AzTrials
AzTrials

Overactive BladderNCT02502838

The Effect of an Additional Stress Incontinence Procedure on Overactive Bladder During Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair

An observational study of Overactive Bladder and Pelvic Organ Prolapse, run by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition in women. Approximately 20% of women undergo surgical correction for POP in their lifetime. Overactive bladder symptoms (OAB) are often associated with POP in 25-69% of patients and POP has been shown to be an independent risk factor for OAB. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 22 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Overactive Bladder, Pelvic Organ Prolapse
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
May 2015to 30 Jun 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 22 years and older
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients who present to urogynecologist for surgical management

Who may be able to join

  • Women >21 years old with stage 2 or greater pelvic organ prolapse who plan to undergo anterior and/or apical prolapse repair
  • Women who respond affirmatively to questions 15 and 16 on the PFDI-20 questionnaire
  • Women with negative urine culture pre-operatively
  • Women able to provide informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Women with pelvic organ prolapse that respond negatively to questions 15 and 16 on the PFDI-20 questionnaire
  • Women with previous urogynecologic surgery including prior hysterectomy with any type of apical support known to the patient (history of hysterectomy alone may be included)
  • Women who report UTI within 1 month of recruitment (with confirmation of positive culture)
  • Women with history of diagnosis of interstitial cystitis or any treatment for interstitial cystitis
  • Women who undergo TVT-O (transobturator) and not retropubic TVT
  • Women who undergo posterior compartment repair only
  • Women who are pregnant and up to 6 weeks postpartum
  • Women who undergo prolapse repair with transvaginal mesh

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Mount Sinai Hospital

    New York, New York, 10029

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: The Effect of an Additional TVT on OAB Symptoms in Surgical Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition in women. Approximately 20% of women undergo surgical correction for POP in their lifetime. Overactive bladder symptoms (OAB) are often associated with POP in 25-69% of patients and POP has been shown to be an independent risk factor for OAB. There is scientific evidence that surgical repair of POP reduces or eliminates OAB in >85%. In addition, stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is also often associated with POP, either clinically evident or as a potential post-operative complication.

The clinical decision as to include a surgical technique to treat SUI when repairing POP surgically is still a matter of controversy. Most surgeons at the institution will include an extra procedure, specifically a retropubic sling, if SUI is clinically evident. Some will not include it unless there is urodynamic or clinical evidence of potential SUI post-operatively. Finally, some will include it regardless of clinical or urodynamic findings based on the apparent high incidence of such SUI after prolapse repair. The Tension-Free-Vaginal Tape (TVT) has been observed to reduce OAB as well as produce de-novo OAB symptoms, so the effect of TVT on OAB is still unclear.

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of additional TVT surgery on OAB symptoms in patients undergoing POP repair. It is hoped that such data will better determine the effect of either surgical intervention strategy on OAB symptoms. This is a prospective cohort study comparing patients with OAB that undergo surgical repair of their prolapse with or without additional TVT surgery. The outcomes will be measured using pre- and post-operative validated questionnaires (PFDI-20, OAB-q short form).

Read the detailed description

Hypothesis: Based on the limited data available, the investigators expect to find that there will be less improvement in OAB symptoms in women undergoing POP surgery with TVT than those undergoing POP surgery alone.

Primary Aim: To determine what effect the addition of a TVT will have on OAB symptoms in women undergoing surgical repair of pelvic organ prolapse using validated questionnaires.

Secondary Aims: To compare postoperative complications between those undergoing prolapse surgery alone and those undergoing prolapse surgery and TVT. Lastly the investigators would like to evaluate comorbidities and potential association to the degree of OAB symptoms

Methods:

Potential eligible subjects will be recruited using information provided by urogynecology staff and by reviewing the upcoming OR schedule. After subjects have been identified, the surgeon will be contacted to confirm whether or not their patient can be contacted by the research team. Only after permission has been communicated from the surgeon to the research team will the team approach the patient about potential participation.

After the patient is consented to participate she will be asked to fill out a PFDI-20 questionnaire. This is a validated questionnaire divided into 3 sections relating to prolapse symptoms, bowel symptoms and urinary symptoms, respectively. It is based on a 5 point scale- 0 for no, and then in terms of how bothersome symptoms are 2- not at all, 3- somewhat, 4- moderately, 5- quite a bit. A higher score indicates greater degree of bother. Focus will be on the UDI-6 section, pertaining to urinary symptoms.

The questions that will determine inclusion or exclusion of the patients are questions 15 and 16: "Do you usually experience frequent urination" and "Do you usually experience urine leakage associated with a feeling of urgency; that is, a strong sensation of needing to go to the bathroom?" Those who respond negatively to these questions will be excluded and those who respond affirmatively to both questions will be included.

The patients with OAB symptoms will be asked to fill out the OAB-q short form validated questionnaire which includes a 6-item symptoms bother scale (OAB-q ss) and a 13-item HRQL scale (OAB-q HRQL). This should be completed pre-operatively and then again 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months post-operatively.

Interventions: No interventions will be made. This is an observational study.

Outcomes Primary: The primary outcome will be measured using pre- and post-operative validated questionnaires (PFDI-20, OAB-q short form). The primary study endpoint will be the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Symptom Severity (OAB-q ss) change score 6 weeks after surgery. The change score is the score pre-operatively minus the score post-operatively. A positive score indicates lesser symptoms severity after surgery. The investigators will define a significant improvement to be a change score on the OAB-q ss≥10 based on previous work that determined that the minimally important difference in the OAB-q ss is 10 or higher.

Secondary: The secondary study endpoints will be the OAB-q HRQL change score and the UDI-6 change score calculated using the same method above.

Keywords
overactive bladder, pelvic organ prolapse, TVT
Medical subject headings
Urinary Bladder, Overactive, Pelvic Organ Prolapse

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02502838
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Prolapse surgery without TVTPatients who plan to undergo prolapse repair alone
Prolapse surgery with TVTPatients who plan to undergo prolapse repair with an additional TVT procedure

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q short form)

    Change in the OAB-q score at 6 weeks as compared to baseline. The OAB-q short form is a validated questionnaire which includes a 6-item symptoms bother scale (OAB-q ss) and a 13-item HRQL scale (OAB-q HRQL)

    Measured: baseline and 6 weeks

  2. Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q short form)

    Change in the OAB-q score at 6 months as compared to baseline.

    Measured: baseline and 6 months

  3. Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q short form)

    Change in the OAB-q score at 12 months as compared to baseline.

    Measured: baseline and 12 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. UDI-6 change score

    Change in the UDI-6 score at 6 weeks as compared to baseline. UDI-6 is a validated questionnaire pertaining to urinary symptoms. It is based on a 5 point scale- 0 for no, and then in terms of how bothersome symptoms are 2- not at all, 3- somewhat, 4- moderately, 5- quite a bit.

    Measured: baseline and 6 weeks

  2. UDI-6 change score

    Change in the UDI-6 score at 6 months as compared to baseline.

    Measured: baseline and 6 months

  3. UDI-6 change score

    Change in the UDI-6 score at 12 months as compared to baseline.

    Measured: baseline and 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Jul 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2015
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2017
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02502838
Sponsor's protocol ID
GCO 15-0394
Status last verified
Aug 2017
First submitted
16 Jul 2015
Last updated
1 Sep 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Overactive Bladder and Pelvic Organ Prolapse, run by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Sep 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q short form) (time frame: baseline and 6 weeks). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Sep 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in