AzTrials
AzTrials

Hand BurnsNCT02501720

Comparison of Outcome of Post Burn Flexion Contracture Release Under Tourniquet Verses Tumescent Technique in Children

A study testing post burn flexion contractures release using tumescent solution and Contracture release and application of FTSG in people with Hand Burns and Flexion Contracture, run by King Edward Medical University.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Post burn flexion contractures are common in pediatric age group. Release of contracture and coverage with full thickness skin graft (FTSG) is a widely used procedure for this problem. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 3 to 12 years
Conditions the study is for
Hand Burns, Flexion Contracture
What is being tested?
post burn flexion contractures release using tumescent solution and Contracture release and application of FTSG
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Sep 2015to Mar 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 3 to 12 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Children with post burn flexion contractures involving volar aspect of palm and fingers
  • Possible to cover the defect with full thickness skin graft
  • age range of 3 to 12 years.
  • Patients of both genders

Who cannot join

  • Children with recurrent post burn contractures.
  • Children with any history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy.
  • Children with any co-morbid condition making any contraindication of general anesthesia.
  • Patients having previous history of vascular insufficiency like Raynaud's disease or phenomenon, severe peripheral vascular disease and peripheral neuropathy.
  • The patient having allergic hypersensitivity to epinephrine, lidocaine.

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Muhammad M Bashir, F.C.P.S contact

923336517745

mmbashir1@gmail.com

Omer Iqbal, M.B.B.S contact

923336871707

umar_doc@hotmail.com

About this study

Post burn flexion contractures are common in pediatric age group. Release of contracture and coverage with full thickness skin graft (FTSG) is a widely used procedure for this problem. This procedure is routinely done under tourniquet control because bloodless operative field is essential to visualize important neurovascular structures in hand.

Use of tumescent technique without a tourniquet is gaining acceptance because it avoids complications associated with tourniquet use, maintains a blood less surgical field and decreases operative time. Furthermore use of tumescent anesthesia often results in better surgical outcomes.

Although the benefits of tumescent technique used in wide awake hand surgery are well documented, epinephrine at a concentration of 1:1 000,00 has also been used as a replacement for pneumatic tourniquet for release of hand contracture in infants and adults under general anesthesia. Thus epinephrine 1:1,000,00 in saline solution can be a potential replacement for a tourniquet in hand surgeries done under general anesthesia.

Read the detailed description

Post burn flexion contractures are common in pediatric age group. Release of contracture and coverage with full thickness skin graft (FTSG) is a widely used procedure for this problem. This procedure is routinely done under tourniquet control because bloodless operative field is essential to visualize important neurovascular structures in hand.

Use of tumescent technique without a tourniquet is gaining acceptance because it avoids complications associated with tourniquet use, maintains a blood less surgical field and decreases operative time. Furthermore use of tumescent anesthesia often results in better surgical outcomes.

Although the benefits of tumescent technique used in wide awake hand surgery are well documented, epinephrine at a concentration of 1:1 000,000 has also been used as a replacement for pneumatic tourniquet for release of hand contracture in infants and adults under general anesthesia. Thus epinephrine 1:1,000,000 in saline solution can be a potential replacement for a tourniquet in hand surgeries done under general anesthesia.

To the investigators' knowledge no study has so far been done to compare the outcome of release of post burn flexion contractures under tumescent technique with general anesthesia or under tourniquet control with general anesthesia.

Being tested
post burn flexion contractures release under tourniquet control, post burn flexion contractures release using tumescent solution, Contracture release and application of FTSG
Keywords
burn, hand, flexion contracture, tourniquet, tumescent technique, children
Medical subject headings
Burns

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • post burn flexion contractures release under tourniquet controlProcedure or surgery

    post burn flexion contractures will be released under tourniquet control

  • post burn flexion contractures release using tumescent solutionProcedure or surgery

    post burn flexion contractures will be released using tumescent solution

  • Contracture release and application of FTSGProcedure or surgery

    Post burn flexion contractures will be released and full thickness skin graft(FTSG) will be applied.

Study groups in NCT02501720
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Tourniquet GroupActive comparatorPost burn flexion contractures will be released under tourniquet control
Receives: Procedure: post burn flexion contractures release under tourniquet control; Procedure: Contracture release and application of FTSG
Tumescent technique groupExperimentalPost burn flexion contractures will be released using Tumescent solution
Receives: Procedure: post burn flexion contractures release using tumescent solution; Procedure: Contracture release and application of FTSG

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Operative time to secure graft

    Operative time to secure graft will be measured by calculating the time taken to secure per square centimeter of graft.

