HIV/AIDSTASCONCT02497989
Evaluating Demand Creation Strategies for Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision (VMMC) in Kenya
A study testing Inter-personal Communication (IPC) and Dedicated Service Outlets (DSO) in people with HIV/AIDS, run by Impact Research & Development Organization at 1 site in Kenya.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of two interventions - Inter-Personal Communication [IPC] and Dedicated Service Outlets [DSOs] - in recruiting men aged 25-39 years for Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision (VMMC) services. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 25 to 39 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV/AIDS
- What is being tested?
- Inter-personal Communication (IPC) and Dedicated Service Outlets (DSO)
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2,785 participants
- Where
- 1 siteKenya
- Study dates
- Feb 2015to 22 Jan 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 25 to 39 years
- Men only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Uncircumcised men
- Aged 25 - 39 years
- Residents of the study village (has been living in the physical structure such as a compound or homestead identified during the enumeration and who has been consuming or making some contribution to food and other shared household resources).
- Intend to continue living in the village for the 9 months after enrollment, which is the estimated duration of data collection.
- Give written consent to participate in the study and the interventions.
Who cannot join
- Circumcised men
- Aged <25- or >39 years
- Non-resident of target villages
- Plans to move away from the village within 9 months after enrollment
- Does not give consent to participate in the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Male Circumcision for HIV Prevention in Kenya: Seeking Effective Strategies to Recruit Older Men
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of two interventions - Inter-Personal Communication [IPC] and Dedicated Service Outlets [DSOs] - in recruiting men aged 25-39 years for Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision (VMMC) services.
Read the detailed description
STUDY AIMS Aim 1: Assess the rate of uptake of VMMC services by men aged 25-39 years exposed to Inter-Personal Communication (IPC) vs. Designated (older men only) Service Outlets (DSO) vs. IPC and DSO interventions combined vs. no intervention.
Aim 2: Determine through testing of unlinked de-identified blood from bleeding vessels from the surgical wound, the proportion of men whose HIV status is unknown who are HIV infected (Sub-study 1).
Aim 3: Determine the cost of providing VMMC among the three interventions relative to each other and to no intervention.
MAIN STUDY DESIGN: The study proposes to conduct a cluster randomized-controlled trial, with Locations forming the unit of randomization. Within the selected Locations, the study shall randomly select approximately 16% (209) of the villages which will be sufficient to generate the required sample size.
Sample size Determination:
Sample size for detecting the impact of the interventions on VMMC uptake - in order to be able demonstrate at least a 33.3 % increase in the rate of VMMC among young adult men in intervention arms when compared to those in control arm with 80% statistical power, and Bonferroni adjusted two-sided α=(0.05/3)=0.017 following the implementation of study interventions, the study will need a sample size of 4,932 men reached with the intervention.
Potential participants to be reached - An effect size equal to 33.3% increase in MC from 30% to 40% will require about 1233 participants per study arm (total 4932), while an effect size equal to 50% increase in VMMC from 30% to 45% will require 573 participants per study arm (total 2292). Adjusting for a refusal rate of 15% and a loss to follow up of 15%, suggests contacting 1603 per study arm resulting in a total of 6412 uncircumcised men aged 25-39 years.
PHASE 1: HOUSEHOLD ENUMERATION To ascertain the size of eligible population (uncircumcised men aged 25-39 years), the study will conduct complete household listing in all selected villages and enumerate male members in each household aged 25-39 years. During this exercise, study staff shall physically visit all homes in the study villages and assign a unique identification number to every household (HIN). Enumeration shall be through home visits ONLY and not by any other means. The unique HIN assigned during the enumeration will be entered on Excel database and households with men aged 25-39 years will be sorted out and put on a separate list. The list will be used to create a database of eligible men in each village. Determining the number of households with eligible men will help in knowing the denominator and in planning for recruitment.
PHASE 2: CONDUCTING RAPID FORMATIVE STUDY (Sub-study 1) Justification: This phase is intended to provide information for use in delivering the interventions. The study have already drafted messages based on existing literature for use in IPC and IPC+DSO intervention Locations/villages. However, since almost all the available information on barriers to and facilitators of VMMC in literature were collected among men of all ages and were not disaggregated by age group, the investigators cannot assume they are automatically relevant to older men. As such, it will still be necessary to conduct a rapid formative study to explore reasons why older men aged 25-39 years go or do not go for VMMC services. Information obtained from this phase will be used to modify if indicated, the messages developed from existing literature.
SUB-STUDY DESIGN: This phase shall comprise of Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) and In-Depth Interviews. Twelve FGDs, with 6-10 participants, will be held with six groups of circumcised men and six groups of uncircumcised men in each of the following age categories: 25-29 years, 30-34 years and 35-39 years. A similar number of FGDs will be held with female partners of circumcised and female partners of uncircumcised men in same age categories.
