AzTrials
AzTrials

Active Systemic Lupus ErythematosusPhase 3NCT02446912

Efficacy and Safety of Two Doses of Anifrolumab Compared to Placebo in Adult Subjects With Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

A Phase 3 study testing Anifrolumab in people with Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, run by AstraZeneca at 145 sites in 18 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an intravenous treatment regimen of two doses of anifrolumab versus placebo in adult subjects with moderately to severely active, autoantibody-positive systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
What is being tested?
Anifrolumab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
460 participants
Where
145 sitesin 18 countries
Study dates
9 Jun 2015to 17 Jul 2018
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Aged 18 through 70 years at the time of screening
  • Diagnosis of paediatric or adult SLE with a diagnosis of SLE according to the ACR 1982 revised criteria ≥24 weeks prior to signing the Informed Consent form (ICF)
  • Currently receiving at least 1 of the following:
  • Where prednisone is the single standard of care medication (ie, the subject is not concurrently receiving any medication listed in inclusion criterion 3(c)), a dose of oral prednisone ≥7.5 mg/day but ≤40 mg/day (or prednisone equivalent) for a minimum of 8 weeks prior to Day 1. In addition, the dose of oral prednisone or prednisone equivalent the subject is taking must be stable for a minimum of 2 weeks prior to randomisation.
  • Where prednisone is not the single standard of care medication (ie, the subject is concurrently receiving at least one medication listed in inclusion criterion 3(c)), a dose of oral prednisone (≤40 mg/day) (or prednisone equivalent) for a minimum of 2 weeks prior to signing of the ICF. In addition, the dose of oral prednisone or prednisone equivalent the subject is taking must be stable for a minimum of 2 weeks prior to randomisation.
  • Any of the following medications administered for a minimum of 12 weeks prior to signing the informed consent, and at a stable dose for a minimum of 8 weeks prior to signing the informed consent through Day 1:
Show all 18Show fewer
  • Azathioprine ≤200 mg/day (ii) Antimalarial (eg, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, quinacrine) (iii) Mycophenolate mofetil ≤2 g/day or mycophenolic acid ≤1.44 g/day (iv) Oral, subcutaneous (SC), or intramuscular methotrexate ≤25 mg/week (v) Mizoribine ≤150 mg/day
  • Fulfils at least 4 of the 11 ACR modified 1982 classification criteria for SLE, at least 1 of which must be:
  • Positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) test at screening by immunofluorescent assay (IFA) at the central laboratory with titre ≥1:80; OR
  • Anti-dsDNA antibodies at screening elevated to above normal (including indeterminante), as per the central laboratory; OR
  • Anti-Smith (anti-Sm) antibody at screening elevated to above normal as per the central laboratory.
  • At Screening, Disease Activity Adjudication Group confirmation of:
  • SLEDAI-2K Criteria: SLEDAI-2K score ≥6 points and "Clinical" SLEDAI-2K score ≥4 points. The "Clinical" SLEDAI-2K is the SLEDAI-2K assessment score without the inclusion of points attributable to any urine or laboratory results including immunologic measures.
  • Must not have active or latent TB on either chest radiograph or by quantiferon gold test
  • Day 1 "Clinical" SLEDAI-2K score ≥4 points
  • OCS dose stable for at least 2 weeks prior to randomisation
  • Stable SLE SOC treatment at the time of randomisation
  • Women of child-bearing potential must have a negative serum β-hCG test and negative urine pregnancy test at randomisation (Day 1) prior to administration of investigational product

Who cannot join

  • Receipt of any investigational product (small molecule or biologic agent) within 4 weeks or 5 half-lives prior to signing of the ICF, whichever is greater
  • Receipt of any of the following:
  • Intra-articular, intramuscular or IV glucocorticosteroids within 6 weeks prior to Day 1
  • History of, or current diagnosis of, a clinically significant non SLE-related vasculitis syndrome.
  • Active severe or unstable neuropsychiatric SLE
  • Active severe SLE-driven renal disease
Show all 16Show fewer
  • Diagnosis (within 1 year of signing the ICF) of mixed connective tissue disease or any history of overlap syndromes of SLE or SSc.
  • History of, or current, inflammatory joint or skin disease other than SLE
  • History of any non-SLE disease that has required treatment with oral or parenteral corticosteroids for more than 2 weeks within the last 24 weeks prior to signing the ICF
  • Known history of a primary immunodeficiency, splenectomy, or any underlying condition that predisposes the subject to infection, or a positive result for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection confirmed by central laboratory at screening. Subjects refusing HIV testing during the screening period will not be eligible for study participation
  • Confirmed positive test for hepatitis B or hepatitis C
  • Any severe herpes infection at any time prior to Week 0 (Day 1)
  • Opportunistic infection requiring hospitalisation or intravenous antimicrobial treatment within 3 years prior to randomization
  • History of cancer, apart from:
  • Squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin that has been successfully treated
  • Cervical cancer in situ that has been successfully treated

Trial locations and contacts

145 sites in 18 countries.

