TumorsPhase 1/2NCT02432274
Study of Lenvatinib in Children and Adolescents With Refractory or Relapsed Solid Malignancies and Young Adults With Osteosarcoma
A Phase 1/2 study testing Lenvatinib, Ifosfamide and Etoposide in people with Tumors and Solid Malignant Tumors, run by Eisai Limited at 19 sites in 6 countries.
Trial summary
This is a phase 1/2 study evaluating safety, tolerability, and efficacy of lenvatinib as single-agent, and in combination with chemotherapy (ifosfamide and etoposide) in children and adolescents with refractory or relapsed solid malignancies including differentiated thyroid carcinoma (single agent lenvatinib) and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 2 to 25 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Tumors, Solid Malignant Tumors, Osteosarcoma
- What is being tested?
- Lenvatinib, Ifosfamide and Etoposide
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 117 participants
- Where
- 19 sitesin 6 countries
- Study dates
- 29 Dec 2014to 20 Jul 2022
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 2 to 25 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of solid malignant tumor.
- Cohort 1: Any solid malignant tumor.
- Cohort 2A: Differentiated Thyroid Cancer (DTC) with one of the following histological subtypes:
- Papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). i.a) Follicular variant. i.b) Other variants (including but not limited to tall cell, columnar cell, cribriform-morular, solid, oxyphil, Warthin's-like, trabecular, tumor with nodular fasciitis-like stroma, Hurthle cell variant of papillary carcinoma, or poorly differentiated carcinomas).
- Follicular thyroid cancer (FTC). ii.a) Hurthle cell. ii.b) Clear cell. ii.c) Insular.
- Cohort 2B, 3A, and 3B: Relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma.
Show all 51Show fewer
- Relapsed or refractory solid tumor malignancy that has progressed on standard anticancer therapy with no available curative options. (Note: Osteosarcoma participants must be in first or subsequent relapse [greater than or equal to first relapse]). Only the osteosarcoma participants enrolled to Cohorts 3A and 3B must be deemed candidates for ifosfamide and etoposide chemotherapy).
- Evaluable or measurable disease that meets the following criteria:
- Participants must have evaluable or measurable disease based on RECIST 1.1 using computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
- Lesions that have had external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or locoregional therapies such as radiofrequency (RF) ablation must have subsequently grown unequivocally to be deemed a target lesion.
- DTC participants must be 131 iodine-refractory/ relapsed as defined by at least one of the following:
- One or more evaluable or measurable lesions that do not demonstrate iodine uptake on any radioiodine scan; or
- One or more evaluable or measurable lesions that have progressed based on RECIST 1.1, within 12 months of 131 iodine therapy, despite demonstration of radioiodine avidity at the time of that treatment by pre- or post-treatment scanning. These participants must not be eligible for possible curative surgery; or
- Cumulative activity of 131 iodine greater than 400 millicuries (mCi) or 14.8 gigabecquerels (GBq), with the last dose administered at least 6 months prior to study entry.
- Participants with DTC must be receiving thyroxine suppression therapy and levels of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) should not be elevated (TSH should be less than or equal to 5.50 milliunits per liter (mU/L)). When tolerated by the participant, thyroxine dose should be changed to achieve TSH suppression (TSH less than 0.50 mU/L).
- Participants with known central nervous system (CNS) primary tumors or metastases who have completed brain therapy (such as radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, or surgical resection) and have remained clinically stable, asymptomatic, and off of steroids for 2 weeks prior to Cycle 1 Day 1 will be eligible.
- Male or female participants age 2 years to less than18 years and less than or equal to 25 years for osteosarcoma subjects at the time of informed consent.
- Lansky play score greater than or equal to 50% or Karnofsky Performance Status score greater than or equal to 50%. Use Karnofsky for participants greater than or equal to 16 years of age and Lansky for participants less than 16 years of age.
- Life expectancy greater than or equal to 3 months.
- Adequate bone marrow function as evidenced by:
- absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than or equal to 1.0 x 10^9/L (for Cohorts 3A and 3B leucocyte count greater than or equal to 2 x 10^9/L; participants with bone marrow involvement should have ANC greater than or equal to 0.8 x 10^9/L and leucocyte count greater than or equal to 1 x 10^9/L).
- hemoglobin greater than or equal to 8.0 grams/deciliter (g/dL) (a hemoglobin less than 8.0 g/dL is acceptable if it is corrected by growth factor or transfusion before starting lenvatinib).
- platelet count greater than or equal to 75 x 10^9/L.
- Adequate liver function as evidenced by:
- bilirubin less than or equal 1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN).
- alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) less than or equal to 3 times ULN.
- Adequate renal function as evidenced by:
- Serum creatinine based on age/gender as below. If serum creatinine is greater than maximum serum creatinine for age/gender as shown in the table below, then creatinine clearance (or radioisotope glomerular filtration rate [GFR]) must be greater than 70 milliliter/minute/1.73 square meter (mL/min/1.73 m2).
- Maximum Serum Creatinine in milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL) for male:
- Age 2 to less than 6 years = 0.8
- Age 6 to less than 10 years = 1.0
- Age 10 to less than 13 years = 1.2
- Age 13 to less than 16 years = 1.5
- Age greater than or equal to 16 years = 1.7
- Maximum Serum Creatinine (mg/dL) for Female:
- Age 2 to less than 6 years = 0.8
- Age 6 to less than 10 years = 1.0
- Age 10 to less than 13 years = 1.2
- Age 13 to less than 16 years = 1.4
- Age greater than or equal to 16 years = 1.4
- The threshold creatinine values in this Table were derived from the Schwartz formula for estimating glomerular filtration rate using child length and stature data published by the CDC.
- Urine dipstick less than 2+ for proteinuria. Participants who have greater than or equal to 2+ proteinuria on dipstick urinalysis should undergo a spot protein-creatinine (P/C) ratio that should be Grade less than 2.
- No clinical evidence of nephrotic syndrome.
- Adequate cardiac function as evidenced by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) greater than or equal to 50%) at baseline as determined by echocardiography.
