AzTrials
AzTrials

NeoplasmsEXACTNCT02471053

Exercise to Prevent AnthrCycline-based Cardio-Toxicity Study

A study testing Moderate Intensity Exercise in people with Neoplasms and Heart; Disease, Functional, run by Nova Scotia Health Authority at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

As the numbers of cancer survivors grow, the long-term adverse effects of cancer therapy are becoming increasingly apparent. Most prominent are the toxic effects on the heart (cardiotoxicity) which may lead to cardiac dysfunction and increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
What is being tested?
Moderate Intensity Exercise
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
12 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Feb 2016to Sep 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

None listed.

Who cannot join

  • Any patients who meet the inclusion criteria, but have any significant cognitive limitations will be excluded from the study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • QEII Health Science Center, Nova Scotia Health Authority

    Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 3A7

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Exercise to Prevent AnthrCycline-based Cardio-Toxicity Study (EXACT)

As the numbers of cancer survivors grow, the long-term adverse effects of cancer therapy are becoming increasingly apparent. Most prominent are the toxic effects on the heart (cardiotoxicity) which may lead to cardiac dysfunction and increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The investigators hypothesize that an individualized aerobic training program for cancer patients receiving active treatment will be both feasible and safe and will result in improvements in overall levels of physical activity and quality of life.

Feasibility will be assessed by evaluating the recruitment, adherence and attrition rates, along with program safety. Efficacy will be assessed by evaluating changes in health-related outcomes.

Read the detailed description

As the numbers of cancer survivors grow, the long-term adverse effects of cancer therapy are becoming increasingly apparent. Most prominent are the toxic effects on the heart (cardiotoxicity) which may lead to cardiac dysfunction and increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Of note, data indicate that the magnitude of CVD risk for long-term survivors may exceed the risk of a secondary malignancy, which is a known complication of primary cancer therapy. While long-term follow-up data in adult cancer survivors is lacking, study of adult survivors of childhood cancers shows that these individuals are 15 times more likely to develop congestive heart failure (CHF), 10 times more likely to develop CVD, and 9 times more likely to suffer a stroke compared individuals who have not had cancer. Thus, it is clear that the long-term cardiotoxic effects of cancer therapy represent a significant concern for cancer survivors. The mechanisms responsible for the damaging effects of cancer therapy are not fully understood, however there is a need to maximize the benefits of treatment while minimizing long-term damage. Recent animal studies suggest that aerobic exercise training may offer a protective effect against chemotherapy-induced heart disease. However, to the investigator's knowledge, no study to date has examined the potential cardioprotective benefits of exercise training for patients receiving cancer treatment.

Accordingly, the purpose of this pilot study is to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a 12-week supervised exercise program based on the principles of cardiac rehabilitation for patients receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy.

Feasibility will be assessed by evaluating three outcomes, recruitment rate, adherence rate (i.e. exercise class attendance records), attrition rate, and safety (i.e. number of adverse events).

Efficacy will be assessed by evaluating changes in health-related outcomes to assess if these changes are equal to or better than what was measured at baseline. The health-related outcomes include cardiac function and biological markers of cardiotoxicity.

Being tested
Moderate Intensity Exercise
Keywords
Exercise, Quality of Life, Complementary Therapies, Neoadjuvant Therapy, Feasibility Studies
Medical subject headings
Neoplasms, Disease, Inflammation, Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Moderate Intensity ExerciseOther

    Exercise sessions will be held twice-weekly and will begin with a group warm-up activity, followed by 45 minutes of aerobic activity and ending with a cool down. All aerobic exercise will be performed at a moderate intensity, defined as exercise that elicits a heart rate (HR) between 40-60% of heart rate reserve (HRR). Prior to the initial exercise session target heart rates will be calculated for each subject based on the maximum HR achieved during their baseline stress test.

Study groups in NCT02471053
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Moderate Intensity ExerciseExperimentalAll consenting patients will participate in an aerobic training program, twice-weekly over a 12-week period. Assessments will be performed at baseline (pre-training) and post-program (12-weeks). All participants will continue to receive standard care for their cancer diagnosis.
Receives: Other: Moderate Intensity Exercise

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Feasibility as measured by rate of recruitment

    The rate of recruitment will be measured by comparing the number of patients screened to the number of patients enrolled (patients per month).

    Measured: 12 Weeks

  2. Number of adverse events

    The number of adverse events associated with exercise program will be used to examine safety.

    Measured: 12 Weeks

Secondary outcomes (20)
  1. Feasibility as measured by program adherence

    The program adherence will be calculated by dividing the total number of exercise sessions by the number of actual session attended.

