AzTrials
AzTrials

Ulcerative ColitisPhase 3NCT02522780

Mesalamine 2 g Sachet for the Maintenance of Clinical and Endoscopic Remission in Ulcerative Colitis (UC)

A Phase 3 study testing Mesalamine in people with Ulcerative Colitis, run by Ferring Pharmaceuticals at 96 sites in 11 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this trial was to investigate the safety and efficacy of mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet) once a day (QD) for maintenance of clinical and endoscopic remission in subjects with UC. The duration of treatment for each subject was 6 months. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Ulcerative Colitis
What is being tested?
Mesalamine
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
276 participants
Where
96 sitesin 11 countries
Study dates
1 Feb 2016to 19 Sep 2018
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female subjects aged 18 to 75 years, with Ulcerative Colitis in remission

Who cannot join

  • Evidence of other forms of inflammatory bowel disease
  • Infectious disease (including human immunodeficiency virus [HIV], hepatitis B virus [HBV], or hepatitis C virus [HCV])
  • Disease limited to proctitis <15 cm
  • Short bowel syndrome
  • Prior colon resection surgery
  • History of severe/fulminant UC
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Intolerant or allergic to aspirin or salicylate derivatives
  • Use of rectal formulations (5-aminosalicylic acid [5-ASA], steroids) within ≤7 days
  • Women who are pregnant or nursing
  • History of known malignancy
  • History of bleeding disorders, active gastric or active duodenal ulcers, autoimmune diseases, or mental/ emotional disorders, that would interfere with their participation in the trial

Trial locations and contacts

96 sites in 11 countries.

96 sites in 11 countries

Ukraine20 sites
  • Regional Municipal Institution Chernivtsi Regional Clinical Hospital

    Chernivtsi

  • Municipal Institution Dnipropetrovsk Regional Clinical Hospital n.a. I.I. Mechnykov

    Dnipropetrovsk

  • Municipal Healthcare Institution Kharkiv City Clinical Hospital #2

    Kharkiv

  • SI National Institute of Therapy n.a. L.T. Mala of National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine

    Kharkiv

  • Municipal Intitution "Kherson City Clinical Hospital n.a. A. and O. Tropinykh"

    Kherson

  • Private Enterprise Private Manufactire Company "Acinus"

    Kirovohrad

  • Kremenchuk city Hospital # n.a O.T.Bohaievskyi

    Kremenchuk

  • Kyiv Municipal Clinical Hospital #18

    Kyiv, Kyïv

  • Medical Center LLC Ukrainian German Antiulcer Gastroenterology Center BIK Kyiv

    Kyiv, Kyïv

  • Kyiv City Clinical Hospital #8

    Kyiv

  • Kyiv Municipal Clinical Hospital #18

    Kyiv

  • Medical Center Universal Clinic Oberih of LLC Kapytal

    Kyiv

  • Municipal City Clinical emergency Hospital

    Lviv

  • Municipal Institution Odesa Regional Clinical Hospital

    Odesa

  • Medical Clinical Research Center of Medical Center LLC Health Clinic

    Vinnytsia

  • Small Business Private Enterprise Medical Center "Pulse"

    Vinnytsia

  • Vinnytsia Regional Clinical Hospital Hospital n.a. M.I. Pyrohov

    Vinnytsia

  • Municipal Institution 6th City Clinical Hospital of Zaporizhzhia City Council

    Zaporizhzhya

  • Municipal Institution Zaporizhzhia Regional Clinical Hospital of Zaporizhzhia Regional Council

    Zaporizhzhya

  • Medical Centre of PE First Private Clinic

    Zhytomyr

Other trials in Ukraine

United States18 sites
  • New River Valley Research Institute

    Christiansburg, Virginia

  • Cumberland Research Associates, LLC

    Fayetteville, North Carolina

  • Associates in Gastroenterology, PLC

    Hermitage, Tennessee

  • BI Research Center

    Houston, Texas

  • Biopharma Informatic Inc.

