Active Systemic Lupus ErythematosusPhase 3NCT02446912
Efficacy and Safety of Two Doses of Anifrolumab Compared to Placebo in Adult Subjects With Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
A Phase 3 study testing Anifrolumab in people with Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, run by AstraZeneca at 145 sites in 18 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an intravenous treatment regimen of two doses of anifrolumab versus placebo in adult subjects with moderately to severely active, autoantibody-positive systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- What is being tested?
- Anifrolumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 460 participants
- Where
- 145 sitesin 18 countries
- Study dates
- 9 Jun 2015to 17 Jul 2018
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged 18 through 70 years at the time of screening
- Diagnosis of paediatric or adult SLE with a diagnosis of SLE according to the ACR 1982 revised criteria ≥24 weeks prior to signing the Informed Consent form (ICF)
- Currently receiving at least 1 of the following:
- Where prednisone is the single standard of care medication (ie, the subject is not concurrently receiving any medication listed in inclusion criterion 3(c)), a dose of oral prednisone ≥7.5 mg/day but ≤40 mg/day (or prednisone equivalent) for a minimum of 8 weeks prior to Day 1. In addition, the dose of oral prednisone or prednisone equivalent the subject is taking must be stable for a minimum of 2 weeks prior to randomisation.
- Where prednisone is not the single standard of care medication (ie, the subject is concurrently receiving at least one medication listed in inclusion criterion 3(c)), a dose of oral prednisone (≤40 mg/day) (or prednisone equivalent) for a minimum of 2 weeks prior to signing of the ICF. In addition, the dose of oral prednisone or prednisone equivalent the subject is taking must be stable for a minimum of 2 weeks prior to randomisation.
- Any of the following medications administered for a minimum of 12 weeks prior to signing the informed consent, and at a stable dose for a minimum of 8 weeks prior to signing the informed consent through Day 1:
Show all 18Show fewer
- Azathioprine ≤200 mg/day (ii) Antimalarial (eg, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, quinacrine) (iii) Mycophenolate mofetil ≤2 g/day or mycophenolic acid ≤1.44 g/day (iv) Oral, subcutaneous (SC), or intramuscular methotrexate ≤25 mg/week (v) Mizoribine ≤150 mg/day
- Fulfils at least 4 of the 11 ACR modified 1982 classification criteria for SLE, at least 1 of which must be:
- Positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) test at screening by immunofluorescent assay (IFA) at the central laboratory with titre ≥1:80; OR
- Anti-dsDNA antibodies at screening elevated to above normal (including indeterminante), as per the central laboratory; OR
- Anti-Smith (anti-Sm) antibody at screening elevated to above normal as per the central laboratory.
- At Screening, Disease Activity Adjudication Group confirmation of:
- SLEDAI-2K Criteria: SLEDAI-2K score ≥6 points and "Clinical" SLEDAI-2K score ≥4 points. The "Clinical" SLEDAI-2K is the SLEDAI-2K assessment score without the inclusion of points attributable to any urine or laboratory results including immunologic measures.
- Must not have active or latent TB on either chest radiograph or by quantiferon gold test
- Day 1 "Clinical" SLEDAI-2K score ≥4 points
- OCS dose stable for at least 2 weeks prior to randomisation
- Stable SLE SOC treatment at the time of randomisation
- Women of child-bearing potential must have a negative serum β-hCG test and negative urine pregnancy test at randomisation (Day 1) prior to administration of investigational product
Who cannot join
- Receipt of any investigational product (small molecule or biologic agent) within 4 weeks or 5 half-lives prior to signing of the ICF, whichever is greater
- Receipt of any of the following:
- Intra-articular, intramuscular or IV glucocorticosteroids within 6 weeks prior to Day 1
- History of, or current diagnosis of, a clinically significant non SLE-related vasculitis syndrome.
- Active severe or unstable neuropsychiatric SLE
- Active severe SLE-driven renal disease
Show all 16Show fewer
- Diagnosis (within 1 year of signing the ICF) of mixed connective tissue disease or any history of overlap syndromes of SLE or SSc.
