Chronic Lymphocytic LeukemiaPhase 3ElevateTNNCT02475681
Acalabrutinib, Obinutuzumab and Chlorambucil in Treatment naïve CLL
A Phase 3 study testing Acalabrutinib, Obinutuzumab and Chlorambucil in people with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, run by Acerta Pharma BV at 155 sites in 18 countries.
Trial summary
This Primary objective is evaluating the efficacy of obinutuzumab in combination with chlorambucil (Arm A) compared with acalabrutinib in combination with obinutuzumab (Arm B) for the treatment of previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
- What is being tested?
- Acalabrutinib, Obinutuzumab and Chlorambucil
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 535 participants
- Where
- 155 sitesin 18 countries
- Study dates
- 26 Jun 2015to 15 Sep 2026
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Men and women:
- ≥ 65 years of age OR b. > 18 and < 65 years of age, provided that they meet at least one of the following criteria: i. Creatinine clearance 30 to 69 mL/min using the Cockcroft-Gault equation ii. A score higher than 6 on the CIRS-G (Appendix L).
- ECOG performance status of 0, 1, or 2.
- Diagnosis of CD20+ CLL that meets published diagnostic criteria (Hallek 2008):
- Monoclonal B cells (either kappa or lambda light chain restricted) that are clonally co-expressing ≥ 1 B-cell marker (CD19, CD20, or CD23) and CD5.
- Prolymphocytes may comprise ≤ 55% of blood lymphocytes.
Show all 30Show fewer
- Presence of ≥ 5 x 109 B lymphocytes/L (5000 μL) in the peripheral blood (at any point since diagnosis)
- Active disease meeting ≥ 1 of the following IWCLL 2008 criteria for requiring treatment:
- Evidence of progressive marrow failure as manifested by the development of, or worsening of, anemia (hemoglobin < 10 g/dL) and/or thrombocytopenia (platelets < 100,000/μL).
- Massive (i.e., ≥ 6 cm below the left costal margin), progressive, or symptomatic splenomegaly.
- Massive nodes (i.e., ≥ 10 cm in the longest diameter), progressive, or symptomatic lymphadenopathy.
- Progressive lymphocytosis with an increase of > 50% over a 2-month period or a LDT of < 6 months. LDT may be obtained by linear regression extrapolation of ALC obtained at intervals of 2 weeks over an observation period of 2 to 3 months. In subjects with initial blood lymphocyte counts of < 30 x 109/L (30,000/μL), LDT should not be used as a single parameter to define indication for treatment. In addition, factors contributing to lymphocytosis or lymphadenopathy other than CLL (e.g., infections) should be excluded.
- Autoimmune anemia and/or thrombocytopenia that is poorly responsive to standard therapy.
- Constitutional symptoms documented in the subject's chart with supportive objective measures, as appropriate, defined as ≥ 1 of the following disease-related symptoms or signs:
- Unintentional weight loss ≥ 10% within the previous 6 months before Screening.
- Significant fatigue (i.e., ECOG performance status 2; inability to work or perform usual activities).
- Fevers higher than 100.5°F or 38.0°C for 2 or more weeks before Screening without evidence of infection.
- Night sweats for > 1 month before Screening without evidence of infection.
- This criterion was deleted as of Protocol Amendment 3.
- Meet the following laboratory parameters:
- ANC ≥ 750 cells/μL (0.75 x 109/L), or ≥ 500 cells/μL (0.50 x 109/L) in subjects with documented bone marrow involvement, and independent of growth factor support 7 days before assessment.
- Platelet count ≥ 50,000 cells/μL (50 x 109/L), or ≥ 30,000 cells/μL (30 x 109/L) in subjects with documented bone marrow involvement, and without transfusion support 7 days before assessment. Subjects with transfusion-dependent thrombocytopenia are excluded.
- Serum AST and ALT/SGPT ≤ 3.0 x ULN.
- Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN.
- Estimated creatinine clearance (i.e., eGFR using Cockcroft-Gault) ≥ 30 mL/min
- Able to receive all outpatient treatment, all laboratory monitoring, and all radiologic evaluations.
- Women who are sexually active and can bear children must agree to use highly effective forms of contraception while on the study and for 2 days after the last dose of acalabrutinib or 18 months after the last dose of obinutuzumab in combination with chlorambucil, whichever is longer. Highly effective forms of contraception are defined in Section 6.4.4.
