AzTrials
AzTrials

Colitis, UlcerativePhase 3UNIFINCT02407236

A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Ustekinumab Induction and Maintenance Therapy in Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis

A Phase 3 study testing Ustekinumab IV and Ustekinumab SC in people with Colitis, Ulcerative and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 247 sites in 23 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab as intravenous (IV: into the vein) infusion in induction study in participants with moderately to severely active Ulcerative Colitis (UC) and as subcutaneous (SC) administration in maintenance study in participants with moderately to… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Ustekinumab IV and Ustekinumab SC
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
961 participants
Where
247 sitesin 23 countries
Study dates
10 Jul 2015to 30 Nov 2021
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Has a clinical diagnosis of Ulcerative Colitis (UC) at least 3 months before Screening
  • Has moderately to severely active UC, defined as a Baseline (Week 0) Mayo score of 6 to 12, including a Screening endoscopy subscore of the Mayo score greater than or equal to (>=) 2 as determined by a central reading of the video endoscopy
  • Have failed biologic therapy, that is, have received treatment with 1 or more tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists or vedolizumab at a dose approved for the treatment of UC, and have a documented history of failure to respond to or tolerate such treatment; OR Be naïve to biologic therapy (TNF antagonists or vedolizumab) or have received biologic therapy but have not demonstrated a history of failure to respond to, or tolerate, a biologic therapy and have a prior or current UC medication history that includes at least 1 of the following: a. Inadequate response to or failure to tolerate current treatment with oral corticosteroids or immunomodulators (6-mercaptopurine [6-MP] or azathioprine [AZA]) OR b. History of failure to respond to, or tolerate, at least 1 of the following therapies: oral or IV corticosteroids or immunomodulators (6-MP or AZA) OR c. History of corticosteroid dependence (that is, an inability to successfully taper corticosteroids without a return of the symptoms of UC)
  • Before the first administration of study agent, the following conditions must be met: vedolizumab must have been discontinued for at least 4 months and anti-tumor necrosis factors (TNFs) for at least 8 weeks

Who cannot join

  • Has severe extensive colitis and is at imminent risk of colectomy
  • Has UC limited to the rectum only or to < 20 centimeters (cm) of the colon
  • Presence of a stoma or history of a fistula
  • Participants with history of extensive colonic resection (for example, less than 30 cm of colon remaining) that would prevent adequate evaluation of the effect of study agent on clinical disease activity
  • Participants with history of colonic mucosal dysplasia. Participants will not be excluded from the study because of a pathology finding of "indefinite dysplasia with reactive atypia''

Trial locations and contacts

247 sites in 23 countries.

247 sites in 23 countries

United States68 sites
  • Study site

    Ann Arbor, Michigan

  • Study site

    Atlanta, Georgia

  • Study site

    Birmingham, Alabama

  • Study site

    Boston, Massachusetts

  • Study site

    Brooklyn, New York

  • Study site

    Chesapeake, Virginia

  • Study site

    Chesterfield, Michigan

  • Study site

    Chicago, Illinois

  • Study site

    Cincinnati, Ohio

  • Study site

    Columbia, Maryland

  • Study site

    Crestview Hills, Kentucky

  • Study site

    Dallas, Texas

  • Study site

    Decatur, Georgia

  • Study site

    Doylestown, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Evanston, Illinois