145 sites in 18 countries

United States52 sites
  • Research Site

    Amarillo, Texas, 79124

  • Research Site

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

  • Research Site

    Austin, Texas, 78731

  • Research Site

    Austin, Texas, 78745

  • Research Site

    Aventura, Florida, 33180

  • Research Site

    Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70809

  • Research Site

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35233

  • Research Site

    Boise, Idaho, 83712

  • Research Site

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29406

  • Research Site

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29407

  • Research Site

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29425

  • Research Site

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204

  • Research Site

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210

  • Research Site

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44109

  • Research Site

    Dallas, Texas, 75231

  • Research Site

    Decatur, Georgia, 30033

  • Research Site

    El Cajon, California, 91942-3191

  • Research Site

    Freehold, New Jersey, 07728

  • Research Site

    Glendale, Wisconsin, 53217

  • Research Site

    Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49546

  • Research Site

    Great Neck, New York, 11021

  • Research Site

    Hagerstown, Maryland, 21502

  • Research Site

    Hagerstown, Maryland, 21740

  • Research Site

    Houston, Texas, 77074

  • Research Site

    Houston, Texas, 77099

  • Research Site

    Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83404

  • Research Site

    Jackson, Tennessee, 38305

  • Research Site

    La Jolla, California, 92037-0706

  • Research Site

    Lawrenceville, Georgia, 30046

  • Research Site

    Los Alamitos, California, 90720

  • Research Site

    Marietta, Georgia, 30060

  • Research Site

    Memphis, Tennessee, 38119

  • Research Site

    Mesquite, Texas, 75150

  • Research Site

    Miami, Florida, 33136

  • Research Site

    Middleburg Heights, Ohio, 44130

  • Research Site

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455-0341

  • Research Site

    Nashua, New Hampshire, 03060

  • Research Site

    New Hyde Park, New York, 11042

  • Research Site

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73101

  • Research Site

    Orlando, Florida, 32804

  • Research Site

    Orlando, Florida, 32806

  • Research Site

    Ormond Beach, Florida, 32174

  • Research Site

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19140

  • Research Site

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15224

  • Research Site

    Plantation, Florida, 33324

  • Research Site

    Raleigh, North Carolina, 27617

  • Research Site

    San Antonio, Texas, 78232

  • Research Site

    Tampa, Florida, 33614

  • Research Site

    Thousand Oaks, California, 91360

  • Research Site

    Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74104

  • Research Site

    Vero Beach, Florida, 32960

  • Research Site

    Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, 19610

Other trials in United States

Poland14 sites
  • Research Site

    Bialystok, 15-297

  • Research Site

    Bydgoszcz, 85-168

  • Research Site

    Elblag, 82-300

  • Research Site

    Krakow, 31-011

  • Research Site

    Lublin, 20-582

  • Research Site

    Nadarzyn, 05-830

  • Research Site

    Poznan, 60-773

  • Research Site

    Poznan, 61-397

  • Research Site

    Sosnowiec, 41-200

  • Research Site

    Starachowice, 27-200

  • Research Site

    Szczecin, 71-252

  • Research Site

    Ustroń, 43-450

  • Research Site

    Warsaw, 02-118

  • Research Site

    Warsaw, 50-088

Other trials in Poland

Ukraine9 sites
  • Research Site

    Kiev, 03680

  • Research Site

    Kyiv, 01601

  • Research Site

    Kyiv, 02002

  • Research Site

    Lviv, 79010

  • Research Site

    Lviv, 79011

  • Research Site

    Ternopil, 46002

  • Research Site

    Uzhhorod, 88000

  • Research Site

    Vinnytsia, 21018

  • Research Site

    Zaporizhzhya, 69600

Other trials in Ukraine

Peru7 sites
  • Research Site

    Arequipa, 54

  • Research Site

    Lima, 15023