- Men who are sexually active and can beget children must agree to use highly effective forms of contraception during the study and for 90 days after the last dose of obinutuzumab or chlorambucil, whichever is later. Highly effective forms of contraception are defined in Section 6.4.4.
- Men must agree to refrain from sperm donation during the study and for 90 days after the last dose of obinutuzumab or chlorambucil, whichever is later.
- Must be willing and able to adhere to the study visit schedule, understand and comply with other protocol requirements, and provide written informed consent and authorization to use protected health information (in accordance with national and local subject privacy regulations). Note vulnerable subjects, as defined in International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) GCP, are not allowed on this protocol (e.g., prisoners or institutionalized subjects).
Who cannot join
- Any prior systemic treatment for CLL (note: Prior localized radiotherapy is allowed).
- Known CNS lymphoma or leukemia.
- Known prolymphocytic leukemia or history of, or currently suspected, Richter's syndrome.
- Missing or incomplete documentation of FISH results reflecting the presence or absence of 17p del and the percentage of cells with the deletion in subject records before randomization.
- Uncontrolled AIHA or ITP defined as declining hemoglobin or platelet count secondary to autoimmune destruction within the screening period or requirement for high doses of steroids (> 20 mg daily of prednisone daily or equivalent).
- Corticosteroid use > 20 mg within 1 week before first dose of study drug, except as indicated for other medical conditions such as inhaled steroid for asthma, topical steroid use, or as premedication for administration of study drug or contrast. For example, subjects requiring steroids at daily doses > 20 mg prednisone equivalent systemic exposure daily, or those who are administered steroids for leukemia control or WBC count lowering are excluded.
Show all 22Show fewer
- Major surgery within 4 weeks before first dose of study drug.
- History of prior malignancy except for the following:
- Malignancy treated with curative intent and with no evidence of active disease present for more than 3 years before Screening and felt to be at low risk for recurrence by treating physician.
- Adequately treated lentigo maligna melanoma without current evidence of disease or adequately controlled non-melanomatous skin cancer.
- Adequately treated cervical carcinoma in situ without current evidence of disease.
- Significant cardiovascular disease such as uncontrolled or symptomatic arrhythmias, congestive heart failure, or myocardial infarction within 6 months of screening, or any Class 3 or 4 cardiac disease as defined by the New York Heart Association Functional Classification, or QTc > 480 msec at screening.
- Unable to swallow capsules or malabsorption syndrome, disease significantly affecting gastrointestinal function, or resection of the stomach or small bowel or gastric bypass, symptomatic inflammatory bowel disease, or partial or complete bowel obstruction.
- Uncontrolled active systemic fungal, bacterial, viral, or other infection (defined as exhibiting ongoing signs/symptoms related to the infection and without improvement, despite appropriate antibiotics or other treatment) or ongoing intravenous anti-infective treatment.
- Known history of infection with HIV. 13. Vaccinated with live, attenuated vaccines within 4 weeks of first dose of study drug.
- 14. Serologic status reflecting active hepatitis B or C infection. Subjects with hepatitis B core antibody positive who are surface antigen negative or who are hepatitis C antibody positive will need to have a negative PCR result before randomization. Those who are hepatitis B surface antigen positive or hepatitis B PCR positive and those who are hepatitis C PCR positive will be excluded.
- 15. History of stroke or intracranial hemorrhage within 6 months before randomization.
- 16. Known history of a bleeding diathesis (e.g., hemophilia, von Willebrand disease).
- 17. Requires or receiving anticoagulation with warfarin or equivalent vitamin K antagonists (e.g., phenprocoumon) within 7 days of first dose of study drug.
- 18. Requires treatment with proton-pump inhibitors (e.g., omeprazole, esomeprazole, lansoprazole, dexlansoprazole, rabeprazole, or pantoprazole).
- 19. Breast feeding or pregnant. 20. Current life-threatening illness, medical condition, or organ system dysfunction which, in the Investigator's opinion, could compromise the subject's safety or put the study at risk.
- 21. Concurrent participation in another therapeutic clinical trial. 22. Requires treatment with a strong CYP3A inhibitor/inducer. 23. Presence of a gastrointestinal ulcer diagnosed by endoscopy within 3 months before screening.