  • Study site

    Fairfax, Virginia

  • Study site

    Farmington, Connecticut

  • Study site

    Gainesville, Florida

  • Study site

    Germantown, Tennessee

  • Study site

    Hershey, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Houma, Louisiana

  • Study site

    Houston, Texas

  • Study site

    Idaho Falls, Idaho

  • Study site

    Indianapolis, Indiana

  • Study site

    Irving, Texas

  • Study site

    Jackson, Mississippi

  • Study site

    La Mirada, California

  • Study site

    Largo, Florida

  • Study site

    Lexington, Kentucky

  • Study site

    Lone Tree, Colorado

  • Study site

    Los Angeles, California

  • Study site

    Louisville, Kentucky

  • Study site

    Macon, Georgia

  • Study site

    Marlton, New Jersey

  • Study site

    Mentor, Ohio

  • Study site

    Miami, Florida

  • Study site

    Mineola, New York

  • Study site

    Morristown, New Jersey

  • Study site

    Nashville, Tennessee

  • Study site

    New York, New York

  • Study site

    Newport Beach, California

  • Study site

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Port Orange, Florida

  • Study site

    Portland, Oregon

  • Study site

    Poughkeepsie, New York

  • Study site

    Pratt, Kansas

  • Study site

    Roanoke, Virginia

  • Study site

    Rochester, Minnesota

  • Study site

    Rochester, New York

  • Study site

    Salt Lake City, Utah

  • Study site

    San Antonio, Texas

  • Study site

    Sayre, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Seattle, Washington

  • Study site

    Shreveport, Louisiana

  • Study site

    Southlake, Texas

  • Study site

    Suwanee, Georgia

  • Study site

    Tampa, Florida

  • Study site

    The Bronx, New York

  • Study site

    Torrance, California

  • Study site

    Troy, Michigan

  • Study site

    Tyler, Texas

  • Study site

    Urbana, Illinois

  • Study site

    Vallejo, California

  • Study site

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia

  • Study site

    West Jordan, Utah

  • Study site

    Winter Park, Florida

  • Study site

    Ypsilanti, Michigan

  • Study site

    Zephyrhills, Florida

Other trials in United States

Japan42 sites
  • Study site

    Ageo-shi

  • Study site

    Asahikawa

  • Study site

    Bunkyō City

  • Study site

    Chiba

  • Study site

    Chikushinoshi

  • Study site

    Fujiidera

  • Study site

    Fukuoka-ken

  • Study site

    Higashi-Ibaraki

  • Study site

    Hirosaki

  • Study site

    Hiroshima

  • Study site

    Isesaki

  • Study site

    Izumo

  • Study site

    Kagoshima

  • Study site

    Kahoku

  • Study site

    Kobe

  • Study site

    Kochi

  • Study site

    Kurume

  • Study site

    Kyoto

  • Study site

    Midori-ku

  • Study site

    Nagasaki

  • Study site

    Nara

  • Study site

    Nishinomiya

  • Study site

    Numakunai

  • Study site

    Ōita

  • Study site

    Osaka

  • Study site

    Saga

  • Study site

    Saga-ken

  • Study site

    Saitama

  • Study site

    Sakura

  • Study site

    Sapporo

  • Study site

    Sendai

  • Study site

    Shizuoka

  • Study site

    Sunto-gun

  • Study site

    Takamatsu

  • Study site

    Tokorozawa

  • Study site

    Tokyo

  • Study site

    Toyama

  • Study site

    Toyota

  • Study site

    Tsu

  • Study site

    Tsuchiura

  • Study site

    Wakayama

  • Study site

    Yamanashi

Other trials in Japan

Ukraine13 sites
  • Study site

    Chernivtsi

  • Study site

    Dnipropetrovsk

  • Study site

    Ivano-Frankivsk

  • Study site

    Kharkiv

  • Study site

    Kiyv

  • Study site

    Kyiv

  • Study site

    Lviv

  • Study site

    Odesa

  • Study site

    Sumy

  • Study site

    Uzhhorod

  • Study site

    Vinnytsia

  • Study site

    Zaporizhzhya

  • Study site

    Zhaporozhia

Other trials in Ukraine

France11 sites
  • Study site

    Amiens

  • Study site

    Bordeaux

  • Study site

    Lille

  • Study site

    Lyon

  • Study site

    Marseille

  • Study site

    Montpellier

  • Study site

    Pierre-Bénite

  • Study site

    Reims

  • Study site

    Rennes

  • Study site

    Saint-Etienne

  • Study site

    Toulouse

Other trials in France

Australia10 sites
  • Study site

    Bedford

  • Study site

    Clayton

  • Study site

    Concord

  • Study site

    Fitzroy

  • Study site

    Five Dock

  • Study site

    Garran

  • Study site

    Heidelberg

  • Study site

    Liverpool

  • Study site

    Melbourne

  • Study site

    South Brisbane

Other trials in Australia

Germany10 sites
  • Study site

    Berlin

  • Study site

    Essen

  • Study site

    Freiburg im Breisgau

  • Study site

    Hanover

  • Study site

    Kiel

  • Study site

    Leipzig

  • Study site

    Lüneburg

  • Study site

    Mannheim

  • Study site

    Minden

  • Study site

    Münster

Other trials in Germany

Hungary10 sites
  • Study site

    Balatonfüred

  • Study site

    Békéscsaba

  • Study site

    Budapest

  • Study site

    Debrecen

  • Study site

    Miskolc

  • Study site

    Mosonmagyaróvár

  • Study site

    Székesfehérvár

  • Study site

    Szekszárd

  • Study site

    Szombathely

  • Study site

    Vác

Other trials in Hungary

Russia10 sites
  • Study site

    Irkutsk

  • Study site

    Kazan'

