Severe Head InjuryE-TracNCT02442154
Early Tracheostomy Versus Standard of Care in Patients With Severe Head Injury
A study testing Tracheostomy in people with Severe Head Injury, run by Makerere University at 1 site in Uganda.
Trial summary
Severe head injury is associated with airway compromise and poor respiratory effort. In Mulago Hospital intubation is the mainstay intervention and then patients are subjected to the wait and see strategy of delayed or no tracheostomy, very few undergo early tracheostomy, and some patients are left without an… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 10 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Severe Head Injury
- What is being tested?
- Tracheostomy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 160 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUganda
- Study dates
- Jun 2015to Mar 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 10 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients above 10years
- GCS ≤ 8
Who cannot join
- Patients who undergo tracheostomies within 24hours of admission before randomization
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: EARLY TRACHEOSTOMY VERSUS STANDARD OF CARE, A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE HEAD INJURY IN MULAGO HOSPITAL
Severe head injury is associated with airway compromise and poor respiratory effort. In Mulago Hospital intubation is the mainstay intervention and then patients are subjected to the wait and see strategy of delayed or no tracheostomy, very few undergo early tracheostomy, and some patients are left without an artificial airway.Using endotracheal tubes is associated with complications which have been shown to increase intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, morbidity and mortality.
Tracheostomy has been reported to have advantages over translaryngeal intubation but the optimal timing of tracheostomy in patients with severe head injury is controversial. Studies done elsewhere have showed that patients with severe head injury who undergo early tracheostomy have better survival outcomes but no studies have been done in our setting
Read the detailed description
Introduction; Most patients with severe head injury cannot protect their airway, have excessive secretions and inadequate spontaneous breathing which contributes to cerebral hypoxia. Thus, in their initial management the airway is secured with either an endotracheal tube (ETT) or a tracheostomy. In Mulago Hospital some of these patients are intubated and then subjected to the wait and see strategy of delayed or no tracheostomy, very few undergo early tracheostomy, and some patients are left without an artificial airway. Tracheostomy has been reported to have advantages over translaryngeal intubation but the optimal timing of tracheostomy in patients with severe head injury is controversial. Studies done elsewhere have showed that patients with severe head injury who undergo early tracheostomy have better outcomes.
Problem statement; Mulago hospital receives the largest number of patients with severe head injured with a mortality rate of 69%. Securing these patients airway using ETT is associated with complications which have been shown to increase ICU and hospital stay, morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, most intubated patients often require ICU admission for care of ETT and mechanical ventilation and yet these patients require little or no assistance from mechanical ventilation if the airway has been secured with a tracheostomy. With limited number of ventilators and beds in ICU and increased demand for ICU admission in Mulago hospital, this poses a challenge.
Objective; To compare 30 day mortality of severe head injured patients undergoing early tracheostomy versus standard of care in Mulago Hospital and the associated factors
Methodology; Randomized controlled clinical trial, open label, to be carried out in Mulago Hospital Trauma Centre, casualty, ICU, and neuro-surgical ward high dependence unit (3AHDU).
All patients above 10years with severe traumatic brain injury who meet the study criteria will be recruited and randomly assigned to either arm.
The patients on the early tracheostomy arm will undergo tracheostomy, done by an Otolaryngologist (ENT surgeon) or resident within 24 hours of admission, then admitted either in trauma center, ICU if there is space available, or Neurosurgery ward HDU. Patients will then receive routine care for the severe head injured patients as per Mulago hospital standards.
On the other arm the patients will receive the standard of care as per the attending clinician, and these are also admitted either in trauma Centre, ICU or Neurosurgery ward HDU where they also receive routine care for severe head injured patients as per Mulago hospital standards.
