AzTrials
AzTrials

Small Cell Lung CancerPhase 1/2NCT02499770

Trilaciclib (G1T28), a CDK 4/6 Inhibitor, in Combination With Etoposide and Carboplatin in Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC)

A Phase 1/2 study testing Carboplatin, Trilaciclib and Etoposide in people with Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by G1 Therapeutics, Inc. at 40 sites in 7 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a study to investigate the potential clinical benefit of trilaciclib (G1T28) in preserving the bone marrow and the immune system, and enhancing chemotherapy antitumor efficacy when administered prior to carboplatin and etoposide in first line treatment for patients with newly diagnosed extensive-stage SCLC. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Small Cell Lung Cancer
What is being tested?
Carboplatin, Trilaciclib and Etoposide
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
122 participants
Where
40 sitesin 7 countries
Study dates
26 Jun 2015to 22 Feb 2019
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female subjects aged ≥18 years
  • Unequivocally confirmed diagnosis of SCLC by histology or cytology, preferably including the presence of neuroendocrine features by immunohistochemistry
  • At least 1 target lesion that is unirradiated and measurable by RECIST, Version 1.1
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 - 2
  • Adequate organ function

Who cannot join

  • Prior chemotherapy for extensive-stage SCLC
  • Presence of symptomatic brain metastases requiring immediate treatment with radiation therapy or steroids.
  • Uncontrolled ischemic heart disease or uncontrolled symptomatic congestive heart failure
  • Known history of stroke or cerebrovascular accident within 6 months prior to enrollment
  • Other uncontrolled serious chronic disease or conditions that in the investigator's opinion could affect compliance or follow-up in the protocol
  • Concurrent radiotherapy to any site or radiotherapy within 2 weeks prior to enrollment or previous radiotherapy to the target lesion sites (the sites that are to be followed for determination of a response)
  • Receipt of any investigational medication within 4 weeks prior to enrollment

Trial locations and contacts

40 sites in 7 countries.

40 sites in 7 countries

United States26 sites
  • University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center

    Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87106

  • University Cancer and Blood Center, LLC

    Athens, Georgia, 30607

  • Emory University

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30322

  • Center For Cancer and Blood Disorders

    Bethesda, Maryland, 20817

  • Boca Raton Regional Hospital - Lynn Cancer Institute

    Boca Raton, Florida, 33486

  • Roswell Park

    Buffalo, New York, 14263

  • UNC - Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27514

  • Memorial Hospital - Univ. of Colorado Health

    Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80909

  • University of Colorado Health, Oncology Clinical Research Northern Region

    Fort Collins, Colorado, 80528

  • Florida Cancer Specialists - South

    Fort Myers, Florida, 33916

  • Greenville Health System

    Greenville, South Carolina, 29605

  • Genesis Cancer Center

    Hot Springs, Arkansas, 71913

  • Tennessee Cancer Specialists

    Knoxville, Tennessee, 37909

  • Hanna Cancer Associates - University of Tennessee

    Knoxville, Tennessee, 37920

  • Norris Cotton Cancer Center

    Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756

  • Norton Cancer Institute

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40202

  • Oklahoma University - Peggy and Charles Stephenson Cancer Center

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73117

  • Thomas Jefferson University

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107

  • Highlands Oncology Group

    Rogers, Arkansas, 72758

  • Guthrie Medical Group, PC

    Sayre, Pennsylvania, 18840

  • Gibbs Cancer Center

    Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29203

  • Florida Cancer Specialists - North

    Tavares, Florida, 32778

  • Texas Oncology

    Tyler, Texas, 75702

  • Northwest Cancer Specialists, P.C.

    Vancouver, Washington, 98684

  • Florida Cancer Specialists - East

    West Palm Beach, Florida, 33401

  • The Oncology Institute of Hope and Innovation

    Whittier, California, 90603

Other trials in United States

Spain5 sites
  • Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

    Barcelona, 08041

  • Consorcio Hospitalario Provincial

    Castillón, 12002

  • Hgu Gregorio Maranon

    Madrid, 28009

  • Fundacion Jimenez Diaz

    Madrid, 28040

  • Hospital Regional Universitario HRU Carlos Haya Malaga

    Málaga, Andalusia, 29010

Other trials in Spain

Hungary3 sites
  • Orszagos Koranyi Tbc es Pulmonologiai Intezet, XI. Tudobelosztaly