  • Study site

    Moscow

  • Study site

    Moscva

  • Study site

    Novosibirsk

  • Study site

    Rostov-on-Don

  • Study site

    Ryazan

  • Study site

    Saint Petersburg

  • Study site

    Stavropol

  • Study site

    Ufa

Other trials in Russia

United Kingdom10 sites
  • Study site

    Birmingham

  • Study site

    Cambridge

  • Study site

    Coventry

  • Study site

    Doncaster

  • Study site

    Edinburgh

  • Study site

    Liverpool

  • Study site

    London

  • Study site

    Salford

  • Study site

    Southampton

  • Study site

    Sutton in Ashfield

Other trials in United Kingdom

Israel9 sites
  • Study site

    Beersheba

  • Study site

    Haifa

  • Study site

    Holon

  • Study site

    Jerusalem

  • Study site

    Kfar Saba

  • Study site

    Nahariya

  • Study site

    Petach Tikvah

  • Study site

    Tel Aviv

  • Study site

    Tel HaShomer

Other trials in Israel

Poland8 sites
  • Study site

    Gdansk

  • Study site

    Krakow

  • Study site

    Lodz

  • Study site

    Puławy

  • Study site

    Sopot

  • Study site

    Szczecin

  • Study site

    Warsaw

  • Study site

    Wroclaw

Other trials in Poland

Canada7 sites
  • Study site

    Brandon, Manitoba

  • Study site

    Greater Sudbury, Ontario

  • Study site

    London, Ontario

  • Study site

    Montreal, Quebec

  • Study site

    Vancouver, British Columbia

  • Study site

    Victoria, British Columbia

  • Study site

    Winnipeg, Manitoba

Other trials in Canada

Belgium6 sites
  • Study site

    Antwerp

  • Study site

    Ghent

  • Study site

    Kortrijk

  • Study site

    Leuven

  • Study site

    Liège

  • Study site

    Roeselaere

Other trials in Belgium

Bulgaria5 sites
  • Study site

    Pleven

  • Study site

    Rousse

  • Study site

    Sevlievo

  • Study site

    Sofia

  • Study site

    Varna

Other trials in Bulgaria

New Zealand5 sites
  • Study site

    Auckland

  • Study site

    Christchurch

  • Study site

    Dunedin

  • Study site

    Lower Hutt

  • Study site

    Milford

Other trials in New Zealand

Romania4 sites
  • Study site

    Bucharest

  • Study site

    Oradea

  • Study site

    Romania

  • Study site

    Timișoara

Other trials in Romania

Serbia4 sites
  • Study site

    Belgrade

  • Study site

    Kragujevac

  • Study site

    Niš

  • Study site

    Vojvodina

Other trials in Serbia

South Korea4 sites
  • Study site

    Daegu

  • Study site

    Guri-si

  • Study site

    Seoul

  • Study site

    Suwon

Other trials in South Korea

Czechia3 sites
  • Study site

    Hradec Králové

  • Study site

    Pilsen

  • Study site

    Prague

Other trials in Czechia

Austria2 sites
  • Study site

    Salzburg

  • Study site

    Vienna

Other trials in Austria

Denmark2 sites
  • Study site

    Aarhus

  • Study site

    Odense

Other trials in Denmark

Netherlands2 sites
  • Study site

    Amsterdam

  • Study site

    Maastricht

Other trials in Netherlands

Slovakia2 sites
  • Study site

    Bratislava

  • Study site

    Prešov

Other trials in Slovakia

About this study

Official title: A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multicenter Protocol to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Ustekinumab Induction and Maintenance Therapy in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab as intravenous (IV: into the vein) infusion in induction study in participants with moderately to severely active Ulcerative Colitis (UC) and as subcutaneous (SC) administration in maintenance study in participants with moderately to severely active Ulcerative Colitis (UC) who have demonstrated a clinical response to Induction treatment with IV ustekinumab.

Read the detailed description

This is a Phase 3, randomized (assignment of study drug by chance), double-blind (neither the participant or study staff will know the identity of study drugs), placebo-controlled (placebo is an inactive substance that is compared with a drug to test whether the drug has a real effect in a clinical trial), parallel-group (a medical research study comparing the response in 2 or more groups of participants receiving different interventions), multi-center (more than one clinical site will work on a medical research study), protocol of ustekinumab. The protocol will consist of 2 studies: an Induction study and a Maintenance study with unique endpoints. Screening period will be up to 8 Weeks. Induction study will be at least 8 weeks duration for each participant. Participant with clinical response in the Induction study will be eligible for the Maintenance study. The Maintenance study will be 44 weeks duration. After completion of the maintenance study, a long term extension will follow eligible participants for an additional 3 years. Clinical remission will be evaluated at Week 8 in the Induction study. Clinical remission among ustekinumab Induction responders will be evaluated at week 44 in the Maintenance study. Participants' safety will be monitored throughout.

Being tested
Placebo IV, Placebo SC, Ustekinumab IV, Ustekinumab SC
Keywords
Ustekinumab, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD), Colitis, Ulcerative
Medical subject headings
Colitis, Ulcerative, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Placebo IVDrug

    Placebo will be administered as intravenous infusion.

  • Placebo SCDrug

    Placebo will be administered Subcutaneously.

  • Ustekinumab IVDrug

    Ustekinumab will be administered as intravenous infusion at Week 0 or Week 8 in Induction Study.

  • Ustekinumab SCDrug

    Ustekinumab will be administered as subcutaneously.

