AzTrials
AzTrials

Primary Bacterial PeritonitisNCT02463721

Identification of Ascitic Fluid Bacterial Pathogens in Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

A study testing ascitic fluid culture and microbiological testing in people with Primary Bacterial Peritonitis, run by Tanta University at 1 site in Egypt.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Several studies have pointed out changes in the epidemiology of the causative bacteria in SBP and bacterascites and in their susceptibility to antibiotics. In particular, the development of beta-lactamase enzymes, which confer resistance to clavulanate, or extended spectrum beta-lactamases in Escherichia coli. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Primary Bacterial Peritonitis
What is being tested?
ascitic fluid culture and microbiological testing
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
Jan 2015to Dec 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Liver cirrhosis with ascites and suspected to have SBP.
  • ascitic fluid PMNL ≥ 250 cells/mm3

Who cannot join

  • ascitic fluid with polymicrobial infections
  • patients started empirical antibiotics without prior culture.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Sherief Abd-elsalam, lecturer contact

00201095159522

Sheriefabdelsalam@yahoo.com

Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Tanta university hospital

    Tanta

    Sherief Abd-Elsalam, 00201000040794, Sherif_tropical@yahoo.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Identification of Ascitic Fluid Bacterial Pathogens in Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis in Nile Delta and Its Impact on Clinical Outcome of These Patients

Several studies have pointed out changes in the epidemiology of the causative bacteria in SBP and bacterascites and in their susceptibility to antibiotics. In particular, the development of beta-lactamase enzymes, which confer resistance to clavulanate, or extended spectrum beta-lactamases in Escherichia coli. The potential emergence of enterococci, methicillin-resistant S. aureus, or fluoroquinolone-resistant bacteria, following norfloxacin prophylaxis, is also a cause of concern since they may be associated with a higher risk of therapeutic failure.

The microbial etiology of SBP remains relatively constant; however, the antibiotic resistance rate especially for third-generation cephalosporins (including cefotaxime and ceftazidime), ciprofloxacin, and ofloxacin increased dramatically

Read the detailed description

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), defined as an infection of ascites in the absence of a contiguous source of infection.

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a common and potentially fatal bacterial infection in patients with cirrhosis and ascites, occurring in 10 to 30% of patients, with in-hospital mortality rates ranging from 20 to 30% .

It is secondary to impaired humoral and cellular immune responses that result in indirect intestinal bacterial translocation into the ascitic fluid.

SBP is also associated with a poor long-term prognosis for patients, as mortality rates can reach 50 to 70% at 1 year.

Early diagnosis and early optimal treatment of these infections with appropriate antibiotics and the prevention of hepatorenal syndrome with albumin are required .

Current European and most other international guidelines recommend the use of a third-generation cephalosporin as the first choice, or amoxicillin-clavulanate acid or fluoroquinolones as an alternative choice.

These recommendations are based mainly on clinical trials that were very often conducted a decade or more ago, and on the assumption that E. coli would be involved in nearly half of the cases.

Several studies have pointed out changes in the epidemiology of the causative bacteria in SBP and bacterascites and in their susceptibility to antibiotics. In particular, the development of beta-lactamase enzymes, which confer resistance to clavulanate, or extended spectrum beta-lactamases in Escherichia coli.The potential emergence of enterococci, methicillin-resistant S. aureus, or fluoroquinolone-resistant bacteria, following norfloxacin prophylaxis, is also a cause of concern since they may be associated with a higher risk of therapeutic failure.

Being tested
ascitic fluid culture and microbiological testing
Keywords
sbp, culture

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ascitic fluid culture and microbiological testingOther

    ascitic fluid culture and microbiological testing for 100 patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites with suspicion of SBP

Study groups in NCT02463721
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SBP patientsOtherascitic fluid culture and microbiological testing for 100 patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites with suspicion of SBP
Receives: Other: ascitic fluid culture and microbiological testing

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. identification of SBP bacterial pathogens through gram stain or other specific stains

    identification of SBP bacterial pathogens through gram stain or other specific stains

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Jun 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2015
  3. Primary completionDec 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02463721
Sponsor's protocol ID
SBP
Status last verified
Dec 2017
First submitted
27 May 2015
Last updated
3 Jan 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing ascitic fluid culture and microbiological testing in people with Primary Bacterial Peritonitis, run by Tanta University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jan 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Sherief Abd-elsalam, lecturer (00201095159522, Sheriefabdelsalam@yahoo.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

identification of SBP bacterial pathogens through gram stain or other specific stains (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jan 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in