SchizophreniaPhase 2NCT02477670
Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of AVP-786 for the Treatment of Residual Schizophrenia
A Phase 2 study testing AVP-786 in people with Schizophrenia, run by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. at 17 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The objectives of this 12-week study are to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of AVP-786 as an adjunctive treatment compared with placebo in patients with residual schizophrenia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Schizophrenia
- What is being tested?
- AVP-786
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 145 participants
- Where
- 17 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2015to 21 Jul 2017
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients who meet DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia using the M.I.N.I. version 6.0.
- Patients must meet PANSS criteria
- Patients currently receiving atypical antipsychotics are eligible provided they are on a stable dose
Who cannot join
- Patients with current major depressive disorder (MDD)
- Patients with extrapyramidal syndrome secondary to their ongoing antipsychotic medication
- Patients currently using anticholinergic medications
- Recent in-patient hospitalization
Trial locations and contacts
17 sites in 1 country.
17 sites in 1 country
United States17 sites
Study site
Atlanta, Georgia
Study site
Augusta, Georgia
Study site
Boston, Massachusetts
Study site
Cerritos, California
Study site
Chicago, Illinois
Study site
Garden Grove, California
Study site
Grand Rapids, Michigan
Study site
Jamaica, New York
Study site
Marlton, New Jersey
Study site
National City, California
Study site
New York, New York
Study site
Oakland, California
Study site
Orlando, Florida
Study site
Rochester, New York
Study site
San Diego, California
Study site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia
Study site
Worcester, Massachusetts
About this study
Official title: A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Sequential Parallel Comparison Design (SPCD) Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of AVP-786 (Deuterated [d6]-Dextromethorphan Hydrobromide [d6-DM]/Quinidine Sulfate [Q]) as an Adjunctive Treatment for Patients With Residual Schizophrenia
The objectives of this 12-week study are to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of AVP-786 as an adjunctive treatment compared with placebo in patients with residual schizophrenia.
- Conditions
- Schizophrenia
- Being tested
- AVP-786, Placebo
- Keywords
- Negative Symptoms, Schizophrenia, AVP-786
- Medical subject headings
- Schizophrenia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AVP-786Drug
PlaceboDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Placebo capsules administered twice a day over a 12-week period Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| AVP-786 | Experimental | AVP-786 dose 2 capsules administered twice a day over a 12-week period Receives: Drug: AVP-786 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in the 16-Item Negative Symptom Assessment (NSA-16) Total Score at Week 6 and Week 12
The NSA-16 is a measure of the presence, severity, and range of negative symptoms associated with schizophrenia. It has a high interrater and test-retest reliability across languages and cultures. The NSA-16 uses a 5-factor model to describe negative symptoms: (1) communication, (2) emotion/affect, (3) social involvement, (4) motivation, and (5) retardation. The possible NSA-16 total score ranges from 16 to 96, with a higher score indicating a worse condition. Change was Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Secondary outcomes (29)
Change From Baseline in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Week 6 and Week 12
The PANSS is a 30-item clinical scale that is extensively used as a reliable and valid measure for negative symptom trials. The PANNS consists of 6 subscales: positive subscale; negative subscale; general psychopathology subscale; prosocial factors (active social avoidance, emotional withdrawal, passive/apathetic social withdrawal, stereotyped thinking, hallucinatory behavior, suspiciousness/persecution); Marder negative factors (blunted affect, emotional withdrawal, poor rapport, passive/apathetic social withdrawal, lack of spontaneity and flow of conversation, motor retardation, active social avoidance); excitement component (excitement, hostility, tension, uncooperativeness, poor impulse control). Each item was scored from "1" (absent) to "7" (extremely severe). The PANSS total score ranges from 30 to 210, with a higher score indicating greater severity of symptoms. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the PANSS Negative Subscale Score at Week 6 and Week 12
The negative subscale includes items N1 - N7 in the PANSS. Each item was scored from "1" (absent) to "7" (extremely severe). The score ranges from 7 to 49, with higher scores indicative of greater severity of the negative symptoms. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.