- Adequately controlled blood pressure (BP) with or without antihypertensive medications, defined as:
- BP less than 95th percentile for sex, age, and height/length at screening (as per National Heart Lung and Blood Institute guidelines) and no change in antihypertensive medications within 1-week prior to Cycle 1/Day 1. Osteosarcoma subjects 18 to 25 years should have BP ≤150/90 mm Hg at screening and no change in antihypertensive therapy within 1 week prior to Cycle 1/Day 1.
- Washout of 3 weeks in case of prior chemotherapy, 6 weeks if treatment included nitrosoureas; 4 weeks for definitive radiotherapy, and 2 weeks for palliative radiotherapy; 3 months from high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell rescue; 3 weeks from major surgery. Participants must have recovered from the acute toxic effects of all prior anticancer therapy before enrollment into the study.
- Written and signed informed consent from the parent(s) or legal representative (guardian) and assent from the minor participant. Written informed consent from subjects ≥18 years.
- Willing and able to comply with the protocol, scheduled follow-up, and management of toxicity as judged by the Investigator.
- Cohort 3B (Combination Expansion): Osteosarcoma subjects who progressed in Cohorts 1 or 2B and opt to receive combination therapy.
- Osteosarcoma participants receiving combination therapy of lenvatinib with ifosfamide and etoposide should meet only Inclusion Criteria Numbers 6 through 17 (after progression in Cohort 2B).
Who cannot join
- Any active infection or infectious illness unless fully recovered prior to dosing.
- Any medical or other condition that in the opinion of the investigator(s) would preclude the participant's participation in a clinical study.
- Other organ toxicity due to prior anticancer therapy (investigational agent, chemotherapy, or radiation therapy) except alopecia, and ototoxicity due to cisplatin not already covered in the inclusion/exclusion criteria, which has not recovered to Grade less than 2 per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0.
- Known hypersensitivity to any component of the product (lenvatinib or ingredients).
- Concurrent administration of any other antitumor therapy.
- Previous treatment with lenvatinib (except for participants previously enrolled into Cohorts 1 or 2B of this study).
Show all 16Show fewer
- Two or more prior vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGF/VEGFR) targeted therapies.
- Currently receiving any investigational drug or device in another clinical trial or within 30 days preceding informed consent.
- A clinically significant ECG abnormality, including a marked baseline prolonged QT or QTc interval (eg, a repeated demonstration of a QTc interval greater than 480 msec).
- Gastrointestinal malabsorption or any other condition that in the opinion of the investigator might affect the absorption of lenvatinib.
- Gastrointestinal bleeding or active hemoptysis (bright red blood of at least half teaspoon) within 3 weeks prior to the first dose of study drug.
- Active second malignancy within 2 years prior to enrollment ([in addition to the primary tumor types specified by cohort in Inclusion Criterion Number 1], but not including definitively treated superficial melanoma, in-situ, basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin).
- Previous treatment with ifosfamide and Grade greater than or equal to 3 nephrotoxicity or encephalopathy (Cohorts 3A and 3B).
- Females who are breastfeeding or pregnant at Screening or Baseline (as documented by a positive beta-human chorionic gonadotropin [ß-hCG] (or human chorionic gonadotropin [hCG]) test with a minimum sensitivity of 25 IU/L or equivalent units of ß-hCG [or hCG]). A separate baseline assessment is required if a negative screening pregnancy test was obtained more than 72 hours before the first dose of study drug.
- Cohort 3B (Combination Expansion): Osteosarcoma participants who progressed in Cohorts 1 or 2B and opt to receive combination therapy.
- Osteosarcoma participants receiving combination therapy of lenvatinib with ifosfamide and etoposide should meet all the exclusion criteria, with the exception of Criterion Number 6.
Trial locations and contacts
19 sites in 6 countries.
19 sites in 6 countries
France7 sites
Centre Oscar Lambret Lille
Lille, Rhone
Centre Leon Berard
Lyon, Rhone
CHU Nantes - Hopital Mere-Enfant
Nantes
Institut Curie - Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer (CLCC) de Paris
Paris
Institut Gustave Roussy
Paris
CHU Strasbourg - Hopital Hautepierre
Strasbourg, Bas Rhin
CHU de Toulouse - Hopital des Enfants
Toulouse
Italy3 sites
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Bologna
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori
Milan
Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesu
Roma
Spain3 sites
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona
Hospital Infantil Universitario Nino Jesus
Madrid
Hospital Universitario y Politecnico La Fe Hospital La Fe Valencia
Valencia
United Kingdom3 sites
Birmingham Children's Hospital
Birmingham
University College London Hospital
London
Royal Victoria Infirmary
Newcastle
Germany2 sites
Universitaetsklinikum Muenster
Münster
Kinderklinik des Olga hospitals
Stuttgart
About this study
Official title: Phase 1/2 Study of Lenvatinib in Children and Adolescents With Refractory or Relapsed Solid Malignancies and Young Adults With Osteosarcoma
This is a phase 1/2 study evaluating safety, tolerability, and efficacy of lenvatinib as single-agent, and in combination with chemotherapy (ifosfamide and etoposide) in children and adolescents with refractory or relapsed solid malignancies including differentiated thyroid carcinoma (single agent lenvatinib) and osteosarcoma (single agent and combination lenvatinib).
Read the detailed description
The study consists of 5 cohorts:
Cohort 1 (Single-Agent Dose-Finding) dose-escalation to find the recommended dose (RD) of lenvatinib using time-to-event continual reassessment method (TiTE-CRM) in children and adolescents with relapsed or refractory solid malignant tumors. When the RD is identified, Cohorts 2A, 2B, and 3A will enroll in parallel.
Cohort 2 (Single-Agent Expansion) will evaluate the efficacy of lenvatinib at the RD in children, adolescents, and young adults with
- 131 iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) [Cohort 2A] or
- Relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma [Cohort 2B]
Cohort 3A (Combination Dose-Finding) will determine the RD of lenvatinib in combination with ifosfamide and etoposide in children, adolescents, and young adults with relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma.
