Type 2 Diabetes MellitusPhase 4NCT02449603
Comparison of Exenatide vs. Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 on Glucose Variability in Type 2 Diabetes
A Phase 4 study testing Exenatide and Biphasic insulin Aspart 30 in people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Xijing Hospital at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
This is a multi-centre, open-label, randomized, parallel trial to compare the effect of Exenatide versus Biphasic insulin Aspart 30 on glucose variability and inflammatory markers in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- What is being tested?
- Exenatide and Biphasic insulin Aspart 30
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- Nov 2015to Apr 2018
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Provision of informed consent prior to any study specific procedures.
- Men and women (non-pregnant and using a medically approved birth-control method) aged between 18 and 70 years at screening.
- Confirmed type 2 diabetes with history of at least half a year.
- Treatment with stable, maximum tolerated doses of metformin (≧1500mg/d, ≧3 months).
- HbA1c ≥ 7.5% and ≤ 10.0% at screening or within 4 weeks prior to screening (by local laboratory).
- Body mass index: 21-35 kg/m^2.
Who cannot join
- Women who are pregnant, intending to become pregnant during the study period, currently lactating females, or women of child-bearing potential not using highly effective, medically approved birth control methods.
- Diagnosis or history of:
- Type 1 diabetes mellitus, diabetes resulting from pancreatic injury or secondary forms of diabetes, e.g., acromegaly or Cushing's syndrome.
- Acute metabolic diabetic complications such as ketoacidosis or hyperosmolar coma within the past 6 months.
- Previous treatment with any dipeptide peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitor or glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists within the past one year.
- History of hypersensitivity reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis, angioedema, exfoliative skin conditions) to dipeptide peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4) or Acarbose.
Show all 24Show fewer
- Treatment with any anti-diabetic medication for more than 7 consecutive days other than metformin in the last 3months prior to screening.
- Treatment with systemic glucocorticoids (oral, intravenous) for more than consecutive 7 days within the past 6 months.
- Triglycerides (fasting) > 4.5 mmol/L (> 400 mg/dL) at screening or within 4 weeks prior to screening (by local laboratory).
- Patients with clinically apparent liver disease characterized by either one of the following:
- Alanine transaminase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) > 3x upper limit of normal (ULN) confirmed on two consecutive measurements (by local laboratory) within 4 weeks prior to screening period
- Impaired excretory (e.g. hyperbilirubinemia) and/or synthetic function, or other conditions of decompensated liver disease such as coagulopathy, hepatic encephalopathy, hypoalbuminemia, ascites and bleeding from oesophageal varices.
- Acute viral or active autoimmune, alcoholic, or other types of hepatitis.
- Patients with moderate /severe renal impairment or end-stage renal disease (estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate ≤ 60 mL/min calculated by using the abbreviated equation developed by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study with modification for the Chinese population) at screening or within 4 weeks prior to screening (by local laboratory)
- Congestive heart failure defined as New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV.
- Significant cardiovascular history within the past 3 months prior to screening defined as: myocardial infarction, coronary angioplasty or bypass graft(s), valvular disease or repair, unstable angina pectoris, transient ischemic attack, or cerebrovascular accident.
- History of chronic pancreatitis or idiopathic acute pancreatitis.
- History of gastrointestinal disease including gastroenterostomy, enterectomy, Roemheld Syndrome, severe hernia, intestinal obstruction, intestinal ulcer.
- History of genetic galactose intolerance, Lapp lactase deficiency and glucose-galactose malabsorption.
- History of medullary thyroid carcinoma.
- Diagnosed and/or treated malignancy (except for basal cell skin cancer, in situ carcinoma of the cervix, or in situ prostate cancer) within the past 5 years.
- History of organ transplant or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS).
- History of alcohol abuse or illegal drug abuse within the past 12 months.
- Potentially unreliable patients and those judged by the Investigator to be unsuitable for the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical university
Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710032
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Exenatide vs. Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 on Glucose Variability in Type 2 Diabetes : a Randomised Open Parallel-controlled Study
This is a multi-centre, open-label, randomized, parallel trial to compare the effect of Exenatide versus Biphasic insulin Aspart 30 on glucose variability and inflammatory markers in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy.
