AzTrials
AzTrials

Heart FailureETIFICNCT02546856

Safety and Effectiveness of Drug up Titration by Nurses Specialized in Heart Failure (HF) Patients

A study testing Heart Failure (HF) nurse up-titration and Heart Failure (HF) cardiologist up-titration in people with Heart Failure, run by Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo at 1 site in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Introduction: Heart Failure (HF) generates multiple hospital admissions and mortality, which are reduced with the administration of Beta-Blocker (BB), Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor (ACEI), Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker (ARB) and Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist (MRA) drugs (Level of Evidence A). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Heart Failure
What is being tested?
Heart Failure (HF) nurse up-titration and Heart Failure (HF) cardiologist up-titration
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
320 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
Mar 2015to 1 Apr 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient with "de novo" heart Failure and LVEF <= 40% admitted in hospital, without contraindications for BB prescription with cardiologist up-titration prescription and without having achieved BB target dose previous discharge and signing informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Contraindications for BB.
  • Living in a nursing home.
  • Life expectancy < 6 months.
  • Unable to self-care or mental disease without caregiver.
  • Unable to weight
  • Without phone
  • Unable to go to clinic visit.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Spain1 site
  • Hospital de usansolo-Galdakao

    Usansolo, Bizkaia, 48960

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Introduction: Heart Failure (HF) generates multiple hospital admissions and mortality, which are reduced with the administration of Beta-Blocker (BB), Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor (ACEI), Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker (ARB) and Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist (MRA) drugs (Level of Evidence A). The effect is dose-dependent. Nevertheless, dosages are suboptimal. European Guidelines 2012 recommend close monitoring and up-titration of drugs by HF nurses. Trials are needed to evaluate their effectiveness and safety. Objective: To compare doses achieved by patients of BB, ACEI, ARB II and MRA in 4 months ( % relative to target doses) in the intervention group (HF nurse) and in the control group ( cardiologist), adverse events, Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF), New York Heart Association (NYHA), 6 min. walking test, quality of life, Nt-proBNP, readmissions and mortality. Hypothesis: Non-inferiority. Design: Multicenter randomized controlled trial. New ("de novo") HF patients with LVEF ≤ 40%, NYHA II-III, without contraindications to BB of 17 Spanish hospitals will be included. Intervention: The cardiologist prescribes drugs and, driven by protocol, the HF nurse implements the up-titration. In the control group doses are decided by the cardiologist clinical support and education being provided by nurses. Variables: age, sex, education, psycho-social level, Cardio Vascular Risk Factors (CVRF), NYHA, LVEF, ischemic cardiopathy., N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (Nt-proBNP), 6min. walking test, Creatinine/Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR), Potassium (K), haemoglobin, Blood Pressure (BP), Heart Rate (HR), mg./drug, European Heart Failure Self-Care Behaviour Scale (EHFScBS), Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire (MLHFQ), European Quality of life Scale (EQ-5D). Expected Results: If our hypothesis were confirmed, evidence would be provided on the effectiveness of this healthcare management, that could be economically evaluated in future studies. A qualitative study also will be undertaken to explore barriers and facilitators to implementation

Read the detailed description

No apply

Conditions
Heart Failure
Being tested
Heart Failure (HF) nurse up-titration, Heart Failure (HF) cardiologist up-titration
Keywords
Up-titration, Nursing or Nurse, Heart Failure
Medical subject headings
Heart Failure

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Heart Failure (HF) nurse up-titrationOther

    Up-titration of Beta-Blocker (BB), Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor (ACEI), Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker (ARB) and Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist (MRA) in Heart Failure "De Novo" patients with Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)≤ 40%, following a protocol based on 2012 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Heart Failure (HF) guidelines with cardiologist prescription and support.

  • Heart Failure (HF) cardiologist up-titrationOther

    Up-titration of Beta-Blocker (BB), Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor (ACEI), Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker (ARB) and Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist (MRA) in Heart Failure "De Novo" patients with Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)≤ 40%, following a protocol based on 2012 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Heart Failure (HF) guidelines. Drugs are prescribed and titrated by the cardiologist.

Study groups in NCT02546856
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Heart Failure (HF) cardiologist up-titrationActive comparatorActive Comparator:Cardiologist decides dosage with nursing clinical and educational support.
Receives: Other: Heart Failure (HF) cardiologist up-titration
HF nurse up-titrationExperimentalIntervention: The cardiologist prescribes drugs and, driven by protocol, the HF nurse implements the up-titration.
Receives: Other: Heart Failure (HF) nurse up-titration

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. BB % Relative Dose (Mean) With Regard to Target Dose

    BB mean Relative dose is the mean dose of betablockers achieved 4 months after starting titration, relative to target dose ( %) , which is the target dose of european heart failure guidelines for BB.

