SchizophreniaPhase 3NCT02435836
A Follow-on Study of the Long-Term Safety of Aripiprazole in Patients With Chronic Schizophrenia
A Phase 3 study testing Aripiprazole in people with Schizophrenia, run by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc..
Trial summary
The primary objective of the study was to determine the safety of aripiprazole administered long-term in doses ranging from 10 to 30 mg per day as a maintenance therapy in subjects with chronic or first episode of schizophrenia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Schizophrenia
- What is being tested?
- Aripiprazole
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 631 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Apr 1998to Dec 2012
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Complete a Prior Study: each patient must meet one of the following conditions for completion of the prior study:
- A patient who has completed 52 weeks of post-randomization treatment in the prior double blind study (31-97-301 or 31-98-304-01) is eligible, with no further qualifications.
- A patient who was early-terminated from the study 31-97-301 or 31-98- 304-01 for either of the following two reasons is eligible to enter this open label study with no minimal required duration of prior double-blind participation:
- Early termination was due to a marked deterioration of clinical status and no serious adverse events (SAE) other than hospitalization has occurred. The marked clinical deterioration must be documented by at least a one-point increase in CGI-Severity score from the baseline and a score of 6 (much worse) or 7 (very much worse) in CGI-Global Improvement at the time of termination, or
- Early termination was due to a non-serious AE requiring discontinuation of the study drug
- A patient who was early terminated after a minimum of 4 weeks' participation in the double-blind treatment in study 31-97-301 or 31-98- 304-01 and the reason for early termination was withdrawal of consent due to lack of effect but not marked deterioration. This must be documented by no change from baseline in the CGI-Severity score and a score of 4 (no change) or 5 (minimally worse) on the CGI-Global Improvement scale.
- Signing of Informed Consent Form: Prior to any procedure or drug administration, each patient must sign an informed consent form. In addition, if required by the Ethical Committee, each patient's next-of-kin or responsible caregiver will co-sign the patient's consent form or a separate consent form.
Who cannot join
- Patients suffering from any significant somatic disease or medical problem that would obscure the results of treatment, or that might require frequent changes of concomitant medication.
- Patients with any acute or unstable medical condition requiring pharmacotherapy, other than schizophrenia.
- Patients with an abnormal laboratory test value in the most recent analysis (from the study 31-97-301 or 31-98-304-01) which is considered by the investigator as presenting a significant risk to the patient for continuing treatment with aripiprazole.
- Patients who were early-terminated from the prior double-blind studies (31-97-301 or 31-98-304-01) due to a serious adverse event (SAE) other than worsening of psychosis or hospitalization.
- Female patients of child bearing potential with a positive serum pregnancy test at the baseline (last visit of prior study) of this open-label follow-on study.
- Patients who have positive result in the urine screen for drugs of abuse (except for cannabis or medically-prescribed analgesics or benzodiazepines.)
About this study
Official title: An Open-Label Follow-on Study of the Long-Term Safety of Aripiprazole in Patients With Chronic Schizophrenia
The primary objective of the study was to determine the safety of aripiprazole administered long-term in doses ranging from 10 to 30 mg per day as a maintenance therapy in subjects with chronic or first episode of schizophrenia. Information on the continued efficacy of aripiprazole was also gathered in this long-term trial (until 31 Dec 2012 or until aripiprazole was otherwise available through marketed means and/or reimbursed).
- Conditions
- Schizophrenia
- Being tested
- Aripiprazole
- Medical subject headings
- Schizophrenia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AripiprazoleDrug
Also called Abilify
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Aripiprazole | Experimental | All subjects began open-label treatment with 30 mg aripiprazole on the first day of participation in the current trial. Once a subject stabilized at the 30 mg per day dose, the investigator could adjust the dose within the range of 10 to 30 mg per day as needed (throughout this long-term trial), to manage AEs. Receives: Drug: Aripiprazole |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score by Week
The PANSS consisted of three subscales: a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 (absence of symptoms) and a score of 7 (extremely severe symptoms). The PANSS total score was the sum of the rating scores for 7 positive scale items, 7 negative scale items, and 16 general psychopathology scale items from the PANSS panel. The PANSS total score ranged from 30 (best possible outcome) to 210 (worst possible outcome).