    Time (T) in minutes to secure per cm2 of graft = Total operative time / size of graft secured in cm2 measured by transparent graft paper In tourniquet group total operative time will be measured as total time taken from start of applying tourniquet including time taken for exsanguinations to the time till completion of dressing.

    In tumescent group total operative time will be measured as total time taken from start of injecting the tumescent solution including waiting time for tumescent solution to produce maximum vasoconstriction (25 minutes) to the time till completion of dressing

    Measured: Time of surgery

  2. Percentage graft taken

    It will be measured by the percentage of graft take at 14th post-operative day. Percentage graft take = Graft secured at the time of operation measured by using transparent graph paper / graft take at 14th post-operative day measured by using transparent graph paper.

    Measured: 14th day post surgery

  3. Post-operative pain (FLACC scale)

    Post-operative pain will be measured by blinded on duty doctor using Face Leg Activity Cry Consolability (FLACC) scale. Postoperative pain will be measured by using FLACC pain scale by blinded observer at first hour postoperatively taking time of arrival in the ward as zero hour

    Measured: At First hour after arrival in ward following surgery

  4. Post-operative pain (FLACC scale)

    Post-operative pain will be measured by blinded on duty doctor using Face Leg Activity Cry Consolability (FLACC) scale. Postoperative pain will be measured by using FLACC pain scale by blinded observer at 6th hour postoperatively taking time of arrival in the ward as zero hour.

    Measured: At 6th hour after arrival in ward following surgery

  5. Post-operative pain (FLACC scale)

    Post-operative pain will be measured by blinded on duty doctor using Face Leg Activity Cry Consolability (FLACC) scale. Postoperative pain will be measured by using FLACC pain scale by blinded observer at 12th hour postoperatively taking time of arrival in the ward as zero hour.

    Measured: At 12th hour after arrival in ward following surgery

  6. Post-operative pain (FLACC scale)

    Post-operative pain will be measured by blinded on duty doctor using Face Leg Activity Cry Consolability (FLACC) scale. Postoperative pain will be measured by using FLACC pain scale by blinded observer at 24th hour postoperatively taking time of arrival in the ward as zero hour.

    Measured: At 24th hour after arrival in ward following surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Jul 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2015
  3. Primary completionMar 2016 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMar 2016 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
80 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02501720
Sponsor's protocol ID
2335
Status last verified
Jul 2015
First submitted
12 Jul 2015
Last updated
17 Jul 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Spuy L. Complications of arterial tourniquet. South Afr J Anaesth Analg. 2012; 18: 14-18.

  • Lalonde D, Martin A. Tumescent local anesthesia for hand surgery: improved results, cost effectiveness, and wide-awake patient satisfaction. Arch Plast Surg. 2014 Jul;41(4):312-6. doi: 10.5999/aps.2014.41.4.312. Epub 2014 Jul 15.

    PubMed 25075350
  • Lalonde D. Minimally invasive anesthesia in wide awake hand surgery. Hand Clin. 2014 Feb;30(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2013.08.015. Epub 2013 Nov 9.

    PubMed 24286736
  • Teo I, Lam W, Muthayya P, Steele K, Alexander S, Miller G. Patients' perspective of wide-awake hand surgery--100 consecutive cases. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2013 Nov;38(9):992-9. doi: 10.1177/1753193412475241. Epub 2013 Jan 24.

    PubMed 23348603
  • Al Youha S, Lalonde DH. Update/Review: changing of use of local anesthesia in the hand. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2014 Jun 6;2(5):e150. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000095. eCollection 2014 May.

    PubMed 25289343
  • Prasetyono TO. Tourniquet-Free Hand Surgery Using the One-per-Mil Tumescent Technique. Arch Plast Surg. 2013 Mar;40(2):129-33. doi: 10.5999/aps.2013.40.2.129. Epub 2013 Mar 11.

    PubMed 23533019
  • Shridharani S, Manson P, Magarakis M et al. The safety and efficacy of epinephrine in hand surgery: a systematic review of the literature and international survey. European Journal of Plastic Surgery. 2014; 37: 183-188.

  • Gumus N. Tumescent infiltration of lidocaine and adrenaline for burn surgery. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2011 Sep 30;24(3):144-8.

    PubMed 22396674

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing post burn flexion contractures release using tumescent solution and Contracture release and application of FTSG in people with Hand Burns and Flexion Contracture, run by King Edward Medical University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jul 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Muhammad M Bashir, F.C.P.S (923336517745, mmbashir1@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Operative time to secure graft (time frame: Time of surgery). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02501720, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jul 2015; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in