Trial locations and contacts
155 sites in 18 countries.
155 sites in 18 countries
United States51 sites
Research Site
Anaheim, California, 92801
Research Site
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Research Site
Austin, Texas, 78705
Research Site
Bedford, Texas, 76022
Research Site
Billings, Montana, 59102
Research Site
Blue Ash, Ohio, 45242
Research Site
Brick, New Jersey, 08724
Research Site
Canton, Ohio, 44719
Research Site
COL, Maryland, 21044
Research Site
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Research Site
Dallas, Texas, 75230
Research Site
Fort Myers, Florida, 33901-8101
Research Site
Fort Sam Houston, Texas, 78234
Research Site
Goodyear, Arizona, 85395
Research Site
Hackensack, New Jersey, ?07601
Research Site
Houston, Texas, 77030
Research Site
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224
Research Site
Lafayette, Indiana, 47904
Research Site
Lake Success, New York, 11042
Research Site
Lone Tree, Colorado, 80124
Research Site
Los Angeles, California, 90017
Research Site
Los Angeles, California, 90033
Research Site
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Research Site
Louisville, Kentucky, 40207
Research Site
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
Research Site
New Braunfels, Texas, 78130
Research Site
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112
Research Site
New York, New York, 10029
Research Site
Niles, Illinois, 60714
Research Site
Northwest WA, Wisconsin, 20007
Research Site
Oxnard, California, 93030
Research Site
Palo Alto, California, 94304
Research Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85016
Research Site
Roanoke, Virginia, 24014
Research Site
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
Research Site
Round Rock, Texas, 76508
Research Site
Saint Cloud, Minnesota, 56303
Research Site
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112
Research Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78258
Research Site
Seattle, Washington, 98109
Research Site
Seattle, Washington, 98122
Research Site
Spokane, Washington, 99208
Research Site
Tacoma, Washington, 98405
Research Site
Tallahassee, Florida, 32308-5304
Research Site
Tallahassee, Florida, 32308
Research Site
Tampa, Florida, 33612
Research Site
Texas City, Texas, 77591
Research Site
Tyler, Texas, 75702
Research Site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007
Research Site
Wichita, Kansas, 67214
Research Site
Yakima, Washington, 98902
Israel13 sites
Research Site
Ashkelon, 7830604
Research Site
Beersheba, 84101
Research Site
Haifa, 31000
Research Site
Haifa, 31096
Research Site
Haifa, 34362
Research Site
Jerusalem, 9103102
Research Site
Nahariya, 22100
Research Site
Petah Tikvah, 49100
Research Site
Petah Tikvah, 49102
Research Site
Rehovot, 76100
Research Site
Tel Aviv, 64239
Research Site
Tel HaShomer, 52621
Research Site
Tiberias, 15208
Italy11 sites
Research Site
Alessandria, 15100
Research Site
Aviano, 33081
Research Site
Brescia, 25123
Research Site
Florence, 50134
Research Site
Meldola, 47014
Research Site
Milan, 20132
Research Site
Parma
Research Site
Ravenna, 48121
Research Site
Rimini, 47900
Research Site
Rome, 168
Research Site
Rozzano, 20089
Belgium9 sites
Research Site
Bruges, 8000
Research Site
Brussels, 1090
Research Site
Brussels, 1200
Research Site
Ghent, 9000
Research Site
Kortrijk, 8500
Research Site
Leuven, 3000
Research Site
Roeselare, 8900
Research Site
Wilrijk, 2610
Research Site
Yvoir, 5530
Poland9 sites
Research Site
Bydgoszcz, 85-168
Research Site
Gdansk, 80-129
Research Site
Gdynia, 81-519
Research Site
Krakow, 30-727
Research Site
Lodz, 93-510
Research Site
Lublin, 20-081
Research Site
Olsztyn, 10-228
Research Site
Opole, 46-020
Research Site
Słupsk, 76-200
United Kingdom9 sites
Research Site
Bournemouth, BH7 7DW
Research Site
Cambridge, CB2 0QQ
Research Site
Leeds, LS9 7TF
Research Site
Leicester, LE1 7RH
Research Site
London, SE5 9RS
Research Site
Plymouth, PL6 8DH
Research Site
Southampton, SO16 6YD
Research Site
Truro, TR1 3LJ
Research Site
Wolverhampton, WV10 0QP
Australia7 sites