    Budapest, 1121

  • Veszprem Megyei Tudogyogyintezet

    Farkasgyepű, Veszprém megye, 8582

  • Hetenyi Geza Korhaz

    Szolnok, 5000

Other trials in Hungary

Poland3 sites
  • Samodzielny Publiczny ZespAA GruAicy i ChorAb PA¿uc

    Olsztyn, 10-357

  • Wojewodzki Szpital Zespolony im. L. Rydygiera

    Torun, 87-100

  • Centrum Onkologii-Instytut im. Marii Sklodowskiej-Curie

    Warsaw, 02-781

Other trials in Poland

France1 site
  • CHU de Rennes Hopital Pontchaillou

    Rennes, 35033

Other trials in France

Georgia1 site
  • ARENSIA Exploratory Medicine LLC

    Tbilisi, 0112

Other trials in Georgia

Moldova1 site
  • ARENSIA Exploratory Medicine Phase I Unit, The Institute of Oncology

    Chisinau, 2025

Other trials in Moldova

About this study

Official title: Phase 1b/2a Safety and Pharmacokinetic Study of G1T28 in Patients With Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) Receiving Etoposide and Carboplatin

This is a study to investigate the potential clinical benefit of trilaciclib (G1T28) in preserving the bone marrow and the immune system, and enhancing chemotherapy antitumor efficacy when administered prior to carboplatin and etoposide in first line treatment for patients with newly diagnosed extensive-stage SCLC.

The study consists of 2 parts: a limited open-label, dose-finding portion (Part 1), and a randomized double-blind portion (Part 2). Both parts include 3 study phases: Screening Phase, Treatment Phase, and Survival Follow-up Phase. The Treatment Phase begins on the day of first dose with study treatment and completes at the Post-Treatment Visit. Approximately, 90 patients will be enrolled in the study; 20 patients in the Part 1 and 70 patients in the Part 2 portion.

Being tested
Carboplatin, Placebo, Trilaciclib, Etoposide
Keywords
Small Cell Lung Cancer, CDK 4/6 Inhibitor
Medical subject headings
Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CarboplatinDrug

    Also called Paraplatin

  • PlaceboDrug

  • TrilaciclibDrug

    Also called G1T28

  • EtoposideDrug

    Also called VP-16, Toposar

Study groups in NCT02499770
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
trilaciclib + carboplatin/etoposideExperimentalAll patients in part 1 will receive trilaciclib (G1T28) prior to standard chemotherapy- carboplatin and etoposide. Patients will have PK assessments completed on days 1 and 3 in cycle 1 only. All patents will be monitored for safety and tumor response based on RECIST version 1.1. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and concomitant medications commences at the time that informed consent is obtained and continues through the Post Treatment Visit.
Receives: Drug: Carboplatin; Drug: Trilaciclib; Drug: Etoposide
trilaciclib/placebo + carboplatin/etoposideExperimentalAll patients enrolled in part 2 will be randomized to receive either trilaciclib (G1T28) or placebo administered prior to standard chemotherapy- carboplatin and etoposide. All patents will be monitored for safety and tumor response based on RECIST version 1.1. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and concomitant medications commences at the time that informed consent is obtained and continues through the Post Treatment Visit.
Receives: Drug: Carboplatin; Drug: Placebo; Drug: Trilaciclib; Drug: Etoposide

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities by Cohort in Cycle 1, Part 1

    Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were drug-related toxicities defined as follows:

    1. Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 0.5 × 10^9/L lasting for ≥ 7 days
    2. ≥ Grade 3 neutropenic infection/febrile neutropenia
    3. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia (TCP) or ≥ Grade 3 TCP with bleeding
    4. Unable to start next cycle of chemotherapy due to lack of recovery to an ANC ≥ 1.5 × 10^9/L and platelet count ≥ 100 × 10^9/L
    5. ≥ Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity (nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea failing maximal medical management; fatigue lasting for > 72 hours)

    Toxicities not clearly related to etoposide/carboplatin therapy were also considered for the purposes of determining DLTs.

    Measured: Days 1-21 of Cycle 1

  2. Incidence of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Related AEs, Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation in Part 1

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs were defined as any AE that started on or after the first dose of study drug and up to the last dose +30 days. SAEs were defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, was life threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity or was a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Relatedness to study drug was assessed by the investigator. Related refers to those events that were Possibly, Probably, or Definitely Related. AEs with an unknown/not reported onset date were also included.

    Measured: TEAEs were any AE that started on or after the first dose of study drug and up to the last dose +30 days (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 374 days)

  3. Duration of Severe (Grade 4) Neutropenia in Part 2

    Severe (Grade 4) neutropenia was defined as at least 1 ANC value <0.5 × 10^9/L during the treatment period. Within each cycle, the duration (days) of severe neutropenia was defined as the number of days from the date of the first ANC value of <0.5 × 10^9/L observed between start of cycle and end of cycle to the date of the first ANC value ≥0.5 × 10^9/L that met the following criteria: 1) occurred after the ANC value of <0.5 × 10^9/L and 2) no other ANC values <0.5 × 10^9/L occurred between this day and end of cycle. The duration of severe neutropenia only included participants who had at least 1 severe neutropenia event in the cycle, and censoring rules were applied for unresolved severe neutropenia in a cycle. For the treatment period, the overall duration of severe neutropenia was the median value among the durations from all cycles.

