AzTrials
AzTrials

Second Degree BurnsNCT02497326

Heparin for the Treatment of Burn Wound Pain

A study testing Polyfax & Lignocain gel or silvazine cream, Topical Heparin and Tramadol in people with Second Degree Burns, run by King Edward Medical University at 1 site in Pakistan.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Pain Associated with partial thickness burns (PTB) is very severe and distressing for the patients.Topical conventional treatment of superficial PTB wounds includes application of polyfax skin ointment plus lignocain gel twice a day after wound wash while deep PTB are treated with silvazine cream twice a day and… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 14 to 60 years
Conditions the study is for
Second Degree Burns
What is being tested?
Polyfax & Lignocain gel or silvazine cream, Topical Heparin and Tramadol
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
36 participants
Where
1 sitePakistan
Study dates
Apr 2015to Dec 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 14 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Either gender with age limits 14-60 years.
  • 2nd degree burn with Total burn surface area (TBSA) <20% (assessed by Wallace rule of nine) including front of chest and abdomen, upper limbs excluding hands and lower limbs excluding foot.
  • Flame and scald burn (on history).

Who cannot join

  • Third degree (painless, lathery eschar with no blanching) and Fourth degree burns (full thickness burn with exposed muscle, tendons or bones) as assessed clinically.
  • Chemical or electrical burn (on history).
  • Personal or family history of hemorrhagic diathesis, heparin intolerance, any medical illness causing bleeding episodes(e.g, Esophageal varices) or active bleeding from any site.
  • History of Liver disease (Total Bilirubin <20umol/L, Alanine amino transferase <36u/L, Aspartate amino transferase <42u/L), or renal disorder (Serum Urea=20-40mg/dl, Serum Creatinine <1.2).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Muhammad M Bashir, F.C.P.S contact

923336517745

mmbashir1@gmail.com

Sobia Manzoor, M.B.B.S contact

+923344094072

drsobiamanzoor@yahoo.com

Pakistan1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Department of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Hospital, King Edward Medical University

    Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000

    Muhammad M Bashir, F.C.P.S, 923336517745, mmbashir1@gmail.com

    Sobia Manzoor, M.B.B.S, +923344094072, drsobiamanzoor@yahoo.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Pakistan

About this study

Official title: Comparative Study of Conventional and Topical Heparin Treatments in Second Degree Burn Patients for Burn Analgesia and Duration of Wound Healing

Pain Associated with partial thickness burns (PTB) is very severe and distressing for the patients.Topical conventional treatment of superficial PTB wounds includes application of polyfax skin ointment plus lignocain gel twice a day after wound wash while deep PTB are treated with silvazine cream twice a day and prepared for grafting if not healed within 3 weeks. Existing conventional therapy is un-comfortable and expensive for the patients. Search continues for a reliable, safe, cheap and effective treatment of burn.Topical use of heparin has been found effective in reducing pain associated with burn wounds. More over use of heparin topically in burn patients is easy to perform and cheap but at the moment, evidence of its effectiveness is weak. Current study is being conducted to verify clinical effectiveness of use of heparin in 2nd degree burns by comparing it with topical conventional treatment.

Read the detailed description

Second degree or partial thickness burn (PTB) is most tricky variety to identify and treat, out of all four categories of burn (based on depth). It is further divided into superficial and deep partial thickness based on the depth of dermal injury. (1) Clinical criteria fulfilling all the points for each category i.e. Superficial PTB (SPTB) being reddish pink, bleed briskly (in <3sec) on pin prick, blanch with brisk return (in <2 sec) on pressure, blister formation and Deep PTB (DPTB) being mottled pink, delayed bleeding (in >3 sec) on pin prick, slow return (in >2 sec) on pressure, no blister, is most commonly used to differentiate both the sub-classes. Pain is hallmark of 2nd degree burns and is treated by topical and IV analgesics. Topical conventional treatment of superficial PTB wounds includes application of polyfax skin ointment plus lignocain gel twice a day after wound wash while deep PTB are treated with silvazine cream twice a day and prepared for grafting by normal saline dressings, if not healed within 3 weeks.

Current treatment for 2nd degree burn is complex, uncomfortable for the patient and expensive for the health systems (2,3) . Search continues for a reliable, safe, cheap and effective treatment of burn. Heparin has been used topically in burn patient and a protocol of topical heparin use has been introduced . It is believed that heparin helps in reducing pain associated with burns and duration of wound healing. (4) It is noted that the mechanism involved in heparin's action on the burn probably derives from its anti-inflammatory and angiogenic properties, stimulating tissue repair and re-epithelializing effects.(2) These actions do not depend on its well-known anticoagulant action. Burn analgesia by heparin is caused by inhibition of pro-inflammatory products which act on free nerve endings and cause pain. In this regard, isolated case reports continue to emerge, suggesting that heparin is able to promote tissue repair and inhibit inflammation in burn patients.(5) It has been shown in a study that out of total 58 patients, those in topical Heparin group demanded less analgesic medications in mg/day (11.83 ± 9.38) than Control group (33.35± 20.63) . It has been reported in another study that heparin applied topically for 5 days in 50 pediatric patients reduced healing time. (6) Indeed there are a number of reports of heparin being used, topically or systemically but there is a lack of effectively controlled studies in this area for clear conclusions to be drawn as to the efficacy of this approach.(7) As it is noted that already existing conventional therapy is un-comfortable and expensive for the patients, use of heparin topically in burn patients is easy to perform and cheap but at the moment, evidence of its effectiveness is weak. So rationale of the study is to verify clinical effectiveness of use of heparin in 2nd degree burns.

