AzTrials
AzTrials

Neoplasm, UreterPhase 2NCT02438865

Prophylactic Intravesical Chemotherapy After Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: a Randomized Controlled Trial Between Single Postoperative Dose Versus Maintenance Therapy.

A Phase 2 study testing Immediate instillation of intravesical chemotherapy-Epirubicin- and Maintainance therapy of intravesical chemotherapy-Epirubicin- in people with Neoplasm, Ureter and Neoplasm, Bladder, run by Mansoura University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This clinical trial is designed to compare the effect of single postoperative intravesical chemotherapy instillation versus maintenance therapy on reducing bladder cancer recurrence after surgery for UTUC. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Neoplasm, Ureter, Neoplasm, Bladder
What is being tested?
Immediate instillation of intravesical chemotherapy-Epirubicin- and Maintainance therapy of intravesical chemotherapy-Epirubicin-
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
74 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Jan 2015to 30 May 2018
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with UTUC without history of bladder tumor
  • Patients with UTUC without synchronous bladder tumor

Who cannot join

  • Patients with history of bladder tumor
  • Patients with synchronous bladder tumor
  • Patients with advanced stage (T4)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Urology and Nephrology Center

    Al Mansurah, DK, 35516

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

This clinical trial is designed to compare the effect of single postoperative intravesical chemotherapy instillation versus maintenance therapy on reducing bladder cancer recurrence after surgery for UTUC.

Read the detailed description

INTRODUCTION Upper tact urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) arises from the urothelial lining of the urinary tract from the renal calyces to the ureteral orifice. It comprises 10 % of all renal tumors and 5% of all urothelial malignancies (Jemal et al., 2007). A common feature of UTUC is multiple anatomic locations in the urinary tract either synchronous or metachronous. While synchronous bladder tumor can be identified at time of evaluation of UTUC, recurrent bladder tumor remains a major concern.

Incidence of bladder recurrence after management of UTUC varies considerably from 20% - 50% (Kirkali and Tuzel., 2003; Hall et al., 1998). Although the risk factors for development of bladder tumor post surgical management of UTUC were previously studied, considerable variations were observed in the literature. In a recent meta-analysis, Seisen et al., in 2014 have identified male gender, previous bladder cancer, and preoperative chronic kidney disease as patient-specific predictors. While tumor-specific predictors were as follows: positive preoperative urinary cytology, ureteral location, multifocality, invasive stage, and necrosis. Lastly, treatment-specific predictors were a laparoscopic approach, extravesical bladder cuff removal, and positive surgical margins.

To date, two theories have been proposed for intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy including intraluminal seeding of a single transformed cell (Habuchi et al., 1993) and pan-urothelial field defect e.g. carcinogenic exposure of the entire urothelial tract can lead to independent multifocal development (Takahashi et al., 2001; Jones et al., 2005). Therefore, it has been suggested that administration of a single dose of intravesical chemotherapy in the early postoperative period might prevent seeding of transitional cancer cells and therefore might help reduce the incidence of urothelial tumor recurrence in the first year post surgery (O'Brien et al., 2011). To the best of our knowledge, only two randomized controlled trials have investigated this hypothesis (O'Brien et al., 2011; Ito et al., 2013 ). O' Brien et al., 2011, have reported 16% of patients in the mitomycin C arm and 27% of patients in the standard treatment arm developed bladder cancer recurrence within the first year postoperative. Ito et al., 2013, reported 16.9% of patients in the pirarubicin arm and 31.8% of patients in the standard treatment arm developed bladder cancer recurrence within the first postoperative year. Based on these findings, it has been recommended in the last European association of urology guidelines that postoperative instillation of chemotherapy is recommended to avoid bladder cancer recurrence "grade B recommendation" (Roupret et al., 2013).

In 2001 Sakamoto et al., examined the significance of intravesical instillation of Mitomycin C and cytosine arabinoside over 2 years period. They showed that instillation would reduce the recurrence rate in the bladder after surgery for upper urinary tract tumors. However, this study was underpowered to detect the desired difference. The investigators hypothesized that the 16% incidence of bladder tumor recurrence after single postoperative instillation of intravesical chemotherapy after surgery for UTUC might be attributed to the influence of pan-urothelial field defect theory. Therefore, the investigators assume that maintenance intravesical chemotherapy would significantly reduce this percentage of tumor recurrence.

