AzTrials
AzTrials

Urinary IncontinenceNCT02446808

Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring During Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy

A study testing Intraoperative nerve monitoring in people with Urinary Incontinence and Erectile Dysfunction, run by ProPep Surgical, LLC at 1 site in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of intraoperative nerve monitoring during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy surgery improves post-surgery urinary continence and erectile function. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 70 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Urinary Incontinence, Erectile Dysfunction
What is being tested?
Intraoperative nerve monitoring
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jun 2015to Dec 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 70 years
  • Men only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male subjects 40-70 years of age diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the prostate;
  • Subjects scheduled for robotic assisted radical prostatectomy for removal of localized prostate cancer;
  • Subjects, who, in the opinion of the clinical Investigator, are able to understand this clinical investigation, cooperate with the investigational procedures and are willing to return for all the required post-treatment follow-up visits

Who cannot join

  • Subjects with pre-operative urinary incontinence defined as use of pads or adult diapers;
  • Subjects with previous pelvic or abdominal radiation therapy;
  • Subjects with current or previous malignancy other than prostate or non-melanoma skin cancer;
  • Subjects who have previously had a transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) or cryotherapy;
  • Subjects with a prostate volume of >80mL
  • Subjects with a body mass index (BMI) of ≥ 34;
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Subjects with current or suspected urinary tract or bladder infection(s);
  • Subjects with reported unstable cardiovascular disease (e.g., unstable angina, myocardial infarction within past 6 months, cardiac failure or life-threatening arrhythmia, congestive heart failure) or symptomatic postural hypotension within 6 months before screening;
  • Subjects with a history of diabetes;
  • Subjects with drug, alcohol, or substance abuse reported within the last three years (subject reported);
  • Subjects with a life expectancy less than study duration;
  • Subjects with systemic autoimmune disorder;
  • Subjects with any significant psychological disturbance that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could impair the consent process or ability to complete self-assessment questionnaires.
  • Subjects with known sensitivity to any device or products required for the RALP surgery; and
  • Subjects with any other condition that would contraindicate participation, as determined by the Investigator.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Indiana University School of Medicine

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Clinical Assessment of Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring During Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of intraoperative nerve monitoring during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy surgery improves post-surgery urinary continence and erectile function.

Read the detailed description

Study Design:

This is a single surgeon, single institution prospective post-market study of patients undergoing a robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) with intraoperative nerve monitoring of pelvic nerves using the ProPep Nerve Monitoring System. The treatment group will consist of 80 subjects (with 69 anticipated to be evaluable) undergoing RALP with intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM). This will be compared to a consecutive group of contemporary control cohort patients who have underwent RALP without nerve monitoring by the same single surgeon.

Baseline Evaluations and Data Collection:

Pre-operative baseline evaluations and data collection will be used to determine eligibility for enrollment and to document subject clinical status prior to surgical procedure. This information is recorded on the Screening case report forms (CRF).

The following data will be collected at screening/baseline:

  • Medical History including Gleason score at biopsy, and clinical stage (cT, TNM 2002);
  • Physical examination;
  • Demographic information;
  • Current symptoms;
  • Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice (EPIC-CP) Questionnaire;
  • SHIM Questionnaire;
  • Use of any drugs for erectile dysfunction ;
  • Confirmation of inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Surgical Procedure The surgical procedure should be completed according to site-specific standards. The following is a general overview of the surgical procedure for this study. The daVinci Surgical System must be used. Additional instrumentation necessary to perform the procedure is determined by the surgeon.

The Pep Electrode Introducer facilitates the introduction of the needle electrodes into the pelvis. The electrodes are initially placed in the levator muscle near the apex of the prostate in the area of the nerve bundles prior to the pedicle dissection to identify the perineal branches of the pudendal nerve. Prior to posterior dissection of the apex of the prostate, the needle electrodes are removed from the levator muscle and moved to the external urethral sphincter to identify the deep (muscular) branch of the perineal nerves. Action potentials are measured by the Pep Monitor.

Signals are induced in the nerve(s) of interest by stimulating the tissue surrounding the nerve(s) along the presumed nerve pathway with a low level electrical current. The low level current is delivered through the conventional bipolar instrument used during robotic surgery and when delivered close to a nerve it triggers and action potential in the nerve that is displayed on the Pep Monitor. The Pep Control Switch is used to switch the bipolar instrument between cautery mode and stimulation mode. The closer the bipolar instrument is to the nerve being located, the larger the amplitude of the action potential displayed by the Pep Monitor.