- History of, or current, inflammatory joint or skin disease other than SLE
- History of any non-SLE disease that has required treatment with oral or parenteral corticosteroids for more than 2 weeks within the last 24 weeks prior to signing the ICF
- Known history of a primary immunodeficiency, splenectomy, or any underlying condition that predisposes the subject to infection, or a positive result for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection confirmed by central laboratory at screening. Subjects refusing HIV testing during the screening period will not be eligible for study participation
- Confirmed positive test for hepatitis B or hepatitis C
- Any severe herpes infection at any time prior to Week 0 (Day 1)
- Opportunistic infection requiring hospitalisation or intravenous antimicrobial treatment within 3 years prior to randomization
- History of cancer, apart from:
- Squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin that has been successfully treated
- Cervical cancer in situ that has been successfully treated
Trial locations and contacts
145 sites in 18 countries.
145 sites in 18 countries
United States52 sites
Research Site
Amarillo, Texas, 79124
Research Site
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Research Site
Austin, Texas, 78731
Research Site
Austin, Texas, 78745
Research Site
Aventura, Florida, 33180
Research Site
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70809
Research Site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233
Research Site
Boise, Idaho, 83712
Research Site
Charleston, South Carolina, 29406
Research Site
Charleston, South Carolina, 29407
Research Site
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
Research Site
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204
Research Site
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210
Research Site
Cleveland, Ohio, 44109
Research Site
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Research Site
Decatur, Georgia, 30033
Research Site
El Cajon, California, 91942-3191
Research Site
Freehold, New Jersey, 07728
Research Site
Glendale, Wisconsin, 53217
Research Site
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49546
Research Site
Great Neck, New York, 11021
Research Site
Hagerstown, Maryland, 21502
Research Site
Hagerstown, Maryland, 21740
Research Site
Houston, Texas, 77074
Research Site
Houston, Texas, 77099
Research Site
Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83404
Research Site
Jackson, Tennessee, 38305
Research Site
La Jolla, California, 92037-0706
Research Site
Lawrenceville, Georgia, 30046
Research Site
Los Alamitos, California, 90720
Research Site
Marietta, Georgia, 30060
Research Site
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119
Research Site
Mesquite, Texas, 75150
Research Site
Miami, Florida, 33136
Research Site
Middleburg Heights, Ohio, 44130
Research Site
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455-0341
Research Site
Nashua, New Hampshire, 03060
Research Site
New Hyde Park, New York, 11042
Research Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73101
Research Site
Orlando, Florida, 32804
Research Site
Orlando, Florida, 32806
Research Site
Ormond Beach, Florida, 32174
Research Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19140
Research Site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15224
Research Site
Plantation, Florida, 33324
Research Site
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27617
Research Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78232
Research Site
Tampa, Florida, 33614
Research Site
Thousand Oaks, California, 91360
Research Site
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74104
Research Site
Vero Beach, Florida, 32960
Research Site
Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, 19610
Poland14 sites
Research Site
Bialystok, 15-297
Research Site
Bydgoszcz, 85-168
Research Site
Elblag, 82-300
Research Site
Krakow, 31-011
Research Site
Lublin, 20-582
Research Site
Nadarzyn, 05-830
Research Site
Poznan, 60-773
Research Site
Poznan, 61-397
Research Site
Sosnowiec, 41-200
Research Site
Starachowice, 27-200
Research Site
Szczecin, 71-252
Research Site
Ustroń, 43-450
Research Site
Warsaw, 02-118
Research Site
Warsaw, 50-088
Ukraine9 sites
Research Site
Kiev, 03680
Research Site
Kyiv, 01601
Research Site
Kyiv, 02002
Research Site
Lviv, 79010
Research Site
Lviv, 79011
Research Site
Ternopil, 46002
Research Site
Uzhhorod, 88000
Research Site
Vinnytsia, 21018
Research Site
Zaporizhzhya, 69600
Peru7 sites
Research Site
Arequipa, 54
Research Site
Lima, 15023
Research Site
Lima, 15033