Research Site
Darlinghurst, 2010
Research Site
Frankston, 3199
Research Site
Geelong, 3220
Research Site
South Brisbane, QLD 4101
Research Site
Waratah NSW, 2298
Research Site
Wollongong, 2500
Research Site
Woodville, 5011
Brazil6 sites
Research Site
Barretos, 14784-400
Research Site
Florianópolis, 88034-000
Research Site
Passo Fundo, 99010-260
Research Site
Porto Alegre, 90035-903
Research Site
Porto Alegre, 90470-340
Research Site
São Paulo, 155
Spain6 sites
Research Site
Barcelona, ?08041
Research Site
Madrid, 28006
Research Site
Madrid, 28031
Research Site
Madrid, 28041
Research Site
Majadahonda, 28222
Research Site
Santander, 39008
Canada5 sites
Research Site
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H2Y9
Research Site
Québec, G1J 1Z4
Research Site
Saint John, E2L 4L2
Research Site
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 4E6
Research Site
Winnipeg, R3E 0V9
France5 sites
Research Site
Bobigny, 93000
Research Site
Dijon, 21000
Research Site
Pierre-Bénite, 69310
Research Site
Strasbourg, 67098
Research Site
Villejuif, 94800
Germany5 sites
Research Site
Aschaffenburg, 63739
Research Site
Bielefeld, 33604
Research Site
Erlangen, 91052
Research Site
Heilbronn, 74078
Research Site
Warzburg, 97080
Hungary5 sites
Research Site
Budapest, 1085
Research Site
Budapest, 1122
Research Site
Debrecen, 4032
Research Site
Kaposvár, 7400
Research Site
Szolnok, 5004
Sweden4 sites
Research Site
Gothenburg, 41345
Research Site
Linköping, 58185
Research Site
Lund, SE-22185
Research Site
Örebro, 701 85
Lithuania3 sites
Research Site
Kaunas, LT-50009
Research Site
Klaipėda, LT-92288
Research Site
Vilnius, LT-08661
New Zealand3 sites
Research Site
Auckland, ?0620
Research Site
Otahuhu, 2025
Research Site
Tauranga, 3112
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label, 3 Arm Phase 3 Study of Obinutuzumab in Combination With Chlorambucil, Acalabrutinib (ACP-196) in Combination With Obinutuzumab, and Acalabrutinib Monotherapy in Subjects With Previously Untreated CLL
This Primary objective is evaluating the efficacy of obinutuzumab in combination with chlorambucil (Arm A) compared with acalabrutinib in combination with obinutuzumab (Arm B) for the treatment of previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Secondary objectives: 1) To evaluate the efficacy of obinutuzumab in combination with chlorambucil (Arm A) versus acalabrutinib monotherapy (Arm C) based on IRC assessment of PFS per IWCLL 2008 criteria.
2)To compare obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil (Arm A) versus acalabrutinib plus obinutuzumab (Arm B) and obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil (Arm A) versus acalabrutinib monotherapy (Arm C) in terms of: IRC-assessed objective response rate (ORR); Tine to next treatment (TTNT); Overall Survival (OS)
Read the detailed description
ELEVATE-TN is a global, phase 3, multicenter, open-label study in patients with treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Study enrollment is completed. The study randomized a total of 535 subjects in 142 study sites in 18 countries between 14 September 2015 through 08 February 2017. Patients were randomly assigned to receive Acalabrutinib and Obinutuzumab, Acalabrutinib monotherapy, or Obinutuzumab and oral Chlorambucil. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival between the two combination-therapy groups, defined as the time from randomization until disease progression by use of iwCLL 2008 criteria, or death, assessed by independent review committee (IRC). Crossover to Acalabrutinib was allowed in patients who progressed on Obinutuzumab-Chlorambucil.
The results of this study provide new evidence for therapy in patients with treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia by showing the efficacy of Acalabrutinib used with or without Obinutuzumab compared with chemoimmunotherapy.
Currently the study is in maintenance phase, with more than 430 subjects on study, to generate more evidence. We are not expecting any significant change in the near future.