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 continuing every 12 weeks, Last Visit
Mean Change From Baseline in PANSS Positive Sub-scale Score by Week
The PANSS consisted of three subscales: a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 (absence of symptoms) and a score of 7 (extremely severe symptoms). The PANSS positive subscale score was the sum of the rating scores for the 7 positive scale items from the PANSS panel. The 7 positive symptom constructs are delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinatory behavior, excitement, grandiosity, suspiciousness/persecution, and hostility. The PANSS Positive Subscale ranges from 7 (absence of symptoms) to 49 (extremely severe symptoms).
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 continuing every 12 weeks, Last Visit
Mean Change From Baseline in PANSS Negative Sub-scale Score by Week
The PANSS consisted of three subscales: a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 (absence of symptoms) and a score of 7 (extremely severe symptoms). The PANSS negative subscale score was the sum of the rating scores for the 7 negative scale items from the PANSS panel. The 7 negative symptom constructs: blunted affect, emotional withdrawal, poor rapport, passive apathetic withdrawal, difficulty in abstract thinking, lack of spontaneity and flow of conversation, stereotyped thinking. The PANSS Negative Subscale ranges from 7 (absence of symptoms) to 49 (extremely severe symptoms).
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 continuing every 12 weeks, Last Visit
Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) by Week
The severity of illness for each participant was rated using the CGI-S scale. To assess CGI-S, the study physician answered the following question: "Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill is the participant at this time?" Response choices included: 0 = not assessed; 1 = normal, not ill at all; 2 = borderline mentally ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; and 7 = among the most extremely ill participants.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 continuing every 12 weeks, Last Visit
Mean Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) by Week
The efficacy of trial medication were rated for each participant using the CGI-I scale. The study physician must rate the participant's total improvement whether or not it is due entirely to drug treatment. All responses were compared to the participant's condition at baseline. Response choices include: 0 = not assessed; 1 =very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5
=minimally worse; 6 = much worse; and 7 = very much worse.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 continuing every 12 weeks, Last Visit
Mean Change From Baseline in Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score
The MADRS is a ten-item diagnostic questionnaire which psychiatrists use to measure the severity of depressive episodes in participants with mood disorders. The questionnaire includes questions on the following symptoms. 1. Apparent sadness 2. Reported sadness 3. Inner tension 4. Reduced sleep 5. Reduced appetite 6. Concentration difficulties 7. Lassitude 8. Inability to feel 9. Pessimistic thoughts 10. Suicidal thoughts. Higher MADRS score indicates more severe depression, and each item yields a score of 0 to 6. The overall score ranges from 0 to 60. The usual cut-off points are: 0 to 6 = normal/ symptom absent, 7 to 19 = mild depression, 20 to 34 = moderate depression, >34 = severe depression.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 continuing every 12 weeks, Last Visit
Mean Change From Baseline in Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score by Week
The SAS is composed of 10 items. This scale contains 10 items: Gait, Arm dropping, Shoulder shaking, Elbow rigidity, Wrist rigidity, Head rotation, Glabella Tap, Tremor, Salivation, Akathisia. Grade of severity of each item is rated using a 5-point scale, 1 (normal) and 5 (most severe). The total score ranges from 10 to 50. Negative changes from baseline indicate an improvement, with higher negative values indicating better improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 continuing every 12 weeks, Last Visit
Mean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale Score (BARS) Total Score by Week
BARS consisted of 4 items: objective observation of akathisia by study physician, subjective feelings of restlessness by participant, participant distress due to akathisia, global evaluation of akathisia. The first 3 items were rated on a 4-point scale: 0 = absence of symptoms to 3 = severe condition. The global clinical evaluation were made on a 6-point scale, (0=absent, 1=questionable, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=marked, 5=severe). Participants were observed while they were seated and then stood for a minimum of 2 minutes in each position. Symptoms observed in other situations (e.g., while engaged in neutral conversation or engaged in activity on the ward) may also be rated. Subjective phenomena were elicited by direct questioning. The BARS Global Score was derived from the global clinical assessment of akathisia from the BARS panel. Total score ranges from 0 to 14. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement, with higher negative values indicating better improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 continuing every 12 weeks, Last Visit
Mean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale Score (AIMS) Total Score by Week
The AIMS assessment consisted of 10 items describing symptoms of dyskinesia. Facial and oral movements (items 1 through 4), extremity movements (items 5 and 6), and trunk movements (item 7) were observed unobtrusively while the participant was at rest (e.g., in the waiting room), and the study physician would make global judgments on the participant's dyskinesia's (items 8 through 10). For this scale, the participant was seated on a hard, firm chair. These items are rated on a five-point scale: 0 (none), 1 (minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 40. Negative changes from baseline indicate an improvement, with higher negative values indicating better improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 continuing every 12 weeks, Last Visit
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
The AEs were one of the primary parameters to measure the safety and tolerability of individual participants. The AEs were captured for all participants from the time the ICF was signed until the end of the trial.
