Neovascular Age-Related Macular DegenerationPhase 1ASAP IINCT02461771
Assessment of Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Intravitreal Pegcetacoplan (APL-2) for Patients With Wet AMD
A Phase 1 study testing Pegcetacoplan in people with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration, run by Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 4 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The objective of this study is to provide initial safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics information of intravitreal administration of pegcetacoplan in order to support further development into larger Phase II studies for treatment of patients with AMD. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
- What is being tested?
- Pegcetacoplan
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 13 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 28 Jan 2015to 8 Mar 2016
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or Female
- Age ≥ 50 years
- The presence of an active choroidal neovascular lesion secondary to AMD
- On treatment with anti-VEGF therapy (Lucentis®, Eylea® or Avastin®)
- Must have received at least 3 anti-VEGF treatments over the 26-week period prior to screening (Screening Visit)
- Evidence that the macular fluid has responded to anti-VEGF in the past based on OCT in the opinion of PI
Show all 14Show fewer
- At screening, evidence of subretinal fluid and retinal cystic changes
- Must have received anti-VEGF treatment within 10 days prior to pegcetacoplan treatment (anti-VEGF can be administered on the same day of the screening visit after the screening procedures have been completed)
- OCTs of sufficient quality to allow for the assessment of the central macular fluid can be obtained
- Female subjects must be:
- Women of non-child-bearing potential (WONCBP), Or
- Women of child-bearing potential (WOCBP) with a negative pregnancy test at screening and must agree to use protocol defined methods of contraception for the duration of the study
- Males with female partners of child-bearing potential must agree to use protocol defined methods of contraception and agree to refrain from donating sperm for the duration of the study
- Willing and able to give informed consent
Who cannot join
- Choroidal neovascularization associated with other ocular diseases such as pathologic myopia, ocular histoplasmosis or posterior uveitis, etc
- Decreased vision due to retinal disease not attributable to choroidal neovascularization, such as nonexudative forms of AMD, geographic atrophy, inherited retinal dystrophy, uveitis or epiretinal membrane, a vitelliform-like lesion of the outer retina (e.g., as in pattern dystrophies or basal laminar drusen), idiopathic parafoveal telangiectasis, or central serous retinopathy
- Additional ocular diseases that have irreversibly compromised or, during follow-up, could likely compromise the VA of the study eye including amblyopia, anterior ischemic optic neuropathy, clinically significant diabetic macular edema, severe non proliferative diabetic retinopathy, or proliferative diabetic retinopathy
- Decreased vision due to significant media opacity such as corneal disease or cataract, or opacity precluding photography of the retina
- Cataract surgery within three months of enrollment
- Presence of any hemorrhage
Show all 12Show fewer
- History of treatment for CNV:
- Previous PDT treatment within 30 days prior to enrollment in the study
- Previous extrafoveal or juxtafoveal thermal laser photocoagulation within 30 days prior to enrollment in the study
- Intraocular surgery (including lens replacement surgery) within 3 months prior to randomization
- Medical problems that make consistent follow-up over the treatment period unlikely (e.g. stroke, severe MI, end stage malignancy), or in general a poor medical risk because of other systemic diseases or active uncontrolled infections
- Hypersensitivity to fluorescein
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 2 countries.
4 sites in 2 countries
United States3 sites
United States, California
Beverly Hills, California, 90211
United States, Florida
Miami, Florida, 33136
United States, New Hampshire
Portsmouth, New Hampshire, 03801
Australia1 site
Australia, New South Wells
Parramatta, New South Wales, 2150
About this study
Official title: Assessment of Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Intravitreal APL-2 Therapy for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
The objective of this study is to provide initial safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics information of intravitreal administration of pegcetacoplan in order to support further development into larger Phase II studies for treatment of patients with AMD.
- Being tested
- Pegcetacoplan
- Keywords
- AMD, Wet AMD, Neovascular AMD
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PegcetacoplanDrug
Also called APL-2
On treatment day, subjects will be administered a single 100 μL IVT injection of pegcetacoplan at the dose corresponding to their treatment assignment.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Pegcetacoplan Cohort 1 | Experimental | 4 mg of pegcetacoplan 100 μL IVT injection Receives: Drug: Pegcetacoplan |
| Pegcetacoplan Cohort 2 | Experimental | 10 mg of pegcetacoplan 100 μL IVT injection Receives: Drug: Pegcetacoplan |
| Pegcetacoplan Cohort 3 | Experimental | 20 mg of pegcetacoplan 100 μL IVT injection Receives: Drug: Pegcetacoplan |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Subjects Who Experienced Ocular and Systemic Adverse Events (AEs), Including by Severity
Safety was assessed throughout the study. A TEAE was defined as any AE that started on/after the IVT injection of pegcetacoplan.