AIM OF THE WORK This clinical trial is designed to compare the effect of single postoperative intravesical chemotherapy instillation versus maintenance therapy on reducing bladder cancer recurrence after surgery for UTUC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients:

Type of the study A randomized controlled trial (RCT), phase II.

Study locality Urology Nephrology Center (UNC)

Study design

Patients with UTUC will be prospectively randomized into two groups using excel software by random table function:

  1. Group 1: will receive single intravesical dose of epirubicin intravesical therapy (50 mg) within 48 hours of radical nephroureterectomy with open bladder cuff excision.
  2. Group 2: will receive a single intravesical dose of epirubicin and an additional 6 weekly doses of intravesical therapy (50 mg) after surgery then monthly maintenance therapy for 1 year.

Exclusion criteria

  1. Patients with history of bladder tumor
  2. Patients with synchronous bladder tumor
  3. Patients with advanced stage (T4)

Power calculation and Statistical analysis All statistical analysis will be performed using IBM v. 20 statistical software and the statistical tests will be used appropriately whenever indicated. The calculation of sample size is conducted using G*power statistical software (Faul F et al., 2007). The recurrence rate in the control arm of the study was reported to be 16% after single intravesical dose of chemotherapy. If the expected treatment effect of maintenance chemotherapy was similar to that observed in bladder tumor, there would be a reduction in recurrence rate by 38% )Huncharek M et al., 2001). Therefore, to detect this level of difference at a power of 80% and 5% level of significance, 35 patients will be required to detect the difference between groups (1) and (2) and accounting for 15% losses in each arm, 40 patients will be randomized in each arm.

Methods:

Intervention Patients will be randomly allocated into one of the two groups using excel software by random table function at the day of surgery. Radical nephroureterectomy will be done through the open or laparoscopic approach while bladder cuff excision will be performed through the open approach. All data will be prospectively maintained and include patients' demographics, preoperative laboratory parameters, operative details and postoperative complications

Follow up The scheduled follow up will be according to the EUA guidelines (Roupret M et al., 2013) by scheduling a urine cytology and cystoscopy at 3 months then at one year while CT urography at one year for non-invasive tumors and at 6 months and one year for invasive tumors. All chemotherapy-related complications will be reported.

Outcome and end-point The primary outcome of the study is the diagnosis of intravesical recurrence within the first year after surgery. The secondary outcome is to determine the adverse events postoperative morbidity, mortality and survival of patients with UTUC.

Being tested
Immediate instillation of intravesical chemotherapy-Epirubicin-, Maintainance therapy of intravesical chemotherapy-Epirubicin-
Keywords
Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma, Intravesical Chemotherapy, Epirubicin, Urothelial Carcinoma
Medical subject headings
Ureteral Neoplasms, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Transitional Cell

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Immediate instillation of intravesical chemotherapy-Epirubicin-Drug

  • Maintainance therapy of intravesical chemotherapy-Epirubicin-Drug

Study groups in NCT02438865
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Single instillation groupActive comparatorwill receive single intravesical dose of epirubicin intravesical therapy (50 mg) within 48 hours of radical nephroureterectomy with open bladder cuff excision.
Receives: Drug: Immediate instillation of intravesical chemotherapy-Epirubicin-
Maintainance therapy groupActive comparatorwill receive a single intravesical dose of epirubicin and an additional 6 weekly doses of intravesical therapy (50 mg) after surgery then monthly maintenance therapy for 1 year.
Receives: Drug: Maintainance therapy of intravesical chemotherapy-Epirubicin-

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. bladder recurrence

    The primary outcome of the study is the diagnosis of intravesical recurrence within the first year after surgery.

    Measured: 1 year after surgery

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. adverse events

    The secondary outcome is to determine the adverse events postoperative morbidity, mortality and survival of patients with UTUC.

    Measured: 1 year after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 May 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Jan 2015
  3. Primary completion1 May 2018
  4. Study completion30 May 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
74 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02438865
Sponsor's protocol ID
MElsh112015
Status last verified
Sep 2018
First submitted
6 May 2015
Last updated
13 Sep 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Immediate instillation of intravesical chemotherapy-Epirubicin- and Maintainance therapy of intravesical chemotherapy-Epirubicin- in people with Neoplasm, Ureter and Neoplasm, Bladder, run by Mansoura University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

bladder recurrence (time frame: 1 year after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Sep 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in