AzTrials
AzTrials

Early Stage Breast CancerReact-GNCT02428114

A Multi Centre Study to Determine the Feasibility of Using an Integrated Consent Model to Compare Standard of Care Administration Schedules of G-CSF (Filgrastim) for Primary Prophylaxis of Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia in Early Stage Breast Cancer (React-G Study)

An observational study of Early Stage Breast Cancer, run by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute at 2 sites in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In patients with early-stage breast cancer, chemotherapy has substantially improved survival rates for breast cancer patients. Improvements in outcomes, however, are compromised by the considerable toxicities associated with chemotherapy, most notable being neutropenia. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 19 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Early Stage Breast Cancer
How many people
142 participants
Where
2 sitesCanada
Study dates
May 2015to Mar 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 19 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Newly diagnosed breast cancer patients, who will be receiving FEC-D, AC-D, dose dense AC-T, TC or TAC chemotherapy will be eligible.

Who may be able to join

  • Histologically confirmed primary breast cancer
  • Planned to start docetaxel component of FEC-D or AC-D, or first cycle of; dose-dense AC-T, TC, FEC-D or TAC chemotherapy
  • ≥19 years of age
  • Able to provide verbal consent

Who cannot join

  • Contraindication to Filgrastim

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Canada2 sites
  • Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario at Kingston General Hospital

    Kingston, Ontario

  • The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

    Ottawa, Ontario

Other trials in Canada

About this study

In patients with early-stage breast cancer, chemotherapy has substantially improved survival rates for breast cancer patients. Improvements in outcomes, however, are compromised by the considerable toxicities associated with chemotherapy, most notable being neutropenia. Neutropenia is the presence of abnormally few white blood cells, leading to increased susceptibility to infection and can require hospitalization and need for intravenous antibiotics and is sometimes fatal. Febrile neutropenia can also be associated with treatment delays and dose reductions, potentially compromising treatment efficacy. Patients can receive medication to reduce the risk of febrile neutropenia, such as Neupogen (Filgrastim) as a daily injection for 5, 7, or 10 days. Since there is genuine uncertainty amongst healthcare professionals as to which administration schedule of Neupogen is better, investigators are performing a randomized study in which patients are put into a group by chance to give participants one of three standards of Neupogen daily injection. Neupogen can cost approximately $200 per injection, so if a physician prescribes 10 days for 8 cycles of treatment this can cost $16,000 compared to a 5 day prescription which would cost half this. In addition to cost savings, many patients are not able to give themselves injections on a daily basis and require nursing resources which are utilized at high-cost. This study will use an "integrated consent model" that involves an "oral consent" rather than a written informed consenting process in order to increase the number of patients who may participate while performing a study at a lower cost. While determining the optimal treatment will improve patient comfort and acceptability, using the minimal safe duration of administration may also offer cost savings.

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02428114
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
5 days of filgrastimStandard of care
7 days of filgrastimStandard of care
10 days of filgrastimStandard of care

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Feasibility of performing this study will be measured with composite endpoints: physician engagement, time for local or provincial research ethics approval, accrual rates, and patient/physician compliance.

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Rates of documented febrile neutropenia (laboratory confirmation)

    Measured: 1 year

  2. ANC results at the end of each cycle of chemotherapy.

    Measured: 1 year

  3. hospital admissions

    Measured: 1 year

  4. percentage of patients who require chemotherapy dose delays

    Measured: 1 year

  5. percentage of patients who require chemotherapy dose decrease

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Apr 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2015
  3. Primary completionMar 2017
  4. Study completionMar 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrolment
142 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02428114
Sponsor's protocol ID
OTT 14-05
Acronym
React-G
Status last verified
Sep 2017
First submitted
15 Apr 2015
Last updated
29 Sep 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Clemons M, Fergusson D, Simos D, Mates M, Robinson A, Califaretti N, Zibdawi L, Bahl M, Raphael J, Ibrahim MFK, Fernandes R, Pitre L, Aseyev O, Stober C, Vandermeer L, Saunders D, Hutton B, Mallick R, Pond GR, Awan A, Hilton J. A multicentre, randomised trial comparing schedules of G-CSF (filgrastim) administration for primary prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in early stage breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2020 Jul;31(7):951-957. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.04.005. Epub 2020 Apr 20.

    PubMed 32325257
  • Ibrahim MFK, Hilton J, Mazzarello S, Fergusson D, Hutton B, Robinson A, Califaretti N, Hsu T, Gertler S, Mates M, Stober C, Vandermeer L, Mallick R, Clemons M. A multi-center pragmatic, randomized, feasibility trial comparing standard of care schedules of filgrastim administration for primary febrile neutropenia prophylaxis in early-stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Apr;168(2):371-379. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4604-y. Epub 2017 Dec 6.

    PubMed 29214415

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Early Stage Breast Cancer, run by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute at 2 sites in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Sep 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Feasibility of performing this study will be measured with composite endpoints: physician engagement, time for local or provincial research ethics approval, accrual rates, and patient/physician compliance. (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02428114, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Sep 2017.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in