Measured: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the PANSS Marder Negative Factor Score at Week 6 and Week 12
The Marder negative factors comprise 7 items of the PANSS: N1 (blunted affect); N2 (emotional withdrawal); N3 (poor rapport); N4 (passive/apathetic social withdrawal); N6 (lack of spontaneity and flow of conversation); G7 (motor retardation), and G16 (active social avoidance). Each item is scored from "1" (absent) to "7" (extremely severe). The score ranges from 7 to 49, with higher scores indicative of greater severity of the negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the PANSS Prosocial Factor Subscale Score at Week 6 at Week 12
The prosocial factors include items: G16 (active social avoidance); N2 (emotional withdrawal); N4 (passive/apathetic social withdrawal); N7 (stereotyped thinking); P3 (hallucinatory behavior); and P6 (suspiciousness/persecution) in the PANSS. Each item was scored from "1" (absent) to "7" (extremely severe). The score ranges from 6 to 42, with higher scores indicative of greater severity of the specific negative symptoms. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the PANSS Positive Subscale Score at Week 6 and Week 12
The positive subscale includes items P1 - P7 in the PANSS. Each item is scored from "1" (absent) to "7" (extremely severe). The score ranges from 7 to 49, with higher scores indicative of greater severity of the positive symptoms of schizophrenia. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the PANSS General Psychopathology Subscale Score at Week 6 and Week 12
The general psychopathology subscale includes items G1 - G16 in the PANSS. Each item was scored from "1" (absent) to "7" (extremely severe). The score ranges from 16 to 112, with higher scores indicative of greater severity of symptoms of schizophrenia. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the PANSS Excitement Component Subscale Score at Week 6 and Week 12
The excitement component includes items: P4 (excitement); P7 (hostility); G4 (tension); G8 (uncooperativeness); and G14 (poor impulse control). Each item is scored from "1" (absent) to "7" (extremely severe). The score ranges from 5 to 35, with higher scores indicative of greater severity of symptoms. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the NSA-16 Communication Domain Score at Week 6 and Week 12
NSA-16 Communication Factor Domain scores range from 4 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater clinical severity of symptoms. Negative values indicate improvement. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the NSA-16 Emotion/Affect Domain Score at Week 6 and Week 12
NSA-16 Emotion/Affect Domain scores range from 3 to 18, with higher scores indicating a greater clinical severity of symptoms. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the NSA-16 Social Involvement Domain Score at Week 6 and Week 12
NSA-16 Social Involvement Factor Domain scores range from 3 to 18, with higher scores indicating greater clinical severity of symptoms. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the NSA-16 Motivation Domain Score at Week 6 and Week 12
NSA-16 Motivation Factor Domain scores range from 4 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater clinical severity of symptoms. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the NSA-16 Retardation Domain Score at Week 6 at Week 12
NSA-16 Retardation Factor Domain scores range from 3 to 18, with higher scores indicating greater clinical severity of symptoms. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the NSA-16 Global Negative Symptoms Score at Week 6 and Week 12
The global negative symptoms rating in the NSA-16 is a single score based on the overall impression of severity of negative symptoms on a 1 to 7 scale, where higher scores indicate greater severity. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the NSA-16 Global Level of Functioning Score at Week 6 and Week 12
The global level of functioning is a single score on a scale of 1 to 7 that provides the overall assessment of the participant's level of functioning, with higher scores indicative of severe impairment in functioning. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) Composite Score at Week 6 and Week 12
The MCCB is the standard tool for assessing cognitive change in trials of cognitive-enhancing agents in schizophrenia and is used to provide a relatively brief evaluation of key cognitive domains relevant to schizophrenia and related disorders. It is made up of 10 tests that measure 7 cognitive domains: Speed of Processing; Attention/Vigilance; Working Memory; Verbal Learning; Visual Learning; Reasoning and Problem Solving; and Social Cognition. The MCCB was to be conducted at approximately the same time of day (+/- 2 hours) and preferably in the morning. The MCCB composite score ranges from 0 to 70, with higher scores indicative of less severe cognition symptoms. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Mean Actual Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) of Illness Score at Week 6 and Week 12
The CGI is an assessment of a participant's global functioning prior to and after initiating study medication and provides an overall clinician-determined summary measure that takes into account knowledge of the participant's history, psychosocial circumstances, symptoms, behavior, and the impact of the symptoms on the participant's ability to function. It is based on a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the participant's illness at the time of assessment, relative to the clinician's past experience with participants who have the same diagnosis. Considering the total clinical experience, a participant is assessed on severity of mental illness at the time of rating: 1 (normal, not at all ill); 2 (borderline mentally ill); 3 (mildly ill); 4 (moderately ill); 5 (markedly ill); 6 (severely ill); or 7 (among the most extremely ill participants). Scores range from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicative of greater severity of illness.