Study groups in NCT02407236
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Induction Study - Placebo Intravenous (IV)Placebo comparatorParticipants will be randomized to receive single dose of placebo as Intravenous (IV: into the vein) infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 will be eligible to enter the Maintenance study, but will not be randomized.
Receives: Drug: Placebo IV
Induction Study - Ustekinumab 130 milligram (mg) IVExperimentalParticipants will be randomized to receive single dose of ustekinumab 130 mg as IV infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 will be eligible to enter the Maintenance study and will be randomized.
Receives: Drug: Ustekinumab IV
Induction Study - Ustekinumab 6 mg/kg IVExperimentalParticipants will be randomized to receive ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg of body weight, as intravenous infusion at Week 0. Participants with clinical response at Week 8 will be eligible to enter the Maintenance study and will be randomized.
Receives: Drug: Ustekinumab IV
Induction Study- Placebo- Nonresponsders at Week 8OtherParticipants without clinical response to placebo at Week 8 will receive a single IV infusion of ustekinumab approximating 6mg/kg along with matching subcutaneous (SC) placebo (to maintain the blind). Participants in clinical response at Week 16 will be eligible to enter Maintenance study and will be randomized.
Receives: Drug: Placebo SC; Drug: Ustekinumab IV
Induction study-Ustekinumab Nonresponders at Week 8OtherParticipants without clinical response to ustekinumab (130 mg or 6 mg/kg [IV]) at Week 8 will receive a single dose of ustekinumab 90 mg subcutaneously along with matching placebo intravenously (to maintain the blind). Participants in clinical response at Week 16 (that is, delayed responders) will be eligible to enter Maintenance study, but will not be randomized.
Receives: Drug: Placebo IV; Drug: Ustekinumab SC
Maintenance Study - Placebo Subcutaneous (SC)Placebo comparatorParticipants in clinical response (at Week 8 or Week 16) to Induction treatment with single IV infusion of Ustekinumab will be randomized to receive placebo subcutaneously, beginning Week 0 of Maintenance study through Week 44.
Receives: Drug: Placebo SC
Maintenance Study - Ustekinumab 90mg SC every 12 weeksExperimentalParticipants in clinical response (at Week 8 or Week 16) to Induction treatment with single IV infusion of Ustekinumab will be randomized to receive ustekinumab 90 mg subcutaneously every 12 weeks, beginning Week 0 of Maintenance study through Week 44.
Receives: Drug: Ustekinumab SC
Maintenance Study - Ustekinumab 90mg SC every 8 weeks (q8w)ExperimentalParticipants in clinical response (at Week 8 or Week 16) to Induction treatment with single IV infusion of Ustekinumab will be randomized to receive ustekinumab 90 mg subcutaneously every 8 weeks, beginning Week 0 of Maintenance study through Week 44.
Receives: Drug: Ustekinumab SC
Maintenance Study - Placebo IV - Responder - Placebo SCOtherParticipants in clinical response to Induction treatment with IV Placebo will receive placebo subcutaneously, beginning Week 0 of Maintenance study through Week 44. Participants are not randomized.
Receives: Drug: Placebo SC
Maintenance Study-Delayed Responder-Ustekinumab 90mg SC q8wOtherParticipants without clinical response to induction treatment ustekinumab (130 mg or 6 mg/kg [IV]) at Week 8 but in clinical response at Week 16 after receiving Induction Ustekinumab at week 8 (delayed responders) will receive ustekinumab 90 mg subcutaneously every 8 weeks, beginning Week 0 of Maintenance study through Week 44. Participants are not randomized.
Receives: Drug: Ustekinumab SC

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Induction Study - Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 8 (As Per Global Definition)

    As per global definition, clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score less than or equal to (<=)2 points, with no individual subscore greater than (>)1. The Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding [RB], endoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment [PGA]), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score was calculated as the sum of 4 subscores and values range from 0 to 12 scores, where 3 to 5 = mild; 6 to 10 = moderate; and 11 to 12 = severe; higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant ulcerative colitis (UC) medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 or who had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 8 were considered not to be in clinical remission. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.

    Measured: Week 8

  2. Induction Study - Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 8 (As Per US Definition)

    As per US definition, clinical remission was defined as absolute stool number <=3, a Mayo rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (no blood seen), and a Mayo endoscopy subscore of 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease [erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]) without the physician's global assessment. Absolute stool number is average of daily stool number over the three days. The Mayo rectal bleeding and endoscopy findings subscores were rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 or who were missing all 3 of the Mayo components pertaining to this outcome measure (OM) (absolute stool number, rectal bleeding subscore, and Mayo endoscopy subscore) at Week 8 were considered not to be in clinical remission. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of the video of the endoscopy was used.

    Measured: Week 8

  3. Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 44 (As Per Global Definition)

    As per global definition, clinical remission was defined as a Mayo score <=2 points, with no individual subscore >1. The Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score was calculated as the sum of 4 subscores and values range from 0 to 12 scores, where 3 to 5 = mild; 6 to 10 = moderate; and 11 to 12 = severe; higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 or who had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 44 were considered not to be in clinical remission. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of the video of the endoscopy was used.