Measured: Baseline to Last Visit
Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Relevance
The vital signs were one of the primary parameters to measure the safety and tolerability of individual participants. Incidence of TEAEs of potential clinical relevance included abnormal values in heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respiratory rate and weight that were identified based on pre-defined criteria.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 continuing every 12 weeks, Last Visit
Percentage of Participants With ECG Measurements of Potential Clinical Relevance
The measurement of ECG was one of the primary parameters to measure the safety and tolerability of individual participants. Incidence of TEAEs of potential clinical relevance include abnormal changes in heart rate and ECG intervals of PR, QRS, QT, QTcB, and QTcF that were identified based on pre-defined criteria.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 continuing every 12 weeks, Last Visit
Percentage of Participants With Laboratory Values of Potential Clinical Relevance
The laboratory values were one of the primary parameters to measure the safety and tolerability of individual participants. Incidence of TEAEs of potential clinical relevance include abnormal values in serum chemistry, hematology, urinalyses and prolactin tests that were identified based on pre-defined criteria.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 continuing every 12 weeks, Last Visit
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 May 2015 (estimated)
- Study startApr 1998
- Primary completionDec 2012
- Study completionDec 2012
Why it stopped: Study terminated when aripiprazole available commercially per protocol
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for SchizophreniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 631 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02435836
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 31-97-303
- Status last verified
- Aug 2015
- First submitted
- 15 Apr 2015
- Last updated
- 21 Sep 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Sep 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Open-Label Follow-on Study of the Long-Term Safety of Aripiprazole in Patients With Chronic Schizophrenia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02435836
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 31-97-303
- Conditions
- Schizophrenia
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Study terminated when aripiprazole available commercially per protocol
- Enrolment
- 631 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Apr 1998
- Primary completion
- Dec 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 May 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 21 Sep 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of the study was to determine the safety of aripiprazole administered long-term in doses ranging from 10 to 30 mg per day as a maintenance therapy in subjects with chronic or first episode of schizophrenia. Information on the continued efficacy of aripiprazole was also gathered in this long-term trial (until 31 Dec 2012 or until aripiprazole was otherwise available through marketed means and/or reimbursed).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Aripiprazole | Experimental | Drug: AripiprazoleAll subjects began open-label treatment with 30 mg aripiprazole on the first day of participation in the current trial. Once a subject stabilized at the 30 mg per day dose, the investigator could adjust the dose within the range of 10 to 30 mg per day as needed (throughout this long-term trial), to manage AEs. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Complete a Prior Study: each patient must meet one of the following conditions for completion of the prior study:
- Signing of Informed Consent Form: Prior to any procedure or drug administration, each patient must sign an informed consent form. In addition, if required by the Ethical Committee, each patient's next-of-kin or responsible caregiver will co-sign the patient's consent form or a separate consent form.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients suffering from any significant somatic disease or medical problem that would obscure the results of treatment, or that might require frequent changes of concomitant medication.