- Conditions
- Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
- Being tested
- Acalabrutinib, Obinutuzumab, Chlorambucil
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AcalabrutinibDrug
Also called ACP-196 (Calquence)
ObinutuzumabDrug
Also called GAZYVA / GAZYVARO
ChlorambucilDrug
Also called LEUKERAN
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A - Obinutuzumab in Combination with Chlorambucil | Active comparator | Obinutuzumab IV infusions will be administered over a total of 6 treatment cycles starting at Cycle 1 Day 1. Chlorambucil will be orally administered on Days 1 and 15 of Cycles 1 through 6. Receives: Drug: Obinutuzumab; Drug: Chlorambucil |
| Arm B - Acalabrutinib in Combination with Obinutuzumab | Experimental | Obinutuzumab IV infusions will be administered over a total of 6 treatment cycles starting at Cycle 2 Day 1. Acalabrutinib (ACP-196) will be orally administered starting on Cycle 1 Day 1. Daily administration of Acalabrutinib (ACP-196) will continue until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Receives: Drug: Acalabrutinib; Drug: Obinutuzumab |
| Arm C - Acalabrutinib Monotherapy | Experimental | Acalabrutinib (ACP-196) will be orally administered on Cycle 1 Day 1 until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Receives: Drug: Acalabrutinib |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression-free Survival by IRC (Independent Review Committee) Assessment in Arm A Compared to Arm B
To evaluate the efficacy of obinutuzumab in combination with chlorambucil (Arm A) compared with acalabrutinib in combination with obinutuzumab (Arm B) based on IRC assessment of progression-free survival (PFS) per International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia criteria (IWCLL; Hallek et al. 2008) with incorporation of the clarification for treatment-related lymphocytosis (Cheson et al. 2012), hereafter referred to as IWCLL 2008 criteria, in subjects with previously untreated CLL. PFS, defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of first IRC-assessed disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever comes first.
Measured: IRC assessments were done from randomization date until disease progression or death or IRC discontinuation date on 08Feb2019 (as the IA based on this data cutoff date showed the study crossing superiority boundary) whichever comes first up to 40 months.
Secondary outcomes (4)
Progression-free Survival by IRC Assessment Arm A Versus Arm C
To evaluate the efficacy of obinutuzumab in combination with chlorambucil (Arm A) compared with acalabrutinib monotherapy (Arm C) based on IRC assessment of progression-free survival (PFS) per International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia criteria (IWCLL; Hallek et al. 2008) with incorporation of the clarification for treatment-related lymphocytosis (Cheson et al. 2012), hereafter referred to as IWCLL 2008 criteria, in subjects with previously untreated CLL. PFS, defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of first IRC-assessed disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever comes first.
Measured: IRC assessments were done from randomization date until disease progression or death or IRC discontinuation date on 08Feb2019 (as the IA based on this data cutoff date showed the study crossing superiority boundary) whichever comes first up to 40 months.
IRC-assessed Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Arm A Versus Arm B and Arm A Versus Arm C
ORR was defined as the proportion of subjects who achieved a best response of CR, CRi, nPR, or PR at or before initiation of subsequent anticancer therapy. ORR including PRL was defined as the proportion of subjects who achieved a best response of CR, CRi, nPR, PR or PRL at or before initiation of subsequent anticancer therapy
Measured: IRC assessments were done from randomization date until disease progression or death or IRC discontinuation date on 08Feb2019 (as the IA based on this data cutoff date showed the study crossing superiority boundary) whichever comes first up to 40 months.
Time to Next Treatment (TTNT) in Arm A Versus Arm B and Arm A Versus Arm C
TTNT was defined as the time from randomization to start date of non-protocol specified subsequent anticancer therapy for CLL or death due to any cause, whichever came first. TTNT was analyzed in the same fashion as that for the primary efficacy analysis
Measured: From randomization date to start of non-protocol specified subsequent anticancer therapy for CLL or death due to any cause, whichever came first assessed up to 40 months of follow-up.
Overall Survival (OS) in Arm A Versus Arm B and Arm A Versus Arm C
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to death due to any cause.