    Measured: Week 44

  4. Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 44 (as Per US Definition)

    Per US definition, clinical remission: absolute stool number <=3, a Mayo rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (no blood seen), and a Mayo endoscopy subscore of 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease [erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]), without the physician's global assessment. Absolute stool number is average of daily stool number over the three days. The Mayo rectal bleeding and endoscopy findings subscores were rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Participants who had prohibited change in UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ due to AE of worsening of UC prior to Week 44 and who were missing all 3 of Mayo components pertaining to this OM (absolute stool number, rectal bleeding subscore, and Mayo endoscopy subscore) at Week 44 were considered not to be in clinical remission. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.

    Measured: Week 44

Secondary outcomes (71)
  1. Induction Study: Number of Participants With Endoscopic Healing at Week 8

    Endoscopic healing is improvement in the endoscopic appearance of the mucosa. It is defined as Mayo endoscopic subscore = 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease [erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]). Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 or who had a missing endoscopy score at Week 8 were considered not to have endoscopic healing. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.

    Measured: Week 8

  2. Induction Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 8

    Clinical response was defined as a decrease from induction baseline in the Mayo score by >=30 percent (%) and >= 3 points, with either a decrease from baseline in the rectal bleeding subscore >=1 or a rectal bleeding subscore of 0 or 1. The Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score was calculated as the sum of 4 subscores and values range from 0 to 12 scores, where 3 to 5 = mild; 6 to 10 = moderate; and 11 to 12 = severe; higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 or who had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 8 were considered not to be in clinical response. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.

    Measured: Week 8

  3. Induction Study - Change From Baseline in Total Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score at Week 8

    The IBDQ is 32-item questionnaire for participants with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) used to evaluate disease-specific health-related quality of life. IBDQ consists of 32 items, each item score ranged from 1 (worst possible response) to 7 (best possible response). The 32 items were grouped into 4 domains: bowel function, emotional status, systemic symptoms and social function. The 4 domains were scored as follows: 10 to 70 (bowel symptoms); 5 to 35 (systemic symptoms); 12 to 84 (emotional function); and 5 to 35 (social function). For each domain, higher score indicated better quality of life. Total score is sum of each item score and ranges from 32 to 224 with higher score indicating better quality of life. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from the time of event onward or participants who had missing IBDQ score at Week 8 had their last value carried forward.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 8

  4. Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Response up to Week 44

    Clinical response: decrease from induction baseline in Mayo score by >= 30% and >= 3 points, with either decrease from induction baseline in rectal bleeding subscore >=1 or rectal bleeding subscore of 0 or 1. Mayo score includes 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, physician's global assessment), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score is sum of 4 subscores and values range from 0 to 12 scores, where 3 to 5= mild; 6 to 10= moderate; 11 to 12= severe; higher scores indicate worsening of disease. Participants who lost clinical response at any time before Week 44, had prohibited change in UC medication, ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 or who had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 44 were considered not to be in clinical response. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.

    Measured: Up to Week 44

  5. Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Endoscopic Healing at Week 44

    Endoscopic healing is improvement in the endoscopic appearance of the mucosa. It was defined as Mayo endoscopic subscore = 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease [erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]). Participants who had prohibited change in UC medication, an ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsening of UC prior to Week 44 or who had missing endoscopy score at Week 44 were considered not to have endoscopic healing. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.

    Measured: Week 44

  6. Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Remission and Not Receiving Concomitant Corticosteroids (Corticosteroid-free Clinical Remission) at Week 44 (As Per Global Definition)

    Per global definition, clinical remission was defined as Mayo score <=2 points, with no individual subscore >1. Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score: sum of 4 subscores and range from 0 to 12, where 3 to 5= mild; 6 to 10= moderate; and 11 to 12= severe; higher scores indicate worsening of disease. Participants who had prohibited change in UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 or had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 44 were considered not to have achieved OM of clinical remission and not receiving corticosteroids at Week 44. Participants who had missing value in corticosteroid use at Week 44 had their last value carried forward. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.

    Measured: Week 44

  7. Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Remission and Not Receiving Concomitant Corticosteroids (Corticosteroid-free Clinical Remission) at Week 44 (As Per US Definition)

    US definition of clinical remission: absolute stool number <=3, rectal bleeding subscore 0 (no blood seen), Mayo endoscopy subscore of 0(normal or inactive disease)/ 1 (mild disease [erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]). Absolute stool number: average of daily stool number over 3 days. Mayo rectal bleeding and endoscopy findings subscores rated: 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Participants with prohibited change in UC medication/ostomy/colectomy/used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 or were missing all 3 of Mayo components related to this OM (absolute stool number, rectal bleeding, and Mayo endoscopy subscore) at Week 44 were considered not in corticosteroid-free clinical remission at Week 44. Participants with missing value in corticosteroid use at Week 44 had last value carried forward. Endoscopy subscore assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.