Research Site
Lima, 15046
Research Site
Lima, 15073
Research Site
Lima, LIMA 01
Research Site
Lima, LIMA 31
Romania7 sites
Research Site
Brasov, 500283
Research Site
Bucharest, 010584
Research Site
Bucharest, 011172
Research Site
Bucharest, 020475
Research Site
Cluj-Napoca, 400006
Research Site
Galati, 800578
Research Site
Tg Mures, 540136
United Kingdom7 sites
Research Site
Brighton, BN2 5BE
Research Site
Doncaster, DN2 5LT
Research Site
Leeds, LS7 4SA
Research Site
London, SE1 2PR
Research Site
Manchester, M13 9WL
Research Site
Romford, RM7 0AG
Research Site
Staffordshire, WS11 5XY
Colombia6 sites
Research Site
Armenia, 630004
Research Site
Barranquilla, 0
Research Site
Bogotá, 110221
Research Site
Bogotá, 111211
Research Site
Bucaramanga, 680003
Research Site
Medellín, 050021
Germany6 sites
Research Site
Berlin, 10117
Research Site
Cologne, 50937
Research Site
Dessau-RoBlau, 06847
Research Site
Frankfurt am Main, 60528
Research Site
Göttingen, 37075
Research Site
Kirchheim, 73230
Israel6 sites
Research Site
Haifa, 31048
Research Site
Haifa, 3109601
Research Site
Jerusalem, 9122001
Research Site
Kfar Saba, 49281
Research Site
Petah Tikva, 49100
Research Site
Tel Aviv, 64239
South Korea6 sites
Research Site
Daejeon, 301-721
Research Site
Gwangju, 61469
Research Site
Jeonju, 54907
Research Site
Seoul, 03080
Research Site
Seoul, 150-713
Research Site
Suwon, 61469
Brazil4 sites
Research Site
Belo Horizonte, 30150-221
Research Site
Juiz de Fora, 36010-570
Research Site
Porto Alegre, 90560-030
Research Site
Salvador, 40150-150
Hungary4 sites
Research Site
Budapest, 1097
Research Site
Debrecen, 4032
Research Site
Szeged, 6725
Research Site
Zalaegerszeg, 8900
Taiwan4 sites
Research Site
Kaohsiung Hsien, 83342
Research Site
Taichung, 404
Research Site
Taichung, 40705
Research Site
Taipei, 10002
Australia3 sites
Research Site
Fitzroy, 3065
Research Site
Kogarah, 2217
Research Site
St Leonards, 2065
Chile3 sites
Research Site
Osorno, 5311092
Research Site
Santiago, 8320000
Research Site
Viña del Mar, 2520997
Italy3 sites
Research Site
Milan, 20132
Research Site
Milan, 20157
Research Site
Padova, 35128
Argentina2 sites
Research Site
Córdoba, X5004AUL
Research Site
San Miguel de Tucumán, T4000AXL
New Zealand2 sites
Research Site
Hamilton, 3204
Research Site
Wellington, 6021
About this study
Official title: A Multicentre, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Two Doses of Anifrolumab in Adult Subjects With Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an intravenous treatment regimen of two doses of anifrolumab versus placebo in adult subjects with moderately to severely active, autoantibody-positive systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
Read the detailed description
This is a Phase 3, multicentre, multinational, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an intravenous treatment regimen of two doses of anifrolumab versus placebo in subjects with moderately to severely active, autoantibody-positive systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) while receiving standard of care (SOC) treatment. The study will be performed in adult subjects aged 18 to 70 years of age.
- Conditions
- Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- Being tested
- Anifrolumab, Placebo
- Keywords
- Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AnifrolumabBiological
Anifrolumab IV administration every 4 weeks from Week 0 to Week 48 for a total of 13 doses
PlaceboDrug
Placebo IV administration every 4 weeks from Week 0 to Week 48
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Anifrolumab - higher dose | Experimental | Anifrolumab Receives: Biological: Anifrolumab |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Placebo Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| Anifrolumab - lower dose | Experimental | Anifrolumab Receives: Biological: Anifrolumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index ≥4 (SRI[4]) at Week 52 (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)
SRI(4) was defined as meeting all of the following criteria:
Reduction from baseline of ≥4 points in the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) No new organ systems affected, defined by 1 or more British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG-2004) A or 2 or more BILAG-2004 B items No worsening from baseline in participants lupus disease activity. Worsening was defined as an increase of ≥0.30 points on a 3-point Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) visual analogue scale (VAS) No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the pre-specified analysis threshold.
