AzTrials
AzTrials

MelanomaNCT02520622

Digital vs. Printed Photographs: Impact on Skin Self-Examinations

A study testing Digital photographs loaded onto a mobile device, Skin exam reminders and Social support network in people with Melanoma, run by University of Pennsylvania at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary aim is to determine the impact of using digital photographs on a mobile device versus printed photographs on skin self-examination rates. The ease-of-use and overall satisfaction with the two exam modalities will be evaluated. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Melanoma
What is being tested?
Digital photographs loaded onto a mobile device, Skin exam reminders and Social support network
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
69 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
16 Feb 2015to 25 Jan 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients presenting to the Penn Dermatology Pigmented Lesion Clinic who have a mobile device for personal use that either:
  • (1) already have total body photography images, have a compact disc (CD) of digital versions of these images, and who do NOT already conduct proper monthly skin exams at home, and
  • (2) patients that are having new images taken

Who cannot join

  • Patients that are children or adolescents
  • Patients that are court-ordered to attend residential alcohol or other drug treatment facilities and therefore considered prisoners
  • Patients that are incompetent to provide informed consent and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) authorization

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Pennsylvania

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of the Impact of Using Digital Photographs on a Mobile Device Versus Printed Photographs on Patient Conducted Skin Exams

The primary aim is to determine the impact of using digital photographs on a mobile device versus printed photographs on skin self-examination rates. The ease-of-use and overall satisfaction with the two exam modalities will be evaluated. Secondarily, the impact on melanoma thickness at detection, melanoma detection, biopsy, and office visit rates will be evaluated. The study involves patients in the Pigmented Lesion Clinic that have received total body photography for skin monitoring.

Conditions
Melanoma
Being tested
Digital photographs loaded onto a mobile device, Skin exam reminders, Social support network
Medical subject headings
Melanoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Digital photographs loaded onto a mobile deviceBehavioural

  • Skin exam remindersBehavioural

  • Social support networkBehavioural

Study groups in NCT02520622
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ControlExperimentalPatients use digital photographs loaded onto a mobile device
Receives: Behavioral: Digital photographs loaded onto a mobile device
RemindersExperimentalPatients use digital photographs loaded onto a mobile device and receive skin exam reminders
Receives: Behavioral: Digital photographs loaded onto a mobile device; Behavioral: Skin exam reminders
Social SupportExperimentalPatients use digital photographs loaded onto a mobile device and a social support network
Receives: Behavioral: Digital photographs loaded onto a mobile device; Behavioral: Social support network
CombinedExperimentalPatients use digital photographs loaded onto a mobile device and a social support network and receive skin exam reminders
Receives: Behavioral: Digital photographs loaded onto a mobile device; Behavioral: Skin exam reminders; Behavioral: Social support network

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Skin self-examination rates

    Evaluate if printed photographs alone versus skin self-examinations supplemented with digital photos on a mobile device, or digital photos with reminders, social support networks, or both, lead to improved self-examination rates. This outcome is assessed by survey, before and after the intervention.

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Features important to a skin self-examination tool

    Identify the features of digital or printed photograph use that are important to patients to have as part of a successful adjunct skin self-examination tool. This outcome is measured via survey after the intervention where participants rank on a Likert scale a series of features from critical to not important.

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Melanoma thickness at detection

    Determine if using printed photographs alone versus skin self-examinations supplemented with digital photos on a mobile device leads to differing melanoma thickness upon detection. This outcome will be assessed at the group level using descriptive statistics to calculate a mean thickness between the two groups where a Student's t-test will be used to assess significance.

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Office visit rates

    Determine if using printed photographs alone versus skin self-examinations supplemented with digital photos on a mobile device leads to differing office visit rates. This outcome will be assessed at the group level where the number of office visits over the course of the study will be compared for each group using a proportion's test or a chi-squared association test to assess if the rates between the two groups differ significantly.

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Biopsy rates

    Determine if using printed photographs alone versus skin self-examinations supplemented with digital photos on a mobile device leads to differing biopsy rates. This outcome will be assessed at the group level where the number of biopsies over the course of the study will be compared for each group using a proportion's test or a chi-squared association test to assess if the rates between the two groups differ significantly.

    Measured: 6 months

  5. Melanoma detection rates

    Determine if using printed photographs alone versus skin self-examinations supplemented with digital photos on a mobile device leads to differing melanoma detection rates. This outcome will be assessed at the group level where the number of new melanomas detected over the course of the study will be compared for each group using a proportion's test or a chi-squared association test to assess if the rates between the two groups differ significantly.

    Measured: 6 months

  6. Study/technology implementation

    Evaluate the study/technology implementation process using the implementation sciences RE-AIM framework to categorize and describe as follows:

    Reach

    1. Number of skin exams
    2. Number of first time skin exams
    3. Percent of patients offered/recommended full body photography

    Effectiveness a. (Please see the primary outcome variables)

    Adoption

    1. Percent opting for total body photography of whom it is offered/recommended

    Implementation

    1. Number and extent of changes to patient surveys
    2. Number and extent of changes to educational/training materials
    3. Number and percent of patients expressing interest in, or inquiring about the study
    4. Time spent educating patients on how to conduct a skin self-examination
    5. Time spent educating clinicians on the study

    Maintenance

    1. Number and percent of repeat skin exams
    2. Number and percent of patients abandoning a particular modality
    3. Changes in RE-AIM measurements from one month to the next

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Aug 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start16 Feb 2015
  3. Primary completion25 Jan 2017
  4. Study completion25 Jan 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
69 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02520622
Sponsor's protocol ID
821426
Status last verified
May 2017
First submitted
3 Aug 2015
Last updated
2 May 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Marek AJ, Chu EY, Ming ME, Khan ZA, Kovarik CL. Piloting the Use of Smartphones, Reminders, and Accountability Partners to Promote Skin Self-Examinations in Patients with Total Body Photography: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018 Oct;19(5):779-785. doi: 10.1007/s40257-018-0372-7.

    PubMed 30062632

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Digital photographs loaded onto a mobile device, Skin exam reminders and Social support network in people with Melanoma, run by University of Pennsylvania at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Skin self-examination rates (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02520622, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 May 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in