    Measured: Week 44

  8. Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Remission up to Week 44 Among Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission at Maintenance Study Baseline (As Per Global Definition)

    Global definition of clinical remission: Mayo score <=2 points, with no individual subscore >1. Mayo score includes 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, physician's global assessment), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score: sum of 4 subscores and range from 0 to 12, where 3 to 5= mild; 6 to 10= moderate; and 11 to 12= severe; higher scores indicate worsening of disease. Participants who had prohibited change in UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 or had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 44 were considered not to be in clinical remission. Participants who were not in clinical remission at any time points when endoscopic scores were collected before Week 44 were considered not to be in clinical remission up to Week 44. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.

    Measured: Up to Week 44

  9. Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Remission up to Week 44 Among Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission at Maintenance Study Baseline (As Per US Definition)

    US definition of clinical remission: absolute stool number <=3, Mayo rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (no blood seen), Mayo endoscopy subscore of 0 (normal/ inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease [erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]). Absolute stool number: average of daily stool number over 3 days. Mayo rectal bleeding and endoscopy subscores: 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Participants with prohibited change in UC medication/ostomy/colectomy/used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study drug due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsening of UC before Week 44/ missing all 3 of Mayo components (absolute stool number, rectal bleeding, and Mayo endoscopy subscore) at Week 44 were considered not in clinical remission. Participants not in clinical remission at any time point when endoscopic scores collected before Week 44 considered not in clinical remission up to Week 44. Endoscopy subscore assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.

    Measured: Up to Week 44

  10. Induction Study - Number of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 8

    Mucosal healing is defined as having both endoscopic healing (EH) and histologic healing (HH). Endoscopic healing: an endoscopy subscore of 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 mild disease ([erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]). Histologic healing: neutrophil infiltration in <5% of crypts, no crypt destruction, and no erosions or ulcerations or granulation tissue. Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy before Week 8 or had missing endoscopy score/ were missing any component of histologic healing (that is assessment of neutrophils in crypts, crypt destruction/ erosions/ ulcerations/ granulations) at Week 8 or who had unevaluable biopsy (that is biopsy collected, but could not be assessed due to sample preparation or technical errors) at Week 8 but who did not achieve endoscopic healing, were considered not to have mucosal healing. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.

    Measured: Week 8

  11. Induction Study - Number of Participants in Clinical Remission With a Rectal Bleeding Subscore of 0 at Week 8 (As Per Global Definition)

    As per global definition, clinical remission is defined as Mayo score <=2 points, with no individual subscore >1. The Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score is calculated as sum of 4 subscores and values range from 0 to 12 scores, where 3 to 5 = mild; 6 to 10 = moderate; and 11 to 12 = severe; higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 or who had missing rectal bleeding subscores at Week 8 were considered not to be in clinical remission with a rectal bleeding subscore of 0. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.

    Measured: Week 8

  12. Induction Study - Number of Participants in Symptomatic Remission at Week 8

    Symptomatic remission was defined as a Mayo stool frequency subscore of 0 (normal number of stools) or 1 (1-2 stools more than normal) and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (no blood seen). Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 and/or both stool frequency and rectal bleeding subscores missing at Week 8 were considered not to be in symptomatic remission.

    Measured: Week 8

  13. Induction Study - Number of Participants in With Normal or Inactive Mucosal Disease at Week 8

    Normal or inactive mucosal disease is defined as an endoscopy score of 0. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 or who had a missing endoscopy score at Week 8 were considered not to have normal or inactive mucosal disease. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.

    Measured: Week 8

  14. Induction Study - Change From Baseline in Mayo Score at Week 8

    The Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores and values range from 0 to 12 scores, where 3 to 5 = mild; 6 to 10 = moderate; and 11 to 12 = severe; higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 had their baseline Mayo score carried forward to Week 8 or who had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 8 had their last available individual Mayo subscores carried forward. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 8

  15. Induction Study - Change From Baseline in Partial Mayo Score Through Week 8

    The partial Mayo score, which is sum of 3 subscores of the Mayo score without the endoscopy subscore (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and physician's global assessment subscores; rated as 0 [normal] to 3 [severe]). The partial Mayo score is calculated as the sum of the 3 subscores and values range from 0 to 9; higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants with the partial Mayo score missing at a timepoint had their last available individual partial Mayo subscore carried forward to that timepoint.

    Measured: Baseline through Week 8

  16. Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 8

    The stool frequency subscore of Mayo score is rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Stool frequency scores: 0 =normal number of stools, 1 = 1-2 stools more than normal, 2 = 3-4 stools more than normal, 3 = 5 or more stools more than normal. Higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing Mayo stool frequency subscore at the designated analysis timepoint had the last available value for that subscore carried forward.

    Measured: Up to Week 8

  17. Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 8

    The rectal bleeding subscore of the Mayo Score is rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Rectal bleeding scores: 0 = no blood seen, 1 = streaks of blood with stool less than half the time, 2 = obvious blood with stool most of the time, and 3 = blood alone passed. Higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing Mayo rectal bleeding subscore at the designated analysis timepoint had the last available value for that subscore carried forward.