Measured: Week 52
Secondary outcomes (15)
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index of ≥4 at Week 52 in the Interferon (IFN) Test-High Sub-Group (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)
SRI(4) was defined as meeting all of the following criteria:
Reduction from baseline of ≥4 points in the SLEDAI-2K No new organ systems affected, defined by 1 or more BILAG-2004 A or 2 or more BILAG-2004 B No worsening from baseline in participants lupus disease activity. Worsening was defined as an increase of ≥0.30 points on a 3-point PGA VAS No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the pre-specified analysis threshold.
Measured: Week 52
Number of Participants Who Achieved and Maintained an Oral Corticosteroid (OCS) Dose of ≤7.5 mg/Day in the Sub-group of Participants With Baseline OCS ≥10 mg/Day (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)
Maintained OCS reduction was defined by meeting all the following criteria:
Achieve an OCS dose of ≤7.5 mg/day prednisone or equivalent by Week 40 Maintain an OCS dose ≤7.5 mg/day prednisone or equivalent from Week 40 to Week 52 No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the pre-specified analysis threshold.
Measured: Week 52
Number of Participants With a ≥50% Reduction in CLASI Activity Score at Week 12 in the Sub-group of Participants With Baseline CLASI Activity Score ≥10 (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)
50% reduction in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) activity score compared to baseline was defined by meeting all of the following criteria:
Achieve ≥50% reduction of CLASI activity score at Week 12 compared to baseline No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the pre-specified analysis threshold before assessment.
Measured: Week 12
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index of ≥4 (SRI[4]) at Week 24 (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)
SRI(4) was defined as meeting all of the following criteria:
Reduction from baseline of ≥4 points in the SLEDAI-2K No new organ systems affected as defined by 1 or more BILAG-2004 A or 2 or more BILAG-2004 B items No worsening from baseline in participants lupus disease activity. Worsening was defined as an increase of ≥0.30 points on a 3-point PGA VAS No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the pre-specified threshold.
Measured: Week 24
Annualized Flare Rate
A flare was defined as either 1 or more new British Isle Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG-2004) A or 2 or more new BILAG-2004 B items compared to the previous visit. The occurrence of a new flare was checked for each available visit versus the previous available visit up to Week 52. If no new flares occurred, the number of flares was set to 0. Otherwise all flares were counted leading to the maximum number of flares of 13. The annualized flare rate was calculated as the number of flares divided by the flare exposure time in days multiplied with 365.25 (1 year). The flare exposure time is the time up to Week 52 (date of BILAG-2004 assessment at Week 52) or up to the date of last available BILAG-2004 assessment.
Measured: Baseline to Week 52
Number of Participants Who Met the Criteria for British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)
A BICLA responder was achieved if all of the following criteria was met:
All criteria related to SRI(4) (please see primary endpoint) plus:
Reduction of all baseline BILAG-2004 A to B/C/D and baseline BILAG-2004 B to C/D, and no BILAG-2004 worsening in other organ systems, as defined by 1 or more BILAG-2004 A or 1 or more new BILAG-2004 B item No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the revised post-hoc analysis threshold before assessment.
Measured: Week 52
Number of Participants Reporting One or More Adverse Events (AE)
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. AEs were collected throughout the duration of the study, from baseline until end of follow-up (a maximum of 12 weeks post last dose [Week 48]), or until Week 52 for participants who enrolled onto the long term extension (LTE). The reported value is inclusive of serious and non-serious AEs.
Measured: Baseline to End of Trial (Maximum of 60 weeks)
Number of Participants Reporting One or More Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)
An AESI is an AE of scientific and medical concern specific to understanding biologics and requires close monitoring and rapid communication by the Investigator to the Sponsor/Sponsor's delegate. An AESI may be serious or nonserious. The events of interest are serious infections, including non opportunistic serious infections, opportunistic infections, anaphylaxis, malignancy, herpes zoster, TB (including latent TB), influenza, vasculitis (non-SLE), and MACE (including stroke, MI, or cardiovascular death).
AEs were collected throughout the duration of the study, from baseline until end of follow-up (a maximum of 12 weeks post last dose [Week 48]), or until Week 52 for participants who enrolled onto the long term extension (LTE).