Besides FGDs, the investigators will conduct 48 IDIs to capture confidential information that some men and women would otherwise not divulge in an FGD setting.
PHASE 3: ESTABLISHING BASELINE VMMC PREVALENCE AND PROPORTION OF ELIGIBLE MEN Based on the eligible participants' list, research assistants will only go back to households with men aged 25 to 39 years. Before administering enrollment consent, RAs will ask participants to identify a private location within or outside the house where they can do consenting and interviewing. The RA will then administer consent for participating in the study, enrol consenting participants and assign Participant Unique ID number.
After assigning the participant unique ID number, the RA will conduct the baseline interview, verify the MC status and inform participants of their intervention arm and deliver the intervention if the participant is available (if not, another visit will be made at a later date to deliver the intervention). During the interview, study staff will document participants' circumcision status from the verbal report. After the interview, participants who consented to physical verification will be asked to choose where this can be performed.
At enrollment, participants will be given 3 months within which to go for circumcision, Participants can go whenever they want for VMMC, but the study will only capture their data if they go within 3 months. They will also be informed that a reminder of the expiry date for circumcision will be sent through text message to all participants one month before the expiry of the circumcision window period.
Details of participants enrolled in the study will be entered into an excel Master Log which will contain all participant details; 3 names, ID number, age, location, village, the telephone number of the participants or of close friend and date of enrollment.
PHASE 4: IMPLEMENTING THE INTERVENTIONS The study has four intervention arms: Inter-Personal Communications (IPC), Dedicated Service Outlets (DSOs), a combination of IPC and DSO (IPC+DSO), and Control. The interventions and how each of them will be implemented are described under 'Protocol arms and interventions' section below.
HIV TESTING OF PARTICIPANTS WITH UNKNOWN HIV STATUS (Sub-study 2) In VMMC program undertaken by Impact Research and Development Organization (IRDO) and in other Kenyan programs as well, between 10% and 30% of men decline HIV testing. Given that VMMC is offered principally as an HIV prevention strategy, it is important to determine the HIV status of those who decline testing, and if the prevalence is significantly higher than those who accept testing, there will be need to design approaches to improve uptake of testing. This is particularly important following results from a recently concluded study that indicated that 44% of HIV-infected men resumed sex before the recommended 6 weeks of sexual abstinence.
Sample size for HIV prevalence among uncircumcised men whose HIV status is unknown (Sub-study 2):
Investigators estimated that they will need to test randomly selected unlinked blood samples from 163 men per arm whose HIV status is unknown in order to estimate a HIV prevalence that falls within 10% points of the true population prevalence with 95% confidence. The study staff will collect samples from all of men who refuse testing but consent to Unlinked HIV testing.
With a refusal rate of 23.6% voluntary HIV testing, and a consenting rate of 60%, then the rate of getting a man who refuses testing but consents to the testing of unlinked blood sample from his bleeding vessels is 14.2%. In other words, of the 4932 participants in the main study, investigators expect 1164 (4932*0.236) to refuse HIV testing. With assumed unlinked HIV testing acceptance rate of 60%, the study can obtain 700 such men from a sample size of 4932 in the main study. For a design effect of 2.5, using a sample size of 700 for the sub-study will enable us to estimate the HIV prevalence of 21.6% with a precision of 4.8%=sqrt[(2.5*1.96^2*.216*.784)/700].
Methods/Procedure:
RAs will perform unlinked testing of blood from bleeding vessels or finger prick of those whose HIV status is unknown. While the call for proposals recommended testing blood from the excised foreskin, investigators are concerned that they may not be able to harvest sufficient blood from most foreskins to perform the test. This is because the forceps-guided method being used in Kenya crushes the foreskin and compresses the blood vessels that supply the distal section. This results in little or no bleeding on the excised foreskin. The study, therefore, propose to only collect blood samples from the bleeding vessels or finger prick from participants (n=700).
COSTING VMMC IN THE CONTEXT OF THE INTERVENTIONS (SUB-STUDY 3) Study Design: Data on costing will be collected across all the study arms. Whereas economic evaluation of service delivery has been conducted in several contexts there is limited information on the cost-effectiveness of various approaches used for recruitment to increase service uptake. The study plan to assess the cost-effectiveness of demand creation for VMMC services based on the three interventions. The results will demonstrate the accrued costs and net savings associated with each intervention strategy.
Methods: The primary outcome of the main study is the incremental change in circumcisions performed attributable to the respective demand creation interventions. Costs will be estimated for primary outcome with reference to the control group, in which the study will continue to provide routine recruitment approaches. This will demonstrate how the costs vary depending on the mode of demand creation.