Measured: Week 6 (Stage 1); Week 12 (Stage 2)
Mean Actual Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Score at Week 6 and Week 12
The CGI is an assessment of the participant's global functioning prior to and after initiating a study medication and provides an overall clinician-determined summary measure that takes into account all available information, including knowledge of the participant's history, psychosocial circumstances, symptoms, behavior, and the impact of the symptoms on the participant's ability to function. It is based on a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to rate the change of the participant's condition at the time of assessment, relative to the clinician's past experience with the participant's condition at admission. Considering the total clinical experienced, a participant is assessed for change of mental illness as: 1 (very much improved); 2 (much improved); 3 (minimally improved); 4 (no change); 5 (minimally worse); 6 (much worse); or 7 (very much worse). Scores range from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicative of greater severity of illness.
Measured: Baseline, Week 6 (Stage 1), Week 12 (Stage 2)
Mean Actual Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Week 6 at Week 12
The PGI-C is a 7-point, participant-rated scale used to assess treatment response as: 0=Not assessed; 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally 6=worse; or 7=very much worse. Week 6 and Week 12 scores are relative to Stage 1 Baseline.
Measured: Baseline, Week 6 (Stage 1), Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total Score at Week 6 and Week 12
The CDSS is a 9-item scale derived from the Hamilton Depression Scale (Ham-D) that is designed to assess depression specifically in participants with schizophrenia. Unlike the Ham-D, the CDSS does not contain depressive symptoms that overlap with negative symptoms of schizophrenia, such as anhedonia and social withdrawal. Each item on the scale is scored as: 0 (absent); 1 (mild); 2 (moderate); or 3 (severe). The CDSS is obtained by adding each of the item scores. A score above 6 has an 82% specificity and 85% sensitivity for predicting the presence of a major depressive episode. The CDSS score ranges from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicative of severe symptoms of depression. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the Effort Expenditure for Reward Task (EEfRT) Score for Baseline Press Rate at Week 6 and Week 12
The EEfRT is a multi-trial computerized task in which participants are given the opportunity on each trial to choose between 2 tasks that differ in difficulty level and are associated with varying levels of monetary reward. The test measures drug effects on the willingness to expend effort in relation to the amount of reward or probability of reward. The ratio of hard task choices with moderate probability reward is used as an outcome measure for negative symptoms. EEfRT scores are analyzed for 8 variables. Variable 1 is the Baseline press rate and is defined as the value coded as average presses/second. Scores range from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicative of faster button pressing ability. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the EEfRT Score for Choice Reaction Time (RT) 1st 50 at Week 6 and Week 12
The EEfRT is a multi-trial computerized test that reliably measures drug effects on the willingness to expend effort in relation to the amount of reward or probability of reward. For each trial, participants are asked to choose between 2 tasks that differ in difficulty level and are associated with varying levels of monetary reward. EEfRT scores are analyzed for 8 variables. Variable 2 is the choice RT and is defined as the average RT measured in milliseconds for making a choice during the first 50 trials. Scores range from 0 to 10,000. The target range is greater than 500. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the EEfRT Score for Completed Tasks at Week 6 and Week 12
The EEfRT is a multi-trial computerized test that reliably measures drug effects on the willingness to expend effort in relation to the amount of reward or probability of reward. For each trial, participants are asked to choose between 2 tasks that differ in difficulty level and are associated with varying levels of monetary reward. EEfRT scores are analyzed for 8 variables. Variable 3 is the proportion of completed task (easy or hard) during the first 50 trials. Scores range from 0 to 1, with higher scores indicative of better task compliance. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the EEfRT Score for 12% Probability-Proportion High Effort Opts at Week 6 and Week 12
The EEfRT is a multi-trial computerized test that reliably measures drug effects on the willingness to expend effort in relation to the amount of reward or probability of reward. For each trial, participants are asked to choose between 2 tasks that differ in difficulty level and are associated with varying levels of monetary reward. EEfRT scores are analyzed for 8 variables. Variable 4 is the proportion of hard task choices made for the low (12%) probability condition during the first 50 trials of the task. Scores range from 0 to 1, with higher scores indicative of greater effort expenditure. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the EEfRT Score for 50% Probability-Proportion High Effort Opts 1st 50 at Week 6 and Week 12