    Measured: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)

Secondary outcomes (49)
  1. Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Trilaciclib in Cycle 1, Part 1

    Cmax of trilaciclib in plasma was determined from individual concentration-time data by non-compartmental analysis methods. The actual sampling times in relation to dosing were used. For estimation of Cmax, a concentration that was below the limit of quantification (BLQ) was assigned a value of zero if it occurred in a profile before the first measurable concentration. If a BLQ value occurred after a measurable concentration in a profile, and was followed by a value above the lower limit of quantification, then the BLQ was treated as missing data. If a BLQ value occurred at the end of the collection interval (after the last quantifiable concentration) it was treated as missing data. If two BLQ values occurred in succession after Cmax, the profile was deemed to have terminated at the first BLQ value and any subsequent concentrations were omitted.

    Measured: Days 1 and 3 of Cycle 1 for a 21-day cycle

  2. Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) for Trilaciclib in Cycle 1, Part 1

    AUC0-inf of trilaciclib in plasma was determined from individual concentration-time data by non-compartmental analysis methods. The actual sampling times in relation to dosing were used.

    Measured: Days 1 and 3 of Cycle 1 for a 21-day cycle

  3. Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Trilaciclib in Cycle 1, Part 1

    Tmax of trilaciclib in plasma was determined from individual concentration-time data by non-compartmental analysis methods. The actual sampling times in relation to dosing were used.

    Measured: Days 1 and 3 of Cycle 1 for a 21-day cycle

  4. Cmax of Etoposide and Free and Total Carboplatin in Cycle 1, Part 1

    Cmax of etoposide and free and total carboplatin in plasma were determined from individual concentration-time data by non-compartmental analysis methods. The actual sampling times in relation to dosing were used. For estimation of Cmax, a concentration that was BLQ was assigned a value of zero if it occurred in a profile before the first measurable concentration. If a BLQ value occurred after a measurable concentration in a profile, and was followed by a value above the lower limit of quantification, then the BLQ was treated as missing data. If a BLQ value occurred at the end of the collection interval (after the last quantifiable concentration) it was treated as missing data. If two BLQ values occurred in succession after Cmax, the profile was deemed to have terminated at the first BLQ value and any subsequent concentrations were omitted.

    Measured: Days 1 and 3 of Cycle 1 for a 21-day cycle (carboplatin was only dosed on Day 1 so there are no Day 3 Cmax values)

  5. AUC0-inf of Etoposide and Free and Total Carboplatin in Cycle 1, Part 1

    AUC0-inf of etoposide and free and total carboplatin in plasma were determined from individual concentration-time data by non-compartmental analysis methods. The actual sampling times in relation to dosing were used.

    Measured: Days 1 and 3 of Cycle 1 for a 21-day cycle (carboplatin was only dosed on Day 1 so there are no Day 3 AUC0-inf values)

  6. Tmax of Etoposide and Free and Total Carboplatin in Cycle 1, Part 1

    Tmax of etoposide and free and total carboplatin in plasma was determined from individual concentration-time data by non-compartmental analysis methods. The actual sampling times in relation to dosing were used.

    Measured: Days 1 and 3 of Cycle 1 for a 21-day cycle (carboplatin was only dosed on Day 1 so there are no Day 3 Tmax values)

  7. Duration of Severe (Grade 4) Neutropenia in Part 1

    Severe (Grade 4) neutropenia was defined as at least 1 ANC value <0.5 × 10^9/L during the treatment period. Within each cycle, the duration (days) of severe neutropenia was defined as the number of days from the date of the first ANC value of <0.5 × 10^9/L observed between start of cycle and end of cycle to the date of the first ANC value ≥0.5 × 10^9/L that met the following criteria: 1) occurred after the ANC value of <0.5 × 10^9/L and 2) no other ANC values <0.5 × 10^9/L occurred between this day and end of cycle. The duration of severe neutropenia only included participants who had at least 1 severe neutropenia event in the cycle, and censoring rules were applied for unresolved severe neutropenia in a cycle. For the treatment period, the overall duration of severe neutropenia was the median value among the durations from all cycles.

    Measured: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)

  8. Occurrence of Severe (Grade 4) Neutropenia in Part 1

    Severe (Grade 4) neutropenia was defined as at least 1 ANC value <0.5 × 10^9/L during the treatment period.

    Measured: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)

  9. Occurrence of Febrile Neutropenia in Part 1

    Each febrile neutropenia event (as defined by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE]) was captured as an AE. The occurrence of febrile neutropenia was defined as at least 1 febrile neutropenia event during the treatment period. For the treatment period, the total number of febrile neutropenia events was the number of febrile neutropenia events with a unique start date.