- Patients with any acute or unstable medical condition requiring pharmacotherapy, other than schizophrenia.
- Patients with an abnormal laboratory test value in the most recent analysis (from the study 31-97-301 or 31-98-304-01) which is considered by the investigator as presenting a significant risk to the patient for continuing treatment with aripiprazole.
- Patients who were early-terminated from the prior double-blind studies (31-97-301 or 31-98-304-01) due to a serious adverse event (SAE) other than worsening of psychosis or hospitalization.
- Female patients of child bearing potential with a positive serum pregnancy test at the baseline (last visit of prior study) of this open-label follow-on study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AripiprazoleAlso: Abilify | Drug | Aripiprazole |
Primary outcome
Mean Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score by Week
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 continuing every 12 weeks, Last Visit
The PANSS consisted of three subscales: a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 (absence of symptoms) and a score of 7 (extremely severe symptoms). The PANSS total score was the sum of the rating scores for 7 positive scale items, 7 negative scale items, and 16 general psychopathology scale items from the PANSS panel. The PANSS total score ranged from 30 (best possible outcome) to 210 (worst possible outcome).
Mean Change From Baseline in PANSS Positive Sub-scale Score by Week
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 continuing every 12 weeks, Last Visit
The PANSS consisted of three subscales: a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 (absence of symptoms) and a score of 7 (extremely severe symptoms). The PANSS positive subscale score was the sum of the rating scores for the 7 positive scale items from the PANSS panel. The 7 positive symptom constructs are delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinatory behavior, excitement, grandiosity, suspiciousness/persecution, and hostility. The PANSS Positive Subscale ranges from 7 (absence of symptoms) to 49 (extremely severe symptoms).
Mean Change From Baseline in PANSS Negative Sub-scale Score by Week
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 continuing every 12 weeks, Last Visit
The PANSS consisted of three subscales: a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 (absence of symptoms) and a score of 7 (extremely severe symptoms). The PANSS negative subscale score was the sum of the rating scores for the 7 negative scale items from the PANSS panel. The 7 negative symptom constructs: blunted affect, emotional withdrawal, poor rapport, passive apathetic withdrawal, difficulty in abstract thinking, lack of spontaneity and flow of conversation, stereotyped thinking. The PANSS Negative Subscale ranges from 7 (absence of symptoms) to 49 (extremely severe symptoms).
Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) by Week
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 continuing every 12 weeks, Last Visit
The severity of illness for each participant was rated using the CGI-S scale. To assess CGI-S, the study physician answered the following question: "Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill is the participant at this time?" Response choices included: 0 = not assessed; 1 = normal, not ill at all; 2 = borderline mentally ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; and 7 = among the most extremely ill participants.
Mean Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) by Week
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 continuing every 12 weeks, Last Visit
The efficacy of trial medication were rated for each participant using the CGI-I scale. The study physician must rate the participant's total improvement whether or not it is due entirely to drug treatment. All responses were compared to the participant's condition at baseline. Response choices include: 0 = not assessed; 1 =very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 =minimally worse; 6 = much worse; and 7 = very much worse.
Mean Change From Baseline in Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 continuing every 12 weeks, Last Visit
The MADRS is a ten-item diagnostic questionnaire which psychiatrists use to measure the severity of depressive episodes in participants with mood disorders. The questionnaire includes questions on the following symptoms. 1. Apparent sadness 2. Reported sadness 3. Inner tension 4. Reduced sleep 5. Reduced appetite 6. Concentration difficulties 7. Lassitude 8. Inability to feel 9. Pessimistic thoughts 10. Suicidal thoughts. Higher MADRS score indicates more severe depression, and each item yields a score of 0 to 6. The overall score ranges from 0 to 60. The usual cut-off points are: 0 to 6 = normal/ symptom absent, 7 to 19 = mild depression, 20 to 34 = moderate depression, >34 = severe depression.