Nerves will be identified with the device prior to pedicle and apical dissection to establish nerve location. Nerve monitoring may be used through the course of dissections to confirm nerve location. Post-dissection readings will be collected after specimen removal to confirm the integrity of the preserved nerve tissue at the end of the case.

During the procedure and through hospital discharge the following data points will be collected:

  • Type of nerve sparing - none, partial, and bilateral;
  • Prostate size;
  • Estimated blood loss and transfusion(s);
  • Method of dissection (transperitoneal anterior, posterior, extraperitoneal, or lymph node dissection);
  • Gleason score at radical prostatectomy;
  • Pathological stage (nT);
  • Positive surgical margin rate (PSM);
  • Total robotic and surgical time;
  • Total time for device deployment;
  • Hospital admission / discharge dates; and
  • Adverse events.

Postoperative care will be according to the site-specific standard of care.

Follow-up Evaluation and Data Collections:

Subjects will be followed post-operatively at catheter removal (typically 1 week), 1 month (±2 weeks), 3 months (±3 weeks), 6 months (±1 month), and 12 months (±1 month) following the procedure. Data will be collected on the appropriate follow-up Case Report Forms (CRFs). The CRFs for each of the follow-up data collection points will be supplied to the subjects upon their discharge from the hospital following their procedure. Research assistant will call subjects the week prior to the due date to remind subjects to fill in and mail back (via pre-addressed, stamped envelopes supplied with CRFs) appropriate CRF. Site specific standard of care will be followed post-operatively.

The following data and testing will be completed at each follow-up visit:

  • Current symptoms;
  • Modified EPIC-CP Questionnaire (question 3 and 4);
  • SHIM Questionnaire;
  • Use of any drugs for erectile dysfunction; and
  • Adverse events (AE).

Contemporary Control Cohort:

As the procedures for the prospective cohort are standard of care at the investigators institution, the investigator will have all of the same measures for the contemporary control cohort that he has for the for the prospective cohort. Each prospective subject will be matched to two selected subjects in the contemporary control cohort by biopsy Gleason score (6 vs. 7 vs. 8-10), nerve-sparing status (yes/no), type of nerve sparing (unilateral or bilateral) and age (within 5 years). The contemporary control cohort will draw from consecutive patients who have undergone RALP in the previous two years (2012-2014) that did not have IONM. The investigator will not record AEs for this contemporary control cohort as the investigator is only interested in collecting AEs data potentially related to the use of the IONM.

Being tested
Intraoperative nerve monitoring
Medical subject headings
Urinary Incontinence, Erectile Dysfunction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Intraoperative nerve monitoringDevice

    Intraoperative nerve monitoring (electromyography) is used to identify the location of somatic pelvic nerves critical to urinary continence control and erectile function in real time during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy surgery

Study groups in NCT02446808
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intraoperative nerve monitoringExperimentalPatients for which intraoperative nerve monitoring (electromyography) is used to identify the location of somatic pelvic nerves critical to urinary continence control and erectile function in real time during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy surgery
Receives: Device: Intraoperative nerve monitoring

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Return of urinary continence following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy

    The proportion of subjects who have urinary continence following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) at 6 months postoperatively.

    Measured: 6 month

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Return of erectile function following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy

    The proportion of subjects who return to pre-operative baseline (RTB) category (i.e. normal, mild, moderate, or severe erectile dysfunction) of erectile function following RALP with IONM of pelvic nerves. The change in SHIM score over time from baseline to 12 months.

    Measured: catheter removal which typically occurs at 1 week, 1 month, 3 month, 6 month, 12 month

  2. Time to urinary continence

    Assess time to continence defined as using 0 pads per day following RALP with IONM of pelvic nerves for 12 month post-operatively.

    Measured: catheter removal which typically occurs at 1 week, 1 month, 3 month, 6 month, 12 month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 May 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2015
  3. Primary completionJun 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2018 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
80 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02446808
Sponsor's protocol ID
ProPep B-016-001
Status last verified
Apr 2018
First submitted
11 May 2015
Last updated
10 Apr 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Intraoperative nerve monitoring in people with Urinary Incontinence and Erectile Dysfunction, run by ProPep Surgical, LLC at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Apr 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Return of urinary continence following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (time frame: 6 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Apr 2018; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in