DepressionNCT02466230
Antidepressant Mechanisms of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
A study testing Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in people with Depression, run by Weill Medical College of Cornell University.
Trial summary
This study utilizes resting state fMRI, arterial spin labelling imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, structural MR-imaging, and MR-spectroscopy of GABA and Glutamate to probe the antidepressant mechanisms of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Depression
- What is being tested?
- Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 28 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jan 2011to Oct 2013
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- A history of major depressive disorder by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID)
- Failure to respond to at least two previous antidepressant trials at adequate doses for 8 weeks (for current or prior major depressive episodes)
- A minimum 17-item Hamilton depression rating scale of 17 on both the screening day and the treatment day #1
- Age 18-70
- Participants may be taking antidepressants, antipsychotics, or low-dose mood stabilizers during the study
- Participants may be in psychotherapy during the study
Who cannot join
- Participants with metal implants (Will use the NY Presbyterian Hospital MRI Checklist)
- Prior exposure to TMS
- Pregnant women
- Lactating women
- Bipolar disorder (on the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID)
- Current depressive episode longer than 3 years
Show all 14Show fewer
- Active suicidal ideation with plan or intent
- Borderline personality disorder (on the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID)
- Substance abuse or dependence with the past 3 years
- Current urine drug screen positive for any drugs of abuse
- Current symptoms of psychosis
- History of seizure disorder
- History of closed head injury with loss of consciousness
- History of brain surgery
About this study
Official title: Predictive and Response Biomarkers of Effective Treatment With Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Major Depressive Disorder
This study utilizes resting state fMRI, arterial spin labelling imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, structural MR-imaging, and MR-spectroscopy of GABA and Glutamate to probe the antidepressant mechanisms of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). The above imaging modalities will be acquired before and after an open-label 5 week course of rTMS for depression in currently depressed individuals with treatment resistant depression. Changes in functional, structural, and neurochemical markers will be investigated in rTMS responders and nonresponders to elucidate mechanisms of plasticity that correlate with treatment response. Additionally, functional, structural, and neurochemical signatures at baseline that correlate with subsequent treatment response will be investigated.
Read the detailed description
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) applied over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) alleviates mood in major depression. This treatment received FDA approval in 2009 and is now in routine clinical use for the treatment of major depression. A recently published sham-controlled study showed a response rate of 14% in real rTMS compared to 5% in sham rTMS. The response, defined by a greater than 50% reduction in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale from pre-treatment to post-treatment, was also found to be 14% in one recent meta-analysis. The inclusion criteria in these studies admitted a broad spectrum of participants, ranging from subjects having a first major depressive episode, to those having failed multiple medication trials, suggesting that a subgroup with a more robust response may be masked by an unresponsive group. Abnormal function of the left frontal lobe accompanies major depression and this may be normalized by rTMS Cerebral blood flow measured with SPECT imaging was reduced in the left DLPFC of depressed subjects and was increased during and after a course of rTMS over the left DLPFC. Decreased blood flow was found in a broader region of frontal and paralimbic regions in depressed individuals and treatment success was associated with decreased blood flow in the inferior frontal lobes both pre- and post- treatment. Greater post-treatment vs. pre-treatment BOLD activation of left frontal regions was demonstrated using fMRI in a planning task that engages the frontal lobes. Left prefrontal myo-inositol is reduced in depressed subjects and this is normalized by rTMS. The above functional abnormalities view the frontal lobe in isolation. However, recent work has demonstrated a network-based structural marker of risk for familial depression consisting of decreased cortical and white mater volume. Resting state fMRI (rs-fMRI) tests cross-regional temporal coherence in low frequency oscillations in brain responses (~0.1 Hz) that are believed to represent spontaneous neural activity. Correlated spontaneous fluctuations are understood to reflect functional connections between brain regions that arise through a history of co-activation across one's lifetime. Previous work has shown that depressed patients exhibit altered functional connectivity patterns as gauged by rs-fMRI, and some studies suggest that these differences may be mitigated by treatment with antidepressant medications. However, whether and how TMS may affect functional connectivity is unknown. I propose to acquire the several described MRI types both before and after rTMS treatment in a search for predictive markers of rTMS treatment success as well as markers of treatment-induced change. Arterial spin labeling will be acquired to measure the blood flow distribution throughout the brain, both to confirm the SPECT results already reported and to test for additional regions of change. Resting state fMRI will be collected and DTI will be used to explore the structural basis of functional network changes. Structural MRI will be collected to measure cortical thickness and white matter volumes that may be predictive of rTMS response. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy will be collected to confirm the previously reported finding of rTMS-induced myo-inositol changes, as well as to consider the Glutamate/Glutamine and GABA spectra, given the importance of these neurotransmitters in theories of depression.