The study shall adopt a societal perspective because of the ability to integrate diverse factors into the model and the role the public sector plays in HIV prevention and management. This approach incorporates all costs borne by the implementers in recruiting participants for services.
Sources of costing data:
The study will collect data from all study sites using a tool adapted from the Male Circumcision Decision-Makers' Program Planning Tool (DMPPT) for each of the demand creation strategies. The DMPPT was developed by the USAID/Health Policy Initiative in collaboration with UNAIDS to enable decision-makers to understand the potential cost and impact of various options for scaling up male circumcision services. The DMPPT has previously been used to undertake costing of male circumcision services in East and Central Africa. The study shall use this instrument as a data collection tool to estimate the cost of demand creation and the unit cost of providing VMMC (i.e. cost per adult circumcised) in each of the four study arms.
PHASE 5: ESTABLISHING ENDLINE MC PREVALENCE/ESTIMATING IMPACT OF INTERVENTIONS At Endline, the study will review Participant Master Log to identify those who did not go for VMMC at the 45 VMMC clinics participating in the study. The study will use the telephone numbers obtained during enrollment to contact the participants. Those who say that they got circumcised but are not in the Participant Master Log, study staff will make an appointment and visit them at home, or another convenient location, to administer consent, conduct Endline interview and verify their circumcision status. Those who report not having gone for VMMC will be asked why they did not go, and their response recorded.
- Conditions
- HIV/AIDS
- Being tested
- Inter-personal Communication (IPC), Dedicated Service Outlets (DSO)
- Keywords
- Male circumcision, Demand creation
- Medical subject headings
- Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Inter-personal Communication (IPC)Other
RAs will meet older men in their households, and : i) approach the person(s), introduce self, develop rapport and request for time to discuss briefly about VMMC; ii) strike a conversation on reasons why they or their peers have not gone to be circumcised as well as reasons that would make them get circumcised, jotting down responses to guide the discussion; iii) using the 'VMMC Demand Creation Toolkit', discuss each reported barrier/facilitator carefully and completely, always ensuring the person(s) is/are engaged in the discussion (the goal is to pass correct and complete information in a relaxed and conversational manner); iv) revisiting each stated barrier/barrier and exploring what they now think about them after the discussion, and address any new or lingering concerns.
Dedicated Service Outlets (DSO)Other
RAs shall visit every household with eligible men to inform them about the availability of DSO sites in their neighborhoods. After describing the characteristics of DSO sites, the RA will share - both verbally and through a flyer, information on where to find DSO sites in the respective Location. RAs will respond to questions using 'All You Need to Know About VMMC' booklet, the same way current recruiters do. They will also inform potential participants that all other VMMC sites continue to serve all men regardless of age (i.e., including older men) while DSO sites will only serve men aged ≥25 years.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Inter-personal Communication (IPC) | Experimental | Interpersonal communication will entail delivery of intervention massages that are custom-made to address individual participants' specific barriers and facilitators of VMMC. RAs will discuss with uncircumcised men why they have not gone for VMMC using the 'VMMC Demand Creation Toolkit'. The aim will be to fully address their barriers and re-enforce their facilitators. RAS will be trained behavioral counselors, circumcised men, female partners, CHWs, or any other cadre of individuals identified during the formative phase. Receives: Other: Inter-personal Communication (IPC) |
| Dedicated Service Outlets (DSO) | Experimental | RAs shall visit all households with eligible men to inform them about the availability of, and give information on location of DSO sites in the Location. DSOs are sites: where services are offered exclusively to men aged ≥25 years by male service providers in the same age bracket; providing services in the evenings/weekends/designated days of the week, and through special mobile services for older men. DSO sites we will strive to shorten the waiting time to ≤ three hours. They will be informed that all other VMMC sites continue to serve all men regardless of age (i.e., including older men) while DSO sites will only serve men aged ≥25 years. RAs will respond to questions using 'All You Need to Know About VMMC' booklet, the same way current recruiters do. Receives: Other: Dedicated Service Outlets (DSO) |
| Combined IPC & DSO | Experimental | Both Inter-personal Communication (IPC) and Dedicated Service Outlets (DSO) interventions (as described above) will be implemented concurrently. This will be done to determine the effect of both interventions delivered jointly compared to each delivered singly, and compared to no intervention. Receives: Other: Inter-personal Communication (IPC); Other: Dedicated Service Outlets (DSO) |
| Control | No intervention | In these Locations, participants will only be given the 'All You Need to Know About VMMC' booklet at the time of enrollment, which is the standard of care. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The rate of uptake of VMMC services among men in 4 study arms
We will assess the rate of uptake of VMMC services by men aged 25-39 years exposed to (i) Inter-personal communication (IPC) intervention vs. (ii) Designated (older men only) Service Outlets (DSO) intervention vs. (iii) IPC and DSO interventions combined vs. (iv) No intervention.