Follow up the primary outcome is 30day mortality The patients on both arms will be followed up for a maximum of 30 days To assess for; Acute complications of the tracheostomy (bleeding, subcutaneous emphysema, pneumothorax) Number of days on the mechanical ventilator and development of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) for the mechanically ventilated patients using; increase in respiratory rate, FiO2, temperature and White blood cell count from the baseline, consistency of the tracheal aspirate and culture of the tracheal aspirate.
Number of days patient requires sedation for the sedated patients. Length of ICU and hospital stay and glasgow coma scale (GCS) at discharge.
- Conditions
- Severe Head Injury
- Being tested
- Tracheostomy
- Keywords
- early tracheostomy, severe head injury, endotracheal intubation
- Medical subject headings
- Craniocerebral Trauma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TracheostomyProcedure or surgery
It is a surgical procedure which involves making an incision on the anterior aspect of the neck and opening a direct airway through an incision in the trachea with stitching the trachea to the skin and placement of a tube
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Early tracheostomy | Experimental | To do an early tracheostomy within 24hours of admission of the severely head injured patients Receives: Procedure: Tracheostomy |
| standard of care | No intervention | To use the standard of care of mulago hospital for the management of the severely head injured patients |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
30day mortality
the number of deaths recorded within 30days of admission
Measured: within 30 days of follow up
Secondary outcomes (4)
length of ICU and hospital stay
number of days spent in the ICU and hospital
Measured: 30 days
incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia
Number of days on the mechanical ventilator and development of VAP for the mechanically ventilated patients using; increase in respiratory rate, Fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), temperature and White blood cell count from the baseline, consistency of the tracheal aspirate and culture of the tracheal aspirate
Measured: 30days
duration of sedation
number of days the patient receives sedatives
Measured: 30days
Glasgow coma scale on discharge
level of consciousness on discharge
Measured: 30days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 May 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2015
- Primary completionJan 2016
- Study completionMar 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Severe Head InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 160 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Makerere University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Arthur Kwizera, Mmed, Study director, Makerere Univervisity college of health scienceJuliet Nalwoga, MBChB, Principal investigator, Makerere University college of health science
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02442154
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2013/HD07/2134U
- Acronym
- E-Trac
- Status last verified
- Aug 2015
- First submitted
- 29 Apr 2015
- Last updated
- 18 Mar 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Mar 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- EARLY TRACHEOSTOMY VERSUS STANDARD OF CARE, A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE HEAD INJURY IN MULAGO HOSPITAL
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02442154
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- E-Trac / 2013/HD07/2134U
- Conditions
- Severe Head Injury
- Keywords
- early tracheostomy, severe head injury, endotracheal intubation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 160 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Makerere UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2015
- Primary completion
- Jan 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 May 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Severe head injury is associated with airway compromise and poor respiratory effort. In Mulago Hospital intubation is the mainstay intervention and then patients are subjected to the wait and see strategy of delayed or no tracheostomy, very few undergo early tracheostomy, and some patients are left without an artificial airway.Using endotracheal tubes is associated with complications which have been shown to increase intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, morbidity and mortality.
Tracheostomy has been reported to have advantages over translaryngeal intubation but the optimal timing of tracheostomy in patients with severe head injury is controversial. Studies done elsewhere have showed that patients with severe head injury who undergo early tracheostomy have better survival outcomes but no studies have been done in our setting
Detailed description
Introduction; Most patients with severe head injury cannot protect their airway, have excessive secretions and inadequate spontaneous breathing which contributes to cerebral hypoxia. Thus, in their initial management the airway is secured with either an endotracheal tube (ETT) or a tracheostomy. In Mulago Hospital some of these patients are intubated and then subjected to the wait and see strategy of delayed or no tracheostomy, very few undergo early tracheostomy, and some patients are left without an artificial airway. Tracheostomy has been reported to have advantages over translaryngeal intubation but the optimal timing of tracheostomy in patients with severe head injury is controversial. Studies done elsewhere have showed that patients with severe head injury who undergo early tracheostomy have better outcomes.
