AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseACOSNCT02488590

Systematic Approach for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Obstructive Lung Diseases

An observational study of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Asthma, run by KU Leuven at 1 site in Belgium.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The differential diagnosis of asthma and COPD is sometimes difficult. Recently, an overlap syndrome has been defined based on the concurrence of asthma and COPD characteristics. These characteristics are based on expert opinions and have never been investigated nor validated prospectively. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 30 to 80 years
What is being tested?
LABA + LAMA, ICS and LABA + LAMA + ICS
How many people
180 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
Jul 2015to Jul 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 30 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: All patients of Caucasian descent, ageing 30-80 years and presenting for the first time at the outpatient pulmonary clinic of the University Hospitals Leuven with respiratory symptoms

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects with respiratory symptoms suggestive of chronic airway disease

Who cannot join

  • Subjects with an immediate need for hospitalization or a treatment of systemic glucocorticoid or long-term antibiotics
  • Subjects with pregnancy
  • Subjects with clinically significant cardiovascular disease that warrants intervention
  • Subject with concomitant pulmonary diseases (pulmonary embolism, interstitial lung disease etc..).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • UZ Gasthuisberg

    Leuven, Flanders, 3000

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

The differential diagnosis of asthma and COPD is sometimes difficult. Recently, an overlap syndrome has been defined based on the concurrence of asthma and COPD characteristics. These characteristics are based on expert opinions and have never been investigated nor validated prospectively.

The investigators assume that the management strategy, the symptom burden and disease progression will differ between asthma, COPD and ACOS. Therefore, the study wants to establish baseline criteria for an appropriate disease definition and evaluate the potential impact on treatment and symptom control.

Read the detailed description

This study aims to test a diagnostic algorithm for obstructive airways diseases that may be used in daily practice to obtain a correct differential diagnosis and, hence, initiate an adequate therapy according to the current guidelines. The proposed algorithm will be used to categorize patients in 4 different diagnoses with specific treatment choices: asthma, obstructive asthma, overlap asthma with COPD, and COPD. The study will evaluate which tests and criteria contribute most to the diagnostic work-up and final diagnosis.

Test battery for diagnosis

  • spirometry with bronchodilator reversibility testing
  • bodyplethysmography: spirometry, volumes, resistance, diffusing capacity
  • exhaled NO
  • blood sample
  • CT scan of thorax (only when obstructive spirometry)
  • histamine challenge (only when spirometry is not obstructive)
  • induced sputum (not for protocol interpretation)

Definition of endpoints

  1. Physician based diagnosis: diagnosis based on clinical exam and spirometry
  2. Algorithm based diagnosis: diagnosis based on clinical exam and test battery
  3. Final standard diagnosis diagnosis based on clinical exam, test battery and clinical evolution of 1 year.
Being tested
LABA + LAMA, ICS, LABA + LAMA + ICS, LABA + ICS, other
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Asthma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • LABA + LAMADrug

    Also called dual bronchodilation

    An open label inhaled therapy is initiated once the diagnosis has been set based on clinical and testing criteria (algorithm). The treatment may be changed in function of the clinical evolution, which is left at the discretion of the general practitionar. Changes in treatment and treatment doses are registered during 1 year follow-up.

  • ICSDrug

    Also called inhaled cortiscosteroids

    An open label inhaled therapy is initiated once the diagnosis has been set based on clinical and testing criteria (algorithm). The treatment may be changed in function of the clinical evolution, which is left at the discretion of the general practitionar. Changes in treatment and treatment doses are registered during 1 year follow-up.

  • LABA + LAMA + ICSDrug

    Also called triple therapy

    An open label inhaled therapy is initiated once the diagnosis has been set based on clinical and testing criteria (algorithm). The treatment may be changed in function of the clinical evolution, which is left at the discretion of the general practitionar. Changes in treatment and treatment doses are registered during 1 year follow-up.

  • LABA + ICSDrug

    Also called bronchodilator inhaled corticosteroid fixed combinations

    An open label inhaled therapy is initiated once the diagnosis has been set based on clinical and testing criteria (algorithm). The treatment may be changed in function of the clinical evolution, which is left at the discretion of the general practitionar. Changes in treatment and treatment doses are registered during 1 year follow-up.

  • otherDrug

    Also called no inhalation therapy

    An open label therapy or no therapy is initiated once the diagnosis has been set based on clinical and testing criteria (algorithm). The treatment may be changed in function of the clinical evolution, which is left at the discretion of the general practitionar. Changes in treatment and treatment doses are registered during 1 year follow-up.

Study groups in NCT02488590
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASEPatients with an obstructive spirometry and characteristics of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Clinical intervention: Long acting B agonist (LABA) + Long acting muscarinic receptor antagonist (LAMA) inhaled therapy
Receives: Drug: LABA + LAMA
ASTHMApatients with asthma and a normal spirometry Clinical intervention: Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)
Receives: Drug: ICS
ASTHMA COPD OVERLAP SYNDROMEpatients with an obstructive spirometry and characteristics of both COPD and Asthma Clinical Intervention: LABA + LAMA + ICS
Receives: Drug: LABA + LAMA + ICS
OBSTRUCTIVE ASTHMApatients with an obstructive spirometry and characteristics of asthma Clinical Intervention: LABA + ICS inhaled therapy
Receives: Drug: LABA + ICS
OTHERpatients with another diagnosis or healthy persons clinical Intervention: undefined - according to diagnosis
Receives: Drug: other

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Accuracy of the proposed diagnostic algorithm

    % changes of algorithm diagnosis compared to physician based diagnosis (based on spirometry only)

    Measured: after work-up at inclusion (at baseline)

  2. Accuracy of the proposed diagnostic algorithm (at one year follow-up)

    % changes of algorithm diagnosis compared to final diagnosis (based on all tests with clinical evolution for 1 year))

    Measured: at one year

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Difference in ACT/CAT-scores

    Difference of ACT/CAT-score between arms at 3 months

    Measured: 3 months

  2. Difference in ACT/CAT-scores

    Difference of ACT/CAT-scores between arms at 1 year

    Measured: 1 year

  3. Difference in Delta ACT/CAT scores (0 - 3 months)

    Difference of delta ACT/CAT-scores (0 - 3 months) between arms

    Measured: 3 months

  4. Difference in Delta ACT/CAT scores (0 - 1 year)

    Difference of delta ACT/CAT-scores (0 - 1 year) between arms

    Measured: 1 year

  5. specificity and sensitivity of individual criteria for final diagnosis

    ROC curve analysis for individual criteria in predicting final diagnosis

    Measured: 1 year

  6. independency of criteria for final diagnosis

    Logistic regression analysis for criteria in predicting final diagnosis

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Jul 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2015
  3. Primary completionApr 2020
  4. Study completionJul 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
180 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02488590
Sponsor's protocol ID
S57767
Acronym
ACOS
Status last verified
Apr 2020
First submitted
29 Jun 2015
Last updated
8 Apr 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Asthma, run by KU Leuven at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Accuracy of the proposed diagnostic algorithm (time frame: after work-up at inclusion (at baseline)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Apr 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in