Measured: Three months post intervention
Secondary outcomes (1)
Prevalence of HIV among VMMC clients who decline HIV testing
Determine HIV prevalence among men in the study target group who refuse routine HIV testing but consent to the testing of unlinked blood sample from bleeding vessels or finger prick.
Measured: Three months post intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2015
- Primary completionJan 2016
- Study completion22 Jan 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (33)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HIV/AIDSStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 2,785 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Impact Research & Development Organization
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Kenya Ministry of Health
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Kawango Agot, Impact Research & Development Organization
- Investigators
- Kawango Agot, PhD, MPH, Principal investigator, Impact Research and Development OrganizationJonathan Grund, MA, MPH, Principal investigator, Centers for Disease Control and PreventionJacob Onyango, Study director, Impact Research and Development Organization
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02497989
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GH000518
- Acronym
- TASCO
- Status last verified
- Mar 2018
- First submitted
- 20 May 2015
- Last updated
- 12 Mar 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Auvert B, Taljaard D, Lagarde E, Sobngwi-Tambekou J, Sitta R, Puren A. Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: the ANRS 1265 Trial. PLoS Med. 2005 Nov;2(11):e298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020298. Epub 2005 Oct 25.
PubMed 16231970Bailey RC, Moses S, Parker CB, Agot K, Maclean I, Krieger JN, Williams CF, Campbell RT, Ndinya-Achola JO. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007 Feb 24;369(9562):643-56. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60312-2.
PubMed 17321310Gray RH, Kigozi G, Serwadda D, Makumbi F, Watya S, Nalugoda F, Kiwanuka N, Moulton LH, Chaudhary MA, Chen MZ, Sewankambo NK, Wabwire-Mangen F, Bacon MC, Williams CF, Opendi P, Reynolds SJ, Laeyendecker O, Quinn TC, Wawer MJ. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2007 Feb 24;369(9562):657-66. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60313-4.
PubMed 17321311Weiss HA, Halperin D, Bailey RC, Hayes RJ, Schmid G, Hankins CA. Male circumcision for HIV prevention: from evidence to action? AIDS. 2008 Mar 12;22(5):567-74. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3282f3f406. No abstract available.
PubMed 18316997Siegfried N, Muller M, Deeks JJ, Volmink J. Male circumcision for prevention of heterosexual acquisition of HIV in men. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;2009(2):CD003362. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003362.pub2.
PubMed 19370585UNAIDS/WHO/SACEMA Expert Group on Modelling the Impact and Cost of Male Circumcision for HIV Prevention. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in high HIV prevalence settings: what can mathematical modelling contribute to informed decision making? PLoS Med. 2009 Sep;6(9):e1000109. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000109. Epub 2009 Sep 8.
PubMed 19901974Weiss HA, Quigley MA, Hayes RJ. Male circumcision and risk of HIV infection in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS. 2000 Oct 20;14(15):2361-70. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200010200-00018.
PubMed 11089625Nagelkerke NJ, Moses S, de Vlas SJ, Bailey RC. Modelling the public health impact of male circumcision for HIV prevention in high prevalence areas in Africa. BMC Infect Dis. 2007 Mar 13;7:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-7-16.
PubMed 17355625Njeuhmeli E, Forsythe S, Reed J, Opuni M, Bollinger L, Heard N, Castor D, Stover J, Farley T, Menon V, Hankins C. Voluntary medical male circumcision: modeling the impact and cost of expanding male circumcision for HIV prevention in eastern and southern Africa. PLoS Med. 2011 Nov;8(11):e1001132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001132. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
PubMed 22140367Bailey RC, Egesah O, Rosenberg S. Male circumcision for HIV prevention: a prospective study of complications in clinical and traditional settings in Bungoma, Kenya. Bull World Health Organ. 2008 Sep;86(9):669-77. doi: 10.2471/blt.08.051482.
PubMed 18797642Rennie S, Muula AS, Westreich D. Male circumcision and HIV prevention: ethical, medical and public health tradeoffs in low-income countries. J Med Ethics. 2007 Jun;33(6):357-61. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.019901.
PubMed 17526688Herman-Roloff A, Otieno N, Agot K, Ndinya-Achola J, Bailey RC. Acceptability of medical male circumcision among uncircumcised men in Kenya one year after the launch of the national male circumcision program. PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19814. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019814. Epub 2011 May 16.
PubMed 21603622Ngalande RC, Levy J, Kapondo CP, Bailey RC. Acceptability of male circumcision for prevention of HIV infection in Malawi. AIDS Behav. 2006 Jul;10(4):377-85. doi: 10.1007/s10461-006-9076-8.