- Conditions
- Depression
- Being tested
- Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
- Keywords
- Magnetic stimulation of the brain, Antidepressant mechanisms
- Medical subject headings
- Depression
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationDevice
Active repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for 25 days (Monday through Friday for 5 consecutive weeks). Active rTMS with the FDA approved Neuronetics TMS system. Each treatment will target the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. rTMS will be administered at 10Hz with a duty cycle of 4 seconds on and 26 seconds off for 37.5 min.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Active rTMS | Experimental | Subjects in the active rTMS arm will receive daily active repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatments for 25 days (Monday through Friday for 5 consecutive weeks). Active rTMS with the FDA approved Neuronetics TMS system will be administered. Each treatment will target the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. rTMS will be administered at 10Hz with a duty cycle of 4 seconds on and 26 seconds off for 37.5 min. Receives: Device: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Depression Severity Measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (24-Item)
The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale is 24 items with total scores ranging from 0-76. Higher scores indicate greater severity of depression. (0-7 = None; 8-13 = Mild; 14-18 = Moderate; 19-23 = Severe; 23 and higher = very severe). Total scores are reported with no subscales.
Measured: Change in score on Hamilton Depression Rating Scale from baseline to immediately after the final rTMS treatment (5 weeks)
Secondary outcomes (1)
Depression Severity Measured by the Public Health Questionnaire-9
Self-rated scale of symptoms of depression. Nine items with a maximum score of 27. Higher score means more severe depression (0-4 = None; 5-9 = Mild; 10-14 = Moderate; 15-19 = Severe; 20 and higher = Very Severe).
Measured: Change in score in Public Health Questionnaire-9 from baseline to immediately after the final rTMS treatment (5 weeks)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Jun 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2011
- Primary completionOct 2013
- Study completionOct 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for DepressionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 28 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Weill Medical College of Cornell University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression, Neuronetics
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Marc J Dubin, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Weill Medical College of Cornell University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02466230
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1101011475
- Status last verified
- Aug 2018
- First submitted
- 28 May 2015
- Last updated
- 10 Sep 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Sep 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Predictive and Response Biomarkers of Effective Treatment With Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Major Depressive Disorder
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02466230
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1101011475
- Conditions
- Depression
- Keywords
- Magnetic stimulation of the brain, Antidepressant mechanisms
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 28 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression, Neuronetics
- Study start
- Jan 2011
- Primary completion
- Oct 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Jun 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 10 Sep 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study utilizes resting state fMRI, arterial spin labelling imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, structural MR-imaging, and MR-spectroscopy of GABA and Glutamate to probe the antidepressant mechanisms of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). The above imaging modalities will be acquired before and after an open-label 5 week course of rTMS for depression in currently depressed individuals with treatment resistant depression. Changes in functional, structural, and neurochemical markers will be investigated in rTMS responders and nonresponders to elucidate mechanisms of plasticity that correlate with treatment response. Additionally, functional, structural, and neurochemical signatures at baseline that correlate with subsequent treatment response will be investigated.