Measured: Baseline to End of Trial (Maximum of 60 weeks)
Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Vital Signs
Vital signs included oral temperature, blood pressure (BP), pulse rate, and respiratory rate.
Vital signs were collected throughout the duration of the study, from baseline until end of follow-up (a maximum of 12 weeks post last dose [Week 48]), or until Week 52 for participants who enrolled onto the long term extension (LTE).
Measured: Baseline to End of Trial (Maximum of 60 weeks)
Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Physical Examinations
Physical examinations included height and weight. Participants were weighed at each study visit and any medically significant changes were reported.
Physical examination values were collected throughout the duration of the study, from baseline until end of follow-up (a maximum of 12 weeks post last dose [Week 48]), or until Week 52 for participants who enrolled onto the long term extension (LTE).
Measured: Baseline to End of Trial (Maximum of 60 weeks)
Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Scores
ECGs documented the date, time, heart rate, QRS duration, PR interval, RR interval, QT, and corrected QT interval, which were calculated using the Fridericia formula. The investigator judged the overall interpretation as normal or abnormal, and if abnormal it was decided as to whether or not the abnormality was clinically significant or not clinically significant.
Measured: Baseline to Week 52
Number of Participants With Mild To Moderate Lupus Flare Evaluated by Modified Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment (SELENA)-SLEDAI Flare Index
The modified SELENA flare index was completed by the Investigator or delegated/qualified physician. Assessment of flares were scored in comparison to the participant's previous visit and should only include findings which, in the opinion of the Investigator, are due to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity within that timeframe. Flare was defined as any 1 criterion present in either the Mild/Moderate Flare or Severe Flare categories.
Number of flares were collected throughout the duration of the study, from baseline until end of follow-up (a maximum of 12 weeks post last dose [Week 48]), or until Week 52 for participants who enrolled onto the long term extension (LTE).
Measured: Baseline to End of Trial (Maximum of 60 weeks)
Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Tests
Laboratory tests were collected at central clinical laboratories and included hematology, serum chemistry and urinalysis tests. Laboratory values were collected throughout the duration of the study, from baseline until end of follow-up (a maximum of 12 weeks post last dose [Week 48]), or until Week 52 for participants who enrolled onto the long term extension (LTE).
Measured: Baseline to End of Trial (Maximum of 60 weeks)
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behaviour Assessed Via the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
The C-SSRS is an assessment tool that evaluates suicidal ideation and behavior. Number of participants with suicidal ideation or behavior was defined as the number of participants who answered "yes" at any time during the treatment period (Baseline to Week 52) to one of the 10 categories:
Category 1: Wish to be dead Category 2: Non-specific active suicidal thoughts Category 3: Active suicidal ideation with any methods (not plan) without intent to act Category 4: Active suicidal ideation with some intent to act, without specific plan Category 5: Active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent Category 6: Preparatory acts or behavior Category 7: Aborted attempt Category 8: Interrupted attempt Category 9: Actual attempt (non-fatal) Category 10: Completed suicide
Measured: Baseline to Week 52
Change From Baseline in Personal Health Questionnaire Depression Scale-8 (PHQ-8) Score
PHQ-8 is a 8-item self-report scale, all items are rated on a score of 0-3, for a total range of 0-24. PHQ-8 assesses symptoms of depression over the previous 2 weeks. Higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in symptoms.
Measured: Baseline to Week 52
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 May 2015 (estimated)
- Study start9 Jun 2015
- Primary completion17 Jul 2018
- Study completion17 Jul 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Active Systemic Lupus ErythematosusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by AstraZenecaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 460 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- AstraZeneca
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- PRA Health Sciences
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Herbert Hutman, MD, Study director, Medical Science Director
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02446912
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- D3461C00005
- Status last verified
- Dec 2022
- First submitted
- 14 May 2015
- Last updated
- 12 Jan 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Brunner HI, Cody EM, Devarajan P, Huang B, Chen C, Sinibaldi D, Ramaswamy M, Knagenhjelm J, Jones F, Brohawn PZ, Tummala R, Lindholm C, White WI. The Renal Activity Index for Lupus Identifies Active Renal Disease and Treatment Response in Adult Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Lupus Nephritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2026 Jun;78(6):723-732. doi: 10.1002/acr.25684. Epub 2026 Feb 23.
