Sclerosing CholangitisPhase 1/2NCT02424175
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for the Treatment of Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis.
A Phase 1/2 study testing Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in people with Sclerosing Cholangitis, run by Brigham and Women's Hospital at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This is an open-label single-arm pilot study to measure the safety, microbiological and clinical impacts of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) in patients with Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Sclerosing Cholangitis
- What is being tested?
- Fecal Microbiota Transplantation
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2016to 8 May 2018
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18 or older
- Confirmed diagnosis of PSC (with a concurrent diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease) characterized by a cholestatic liver condition of greater than 6 months duration with confirmatory cholangiographic findings, as well as an elevation of the serum alkaline phosphatase of greater than 1.5 times the upper limit of normal.
Who cannot join
- Decompensated liver disease
- Patients who were pregnant or breastfeeding
- Use of concomitant immune modulators including methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, cyclosporine, thalidomide, Interleukin-10, or Interleukin-11 within 4 weeks prior to receiving the FMT
- Patients who are unable to give informed consent
- Patients who are unable or unwilling to undergo colonoscopy with moderate sedation (>ASA class II)
- Patients who have previously undergone FMT Patients who have a confirmed malignancy or cancer
Show all 16Show fewer
- Patients who are immunocompromised
- Treatment within last 8 weeks with infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab, natalizumab, vedolizumab or thalidomide
- Antibiotic use within 2-months of start date
- Participation in a clinical trial in the preceding 30 days or simultaneously during this trial
- Probiotic use within 30 days of start date
- Congenital or acquired immunodeficiencies
- Other comorbidities including:Diabetes mellitus, cancer, systemic lupus, must be able to tolerate conscious sedation with colonoscopy
- Chronic kidney disease as defined by a GFR <60mL/min/1.73m2 44
- History of rheumatic heart disease, endocarditis, or valvular disease due to risk of bacteremia from colonoscopy
- Steroid dose >20mg/day
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
About this study
This is an open-label single-arm pilot study to measure the safety, microbiological and clinical impacts of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) in patients with Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC). The investigators will prospectively enroll 10 PSC patients Stage 1 and 2 who also have concurrent inflammatory bowel disease Donor Stool from one healthy donor will be obtained from OpenBiome. OpenBiome is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization that provides hospitals with screened, filtered, and frozen material ready for clinical use
Read the detailed description
Background and Significance:
Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a progressive, chronic cholestatic liver disease characterized by inflammatory and fibrotic destruction of the intrahepatic and/or extrahepatic bile ducts. PSC will progress to biliary cirrhosis, portal hypertension and liver failure (1) . It is a common indication for liver transplantation. In up to 90% of patients, ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease will also be present (2) . Medications used for the treatment of ulcerative colitis such as sulfasalazine, corticosteroids and azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine have not been effective in reducing inflammation or bringing about remission in PSC (3) . A number of studies of other anti-inflammatory agents have failed to demonstrate any benefit. In standard dosing, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) may be of benefit in delaying the progression of disease, although a recent study showed that high dose UDCA was not only ineffective, it may also be harmful (4) . Currently there is no medical therapy that has been shown to be effective in PSC and no therapy has won FDA approval for this indication.
It has been postulated that bacterial components may stimulate an aberrant immune response resulting in the perpetuation of the biliary inflammation seen in PSC. Bacteria gain access to the liver and biliary tree through translocation across an abnormal and inflamed intestinal mucosa into the portal venous system (5) . Studies have shown an increased risk of portal venous bacteremia in patients with PSC. Animal models have demonstrated that enteric dysbiosis can lead to hepatobiliary inflammation with various features of PSC (6) . The pathways through which bacteria might then induce the pathology characteristic of PSC are speculative.