    Measured: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)

  10. Duration of Grade 3/4 Neutropenia in Part 1

    Grade 3/4 neutropenia was defined as at least 1 ANC value <1.0 × 10^9/L during the treatment period. Within each cycle, duration (days) of Grade 3/4 neutropenia was defined as the number of days from the date of the first ANC value of <1.0 × 10^9/L observed between start of cycle and end of cycle to the date of the first ANC value ≥1.0 × 10^9/L that met the following criteria: 1) occurred after the ANC value of <1.0 × 10^9/L and 2) no other ANC values <1.0 × 10^9/L occurred between this day and end of cycle. The duration of Grade 3/4 neutropenia only included participants who had at least 1 Grade 3/4 neutropenia event in the cycle, and censoring rules were applied for unresolved Grade 3/4 neutropenia in a cycle. For the treatment period, the overall duration of Grade 3/4 neutropenia was the median value among the durations of Grade 3/4 neutropenia from all cycles.

    Measured: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)

  11. Occurrence of Grade 3/4 Neutropenia in Part 1

    Grade 3/4 neutropenia was defined as at least 1 ANC value <1.0 × 10^9/L during the treatment period.

    Measured: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)

  12. Nadir of Absolute Neutrophil Count in Cycle 1, Part 1

    Cycle nadir was the lowest value for ANC that occurred between start of cycle and end of cycle and was less than the cycle baseline.

    Measured: From baseline to the end of Cycle 1

  13. Occurrence of Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) Administration in Part 1

    Administration of G-CSF was collected with concomitant medications, which were coded using World Health Organization Drug Dictionary (WHO-DD) Version September 2017. A cycle where G-CSF was administered concurrently was identified by comparing the start and stop dates of each administration of G-CSF to the start of cycle and end of cycle. The occurrence of G-CSF administrations was defined as at least 1 cycle with G-CSF administrations during the treatment period. For the treatment period, the total number of G-CSF administrations was the number of cycles with G-CSF administrations.

    Measured: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)

  14. Occurrence of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion in Part 1

    Within a cycle, a RBC transfusion event was defined as either 1) an actual RBC transfusion, or 2) eligible for RBC transfusion (defined as hemoglobin <8.0 g/dL). The occurrence of RBC transfusions was defined as at least 1 cycle with RBC transfusion during the treatment period. For the treatment period, the total number of RBC transfusions was the number of cycles with RBC transfusions.

    Measured: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)

  15. Change From Baseline of Hemoglobin at the End of Cycle 6, Part 1

    Blood samples were collected for local clinical laboratory assessment of hemoglobin levels.

    Measured: Baseline, Day 1, Day 3, Day 8, Day 10, and Day 15 of a 21-day cycle x 6

  16. Occurrence of Erythropoietin Stimulating Agent (ESA) Administration in Part 1

    Administration of ESAs was collected with concomitant medications, which were coded using WHO-DD Version September 2017. A cycle where an ESA was administered concurrently was identified by comparing the start and stop dates of each administration of an ESA to the start of cycle and end of cycle. The occurrence of ESA administration was at least 1 cycle with an ESA administration during the treatment period. For the treatment period, the total number of ESA administrations was the number of cycles with ESA administrations.

    Measured: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)

  17. Occurrence of Platelet Transfusion in Part 1

    Within a cycle, a platelet transfusion event was defined as either 1) an actual platelet transfusion, or 2) eligible for platelet transfusion (defined as a platelet count ≤10 × 10^9/L). The occurrence of platelet transfusions was defined as at least 1 cycle with platelet transfusion during the treatment period. For the treatment period, the total number of platelet transfusions was the number of cycles with platelet transfusions.

    Measured: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)

  18. Change From Baseline of Platelet Count at the End of Cycle 6, Part 1

    Blood samples were collected for local clinical laboratory assessment of platelet count.

    Measured: Baseline, Day 1, Day 3, Day 8, Day 10, and Day 15 of a 21-day cycle x 6

  19. Change From Baseline of Lymphocyte Count at the End of Cycle 6, Part 1

    Blood samples were collected for local clinical laboratory assessment of lymphocyte count.

    Measured: Baseline, Day 1, Day 3, Day 8, Day 10, and Day 15 of a 21-day cycle x 6

  20. Occurrence of Dose Reduction in Part 1

    Dose reductions were not permitted for trilaciclib, per study protocol. Dose reductions for E/P were derived from changes in the protocol-specified dose on the dosing page and corresponded to the reductions for toxicity specified in the protocol. No more than 2 dose reductions of E/P in total were allowed for any participant. Simultaneous reductions in the doses of E/P were counted as 1 dose reduction. For the treatment period, the total number of dose reductions was the number of cycles where there was at least 1 dose reduction.