Objective:- To compare conventional treatment and topical heparin treatment in 2nd degree burn patients in terms of total consumption of analgesic medication and duration of wound healing.

Being tested
Polyfax & Lignocain gel or silvazine cream, Topical Heparin, Tramadol
Keywords
second degree burns, heparin, topical

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Polyfax & Lignocain gel or silvazine creamDrug

    olyfax skin ointment plus Lignocain gel will be applied on superficial PTB area and silver sulphadiazine cream on deep PTB in morning and evening after wound wash.

  • Topical HeparinDrug

    Heparin solution (5000 IU/ml) will be sprinkled aseptically on burn surface twice a day for the first 2 days, by "#27" needle connected via drip set to the drip containing heparin aqueous saline. The dose will be reduced to 75% of day 1 on day 3 and 4 and to 50% on day 5. Administration of heparin saline solution will be in 3 cycles with 5-10 minutes interval

  • TramadolDrug

    IV Analgesic ( Inj. Tramadol 10mg/dose) will only be given to the patients (in both groups) having pain score >4, assessed 3 times a day by Numeric Visual Analogue scale (NVAS).

Study groups in NCT02497326
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Polyfax & Lignocain gel or silvazine creamActive comparatorPolyfax skin ointment plus Lignocain gel will be applied on superficial PTB area and silver sulphadiazine cream on deep PTB in morning and evening after wound wash
Receives: Drug: Polyfax & Lignocain gel or silvazine cream; Drug: Tramadol
Topical heparinExperimentalHeparin solution (5000 IU/ml) will be sprinkled aseptically on burn surface twice a day for the first 2 days, by "#27" needle connected via drip set to the drip containing heparin aqueous saline. The dose will be reduced to 75% of day 1 on day 3 and 4 and to 50% on day 5. Administration of heparin saline solution will be in 3 cycles with 5-10 minutes interval.
Receives: Drug: Topical Heparin; Drug: Tramadol

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Total consumption of Analgesic Medication

    Total consumption of Analgesic Medication will be calculated as total of the amount of IV analgesics required (mg/day) by patient, for the first 5 days of treatment, taking day of admission as "day 0". IV Analgesic ( Inj. Tramadol 10mg/dose) will only be given to the patients having pain score >4, assessed 3 times a day by Numeric Visual Analogue scale (NVAS).

    Measured: 5 days

  2. Duration of wound healing

    Duration of Wound Healing in SPTB will be assessed by

    1. Noting down the days required for the wound to re-epithelialize ≥70% . The number of day when ≥70% re-epithelialization has occured in SPTB will be noted taking day of starting treatment as 'day zero'

    Measured: From date of staring treatment until the date when ≥70% re-epithelialization of SPTB has occured upto 21 days

  3. Duration of wound healing

    Duration of Wound Healing in DPTB will be assessed by noting down days required for the wound to be ready for grafting in taking day 21 after staring treatment as "day 0" Wound will said to be ready for skin grafting if completely (100%) covered by granulation tissue with epithelialized margins.

    Measured: Date on Twenty first day after starting treatment untill the date when DPTB ready for skin grafting

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Jul 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2015
  3. Primary completionDec 2015 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2015 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
36 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02497326
Sponsor's protocol ID
84/RC/KEMU
Status last verified
Jul 2015
First submitted
7 Jul 2015
Last updated
14 Jul 2015
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Klein MB. Thermal,chemical and electrical injuries In:Thorne CH et al.(ed.)Grabb and Smith's plastic surgery.7th ed. Philadelphia,Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;2014. p128 - 129. ISBN 978-1-4511-0955-9.

  • Barretto MG, Costa Mda G, Serra MC, Afiune JB, Praxedes HE, Pagani E. [Comparative study of conventional and topical heparin treatments for burns analgesia]. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2010 Jan-Feb;56(1):51-5. doi: 10.1590/s0104-42302010000100016. Portuguese.

    PubMed 20339787
  • Klein MB, Hollingworth W, Rivara FP, Kramer CB, Askay SW, Heimbach DM, Gibran NS. Hospital costs associated with pediatric burn injury. J Burn Care Res. 2008 Jul-Aug;29(4):632-7. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31817db951.

    PubMed 18535469
  • Saliba MJ Jr. Heparin in the treatment of burns 2011". http://www.salibaburnsinstitute.org/ PROTOCOL.html.

  • Ferreira Chacon JM, Mello de Andrea ML, Blanes L, Ferreira LM. Effects of topical application of 10,000 IU heparin on patients with perineal dermatitis and second-degree burns treated in a public pediatric hospital. J Tissue Viability. 2010 Nov;19(4):150-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2010.03.003. Epub 2010 Apr 20.

    PubMed 20409713
  • Venkatachalapathy TS. A comparative study of paediatric thermal burns treated with topical heparin and without heparin. Indian J Surg. 2014 Aug;76(4):282-7. doi: 10.1007/s12262-012-0674-6. Epub 2012 Oct 5.

    PubMed 25278651
  • Oremus M, Hanson MD, Whitlock R, Young E, Archer C, Dal Cin A, Gupta A, Raina P. A systematic review of heparin to treat burn injury. J Burn Care Res. 2007 Nov-Dec;28(6):794-804. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181599b9b.

    PubMed 17925636

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Polyfax & Lignocain gel or silvazine cream, Topical Heparin and Tramadol in people with Second Degree Burns, run by King Edward Medical University at 1 site in Pakistan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jul 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Muhammad M Bashir, F.C.P.S (923336517745, mmbashir1@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Total consumption of Analgesic Medication (time frame: 5 days). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02497326, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jul 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in