AzTrials
AzTrials

Brain InjuriesNCT02418169

Association Between Craniofacial Fractures and Brain Injuries: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Considerations

An observational study of Brain Injuries and Skull Fractures, run by Turku University Hospital.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study evaluates the association between traumatic brain injuries and craniofacial or/and skull fractures. Purpose is to find out the amount of missed diagnoses and improve primary diagnostics of trauma patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Brain Injuries, Skull Fractures
How many people
1,000 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
May 2015to Dec 2019
How long will I take part?
1 Year
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with severe traumatic brain injury, patients with craniofacial fractures

Who may be able to join

  • Severe traumatic brain injury, GCS 8 or less and/or Craniofacial fracture

Who cannot join

  • Died before admitted to hospital

About this study

This study evaluates the association between traumatic brain injuries and craniofacial or/and skull fractures. Purpose is to find out the amount of missed diagnoses and improve primary diagnostics of trauma patients.

Read the detailed description

A part of mild TBIs remains undiagnosed. Therefore the primary diagnostics of trauma patients needs to be improved. According to some studies, a part of trauma patients' concomitant injuries weren't diagnosed in the emergency room (ER) but were diagnosed later in the clinics. In addition to difficult diagnostics the treatment of these patients demands close co- operation between many specialities.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between TBIs and facial fractures. The real amount of facial fractures in patients with severe TBI and the clinical significance of these fractures are evaluated. Also the number of patients with facial fractures and a concomitant TBI is evaluated. The aim is to find out the amount of patients with missed diagnoses. Other aims of are to determine the effect of the type or location of a facial fracture on the in- cidence and severity of TBI. With the help of the results it would be possible to improve the comprehensive diagnostics and early treatment of patients with a facial fracture or a TBI.

The retrospective and prospective data on patients with TBI and/or facial fracture are collect- ed at Turku University Hospital. The comparison of the two groups will give information on the amount of patients with missed diagnosis of TBI or facial fracture. The results can be utilised in planning strategy for comprehensive diagnostics and treatment of the patients. In the research group the investigators have specialists in the fields of oral and maxillofacial surgery, neurol- ogy and otorhinolaryngology.

Medical subject headings
Brain Injuries, Skull Fractures

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02418169
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
retrospective, severe traumatic brain injuryAll patients in 2010-2014 with severe traumatic brain injury admitted to Turku University Central Hospital (TUCH)
retrospective, craniofacial fractureAll patients in 2010-2014 with craniofacial fracture admitted to TUCH.
prospective, severe traumatic brain injuryAll patients in 2015-2017 with severe traumatic brain injury admitted to Turku University Central Hospital (TUCH)
prospective, craniofacial fractureAll patients in 2015-2017 with craniofacial fracture admitted to TUCH.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. survival

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Apr 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2015
  3. Primary completionDec 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
1,000 participants (estimated)
Target duration
1 Year
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02418169
Sponsor's protocol ID
T74/2015
Status last verified
Apr 2015
First submitted
13 Apr 2015
Last updated
16 Apr 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Brain Injuries and Skull Fractures, run by Turku University Hospital.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

survival (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Apr 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in