    Measured: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)

  21. Occurrence of Infectious SAEs in Part 1

    SAEs were defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, was life threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity or was a congenital anomaly/birth defect. An infectious SAE was a serious event in the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system organ class "infections and infestations" and a preferred term of anal abscess, bacteraemia, bronchitis, candida infection, chronic sinusitis, conjunctivitis, infection, influenza, nasopharyngitis, oral candidiasis, oral herpes, pharyngitis streptococcal, pneumonia, pneumonia bacterial, respiratory tract infection, sepsis, skin infection, upper respiratory tract infection, urinary tract infection, urosepsis or viral upper respiratory tract infection.

    Measured: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)

  22. Occurrence of Pulmonary Infection SAE in Part 1

    SAEs were defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, was life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity or was a congenital anomaly/birth defect. A pulmonary infection SAE was a serious event in the MedDRA system organ class "infections and infestations" and a preferred term of bronchitis, influenza, pneumonia, pneumonia bacterial, respiratory tract infection, upper respiratory tract infection or viral upper respiratory tract infection.

    Measured: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)

  23. Occurrence of IV Antibiotic Administration in Part 1

    Intravenous antibiotic administration was collected with concomitant medications, which were coded using WHO-DD Version September 2017. A cycle where IV antibiotic was administered concurrently was identified by comparing the start and stop dates of each administration of IV antibiotic to the start of cycle and end of cycle. The occurrence of IV antibiotic administration was defined as at least 1 cycle with IV antibiotic administration during the treatment period. For the treatment period, the total number of IV antibiotic administrations was the number of cycles with IV antibiotic administrations.

    Measured: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)

  24. Time to First Major Adverse Hematologic Event (MAHE) in Part 1

    MAHE was a composite endpoint incorporating the measurement of several clinically meaningful aspects of myelopreservation into a single endpoint. The individual components for MAHE were hospitalization for a hematologic event, febrile neutropenia, death related to treatment, dose delay/reduction due to ANC or platelet counts, prolonged severe neutropenia (duration >5 days), RBC transfusion (actual or eligible) and platelet transfusion (actual or eligible). Time to first occurrence of a MAHE event was defined as the first time to observe an interested event among all the components, starting from the first dose date of study drug administration.

    Measured: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)

  25. Best Overall Tumor Response Based on Assessments in Part 1

    Tumor response was assessed by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Overall visit response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 was derived programmatically using data from target lesions (TLs), non-target lesions (NTLs), \& new lesions. Tumor response data were used to determine each participant's time point response \& best overall response (BOR). Complete response (CR) was disappearance of all TLs, any pathological lymph nodes selected as TLs must have reduced in short axis to <10 mm. Partial response (PR) was at least a 30% decrease from baseline in the sum of diameters of TLs, as long as criteria for progressive disease (PD) were not met. PD was a ≥20% increase in the smallest sum of diameters of TLs since treatment started (including baseline) and an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. Stable disease (SD) was neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD.

    Measured: Baseline, end of every two 21-day cycles, up until disease progression to a maximum of the time at least 70% overall survival (OS) events observed (a maximum of 4 years)

  26. Best Overall Tumor Response Based on Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) Assessments in Part 1

    Tumor response was assessed by CT or MRI. Overall visit response by RECIST v1.1 was determined by BICR. Tumor response data were used to determine each participant's time point response \& BOR. CR was disappearance of all TLs, any pathological lymph nodes selected as TLs must have reduced in short axis to <10 mm. PR was at least a 30% decrease from baseline in the sum of diameters of TLs, as long as criteria for PD were not met. PD was a ≥20% increase in the smallest sum of diameters of TLs since treatment started (including baseline) and an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. SD was neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD.

    Measured: Baseline, end of every two 21-day cycles, up until disease progression to a maximum of the time at least 70% OS events observed (a maximum of 4 years)

  27. Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Assessments in Part 1

    Tumor response was assessed by CT or MRI. PFS was defined as the time (months) from date of first dose date of study drug for participants in Part 1 until date of documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. More specifically, PFS was determined using all the assessment data up until the last evaluable visit prior to or on the date of i) disease progression as defined by RECIST 1.1 or by clinical criteria as determined by the investigator; or ii) withdrawal of consent; or iii) receiving subsequent anticancer therapy, whichever was earlier. For PFS determined using response data derived programmatically, either clinical progression or progression by RECIST (whichever came first) was considered. Median and inter-quartile range of PFS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

    Measured: Baseline, end of every two 21-day cycles, up until disease progression to a maximum of the time at least 70% OS events observed (a maximum of 4 years)

  28. OS in Part 1

    OS was calculated as the time (months) from date of first dose of study drug for participants in Part 1 to the date of death due to any cause. Participants who did not die during the study were censored at the date last known to be alive. Participants lacking data beyond the day of first dose of study drug had their survival time censored at day of first dose of study drug. OS was not censored if a participant received other anti-tumor treatments after the study drugs. Median and inter-quartile range of OS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

    Measured: Baseline up until death or a maximum of the time at least 70% OS events observed (a maximum of 4 years)

  29. Occurrence of Severe (Grade 4) Neutropenia in Part 2

    Severe (Grade 4) neutropenia was defined as at least 1 ANC value <0.5 × 10^9/L during the treatment period.