PubMed 16736112Ivers NM, Taljaard M, Dixon S, Bennett C, McRae A, Taleban J, Skea Z, Brehaut JC, Boruch RF, Eccles MP, Grimshaw JM, Weijer C, Zwarenstein M, Donner A. Impact of CONSORT extension for cluster randomised trials on quality of reporting and study methodology: review of random sample of 300 trials, 2000-8. BMJ. 2011 Sep 26;343:d5886. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5886.
PubMed 21948873Marya Plotkin, Hawa Mziray, Jan Küver Judith Prince, et al (2011). Embe Halijamenywa: The unpeeled mango: A Qualitative Assessment of Views and Preferences concerning Voluntary Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision in Iringa Region, Tanzania.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Mar 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Male Circumcision for HIV Prevention in Kenya: Seeking Effective Strategies to Recruit Older Men
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02497989
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TASCO / GH000518
- Conditions
- HIV/AIDS
- Keywords
- Male circumcision, Demand creation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,785 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Impact Research & Development OrganizationUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Kenya Ministry of Health
- Study start
- Feb 2015
- Primary completion
- Jan 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 Jan 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of two interventions - Inter-Personal Communication [IPC] and Dedicated Service Outlets [DSOs] - in recruiting men aged 25-39 years for Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision (VMMC) services.
Detailed description
STUDY AIMS Aim 1: Assess the rate of uptake of VMMC services by men aged 25-39 years exposed to Inter-Personal Communication (IPC) vs. Designated (older men only) Service Outlets (DSO) vs. IPC and DSO interventions combined vs. no intervention.
Aim 2: Determine through testing of unlinked de-identified blood from bleeding vessels from the surgical wound, the proportion of men whose HIV status is unknown who are HIV infected (Sub-study 1).
Aim 3: Determine the cost of providing VMMC among the three interventions relative to each other and to no intervention.
MAIN STUDY DESIGN: The study proposes to conduct a cluster randomized-controlled trial, with Locations forming the unit of randomization. Within the selected Locations, the study shall randomly select approximately 16% (209) of the villages which will be sufficient to generate the required sample size.
Sample size Determination:
Sample size for detecting the impact of the interventions on VMMC uptake - in order to be able demonstrate at least a 33.3 % increase in the rate of VMMC among young adult men in intervention arms when compared to those in control arm with 80% statistical power, and Bonferroni adjusted two-sided α=(0.05/3)=0.017 following the implementation of study interventions, the study will need a sample size of 4,932 men reached with the intervention.
Potential participants to be reached - An effect size equal to 33.3% increase in MC from 30% to 40% will require about 1233 participants per study arm (total 4932), while an effect size equal to 50% increase in VMMC from 30% to 45% will require 573 participants per study arm (total 2292). Adjusting for a refusal rate of 15% and a loss to follow up of 15%, suggests contacting 1603 per study arm resulting in a total of 6412 uncircumcised men aged 25-39 years.
PHASE 1: HOUSEHOLD ENUMERATION To ascertain the size of eligible population (uncircumcised men aged 25-39 years), the study will conduct complete household listing in all selected villages and enumerate male members in each household aged 25-39 years. During this exercise, study staff shall physically visit all homes in the study villages and assign a unique identification number to every household (HIN). Enumeration shall be through home visits ONLY and not by any other means. The unique HIN assigned during the enumeration will be entered on Excel database and households with men aged 25-39 years will be sorted out and put on a separate list. The list will be used to create a database of eligible men in each village. Determining the number of households with eligible men will help in knowing the denominator and in planning for recruitment.
PHASE 2: CONDUCTING RAPID FORMATIVE STUDY (Sub-study 1) Justification: This phase is intended to provide information for use in delivering the interventions. The study have already drafted messages based on existing literature for use in IPC and IPC+DSO intervention Locations/villages. However, since almost all the available information on barriers to and facilitators of VMMC in literature were collected among men of all ages and were not disaggregated by age group, the investigators cannot assume they are automatically relevant to older men. As such, it will still be necessary to conduct a rapid formative study to explore reasons why older men aged 25-39 years go or do not go for VMMC services. Information obtained from this phase will be used to modify if indicated, the messages developed from existing literature.
SUB-STUDY DESIGN: This phase shall comprise of Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) and In-Depth Interviews. Twelve FGDs, with 6-10 participants, will be held with six groups of circumcised men and six groups of uncircumcised men in each of the following age categories: 25-29 years, 30-34 years and 35-39 years. A similar number of FGDs will be held with female partners of circumcised and female partners of uncircumcised men in same age categories.
Besides FGDs, the investigators will conduct 48 IDIs to capture confidential information that some men and women would otherwise not divulge in an FGD setting.
PHASE 3: ESTABLISHING BASELINE VMMC PREVALENCE AND PROPORTION OF ELIGIBLE MEN Based on the eligible participants' list, research assistants will only go back to households with men aged 25 to 39 years. Before administering enrollment consent, RAs will ask participants to identify a private location within or outside the house where they can do consenting and interviewing. The RA will then administer consent for participating in the study, enrol consenting participants and assign Participant Unique ID number.