    Measured: 4 months

Secondary outcomes (20)
  1. Number of Participants With Worsening Renal Function (From Baseline to 4th Month)

    Number of participants with worsening renal function during the titration process (from baseline to 4 month) that could be associated to the titration process (Creatinine increase >50% baseline creatinine or creatinine>3mg/dl, or Estimated Glomerular Filtration<25 ml/min/1.73 m2)

    Measured: 4 months

  2. Number of Participants With Potassium (K) ≥5.5 Meq/l (From Baseline to 4 Month)

    Number of participants with Potassium≥ 5.5 meq/l during the titration process (from baseline to 4 month) that could be associated to this titration process

    Measured: 4 months

  3. Number of Participants With Symptomatic Hypotension (From Baseline to 4 Month)

    Description: Number of participants with symptomatic hypotension during the titration process (from baseline to 4 month) that could be associated to this titration process. Symptomatic hypotension defined as symptoms such as dizziness or light headedness, associated to hypotension

    Measured: 4 months

  4. Number of Participants With Heart Rate (HR) < 50 Beats Per Minute (From Baseline to 4 Month)

    Number of participants with Heart Rate (HR) < 50 beats per minute during the titration process (from baseline to 4 month) , which could be associated to the titration process. (with or without symptoms)

    Measured: 4 months

  5. Number of Patients With Atrio Ventricular (AV) Block Due to Titration

    Number of patients with AV Block during the titration process, associated to the BB titration

    Measured: 4 months

  6. Number of Patients With Worsening of Heart Failure Signs and Symptoms

    Number of patients with worsening of heart failure signs and symptoms during the titration process ( from baseline to 4 month) which could be associated to the titration process.

    Measured: 4 months

  7. Number of Patients With Admissions Due to Titration

    Number of patients with admissions due to titration ( not due to other causes)

    Measured: 4 months

  8. Number of Patients: Mortality Due to Titration

    Number of patients: Mortality due to titration ( not due to other causes)

    Measured: 4 months

  9. Number of Paticipants With Drug Stop (Some Titration Drug Withdrawal Due to Intolerance, no Need or Change to Other Treatment)

    number of paticipants with drug Stop ( withdrawal) that occur during the titration process that could be due to an adverse event. ( it can be not only due to an adverse event but because there is no need of this drug or its substitution for another kind of drug)

    Measured: 4 months

  10. Change in % Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

    Change in % Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (difference of change from baseline to 6 months between groups) Ejection fraction is a measurement of the percentage of blood leaving the heart each time it contracts.

    Measured: 6 months

  11. N-terminal Pro-B Type Natriuretic Peptide Improvement (Nt-proBNP)

    Nt-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide) Improvement (Decrease) difference of change from baseline to 6 months between groups, mean (SD)

    Measured: 6 months

  12. 6 Minute Walking Test

    6 minute walking test improvement ( change) meters.Improvement (difference of change from baseline to 6 months between groups Six minute walking test. Measurement of exercise capacity is an integral element in assessment of patients with cardiopulmonary disease. It provides information regarding functional capacity, response to therapy and prognosis across a range of chronic cardiopulmonary conditions. The six-minute walk test (6MWT) measures the distance (meters) an individual is able to walk over a total of six minutes on a hard, flat surface. The goal is for the individual to walk as far as possible in six minutes. The individual is allowed to self-pace and rest as needed as they traverse back and forth along a marked walkway.

    Measured: 6 months

  13. Number of Participants n(%) in New York Heart Association Functional Classification I,II,III,IV

    Number of participants class I-IV New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification, based on severity of symptoms and physical activity:

    NYHA I (better): No limitation of physical activity; NYHA II: Slight limitation of ordinary physical activity, breathlessness; NYHA III: marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest, but less than ordinary activity results in undue breathlessness, fatigue or palpitations; NYHA IV ( worse): unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort.Symptoms at rest can be present. If any physical activity is undertaken discomfort is increased.

    Measured: 6 months

  14. Quality of Life: MLWHFQ

    Quality of Life, measured by Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Improvement (change) from baseline to 6 months.

    Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHFQ). The content of this questionnaire was selected to be representative of the ways heart failure and treatments can affect the key physical, emotional, social and mental dimensions of quality of life of patients with heart failure. It consist of 21-items with score 0-5. Final evaluation moves from 0 (none) to 105 (very much); a lower score means better quality of life.

    Measured: 6 months

  15. European Quality of Life Scale: EuroQol- 5 Dimension Index

    European Quality of Life Scale: EuroQol- 5 Dimension index (Range: 1 full health-0 death). It measures health status self-reported by the patient. It has 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is divided into three levels: 1 no problem; 2 some or moderate problems; 3 extreme problems. The EuroQol Research Foundation converts this information into a single summary index, by applying a formula that attaches specific country values (called weights) to each of the levels in each dimension. The index is calculated by subtracting the mentioned weights from 1, the value for full health.

    We measured the EuroQol-5D index improvement (change) from baseline to 6 months.

    More information in: EQ-5D-3L-User-Guide_version-6.0 (1).pdf

    Measured: 6 months

  16. Number of Patients With Admissions Due to Heart Failure (HF)

    Number of patients with hospital admissions due to Heart Failure. From Baseline to 6 months

    Measured: 6 months

  17. Number of Patients With Deaths

    Number of Patients with deaths due to Cardiovascular and non cardiovascular causes

    Measured: 6 months

  18. ACEI % Relative Dose (Mean) With Regard to Target Dose

    ACEI mean Relative dose is the mean dose of ACEI achieved 4 months after starting titration, relative to target dose (%) described in European guidelines

    Measured: 4 Months

  19. ARB % Relative Dose (Mean) With Regard to Target Dose

    ARB, angiotensin II receptor blockers, mean relative dose ( % to target dose). Target dose is described in European guidelines.

    Measured at 4 months after starting titration.

    Measured: 4 months

  20. MRA % Relative Dose (Mean) With Regard to Target Dose

    MRA % relative dose (mean) is the mean dose achieved 4 months after starting titration with regard to target dose (%) described in european guidelines

    Measured: 4 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Sep 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2015
  3. Primary completionOct 2018
  4. Study completion1 Apr 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
320 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02546856
Sponsor's protocol ID
PI14/01208
Acronym
ETIFIC
Status last verified
Nov 2020
First submitted
18 May 2015
Last updated
16 Dec 2020
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Oyanguren J, Garcia-Garrido L, Nebot Margalef M, Lekuona I, Comin-Colet J, Manito N, Roure J, Ruiz Rodriguez P, Enjuanes C, Latorre P, Torcal Laguna J, Garcia-Gutierrez S; ETIFIC7 research group. Design of a multicentre randomized controlled trial to assess the safety and efficacy of dose titration by specialized nurses in patients with heart failure. ETIFIC study protocol. ESC Heart Fail. 2017 Nov;4(4):507-519. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12152. Epub 2017 Apr 3.

    PubMed 29154427
  • Oyanguren J, Garcia-Garrido L, Nebot-Margalef M, Latorre-Garcia P, Torcal-Laguna J, Comin-Colet J, Roure J, Gonzalez-Costello J, Manito N, Garcia-Pinilla JM, Sanchez-Paule Y, Varela-Roman A, Moure M, Segovia-Cubero J, Soria T, Arana-Arri E, Lekuona I; Steering Committee on behalf of the ETIFIC research team group. Noninferiority of heart failure nurse titration versus heart failure cardiologist titration. ETIFIC multicenter randomized trial. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2021 Jun;74(6):533-543. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2020.04.016. Epub 2020 Jun 24. English, Spanish.

    PubMed 32591295
  • Oyanguren J, Diaz-Molina B, Lekuona I, Gonzalez-Costello J, Lopez-Fernandez S, Garcia-Pinilla JM, Garcia-Garrido L, Lopez-Moyano G, Manito N, Cobo-Marcos M, Nebot-Margalef M, Latorre-Garcia P, Arana-Arri E, Perez-Fernandez S, Torcal-Laguna J; ETIFIC research team group. Gender differences in drug titration among heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction in the ETIFIC trial. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2022 Aug;75(8):636-648. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2021.11.002. Epub 2021 Dec 10. English, Spanish.

    PubMed 34903479

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Heart Failure (HF) nurse up-titration and Heart Failure (HF) cardiologist up-titration in people with Heart Failure, run by Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Dec 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Nov 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

BB % Relative Dose (Mean) With Regard to Target Dose (time frame: 4 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02546856, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Dec 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in