Measured: From randomization date until death, withdrawal by subject, lost to follow-up, or by analysis data cut off date on 08Feb2019 whichever comes first up to 40 months of follow-up.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Jun 2015 (estimated)
- Study start26 Jun 2015
- Primary completion8 Feb 2019
- Study completion15 Sep 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Lymphocytic LeukemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Acerta Pharma BVThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 535 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Acerta Pharma BV
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- AstraZeneca Clinical Study Information Center, Study director, 1-877-240-9479 information.center@astrazeneca.com
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02475681
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ACE-CL-007
- Other IDs
- 2023-509348-84-00, 2014-005582-73, 2014, 2023
- Acronym
- ElevateTN
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 12 Jun 2015
- Last updated
- 25 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Qualified researchers can request access to anonymized individual patient-level data from AstraZeneca group of companies sponsored clinical trials via the request portal. All request will be evaluated as per the AZ disclosure commitment: https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure. Yes, indicates that AZ are accepting requests for IPD, but this does not mean all requests will be shared.
Publications
Sharman JP, Egyed M, Jurczak W, Skarbnik A, Patel K, Flinn IW, Kamdar M, Munir T, Walewska R, Hughes M, Fogliatto LM, Herishanu Y, Banerji V, Follows G, Walker P, Ghia P, Janssens A, Byrd JC, Ferrant E, Ferrajoli A, Wierda WG, Wachira CW, Suterwala BT, Miranda P, Munugalavadla V, Wun CC, Woyach JA. Acalabrutinib-obinutuzumab improves survival vs chemoimmunotherapy in treatment-naive CLL in the 6-year follow-up of ELEVATE-TN. Blood. 2025 Sep 11;146(11):1276-1285. doi: 10.1182/blood.2024024476.
PubMed 40198878Kittai AS, Allan JN, James D, Bridge H, Miranda M, Yong ASM, Fam F, Roos J, Shetty V, Skarbnik A, Davids MS. An indirect comparison of acalabrutinib with and without obinutuzumab vs zanubrutinib in treatment-naive CLL. Blood Adv. 2024 Jun 11;8(11):2861-2869. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023012142.
PubMed 38598745Sharman JP, Egyed M, Jurczak W, Skarbnik A, Pagel JM, Flinn IW, Kamdar M, Munir T, Walewska R, Corbett G, Fogliatto LM, Herishanu Y, Banerji V, Coutre S, Follows G, Walker P, Karlsson K, Ghia P, Janssens A, Cymbalista F, Woyach JA, Salles G, Wierda WG, Izumi R, Munugalavadla V, Patel P, Wang MH, Wong S, Byrd JC. Acalabrutinib with or without obinutuzumab versus chlorambucil and obinutuzmab for treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (ELEVATE TN): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020 Apr 18;395(10232):1278-1291. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30262-2.
PubMed 32305093
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label, 3 Arm Phase 3 Study of Obinutuzumab in Combination With Chlorambucil, Acalabrutinib (ACP-196) in Combination With Obinutuzumab, and Acalabrutinib Monotherapy in Subjects With Previously Untreated CLL
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02475681
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ElevateTN / ACE-CL-007
- Conditions
- Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 535 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Acerta Pharma BVIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 26 Jun 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 8 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Jun 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 10 Jan 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This Primary objective is evaluating the efficacy of obinutuzumab in combination with chlorambucil (Arm A) compared with acalabrutinib in combination with obinutuzumab (Arm B) for the treatment of previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Secondary objectives: 1) To evaluate the efficacy of obinutuzumab in combination with chlorambucil (Arm A) versus acalabrutinib monotherapy (Arm C) based on IRC assessment of PFS per IWCLL 2008 criteria.
2)To compare obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil (Arm A) versus acalabrutinib plus obinutuzumab (Arm B) and obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil (Arm A) versus acalabrutinib monotherapy (Arm C) in terms of: IRC-assessed objective response rate (ORR); Tine to next treatment (TTNT); Overall Survival (OS)
Detailed description
ELEVATE-TN is a global, phase 3, multicenter, open-label study in patients with treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Study enrollment is completed. The study randomized a total of 535 subjects in 142 study sites in 18 countries between 14 September 2015 through 08 February 2017. Patients were randomly assigned to receive Acalabrutinib and Obinutuzumab, Acalabrutinib monotherapy, or Obinutuzumab and oral Chlorambucil. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival between the two combination-therapy groups, defined as the time from randomization until disease progression by use of iwCLL 2008 criteria, or death, assessed by independent review committee (IRC). Crossover to Acalabrutinib was allowed in patients who progressed on Obinutuzumab-Chlorambucil.
