AzTrials
AzTrials

Infant Social WithdrawalCIMHPNCT02497677

Copenhagen Infant Mental Health Project: Enhancing Parental Sensitivity and Attachment (CIMHP)

A study testing Circle of Security -Parenting and Care as Usual in people with Infant Social Withdrawal and Maternal Postnatal Depression, run by University of Copenhagen at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Infant mental health is a significant public health issue as early adversity and expose to childhood stress has life-long consequences for the affected children. Helping families at risk correct their adverse effects on the infant has the potential to halt a negative spiral effect where vulnerable parents fail to cope… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
What is being tested?
Circle of Security -Parenting and Care as Usual
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
314 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
Jul 2015to Dec 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Mother lives in one of the participating three districts of Copenhagen
  • Mother is > 18 years old
  • Mother has an infant in the age of 2-12 months born at term (Gestational age (GA) 37-42) or born preterm (GA 30-36).
  • Mother speaks and understands Danish.
  • Mother is screened positive for symptoms of postnatal depression (EPDS >10) and fulfill criteria for diagnosis of depression assessed in a clinical interview (SCID-5/RV) conducted by a psychologist 10-20 days after EPDS screening AND/OR
  • Infant is scored to be socially withdrawn in two ADBB assessments (ADBB >5) conducted within a range of 10-20 days when the infant is 2, 4 or 8 months.
  • If there is a father/partner this person speaks and understands Danish or English.

Who cannot join

  • Infant autism and/or early retardation
  • Maternal bipolar disorder and/or psychotic disorder, known severe intellectual impairment, suicidal ideation and/or recent suicide attempt and/or present alcohol/substance abuse.
  • Family intends to move away from the Copenhagen area within the period of the intervention.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • UCPH Babylab, University of Copenhagen

    Copenhagen, 1353

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: Copenhagen Infant Mental Health Project: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Circle of Security-Parenting and Care as Usual as Interventions Targeting Infant Mental Healths Risks

Infant mental health is a significant public health issue as early adversity and expose to childhood stress has life-long consequences for the affected children. Helping families at risk correct their adverse effects on the infant has the potential to halt a negative spiral effect where vulnerable parents fail to cope with an at-risk child - which in turn, adds to the child's vulnerability, negatively affects the parents, and so forth. Over a four year period, an estimated 17.600 dyads will be screened in the City of Copenhagen using standardized screening instruments in detecting infant social withdrawal (ADBB) and maternal postnatal depression (EPDS). A sample of 314 eligible parent(s) will enter into a clinical, randomized control trial to test the efficacy of an 8 week group counseling program, Circle of Security Parenting (COS-P) compared to Care as Usual(CAU) in enhancing maternal sensitivity, child attachment and cognitive development. CIMHP is the first large-scale randomized controlled study to test the efficacy of COS-P in promoting parental sensitivity, child attachment and cognitive development in Denmark. Results will provide evidence regarding the efficacy of an American short term indicated parenting group program when implemented in a Scandinavian country.

Read the detailed description

Background and rationale Infant mental health is a significant public health issue as early adversity and exposure to early childhood stress has life-long consequences for these affected children on outcomes such physical and mental health, educational attainment, labor market success and family formation. Infants are - as a result of their dependency, vulnerability and relative social invisibility - more exposed to mental health risks than older children. Infants may be at risk due to a particular biological risk (e.g. infantile autism, retardation, prematurity, physical disabilities etc) or to psycho-social risks in the family (e.g. mentally ill parents, poverty, drug/alcohol abuse etc). Recent Danish estimates suggest that one in five families is at risk of inadequate parenting resources and child neglect.