Cohort 3B (Combination Expansion) will evaluate the efficacy of lenvatinib at the RD from Cohort 3A in combination with ifosfamide and etoposide in children, adolescents, and young adults with relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma. Participants with osteosarcoma who have enrolled into Cohort 1 or 2B and experienced progressive disease will also be candidates for enrollment in Cohort 3B.
Lenvatinib will be provided as hard capsules containing 1, 4, or 10 mg lenvatinib. Lenvatinib capsules should be dissolved in water or apple juice for those who are unable to swallow capsules.
- Being tested
- Lenvatinib, Ifosfamide, Etoposide
- Keywords
- E7080, Lenvatinib, Solid malignancies, Osteosarcoma, Differentiated Thyroid Cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms, Osteosarcoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LenvatinibDrug
Also called E7080, lenvatinib
Cohort 1: Lenvatinib will be administered orally, once daily on Days 1 to 28 of each 28-day cycle at a starting dose of 11 mg/m2. Dose can be de-escalated to 9 mg/m2 or escalated to 14 and 17 mg/m2.
LenvatinibDrug
Also called E7080, lenvatinib
Cohort 2A: Lenvatinib (RD determined in Cohort 1) will be administered orally, once daily on Days 1 to 28 of each 28-day cycle.
LenvatinibDrug
Also called E7080, lenvatinib
Cohort 2B: Lenvatinib (RD determined in Cohort 1) will be administered orally, once daily on Days 1 to 28 of each 28-day cycle.
LenvatinibDrug
Also called E7080, lenvatinib
Cohort 3A: Lenvatinib will be administered orally, once daily on Days 1 to 21 of each 21-day cycle at 20% lower than RD determined in Cohort 1 (starting dose). Lenvatinib dose can be escalated to the RD from Cohort 1 or de-escalated to 40 and 60% lower than the RD from Cohort 1.
LenvatinibDrug
Also called E7080, lenvatinib
Cohort 3B: Lenvatinib will be administered orally, once daily on Days 1 to 21 of each 21-day cycle at the RD as determined in Cohort 3A.
IfosfamideDrug
Ifosfamide 3000 mg/m2/day (starting dose) will be administered on Days 1 to 3 of each 21-day cycle for a total of 5 cycles. Ifosfamide dose can be de-escalated to 2400 mg/m2/day and 1800 mg/m2/day.
EtoposideDrug
Etoposide 100 mg/m2/day (starting dose) will be administered on Days 1 to 3 of each 21-day cycle for a total of 5 cycles. Etoposide dose can be de-escalated to 80 mg/m2/day and 60 mg/m2/day.
IfosfamideDrug
Ifosfamide dose identified in Cohort 3A will be administered on Days 1 to 3 of each 21-day cycle for a total of 5 cycles.
EtoposideDrug
Etoposide dose identified in Cohort 3A will be administered on Days 1 to 3 of each 21-day cycle for a total of 5 cycles.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: Single-Agent Dose-Finding | Experimental | Children and adolescents with relapsed or refractory solid malignant tumors. Receives: Drug: Lenvatinib |
| Cohort 2A: Single-agent Expansion (DTC) | Experimental | Children and adolescents with 131 iodine-refractory DTC. Receives: Drug: Lenvatinib |
| Cohort 2B: Single-agent Expansion (Osteosarcoma) | Experimental | Participants with relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma. Receives: Drug: Lenvatinib |
| Cohort 3A: Combination Dose-finding | Experimental | Participants with relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma will receive lenvatinib in combination with ifosfamide and etoposide. Receives: Drug: Lenvatinib; Drug: Ifosfamide; Drug: Etoposide |
| Cohort 3B: Combination Expansion | Experimental | Participants with relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma will receive lenvatinib in combination with ifosfamide and etoposide. Receives: Drug: Lenvatinib; Drug: Ifosfamide; Drug: Etoposide |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cohort 1: Recommended Dose (RD) of Lenvatinib
RD was defined as the dose that had a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) rate closest to the targeted 20% rate. DLT was an adverse drug reaction and was assessed according to common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version (v) 4.03 defined as 1) Grade 4 neutropenia for greater than or equal to (>=) 7 days, 2) Grade >=3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding, or lasting greater than (>) 7 days, 3) Grade >=3 febrile neutropenia, 4) Next course of chemotherapy delayed for >=7 days, 5) Grade >=3 non-hematologic toxicity persisting >7 days optimal supportive care, 6) Grade 4 hypertension, confirmed systolic or diastolic blood pressure >25 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) above the 95th percentile for age, or an elevated diastolic blood pressure (that is, >95th percentile for age) not controlled by a single antihypertensive medication within 14 days of use, 7) Grade 3 proteinuria, 8) Any recurrent Grade 2 non-hematological toxicity requiring >=2 interruption and dose reductions.
Measured: Cycle 1 (28 days)
Cohort 2A: Number of Participants With Objective Response (OR) of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)
OR was defined as participants with best overall response (BOR) of CR or PR as assessed by investigator based on response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version (v) 1.1. For OR, the BOR was defined as the best response (CR or PR for >4 weeks) recorded from the start of the treatment until PD or death whichever occurred first. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (non-lymph nodes). All pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis <10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter (SOD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. PD was defined as at least 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
Measured: From date of first dose of study drug until first documentation of PD or death, whichever occurred first (until the data cut-off date, 31 May 2019)
Cohort 2A: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR)
BOR was defined as the best response of CR or PR for >4 weeks or SD for >=7 weeks recorded from the start of the treatment until PD or death, whichever occurred first based on RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (non-lymph nodes). All pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis <10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest SOD. PD was defined as at least 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
Measured: From first dose of study drug until PD or death, whichever occurred first (until the data cut-off date, 31 May 2019)
Cohorts 2B and 3B: Progression-free Survival (PFS) Rate at Month 4
Progression free survival at Month 4 (PFS-4) rate was defined as the percentage of participants who were alive and without PD at Month 4 after the first dose of study drug, based on RECIST v1.1, using a binomial proportion with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). PD: >= 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, reference-smallest sum recorded in study (sum at baseline if that was smallest). Sum of diameters must have absolute increase of >=5 mm. Appearance of >=1 new lesions also considered PD.