Bacteria might cause direct injury through colonization, though studies have not identified any particular pathogen or a consistent set of bacteria. Another potential pathway may be that a certain set of bacteria generate secondary bile acids, such as deoxycholic acid and lithocholic acid, which are injurious to the biliary system (7) . We recently found an altered serum bile acid composition in patients with PSC compared to non-cholestatic controls. Treatment with UDCA in PSC patients decreases the concentration of the toxic primary bile acid chenodeoxycholic acid but also increased the toxic secondary bile acid lithocholic acid (Abstract DDW 2014). Alteration of the gut microbiota may minimize or eliminate this injury.
There is limited experience in the use of antibiotics in treating PSC. Metronidazole has been shown to result in improvement in liver function tests (8) . Oral vancomycin has also been advanced as a potentially promising therapy (9) . An initial report of three pediatric patients and a subsequent small, uncontrolled series of oral vancomycin in 14 children showed improvement in liver tests and symptoms (10, 11) . We recently completed a study of oral vancomycin was given to 10 adults with PSC found mild improvement in serum alkaline phosphatase levels (Abstract DDW 2011).
Fecal Biotherapy (FBT) also known as fecal transplantation or fecal microbiota transplant-involves the transfer of a donor's fecal flora (bacteria) to a recipient's colon. It has become widely accepted as the standard of care for recurrent Clostridium difficile 3 infection, with a cumulative cure rate of >90% and minimal adverse events (12) . In C. diff infection, prior exposure to antibiotics diminishes the normal colonic flora, allowing C. diff organism to proliferate and release toxin (13) . This bacterial environment is similar to the major shifts in microbial diversity seen in patients with IBD. Interestingly, when patients with IBD receive FBT for C. diff. infections, their outcomes are excellent, reinforcing the notion that the enteric flora have a strong influence in the enteric immune system (14) . We currently have a robust FMT clinical program for recurrent and refractory c.difficle infections with a cure rate > 90%. We have also recently participated in an open label clinical trial for the use of FMT in crohn's disease.
We hypothesize that for patients with PSC, fecal microbiota transplantation will correct a dysbiosis that has led to hepatobiliary inflammation leading to improvement in LFTs and slow progression to cirrhosis.
Specific Aims:
Specific Aim 1: Determine the impact of fecal microbiota transplantation on the intestinal microbiome of patients with primary sclerosis cholangitis with and without inflammatory bowel disease via 16s ribosomal RNA sequencing comparing delivery modalities (colonoscopy and capsules).
Hypothesis: Fecal microbiota transplantation will result in a sustained repopulation of the patient's microbiome that corresponds to the bacteria from the donor stool.
Specific Aim 2: Assess for clinical response in patients with PSC receiving FMT comparing delivery modalities (colonoscopy and capsules).
Hypothesis: Fecal microbiota transplantation will lead to a 50% reduction in liver biochemistries in patients with PSC.
Specific Aim 3: Assess bile salt metabolomics as a therapeutic biomarker for clinical response to fecal microbiota transplantation.
Hypothesis: A decrease in the production of toxic secondary bile acids (lithocholic and deoxycholic acid) will correlate with clinical response to fecal microbiota therapy
Primary Physiological Endpoint:
12
- Recipient's fecal microbial diversity at 12 weeks after FMT, when compared to baseline using 16s ribosomal RNA.
Primary Clinical Endpoint
- The primary study end point is them mean change serum liver biochemistries after 3 months of treatment as compared with baseline. Treatment success was defined as an improvement in serum alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) by 50 % or greater.
Secondary Endpoints Metabolomics: Bile salt profiles of the samples and associated community structure of the fecal microbiome will be assessed as a measure of the interplay between host and gut microbiota. Stool and Serum will be analyzed using the metabolomics platform at the Broad Institute, targeting bile acids. Samples will be sent to the Broad Institute where we will use liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS) to measure endogenous bile salts and their metabolite levels in fecal supernatant. Water soluble metabolites will be extracted from feces as described by Saric et al while lipids will be extracted from lypophilized samples using isopropanol. Water soluble metabolites will be measured using ion pairing chromatography and hydrophilic interaction chromatography methods, and lipids and bile acids will be measured using C4 and C18 reversed phase chromatography methods. MultiQuant software (AB SCIEX) will be used for automated peak integration and manual review of peak quality prior to statistical analyses. The GenePattern (Broad Institute) and IPA (Ingenuity Systems) software will be used to analyze and visualize results.