  • Research Site

    Lima, 15033

  • Research Site

    Lima, 15046

  • Research Site

    Lima, 15073

  • Research Site

    Lima, LIMA 01

  • Research Site

    Lima, LIMA 31

Other trials in Peru

Romania7 sites
  • Research Site

    Brasov, 500283

  • Research Site

    Bucharest, 010584

  • Research Site

    Bucharest, 011172

  • Research Site

    Bucharest, 020475

  • Research Site

    Cluj-Napoca, 400006

  • Research Site

    Galati, 800578

  • Research Site

    Tg Mures, 540136

Other trials in Romania

United Kingdom7 sites
  • Research Site

    Brighton, BN2 5BE

  • Research Site

    Doncaster, DN2 5LT

  • Research Site

    Leeds, LS7 4SA

  • Research Site

    London, SE1 2PR

  • Research Site

    Manchester, M13 9WL

  • Research Site

    Romford, RM7 0AG

  • Research Site

    Staffordshire, WS11 5XY

Other trials in United Kingdom

Colombia6 sites
  • Research Site

    Armenia, 630004

  • Research Site

    Barranquilla, 0

  • Research Site

    Bogotá, 110221

  • Research Site

    Bogotá, 111211

  • Research Site

    Bucaramanga, 680003

  • Research Site

    Medellín, 050021

Other trials in Colombia

Germany6 sites
  • Research Site

    Berlin, 10117

  • Research Site

    Cologne, 50937

  • Research Site

    Dessau-RoBlau, 06847

  • Research Site

    Frankfurt am Main, 60528

  • Research Site

    Göttingen, 37075

  • Research Site

    Kirchheim, 73230

Other trials in Germany

Israel6 sites
  • Research Site

    Haifa, 31048

  • Research Site

    Haifa, 3109601

  • Research Site

    Jerusalem, 9122001

  • Research Site

    Kfar Saba, 49281

  • Research Site

    Petah Tikva, 49100

  • Research Site

    Tel Aviv, 64239

Other trials in Israel

South Korea6 sites
  • Research Site

    Daejeon, 301-721

  • Research Site

    Gwangju, 61469

  • Research Site

    Jeonju, 54907

  • Research Site

    Seoul, 03080

  • Research Site

    Seoul, 150-713

  • Research Site

    Suwon, 61469

Other trials in South Korea

Brazil4 sites
  • Research Site

    Belo Horizonte, 30150-221

  • Research Site

    Juiz de Fora, 36010-570

  • Research Site

    Porto Alegre, 90560-030

  • Research Site

    Salvador, 40150-150

Other trials in Brazil

Hungary4 sites
  • Research Site

    Budapest, 1097

  • Research Site

    Debrecen, 4032

  • Research Site

    Szeged, 6725

  • Research Site

    Zalaegerszeg, 8900

Other trials in Hungary

Taiwan4 sites
  • Research Site

    Kaohsiung Hsien, 83342

  • Research Site

    Taichung, 404

  • Research Site

    Taichung, 40705

  • Research Site

    Taipei, 10002

Other trials in Taiwan

Australia3 sites
  • Research Site

    Fitzroy, 3065

  • Research Site

    Kogarah, 2217

  • Research Site

    St Leonards, 2065

Other trials in Australia

Chile3 sites
  • Research Site

    Osorno, 5311092

  • Research Site

    Santiago, 8320000

  • Research Site

    Viña del Mar, 2520997

Other trials in Chile

Italy3 sites
  • Research Site

    Milan, 20132

  • Research Site

    Milan, 20157

  • Research Site

    Padova, 35128

Other trials in Italy

Argentina2 sites
  • Research Site

    Córdoba, X5004AUL

  • Research Site

    San Miguel de Tucumán, T4000AXL

Other trials in Argentina

New Zealand2 sites
  • Research Site

    Hamilton, 3204

  • Research Site

    Wellington, 6021

Other trials in New Zealand

About this study

Official title: A Multicentre, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Two Doses of Anifrolumab in Adult Subjects With Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an intravenous treatment regimen of two doses of anifrolumab versus placebo in adult subjects with moderately to severely active, autoantibody-positive systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Read the detailed description

This is a Phase 3, multicentre, multinational, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an intravenous treatment regimen of two doses of anifrolumab versus placebo in subjects with moderately to severely active, autoantibody-positive systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) while receiving standard of care (SOC) treatment. The study will be performed in adult subjects aged 18 to 70 years of age.