PubMed 41144892Furie RA, Morand EF, Bruce IN, Manzi S, Kalunian KC, Vital EM, Lawrence Ford T, Gupta R, Hiepe F, Santiago M, Brohawn PZ, Berglind A, Tummala R; TULIP-1 study investigators. Type I interferon inhibitor anifrolumab in active systemic lupus erythematosus (TULIP-1): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Rheumatol. 2019 Dec;1(4):e208-e219. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(19)30076-1. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
PubMed 38229377Morand EF, Abreu G, Furie RA, Golder V, Tummala R. Lupus low disease activity state attainment in the phase 3 TULIP trials of anifrolumab in active systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023 May;82(5):639-645. doi: 10.1136/ard-2022-222748. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
PubMed 36690388Bruce IN, van Vollenhoven RF, Morand EF, Furie RA, Manzi S, White WB, Abreu G, Tummala R. Sustained glucocorticoid tapering in the phase 3 trials of anifrolumab: a post hoc analysis of the TULIP-1 and TULIP-2 trials. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023 Apr 3;62(4):1526-1534. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac491.
PubMed 36018235Bruce IN, Furie RA, Morand EF, Manzi S, Tanaka Y, Kalunian KC, Merrill JT, Puzio P, Maho E, Kleoudis C, Albulescu M, Hultquist M, Tummala R. Concordance and discordance in SLE clinical trial outcome measures: analysis of three anifrolumab phase 2/3 trials. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022 Jul;81(7):962-969. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-221847. Epub 2022 May 17.
PubMed 35580976Vital EM, Merrill JT, Morand EF, Furie RA, Bruce IN, Tanaka Y, Manzi S, Kalunian KC, Kalyani RN, Streicher K, Abreu G, Tummala R. Anifrolumab efficacy and safety by type I interferon gene signature and clinical subgroups in patients with SLE: post hoc analysis of pooled data from two phase III trials. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022 Jul;81(7):951-961. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-221425. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
PubMed 35338035Loncharich MF, Anderson CW. Interferon Inhibition for Lupus with Anifrolumab: Critical Appraisal of the Evidence Leading to FDA Approval. ACR Open Rheumatol. 2022 Jun;4(6):486-491. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11414. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
PubMed 35157371Chia YL, Zhang J, Tummala R, Rouse T, Furie RA, Morand EF. Relationship of anifrolumab pharmacokinetics with efficacy and safety in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 May 5;61(5):1900-1910. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab704.
PubMed 34528084Furie R, Morand EF, Askanase AD, Vital EM, Merrill JT, Kalyani RN, Abreu G, Pineda L, Tummala R. Anifrolumab reduces flare rates in patients with moderate to severe systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2021 Jul;30(8):1254-1263. doi: 10.1177/09612033211014267. Epub 2021 May 12.
PubMed 33977796Furie R, Morand EF, Bruce IN, Isenberg D, van Vollenhoven R, Abreu G, Pineda L, Tummala R. What Does It Mean to Be a British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-Based Composite Lupus Assessment Responder? Post Hoc Analysis of Two Phase III Trials. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021 Nov;73(11):2059-2068. doi: 10.1002/art.41778. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
PubMed 33913260Hannon CW, McCourt C, Lima HC, Chen S, Bennett C. Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 9;3(3):CD007478. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007478.pub2.
