Prolonged Air LeakPhase 3NCT02491671
Effectiveness Novel Tissue Sealant, Prevention Prolonged Air Leak (PAL) After Lung Resection
A Phase 3 study testing Hemopatch and standard preventive measures in people with Prolonged Air Leak and Lung Resection, run by Fundación Instituto de Estudios de Ciencias de la Salud de Castilla y León at 6 sites in Spain.
Trial summary
The effectiveness of tissue sealants to prevent Prolonged Air Leak (PAL) after lung resection procedures remains unproved. The investigators hypothesize that one of the main reasons for that is the heterogeneity of previously studied populations. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Prolonged Air Leak, Lung Resection
- What is being tested?
- Hemopatch and standard preventive measures
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 260 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesSpain
- Study dates
- 24 Nov 2015to 30 Jun 2019
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Scheduled anatomical lung resection indicated for any non-infectious disease (excluding Pneumonectomy)
- Patients classified in class D according estimated risk of PAL
- Age between 18 and 80 years
Who cannot join
- Those patients that according to Investigator assessment are not going to tolerate the procedure
- Clinical and anesthetic criteria that contraindicate surgery
- Severe uncontrolled illness
- Pregnancy
- Patients that are under Investigational New Drug treatment or have participated in study with a investigational drug (authorized or not) in 30 days before randomization.
- Lack of Informed Consent or patient refusal
- Postsurgery mechanical ventilation or repeated surgery in follow-up month.
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 1 country.
6 sites in 1 country
Spain6 sites
Hospital Clinic
Barcelona, 08036
Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal de Madrid
Madrid, 28034
Hospital Clínico San Carlos
Madrid, 28040
Hospital Universitario de Salamanca (CAUSA)
Salamanca, 37007
Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla de Santander
Santander, Cantabria, 39008
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
Seville, 41013
About this study
Official title: Prospective, Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized, Phase III Clinical Trial of Prevention of Prolonged Air Leak After Lung Resection in High-risk Patients, Applying HEMOPATCH®
The effectiveness of tissue sealants to prevent Prolonged Air Leak (PAL) after lung resection procedures remains unproved. The investigators hypothesize that one of the main reasons for that is the heterogeneity of previously studied populations. Since currently the risk of postoperative PAL can be scored with a reasonable accuracy, the aim of this research is to investigate the effect of routine application of a novel tissue sealant in patients selected on the basis of a high risk of PAL estimated before surgery.
- Conditions
- Prolonged Air Leak, Lung Resection
- Being tested
- Hemopatch, standard preventive measures
- Keywords
- Prevention PAL Prolonged Air Leak (PAL), Lung Resection, Thoracic Surgery, Post-operative Thoracic Air Leak
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HemopatchDevice
standard preventive measuresProcedure or surgery
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | Experimental | Experimental group: At the end of lung resection, lung sutures and 1.5 cm of lung parenchyma on each side will be covered by Hemopatch. No additional measures for preventing air leak will be indicated. In the case of massive air leak in spite of the use of Hemopatch, each surgeon will decide on the indication of additional sutures of tissue plasties. These cases will be accounted for failures on an intention to treat basis. Receives: Device: Hemopatch; Procedure: standard preventive measures |
| Control group | Other | Control group: The standard preventive measures will be followed in each center, including reinforcement of sutures, pleural tents, suturing pericardial or subcutaneous fat Receives: Procedure: standard preventive measures |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Prolonged Air Leak (PAL)
Prevalence of Prolonged Air Leak (PAL) measured as binary variable (YES/NO) and recorded, from day of surgery to the fifth postoperative day, in the study questionnaire. The occurrence of the outcome will be recorded if air leak exists 5 days or more after surgery
Measured: From day of surgery to the fifth postoperative day
Secondary outcomes (3)
Duration of Air Leaks
Measured as continuous variable (days) and recorded, from day of surgery to the day of withdraw the chest tube. (standardized criteria for pulling out chest drainage/s will be agreed among investigators)
Measured: Check everyday from day of surgery up to 38 days post-operative at maximum
Number of Participants With at Least One Chest Tube Reinsertion
Rate of patients needing postoperative reinsertion of chest drainages due to symptomatic pneumothorax. Following daily during hospital stay and pone follow-up until 30th day post-operative.