Being tested
Anifrolumab, Placebo
Keywords
Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AnifrolumabBiological

    Anifrolumab IV administration every 4 weeks from Week 0 to Week 48 for a total of 13 doses

  • PlaceboDrug

    Placebo IV administration every 4 weeks from Week 0 to Week 48

Study groups in NCT02446912
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Anifrolumab - higher doseExperimentalAnifrolumab
Receives: Biological: Anifrolumab
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorPlacebo
Receives: Drug: Placebo
Anifrolumab - lower doseExperimentalAnifrolumab
Receives: Biological: Anifrolumab

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index ≥4 (SRI[4]) at Week 52 (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)

    SRI(4) was defined as meeting all of the following criteria:

    Reduction from baseline of ≥4 points in the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) No new organ systems affected, defined by 1 or more British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG-2004) A or 2 or more BILAG-2004 B items No worsening from baseline in participants lupus disease activity. Worsening was defined as an increase of ≥0.30 points on a 3-point Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) visual analogue scale (VAS) No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the pre-specified analysis threshold.

    Measured: Week 52

Secondary outcomes (15)
  1. Number of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index of ≥4 at Week 52 in the Interferon (IFN) Test-High Sub-Group (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)

    SRI(4) was defined as meeting all of the following criteria:

    Reduction from baseline of ≥4 points in the SLEDAI-2K No new organ systems affected, defined by 1 or more BILAG-2004 A or 2 or more BILAG-2004 B No worsening from baseline in participants lupus disease activity. Worsening was defined as an increase of ≥0.30 points on a 3-point PGA VAS No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the pre-specified analysis threshold.

    Measured: Week 52

  2. Number of Participants Who Achieved and Maintained an Oral Corticosteroid (OCS) Dose of ≤7.5 mg/Day in the Sub-group of Participants With Baseline OCS ≥10 mg/Day (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)

    Maintained OCS reduction was defined by meeting all the following criteria:

    Achieve an OCS dose of ≤7.5 mg/day prednisone or equivalent by Week 40 Maintain an OCS dose ≤7.5 mg/day prednisone or equivalent from Week 40 to Week 52 No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the pre-specified analysis threshold.

    Measured: Week 52

  3. Number of Participants With a ≥50% Reduction in CLASI Activity Score at Week 12 in the Sub-group of Participants With Baseline CLASI Activity Score ≥10 (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)

    50% reduction in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) activity score compared to baseline was defined by meeting all of the following criteria:

    Achieve ≥50% reduction of CLASI activity score at Week 12 compared to baseline No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the pre-specified analysis threshold before assessment.

    Measured: Week 12

  4. Number of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index of ≥4 (SRI[4]) at Week 24 (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)

    SRI(4) was defined as meeting all of the following criteria:

    Reduction from baseline of ≥4 points in the SLEDAI-2K No new organ systems affected as defined by 1 or more BILAG-2004 A or 2 or more BILAG-2004 B items No worsening from baseline in participants lupus disease activity. Worsening was defined as an increase of ≥0.30 points on a 3-point PGA VAS No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the pre-specified threshold.

    Measured: Week 24

  5. Annualized Flare Rate

    A flare was defined as either 1 or more new British Isle Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG-2004) A or 2 or more new BILAG-2004 B items compared to the previous visit. The occurrence of a new flare was checked for each available visit versus the previous available visit up to Week 52. If no new flares occurred, the number of flares was set to 0. Otherwise all flares were counted leading to the maximum number of flares of 13. The annualized flare rate was calculated as the number of flares divided by the flare exposure time in days multiplied with 365.25 (1 year). The flare exposure time is the time up to Week 52 (date of BILAG-2004 assessment at Week 52) or up to the date of last available BILAG-2004 assessment.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 52

  6. Number of Participants Who Met the Criteria for British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)

    A BICLA responder was achieved if all of the following criteria was met:

    All criteria related to SRI(4) (please see primary endpoint) plus:

    Reduction of all baseline BILAG-2004 A to B/C/D and baseline BILAG-2004 B to C/D, and no BILAG-2004 worsening in other organ systems, as defined by 1 or more BILAG-2004 A or 1 or more new BILAG-2004 B item No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the revised post-hoc analysis threshold before assessment.

    Measured: Week 52

  7. Number of Participants Reporting One or More Adverse Events (AE)

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. AEs were collected throughout the duration of the study, from baseline until end of follow-up (a maximum of 12 weeks post last dose [Week 48]), or until Week 52 for participants who enrolled onto the long term extension (LTE). The reported value is inclusive of serious and non-serious AEs.