After assigning the participant unique ID number, the RA will conduct the baseline interview, verify the MC status and inform participants of their intervention arm and deliver the intervention if the participant is available (if not, another visit will be made at a later date to deliver the intervention). During the interview, study staff will document participants' circumcision status from the verbal report. After the interview, participants who consented to physical verification will be asked to choose where this can be performed.
At enrollment, participants will be given 3 months within which to go for circumcision, Participants can go whenever they want for VMMC, but the study will only capture their data if they go within 3 months. They will also be informed that a reminder of the expiry date for circumcision will be sent through text message to all participants one month before the expiry of the circumcision window period.
Details of participants enrolled in the study will be entered into an excel Master Log which will contain all participant details; 3 names, ID number, age, location, village, the telephone number of the participants or of close friend and date of enrollment.
PHASE 4: IMPLEMENTING THE INTERVENTIONS The study has four intervention arms: Inter-Personal Communications (IPC), Dedicated Service Outlets (DSOs), a combination of IPC and DSO (IPC+DSO), and Control. The interventions and how each of them will be implemented are described under 'Protocol arms and interventions' section below.
HIV TESTING OF PARTICIPANTS WITH UNKNOWN HIV STATUS (Sub-study 2) In VMMC program undertaken by Impact Research and Development Organization (IRDO) and in other Kenyan programs as well, between 10% and 30% of men decline HIV testing. Given that VMMC is offered principally as an HIV prevention strategy, it is important to determine the HIV status of those who decline testing, and if the prevalence is significantly higher than those who accept testing, there will be need to design approaches to improve uptake of testing. This is particularly important following results from a recently concluded study that indicated that 44% of HIV-infected men resumed sex before the recommended 6 weeks of sexual abstinence.
Sample size for HIV prevalence among uncircumcised men whose HIV status is unknown (Sub-study 2):
Investigators estimated that they will need to test randomly selected unlinked blood samples from 163 men per arm whose HIV status is unknown in order to estimate a HIV prevalence that falls within 10% points of the true population prevalence with 95% confidence. The study staff will collect samples from all of men who refuse testing but consent to Unlinked HIV testing.
With a refusal rate of 23.6% voluntary HIV testing, and a consenting rate of 60%, then the rate of getting a man who refuses testing but consents to the testing of unlinked blood sample from his bleeding vessels is 14.2%. In other words, of the 4932 participants in the main study, investigators expect 1164 (4932*0.236) to refuse HIV testing. With assumed unlinked HIV testing acceptance rate of 60%, the study can obtain 700 such men from a sample size of 4932 in the main study. For a design effect of 2.5, using a sample size of 700 for the sub-study will enable us to estimate the HIV prevalence of 21.6% with a precision of 4.8%=sqrt[(2.5*1.96^2*.216*.784)/700].
Methods/Procedure:
RAs will perform unlinked testing of blood from bleeding vessels or finger prick of those whose HIV status is unknown. While the call for proposals recommended testing blood from the excised foreskin, investigators are concerned that they may not be able to harvest sufficient blood from most foreskins to perform the test. This is because the forceps-guided method being used in Kenya crushes the foreskin and compresses the blood vessels that supply the distal section. This results in little or no bleeding on the excised foreskin. The study, therefore, propose to only collect blood samples from the bleeding vessels or finger prick from participants (n=700).
COSTING VMMC IN THE CONTEXT OF THE INTERVENTIONS (SUB-STUDY 3) Study Design: Data on costing will be collected across all the study arms. Whereas economic evaluation of service delivery has been conducted in several contexts there is limited information on the cost-effectiveness of various approaches used for recruitment to increase service uptake. The study plan to assess the cost-effectiveness of demand creation for VMMC services based on the three interventions. The results will demonstrate the accrued costs and net savings associated with each intervention strategy.
Methods: The primary outcome of the main study is the incremental change in circumcisions performed attributable to the respective demand creation interventions. Costs will be estimated for primary outcome with reference to the control group, in which the study will continue to provide routine recruitment approaches. This will demonstrate how the costs vary depending on the mode of demand creation.
The study shall adopt a societal perspective because of the ability to integrate diverse factors into the model and the role the public sector plays in HIV prevention and management. This approach incorporates all costs borne by the implementers in recruiting participants for services.
Sources of costing data:
The study will collect data from all study sites using a tool adapted from the Male Circumcision Decision-Makers' Program Planning Tool (DMPPT) for each of the demand creation strategies. The DMPPT was developed by the USAID/Health Policy Initiative in collaboration with UNAIDS to enable decision-makers to understand the potential cost and impact of various options for scaling up male circumcision services. The DMPPT has previously been used to undertake costing of male circumcision services in East and Central Africa. The study shall use this instrument as a data collection tool to estimate the cost of demand creation and the unit cost of providing VMMC (i.e. cost per adult circumcised) in each of the four study arms.
