Drug AddictionNCT02437123
The Cedar Project: Impact of mHealth for HIV Prevention Among Young Indigenous People Who Use Illicit Drugs
A study testing The Cedar Project mHealth intervention in people with Drug Addiction and HIV, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
This study will examine the effect of a culturally-safe two-way supportive text message intervention to reduce HIV vulnerability among young Indigenous people who use illicit drugs in a community-based setting. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 to 30 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Drug Addiction, HIV
- What is being tested?
- The Cedar Project mHealth intervention
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 180 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Sep 2014to Jun 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 to 30 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- currently enrolled in the Cedar Project
- completed main Cedar Project Baseline questionnaire and attended at least one follow-up visit since 2009
- had not tested positive for HIV
- joined study in Vancouver or Prince George
- alive at initiation of Cedar Project mHealth study
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 1Y6
About this study
This study will examine the effect of a culturally-safe two-way supportive text message intervention to reduce HIV vulnerability among young Indigenous people who use illicit drugs in a community-based setting.
The study is nested within The Cedar Project, an ongoing cohort study addressing HIV and Hepatitis C vulnerability among young Indigenous people who use drugs in Vancouver and Prince George, British Columbia, Canada. Indigenous collaborators and investigators, collectively known as the Cedar Project Partnership, govern the entire research process.
Read more
A stratified Zelen pre-randomized design will be used to identify a random selection of cohort members to be offered the Cedar Project mHealth intervention with consent. Participants in the intervention arm will receive a package of supports, including a mobile phone and long-distance plan, weekly two-way supportive text messaging via the WelTel platform, and support from Cedar Advocates. Those drawn from the cohort study population as the comparison group will continue on in the usual Cedar Project study under its existing informed consent with no change whatsoever to their participation in the overall study.
The main outcome is an HIV propensity score, assessed at six months and one year. Secondary outcomes include HIV risk, resilience, access to drug-related services, psychological distress, and connection to culture measured at six months and one year. Primary analysis is by intention to treat.
- Conditions
- Drug Addiction, HIV
- Being tested
- The Cedar Project mHealth intervention
- Keywords
- mHealth, Indigenous, HIV prevention, substance use
- Medical subject headings
- Substance-Related Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
The Cedar Project mHealth interventionBehavioural
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| The Cedar Project mHealth Intervention | Experimental | The Cedar Project mHealth intervention consists of a package of culturally-safe supports, including a mobile phone and long-distance cellular plan, weekly two-way text messaging, and support from community-based Cedar Advocates. Receives: Behavioral: The Cedar Project mHealth intervention |
| Comparison group | No intervention | The comparison group will be sampled from The Cedar Project, an ongoing cohort study of young Indigenous people who use drugs under its existing informed consent with no change whatsoever to their participation in the overall study. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
HIV propensity score
Previous analyses of Cedar Project data have identified several factors as associated with HIV infection. These will be used to build a propensity score for HIV risk. Change in this score from baseline will be used to determine the impact of the intervention on HIV vulnerability over the prior six-month period.
Measured: 0, 6 and 12 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
HIV risk
Several self-reported binary measures will be used to determine the impact of the intervention on HIV risk in the prior six month period, including: recent injection drug use, high frequency drug use, needle sharing, and participation in sex work.
Measured: 0, 6 and 12 months
Resilience
Resilience, or the ability to cope with stress in the face of adversity, will be characterized using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). The CD-RISC scale measures resilience via 25 items on a 5-point scale with scores ranging between 0-100, with higher scores indicating greater resilience.
Measured: 0, 6 and 12 months
Access to drug-related services
Self-reported access to drug-related services, including opioid substitution therapy, needle exchange, safe injection facility, and drug treatment in the previous six month period will be ascertained from the main Cedar Project questionnaire. Proportions of participants reporting access to these services will be compared in the intervention and control groups. We will also determine if there are differences among treated and control groups in terms of proportion of people who tried to quit in the previous six-month period.
Measured: 0, 6 and 12 months
Connection to culture
Connection to Indigenous culture has been hypothesized as a key protective factor for young Indigenous people who use drugs. It will be assessed using two dichotomous variables that measure cultural activity in the prior six-month period including: (1) Self-reported participation in traditional ceremonies (including: potlatch, feast, fast, burning ceremony, washing ceremony, naming ceremony, big/smoke house, rights of passage, smudge, dances, or any other traditional Indigenous ceremony); (2) frequently living by traditional culture (never/rarely vs. often/always). These variables were defined by Earl Henderson (Cree-Métis) and Violet Bozoki (Lheidli T'enneh Nation) who are Indigenous Elders, traditional knowledge keepers, and members of the Cedar Project Partnership.
Measured: 0, 6 and 12 months
Psychological distress
The Symptom Checklist-90-R (SCL-90-R) is a 90-item self-reported symptom inventory that measures the severity of nine dimensions of psychological distress in the past three months scored on a five-point Likert scale (from not at all to extremely). Participants' SCL-90-R scores will be transformed into an average Global Severity Index ranging between 0-1.5, providing a single average measure that profiles overall degree of psychological distress.