Measured: At Month 4
Cohort 3A: Recommended Dose (RD) of Lenvatinib When Given in Combination With Etoposide and Ifosfamide
RD of lenvatinib when given in combination with ifosfamide and etoposide was defined as dose that resulted in no more than 1 DLT per 6 participants,or hematologic DLT in 1 participant and nonhematologic DLT in another participant per 6 participants,upon repeating same dose level.DLT was adverse drug reaction and assessed per CTCAE v4.03 defined as 1)Grade 4 neutropenia for >=10 days,2)Grade >=3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding,or lasting >=10 days,3)Grade >=3 febrile neutropenia lasting >=7 days,4)Next course of chemotherapy delayed for >=7 days,5)Grade >=3 nonhematologic toxicity persisting >7 days despite optimal supportive care,6)Grade 4 hypertension,confirmed systolic or diastolic blood pressure >25 mmHg above 95th percentile for age,or elevated diastolic blood pressure(>95th percentile for age)not controlled by single antihypertensive medication within 14 days use,7)Grade 3 proteinuria,8)Any recurrent Grade 2 nonhematological toxicity requiring >=2 interruption and dose reductions.
Measured: Cycle 1 (21 days)
Secondary outcomes (16)
Cohorts 1, 2B, 3A, and 3B: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR)
BOR: best response of CR or PR for >4 weeks or SD for >=7 weeks from first dose, recorded from start of treatment until PD or death, whichever occurred first based on RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (non-lymph nodes). All pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in their short axis <10 mm. PR: at least 30% decrease in SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest SOD. PD was defined as: at least 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Not evaluable (NE) means BOR of NE or SD of <7 weeks duration. Unknown means no data were available on the case report form.
Measured: From date of first dose of study drug until PD or death, whichever occurred first (Cohort 1, Cohort 2B: until the data cut-off date, 31 May 2019; Cohort 3A, Cohort 3B: until the data cut-off date, 18 July 2019)
Cohorts 1, 2B, 3A, and 3B: Objective Response Rate (ORR)
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a BOR of CR or PR for >4 weeks or SD for >=7 weeks as assessed by investigator based on RECIST v1.1, recorded from start of study treatment until PD or death whichever occurred first. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (non-lymph nodes). All pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis <10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. 95% CI of the ORR were calculated according to Clopper and Pearson method.
Measured: From date of first dose of study drug until PD or death, whichever occurred first (Cohort 1, Cohort 2B: until the data cut-off date, 31 May 2019; Cohort 3A, Cohort 3B: until the data cut-off date, 18 July 2019)
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A and 3B: Duration of Response (DOR)
DOR was defined as time in months from the first documentation confirmed CR or PR until the first documentation of confirmed PD as assessed by investigator based on RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (non-lymph nodes). All pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis <10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. PD: at least 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. 95% CI for the median were calculated according to Brookmeyer and Crowley method.
Measured: First documentation of CR/PR until first documentation of PD (Cohort 1, Cohort 2A, Cohort 2B: until the data cut-off date, 31 May 2019; Cohort 3A, Cohort 3B: until the data cut-off date, 18 July 2019)
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A and 3B: Number of Participants Who Experienced Disease Control
Participants were defined as having disease control if they had a BOR of CR or PR for >4 weeks, or SD (minimum duration from first dose to SD >=7 weeks) or if participants had a BOR of CR or Non-CR/Non-PD (minimum duration from first dose to Non-CR/Non-PD >=7 weeks) per RECIST v1.1, recorded from first dose until PD or death whichever occurred first. CR: disappearance of all target/non-target lesions (non-lymph nodes). All pathological lymph nodes (target/non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis <10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference smallest SOD. Non-CR/Non-PD: persistence of 1 or more non-target lesions, maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits.
Measured: From first dose of study drug until PD or death, whichever occurred first (Cohort 1, Cohort 2A, Cohort 2B: until the data cut-off date, 31 May 2019; Cohort 3A, Cohort 3B: until the data cut-off date, 18 July 2019)
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A and 3B: Number of Participants Experienced Clinical Benefit
Participants were defined as having clinical benefit if they had a BOR of CR or PR for >4 weeks or durable SD (lasting >=23 weeks) or if participants had a BOR of CR or durable Non-CR/Non-PD (lasting >=23 weeks) as per RECIST v1.1, recorded from first dose until PD or death whichever occurred first. CR: disappearance of all target/non-target lesions (non-lymph nodes). All pathological lymph nodes (whether target/non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis <10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest SOD. Non-CR/Non-PD:persistence of 1 or more non-target lesions and maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits.
Measured: From first dose of study drug until PD or death, whichever occurred first (Cohort 1, Cohort 2A, Cohort 2B: until the data cut-off date, 31 May 2019; Cohort 3A, Cohort 3B: until the data cut-off date, 18 July 2019)
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A and 3B: Progression-free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as the time (in months) from the date of first dose of study drug to the date of first documentation of PD or date of death, whichever occurred first, based on RECIST v1.1. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD of target lesions. 95% CI of median were calculated according to Brookmeyer and Crowley method.
Measured: From first dose of study drug until PD or death, whichever occurred first (Cohort 1, Cohort 2A, Cohort 2B: until the data cut-off date, 31 May 2019; Cohort 3A, Cohort 3B: until the data cut-off date, 18 July 2019)
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A and 3B: Time to Progression (TTP)
TTP was defined as the time from the date of first dose of study drug to the date of first documentation of PD based on RECIST 1.1. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD of target lesions. 95% CI of median were calculated according to Brookmeyer and Crowley method.
Measured: From first dose of study drug until PD (Cohort 1, Cohort 2A, Cohort 2B: until the data cut-off date, 31 May 2019; Cohort 3A, Cohort 3B: until the data cut-off date, 18 July 2019)
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A and 3B: Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time from the date of the first dose of study drug until the date of death from any cause. Participants who are lost to follow-up and those who are alive at the date of data cutoff were censored at the date the participant was last known to be alive (or the data cutoff date). 95% CI of median were calculated according to Brookmeyer and Crowley method.