    Measured: Up to Week 8

  18. Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Endoscopy Findings) at Week 8

    The endoscopy findings subscore of the Mayo score is rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Endoscopy finding scores: 0 = normal or inactive disease, 1 = mild disease (erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability), 2 = moderate disease (marked erythema, absent vascular pattern, friability, erosions), and 3 = Severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration). Higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing Mayo endoscopy subscore at Week 8 had the last available value for that subscore carried forward. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.

    Measured: Week 8

  19. Induction Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 8

    The physician's global assessment subscore of the Mayo score is rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Physician's global assessment scores: 0 = normal, 1 = mild disease, 2 = moderate disease, and 3 = severe disease. Higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing Mayo physician's global assessment subscore at the designated analysis timepoint had the last available value for that subscore carried forward.

    Measured: Up to Week 8

  20. Induction Study - Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 8 by Biologic Failure (BF) Status (As Per Global Definition)

    Global definition of clinical remission: Mayo score<=2 points, with no individual subscore >1. Mayo score included 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, physician's global assessment), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score = sum of 4 subscores and range from 0 to 12, where 3 to 5 = mild; 6 to 10 = moderate; 11 to 12 = severe; higher scores indicate worsening of disease. BF: participants received treatment with 1 or more tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists and/or vedolizumab at dose approved for treatment of UC and did not respond initially or responded initially but lost response or were intolerant of medication. Participants with prohibited change in concomitant UC medication/ ostomy/colectomy before Week 8 or who had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 8 considered not in clinical remission. Endoscopy subscore assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.

    Measured: Week 8

  21. Induction Study - Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 8 by Biologic Failure (BF) Status (As Per US Definition)

    US definition of clinical remission: absolute stool number <=3, a Mayo rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (no blood seen), Mayo endoscopy subscore of (normal/ inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease [erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]), without PGA. Absolute stool number: average of daily stool number over 3 days. Mayo rectal bleeding and endoscopy subscores rated 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). BF: participants received treatment with 1/ more TNF antagonists/ vedolizumab at dose approved for treatment of UC, and did not respond initially or responded initially but lost response/ intolerant of medication. Participants with prohibited change in concomitant UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy before Week 8/ missing all 3 of Mayo components (absolute stool number, rectal bleeding, Mayo endoscopy subscore) at Week 8 considered not in clinical remission. Endoscopy subscore assessed during central review used endoscopy video.

    Measured: Week 8

  22. Induction Study - Number of Participants With Endoscopic Healing at Week 8 by Biologic Failure Status

    Number of participants with endoscopic healing at week 8 by BF status were reported. Endoscopic healing is improvement in the endoscopic appearance of the mucosa. It is defined as Mayo endoscopic subscore = 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease [erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]). BF: Participants received treatment with 1/ more TNF antagonists and/or vedolizumab at dose approved for treatment of UC, and either did not respond initially, responded initially but then lost response/ were intolerant of medication. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 or who had a missing endoscopy score at Week 8 were considered not to have endoscopic healing. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.

    Measured: Week 8

  23. Induction Study - Number of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 8 by Biologic Failure Status

    Clinical response: decrease from induction baseline in Mayo score by >=30% and >= 3 points, with either decrease from baseline in rectal bleeding subscore >=1/ rectal bleeding subscore= 0/1. Mayo score included 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, physician's global assessment), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score =sum of 4 subscores and range from 0 to 12, where 3 to 5 = mild; 6 to 10 = moderate; 11 to 12 = severe; higher scores =worsening of disease. BF: participants received treatment with 1/ more TNF antagonists and/or vedolizumab at dose approved for treatment of UC, and did not respond initially or responded initially but lost response/ were intolerant of medication. Participants with prohibited change in concomitant UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy before Week 8 or who had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 8 were considered not in clinical response. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.

    Measured: Week 8

  24. Induction Study: Number of Participants in Remission Based on Stool Frequency Subscore of 0 or 1, Rectal Bleeding Subscore of 0, and Endoscopy Subscore of 0 or 1 at Week 8 (US Specific)

    Number of participants in remission based on stool frequency subscore of 0 (normal number of stools) or 1 (1-2 stools more than normal), rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (no blood seen), and endoscopy subscore of 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease [erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]) at Week 8 were reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 or who were missing all 3 of the Mayo components related to this OM (stool frequency, rectal bleeding subscore, and Mayo endoscopy subscore) at Week 8 were considered not to be in remission. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.

    Measured: Week 8

  25. Induction Study: Number of Participants in Remission Based on Stool Frequency Subscore of 0, Rectal Bleeding Subscore of 0, and Endoscopy Subscore of 0 or 1 at Week 8 (US Specific)

    Number of participants in remission based on stool frequency subscore of 0 (normal number of stools), rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (no blood seen), and endoscopy subscore of 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease [erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]) at Week 8 were reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 or who were missing all 3 of the Mayo components related to this OM (stool frequency, rectal bleeding subscore, and Mayo endoscopy subscore) at Week 8 were considered not to be in remission. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.

    Measured: Week 8

  26. Induction Study - Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Concentration Through Week 8

    Change from baseline in CRP concentration through Week 8 was reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing CRP value at the designated analysis timepoint had their last value carried forward.