    Measured: Baseline to End of Trial (Maximum of 60 weeks)

  8. Number of Participants Reporting One or More Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)

    An AESI is an AE of scientific and medical concern specific to understanding biologics and requires close monitoring and rapid communication by the Investigator to the Sponsor/Sponsor's delegate. An AESI may be serious or nonserious. The events of interest are serious infections, including non opportunistic serious infections, opportunistic infections, anaphylaxis, malignancy, herpes zoster, TB (including latent TB), influenza, vasculitis (non-SLE), and MACE (including stroke, MI, or cardiovascular death).

    AEs were collected throughout the duration of the study, from baseline until end of follow-up (a maximum of 12 weeks post last dose [Week 48]), or until Week 52 for participants who enrolled onto the long term extension (LTE).

    Measured: Baseline to End of Trial (Maximum of 60 weeks)

  9. Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Vital Signs

    Vital signs included oral temperature, blood pressure (BP), pulse rate, and respiratory rate.

    Vital signs were collected throughout the duration of the study, from baseline until end of follow-up (a maximum of 12 weeks post last dose [Week 48]), or until Week 52 for participants who enrolled onto the long term extension (LTE).

    Measured: Baseline to End of Trial (Maximum of 60 weeks)

  10. Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Physical Examinations

    Physical examinations included height and weight. Participants were weighed at each study visit and any medically significant changes were reported.

    Physical examination values were collected throughout the duration of the study, from baseline until end of follow-up (a maximum of 12 weeks post last dose [Week 48]), or until Week 52 for participants who enrolled onto the long term extension (LTE).

    Measured: Baseline to End of Trial (Maximum of 60 weeks)

  11. Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Scores

    ECGs documented the date, time, heart rate, QRS duration, PR interval, RR interval, QT, and corrected QT interval, which were calculated using the Fridericia formula. The investigator judged the overall interpretation as normal or abnormal, and if abnormal it was decided as to whether or not the abnormality was clinically significant or not clinically significant.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 52

  12. Number of Participants With Mild To Moderate Lupus Flare Evaluated by Modified Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment (SELENA)-SLEDAI Flare Index

    The modified SELENA flare index was completed by the Investigator or delegated/qualified physician. Assessment of flares were scored in comparison to the participant's previous visit and should only include findings which, in the opinion of the Investigator, are due to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity within that timeframe. Flare was defined as any 1 criterion present in either the Mild/Moderate Flare or Severe Flare categories.

    Number of flares were collected throughout the duration of the study, from baseline until end of follow-up (a maximum of 12 weeks post last dose [Week 48]), or until Week 52 for participants who enrolled onto the long term extension (LTE).

    Measured: Baseline to End of Trial (Maximum of 60 weeks)

  13. Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Tests

    Laboratory tests were collected at central clinical laboratories and included hematology, serum chemistry and urinalysis tests. Laboratory values were collected throughout the duration of the study, from baseline until end of follow-up (a maximum of 12 weeks post last dose [Week 48]), or until Week 52 for participants who enrolled onto the long term extension (LTE).

    Measured: Baseline to End of Trial (Maximum of 60 weeks)

  14. Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behaviour Assessed Via the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)

    The C-SSRS is an assessment tool that evaluates suicidal ideation and behavior. Number of participants with suicidal ideation or behavior was defined as the number of participants who answered "yes" at any time during the treatment period (Baseline to Week 52) to one of the 10 categories:

    Category 1: Wish to be dead Category 2: Non-specific active suicidal thoughts Category 3: Active suicidal ideation with any methods (not plan) without intent to act Category 4: Active suicidal ideation with some intent to act, without specific plan Category 5: Active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent Category 6: Preparatory acts or behavior Category 7: Aborted attempt Category 8: Interrupted attempt Category 9: Actual attempt (non-fatal) Category 10: Completed suicide

    Measured: Baseline to Week 52

  15. Change From Baseline in Personal Health Questionnaire Depression Scale-8 (PHQ-8) Score

    PHQ-8 is a 8-item self-report scale, all items are rated on a score of 0-3, for a total range of 0-24. PHQ-8 assesses symptoms of depression over the previous 2 weeks. Higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 52

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 May 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start9 Jun 2015
  3. Primary completion17 Jul 2018
  4. Study completion17 Jul 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
460 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02446912
Sponsor's protocol ID
D3461C00005
Status last verified
Dec 2022
First submitted
14 May 2015
Last updated
12 Jan 2023
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Brunner HI, Cody EM, Devarajan P, Huang B, Chen C, Sinibaldi D, Ramaswamy M, Knagenhjelm J, Jones F, Brohawn PZ, Tummala R, Lindholm C, White WI. The Renal Activity Index for Lupus Identifies Active Renal Disease and Treatment Response in Adult Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Lupus Nephritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2026 Jun;78(6):723-732. doi: 10.1002/acr.25684. Epub 2026 Feb 23.