The results of this study provide new evidence for therapy in patients with treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia by showing the efficacy of Acalabrutinib used with or without Obinutuzumab compared with chemoimmunotherapy.
Currently the study is in maintenance phase, with more than 430 subjects on study, to generate more evidence. We are not expecting any significant change in the near future.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A - Obinutuzumab in Combination with Chlorambucil | Active comparator | Drug: Obinutuzumab, Drug: ChlorambucilObinutuzumab IV infusions will be administered over a total of 6 treatment cycles starting at Cycle 1 Day 1. Chlorambucil will be orally administered on Days 1 and 15 of Cycles 1 through 6. |
| Arm B - Acalabrutinib in Combination with Obinutuzumab | Experimental | Drug: Acalabrutinib, Drug: ObinutuzumabObinutuzumab IV infusions will be administered over a total of 6 treatment cycles starting at Cycle 2 Day 1. Acalabrutinib (ACP-196) will be orally administered starting on Cycle 1 Day 1. Daily administration of Acalabrutinib (ACP-196) will continue until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. |
| Arm C - Acalabrutinib Monotherapy | Experimental | Drug: AcalabrutinibAcalabrutinib (ACP-196) will be orally administered on Cycle 1 Day 1 until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (30 listed)
- Men and women:
- ECOG performance status of 0, 1, or 2.
- Diagnosis of CD20+ CLL that meets published diagnostic criteria (Hallek 2008):
- Active disease meeting ≥ 1 of the following IWCLL 2008 criteria for requiring treatment:
- This criterion was deleted as of Protocol Amendment 3.
Key exclusion criteria (22 listed)
- Any prior systemic treatment for CLL (note: Prior localized radiotherapy is allowed).
- Known CNS lymphoma or leukemia.
- Known prolymphocytic leukemia or history of, or currently suspected, Richter's syndrome.
- Missing or incomplete documentation of FISH results reflecting the presence or absence of 17p del and the percentage of cells with the deletion in subject records before randomization.
- Uncontrolled AIHA or ITP defined as declining hemoglobin or platelet count secondary to autoimmune destruction within the screening period or requirement for high doses of steroids (> 20 mg daily of prednisone daily or equivalent).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AcalabrutinibAlso: ACP-196 (Calquence) | Drug | Arm B - Acalabrutinib in Combination with Obinutuzumab, Arm C - Acalabrutinib Monotherapy |
| ObinutuzumabAlso: GAZYVA / GAZYVARO | Drug | Arm A - Obinutuzumab in Combination with Chlorambucil, Arm B - Acalabrutinib in Combination with Obinutuzumab |
| ChlorambucilAlso: LEUKERAN | Drug | Arm A - Obinutuzumab in Combination with Chlorambucil |
Primary outcome
Progression-free Survival by IRC (Independent Review Committee) Assessment in Arm A Compared to Arm B
Time frame: IRC assessments were done from randomization date until disease progression or death or IRC discontinuation date on 08Feb2019 (as the IA based on this data cutoff date showed the study crossing superiority boundary) whichever comes first up to 40 months.
To evaluate the efficacy of obinutuzumab in combination with chlorambucil (Arm A) compared with acalabrutinib in combination with obinutuzumab (Arm B) based on IRC assessment of progression-free survival (PFS) per International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia criteria (IWCLL; Hallek et al. 2008) with incorporation of the clarification for treatment-related lymphocytosis (Cheson et al. 2012), hereafter referred to as IWCLL 2008 criteria, in subjects with previously untreated CLL. PFS, defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of first IRC-assessed disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever comes first.
4 secondary outcomes
Progression-free Survival by IRC Assessment Arm A Versus Arm C
Time frame: IRC assessments were done from randomization date until disease progression or death or IRC discontinuation date on 08Feb2019 (as the IA based on this data cutoff date showed the study crossing superiority boundary) whichever comes first up to 40 months.
