AzTrials
AzTrials

Low Back PainNCT02444702

Clinical, Morphological and Functional Success Predictors Following Lumbar Spinal Surgery in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain and Degenerative Disorders.

An observational study of Low Back Pain, run by Meir Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The long term goal of this project is dual fold. First, the investigators wish to derive, validate and then test the impact of a clinical prediction rule to determine which patients who suffer from CLBP with degenerative changes of the lumbar spine and referred pain to the legs are likely to require surgery and have… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Low Back Pain
How many people
200 participants
Where
1 siteIsrael
Study dates
15 Jun 2015to Dec 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Participants with CLBP (>12 weeks) and degenerative changes of the lumbar spine confirmed by CT imaging who were recommended surgery and chose to undergo surgery will be recruited from the department of Orthopedic Surgery at the Meir Medical Center, Kfar-Saba, and in Assuta hospital, Tel Aviv, Israel. Included participants will be men or women, aged 40-80 years, of any race or ethnic background. Participants' diagnosis may include unstable degenerative spondylolisthesis, radicular pain, or documented stenosis with referred pain

Who may be able to join

  • Participants' diagnosis may include unstable degenerative spondylolisthesis, radicular pain, or documented stenosis with referred pain

Who cannot join

  • Psychiatric illness
  • Previous spine surgery
  • Painful arthritic hip
  • Hospitalization or surgery in the previous 6 months
  • Alcohol consumption > 10 drinks/week
  • Diabetes or other causes for poly neuropathy
  • Metabolic bone disease, tumor, spinal deformity or contraindications to MRI

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Shay Shabat, Prof. contact

972-9-7471153

Shay.Shabat@clalit.org.il

Avihai Soroka, MscPT contact

972-522982802

yossefm@post.tau.ac.il

Israel1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Assuta hospital

    Tel Aviv

    Eli Ashkenazy, Dr., 972-0546666008, ashkenazy@isc.co.il

    Avihai Soroka, MscPT, 972-522982802, avihaisoroka@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Israel

About this study

The long term goal of this project is dual fold. First, the investigators wish to derive, validate and then test the impact of a clinical prediction rule to determine which patients who suffer from CLBP with degenerative changes of the lumbar spine and referred pain to the legs are likely to require surgery and have successful outcomes in the long term. Second, the investigators would like to establish robust methodology and statistical analysis guidelines for creating clinical prediction rules in physical therapy research. This observational cohort project is a first step towards those goals. Here the investigators specifically aim to identify personal, behavioral, psychological, morphological, and physical factors that can predict the need for surgery as well as level of participation restriction in patients who suffer from CLBP with degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine and referred pain to the legs. The investigators will also explore which parameters can predict success after 1 month, 6 and 12 months in patients who underwent decompression/fusion surgery.

Read the detailed description

A classification-based approach to identify specific characteristics of patients who seriously suffer from chronic low back pain (CLBP) with referred pain to the legs who are likely to respond to certain interventions has become a research priority in the medical milieu in general and in physical therapy in particularly.While several classifications have been developed to predict success following physical therapy interventions, some have methodological flaws and no clinical prediction rules have been created for patients with CLBP with degenerative changes of the lumbar spine and referred pain to the legs who are likely to require surgery and have successful outcome post-surgery. CLBP is multifactorial and morphological findings such as degenerative changes of the lumbar spine may not explain the phenomenon in full. The international classification of functioning, disability and health allows for a comprehensive description of the patient as a whole and can be used to classify patients according to their anatomy, pathology, impairments and capacity One-hundred and fifty patients who suffer from CLBP with degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine and referred pain to the legs and are candidates for lumbar decompression/fusion surgery will be recruited from a physician office at the Meir medical center, department of orthopaedic surgery, "Kfar-Saba", Israel. The structure and pathology of their lumbar spine will be analyzed in detail from CT and MRI imaging (morphological measurements of their vertebra and the intervertebral discs). Another one-hundred and fifty CT and MRI imaging of non symptomatic low back group will be taken from the "Meir medical center" in order to characterize the symptomatic group and their degenerative changes.

Conditions
Low Back Pain
Keywords
spinal stenosis, clinical predictors rules, MRI, fusion, low back pain
Medical subject headings
Low Back Pain, Spinal Stenosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02444702
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CLBP and degenerative lumbar spineParticipants with CLBP (>12 weeks) and degenerative changes of the lumbar spine confirmed by CT imaging who were recommended surgery and chose to undergo surgery will be recruited from the department of Orthopedic Surgery at the Meir Medical Center, Kfar-Saba, Israel. Included participants will be men or women, aged 40-80 years, of any race or ethnic background. Participants' diagnosis may include unstable degenerative spondylolisthesis, radicular pain, or documented stenosis with referred pain.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score which is equal to or greater than 50% has been used consistently in Physical Therapy literature as the definition of success following an intervention

    Measured: 6 weeks pre-op, 1 month post op, 6 months post op and 1 year post op

  2. The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMQ)

    Commonly used in CLBP research as measures of patients' participation restrictions

    Measured: up to 1 year

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. The Fear Avoidance Beliefs questionnaire (FABQ)

    The FABQ was found to be an important prognostic factor for work-related outcomes in patients with sub-acute LBP and a component of clinical predictors rules predicting changes in ODI following physical therapy interventions for patients with LBP

    Measured: 6 weeks pre-op, 1 month post op, 6 months post op and 1 year post op

  2. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)