Clinical Endpoints:
- Mean change in Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI) and PBC 40 score between week 0 and week 1, 4, 8, and 12. Percentage of patients in clinical remission (those with an HBI score at week 12 <5)
- Mean change in Mayo Risk Score at week 12 compared to baseline. The Mayo Risk Score (MRS) for PSC is calculated based using the following formula: risk = (0.0295 * (age in years)) + (0.5373 * LN(total bilirubin in mg/dL)) - (0.8389 * (serum albumin in g/dL)) + (0.5380 * LN(AST in IU/L) + (1.2426 * (points for variceal bleeding)) If your Mayo Risk Score is less than or equal to 0 then you are in the "low" risk group. If your Mayo Risk Score is greater than 0 but less than 2 then you are in the "intermediate" risk group. If your Mayo Risk Score is greater than 2 then you are in the "high" risk group.
Safety Endpoints: Number and nature of adverse events at week 1, 4, 8, 12 and 24
- Conditions
- Sclerosing Cholangitis
- Being tested
- Fecal Microbiota Transplantation
- Keywords
- Fecal Transplant, Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis, Fecal Microbiota Transplantation
- Medical subject headings
- Cholangitis, Sclerosing
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Fecal Microbiota TransplantationBiological
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with PSC | Experimental | This is an open label study. All patients enrolled will receive a fecal microbiota transplantation. Receives: Biological: Fecal Microbiota Transplantation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Adverse Event Frequency
Number of patients with reporting adverse events irregardless of severity
Measured: 6 months
Comparison of Alkaline Phosphatase Pre and Post Transplant
The primary clinical study end point is the number of patients that achieve a 50% or more decrease serum alkaline phosphatase
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Microbiome
Number of patients that experienced changes in the microbiome post FMT. Measured as similarity to the donor microbiome post FMT compared to their baseline sample
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Apr 2015 (estimated)
- Study start1 Feb 2016
- Primary completion30 Aug 2017
- Study completion8 May 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Sclerosing CholangitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Brigham and Women's HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Brigham and Women's Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Joshua Korzenik, Brigham and Women's Hospital
- Investigators
- Joshua Korzenik, MD, Principal investigator, Brigham and Women's Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02424175
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2014P002475
- Status last verified
- Aug 2018
- First submitted
- 18 Apr 2015
- Last updated
- 28 Aug 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Aug 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for the Treatment of Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02424175
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2014P002475
- Conditions
- Sclerosing Cholangitis
- Keywords
- Fecal Transplant, Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis, Fecal Microbiota Transplantation
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Brigham and Women's HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 8 May 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Apr 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 21 Aug 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is an open-label single-arm pilot study to measure the safety, microbiological and clinical impacts of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) in patients with Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC). The investigators will prospectively enroll 10 PSC patients Stage 1 and 2 who also have concurrent inflammatory bowel disease Donor Stool from one healthy donor will be obtained from OpenBiome. OpenBiome is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization that provides hospitals with screened, filtered, and frozen material ready for clinical use
Detailed description
Background and Significance:
Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a progressive, chronic cholestatic liver disease characterized by inflammatory and fibrotic destruction of the intrahepatic and/or extrahepatic bile ducts. PSC will progress to biliary cirrhosis, portal hypertension and liver failure (1) . It is a common indication for liver transplantation. In up to 90% of patients, ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease will also be present (2) . Medications used for the treatment of ulcerative colitis such as sulfasalazine, corticosteroids and azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine have not been effective in reducing inflammation or bringing about remission in PSC (3) . A number of studies of other anti-inflammatory agents have failed to demonstrate any benefit. In standard dosing, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) may be of benefit in delaying the progression of disease, although a recent study showed that high dose UDCA was not only ineffective, it may also be harmful (4) . Currently there is no medical therapy that has been shown to be effective in PSC and no therapy has won FDA approval for this indication.
