Relapse rate is defined as the percentage of participants who experience a worsening of functional disability. Worsening of functional disability defined as an increase of >=1 point relative to the pre- subcutaneous (SC) treatment baseline score in 2 consecutive adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability score. The INCAT disability score is an effective and responsive tool to assess clinical response to treatment in CIDP. The disability score ranges from 0 to 10 points, where 0 is normal (eg, no upper limb problems and walking not affected) and 10 is severely incapacitated (eg, inability to move either arm for any purposeful movement and restricted to wheelchair, unable to stand and walk a few steps with help).
Epoch 2: Responder Rate
Time frame: Up to 6 Months post-Epoch 1 (End of Epoch 2 Treatment [EOE2T])/Unscheduled visit assessment (UV)/Early Termination
Responder rate is defined as clinically meaningful improvement in functional ability defined as a decrease of >=1 point in the adjusted INCAT disability score at the completion of the intravenous (IV) treatment period [6 months] or at the last study visit of the IV treatment period, relative to the pre-IV treatment baseline score.
43 secondary outcomes
Epoch 1: Percentage of Participants Who Experience a Worsening of Functional Disability
Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Time to Relapse
Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 1: Change From Pre-Subcutaneous (SC) Treatment Baseline in Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS)
Time frame: Pre-subcutaneous (SC) treatment baseline, end of Epoch 1 treatment (approximately 7.3 months)
Epoch 1: Number of Participants Experiencing Any Treatment-Emergent Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs), Regardless of Causality
Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 1: Number of Participants Experiencing Causally Related Serious and/or Non-Serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs)
Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 1: Number of Participants With Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs
Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 1: Number of Treatment-emergent Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs) Associated With Infusions Regardless of Causality
Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 1: Number of Causally Related Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs) Associated With Infusions
Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 1: Number of Adverse Events (AEs) Temporally Associated With Infusions
Time frame: During an infusion or within 72 hours after completion of an infusion (up to Week 32)
Epoch 1: Number of Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs Associated With Infusions
Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 1: Number of Treatment-emergent Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) Associated With Infusions
Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 1: Number of Treatment-emergent Local Infusion Site Reactions Associated With Infusions
Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 1: Number of Infusions in Participants for Which the Infusion Rate Was Reduced And/Or the Infusion Was Interrupted or Stopped Due to Intolerability And/Or Adverse Events (AEs)
Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 1: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per Infusion
Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 1: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant
Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 1: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per 1000 Participant-year
Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 1: Rates of Causally Related Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Expressed As Number of Events Per Infusion
Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 1: Rates of Causally Related Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Expressed As Number of Events Per Participant
Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 1: Rates of Causally Related Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant-year
Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 1: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs, Expressed as Number of Events Per Infusion
Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 1: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs, Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant
Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 1: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs, Expressed as Number of Events Per 1000 Participant-Year
Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 1: Number of Participants Who Develop Binding and/or Neutralizing Antibodies to Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase (rHuPH20)
Time frame: Week 32 (EOET1)/UV/ET
Epoch 2: Number of Participants Experiencing Any Treatment-emergent Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs), Regardless of Causality
Time frame: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Epoch 2: Number of Participants Experiencing Causally Related Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs)
Time frame: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Epoch 2: Number of Participants With Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs
Time frame: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Epoch 2: Number of Treatment-emergent Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs) Associated With Infusions Regardless of Causality
Time frame: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Epoch 2: Number of Causally Related Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events (SAEs and/or AEs) Associated With Infusions
Time frame: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Epoch 2: Number of Adverse Events (AEs) Temporally Associated With Infusions
Time frame: During an infusion or within 72 hours after completion of an infusion (up to Week 32)
Epoch 2: Number of Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected ARs Associated With Infusions
Time frame: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Epoch 2: Number of Treatment-emergent Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) Associated With Infusions
Time frame: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Epoch 2: Number of Treatment-emergent Local Infusion Site Reactions Associated With Infusions
Time frame: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Epoch 2: Number of Infusions for Which the Infusion Rate Was Reduced and/or the Infusion Was Interrupted or Stopped Due to Intolerability and/or Adverse Events (AEs)
Time frame: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Epoch 2: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per Infusion
Time frame: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Epoch 2: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant
Time frame: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Epoch 2: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per 1000 Participant-year
Time frame: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Epoch 2: Rates of Causally Related Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Expressed As Number of Events Per Infusion
Time frame: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Epoch 2: Rates of Causally Related Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant
Time frame: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Epoch 2: Rates of Causally Related Systemic and Local Adverse Events (AEs), Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant-Year
Time frame: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Epoch 2: Rates of Systemic and Local Adverse Reactions (ARs) Plus Suspected Ars, Expressed as Number of Events Per Infusion
Time frame: Throughout Epoch 2, up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 May 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42578463Bus SR, Wieske L, Keddie S, van Schaik IN, Eftimov F. Subcutaneous immunoglobulin for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2026 Aug 11;8:CD014542. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014542.pub2.
- To obtain more information on the study, click here/on this linkLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Takeda provides access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) for eligible studies to aid qualified researchers in addressing legitimate scientific objectives (Takeda's data sharing commitment is available on https://clinicaltrials.takeda.com/takedas-commitment?commitment=5). These IPDs will be provided in a secure research environment following approval of a data sharing request, and under the terms of a data sharing agreement.
Related trials for Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy
Active, not recruiting
Effects of Whole-body Electrical Muscle Stimulation Exercise on Adults With Neuromuscular Disease
Neuromuscular Diseases (NMD), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Investigating Intravenous Human Normal Immune Globulin (IGIV) 10% KIg10 (QIVIGY) in Subjects With Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP)
Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy
RecruitingObservational study
Studying Nerve Function and Structure in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease, Anti-MAG Neuropathy and CIDP
Charcot-Marie-Tooth, CMT1A
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study to Assess the Long-term Safety and Efficacy of a Subcutaneous Formulation of Efgartigimod in Adults With Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP, an Autoimmune Disorder That Affects the Peripheral Nerves)
Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP)
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Efficacy and Safety Study of Nipocalimab for Adults With Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP)
Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Study Director study director
Shire
83 sites in 22 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing HYQVIA, IGIV GAMMAGARD LIQUID/KIOVIG and IGIV GAMUNEX®-C in people with Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy, run by Baxalta now part of Shire at 83 sites in 22 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 34 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 83 sites in United States, Italy, Brazil, Turkey (Türkiye), Argentina and 17 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 May 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Epoch 1: Relapse Rate (time frame: Week 32 End of Epoch 1 Treatment (EOET1)/Unscheduled relapse visit assessment (UV)/Early Termination (ET)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02549170, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 May 2023.