    The IPAQ was designed to provide a set of well-developed instruments that can be used internationally to obtain comparable estimates of physical activity

    Measured: 6 weeks pre-op, 1 month post op, 6 months post op and 1 year post op

  3. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    The VAS is one of the most commonly used pain measures in CLBP research and has been shown to be reliable in this population

    Measured: 6 weeks pre-op, 1 month post op, 6 months post op and 1 year post op

  4. Lumbar myotomes function

    Will be taken by the Hand-held dynamometry (HHD) in order to assess the lower extremity muscle force output

    Measured: 6 weeks pre-op, 6 months post op and 1 year post op

  5. The Long Distance Corridor Walk (LDCW)

    comprised of a 2 minute warm up and a 400 meter walk as fast as possible

    Measured: 6 weeks pre-op, 6 months post op and 1 year

  6. The 8 foot up and go

    The 8-foot version of the Time-up-and-go test is part of the reliable and valid senior fitness test. Performance on the test indicates on sensory, motor, strength and balance function

    Measured: 6 weeks pre-op, 6 months post op and 1 year

  7. The 30-seconds chair stand test

    for lower body strength

    Measured: 6 weeks pre-op, 6 months post op and 1 year

  8. Grip strength

    Hand grip strength was found to be associated with changes in disability and pain following aquatic therapy in patients with CLBP

    Measured: 6 weeks pre-op, 6 months post op and 1 year

  9. single leg stance test

    measures static balance

    Measured: 6 weeks pre-op, 6 months post op and 1 year

  10. The four square step test

    measures dynamic balance

    Measured: 6 weeks pre-op, 6 months post op and 1 year

  11. Passive straight leg raise (PSLR)

    Passive straight leg raise (PSLR) up to first sensation of pain will be measured with an inclinometer

    Measured: 6 weeks pre-op, 6 months post op and 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 May 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start15 Jun 2015
  3. Primary completionMay 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2018 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
200 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02444702
Sponsor's protocol ID
0006-15-MMC
Status last verified
Mar 2018
First submitted
12 May 2015
Last updated
22 Mar 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Maniadakis N, Gray A. The economic burden of back pain in the UK. Pain. 2000 Jan;84(1):95-103. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00187-6.

    PubMed 10601677
  • Dankaerts W, O'Sullivan PB, Burnett AF, Straker LM. The use of a mechanism-based classification system to evaluate and direct management of a patient with non-specific chronic low back pain and motor control impairment--a case report. Man Ther. 2007 May;12(2):181-91. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2006.05.004. Epub 2006 Jul 31. No abstract available.

    PubMed 16877024
  • Matsui H, Maeda A, Tsuji H, Naruse Y. Risk indicators of low back pain among workers in Japan. Association of familial and physical factors with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Jun 1;22(11):1242-7; discussion 1248. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199706010-00014.

    PubMed 9201863
  • Lundon K, Bolton K. Structure and function of the lumbar intervertebral disk in health, aging, and pathologic conditions. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2001 Jun;31(6):291-303; discussion 304-6. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2001.31.6.291.

    PubMed 11411624
  • Masharawi YM, Peleg S, Albert HB, Dar G, Steingberg N, Medlej B, Abbas J, Salame K, Mirovski Y, Peled N, Hershkovitz I. Facet asymmetry in normal vertebral growth: characterization and etiologic theory of scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Apr 15;33(8):898-902. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816b1f83.

    PubMed 18404110
  • Luoma K, Riihimaki H, Luukkonen R, Raininko R, Viikari-Juntura E, Lamminen A. Low back pain in relation to lumbar disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Feb 15;25(4):487-92. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200002150-00016.

    PubMed 10707396
  • Ammendolia C, Chow N. Clinical outcomes for neurogenic claudication using a multimodal program for lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2015 Mar-Apr;38(3):188-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.12.006. Epub 2015 Jan 22.

    PubMed 25620608
  • Delitto A, Erhard RE, Bowling RW. A treatment-based classification approach to low back syndrome: identifying and staging patients for conservative treatment. Phys Ther. 1995 Jun;75(6):470-85; discussion 485-9. doi: 10.1093/ptj/75.6.470.

    PubMed 7770494
  • Lubetzky-Vilnai A, Ciol M, McCoy SW. Statistical analysis of clinical prediction rules for rehabilitation interventions: current state of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Jan;95(1):188-96. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.242. Epub 2013 Sep 10.

    PubMed 24036159
  • Abbas J, Hamoud K, May H, Hay O, Medlej B, Masharawi Y, Peled N, Hershkovitz I. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar spine configuration. Eur Spine J. 2010 Nov;19(11):1865-73. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1516-5. Epub 2010 Jul 21.

    PubMed 20652366
  • Singh K, Samartzis D, Vaccaro AR, Nassr A, Andersson GB, Yoon ST, Phillips FM, Goldberg EJ, An HS. Congenital lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective, control-matched, cohort radiographic analysis. Spine J. 2005 Nov-Dec;5(6):615-22. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.05.385.

    PubMed 16291100

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Low Back Pain, run by Meir Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Shay Shabat, Prof. (972-9-7471153, Shay.Shabat@clalit.org.il), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score which is equal to or greater than 50% has been used consistently in Physical Therapy literature as the definition of success following an intervention (time frame: 6 weeks pre-op, 1 month post op, 6 months post op and 1 year post op). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02444702, which also lists 11 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Mar 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in