    PubMed 41144892
  • Furie RA, Morand EF, Bruce IN, Manzi S, Kalunian KC, Vital EM, Lawrence Ford T, Gupta R, Hiepe F, Santiago M, Brohawn PZ, Berglind A, Tummala R; TULIP-1 study investigators. Type I interferon inhibitor anifrolumab in active systemic lupus erythematosus (TULIP-1): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Rheumatol. 2019 Dec;1(4):e208-e219. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(19)30076-1. Epub 2019 Nov 11.

    PubMed 38229377
  • Morand EF, Abreu G, Furie RA, Golder V, Tummala R. Lupus low disease activity state attainment in the phase 3 TULIP trials of anifrolumab in active systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023 May;82(5):639-645. doi: 10.1136/ard-2022-222748. Epub 2023 Jan 23.

    PubMed 36690388
  • Bruce IN, van Vollenhoven RF, Morand EF, Furie RA, Manzi S, White WB, Abreu G, Tummala R. Sustained glucocorticoid tapering in the phase 3 trials of anifrolumab: a post hoc analysis of the TULIP-1 and TULIP-2 trials. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023 Apr 3;62(4):1526-1534. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac491.

    PubMed 36018235
  • Bruce IN, Furie RA, Morand EF, Manzi S, Tanaka Y, Kalunian KC, Merrill JT, Puzio P, Maho E, Kleoudis C, Albulescu M, Hultquist M, Tummala R. Concordance and discordance in SLE clinical trial outcome measures: analysis of three anifrolumab phase 2/3 trials. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022 Jul;81(7):962-969. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-221847. Epub 2022 May 17.

    PubMed 35580976
  • Vital EM, Merrill JT, Morand EF, Furie RA, Bruce IN, Tanaka Y, Manzi S, Kalunian KC, Kalyani RN, Streicher K, Abreu G, Tummala R. Anifrolumab efficacy and safety by type I interferon gene signature and clinical subgroups in patients with SLE: post hoc analysis of pooled data from two phase III trials. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022 Jul;81(7):951-961. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-221425. Epub 2022 Mar 25.

    PubMed 35338035
  • Loncharich MF, Anderson CW. Interferon Inhibition for Lupus with Anifrolumab: Critical Appraisal of the Evidence Leading to FDA Approval. ACR Open Rheumatol. 2022 Jun;4(6):486-491. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11414. Epub 2022 Feb 14.

    PubMed 35157371
  • Chia YL, Zhang J, Tummala R, Rouse T, Furie RA, Morand EF. Relationship of anifrolumab pharmacokinetics with efficacy and safety in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 May 5;61(5):1900-1910. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab704.

    PubMed 34528084
  • Furie R, Morand EF, Askanase AD, Vital EM, Merrill JT, Kalyani RN, Abreu G, Pineda L, Tummala R. Anifrolumab reduces flare rates in patients with moderate to severe systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2021 Jul;30(8):1254-1263. doi: 10.1177/09612033211014267. Epub 2021 May 12.

    PubMed 33977796
  • Furie R, Morand EF, Bruce IN, Isenberg D, van Vollenhoven R, Abreu G, Pineda L, Tummala R. What Does It Mean to Be a British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-Based Composite Lupus Assessment Responder? Post Hoc Analysis of Two Phase III Trials. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021 Nov;73(11):2059-2068. doi: 10.1002/art.41778. Epub 2021 Sep 22.

    PubMed 33913260
  • Hannon CW, McCourt C, Lima HC, Chen S, Bennett C. Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 9;3(3):CD007478. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007478.pub2.

    PubMed 33687069

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Anifrolumab in people with Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, run by AstraZeneca at 145 sites in 18 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 18 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jan 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 145 sites in United States, Poland, Ukraine, Peru, Romania and 13 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Dec 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index ≥4 (SRI[4]) at Week 52 (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules) (time frame: Week 52). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02446912, which also lists 11 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jan 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in