Measured: 0, 6 and 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 May 2015 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2014
- Primary completionJun 2016
- Study completionJun 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Drug AddictionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of British ColumbiaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 180 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of British Columbia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02437123
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H13-02718
- Status last verified
- Jul 2016
- First submitted
- 4 May 2015
- Last updated
- 28 Jan 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Jongbloed K, Friedman AJ, Pearce ME, Van Der Kop ML, Thomas V, Demerais L, Pooyak S, Schechter MT, Lester RT, Spittal PM; Cedar Project Partnership. The Cedar Project WelTel mHealth intervention for HIV prevention in young Indigenous people who use illicit drugs: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016 Mar 9;17(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1250-3.
PubMed 26957103
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Jan 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Cedar Project: Impact of mHealth for HIV Prevention Among Young Indigenous People Who Use Illicit Drugs
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02437123
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- H13-02718
- Conditions
- Drug Addiction, HIV
- Keywords
- mHealth, Indigenous, HIV prevention, substance use
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 180 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of British ColumbiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
- Study start
- Sep 2014
- Primary completion
- Jun 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 May 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will examine the effect of a culturally-safe two-way supportive text message intervention to reduce HIV vulnerability among young Indigenous people who use illicit drugs in a community-based setting.
The study is nested within The Cedar Project, an ongoing cohort study addressing HIV and Hepatitis C vulnerability among young Indigenous people who use drugs in Vancouver and Prince George, British Columbia, Canada. Indigenous collaborators and investigators, collectively known as the Cedar Project Partnership, govern the entire research process.
A stratified Zelen pre-randomized design will be used to identify a random selection of cohort members to be offered the Cedar Project mHealth intervention with consent. Participants in the intervention arm will receive a package of supports, including a mobile phone and long-distance plan, weekly two-way supportive text messaging via the WelTel platform, and support from Cedar Advocates. Those drawn from the cohort study population as the comparison group will continue on in the usual Cedar Project study under its existing informed consent with no change whatsoever to their participation in the overall study.
The main outcome is an HIV propensity score, assessed at six months and one year. Secondary outcomes include HIV risk, resilience, access to drug-related services, psychological distress, and connection to culture measured at six months and one year. Primary analysis is by intention to treat.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| The Cedar Project mHealth Intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: The Cedar Project mHealth interventionThe Cedar Project mHealth intervention consists of a package of culturally-safe supports, including a mobile phone and long-distance cellular plan, weekly two-way text messaging, and support from community-based Cedar Advocates. |
| Comparison group | No intervention | –The comparison group will be sampled from The Cedar Project, an ongoing cohort study of young Indigenous people who use drugs under its existing informed consent with no change whatsoever to their participation in the overall study. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 to 30 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- currently enrolled in the Cedar Project
- completed main Cedar Project Baseline questionnaire and attended at least one follow-up visit since 2009
- had not tested positive for HIV
- joined study in Vancouver or Prince George
- alive at initiation of Cedar Project mHealth study
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| The Cedar Project mHealth intervention | Behavioural | The Cedar Project mHealth Intervention |
Primary outcome
HIV propensity score
Time frame: 0, 6 and 12 months
Previous analyses of Cedar Project data have identified several factors as associated with HIV infection. These will be used to build a propensity score for HIV risk. Change in this score from baseline will be used to determine the impact of the intervention on HIV vulnerability over the prior six-month period.
5 secondary outcomes
HIV risk
Time frame: 0, 6 and 12 months
Resilience
Time frame: 0, 6 and 12 months
Access to drug-related services
Time frame: 0, 6 and 12 months
Connection to culture
Time frame: 0, 6 and 12 months
Psychological distress
Time frame: 0, 6 and 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Jan 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26957103Jongbloed K, Friedman AJ, Pearce ME, Van Der Kop ML, Thomas V, Demerais L, Pooyak S, Schechter MT, Lester RT, Spittal PM; Cedar Project Partnership. The Cedar Project WelTel mHealth intervention for HIV prevention in young Indigenous people who use illicit drugs: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016 Mar 9;17(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1250-3.
Related trials for Drug Addiction
Recruiting
The Trans-Led Care Study
Substance Abuse, Substance Addiction
Not yet recruiting
QAIAx - SGI/SI Smart Health Cities: Microcity Enclave Program (Quantum SI/AGI Agency a/k/a AI City Hall Project - UPSTO App Nos. 64/074,526, 64/063,557, 64/105,164, 63/903,181, 63/729,428, 64/125,360; USPTO EO 9424 Assignment ID: 2101042 / ARN: REEL/FRAME: 76481/0026 - OUSD-R&E, Department of War)
Asperger's Disorder, Asperger Disorder
RecruitingObservational study
Outcome Inference in the Sensory Preconditioning Task in Opioid-Use Disorder
Opioid-Related Disorders, Drug Addiction
Active, not recruiting
Evaluation of Effectiveness of the LifeSkills Training - Lombardia - Primary Shool Program ( Val3P-LST )
Well Being, Drug Addiction
Recruiting
Neuroimaging of Adolescent Cannabis Use Treatment
Cannabis Use, Cannabis Dependence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing The Cedar Project mHealth intervention in people with Drug Addiction and HIV, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
HIV propensity score (time frame: 0, 6 and 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02437123, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jan 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.