Mean Change From Baseline in Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score by Week
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 continuing every 12 weeks, Last Visit
The SAS is composed of 10 items. This scale contains 10 items: Gait, Arm dropping, Shoulder shaking, Elbow rigidity, Wrist rigidity, Head rotation, Glabella Tap, Tremor, Salivation, Akathisia. Grade of severity of each item is rated using a 5-point scale, 1 (normal) and 5 (most severe). The total score ranges from 10 to 50. Negative changes from baseline indicate an improvement, with higher negative values indicating better improvement.
Mean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale Score (BARS) Total Score by Week
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 continuing every 12 weeks, Last Visit
BARS consisted of 4 items: objective observation of akathisia by study physician, subjective feelings of restlessness by participant, participant distress due to akathisia, global evaluation of akathisia. The first 3 items were rated on a 4-point scale: 0 = absence of symptoms to 3 = severe condition. The global clinical evaluation were made on a 6-point scale, (0=absent, 1=questionable, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=marked, 5=severe). Participants were observed while they were seated and then stood for a minimum of 2 minutes in each position. Symptoms observed in other situations (e.g., while engaged in neutral conversation or engaged in activity on the ward) may also be rated. Subjective phenomena were elicited by direct questioning. The BARS Global Score was derived from the global clinical assessment of akathisia from the BARS panel. Total score ranges from 0 to 14. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement, with higher negative values indicating better improvement.
Mean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale Score (AIMS) Total Score by Week
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 continuing every 12 weeks, Last Visit
The AIMS assessment consisted of 10 items describing symptoms of dyskinesia. Facial and oral movements (items 1 through 4), extremity movements (items 5 and 6), and trunk movements (item 7) were observed unobtrusively while the participant was at rest (e.g., in the waiting room), and the study physician would make global judgments on the participant's dyskinesia's (items 8 through 10). For this scale, the participant was seated on a hard, firm chair. These items are rated on a five-point scale: 0 (none), 1 (minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 40. Negative changes from baseline indicate an improvement, with higher negative values indicating better improvement.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Time frame: Baseline to Last Visit
The AEs were one of the primary parameters to measure the safety and tolerability of individual participants. The AEs were captured for all participants from the time the ICF was signed until the end of the trial.
Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Relevance
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 continuing every 12 weeks, Last Visit
The vital signs were one of the primary parameters to measure the safety and tolerability of individual participants. Incidence of TEAEs of potential clinical relevance included abnormal values in heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respiratory rate and weight that were identified based on pre-defined criteria.
Percentage of Participants With ECG Measurements of Potential Clinical Relevance
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 continuing every 12 weeks, Last Visit
The measurement of ECG was one of the primary parameters to measure the safety and tolerability of individual participants. Incidence of TEAEs of potential clinical relevance include abnormal changes in heart rate and ECG intervals of PR, QRS, QT, QTcB, and QTcF that were identified based on pre-defined criteria.
Percentage of Participants With Laboratory Values of Potential Clinical Relevance
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 continuing every 12 weeks, Last Visit
The laboratory values were one of the primary parameters to measure the safety and tolerability of individual participants. Incidence of TEAEs of potential clinical relevance include abnormal values in serum chemistry, hematology, urinalyses and prolactin tests that were identified based on pre-defined criteria.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Sep 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Schizophrenia
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Long-term Safety and Tolerability of Xanomeline and Trospium Chloride for the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders in Children and Adolescents
Schizophrenia, Autism-Related Irritability
Not yet recruiting
Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia
Treatment Resistant Disorders
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Sleep Monitoring for Early Detection of Relapse in People With Schizophrenia or Bipolar Disorder Receiving Usual Treatment
Bipolar Disorder (BD), SCHIZOPHRENIA 1 (Disorder)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Pharmacokinetics and Relative Bioavailability of Intranasal vs Intramuscular Olanzapine in Healthy Adult Participants
Healthy Adult Participants
Active, not recruiting
Designing and Evaluating a Classroom-Based Mental Health Programme for Adolescents.
Mental Health Promotion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Aripiprazole in people with Schizophrenia, run by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc..
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Sep 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Sep 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score by Week (time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 continuing every 12 weeks, Last Visit). The study lists 13 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Sep 2015.