Measured: From first dose of study drug until death (Cohort 1, Cohort 2A, Cohort 2B: until the data cut-off date, 31 May 2019; Cohort 3A, Cohort 3B: until the data cut-off date, 18 July 2019)
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A and 3B: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Number of participants with TEAEs (serious and non-serious adverse events) and SAEs were reported based on their safety assessments of hematology, clinical chemistry, proximal tibial growth, fecal occult blood, physical examinations, regular measurement of vital signs and electrocardiogram parameter values.
Measured: From the date of first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose (up to approximately 7 years)
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A, and 3B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Worst Post Baseline Measurements on Urine DipStick for Proteinuria
An aliquot of the urine samples were collected to analyze protein by dipstick method, microscopic examination (if protein was abnormal). The dipstick test gives results in a semi-quantitative manner and results for urinalysis parameters of urine protein can be read as "negative, Trace, plus (+) 1, +2, +3 and +4" indicating proportional concentrations in the urine sample. The plus sign increases with a higher level of proteins in the urine.
Measured: Baseline up to approximately 4 years 7 months
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A and 3B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Worst Post Baseline Score in Lansky Performance Play Score
Lansky Performance Play Scale rates a child's activity level for <16 years of age. Scores on scale range from 0 (unresponsive) to 100 ( fully active, normal), where 100=fully active, normal; 90=minor restrictions in physically strenuous activity; 80=active, but tires more quickly; 70=both greater restriction of and less time spent in play activity; 60=up and around, but minimal active play, keeps busy with quieter activities; 50=gets dressed, but lies around much of day, no active play, able to participant in quiet play and activities; 40=mostly in bed, participates in quiet activities; 30=in bed, needs assistance even for quiet play; 20=often sleeping, play entirely limited to very passive activities; 10=no play, does not get out of bed; 0=unresponsive. Higher score indicates more activity and lower indicates less or no activity.
Measured: Baseline up to approximately 4 years 7 months
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A and 3B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Worst Post Baseline Score in Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Scores
KPS: compare effectiveness of medicine for disease and assess outcomes in participants. KPS Scores: recorded on 11 point scale (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 and 100%), where 0=Dead; 10=moribund, fatal processes progressing rapidly; 20=very sick, hospital admission necessary, active supportive treatment necessary; 30=severely disabled, hospital admission is indicated although death not imminent; 40=disabled, requires special care/assistance; 50=requires considerable assistance/frequent medical care; 60=requires occasional assistance, but is able to care for personal needs; 70=cares for self, unable to carry normal activity or active work; 80=normal activity with effort, some signs of disease; 90=able to carry on normal activity, minor signs of disease; 100=normal no complaints, no evidence of disease. Lower score, worse survival for most serious illnesses.
Measured: Baseline up to approximately 4 years 7 months
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A, and 3B: Plasma Concentrations of Lenvatinib
Duration of each cycle for Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B is 28 days. Duration of each cycle for Cohorts 3A, 3B is 21 days.
Measured: Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B: Cycle(C)1 Day(D)1: 0.5-4 hours (h), 6-10 h post-dose, C1D15: pre-dose, 0.5-4 h, 6-10 h post-dose, C2D1: pre-dose, 2-12 h post-dose; Cohorts 3A, 3B: C1D1: 0.5-4 h, 6-10 h post-dose, C2D1: pre-dose, 2-12 h post-dose
Cohort 2B, 3B: Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Biomarkers Level
Serum biomarkers included Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF) 19, FGF 21, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF). In this outcome measure, percent change from baseline in serum biomarkers level per "PFS-4, Yes" and "PFS-4, No" have been reported. As per assessment of investigator based on RECIST v1.1, "PFS-4, Yes"= participants evaluable for PFS-4 month and alive and without PD at 4 months from the first dose, "PFS-4, No"=participants evaluable for PFS-4 month and not alive or with PD at 4 months from the first dose.
Measured: Cohort 2B: Baseline, Cycle 2-3 Day 1 (Duration of each cycle=28 days); Cohort 3B: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1 (Duration of each cycle=21 days)
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A and 3B: Number of Participants With Most Frequent Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Related to Lenvatinib Exposure
TEAEs (serious and non-serious), those occurred most frequently have been reported in this outcome measure. "Palmar-plantar E syndrome" refers to Palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome.
Measured: First dose of study drug until 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cohort 1, Cohort 2A, Cohort 2B: until the data cut-off date, 31 May 2019; Cohort 3A, Cohort 3B: until the data cut-off date, 18 July 2019)
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A and 3B: Number of Participants Categorized Based on Overall Acceptability Questionnaire Responses for Suspension of Lenvatinib
In acceptability questionnaire, participants were asked to answer the overall acceptability of lenvatinib suspension considering the following elements: taste, appearance, smell and how does it feel in the mouth. Overall acceptability was answered in terms of 7 responses: Super good, really good, good, may be good or may be bad, bad, really bad, super bad. Overall acceptability was the overall acceptance for taste, appearance, smell, and the feeling in mouth. In this measure, number of participants have been reported per their overall acceptability responses.
Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Cycle length=28 days for Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B; Cycle length=21 days for Cohorts 3A, 3B)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 May 2015 (estimated)
- Study start29 Dec 2014
- Primary completion18 Jul 2019
- Study completion20 Jul 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for TumorsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 117 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Eisai Limited
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02432274
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- E7080-G000-207
- Other IDs
- 2013-005534-38
- Status last verified
- Aug 2021
- First submitted
- 22 Apr 2015
- Last updated
- 11 Jul 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Gaspar N, Campbell-Hewson Q, Gallego Melcon S, Locatelli F, Venkatramani R, Hecker-Nolting S, Gambart M, Bautista F, Thebaud E, Aerts I, Morland B, Rossig C, Canete Nieto A, Longhi A, Lervat C, Entz-Werle N, Strauss SJ, Marec-Berard P, Okpara CE, He C, Dutta L, Casanova M. Phase I/II study of single-agent lenvatinib in children and adolescents with refractory or relapsed solid malignancies and young adults with osteosarcoma (ITCC-050)☆. ESMO Open. 2021 Oct;6(5):100250. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100250. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
PubMed 34562750Rutkowski P. Antiangiogenic agents combined with systemic chemotherapy in refractory osteosarcoma. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Sep;22(9):1206-1207. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00422-8. Epub 2021 Aug 17. No abstract available.