    Measured: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)

  30. Occurrence of Febrile Neutropenia in Part 2

    Each febrile neutropenia event (as defined by CTCAE) was captured as an AE. The occurrence of febrile neutropenia was defined as at least 1 febrile neutropenia event during the treatment period. For the treatment period, the total number of febrile neutropenia events was the number of febrile neutropenia events with a unique start date.

    Measured: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)

  31. Duration of Grade 3/4 Neutropenia in Part 2

    Grade 3/4 neutropenia was defined as at least 1 ANC value <1.0 × 10^9/L during the treatment period. Within each cycle, duration (days) of Grade 3/4 neutropenia was defined as the number of days from the date of the first ANC value of <1.0 × 10^9/L observed between start of cycle and end of cycle to the date of the first ANC value ≥1.0 × 10^9/L that met the following criteria: 1) occurred after the ANC value of <1.0 × 10^9/L and 2) no other ANC values <1.0 × 10^9/L occurred between this day and end of cycle. The duration of Grade 3/4 neutropenia only included participants who had at least 1 Grade 3/4 neutropenia event in the cycle, and censoring rules were applied for unresolved Grade 3/4 neutropenia in a cycle. For the treatment period, the overall duration of Grade 3/4 neutropenia was the median value among the durations of Grade 3/4 neutropenia from all cycles.

    Measured: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)

  32. Occurrence of Grade 3/4 Neutropenia in Part 2

    Grade 3/4 neutropenia was defined as at least 1 ANC value <1.0 × 10^9/L during the treatment period.

    Measured: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)

  33. Nadir of Absolute Neutrophil Count in Cycle 1, Part 2

    Cycle nadir was the lowest value for ANC that occurred between start of cycle and end of cycle and was less than the cycle baseline.

    Measured: From baseline to the end of Cycle 1

  34. Occurrence of G-CSF Administration in Part 2

    Administration of G-CSF was collected with concomitant medications, which were coded using WHO-DD Version September 2017. A cycle where G-CSF was administered concurrently was identified bycomparing the start and stop dates of each administration of G-CSF to the start of cycle and end of cycle. The occurrence of G-CSF administrations was defined as at least 1 cycle with G-CSF administrations during the treatment period. For the treatment period, the total number of G-CSF administrations was the number of cycles with G-CSF administrations.

    Measured: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)

  35. Occurrence of RBC Transfusion in Part 2

    Within a cycle, a RBC transfusion event was defined as either 1) an actual RBC transfusion, or 2) eligible for RBC transfusion (defined as hemoglobin <8.0 g/dL). The occurrence of RBC transfusions was defined as at least 1 cycle with RBC transfusion during the treatment period. For the treatment period, the total number of RBC transfusions was the number of cycles with RBC transfusions. If a participant did not have any RBC transfusions, they were assigned a value of 0.

    Measured: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)

  36. Change From Baseline of Hemoglobin at the End of Cycle 6, Part 2

    Blood samples were collected for local clinical laboratory assessment of hemoglobin levels.

    Measured: Baseline, Day 1, Day 3, Day 8, Day 10, and Day 15 of a 21-day cycle x 6

  37. Occurrence of ESA Administration in Part 2

    Administration of ESAs was collected with concomitant medications, which were coded using WHO-DD Version September 2017. A cycle where an ESA was administered concurrently was identified by comparing the start and stop dates of each administration of an ESA to the start of cycle and end of cycle. The occurrence of ESA administration was at least 1 cycle with an ESA administration during the treatment period. For the treatment period, the total number of ESA administrations was the number of cycles with ESA administrations.

    Measured: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)

  38. Occurrence of Platelet Transfusion in Part 2

    Within a cycle, a platelet transfusion event was defined as either 1) an actual platelet transfusion, or 2) eligible for platelet transfusion (defined as a platelet count ≤10 × 10^9/L). The occurrence of platelet transfusions was defined as at least 1 cycle with platelet transfusion during the treatment period. For the treatment period, the total number of platelet transfusions was the number of cycles with platelet transfusions.

    Measured: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)

  39. Change From Baseline of Platelet Count at the End of Cycle 6, Part 2

    Blood samples were collected for local clinical laboratory assessment of platelet count.

    Measured: Baseline, Day 1, Day 3, Day 8, Day 10, and Day 15 of a 21-day cycle x 6

  40. Change From Baseline of Lymphocyte Count at the End of Cycle 6, Part 2

    Blood samples were collected for local clinical laboratory assessment of lymphocyte count.