The EEfRT is a multi-trial computerized test that reliably measures drug effects on the willingness to expend effort in relation to the amount of reward or probability of reward. For each trial, participants are asked to choose between 2 tasks that differ in difficulty level and are associated with varying levels of monetary reward. EEfRT scores are analyzed for 8 variables. Variable 5 is the proportion of hard task choices made for the medium (50%) probability condition during the first 50 trials of the task. Scores range from 0 to 1, with higher scores indicative of greater effort expenditure. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the EEfRT Score for 88% Probability-Proportion High Effort Opts 1st 50 at Week 6 and Week 12
The EEfRT is a multi-trial computerized test that reliably measures drug effects on the willingness to expend effort in relation to the amount of reward or probability of reward. For each trial, participants are asked to choose between 2 tasks that differ in difficulty level and are associated with varying levels of monetary reward. EEfRT scores are analyzed for 8 variables. Variable 6 is the proportion of hard task choices made for the hard (88%) probability condition during the first 50 trials of the task. Scores range from 0 to 1, with higher scores indicative of greater effort expenditure. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the EEfRT Score for All-Proportion High Effort Opts 1st 50 at Week 6 and Week 12
The EEfRT is a multi-trial computerized test that reliably measures drug effects on the willingness to expend effort in relation to the amount of reward or probability of reward. For each trial, participants are asked to choose between 2 tasks that differ in difficulty level and are associated with varying levels of monetary reward. EEfRT scores are analyzed for 8 variables. Variable 7 is the overall proportion of hard task choices made for the first 50 trials of the task. Scores range from 0 to 1, with higher scores indicative of greater effort expenditure. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the EEfRT Score for Difference - Proportion High Effort Opts 1st 50 at Week 6 and Week 12
The EEfRT is a multi-trial computerized test that reliably measures drug effects on the willingness to expend effort in relation to the amount of reward or probability of reward. For each trial, participants are asked to choose between 2 tasks that differ in difficulty level and are associated with varying levels of monetary reward. EEfRT scores are analyzed for 8 variables. Variable 8 is the difference between the proportion of hard task choices made for the high probability condition during the first 50 trials of the task. Scores range from -1 to 1, with higher scores indicative of greater sensitivity to probability information. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Number of Participants With a Reduction of 20% or Greater in the PANSS Total Score at Week 6 and Week 12
Treatment effect was evaluated by analyzing the proportion of participants with a 20% reduction from Baseline in the PANSS total score with SPCD analysis.
Measured: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the 4-Item NSA (NSA-4) Total Score at Week 6 and Week 12
The NSA-4 is comprised of the 4 NSA-16 items as follows: 1) restricted speech quantity, 2) emotion: reduced range, 3) reduced social drive, and 4) reduced interests, as well as an overall global rating of negative symptoms. The NSA-16 is a measure of the presence, severity, and range of negative symptoms associated with schizophrenia. It has a high interrater and test-retest reliability across languages and cultures. The possible NSA-4 total score ranges from 4 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater clinical severity of symptoms. Change was Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Jun 2015 (estimated)
- Study start1 Sep 2015
- Primary completion21 Jul 2017
- Study completion21 Jul 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for SchizophreniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 145 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02477670
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 15-AVP-786-202
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 18 Jun 2015
- Last updated
- 13 May 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Sequential Parallel Comparison Design (SPCD) Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of AVP-786 (Deuterated [d6]-Dextromethorphan Hydrobromide [d6-DM]/Quinidine Sulfate [Q]) as an Adjunctive Treatment for Patients With Residual Schizophrenia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02477670
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 15-AVP-786-202
- Conditions
- Schizophrenia
- Keywords
- Negative Symptoms, Schizophrenia, AVP-786
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 145 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 21 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 21 Jul 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Jun 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 16 Sep 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objectives of this 12-week study are to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of AVP-786 as an adjunctive treatment compared with placebo in patients with residual schizophrenia.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboPlacebo capsules administered twice a day over a 12-week period |
| AVP-786 | Experimental | Drug: AVP-786AVP-786 dose 2 capsules administered twice a day over a 12-week period |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients who meet DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia using the M.I.N.I. version 6.0.