PubMed 34416160Gaspar N, Venkatramani R, Hecker-Nolting S, Melcon SG, Locatelli F, Bautista F, Longhi A, Lervat C, Entz-Werle N, Casanova M, Aerts I, Strauss SJ, Thebaud E, Morland B, Nieto AC, Marec-Berard P, Gambart M, Rossig C, Okpara CE, He C, Dutta L, Campbell-Hewson Q. Lenvatinib with etoposide plus ifosfamide in patients with refractory or relapsed osteosarcoma (ITCC-050): a multicentre, open-label, multicohort, phase 1/2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Sep;22(9):1312-1321. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00387-9. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
PubMed 34416158Hattinger CM, Patrizio MP, Magagnoli F, Luppi S, Serra M. An update on emerging drugs in osteosarcoma: towards tailored therapies? Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2019 Sep;24(3):153-171. doi: 10.1080/14728214.2019.1654455. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
PubMed 31401903
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Jul 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase 1/2 Study of Lenvatinib in Children and Adolescents With Refractory or Relapsed Solid Malignancies and Young Adults With Osteosarcoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02432274
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- E7080-G000-207
- Keywords
- E7080, Lenvatinib, Solid malignancies, Osteosarcoma, Differentiated Thyroid Cancer
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 117 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Eisai LimitedIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
- Study start
- 29 Dec 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Jul 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 May 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 17 Sep 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a phase 1/2 study evaluating safety, tolerability, and efficacy of lenvatinib as single-agent, and in combination with chemotherapy (ifosfamide and etoposide) in children and adolescents with refractory or relapsed solid malignancies including differentiated thyroid carcinoma (single agent lenvatinib) and osteosarcoma (single agent and combination lenvatinib).
Detailed description
The study consists of 5 cohorts:
Cohort 1 (Single-Agent Dose-Finding) dose-escalation to find the recommended dose (RD) of lenvatinib using time-to-event continual reassessment method (TiTE-CRM) in children and adolescents with relapsed or refractory solid malignant tumors. When the RD is identified, Cohorts 2A, 2B, and 3A will enroll in parallel.
Cohort 2 (Single-Agent Expansion) will evaluate the efficacy of lenvatinib at the RD in children, adolescents, and young adults with
- 131 iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) [Cohort 2A] or
- Relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma [Cohort 2B]
Cohort 3A (Combination Dose-Finding) will determine the RD of lenvatinib in combination with ifosfamide and etoposide in children, adolescents, and young adults with relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma.
Cohort 3B (Combination Expansion) will evaluate the efficacy of lenvatinib at the RD from Cohort 3A in combination with ifosfamide and etoposide in children, adolescents, and young adults with relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma. Participants with osteosarcoma who have enrolled into Cohort 1 or 2B and experienced progressive disease will also be candidates for enrollment in Cohort 3B.
Lenvatinib will be provided as hard capsules containing 1, 4, or 10 mg lenvatinib. Lenvatinib capsules should be dissolved in water or apple juice for those who are unable to swallow capsules.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 5
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: Single-Agent Dose-Finding | Experimental | Drug: LenvatinibChildren and adolescents with relapsed or refractory solid malignant tumors. |
| Cohort 2A: Single-agent Expansion (DTC) | Experimental | Drug: LenvatinibChildren and adolescents with 131 iodine-refractory DTC. |
| Cohort 2B: Single-agent Expansion (Osteosarcoma) | Experimental | Drug: LenvatinibParticipants with relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma. |
| Cohort 3A: Combination Dose-finding | Experimental | Drug: Lenvatinib, Drug: Ifosfamide, Drug: EtoposideParticipants with relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma will receive lenvatinib in combination with ifosfamide and etoposide. |
| Cohort 3B: Combination Expansion | Experimental | Drug: Lenvatinib, Drug: Ifosfamide, Drug: EtoposideParticipants with relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma will receive lenvatinib in combination with ifosfamide and etoposide. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 2 to 25 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (51 listed)
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of solid malignant tumor.
- Relapsed or refractory solid tumor malignancy that has progressed on standard anticancer therapy with no available curative options. (Note: Osteosarcoma participants must be in first or subsequent relapse [greater than or equal to first relapse]). Only the osteosarcoma participants enrolled to Cohorts 3A and 3B must be deemed candidates for ifosfamide and etoposide chemotherapy).
- Evaluable or measurable disease that meets the following criteria:
- DTC participants must be 131 iodine-refractory/ relapsed as defined by at least one of the following:
- Participants with DTC must be receiving thyroxine suppression therapy and levels of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) should not be elevated (TSH should be less than or equal to 5.50 milliunits per liter (mU/L)). When tolerated by the participant, thyroxine dose should be changed to achieve TSH suppression (TSH less than 0.50 mU/L).
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Any active infection or infectious illness unless fully recovered prior to dosing.
- Any medical or other condition that in the opinion of the investigator(s) would preclude the participant's participation in a clinical study.
- Other organ toxicity due to prior anticancer therapy (investigational agent, chemotherapy, or radiation therapy) except alopecia, and ototoxicity due to cisplatin not already covered in the inclusion/exclusion criteria, which has not recovered to Grade less than 2 per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0.
- Known hypersensitivity to any component of the product (lenvatinib or ingredients).