    Houston, Texas

  • Clinical Trials of SWLA, LLC

    Lake Charles, Louisiana

  • Preferred Research Partners

    Little Rock, Arkansas

  • Research Associates of South Florida, LLC

    Miami, Florida

  • United Research Institute

    Murrieta, California

  • Quality Medical Research, PLLC

    Nashville, Tennessee

  • Digestive & Liver Disease Specialists

    Norfolk, Virginia

  • Advanced Research Institute

    Ogden, Utah

  • IMIC

    Palmetto Bay, Florida

  • Digestive Health Center

    Pasadena, Texas

  • Medical Research Center of Florida

    Pembroke Pines, Florida

  • Lenus Research and Medical Group

    Sweetwater, Florida

  • DM Clinical Research

    Tomball, Texas

  • Wilmington Gastroenterology Associates

    Wilmington, North Carolina

Other trials in United States

Russia14 sites
  • Regional Clinical Hospital

    Krasnoyarsk

  • City Clinical Hospital # 51

    Moscow

  • Nizhegorodskaya Regional Clinical Hospital n.a. Semashko

    Nizhny Novgorod

  • Novosibirsk State Medical University

    Novosibirsk

  • Research Institute of Physiology of Sibirian Branch the RAMS

    Novosibirsk

  • Omsk State Medical Academy

    Omsk

  • Rostov State Medical University

    Rostov-on-Don

  • Ryazan Regional Clinical Hospital

    Ryazan

  • State Budget Institution of Ryazan region" Regional Clinical Hospital"

    Ryazan

  • City Hospital #31

    Saint Petersburg

  • City Polyclinic #38

    Saint Petersburg

  • Russian Medical Military Academy n.a. S.M. Kirov

    Saint Petersburg

  • Medical Company "Hepatolog", LLC

    Samara

  • Stavropol State Medical Academy

    Stavropol

Other trials in Russia

Poland12 sites
  • Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny w Bialymstoku

    Bialystok, Podlaskie Voivodeship

  • Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej Intermed

    Częstochowa

  • Centrum Badan Klinicznych PI-House sp. z o.o.

    Gdansk, Pomeranian Voivodeship

  • Economicus - NZOZ ALL-MEDICUS

    Katowice

  • Investigational site

    Ksawerów

  • Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej CENTRUM MEDYCZNE Szpital Swietej Rodziny

    Lodz

  • SPZOZ Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny nr 1 im. Norberta Barlickiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego w Lodzi

    Lodz

  • Osrodek Medycyny Rodzinnej Sp. z o.o.

    Sobótka, Lower Silesian Voivodeship

  • Endoskopia Sp. z o.o.

    Sopot

  • Zespół Przychodni Specjalistycznych PRIMA Sp. z o.o.

    Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship

  • Instytut Pomnik Centrum Zdrowia Dziecka

    Warsaw

  • Lexmedica

    Wroclaw, Lower Silesian Voivodeship

Other trials in Poland

Bulgaria9 sites
  • Multiprofile Hospital For Active Treatment Avis Medica

    Pleven

  • University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment Kaspela

    Plovdiv

  • Medical Center Excelsior OOD

    Sevlievo

  • Medical Center-1-Sevlievo EOOD

    Sevlievo

  • City Clinic University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment EOOD

    Sofia

  • Medical Center Asklepion - Humane Medicine Research EOOD

    Sofia

  • University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment Sv Ivan Rilski EAD

    Sofia

  • University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment Tsaritsa Yoanna - ISUL EAD

    Sofia

  • Diagnostic Consultative Centre Mladost M OOD

    Varna

Other trials in Bulgaria

Hungary7 sites
  • Magyar Honvédség Egészségügyi Központ

    Budapest

  • Pannónia Magánorvosi Centrum Kft

    Budapest

  • Semmelweis Egyetem Institute

    Budapest

  • Vasútegészségügyi Nonprofit Kiemelten Közhasznú Kft. Debreceni Egészségügyi Központja

    Debrecen

  • ENDOMEDIX Kft.