Measured: Day 1 to Day 113
Number of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
The occurrence of any of the following AEs were considered DLTs: intraocular inflammation (vitritis or uveitis), endophthalmitis, sustained elevation of intraocular pressure ≥30 millimeters (mm) of mercury, and/or sustained loss of visual acuity ≥15 letters not attributable to the injection procedure or progression of disease.
Measured: Day 1 to Day 15
Median Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Last Measurable Concentration (AUC[0-t])
The AUC(0-t) was measured using the linear trapezoidal method when concentrations were increasing and the logarithmic trapezoidal method when concentrations were decreasing. The median AUC(0-t) is presented for each cohort.
Measured: Predose (screening), postdose Day 3 to Day 113
Median Dose Normalized AUC(0-t)
The AUC(0-t) was measured using the linear trapezoidal method when concentrations were increasing and the logarithmic trapezoidal method when concentrations were decreasing. The dose normalized AUC(0-t) was calculated for each subject by dividing the parameter by the subject's respective dose in milligrams. The median dose normalized AUC(0-t) is presented for each cohort.
Measured: Predose (screening), postdose Day 3 to Day 113
Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax)
The median Cmax is presented for each cohort.
Measured: Predose (screening), postdose Day 3 to Day 113
Median Dose Normalized Cmax
The dose normalized Cmax was calculated for each subject by dividing the parameter by the subject's respective dose in milligrams. The median dose normalized Cmax is presented for each cohort.
Measured: Predose (screening), postdose Day 3 to Day 113
Median Time to the Maximum Measured Serum Concentration (Tmax)
The median Tmax is presented for each cohort. If the maximum value occurred at more than 1 time point, Tmax was defined as the first time point with this value.
Measured: Predose (screening), postdose Day 3 to Day 113
Secondary outcomes (3)
Median Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity for the Study Eye
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letter score was determined using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity chart assessed at a starting distance of 4 meters. The score ranges from 0 to 100 letters, lower number indicating reduced visual acuity; a positive value of change from baseline indicates visual acuity gain and a negative value indicates visual acuity loss.
Measured: Day 1 to Day 113
Median Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness, Central Retinal Lesion Thickness and Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye
Central retinal thickness, central retinal lesion thickness and central subfield thickness were determined using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT).
Measured: Day 1 to Day 113
Median Change From Baseline in Macular Cube Volume in the Study Eye
Macular cube volume was determined using SD-OCT.
Measured: Day 1 to Day 113
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Jun 2015 (estimated)
- Study start28 Jan 2015
- Primary completion8 Mar 2016
- Study completion8 Mar 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Neovascular Age-Related Macular DegenerationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 13 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Federico Grossi, MD PhD, Study director, Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02461771
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- POT-CP043014
- Acronym
- ASAP II
- Status last verified
- Sep 2020
- First submitted
- 2 Jun 2015
- Last updated
- 6 Oct 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Oct 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Assessment of Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Intravitreal APL-2 Therapy for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02461771
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ASAP II / POT-CP043014
- Keywords
- AMD, Wet AMD, Neovascular AMD
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 13 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 28 Jan 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 8 Mar 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 8 Mar 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Jun 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 6 Oct 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this study is to provide initial safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics information of intravitreal administration of pegcetacoplan in order to support further development into larger Phase II studies for treatment of patients with AMD.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Pegcetacoplan Cohort 1 | Experimental | Drug: Pegcetacoplan4 mg of pegcetacoplan 100 μL IVT injection |
| Pegcetacoplan Cohort 2 | Experimental | Drug: Pegcetacoplan10 mg of pegcetacoplan 100 μL IVT injection |
| Pegcetacoplan Cohort 3 | Experimental | Drug: Pegcetacoplan20 mg of pegcetacoplan 100 μL IVT injection |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Male or Female
- Age ≥ 50 years
- The presence of an active choroidal neovascular lesion secondary to AMD
- On treatment with anti-VEGF therapy (Lucentis®, Eylea® or Avastin®)
- Must have received at least 3 anti-VEGF treatments over the 26-week period prior to screening (Screening Visit)
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Choroidal neovascularization associated with other ocular diseases such as pathologic myopia, ocular histoplasmosis or posterior uveitis, etc