Detailed description
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) applied over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) alleviates mood in major depression. This treatment received FDA approval in 2009 and is now in routine clinical use for the treatment of major depression. A recently published sham-controlled study showed a response rate of 14% in real rTMS compared to 5% in sham rTMS. The response, defined by a greater than 50% reduction in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale from pre-treatment to post-treatment, was also found to be 14% in one recent meta-analysis. The inclusion criteria in these studies admitted a broad spectrum of participants, ranging from subjects having a first major depressive episode, to those having failed multiple medication trials, suggesting that a subgroup with a more robust response may be masked by an unresponsive group. Abnormal function of the left frontal lobe accompanies major depression and this may be normalized by rTMS Cerebral blood flow measured with SPECT imaging was reduced in the left DLPFC of depressed subjects and was increased during and after a course of rTMS over the left DLPFC. Decreased blood flow was found in a broader region of frontal and paralimbic regions in depressed individuals and treatment success was associated with decreased blood flow in the inferior frontal lobes both pre- and post- treatment. Greater post-treatment vs. pre-treatment BOLD activation of left frontal regions was demonstrated using fMRI in a planning task that engages the frontal lobes. Left prefrontal myo-inositol is reduced in depressed subjects and this is normalized by rTMS. The above functional abnormalities view the frontal lobe in isolation. However, recent work has demonstrated a network-based structural marker of risk for familial depression consisting of decreased cortical and white mater volume. Resting state fMRI (rs-fMRI) tests cross-regional temporal coherence in low frequency oscillations in brain responses (~0.1 Hz) that are believed to represent spontaneous neural activity. Correlated spontaneous fluctuations are understood to reflect functional connections between brain regions that arise through a history of co-activation across one's lifetime. Previous work has shown that depressed patients exhibit altered functional connectivity patterns as gauged by rs-fMRI, and some studies suggest that these differences may be mitigated by treatment with antidepressant medications. However, whether and how TMS may affect functional connectivity is unknown. I propose to acquire the several described MRI types both before and after rTMS treatment in a search for predictive markers of rTMS treatment success as well as markers of treatment-induced change. Arterial spin labeling will be acquired to measure the blood flow distribution throughout the brain, both to confirm the SPECT results already reported and to test for additional regions of change. Resting state fMRI will be collected and DTI will be used to explore the structural basis of functional network changes. Structural MRI will be collected to measure cortical thickness and white matter volumes that may be predictive of rTMS response. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy will be collected to confirm the previously reported finding of rTMS-induced myo-inositol changes, as well as to consider the Glutamate/Glutamine and GABA spectra, given the importance of these neurotransmitters in theories of depression.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Active rTMS | Experimental | Device: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationSubjects in the active rTMS arm will receive daily active repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatments for 25 days (Monday through Friday for 5 consecutive weeks). Active rTMS with the FDA approved Neuronetics TMS system will be administered. Each treatment will target the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. rTMS will be administered at 10Hz with a duty cycle of 4 seconds on and 26 seconds off for 37.5 min. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- A history of major depressive disorder by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID)
- Failure to respond to at least two previous antidepressant trials at adequate doses for 8 weeks (for current or prior major depressive episodes)
- A minimum 17-item Hamilton depression rating scale of 17 on both the screening day and the treatment day #1
- Age 18-70
- Participants may be taking antidepressants, antipsychotics, or low-dose mood stabilizers during the study
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Participants with metal implants (Will use the NY Presbyterian Hospital MRI Checklist)
- Prior exposure to TMS
- Pregnant women
- Lactating women
- Bipolar disorder (on the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationActive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for 25 days (Monday through Friday for 5 consecutive weeks). Active rTMS with the FDA approved Neuronetics TMS system. Each treatment will target the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. rTMS will be administered at 10Hz with a duty cycle of 4 seconds on and 26 seconds off for 37.5 min. | Device | Active rTMS |
Primary outcome
Depression Severity Measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (24-Item)
Time frame: Change in score on Hamilton Depression Rating Scale from baseline to immediately after the final rTMS treatment (5 weeks)
The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale is 24 items with total scores ranging from 0-76. Higher scores indicate greater severity of depression. (0-7 = None; 8-13 = Mild; 14-18 = Moderate; 19-23 = Severe; 23 and higher = very severe). Total scores are reported with no subscales.
1 secondary outcome
Depression Severity Measured by the Public Health Questionnaire-9
Time frame: Change in score in Public Health Questionnaire-9 from baseline to immediately after the final rTMS treatment (5 weeks)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Sep 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Depression
Recruiting
Unified Protocol in Penitentiary Facilities
Depression Disorders, Anxiety
Not yet recruiting
Preventive and Personalized Digital Emotion Regulation Skills Intervention to Reduce Depression and Anxiety in Youths With Adverse Childhood Experiences
Adverse Childhood Experience, Depression / Major Depressive Disorder
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Functional Impact of Psychological Symptoms in Patients With Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome (SSCD): a National Cross-sectional Study
Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
Recruiting
Cultural Adaptation of an Online Parenting Intervention to Reduce the Risk of Depression and Anxiety in Adolescents
Risk of Depression and Anxiety
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Marc J Dubin, MD, PhD principal investigator
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in people with Depression, run by Weill Medical College of Cornell University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Sep 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Depression Severity Measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (24-Item) (time frame: Change in score on Hamilton Depression Rating Scale from baseline to immediately after the final rTMS treatment (5 weeks)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2018.