    Miskolc

  • Karolina Korhaz Rendelointezet

    Mosonmagyaróvár

  • Clinfan Kft.

    Szekszárd

Other trials in Hungary

Latvia5 sites
  • Polana-D, LTD

    Daugavpils

  • Digestive Diseases Centre Gastro

    Riga

  • Latvian Maritime Medicine Centre

    Riga

  • Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital

    Riga

  • Riga East Clinical University Hospital

    Riga

Other trials in Latvia

Mexico3 sites
  • ICARO Investigaciones en Medicina, S.A de C.V

    Chihuahua City

  • Maria Auxiliadora Hospital

    Guadalajara

  • Investigación Biomédica para el Desarrollo de Fármacos, S.A. de C.V.

    Zapopan

Other trials in Mexico

Serbia3 sites
  • Clinical Hospital Centar Zvezdara

    Belgrade

  • Clinical Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa

    Belgrade

  • Health Center Valjevo

    Valjevo

Other trials in Serbia

Switzerland3 sites
  • Inselspital Bern

    Bern

  • Investigational site

    Bern

  • Universitätsspital Zürich

    Zurich

Other trials in Switzerland

Canada2 sites
  • Topstone Research Institute

    Ottawa, Ontario

  • Toronto Digestive Disease Associates Inc

    Toronto, Vaughan

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Mesalamine 2 g Extended Release Granules (Sachet) for Maintenance of Clinical and Endoscopic Remission in Ulcerative Colitis

The purpose of this trial was to investigate the safety and efficacy of mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet) once a day (QD) for maintenance of clinical and endoscopic remission in subjects with UC. The duration of treatment for each subject was 6 months.

Being tested
Mesalamine, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Colitis, Ulcerative

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MesalamineDrug

    Also called Mesalazine, Pentasa

    Pharmaceutical form: Granules in sachet; Route of administration: Oral use

  • PlaceboDrug

    Pharmaceutical form: Granules in sachet; Route of administration: Oral use

Study groups in NCT02522780
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
MesalamineExperimentalMesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally once daily (QD) for 6 months.
Receives: Drug: Mesalamine
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorPlacebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of Subjects With Remission at Month 6

    The proportion of subjects with remission was defined by Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score: 0 for rectal bleeding; 0 or 1 for stool frequency; 0 or 1 for endoscopic score. The Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score ranged between 0 (normal) to 9 (severe disease), higher scores indicating greater disease severity. The score included clinical response component to assess subject's symptoms and endoscopic response component to assess objective evidence of inflammation. Clinical response component had two subscales: stool frequency ranging from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (>=5 stools more than normal) and rectal bleeding ranging from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes). The Endoscopic response component had one subscale: flexible sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

    Measured: Month 6

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Proportion of Subjects in Clinical Remission at Month 2, 4, and 6

    The proportion of subjects in clinical remission was defined as a score of 0 for rectal bleeding and 0 or 1 for stool frequency based on clinical response score component of the Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score. Clinical response score component had two subscales to assess subject's symptoms: rectal bleeding ranging from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes) and stool frequency ranging from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (>=5 stools more than normal). The scores of clinical response component ranged from 0 (normal) to 6 (severe disease), higher scores indicating greater disease severity. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

    Measured: Month 2, 4, and 6

  2. Time to Relapse

    Time to relapse was defined as the number of days from randomization to the day of withdrawal due to escalation of therapy. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

    Measured: Time from randomization to the day of withdrawal due to escalation of therapy (up to 6 months)

  3. Proportion of Subjects With an Increase From Baseline in the Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score by 2 or More Points in at Least 1 Component or by 1 or More Points in at Least 2 Components at Month 6

    The proportion of subjects with an increase from baseline in the Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score by 2 or more points in at least 1 component, or by 1 or more points in at least 2 components were reported. The Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score ranged between 0 (normal) to 9 (severe disease), higher scores indicating greater disease severity. The score included clinical response component to assess subject's symptoms and endoscopic response component to assess objective evidence of inflammation. Clinical Response component had two subscales: stool frequency ranging from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (>=5 stools more than normal) and rectal bleeding ranging from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes). The Endoscopic Response component had one subscale: flexible sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