- Decreased vision due to retinal disease not attributable to choroidal neovascularization, such as nonexudative forms of AMD, geographic atrophy, inherited retinal dystrophy, uveitis or epiretinal membrane, a vitelliform-like lesion of the outer retina (e.g., as in pattern dystrophies or basal laminar drusen), idiopathic parafoveal telangiectasis, or central serous retinopathy
- Additional ocular diseases that have irreversibly compromised or, during follow-up, could likely compromise the VA of the study eye including amblyopia, anterior ischemic optic neuropathy, clinically significant diabetic macular edema, severe non proliferative diabetic retinopathy, or proliferative diabetic retinopathy
- Decreased vision due to significant media opacity such as corneal disease or cataract, or opacity precluding photography of the retina
- Cataract surgery within three months of enrollment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PegcetacoplanAlso: APL-2On treatment day, subjects will be administered a single 100 μL IVT injection of pegcetacoplan at the dose corresponding to their treatment assignment. | Drug | Pegcetacoplan Cohort 1, Pegcetacoplan Cohort 2, Pegcetacoplan Cohort 3 |
Primary outcome
Number of Subjects Who Experienced Ocular and Systemic Adverse Events (AEs), Including by Severity
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 113
Safety was assessed throughout the study. A TEAE was defined as any AE that started on/after the IVT injection of pegcetacoplan.
Number of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 15
The occurrence of any of the following AEs were considered DLTs: intraocular inflammation (vitritis or uveitis), endophthalmitis, sustained elevation of intraocular pressure ≥30 millimeters (mm) of mercury, and/or sustained loss of visual acuity ≥15 letters not attributable to the injection procedure or progression of disease.
Median Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Last Measurable Concentration (AUC[0-t])
Time frame: Predose (screening), postdose Day 3 to Day 113
The AUC(0-t) was measured using the linear trapezoidal method when concentrations were increasing and the logarithmic trapezoidal method when concentrations were decreasing. The median AUC(0-t) is presented for each cohort.
Median Dose Normalized AUC(0-t)
Time frame: Predose (screening), postdose Day 3 to Day 113
The AUC(0-t) was measured using the linear trapezoidal method when concentrations were increasing and the logarithmic trapezoidal method when concentrations were decreasing. The dose normalized AUC(0-t) was calculated for each subject by dividing the parameter by the subject's respective dose in milligrams. The median dose normalized AUC(0-t) is presented for each cohort.
Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax)
Time frame: Predose (screening), postdose Day 3 to Day 113
The median Cmax is presented for each cohort.
Median Dose Normalized Cmax
Time frame: Predose (screening), postdose Day 3 to Day 113
The dose normalized Cmax was calculated for each subject by dividing the parameter by the subject's respective dose in milligrams. The median dose normalized Cmax is presented for each cohort.
Median Time to the Maximum Measured Serum Concentration (Tmax)
Time frame: Predose (screening), postdose Day 3 to Day 113
The median Tmax is presented for each cohort. If the maximum value occurred at more than 1 time point, Tmax was defined as the first time point with this value.
3 secondary outcomes
Median Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity for the Study Eye
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 113
Median Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness, Central Retinal Lesion Thickness and Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 113
Median Change From Baseline in Macular Cube Volume in the Study Eye
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 113
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Oct 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of 36-Week Refill Exchanges of Port Delivery System (PDS) With Ranibizumab in nAMD
Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Real World Evidence in China: Faricimab Use in Diabetic Macular Edema, Retinal Vein Occlusion, and Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (The Farseeing Study)
Diabetic Macular Edema, Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Phase 1/2 Study of VOY-101 in Patients With Advanced Non-Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Geographic Atrophy
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tarcocimab Tedromer and Tabirafusp Tedromer Compared to Aflibercept in Participants With Neovascular (Wet) Age-related Macular Degeneration (wAMD) - DAYBREAK
Wet Age-related Macular Degeneration
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of VIS-101 in Participants With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Neovascular Age Related Macular Degeneration(nAMD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Federico Grossi, MD PhD study director
Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
4 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing Pegcetacoplan in people with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration, run by Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 4 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 14 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in United States, Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Oct 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Subjects Who Experienced Ocular and Systemic Adverse Events (AEs), Including by Severity (time frame: Day 1 to Day 113). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Oct 2020.