    Measured: Baseline, Day 1, Day 3, Day 8, Day 10, and Day 15 of a 21-day cycle x 6

  41. Occurrence of Dose Reduction in Part 2

    Dose reductions were not permitted for trilaciclib, per study protocol. Dose reductions for E/P were derived from changes in the protocol-specified dose on the dosing page and corresponded to the reductions for toxicity specified in the protocol. No more than 2 dose reductions of E/P in total were allowed for any participant. Simultaneous reductions in the doses of E/P were counted as 1 dose reduction. For the treatment period, the total number of dose reductions was the number of cycles where there was at least 1 dose reduction.

    Measured: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)

  42. Occurrence of Infectious SAEs in Part 2

    SAEs were defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, was life threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity or was a congenital anomaly/birth defect. An infectious SAE was a serious event in the MedDRA system organ class "infections and infestations" and a preferred term of anal abscess, bacteraemia, bronchitis, candida infection, chronic sinusitis, conjunctivitis, infection, influenza, nasopharyngitis, oral candidiasis, oral herpes, pharyngitis streptococcal, pneumonia, pneumonia bacterial, respiratory tract infection, sepsis, skin infection, upper respiratory tract infection, urinary tract infection, urosepsis or viral upper respiratory tract infection.

    Measured: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)

  43. Occurrence of Pulmonary Infection SAE in Part 2

    SAEs were defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, was life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity or was a congenital anomaly/birth defect. A pulmonary infection SAE was a serious event in the MedDRA system organ class "infections and infestations" and a preferred term of bronchitis, influenza, pneumonia, pneumonia bacterial, respiratory tract infection, upper respiratory tract infection or viral upper respiratory tract infection.

    Measured: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)

  44. Occurrence of IV Antibiotic Administration in Part 2

    Intravenous antibiotic administration was collected with concomitant medications, which were coded using WHO-DD Version September 2017. A cycle where IV antibiotic was administered concurrently was identified by comparing the start and stop dates of each administration of IV antibiotic to the start of cycle and end of cycle. The occurrence of IV antibiotic administration was defined as at least 1 cycle with IV antibiotic administration during the treatment period. For the treatment period, the total number of IV antibiotic administrations was the number of cycles with IV antibiotic administrations.

    Measured: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)

  45. Time to First MAHE in Part 2

    MAHE was a composite endpoint incorporating the measurement of several clinically meaningful aspects of myelopreservation into a single endpoint. The individual components for MAHE were hospitalization for a hematologic event, febrile neutropenia, death related to treatment, dose delay/reduction due to ANC or platelet counts, prolonged severe neutropenia (duration >5 days), RBC transfusion (actual or eligible) and platelet transfusion (actual or eligible). Time to first occurrence of a MAHE event was defined as the first time to observe an interested event among all the components, starting from the first dose date of study drug administration.

    Measured: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)

  46. Best Overall Tumor Response Based on Assessments in Part 2

    Tumor response was assessed by CT or MRI. Overall visit response by RECIST v1.1 was derived programmatically using data from TLs, NTLs, \& new lesions. Tumor response data were used to determine each participant's time point response \& BOR. CR was disappearance of all TLs, any pathological lymph nodes selected as TLs must have reduced in short axis to <10 mm. PR was at least a 30% decrease from baseline in the sum of diameters of TLs, as long as criteria for PD were not met. PD was a ≥20% increase in the smallest sum of diameters of TLs since treatment started (including baseline) and an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. SD was neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD.

    Measured: Baseline, end of every two 21-day cycles, up until disease progression to a maximum of the time at least 70% OS events observed (a maximum of 4 years)

  47. Best Overall Tumor Response Based on BICR Assessments in Part 2

    Tumor response was assessed by CT or MRI. Overall visit response by RECIST v1.1 was determined by BICR. Tumor response data were used to determine each participant's time point response \& BOR. CR was disappearance of all TLs, any pathological lymph nodes selected as TLs must have reduced in short axis to <10 mm. PR was at least a 30% decrease from baseline in the sum of diameters of TLs, as long as criteria for PD were not met. PD was a ≥20% increase in the smallest sum of diameters of TLs since treatment started (including baseline) and an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. SD was neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD.