    Measured: Month 6

  4. Change From Baseline in Serum C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6

    The adjusted mean change from baseline in serum CRP levels at Month 2, 4, and 6 were reported. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 2, 4, and 6

  5. Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6

    The adjusted mean change from baseline in fecal calprotectin levels at Month 2, 4, and 6 were reported. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 2, 4, and 6

  6. Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Scores at Months 2, 4, and 6

    The IBDQ is an instrument used to assess quality of life in adult subjects with ulcerative colitis. It includes 32 questions on 4 domains of Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQOL): Bowel Systems (10 items), Emotional Function (12 items), Social Function (5 items), and Systemic Function (5 items). Subjects were asked to recall symptoms and quality of life from the last 2 weeks and rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale (1=worst to 7=best). The total IBDQ was computed as the sum of the responses to the individual IBDQ questions. The total score can range between 32 to 224 with higher scores indicating a better HRQOL. The adjusted mean change from baseline at Month 2, 4, and 6 for the IBDQ total scores were reported. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 2, 4, and 6

  7. Number of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject participating in a clinical trial. Any AEs includes serious as well as non-serious AEs. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, was life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or was an important medical event. Any AE which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (investigational medicinal product [IMP] intake) to the end of treatment visit (Month 6) was considered treatment-emergent. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

    Measured: Up to Month 6

  8. Severity of Adverse Events

    The number of subjects with intensity of AEs (classified as mild, moderate or severe) were presented. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

    Measured: Up to Month 6

  9. Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology

    Proportion of subjects with markedly abnormal changes from baseline in hematology values are presented. Criteria for markedly abnormal laboratory (Hematology): Basophils/Leukocytes: >=5%, Eosinophils/Leukocytes: >=10%, Erythrocytes: <=3.5*10^6/μL, Hematocrit: <=0.32%; >=0.56%, Hemoglobin: <=11.5 g/dL, Leukocytes: <=2.8*10^3/μL; >=16.0*10^3/μL, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes: <=10%; >=80%, Monocytes/Leukocytes: >=20%, Neutrophils/Leukocytes: <=15%; >=90%, Platelets: <=75*10^3/μL; >=700*10^3/μL. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 6

  10. Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Coagulation

    Proportion of subjects with markedly abnormal changes from baseline in coagulation values are presented. Criteria for markedly abnormal laboratory (coagulation): Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT): >70 seconds (sec), Prothrombin International Normalized Ratio (INR): <0.8; >1.1. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 6

  11. Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry

    Proportion of subjects with markedly abnormal changes from baseline in serum chemistry values are presented. Criteria for markedly abnormal laboratory (serum chemistry): Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT): >3*upper limit of normal (ULN), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP): >3*ULN and 25% increase (inc) from baseline (BL), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST): >3* ULN, Bilirubin: >=1.5* ULN, Blood Urea Nitrogen: >=10.7 mg/dL, Calcium: <=1.8 mg/dL; >=3.9 mg/dL, Chloride: <=90 mmol/L; >=115 mmol/L, Creatinine: >=177 mg/dL, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase: >3*ULN, Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR): <30 mL/min, Glucose: <=2.8 mg/dL; >=10 mg/dL, Potassium: <=3.0 mmol/L; >=5.8 mmol/L, Sodium: <=130 mmol/L; >=155 mmol/L. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 6

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Aug 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Feb 2016
  3. Primary completion19 Sep 2018
  4. Study completion19 Sep 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
276 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02522780
Sponsor's protocol ID
000175
Other IDs
2015-002558-11, 2015
Status last verified
Sep 2019
First submitted
12 Aug 2015
Last updated
8 Nov 2021
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Mesalamine in people with Ulcerative Colitis, run by Ferring Pharmaceuticals at 96 sites in 11 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 96 sites in Ukraine, United States, Russia, Poland, Bulgaria and 6 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Sep 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of Subjects With Remission at Month 6 (time frame: Month 6). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Nov 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in