Problem statement; Mulago hospital receives the largest number of patients with severe head injured with a mortality rate of 69%. Securing these patients airway using ETT is associated with complications which have been shown to increase ICU and hospital stay, morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, most intubated patients often require ICU admission for care of ETT and mechanical ventilation and yet these patients require little or no assistance from mechanical ventilation if the airway has been secured with a tracheostomy. With limited number of ventilators and beds in ICU and increased demand for ICU admission in Mulago hospital, this poses a challenge.
Objective; To compare 30 day mortality of severe head injured patients undergoing early tracheostomy versus standard of care in Mulago Hospital and the associated factors
Methodology; Randomized controlled clinical trial, open label, to be carried out in Mulago Hospital Trauma Centre, casualty, ICU, and neuro-surgical ward high dependence unit (3AHDU).
All patients above 10years with severe traumatic brain injury who meet the study criteria will be recruited and randomly assigned to either arm.
The patients on the early tracheostomy arm will undergo tracheostomy, done by an Otolaryngologist (ENT surgeon) or resident within 24 hours of admission, then admitted either in trauma center, ICU if there is space available, or Neurosurgery ward HDU. Patients will then receive routine care for the severe head injured patients as per Mulago hospital standards.
On the other arm the patients will receive the standard of care as per the attending clinician, and these are also admitted either in trauma Centre, ICU or Neurosurgery ward HDU where they also receive routine care for severe head injured patients as per Mulago hospital standards.
Follow up the primary outcome is 30day mortality The patients on both arms will be followed up for a maximum of 30 days To assess for; Acute complications of the tracheostomy (bleeding, subcutaneous emphysema, pneumothorax) Number of days on the mechanical ventilator and development of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) for the mechanically ventilated patients using; increase in respiratory rate, FiO2, temperature and White blood cell count from the baseline, consistency of the tracheal aspirate and culture of the tracheal aspirate.
Number of days patient requires sedation for the sedated patients. Length of ICU and hospital stay and glasgow coma scale (GCS) at discharge.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Early tracheostomy | Experimental | Procedure: TracheostomyTo do an early tracheostomy within 24hours of admission of the severely head injured patients |
| standard of care | No intervention | –To use the standard of care of mulago hospital for the management of the severely head injured patients |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 10 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients above 10years
- GCS ≤ 8
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients who undergo tracheostomies within 24hours of admission before randomization
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TracheostomyIt is a surgical procedure which involves making an incision on the anterior aspect of the neck and opening a direct airway through an incision in the trachea with stitching the trachea to the skin and placement of a tube | Procedure or surgery | Early tracheostomy |
Primary outcome
30day mortality
Time frame: within 30 days of follow up
the number of deaths recorded within 30days of admission
4 secondary outcomes
length of ICU and hospital stay
Time frame: 30 days
incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia
Time frame: 30days
duration of sedation
Time frame: 30days
Glasgow coma scale on discharge
Time frame: 30days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Mar 2016.
Related trials for Severe Head Injury
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
Valproic AcId for Traumatic BRAin INjury Trial
Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
Recruiting
Comprehensive Assessment of Rehabilitation Experience Using the SAFE Scale
Caregiver Anxiety, Acquired Brain Injury
RecruitingObservational study
Cortical Spreading Depolarization After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
Traumatic Brain Injury
RecruitingObservational study
Predict Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
Traumatic Brain Injury
Recruiting
The Coma Family Program (COMA-F): A Resilience Program for Caregivers of Patients With Severe Acute Brain Injury
Caregiver Distress, Emotional Distress
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Arthur Kwizera, Mmed study director
Makerere Univervisity college of health science
Juliet Nalwoga, MBChB principal investigator
Makerere University college of health science
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Tracheostomy in people with Severe Head Injury, run by Makerere University at 1 site in Uganda.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Mar 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Uganda. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
30day mortality (time frame: within 30 days of follow up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Mar 2016.