There is by now solid evidence that the establishment of attachment relationships, i.e. a stable emotional bond with a caregiver - mostly the parent - is one of the most important developmental milestones in infancy. Early parent-child attachment relationships function as a blueprint for future social relationships and serve as a framework within which children learn how to deal with stressful situations and to regulate the accompanying negative emotions. Insecure and disorganized attachment is a significant risk for longitudinal child development and psychopathology, as the ability to regulate ones feelings of stress and negative emotions is important for a wide range of socio-emotional outcomes ranging from social competence, moral development and empathy, to academic achievement. Recent meta-analyses show that insecure and disorganized children have a higher risk of developing mental problems later in life. Insecurely attached children are also more likely than securely attached children to develop internalizing problems, such as anxiety and depressive symptoms, as well as externalizing problems such as aggressive behavior. For externalizing problems, the risk was even higher for disorganized children. Furthermore, research into early brain development indicates that brain development can be physiologically altered by severe stress imposed by neglect and inadequate parenting during a child's early years.

Evidence from attachment research shows that sensitive parenting, where the parent is alert and able to understand the infant's expression of emotional states and able to manage and meet the infant's needs contingently, adequately and in a comforting way will lead to the establishment of a pattern of secure attachment in the child. Lack of availability, inconsistent availability, misunderstanding of the infant's emotional expression and parental behavior that frightens the infant may all lead to an insure attachment and in the most severe cases a disorganized attachment. This is indicative of a breakdown of an organized (secure or insecure) attachment behavioral strategy. Disorganized attachment is considered to be the result of parental behavior that is frightening for the child. An extreme example of such behavior is child maltreatment, but all sorts of parental behavior that are not comprehensible for the child, such as dissociation, which is common in depressed parents, is potentially frightening for the child. This sort of behavior results in the paradoxical situation that the parent is a source of comfort and a source of fear at the same time. Thus, in stress situations the child does not know what to do, and the behavioral strategy collapses .

Infant social withdrawal indicates infant distress and early attachment disturbances and is a known risk factor for infant mental health. Infant social withdrawal is indicated by a lack of either positive (e.g. smiling, eye contact) or negative vocal protestations. Sustained withdrawal behavior in infants can be seen as a chronic diminution of the attachment system, which is gradually generalized into a diminished engagement and lowered reactivity to the environment at large. In more European countries the use of the validated systematic screening method, Alarm Distress Baby Scale (ADBB) for identifying infant delayed socio-emotional development in infant mental health clinics and in home visiting programs have shown promising results.

Postnatal depression (PND) is another known risk for infant mental health. A meta-analysis shows that up to 19% of new mothers may experience minor or major depression during the first months postpartum. If only including major depression, the prevalence was found to be 7.1 %. In a more recent European study, 1,066 women were followed from pregnancy to 12 months postpartum. The results indicated that 9.6% of new mothers may experience a major depressive episode during the first year after delivery. No estimates were given for minor depression. Most cases develop within the first three months with a peak incidence of about 4-6 weeks.

PND has a substantial impact on the mother, her partner, her family, mother-baby interactions and attachment insecurity and the longer term socio-emotional and cognitive development of the baby, especially when depression occurs in the first year of life. Often, mothers suffering from postnatal depression are emotionally, cognitively and/or behaviorally inhibited or impaired in their ability to recognize and react with appropriate "sensitivity" and "responsiveness" to their children's needs. With regard to the infants of these mothers, higher incidences of negative behaviors, such as social withdrawal, persistent crying, averted gaze or head position, physical neediness and a lack of expression of delight in the presence of their mothers, have been observed. These behaviors increase the mother's experience of stress, which further contributes to the maintenance of maladaptive interactional behavioral patterns. Without improvement in these negative interaction cycles, for example, through early interventions, there is a greater likelihood for infants to develop an insecure-avoidant, an insecure ambivalent or disorganized attachment pattern.

Research on the treatment of women with postnatal depression has shown that treatment that only focuses on the mother (i.e., medication, psychotherapy) is insufficient to buffer against the negative impact of maternal psychopathology on the child's cognitive and psychosocial development, as well as infant-mother attachment quality. Even when depression is effectively treated, this does not seem to "spill over" and improve the mother-infant relationship and long-term infant social-emotional outcomes. Instead, it is necessary to support the depressed mothers in their specific needs in caring and relating to their infants,

