AzTrials
AzTrials

Neonatal AnemiaMDCCTNCT02454101

Milking Versus Delayed Cord Clamping in Full Term Neonates

A study testing cord milking and delayed cord clamping in people with Neonatal Anemia, run by Ahmed Mohamed El Kotb Abdel Fattah at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To compare the short term risks and benefits of cord milking 5 times toward the neonate with delayed cord clamping for 120 seconds in the full term neonate delivered by cesarean section. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age, women only
Conditions the study is for
Neonatal Anemia
What is being tested?
cord milking and delayed cord clamping
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
300 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
Aug 2015to Mar 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Pregnant females going for cesarean section that completed 37 weeks of gestation
  • Medically free

Who cannot join

  • Known congenital anomalies of fetus.
  • Rhesus sensitization.
  • Fetal hydrops.
  • Medical disorder (preeclampsia - diabetes mellitus - hypertension - SLE).
  • Need for urgent resuscitation.
  • Multiple pregnancies.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Ain Chams University Maternity Hospital

    Cairo, Cairo Governorate, 02

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Milking Versus Delayed Cord Clamping in Full Term Neonates Delivered by Elective Cesarean Section A Randomized Controlled Trial

To compare the short term risks and benefits of cord milking 5 times toward the neonate with delayed cord clamping for 120 seconds in the full term neonate delivered by cesarean section.

Read the detailed description

Abstract Context: milking of the umbilical cord toward the neonate 5 times and delayed cord clamping both are good procedures to prevent anemia in neonates .

Objective: To investigate the effects of delayed umbilical cord clamping for 120 seconds, compared with milking of the cord 5 times toward the neonate on hemoglobin level after 6 weeks, Intubation,Respiratory distress,Clinical jaundice,Neonatal Intensive Care unit (NICU) admission,Apgar score (after 5 minutes of delivery).

-Maternal,Need for blood transfusion,Additional need for therapeutic uterotonics,Post postpartum hemorrhage (blood loss > 500cc),Intensive Care unit admission.

Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Ain Shams university maternity hospital. Participants:300 full term infants born after a low risk pregnancy by cesarean section delivery.

Intervention: Infants were randomized to delayed umbilical cord clamping (≥120 seconds after delivery) or cord milking (5 times to ward the neonate).

Conditions
Neonatal Anemia
Being tested
cord milking, delayed cord clamping
Medical subject headings
Anemia, Neonatal

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • cord milkingProcedure or surgery

    Also called milking of the cord

    milking of the cord 5 times toward the neonate

  • delayed cord clampingProcedure or surgery

    delay clamping of the cord for 120 seconds

Study groups in NCT02454101
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
cord milkingOthermilking of the umbilical cord 5 times toward the neonate
Receives: Procedure: delayed cord clamping
delayed cord clampingOtherdelayed cord clamping for 120 seconds
Receives: Procedure: cord milking

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Neonatal Hemoglobin Level

    neonatal 6 weeks hemoglobin measured in gram %

    Measured: 6 weeks after labor

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Jundice Requring Phtotherapy

    number of infants requiring phtotherapy for jundice in the first 2 weeks

    Measured: two weks

  2. Severe Postpartum Haemorrage

    (measured blood loss 1000 mL or more

    Measured: 24 hours after labor

  3. Neonatal Intubation

    number of newborns requirng intubation in the first 2 hours after delivery

    Measured: 1st 2 hours after delivery

  4. Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Admission

    number of Neonatal Intensive Care unit (NICU) admission in the 1st 24 hours after delivery

    Measured: 1st 24 hours after delivery

  5. Neonatal Apgar Score (After 5 Minutes of Delivery).

    • The Apgar test is done by a doctor, midwife, or nurse. The health care provider examines the baby's:
    1. Breathing effort
    2. Heart rate
    3. Muscle tone
    4. Reflexes
    5. Skin color
    • Each category is scored with 0, 1, or 2, depending on the observed condition.
    • The Apgar score is based on a total score of 1 to 10. The higher the score, the better the baby is doing after birth.
    • A score of 7, 8, or 9 is normal and is a sign that the newborn is in good health. A score of 10 is very unusual, since almost all newborns lose 1 point for blue hands and feet, which is normal for after birth.
    • Any score lower than 7 is a sign that the baby needs medical attention. The lower the score, the more help the baby needs