- Concurrent administration of any other antitumor therapy.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LenvatinibAlso: E7080, lenvatinibCohort 1: Lenvatinib will be administered orally, once daily on Days 1 to 28 of each 28-day cycle at a starting dose of 11 mg/m2. Dose can be de-escalated to 9 mg/m2 or escalated to 14 and 17 mg/m2. | Drug | Cohort 1: Single-Agent Dose-Finding |
| LenvatinibAlso: E7080, lenvatinibCohort 2A: Lenvatinib (RD determined in Cohort 1) will be administered orally, once daily on Days 1 to 28 of each 28-day cycle. | Drug | Cohort 2A: Single-agent Expansion (DTC) |
| LenvatinibAlso: E7080, lenvatinibCohort 2B: Lenvatinib (RD determined in Cohort 1) will be administered orally, once daily on Days 1 to 28 of each 28-day cycle. | Drug | Cohort 2B: Single-agent Expansion (Osteosarcoma) |
| LenvatinibAlso: E7080, lenvatinibCohort 3A: Lenvatinib will be administered orally, once daily on Days 1 to 21 of each 21-day cycle at 20% lower than RD determined in Cohort 1 (starting dose). Lenvatinib dose can be escalated to the RD from Cohort 1 or de-escalated to 40 and 60% lower than the RD from Cohort 1. | Drug | Cohort 3A: Combination Dose-finding |
| LenvatinibAlso: E7080, lenvatinibCohort 3B: Lenvatinib will be administered orally, once daily on Days 1 to 21 of each 21-day cycle at the RD as determined in Cohort 3A. | Drug | Cohort 3B: Combination Expansion |
| IfosfamideIfosfamide 3000 mg/m2/day (starting dose) will be administered on Days 1 to 3 of each 21-day cycle for a total of 5 cycles. Ifosfamide dose can be de-escalated to 2400 mg/m2/day and 1800 mg/m2/day. | Drug | Cohort 3A: Combination Dose-finding |
| EtoposideEtoposide 100 mg/m2/day (starting dose) will be administered on Days 1 to 3 of each 21-day cycle for a total of 5 cycles. Etoposide dose can be de-escalated to 80 mg/m2/day and 60 mg/m2/day. | Drug | Cohort 3A: Combination Dose-finding |
| IfosfamideIfosfamide dose identified in Cohort 3A will be administered on Days 1 to 3 of each 21-day cycle for a total of 5 cycles. | Drug | Cohort 3B: Combination Expansion |
| EtoposideEtoposide dose identified in Cohort 3A will be administered on Days 1 to 3 of each 21-day cycle for a total of 5 cycles. | Drug | Cohort 3B: Combination Expansion |
Primary outcome
Cohort 1: Recommended Dose (RD) of Lenvatinib
Time frame: Cycle 1 (28 days)
RD was defined as the dose that had a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) rate closest to the targeted 20% rate. DLT was an adverse drug reaction and was assessed according to common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version (v) 4.03 defined as 1) Grade 4 neutropenia for greater than or equal to (>=) 7 days, 2) Grade >=3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding, or lasting greater than (>) 7 days, 3) Grade >=3 febrile neutropenia, 4) Next course of chemotherapy delayed for >=7 days, 5) Grade >=3 non-hematologic toxicity persisting >7 days optimal supportive care, 6) Grade 4 hypertension, confirmed systolic or diastolic blood pressure >25 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) above the 95th percentile for age, or an elevated diastolic blood pressure (that is, >95th percentile for age) not controlled by a single antihypertensive medication within 14 days of use, 7) Grade 3 proteinuria, 8) Any recurrent Grade 2 non-hematological toxicity requiring >=2 interruption and dose reductions.
Cohort 2A: Number of Participants With Objective Response (OR) of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)
Time frame: From date of first dose of study drug until first documentation of PD or death, whichever occurred first (until the data cut-off date, 31 May 2019)
OR was defined as participants with best overall response (BOR) of CR or PR as assessed by investigator based on response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version (v) 1.1. For OR, the BOR was defined as the best response (CR or PR for >4 weeks) recorded from the start of the treatment until PD or death whichever occurred first. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (non-lymph nodes). All pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis <10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter (SOD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. PD was defined as at least 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
Cohort 2A: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR)
Time frame: From first dose of study drug until PD or death, whichever occurred first (until the data cut-off date, 31 May 2019)
BOR was defined as the best response of CR or PR for >4 weeks or SD for >=7 weeks recorded from the start of the treatment until PD or death, whichever occurred first based on RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (non-lymph nodes). All pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis <10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest SOD. PD was defined as at least 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
Cohorts 2B and 3B: Progression-free Survival (PFS) Rate at Month 4
Time frame: At Month 4
Progression free survival at Month 4 (PFS-4) rate was defined as the percentage of participants who were alive and without PD at Month 4 after the first dose of study drug, based on RECIST v1.1, using a binomial proportion with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). PD: >= 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, reference-smallest sum recorded in study (sum at baseline if that was smallest). Sum of diameters must have absolute increase of >=5 mm. Appearance of >=1 new lesions also considered PD.
Cohort 3A: Recommended Dose (RD) of Lenvatinib When Given in Combination With Etoposide and Ifosfamide
Time frame: Cycle 1 (21 days)
RD of lenvatinib when given in combination with ifosfamide and etoposide was defined as dose that resulted in no more than 1 DLT per 6 participants,or hematologic DLT in 1 participant and nonhematologic DLT in another participant per 6 participants,upon repeating same dose level.DLT was adverse drug reaction and assessed per CTCAE v4.03 defined as 1)Grade 4 neutropenia for >=10 days,2)Grade >=3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding,or lasting >=10 days,3)Grade >=3 febrile neutropenia lasting >=7 days,4)Next course of chemotherapy delayed for >=7 days,5)Grade >=3 nonhematologic toxicity persisting >7 days despite optimal supportive care,6)Grade 4 hypertension,confirmed systolic or diastolic blood pressure >25 mmHg above 95th percentile for age,or elevated diastolic blood pressure(>95th percentile for age)not controlled by single antihypertensive medication within 14 days use,7)Grade 3 proteinuria,8)Any recurrent Grade 2 nonhematological toxicity requiring >=2 interruption and dose reductions.