- Patients must meet PANSS criteria
- Patients currently receiving atypical antipsychotics are eligible provided they are on a stable dose
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients with current major depressive disorder (MDD)
- Patients with extrapyramidal syndrome secondary to their ongoing antipsychotic medication
- Patients currently using anticholinergic medications
- Recent in-patient hospitalization
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AVP-786 | Drug | AVP-786 |
| Placebo | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in the 16-Item Negative Symptom Assessment (NSA-16) Total Score at Week 6 and Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
The NSA-16 is a measure of the presence, severity, and range of negative symptoms associated with schizophrenia. It has a high interrater and test-retest reliability across languages and cultures. The NSA-16 uses a 5-factor model to describe negative symptoms: (1) communication, (2) emotion/affect, (3) social involvement, (4) motivation, and (5) retardation. The possible NSA-16 total score ranges from 16 to 96, with a higher score indicating a worse condition. Change was Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
29 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Week 6 and Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the PANSS Negative Subscale Score at Week 6 and Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the PANSS Marder Negative Factor Score at Week 6 and Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the PANSS Prosocial Factor Subscale Score at Week 6 at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the PANSS Positive Subscale Score at Week 6 and Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the PANSS General Psychopathology Subscale Score at Week 6 and Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the PANSS Excitement Component Subscale Score at Week 6 and Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the NSA-16 Communication Domain Score at Week 6 and Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the NSA-16 Emotion/Affect Domain Score at Week 6 and Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the NSA-16 Social Involvement Domain Score at Week 6 and Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the NSA-16 Motivation Domain Score at Week 6 and Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the NSA-16 Retardation Domain Score at Week 6 at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the NSA-16 Global Negative Symptoms Score at Week 6 and Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the NSA-16 Global Level of Functioning Score at Week 6 and Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) Composite Score at Week 6 and Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Mean Actual Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) of Illness Score at Week 6 and Week 12
Time frame: Week 6 (Stage 1); Week 12 (Stage 2)
Mean Actual Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Score at Week 6 and Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6 (Stage 1), Week 12 (Stage 2)
Mean Actual Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at Week 6 at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6 (Stage 1), Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total Score at Week 6 and Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the Effort Expenditure for Reward Task (EEfRT) Score for Baseline Press Rate at Week 6 and Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the EEfRT Score for Choice Reaction Time (RT) 1st 50 at Week 6 and Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the EEfRT Score for Completed Tasks at Week 6 and Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the EEfRT Score for 12% Probability-Proportion High Effort Opts at Week 6 and Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the EEfRT Score for 50% Probability-Proportion High Effort Opts 1st 50 at Week 6 and Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the EEfRT Score for 88% Probability-Proportion High Effort Opts 1st 50 at Week 6 and Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the EEfRT Score for All-Proportion High Effort Opts 1st 50 at Week 6 and Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the EEfRT Score for Difference - Proportion High Effort Opts 1st 50 at Week 6 and Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Number of Participants With a Reduction of 20% or Greater in the PANSS Total Score at Week 6 and Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Change From Baseline in the 4-Item NSA (NSA-4) Total Score at Week 6 and Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 May 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Otsuka Clinical Trial WebsiteLink provided by the sponsor.
- Otsuka Clinical Trial TransparencyLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Schizophrenia
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Long-term Safety and Tolerability of Xanomeline and Trospium Chloride for the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders in Children and Adolescents
Schizophrenia, Autism-Related Irritability
Not yet recruiting
Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia
Treatment Resistant Disorders
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Sleep Monitoring for Early Detection of Relapse in People With Schizophrenia or Bipolar Disorder Receiving Usual Treatment
Bipolar Disorder (BD), SCHIZOPHRENIA 1 (Disorder)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Pharmacokinetics and Relative Bioavailability of Intranasal vs Intramuscular Olanzapine in Healthy Adult Participants
Healthy Adult Participants
Active, not recruiting
Designing and Evaluating a Classroom-Based Mental Health Programme for Adolescents.
Mental Health Promotion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
17 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing AVP-786 in people with Schizophrenia, run by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. at 17 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 17 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Sep 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in the 16-Item Negative Symptom Assessment (NSA-16) Total Score at Week 6 and Week 12 (time frame: Baseline and Week 6 (Stage 1); Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12 (Stage 2)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 May 2026.