PubMed 33687069
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Jan 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicentre, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Two Doses of Anifrolumab in Adult Subjects With Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02446912
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- D3461C00005
- Conditions
- Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- Keywords
- Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 460 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AstraZenecaIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- PRA Health Sciences
- Study start
- 9 Jun 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 17 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 17 Jul 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 May 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 5 Dec 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an intravenous treatment regimen of two doses of anifrolumab versus placebo in adult subjects with moderately to severely active, autoantibody-positive systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
Detailed description
This is a Phase 3, multicentre, multinational, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an intravenous treatment regimen of two doses of anifrolumab versus placebo in subjects with moderately to severely active, autoantibody-positive systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) while receiving standard of care (SOC) treatment. The study will be performed in adult subjects aged 18 to 70 years of age.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Anifrolumab - higher dose | Experimental | Biological: AnifrolumabAnifrolumab |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboPlacebo |
| Anifrolumab - lower dose | Experimental | Biological: AnifrolumabAnifrolumab |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Aged 18 through 70 years at the time of screening
- Diagnosis of paediatric or adult SLE with a diagnosis of SLE according to the ACR 1982 revised criteria ≥24 weeks prior to signing the Informed Consent form (ICF)
- Currently receiving at least 1 of the following:
- Fulfils at least 4 of the 11 ACR modified 1982 classification criteria for SLE, at least 1 of which must be:
- At Screening, Disease Activity Adjudication Group confirmation of:
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Receipt of any investigational product (small molecule or biologic agent) within 4 weeks or 5 half-lives prior to signing of the ICF, whichever is greater
- Receipt of any of the following:
- History of, or current diagnosis of, a clinically significant non SLE-related vasculitis syndrome.
- Active severe or unstable neuropsychiatric SLE
- Active severe SLE-driven renal disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AnifrolumabAnifrolumab IV administration every 4 weeks from Week 0 to Week 48 for a total of 13 doses | Biological | Anifrolumab - higher dose, Anifrolumab - lower dose |
| PlaceboPlacebo IV administration every 4 weeks from Week 0 to Week 48 | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index ≥4 (SRI[4]) at Week 52 (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)
Time frame: Week 52
SRI(4) was defined as meeting all of the following criteria: Reduction from baseline of ≥4 points in the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) No new organ systems affected, defined by 1 or more British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG-2004) A or 2 or more BILAG-2004 B items No worsening from baseline in participants lupus disease activity. Worsening was defined as an increase of ≥0.30 points on a 3-point Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) visual analogue scale (VAS) No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the pre-specified analysis threshold.
15 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index of ≥4 at Week 52 in the Interferon (IFN) Test-High Sub-Group (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)
Time frame: Week 52
Number of Participants Who Achieved and Maintained an Oral Corticosteroid (OCS) Dose of ≤7.5 mg/Day in the Sub-group of Participants With Baseline OCS ≥10 mg/Day (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)
Time frame: Week 52
Number of Participants With a ≥50% Reduction in CLASI Activity Score at Week 12 in the Sub-group of Participants With Baseline CLASI Activity Score ≥10 (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)
Time frame: Week 12
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index of ≥4 (SRI[4]) at Week 24 (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)
Time frame: Week 24
Annualized Flare Rate
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Number of Participants Who Met the Criteria for British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules)
Time frame: Week 52
Number of Participants Reporting One or More Adverse Events (AE)
Time frame: Baseline to End of Trial (Maximum of 60 weeks)
Number of Participants Reporting One or More Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)
Time frame: Baseline to End of Trial (Maximum of 60 weeks)
Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Vital Signs
Time frame: Baseline to End of Trial (Maximum of 60 weeks)
Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Physical Examinations
Time frame: Baseline to End of Trial (Maximum of 60 weeks)
Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Scores
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Number of Participants With Mild To Moderate Lupus Flare Evaluated by Modified Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment (SELENA)-SLEDAI Flare Index
Time frame: Baseline to End of Trial (Maximum of 60 weeks)
Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Tests
Time frame: Baseline to End of Trial (Maximum of 60 weeks)
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behaviour Assessed Via the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Change From Baseline in Personal Health Questionnaire Depression Scale-8 (PHQ-8) Score