    Measured: 5 minutes of delivery

  6. Maternal Need for Blood Transfusion.

    number of mothers with hemoglobin level < 7mg/dl and need for blood transfusion

    Measured: 1st 24 hours after delivery

  7. Maternal Additional Need for Therapeutic Uterotonics

    number of mothers need for > 20 units of Oxycontin in the 1st 24 hours of delivery

    Measured: 1st 24 hours of delivery

  8. Duration of Third Stage of Labor

    number of minutes from delivery of the baby till delivery of the placenta

    Measured: immediatly after delivery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 May 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2015
  3. Primary completionMar 2016
  4. Study completionMar 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
300 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02454101
Sponsor's protocol ID
delayed cord clamping in term
Acronym
MDCCT
Status last verified
Apr 2016
First submitted
17 May 2015
Last updated
28 Jun 2016
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: lecture and seminar

Publications

  • Carlson ES, Tkac I, Magid R, O'Connor MB, Andrews NC, Schallert T, Gunshin H, Georgieff MK, Petryk A. Iron is essential for neuron development and memory function in mouse hippocampus. J Nutr. 2009 Apr;139(4):672-9. doi: 10.3945/jn.108.096354. Epub 2009 Feb 11.

    PubMed 19211831
  • Chaparro CM, Neufeld LM, Tena Alavez G, Eguia-Liz Cedillo R, Dewey KG. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping on iron status in Mexican infants: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2006 Jun 17;367(9527):1997-2004. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68889-2.

    PubMed 16782490
  • Eichenbaum-Pikser G, Zasloff JS. Delayed clamping of the umbilical cord: a review with implications for practice. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2009 Jul-Aug;54(4):321-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2008.12.012. No abstract available.

    PubMed 19555916
  • Emhamed MO, van Rheenen P, Brabin BJ. The early effects of delayed cord clamping in term infants born to Libyan mothers. Trop Doct. 2004 Oct;34(4):218-22. doi: 10.1177/004947550403400410.

    PubMed 15510946
  • Hutton EK, Hassan ES. Late vs early clamping of the umbilical cord in full-term neonates: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. JAMA. 2007 Mar 21;297(11):1241-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.11.1241.

    PubMed 17374818
  • Inch S. Management of the third stage of labour: another cascade of intervention?. Midwifery 1985;1:114-22.

  • Ladipo OA. Management of third stage of labour, with particular reference to reduction of feto-maternal transfusion. Br Med J. 1972 Mar 18;1(5802):721-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5802.721.

    PubMed 5015327
  • McCann JC, Ames BN. An overview of evidence for a causal relation between iron deficiency during development and deficits in cognitive or behavioral function. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Apr;85(4):931-45. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/85.4.931.

    PubMed 17413089
  • .McDonald S. Physiology and management of the third stage of labour. In: Fraser D, Cooper M editor(s). Myles textbook for mid- wives. 14th Edition. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2003.

  • Mercer JS. Current best evidence: a review of the literature on umbilical cord clamping. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2001 Nov-Dec;46(6):402-14. doi: 10.1016/s1526-9523(01)00196-9.

    PubMed 11783688
  • .Prendiville W, Elbourne D. Care during the third stage of labour. In: Chalmers I, Enkin M, Keirse MJNC editor(s). Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989: 1145-69.

  • Rabe H, Reynolds G, Diaz-Rossello J. Early versus delayed umbilical cord clamping in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18;(4):CD003248. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003248.pub2.

    PubMed 15495045
  • Rabe H, Reynolds G, Diaz-Rossello J. A systematic review and meta-analysis of a brief delay in clamping the umbilical cord of preterm infants. Neonatology. 2008;93(2):138-44. doi: 10.1159/000108764. Epub 2007 Sep 21.

    PubMed 17890882
  • .Smith J, Brennan BG. Management of the third stage of labor. EMedicine from WebMD (last updated 27 June 2006) (accessed 28 January 2007).

  • Szajewska H, Ruszczynski M, Chmielewska A. Effects of iron supplementation in nonanemic pregnant women, infants, and young children on the mental performance and psychomotor development of children: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Jun;91(6):1684-90. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.29191. Epub 2010 Apr 21.

    PubMed 20410098

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing cord milking and delayed cord clamping in people with Neonatal Anemia, run by Ahmed Mohamed El Kotb Abdel Fattah at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jun 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Jun 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Neonatal Hemoglobin Level (time frame: 6 weeks after labor). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02454101, which also lists 19 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jun 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in