Interventions targeting PND delivered in groups have been found to achieve change through the dual process of emotional experience and reflection in an interpersonal context. Group sessions provide a support network, reduce isolation and stigma, provide an environment in which to practice interpersonal and communication skills, shape coping strategies and learn from each other, and enable a number of families to be treated at once. Recently, building on evidence from attachment research, a special focus is given to preventive group programs that enhance parental sensitivity and secure attachment such as the intervention program "Circle of Security (COS)". Based on findings from more studies, COS has proved efficient in enhancing secure attachment as well as reducing maternal depressive symptomatology in high-risk samples, including mothers in prison and mentally ill mothers. The original COS program consists of 20 weekly sessions of 2 hour durations and includes an initial video assessment of parent -child attachment. In the COS intervention graphical illustrations of "the Circle of Security" are used. This Circle is a roadmap that encompasses the three basic control systems; the attachment system, the exploration system and the caregiving system. The parent is illustrated through the pair of hands that hold together the child's world. In COS concepts, "holding" means to serve as a secure base and safe haven. "The top half" of the Circle depicts the child's exploration system and needs. I order to explore, the child needs the parent to serve as a secure base by "watching over," "delighting in," "helping," and "enjoying with" the child. Having a parent that supports exploration helps the child develop his or her own sense of interest, leading to mastery and competency in later years. Along "the bottom half" is the child's attachment needs: "protect me," "comfort me," "delight in me," and "organize my feelings." By delighting in the child, the parent helps the child constructing an internal representation of him- of herself as a loved person and thereby establish self-worth, and by organizing the child's feelings by accepting, sharing and naming them, the parent co-regulates the child's emotions and lays the groundwork of later self-regulation of emotions. The child's needs for comfort and exploration encouragement shift rapidly and the caregiver must continuously adjust to those needs, whenever possible.

Meta-analytic evidence identifies short term group approaches (< 16 sessions), targeting maternal sensitivity as being the most effective, and sensitivity focused interventions conducted with referred at-risk samples (e.g. DSM-III-R depressed mothers), as being more effective than interventions with other groups. Attachment security, in particular, has been found to be readily influenced by sensitivity-focused interventions. The program "Circle of Security Parenting" (COS-P) is a recent and shorter version of COS that consists of eight weekly sessions of two hours durations without the individual video assessment of attachment. In COS-P standard video materials of child attachment behaviors as well as the graphic materials to illustrate the Circle of Security are used. Themes that are covered during the program are: "The Circle of Security", "Exploration of the child's needs in the circle", "Being with your child in the circle", "Exploration of own challenges in meeting child's needs", and "Disruption and repair of the relationship".

To the best of the investigator's knowledge, the effectiveness of COS-P in relation to enhancing maternal sensitivity and the mother-infant relationship has not been fully tested in an RCT design in a general population, making this study the first. Results will provide evidence regarding the efficacy of an American short term indicated parenting group program when implemented in a Scandinavian country. Further, COS-P is a promising approach as health nurses can be trained COS-P therapists in future up-scaling.

Being tested
Circle of Security -Parenting, Care as Usual
Keywords
parental sensitivity, child attachment

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Circle of Security -ParentingBehavioural

    Also called COS-P

    The COS-P manual and video material has been translated to Danish (Tryghedscirklen - Forældreprogrammet, manual, Lier, 2013). Based on standard video material of parent-infant interactions, parents are trained to see and understand infant attachment behavior and especially to learn about infant miscuing attachment signals. In the current study parents will attend 10 sessions of 1.5 hour duration

  • Care as UsualBehavioural

    Also called CAU

    CAU are different in the three participating districts and vary in content and duration. All three districts offer (a) group interventions for mothers who experience postnatal depressive symptoms and/or (b) extra counselling home-visits by a health nurse. Number and content of extra home-visits vary in accordance with the families' specific needs, and will rarely exceed 12 extra visits per year.

Study groups in NCT02497677
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Circle of Security-ParentingExperimentalCircle of Security-Parenting (COS-P) is a brief educative group program for parents
Receives: Behavioral: Circle of Security -Parenting
Care as Usual (CAU)Active comparatorCare as usual (CAU) i.e. the active control condition will be standard practices for infants and families at risk in Copenhagen.
Receives: Behavioral: Care as Usual

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Maternal sensitivity

    Maternal sensitivity is observed during five minutes mother-infant interaction (free play), and will be assessed using Coding Interactive behavior (CIB, Feldman, 1998).