    Measured: Baseline, end of every two 21-day cycles, up until disease progression to a maximum of the time at least 70% OS events observed (a maximum of 4 years)

  48. PFS Based on Assessments in Part 2

    Tumor response was assessed by CT or MRI. PFS was defined as the time (months) from date of first dose date of study drug for participants in Part 1 until date of documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. More specifically, PFS was determined using all the assessment data up until the last evaluable visit prior to or on the date of i) disease progression as defined by RECIST 1.1 or by clinical criteria as determined by the investigator; or ii) withdrawal of consent; or iii) receiving subsequent anticancer therapy, whichever was earlier. For PFS determined using response data derived programmatically, either clinical progression or progression by RECIST (whichever came first) was considered. Median and inter-quartile range of PFS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

    Measured: Baseline, end of every two 21-day cycles, up until disease progression to a maximum of the time at least 70% OS events observed (a maximum of 4 years)

  49. OS in Part 2

    OS was calculated as the time (months) from date of first dose of study drug for participants in Part 2 to the date of death due to any cause. Participants who did not die during the study were censored at the date last known to be alive. Participants lacking data beyond the day of first dose of study drug had their survival time censored at day of first dose of study drug. OS was not censored if a participant received other anti-tumor treatments after the study drugs. Median and inter-quartile range of OS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

    Measured: Baseline up until death or a maximum of the time at least 70% OS events observed (a maximum of 4 years)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Jul 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start26 Jun 2015
  3. Primary completion3 Jul 2017
  4. Study completion22 Feb 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
122 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02499770
Sponsor's protocol ID
G1T28-02
Other IDs
2016-001583-11, 2016
Status last verified
Aug 2020
First submitted
8 Jul 2015
Last updated
21 Aug 2020
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Marzano L, Darwich AS, Dan A, Tendler S, Lewensohn R, De Petris L, Raghothama J, Meijer S. Exploring the discrepancies between clinical trials and real-world data: A small-cell lung cancer study. Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Aug;17(8):e13909. doi: 10.1111/cts.13909.

    PubMed 39113428
  • Hussein M, Maglakelidze M, Richards DA, Sabatini M, Gersten TA, Lerro K, Sinielnikov I, Spira A, Pritchett Y, Antal JM, Malik R, Beck JT. Myeloprotective Effects of Trilaciclib Among Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer at Increased Risk of Chemotherapy-Induced Myelosuppression: Pooled Results from Three Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Studies. Cancer Manag Res. 2021 Aug 9;13:6207-6218. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S313045. eCollection 2021.

    PubMed 34408488
  • Ferrarotto R, Anderson I, Medgyasszay B, Garcia-Campelo MR, Edenfield W, Feinstein TM, Johnson JM, Kalmadi S, Lammers PE, Sanchez-Hernandez A, Pritchett Y, Morris SR, Malik RK, Csoszi T. Trilaciclib prior to chemotherapy reduces the usage of supportive care interventions for chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in patients with small cell lung cancer: Pooled analysis of three randomized phase 2 trials. Cancer Med. 2021 Sep;10(17):5748-5756. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4089. Epub 2021 Aug 18.

    PubMed 34405547
  • Li C, Hart L, Owonikoko TK, Aljumaily R, Rocha Lima CM, Conkling PR, Webb RT, Jotte RM, Schuster S, Edenfield WJ, Smith DA, Sale M, Roberts PJ, Malik RK, Sorrentino JA. Trilaciclib dose selection: an integrated pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of preclinical data and Phase Ib/IIa studies in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2021 May;87(5):689-700. doi: 10.1007/s00280-021-04239-9. Epub 2021 Feb 17.

    PubMed 33595690
  • Lai AY, Sorrentino JA, Dragnev KH, Weiss JM, Owonikoko TK, Rytlewski JA, Hood J, Yang Z, Malik RK, Strum JC, Roberts PJ. CDK4/6 inhibition enhances antitumor efficacy of chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations in preclinical models and enhances T-cell activation in patients with SCLC receiving chemotherapy. J Immunother Cancer. 2020 Oct;8(2):e000847. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-000847.

    PubMed 33004541
  • Weiss JM, Csoszi T, Maglakelidze M, Hoyer RJ, Beck JT, Domine Gomez M, Lowczak A, Aljumaily R, Rocha Lima CM, Boccia RV, Hanna W, Nikolinakos P, Chiu VK, Owonikoko TK, Schuster SR, Hussein MA, Richards DA, Sawrycki P, Bulat I, Hamm JT, Hart LL, Adler S, Antal JM, Lai AY, Sorrentino JA, Yang Z, Malik RK, Morris SR, Roberts PJ, Dragnev KH; G1T28-02 Study Group. Myelopreservation with the CDK4/6 inhibitor trilaciclib in patients with small-cell lung cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy: a phase Ib/randomized phase II trial. Ann Oncol. 2019 Oct 1;30(10):1613-1621. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz278.

    PubMed 31504118

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing Carboplatin, Trilaciclib and Etoposide in people with Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by G1 Therapeutics, Inc. at 40 sites in 7 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Aug 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 40 sites in United States, Spain, Hungary, Poland, France and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Jul 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities by Cohort in Cycle 1, Part 1 (time frame: Days 1-21 of Cycle 1). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02499770, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Aug 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in