Read the detailed description
Studies have showed that fluctuations of glucose seem to have more deleterious effects than sustained hyperglycaemia in the development of diabetic complications. The present randomized controlled trial was designed with primary aim to evaluate glycaemic fluctuation in the comparison between twice-daily Exenatide and other treatment paradigm (e.g. insulin Aspart 30).
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- Being tested
- Exenatide, Biphasic insulin Aspart 30
- Keywords
- Chinese population
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ExenatideDrug
Also called Byetta
Biphasic insulin Aspart 30Drug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Exenatide | Experimental | Exenatide (Colorless transparent liquid, comes in a prefilled pen.5ug/10ug, AstraZeneca) should be initiated, 60 minutes pre-breakfast and pre-supper, at 5ug twice a day for 4 weeks and then titrated up at 10ug twice a day until the completion of the study. Receives: Drug: Exenatide |
| Biphasic insulin Aspart 30 | Active comparator | Biphasic insulin Aspart 30 (Colorless transparent liquid, 100u/mL, 3ml each, Novo Nordisk), subcutaneous injection, starting at a dose of 0.2-0.4 IU/kg, or 10~12 IU/d assigned in pre-breakfast and pre-supper in a 1:1 ratio. The adjustment of insulin dose is instructed to achieve an optimal balance between glycaemic control and risk of hypoglycaemia as dictated by best clinical practice, titrated to glucose targets of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and pre-supper <7 mmol/L. Receives: Drug: Biphasic insulin Aspart 30 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change of mean amplitude of glycemic excursions
Measured: from baseline to Week 16
Secondary outcomes (11)
HbA1c
Measured: at baseline and Week 16
Hours of hypoglycemia as measured by continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS)
Measured: at baseline and Week 16
Blood pressure
Measured: at baseline and Week 16
Lipids
Measured: at baseline and Week 16
Body mass index
Measured: at baseline and Week 16
Waist circumference
Measured: at baseline and Week 16
Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1)
Measured: at baseline and Week 16
High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)
Measured: at baseline and Week 16
Urinary albumin
Measured: at baseline and Week 16
Number of participants with adverse events/severe adverse events
Measured: from baseline to Week 16
Number of participants with clinical hypoglycemia
Measured: from baseline to Week 16
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 May 2015 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2015
- Primary completionApr 2018
- Study completionApr 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Type 2 Diabetes MellitusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Xijing HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Xijing Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Air Force Military Medical University, China, First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Chang'An Hospital, Xi'an Gaoxin Hospital, Xi'an Central Hospital, Shaanxi Aerospace Hospital
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02449603
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ESR-14-10319
- Status last verified
- Nov 2018
- First submitted
- 11 May 2015
- Last updated
- 14 Nov 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Wang L, Liu X, Yang W, Lai J, Yu X, Liu J, Gao X, Ming J, Ma K, Xu J, Tian Z, He Q, Ji Q. Comparison of Blood Glucose Variability Between Exenatide and Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 in Chinese Participants with Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled with Metformin Monotherapy: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Trial. Diabetes Ther. 2020 Oct;11(10):2313-2328. doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00904-z. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
PubMed 32856226Xu S, Liu X, Ming J, Ji Q. Comparison of exenatide with biphasic insulin aspart 30 on glucose variability in type 2 diabetes: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016 Mar 24;17:160. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1258-8.
PubMed 27009108
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Nov 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Exenatide vs. Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 on Glucose Variability in Type 2 Diabetes : a Randomised Open Parallel-controlled Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02449603
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ESR-14-10319
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- Keywords
- Chinese population
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Xijing HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Air Force Military Medical University, China, First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Chang'An Hospital, Xi'an Gaoxin Hospital, Xi'an Central Hospital, Shaanxi Aerospace Hospital
- Study start
- Nov 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Apr 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 May 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a multi-centre, open-label, randomized, parallel trial to compare the effect of Exenatide versus Biphasic insulin Aspart 30 on glucose variability and inflammatory markers in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy.