PHASE 5: ESTABLISHING ENDLINE MC PREVALENCE/ESTIMATING IMPACT OF INTERVENTIONS At Endline, the study will review Participant Master Log to identify those who did not go for VMMC at the 45 VMMC clinics participating in the study. The study will use the telephone numbers obtained during enrollment to contact the participants. Those who say that they got circumcised but are not in the Participant Master Log, study staff will make an appointment and visit them at home, or another convenient location, to administer consent, conduct Endline interview and verify their circumcision status. Those who report not having gone for VMMC will be asked why they did not go, and their response recorded.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Inter-personal Communication (IPC) | Experimental | Other: Inter-personal Communication (IPC)Interpersonal communication will entail delivery of intervention massages that are custom-made to address individual participants' specific barriers and facilitators of VMMC. RAs will discuss with uncircumcised men why they have not gone for VMMC using the 'VMMC Demand Creation Toolkit'. The aim will be to fully address their barriers and re-enforce their facilitators. RAS will be trained behavioral counselors, circumcised men, female partners, CHWs, or any other cadre of individuals identified during the formative phase. |
| Dedicated Service Outlets (DSO) | Experimental | Other: Dedicated Service Outlets (DSO)RAs shall visit all households with eligible men to inform them about the availability of, and give information on location of DSO sites in the Location. DSOs are sites: where services are offered exclusively to men aged ≥25 years by male service providers in the same age bracket; providing services in the evenings/weekends/designated days of the week, and through special mobile services for older men. DSO sites we will strive to shorten the waiting time to ≤ three hours. They will be informed that all other VMMC sites continue to serve all men regardless of age (i.e., including older men) while DSO sites will only serve men aged ≥25 years. RAs will respond to questions using 'All You Need to Know About VMMC' booklet, the same way current recruiters do. |
| Combined IPC & DSO | Experimental | Other: Inter-personal Communication (IPC), Other: Dedicated Service Outlets (DSO)Both Inter-personal Communication (IPC) and Dedicated Service Outlets (DSO) interventions (as described above) will be implemented concurrently. This will be done to determine the effect of both interventions delivered jointly compared to each delivered singly, and compared to no intervention. |
| Control | No intervention | –In these Locations, participants will only be given the 'All You Need to Know About VMMC' booklet at the time of enrollment, which is the standard of care. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 25 to 39 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Uncircumcised men
- Aged 25 - 39 years
- Residents of the study village (has been living in the physical structure such as a compound or homestead identified during the enumeration and who has been consuming or making some contribution to food and other shared household resources).
- Intend to continue living in the village for the 9 months after enrollment, which is the estimated duration of data collection.
- Give written consent to participate in the study and the interventions.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Circumcised men
- Aged <25- or >39 years
- Non-resident of target villages
- Plans to move away from the village within 9 months after enrollment
- Does not give consent to participate in the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Inter-personal Communication (IPC)RAs will meet older men in their households, and : i) approach the person(s), introduce self, develop rapport and request for time to discuss briefly about VMMC; ii) strike a conversation on reasons why they or their peers have not gone to be circumcised as well as reasons that would make them get circumcised, jotting down responses to guide the discussion; iii) using the 'VMMC Demand Creation Toolkit', discuss each reported barrier/facilitator carefully and completely, always ensuring the person(s) is/are engaged in the discussion (the goal is to pass correct and complete information in a relaxed and conversational manner); iv) revisiting each stated barrier/barrier and exploring what they now think about them after the discussion, and address any new or lingering concerns. | Other | Combined IPC & DSO, Inter-personal Communication (IPC) |
| Dedicated Service Outlets (DSO)RAs shall visit every household with eligible men to inform them about the availability of DSO sites in their neighborhoods. After describing the characteristics of DSO sites, the RA will share - both verbally and through a flyer, information on where to find DSO sites in the respective Location. RAs will respond to questions using 'All You Need to Know About VMMC' booklet, the same way current recruiters do. They will also inform potential participants that all other VMMC sites continue to serve all men regardless of age (i.e., including older men) while DSO sites will only serve men aged ≥25 years. | Other | Combined IPC & DSO, Dedicated Service Outlets (DSO) |
Primary outcome
The rate of uptake of VMMC services among men in 4 study arms
Time frame: Three months post intervention
We will assess the rate of uptake of VMMC services by men aged 25-39 years exposed to (i) Inter-personal communication (IPC) intervention vs. (ii) Designated (older men only) Service Outlets (DSO) intervention vs. (iii) IPC and DSO interventions combined vs. (iv) No intervention.