IRC-assessed Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Arm A Versus Arm B and Arm A Versus Arm C
Time frame: IRC assessments were done from randomization date until disease progression or death or IRC discontinuation date on 08Feb2019 (as the IA based on this data cutoff date showed the study crossing superiority boundary) whichever comes first up to 40 months.
Time to Next Treatment (TTNT) in Arm A Versus Arm B and Arm A Versus Arm C
Time frame: From randomization date to start of non-protocol specified subsequent anticancer therapy for CLL or death due to any cause, whichever came first assessed up to 40 months of follow-up.
Overall Survival (OS) in Arm A Versus Arm B and Arm A Versus Arm C
Time frame: From randomization date until death, withdrawal by subject, lost to follow-up, or by analysis data cut off date on 08Feb2019 whichever comes first up to 40 months of follow-up.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Aug 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40198878Sharman JP, Egyed M, Jurczak W, Skarbnik A, Patel K, Flinn IW, Kamdar M, Munir T, Walewska R, Hughes M, Fogliatto LM, Herishanu Y, Banerji V, Follows G, Walker P, Ghia P, Janssens A, Byrd JC, Ferrant E, Ferrajoli A, Wierda WG, Wachira CW, Suterwala BT, Miranda P, Munugalavadla V, Wun CC, Woyach JA. Acalabrutinib-obinutuzumab improves survival vs chemoimmunotherapy in treatment-naive CLL in the 6-year follow-up of ELEVATE-TN. Blood. 2025 Sep 11;146(11):1276-1285. doi: 10.1182/blood.2024024476.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38598745Kittai AS, Allan JN, James D, Bridge H, Miranda M, Yong ASM, Fam F, Roos J, Shetty V, Skarbnik A, Davids MS. An indirect comparison of acalabrutinib with and without obinutuzumab vs zanubrutinib in treatment-naive CLL. Blood Adv. 2024 Jun 11;8(11):2861-2869. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023012142.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32305093Sharman JP, Egyed M, Jurczak W, Skarbnik A, Pagel JM, Flinn IW, Kamdar M, Munir T, Walewska R, Corbett G, Fogliatto LM, Herishanu Y, Banerji V, Coutre S, Follows G, Walker P, Karlsson K, Ghia P, Janssens A, Cymbalista F, Woyach JA, Salles G, Wierda WG, Izumi R, Munugalavadla V, Patel P, Wang MH, Wong S, Byrd JC. Acalabrutinib with or without obinutuzumab versus chlorambucil and obinutuzmab for treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (ELEVATE TN): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020 Apr 18;395(10232):1278-1291. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30262-2.
- Statistical Analysis Plan RedactedLink provided by the sponsor.
- ProtocolLink provided by the sponsor.
- Redacted Clinical Study Report synopsisLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Qualified researchers can request access to anonymized individual patient-level data from AstraZeneca group of companies sponsored clinical trials via the request portal. All request will be evaluated as per the AZ disclosure commitment: https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure. Yes, indicates that AZ are accepting requests for IPD, but this does not mean all requests will be shared.
Related trials for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Nemtabrutinib for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)/Small Lymphocytic Leukemia (SLL) Refractory to Covalent Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor or Pirtobrutinib and Previously Treated With a BCL2 Inhibitor
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Small Lymphocytic Leukemia
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History Study of Monoclonal B Cell Lymphocytosis (MBL), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (CLL/SLL), Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma (LPL)/Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM), and Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma (SMZL)
Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia, Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Nemtabrutinib Plus Venetoclax vs Venetoclax + Rituximab (VR) in Second-line (2L) + Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (CLL/SLL) (MK-1026-010/BELLWAVE-010).
Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell, Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
AstraZeneca Clinical Study Information Center study director
1-877-240-9479 information.center@astrazeneca.com
155 sites in 18 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Acalabrutinib, Obinutuzumab and Chlorambucil in people with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, run by Acerta Pharma BV at 155 sites in 18 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 30 inclusion and 22 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 155 sites in United States, Israel, Italy, Belgium, Poland and 13 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Jan 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression-free Survival by IRC (Independent Review Committee) Assessment in Arm A Compared to Arm B (time frame: IRC assessments were done from randomization date until disease progression or death or IRC discontinuation date on 08Feb2019 (as the IA based on this data cutoff date showed the study crossing superiority boundary) whichever comes first up to 40 months.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02475681, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Aug 2026.