    Measured: 12 Weeks

  2. Feasibility as measured by attrition rate

    The attrition rate will be measured by the number of patients who drop out of the study.

    Measured: 12 Weeks

  3. Cardiac Function

    Cardiac function will be measured by examining heart chamber size, ventricular function and blood flow between the cardiac chambers using a Multigated acquisition (MUGA) scan.

    Measured: 12 Weeks

  4. Cardiac Disease Risk

    Cardiac disease risk will be measured using the Framingham Risk Score.

    Measured: 12 Weeks

  5. Aerobic Fitness

    Aerobic fitness will be measured by comparing baseline and 12 week cardiac stress tests and the associated peak oxygen uptake values.

    Measured: 12 Weeks

  6. Fatigue

    The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Fatigue questionnaire will be used to compare baseline and 12 week self-reported levels of fatigue.

    Measured: 12 Weeks

  7. Physical Activity Behaviours

    Baseline and 12 week levels of physical activity will be measured using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire.

    Measured: 12 Weeks

  8. Life Quality

    The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General questionnaire along with the appropriate tumor specific appendix, will be used to compare baseline and 12 week quality of life measures.

    Measured: 12 Weeks

  9. Lipid Profile

    Baseline and 12 week levels will be compared.

    Measured: 12 Weeks

  10. Fasting Glucose

    Baseline and 12 week levels will be compared.

    Measured: 12 Weeks

  11. High-sensitivity Troponin (hs-TNT)

    Baseline and 12 week levels will be compared.

    Measured: 12 Weeks

  12. N-terminal of the prohormone brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP)

    Baseline and 12 week levels will be compared.

    Measured: 12 Weeks

  13. C-reactive protein (CRP)

    Baseline and 12 week levels will be compared.

    Measured: 12 Weeks

  14. Cytokines (IL-1α)

    Baseline and 12 week levels (picogram per milileter) will be compared.

    Measured: 12 Weeks

  15. Cytokines (IL-1β)

    Baseline and 12 week levels (picogram per milileter) will be compared.

    Measured: 12 Weeks

  16. Cytokines (IL-4)

    Baseline and 12 week levels (picogram per milileter) will be compared.

    Measured: 12 Weeks

  17. Cytokines (IL-6)

    Baseline and 12 week levels (picogram per milileter) will be compared.

    Measured: 12 Weeks

  18. Cytokines (IL-10)

    Baseline and 12 week levels (picogram per milileter) will be compared.

    Measured: 12 Weeks

  19. Cytokines (IL-17)

    Baseline and 12 week levels (picogram per milileter) will be compared.

    Measured: 12 Weeks

  20. Cytokines (TNFα)

    Baseline and 12 week levels (picogram per milileter) will be compared.

    Measured: 12 Weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Jun 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2016
  3. Primary completionSep 2017
  4. Study completionSep 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
12 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02471053
Sponsor's protocol ID
EXACT2015
Acronym
EXACT
Status last verified
Dec 2022
First submitted
11 May 2015
Last updated
6 Dec 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Albini A, Pennesi G, Donatelli F, Cammarota R, De Flora S, Noonan DM. Cardiotoxicity of anticancer drugs: the need for cardio-oncology and cardio-oncological prevention. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Jan 6;102(1):14-25. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp440. Epub 2009 Dec 10.

    PubMed 20007921
  • Yeh ET. Cardiotoxicity induced by chemotherapy and antibody therapy. Annu Rev Med. 2006;57:485-98. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.57.121304.131240.

    PubMed 16409162
  • Oeffinger KC, Mertens AC, Sklar CA, Kawashima T, Hudson MM, Meadows AT, Friedman DL, Marina N, Hobbie W, Kadan-Lottick NS, Schwartz CL, Leisenring W, Robison LL; Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Chronic health conditions in adult survivors of childhood cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct 12;355(15):1572-82. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa060185.

    PubMed 17035650
  • Keats MR, Grandy SA, Giacomantonio N, MacDonald D, Rajda M, Younis T. EXercise to prevent AnthrCycline-based Cardio-Toxicity (EXACT) in individuals with breast or hematological cancers: a feasibility study protocol. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016 Aug 5;2:44. doi: 10.1186/s40814-016-0084-9. eCollection 2016.

    PubMed 27965861

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Moderate Intensity Exercise in people with Neoplasms and Heart; Disease, Functional, run by Nova Scotia Health Authority at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Feasibility as measured by rate of recruitment (time frame: 12 Weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02471053, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Dec 2022.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in