    Measured: Assessed at follow-up (infant is 12-16 months)

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Infant-mother attachment quality

    Infant-mother attachment will be assessed by the Strange Situation Procedure( Ainswotrth, 1978) is one of the most well-established indicators of how well or poorly toddlers are functioning in their primary attachment relationship (to mother) with long-term consequences for children's social and emotional adaptation throughout childhood and adolescence.

    Measured: Assessed at follow-up (infant is12-16 months)

  2. Infant Social withdrawal

    Infant Social Withdrawal will be assessed by the Alarm Distress Baby Scale (ADBB, Guedeney \& Fermanian, 2001).

    Measured: Assessed at follow-up (infant is 12-16 months)

  3. Infants socio-emotional development - maternal and partner's report

    A self-report measure administered to both mother and her partner.

    Measured: Assessed at follow-up (infant is 12-16 months)

  4. Infant cognitive and language development

    A standardized test situation by a psychologist using the Bayley III Screener (Pearson, 2008)

    Measured: Assessed at follow-up (infant is 12-16 months)

  5. Maternal Depressive Symptoms

    A self-report measure (EPDS, Cox, Holden \& Sagovsky, 1987).

    Measured: Assessed at follow-up (infant is 12-16 months)

  6. Maternal overall psychological distress

    A self-report measure (SCL-92, Danish version Olsen, Moretnsen \& bech, 2004)

    Measured: Assessed at follow-up (infant is 12-16 months)

  7. Maternal depression diagnosis

    Structural Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Disorders, Research version (First, Williams, Karg \& Spitzer, 2015)

    Measured: Assessed at follow-up (infant is 12-16 months)

  8. Maternal Attachment

    A self-report measure (Experince in Close relationships, ECR, Fraley et al, 2000)

    Measured: Assessed at follow-up (infant is 12-16 months)

  9. Family Functioning, reported by mother and partner

    A self-report measure (The McMaster Family Functioning Device, FAD, Epstein, Baldwin \& Bishop, 1983, Danish version, Thaustum et al, 2009)

    Measured: Assessed at follow-up (infant is 12-16 months)

  10. Parental Reflective Functioning, reported by mother and partner

    self-report measure (The parental reflective Functioning Questionare, PRFQ-1, Luyten et al, 2009)

    Measured: Assessed at follow-up (infant is 12-16 months)

  11. Parental Stress, reported by mother and partner

    A self-report measure (The Parenting Stress Index, third edition, PSI, Abidin, 1990, Danish version, Hogrefe Forlag)

    Measured: Assessed at follow-up (infant is 12-16 months)

  12. Number of extra homes visits by the health nurse

    Reported by the health nurse

    Measured: Assessed at follow-up (infant is 12-16 months)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Jul 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2015
  3. Primary completionJul 2020
  4. Study completionDec 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
314 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02497677
Sponsor's protocol ID
UCPH 2015-10
Acronym
CIMHP
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
7 Jul 2015
Last updated
26 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Smith-Nielsen J, Stove LL, Stuart AC, Jakel J, Egmose I, Rohder K, Wendelboe KI, Vaever MS. Differential effects of the circle of security-parenting programme on infant-mother attachment: The role of infant temperament. Br J Clin Psychol. 2026 Jun;65(2):289-297. doi: 10.1111/bjc.70031. Epub 2025 Dec 18.

    PubMed 41414735
  • Vaever MS, Smith-Nielsen J, Lange T. Copenhagen infant mental health project: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing circle of security -parenting and care as usual as interventions targeting infant mental health risks. BMC Psychol. 2016 Nov 22;4(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s40359-016-0166-8.

    PubMed 27876079

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Circle of Security -Parenting and Care as Usual in people with Infant Social Withdrawal and Maternal Postnatal Depression, run by University of Copenhagen at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Maternal sensitivity (time frame: Assessed at follow-up (infant is 12-16 months)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02497677, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in