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Jan 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41144892Brunner HI, Cody EM, Devarajan P, Huang B, Chen C, Sinibaldi D, Ramaswamy M, Knagenhjelm J, Jones F, Brohawn PZ, Tummala R, Lindholm C, White WI. The Renal Activity Index for Lupus Identifies Active Renal Disease and Treatment Response in Adult Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Lupus Nephritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2026 Jun;78(6):723-732. doi: 10.1002/acr.25684. Epub 2026 Feb 23.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38229377Furie RA, Morand EF, Bruce IN, Manzi S, Kalunian KC, Vital EM, Lawrence Ford T, Gupta R, Hiepe F, Santiago M, Brohawn PZ, Berglind A, Tummala R; TULIP-1 study investigators. Type I interferon inhibitor anifrolumab in active systemic lupus erythematosus (TULIP-1): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Rheumatol. 2019 Dec;1(4):e208-e219. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(19)30076-1. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36690388Morand EF, Abreu G, Furie RA, Golder V, Tummala R. Lupus low disease activity state attainment in the phase 3 TULIP trials of anifrolumab in active systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023 May;82(5):639-645. doi: 10.1136/ard-2022-222748. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36018235Bruce IN, van Vollenhoven RF, Morand EF, Furie RA, Manzi S, White WB, Abreu G, Tummala R. Sustained glucocorticoid tapering in the phase 3 trials of anifrolumab: a post hoc analysis of the TULIP-1 and TULIP-2 trials. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023 Apr 3;62(4):1526-1534. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac491.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35580976Bruce IN, Furie RA, Morand EF, Manzi S, Tanaka Y, Kalunian KC, Merrill JT, Puzio P, Maho E, Kleoudis C, Albulescu M, Hultquist M, Tummala R. Concordance and discordance in SLE clinical trial outcome measures: analysis of three anifrolumab phase 2/3 trials. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022 Jul;81(7):962-969. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-221847. Epub 2022 May 17.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35338035Vital EM, Merrill JT, Morand EF, Furie RA, Bruce IN, Tanaka Y, Manzi S, Kalunian KC, Kalyani RN, Streicher K, Abreu G, Tummala R. Anifrolumab efficacy and safety by type I interferon gene signature and clinical subgroups in patients with SLE: post hoc analysis of pooled data from two phase III trials. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022 Jul;81(7):951-961. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-221425. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35157371Loncharich MF, Anderson CW. Interferon Inhibition for Lupus with Anifrolumab: Critical Appraisal of the Evidence Leading to FDA Approval. ACR Open Rheumatol. 2022 Jun;4(6):486-491. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11414. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34528084Chia YL, Zhang J, Tummala R, Rouse T, Furie RA, Morand EF. Relationship of anifrolumab pharmacokinetics with efficacy and safety in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 May 5;61(5):1900-1910. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab704.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33977796Furie R, Morand EF, Askanase AD, Vital EM, Merrill JT, Kalyani RN, Abreu G, Pineda L, Tummala R. Anifrolumab reduces flare rates in patients with moderate to severe systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2021 Jul;30(8):1254-1263. doi: 10.1177/09612033211014267. Epub 2021 May 12.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33913260Furie R, Morand EF, Bruce IN, Isenberg D, van Vollenhoven R, Abreu G, Pineda L, Tummala R. What Does It Mean to Be a British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-Based Composite Lupus Assessment Responder? Post Hoc Analysis of Two Phase III Trials. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021 Nov;73(11):2059-2068. doi: 10.1002/art.41778. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33687069Hannon CW, McCourt C, Lima HC, Chen S, Bennett C. Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 9;3(3):CD007478. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007478.pub2.
- CSP redacted.Link provided by the sponsor.
- SAP redacted.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingPhase 4
Dapagliflozin in Active Lupus Nephritis
Lupus Nephritis (LN)
RecruitingPhase 1
To Evaluate the Effects of Cevostamab in Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus With or Without Active Lupus Nephritis
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Enpatoran in Participants With Cutaneous Manifestations of Lupus With or Without Systemic Disease
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus (CLE)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Enpatoran in Participants With Cutaneous Manifestations of Lupus With or Without Systemic Disease (ELOWEN-2)
Systematic Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Obinutuzumab in Adolescents With Active Class III or IV Lupus Nephritis and the Safety and PK of Obinutuzumab in Pediatric Participants
Lupus Nephritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Herbert Hutman, MD study director
Medical Science Director
145 sites in 18 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Anifrolumab in people with Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, run by AstraZeneca at 145 sites in 18 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 18 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jan 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 145 sites in United States, Poland, Ukraine, Peru, Romania and 13 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Dec 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index ≥4 (SRI[4]) at Week 52 (Original Analysis With Restricted Medication Rules) (time frame: Week 52). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02446912, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jan 2023.