Measured: From day of surgery up to 30 days thereafter
Number of Participants With One or More Readmission
Rate of readmissions due to relapsing pneumothorax (follow-up 30 days)
Measured: 30 days post-operative
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Study start24 Nov 2015
- Primary completion30 Jun 2019
- Study completion30 Jun 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Prolonged Air LeakStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 260 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fundación Instituto de Estudios de Ciencias de la Salud de Castilla y León
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca, Baxter Healthcare Corporation
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Gonzalo Varela, MD PhD FETCS, Study director, IBSAL-Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02491671
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HEMOPATCH/FAP/2014
- Status last verified
- Aug 2021
- First submitted
- 10 Jun 2015
- Last updated
- 9 Aug 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Aug 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective, Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized, Phase III Clinical Trial of Prevention of Prolonged Air Leak After Lung Resection in High-risk Patients, Applying HEMOPATCH®
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02491671
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HEMOPATCH/FAP/2014
- Conditions
- Prolonged Air Leak, Lung Resection
- Keywords
- Prevention PAL Prolonged Air Leak (PAL), Lung Resection, Thoracic Surgery, Post-operative Thoracic Air Leak
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 260 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Fundación Instituto de Estudios de Ciencias de la Salud de Castilla y LeónUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca, Baxter Healthcare Corporation
- Study start
- 24 Nov 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 27 Jul 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The effectiveness of tissue sealants to prevent Prolonged Air Leak (PAL) after lung resection procedures remains unproved. The investigators hypothesize that one of the main reasons for that is the heterogeneity of previously studied populations. Since currently the risk of postoperative PAL can be scored with a reasonable accuracy, the aim of this research is to investigate the effect of routine application of a novel tissue sealant in patients selected on the basis of a high risk of PAL estimated before surgery.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | Experimental | Device: Hemopatch, Procedure: standard preventive measuresExperimental group: At the end of lung resection, lung sutures and 1.5 cm of lung parenchyma on each side will be covered by Hemopatch. No additional measures for preventing air leak will be indicated. In the case of massive air leak in spite of the use of Hemopatch, each surgeon will decide on the indication of additional sutures of tissue plasties. These cases will be accounted for failures on an intention to treat basis. |
| Control group | Other | Procedure: standard preventive measuresControl group: The standard preventive measures will be followed in each center, including reinforcement of sutures, pleural tents, suturing pericardial or subcutaneous fat |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Scheduled anatomical lung resection indicated for any non-infectious disease (excluding Pneumonectomy)
- Patients classified in class D according estimated risk of PAL
- Age between 18 and 80 years
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Those patients that according to Investigator assessment are not going to tolerate the procedure
- Clinical and anesthetic criteria that contraindicate surgery
- Severe uncontrolled illness
- Pregnancy
- Patients that are under Investigational New Drug treatment or have participated in study with a investigational drug (authorized or not) in 30 days before randomization.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Hemopatch | Device | Experimental group |
| standard preventive measures | Procedure or surgery | Control group, Experimental group |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Prolonged Air Leak (PAL)
Time frame: From day of surgery to the fifth postoperative day
Prevalence of Prolonged Air Leak (PAL) measured as binary variable (YES/NO) and recorded, from day of surgery to the fifth postoperative day, in the study questionnaire. The occurrence of the outcome will be recorded if air leak exists 5 days or more after surgery
3 secondary outcomes
Duration of Air Leaks
Time frame: Check everyday from day of surgery up to 38 days post-operative at maximum
Number of Participants With at Least One Chest Tube Reinsertion
Time frame: From day of surgery up to 30 days thereafter
Number of Participants With One or More Readmission
Time frame: 30 days post-operative
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Aug 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Prolonged Air Leak
Not yet recruiting
A Study Comparing ETHICON™ 4000 Stapler System With Standard of Care Stapling Devices in Adults Undergoing Gastric and Thoracic Procedures
Surgical Procedures, Operative
Enrolling by invitation
Prolonged Air Leak (PAL) Autologous Blood Patch Intervention Trial
Lung Cancer
Recruiting
Comparison of 40% Glucose Solution and Autologous Blood Patch Pleurodesis for Postoperative Air Leak After Lung Resections
Prolonged Air Leak, Persistent Air Leak
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Reinforced and Non-Reinforced Staple Lines in Fissureless Lobectomy
Lung, Lung Adenocarcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gonzalo Varela, MD PhD FETCS study director
IBSAL-Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca
6 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Hemopatch and standard preventive measures in people with Prolonged Air Leak and Lung Resection, run by Fundación Instituto de Estudios de Ciencias de la Salud de Castilla y León at 6 sites in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Aug 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Jul 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Prolonged Air Leak (PAL) (time frame: From day of surgery to the fifth postoperative day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Aug 2021.