1 secondary outcome
Prevalence of HIV among VMMC clients who decline HIV testing
Time frame: Three months post intervention
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Mar 2018.
- Background: PubMed 16231970Auvert B, Taljaard D, Lagarde E, Sobngwi-Tambekou J, Sitta R, Puren A. Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: the ANRS 1265 Trial. PLoS Med. 2005 Nov;2(11):e298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020298. Epub 2005 Oct 25.
- Background: PubMed 17321310Bailey RC, Moses S, Parker CB, Agot K, Maclean I, Krieger JN, Williams CF, Campbell RT, Ndinya-Achola JO. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007 Feb 24;369(9562):643-56. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60312-2.
- Background: PubMed 17321311Gray RH, Kigozi G, Serwadda D, Makumbi F, Watya S, Nalugoda F, Kiwanuka N, Moulton LH, Chaudhary MA, Chen MZ, Sewankambo NK, Wabwire-Mangen F, Bacon MC, Williams CF, Opendi P, Reynolds SJ, Laeyendecker O, Quinn TC, Wawer MJ. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2007 Feb 24;369(9562):657-66. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60313-4.
- Background: PubMed 18316997Weiss HA, Halperin D, Bailey RC, Hayes RJ, Schmid G, Hankins CA. Male circumcision for HIV prevention: from evidence to action? AIDS. 2008 Mar 12;22(5):567-74. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3282f3f406. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 19370585Siegfried N, Muller M, Deeks JJ, Volmink J. Male circumcision for prevention of heterosexual acquisition of HIV in men. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;2009(2):CD003362. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003362.pub2.
- Background: PubMed 19901974UNAIDS/WHO/SACEMA Expert Group on Modelling the Impact and Cost of Male Circumcision for HIV Prevention. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in high HIV prevalence settings: what can mathematical modelling contribute to informed decision making? PLoS Med. 2009 Sep;6(9):e1000109. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000109. Epub 2009 Sep 8.
- Background: PubMed 11089625Weiss HA, Quigley MA, Hayes RJ. Male circumcision and risk of HIV infection in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS. 2000 Oct 20;14(15):2361-70. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200010200-00018.
- Background: PubMed 17355625Nagelkerke NJ, Moses S, de Vlas SJ, Bailey RC. Modelling the public health impact of male circumcision for HIV prevention in high prevalence areas in Africa. BMC Infect Dis. 2007 Mar 13;7:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-7-16.
- Background: PubMed 22140367Njeuhmeli E, Forsythe S, Reed J, Opuni M, Bollinger L, Heard N, Castor D, Stover J, Farley T, Menon V, Hankins C. Voluntary medical male circumcision: modeling the impact and cost of expanding male circumcision for HIV prevention in eastern and southern Africa. PLoS Med. 2011 Nov;8(11):e1001132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001132. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
- Background: PubMed 18797642Bailey RC, Egesah O, Rosenberg S. Male circumcision for HIV prevention: a prospective study of complications in clinical and traditional settings in Bungoma, Kenya. Bull World Health Organ. 2008 Sep;86(9):669-77. doi: 10.2471/blt.08.051482.
- Background: PubMed 17526688Rennie S, Muula AS, Westreich D. Male circumcision and HIV prevention: ethical, medical and public health tradeoffs in low-income countries. J Med Ethics. 2007 Jun;33(6):357-61. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.019901.
- Background: PubMed 21603622Herman-Roloff A, Otieno N, Agot K, Ndinya-Achola J, Bailey RC. Acceptability of medical male circumcision among uncircumcised men in Kenya one year after the launch of the national male circumcision program. PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19814. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019814. Epub 2011 May 16.
Related trials for HIV/AIDS
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Not yet recruiting
Prescribe to Prevent HIV: A Hybrid Trial Helping Addiction Clinics Prevent HIV & Infections Through Safer Drug Use Support
People Who Use Opioids/People With Opioid Use Disorder (OUD)
Recruiting
Evaluating the Impact of Using the B-OK Bottles for HIV and ART Literacy in South Africa
HIV, HIV Treatment
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
RecruitingObservational study
Olfactory Function and Model-Based Behavior in People Living With HIV and SUD
HIV, Substance Use Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kawango Agot, PhD, MPH principal investigator
Impact Research and Development Organization
Jonathan Grund, MA, MPH principal investigator
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Jacob Onyango study director
Impact Research and Development Organization
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Inter-personal Communication (IPC) and Dedicated Service Outlets (DSO) in people with HIV/AIDS, run by Impact Research & Development Organization at 1 site in Kenya.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Kenya. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The rate of uptake of VMMC services among men in 4 study arms (time frame: Three months post intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02497989, which also lists 33 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Mar 2018.