It has been postulated that bacterial components may stimulate an aberrant immune response resulting in the perpetuation of the biliary inflammation seen in PSC. Bacteria gain access to the liver and biliary tree through translocation across an abnormal and inflamed intestinal mucosa into the portal venous system (5) . Studies have shown an increased risk of portal venous bacteremia in patients with PSC. Animal models have demonstrated that enteric dysbiosis can lead to hepatobiliary inflammation with various features of PSC (6) . The pathways through which bacteria might then induce the pathology characteristic of PSC are speculative.
Bacteria might cause direct injury through colonization, though studies have not identified any particular pathogen or a consistent set of bacteria. Another potential pathway may be that a certain set of bacteria generate secondary bile acids, such as deoxycholic acid and lithocholic acid, which are injurious to the biliary system (7) . We recently found an altered serum bile acid composition in patients with PSC compared to non-cholestatic controls. Treatment with UDCA in PSC patients decreases the concentration of the toxic primary bile acid chenodeoxycholic acid but also increased the toxic secondary bile acid lithocholic acid (Abstract DDW 2014). Alteration of the gut microbiota may minimize or eliminate this injury.
There is limited experience in the use of antibiotics in treating PSC. Metronidazole has been shown to result in improvement in liver function tests (8) . Oral vancomycin has also been advanced as a potentially promising therapy (9) . An initial report of three pediatric patients and a subsequent small, uncontrolled series of oral vancomycin in 14 children showed improvement in liver tests and symptoms (10, 11) . We recently completed a study of oral vancomycin was given to 10 adults with PSC found mild improvement in serum alkaline phosphatase levels (Abstract DDW 2011).
Fecal Biotherapy (FBT) also known as fecal transplantation or fecal microbiota transplant-involves the transfer of a donor's fecal flora (bacteria) to a recipient's colon. It has become widely accepted as the standard of care for recurrent Clostridium difficile 3 infection, with a cumulative cure rate of >90% and minimal adverse events (12) . In C. diff infection, prior exposure to antibiotics diminishes the normal colonic flora, allowing C. diff organism to proliferate and release toxin (13) . This bacterial environment is similar to the major shifts in microbial diversity seen in patients with IBD. Interestingly, when patients with IBD receive FBT for C. diff. infections, their outcomes are excellent, reinforcing the notion that the enteric flora have a strong influence in the enteric immune system (14) . We currently have a robust FMT clinical program for recurrent and refractory c.difficle infections with a cure rate > 90%. We have also recently participated in an open label clinical trial for the use of FMT in crohn's disease.
We hypothesize that for patients with PSC, fecal microbiota transplantation will correct a dysbiosis that has led to hepatobiliary inflammation leading to improvement in LFTs and slow progression to cirrhosis.
Specific Aims:
Specific Aim 1: Determine the impact of fecal microbiota transplantation on the intestinal microbiome of patients with primary sclerosis cholangitis with and without inflammatory bowel disease via 16s ribosomal RNA sequencing comparing delivery modalities (colonoscopy and capsules).
Hypothesis: Fecal microbiota transplantation will result in a sustained repopulation of the patient's microbiome that corresponds to the bacteria from the donor stool.
Specific Aim 2: Assess for clinical response in patients with PSC receiving FMT comparing delivery modalities (colonoscopy and capsules).
Hypothesis: Fecal microbiota transplantation will lead to a 50% reduction in liver biochemistries in patients with PSC.
Specific Aim 3: Assess bile salt metabolomics as a therapeutic biomarker for clinical response to fecal microbiota transplantation.
Hypothesis: A decrease in the production of toxic secondary bile acids (lithocholic and deoxycholic acid) will correlate with clinical response to fecal microbiota therapy
Primary Physiological Endpoint:
12
- Recipient's fecal microbial diversity at 12 weeks after FMT, when compared to baseline using 16s ribosomal RNA.