Detailed description
Studies have showed that fluctuations of glucose seem to have more deleterious effects than sustained hyperglycaemia in the development of diabetic complications. The present randomized controlled trial was designed with primary aim to evaluate glycaemic fluctuation in the comparison between twice-daily Exenatide and other treatment paradigm (e.g. insulin Aspart 30).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Exenatide | Experimental | Drug: ExenatideExenatide (Colorless transparent liquid, comes in a prefilled pen.5ug/10ug, AstraZeneca) should be initiated, 60 minutes pre-breakfast and pre-supper, at 5ug twice a day for 4 weeks and then titrated up at 10ug twice a day until the completion of the study. |
| Biphasic insulin Aspart 30 | Active comparator | Drug: Biphasic insulin Aspart 30Biphasic insulin Aspart 30 (Colorless transparent liquid, 100u/mL, 3ml each, Novo Nordisk), subcutaneous injection, starting at a dose of 0.2-0.4 IU/kg, or 10~12 IU/d assigned in pre-breakfast and pre-supper in a 1:1 ratio. The adjustment of insulin dose is instructed to achieve an optimal balance between glycaemic control and risk of hypoglycaemia as dictated by best clinical practice, titrated to glucose targets of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and pre-supper <7 mmol/L. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Provision of informed consent prior to any study specific procedures.
- Men and women (non-pregnant and using a medically approved birth-control method) aged between 18 and 70 years at screening.
- Confirmed type 2 diabetes with history of at least half a year.
- Treatment with stable, maximum tolerated doses of metformin (≧1500mg/d, ≧3 months).
- HbA1c ≥ 7.5% and ≤ 10.0% at screening or within 4 weeks prior to screening (by local laboratory).
Key exclusion criteria (24 listed)
- Women who are pregnant, intending to become pregnant during the study period, currently lactating females, or women of child-bearing potential not using highly effective, medically approved birth control methods.
- Diagnosis or history of:
- Previous treatment with any dipeptide peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitor or glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists within the past one year.
- History of hypersensitivity reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis, angioedema, exfoliative skin conditions) to dipeptide peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4) or Acarbose.
- Treatment with any anti-diabetic medication for more than 7 consecutive days other than metformin in the last 3months prior to screening.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ExenatideAlso: Byetta | Drug | Exenatide |
| Biphasic insulin Aspart 30 | Drug | Biphasic insulin Aspart 30 |
Primary outcome
Change of mean amplitude of glycemic excursions
Time frame: from baseline to Week 16
11 secondary outcomes
HbA1c
Time frame: at baseline and Week 16
Hours of hypoglycemia as measured by continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS)
Time frame: at baseline and Week 16
Blood pressure
Time frame: at baseline and Week 16
Lipids
Time frame: at baseline and Week 16
Body mass index
Time frame: at baseline and Week 16
Waist circumference
Time frame: at baseline and Week 16
Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1)
Time frame: at baseline and Week 16
High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)
Time frame: at baseline and Week 16
Urinary albumin
Time frame: at baseline and Week 16
Number of participants with adverse events/severe adverse events
Time frame: from baseline to Week 16
Number of participants with clinical hypoglycemia
Time frame: from baseline to Week 16
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Nov 2018.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32856226Wang L, Liu X, Yang W, Lai J, Yu X, Liu J, Gao X, Ming J, Ma K, Xu J, Tian Z, He Q, Ji Q. Comparison of Blood Glucose Variability Between Exenatide and Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 in Chinese Participants with Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled with Metformin Monotherapy: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Trial. Diabetes Ther. 2020 Oct;11(10):2313-2328. doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00904-z. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27009108Xu S, Liu X, Ming J, Ji Q. Comparison of exenatide with biphasic insulin aspart 30 on glucose variability in type 2 diabetes: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016 Mar 24;17:160. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1258-8.
Related trials for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) in Obese Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D), Obesity (BMI>30)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Exenatide and Biphasic insulin Aspart 30 in people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Xijing Hospital at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 24 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Nov 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change of mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (time frame: from baseline to Week 16). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02449603, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Nov 2018.