16 secondary outcomes
Cohorts 1, 2B, 3A, and 3B: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR)
Time frame: From date of first dose of study drug until PD or death, whichever occurred first (Cohort 1, Cohort 2B: until the data cut-off date, 31 May 2019; Cohort 3A, Cohort 3B: until the data cut-off date, 18 July 2019)
Cohorts 1, 2B, 3A, and 3B: Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Time frame: From date of first dose of study drug until PD or death, whichever occurred first (Cohort 1, Cohort 2B: until the data cut-off date, 31 May 2019; Cohort 3A, Cohort 3B: until the data cut-off date, 18 July 2019)
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A and 3B: Duration of Response (DOR)
Time frame: First documentation of CR/PR until first documentation of PD (Cohort 1, Cohort 2A, Cohort 2B: until the data cut-off date, 31 May 2019; Cohort 3A, Cohort 3B: until the data cut-off date, 18 July 2019)
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A and 3B: Number of Participants Who Experienced Disease Control
Time frame: From first dose of study drug until PD or death, whichever occurred first (Cohort 1, Cohort 2A, Cohort 2B: until the data cut-off date, 31 May 2019; Cohort 3A, Cohort 3B: until the data cut-off date, 18 July 2019)
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A and 3B: Number of Participants Experienced Clinical Benefit
Time frame: From first dose of study drug until PD or death, whichever occurred first (Cohort 1, Cohort 2A, Cohort 2B: until the data cut-off date, 31 May 2019; Cohort 3A, Cohort 3B: until the data cut-off date, 18 July 2019)
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A and 3B: Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: From first dose of study drug until PD or death, whichever occurred first (Cohort 1, Cohort 2A, Cohort 2B: until the data cut-off date, 31 May 2019; Cohort 3A, Cohort 3B: until the data cut-off date, 18 July 2019)
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A and 3B: Time to Progression (TTP)
Time frame: From first dose of study drug until PD (Cohort 1, Cohort 2A, Cohort 2B: until the data cut-off date, 31 May 2019; Cohort 3A, Cohort 3B: until the data cut-off date, 18 July 2019)
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A and 3B: Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: From first dose of study drug until death (Cohort 1, Cohort 2A, Cohort 2B: until the data cut-off date, 31 May 2019; Cohort 3A, Cohort 3B: until the data cut-off date, 18 July 2019)
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A and 3B: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: From the date of first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose (up to approximately 7 years)
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A, and 3B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Worst Post Baseline Measurements on Urine DipStick for Proteinuria
Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 4 years 7 months
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A and 3B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Worst Post Baseline Score in Lansky Performance Play Score
Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 4 years 7 months
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A and 3B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Worst Post Baseline Score in Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Scores
Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 4 years 7 months
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A, and 3B: Plasma Concentrations of Lenvatinib
Time frame: Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B: Cycle(C)1 Day(D)1: 0.5-4 hours (h), 6-10 h post-dose, C1D15: pre-dose, 0.5-4 h, 6-10 h post-dose, C2D1: pre-dose, 2-12 h post-dose; Cohorts 3A, 3B: C1D1: 0.5-4 h, 6-10 h post-dose, C2D1: pre-dose, 2-12 h post-dose
Cohort 2B, 3B: Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Biomarkers Level
Time frame: Cohort 2B: Baseline, Cycle 2-3 Day 1 (Duration of each cycle=28 days); Cohort 3B: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1 (Duration of each cycle=21 days)
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A and 3B: Number of Participants With Most Frequent Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Related to Lenvatinib Exposure
Time frame: First dose of study drug until 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cohort 1, Cohort 2A, Cohort 2B: until the data cut-off date, 31 May 2019; Cohort 3A, Cohort 3B: until the data cut-off date, 18 July 2019)
Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B, 3A and 3B: Number of Participants Categorized Based on Overall Acceptability Questionnaire Responses for Suspension of Lenvatinib
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Cycle length=28 days for Cohorts 1, 2A, 2B; Cycle length=21 days for Cohorts 3A, 3B)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Jul 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34562750Gaspar N, Campbell-Hewson Q, Gallego Melcon S, Locatelli F, Venkatramani R, Hecker-Nolting S, Gambart M, Bautista F, Thebaud E, Aerts I, Morland B, Rossig C, Canete Nieto A, Longhi A, Lervat C, Entz-Werle N, Strauss SJ, Marec-Berard P, Okpara CE, He C, Dutta L, Casanova M. Phase I/II study of single-agent lenvatinib in children and adolescents with refractory or relapsed solid malignancies and young adults with osteosarcoma (ITCC-050)☆. ESMO Open. 2021 Oct;6(5):100250. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100250. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34416160Rutkowski P. Antiangiogenic agents combined with systemic chemotherapy in refractory osteosarcoma. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Sep;22(9):1206-1207. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00422-8. Epub 2021 Aug 17. No abstract available.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34416158Gaspar N, Venkatramani R, Hecker-Nolting S, Melcon SG, Locatelli F, Bautista F, Longhi A, Lervat C, Entz-Werle N, Casanova M, Aerts I, Strauss SJ, Thebaud E, Morland B, Nieto AC, Marec-Berard P, Gambart M, Rossig C, Okpara CE, He C, Dutta L, Campbell-Hewson Q. Lenvatinib with etoposide plus ifosfamide in patients with refractory or relapsed osteosarcoma (ITCC-050): a multicentre, open-label, multicohort, phase 1/2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Sep;22(9):1312-1321. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00387-9. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31401903Hattinger CM, Patrizio MP, Magagnoli F, Luppi S, Serra M. An update on emerging drugs in osteosarcoma: towards tailored therapies? Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2019 Sep;24(3):153-171. doi: 10.1080/14728214.2019.1654455. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
Related trials for Tumors
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
19 sites in 6 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing Lenvatinib, Ifosfamide and Etoposide in people with Tumors and Solid Malignant Tumors, run by Eisai Limited at 19 sites in 6 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 51 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jul 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 19 sites in France, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom, Germany and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Sep 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cohort 1: Recommended Dose (RD) of Lenvatinib (time frame: Cycle 1 (28 days)). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02432274, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jul 2023.