Primary Clinical Endpoint
- The primary study end point is them mean change serum liver biochemistries after 3 months of treatment as compared with baseline. Treatment success was defined as an improvement in serum alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) by 50 % or greater.
Secondary Endpoints Metabolomics: Bile salt profiles of the samples and associated community structure of the fecal microbiome will be assessed as a measure of the interplay between host and gut microbiota. Stool and Serum will be analyzed using the metabolomics platform at the Broad Institute, targeting bile acids. Samples will be sent to the Broad Institute where we will use liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS) to measure endogenous bile salts and their metabolite levels in fecal supernatant. Water soluble metabolites will be extracted from feces as described by Saric et al while lipids will be extracted from lypophilized samples using isopropanol. Water soluble metabolites will be measured using ion pairing chromatography and hydrophilic interaction chromatography methods, and lipids and bile acids will be measured using C4 and C18 reversed phase chromatography methods. MultiQuant software (AB SCIEX) will be used for automated peak integration and manual review of peak quality prior to statistical analyses. The GenePattern (Broad Institute) and IPA (Ingenuity Systems) software will be used to analyze and visualize results.
Clinical Endpoints:
- Mean change in Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI) and PBC 40 score between week 0 and week 1, 4, 8, and 12. Percentage of patients in clinical remission (those with an HBI score at week 12 <5)
- Mean change in Mayo Risk Score at week 12 compared to baseline. The Mayo Risk Score (MRS) for PSC is calculated based using the following formula: risk = (0.0295 * (age in years)) + (0.5373 * LN(total bilirubin in mg/dL)) - (0.8389 * (serum albumin in g/dL)) + (0.5380 * LN(AST in IU/L) + (1.2426 * (points for variceal bleeding)) If your Mayo Risk Score is less than or equal to 0 then you are in the "low" risk group. If your Mayo Risk Score is greater than 0 but less than 2 then you are in the "intermediate" risk group. If your Mayo Risk Score is greater than 2 then you are in the "high" risk group.
Safety Endpoints: Number and nature of adverse events at week 1, 4, 8, 12 and 24
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with PSC | Experimental | Biological: Fecal Microbiota TransplantationThis is an open label study. All patients enrolled will receive a fecal microbiota transplantation. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Age 18 or older
- Confirmed diagnosis of PSC (with a concurrent diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease) characterized by a cholestatic liver condition of greater than 6 months duration with confirmatory cholangiographic findings, as well as an elevation of the serum alkaline phosphatase of greater than 1.5 times the upper limit of normal.
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Decompensated liver disease
- Patients who were pregnant or breastfeeding
- Use of concomitant immune modulators including methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, cyclosporine, thalidomide, Interleukin-10, or Interleukin-11 within 4 weeks prior to receiving the FMT
- Patients who are unable to give informed consent
- Patients who are unable or unwilling to undergo colonoscopy with moderate sedation (>ASA class II)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Fecal Microbiota Transplantation | Biological | Patients with PSC |
Primary outcome
Adverse Event Frequency
Time frame: 6 months
Number of patients with reporting adverse events irregardless of severity
Comparison of Alkaline Phosphatase Pre and Post Transplant
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
The primary clinical study end point is the number of patients that achieve a 50% or more decrease serum alkaline phosphatase
1 secondary outcome
Microbiome
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Aug 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Sclerosing Cholangitis
RecruitingObservational study
Unraveling the Mechanisms Underlying Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis Through a Multidisciplinary, Integrative Research Approach
Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
FEAST and HOPE: Redox PSC Pilot Study
Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Assess How Well and Safely Elafibranor Works in Adult Participants With Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis
Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study to Assess Safety and Effectiveness of Elafibranor in Adult Participants With Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis.
Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of an Investigational Drug Named Volixibat in Patients With Itching Caused by Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC)
Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Joshua Korzenik, MD principal investigator
Brigham and Women's Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in people with Sclerosing Cholangitis, run by Brigham and Women's Hospital at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Aug 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Adverse Event Frequency (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Aug 2019.