    Measured: Baseline through Week 8

  27. Induction Study - Number of Participants With Normalized CRP (<=3 mg/L) up to Week 8 Among Participants With Abnormal CRP (>3 mg/L) at Baseline

    Number of participants with normalized CRP (<=3 mg/L) up to Week 8 among participants with abnormal CRP (>3 mg/L) at baseline were reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 or who had a missing CRP value at the designated analysis timepoint were considered not to have normalized CRP.

    Measured: Up to Week 8

  28. Induction Study - Change From Baseline in Fecal Lactoferrin Concentration Through Week 8

    Change from baseline in fecal lactoferrin concentration through Week 8 was reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing fecal lactoferrin value at the designated analysis timepoint had their last value carried forward.

    Measured: Baseline through Week 8

  29. Induction Study - Number of Participants With Normalized Fecal Lactoferrin (<=7.24 mcg/g) up to Week 8 Among Participants With Abnormal Fecal Lactoferrin (>7.24 mcg/g) at Baseline

    Number of participants with normalized fecal lactoferrin (<=7.24 mcg/g) up to Week 8 among participants with abnormal fecal lactoferrin (> 7.24 mcg/g) at baseline were reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 or who had a missing fecal lactoferrin value at the designated analysis timepoint were considered not to have normalized fecal lactoferrin.

    Measured: Up to Week 8

  30. Induction Study - Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Concentration Through Week 8

    Change from baseline in fecal calprotectin concentration through Week 8 was reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing fecal calprotectin value at the designated analysis timepoint had their last value carried forward.

    Measured: Baseline through Week 8

  31. Induction Study - Number of Participants With Normalized Fecal Calprotectin (<=250 mg/kg) up to Week 8 Among Participants With Abnormal Fecal Calprotectin (>250 mg/kg) at Baseline

    Number of participants with normalized fecal calprotectin (<=250 milligram per kilogram [mg/kg) up to Week 8 among participants with abnormal fecal calprotectin (>250 mg/kg) at baseline were reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 or who had a missing fecal calprotectin value at the designated analysis timepoint were considered not to have normalized fecal calprotectin.

    Measured: Up to Week 8

  32. Induction Study - Number of Participants With a >20-point Improvement From Baseline in Total Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score at Week 8

    The IBDQ is 32-item questionnaire for participants with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) used to evaluate disease-specific health-related quality of life. IBDQ consists of 32 items, each item score ranged from 1 (worst possible response) to 7 (best possible response). The 32 items were grouped into 4 domains: bowel function, emotional status, systemic symptoms and social function. The 4 domains were scored as follows: 10 to 70 (bowel symptoms); 5 to 35 (systemic symptoms); 12 to 84 (emotional function); and 5 to 35 (social function). For each domain, higher score indicated better quality of life. Total score is sum of each item score and ranges from 32 to 224 with higher score indicating better quality of life. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 8 or who had a missing IBDQ score at either baseline or Week 8 were considered not to have achieved a greater than 20-point improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 8

  33. Induction Study - Change From Baseline in IBDQ Dimension Scores at Week 8

    The IBDQ is 32-item questionnaire for participants with IBD used to evaluate disease-specific health-related quality of life. IBDQ consists of 32 items, each item score ranged from 1 (worst possible response) to 7 (best possible response). The 32 items were grouped into 4 domains: bowel function, emotional status, systemic symptoms and social function. The 4 domains were scored as: 10 to 70 (bowel symptoms); 5 to 35 (systemic symptoms); 12 to 84 (emotional function); and 5 to 35 (social function). For each domain, higher score indicated better quality of life. Total score is sum of each item score and ranges from 32 to 224 with higher score indicating better quality of life. Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from time of event onward and participants who had missing IBDQ dimension score at designated analysis timepoint had their last value carried forward.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 8

  34. Induction Study - Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS) at Week 8

    SF-36 evaluates 8 individual subscales (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health). Each 8 scales scored from 0 to 100 with higher scores= better health. Based on scale scores, physical component summary (PCS: calculated from subscales physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health) and mental component summary (MCS: calculated from subscales vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health) scores were derived. Summary MCS and PCS score is also scaled from 0 to 100 with higher scores= better health. Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from time of event onward or participants who had missing component summary score at Week 8 had their last value carried forward.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 8

  35. Induction Study - Change From Baseline in Individual Subscales of 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) at Week 8

    SF-36 evaluates 8 individual subscales (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health). Each 8 scales scored from 0 to 100 with higher scores= better health. Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from time of event onward or participants who had missing individual scale at a designated analysis timepoint had their last value carried forward.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 8

  36. Induction Study - Change From Baseline in EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Health Questionnaire Index Score at Week 8

    EQ-5D descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels of perceived problems (1-no problem, 2-slight problems, 3-moderate problems, 4-severe problems, 5-extreme problems). The responses to 5 EQ-5D dimensions were scored using a utility-weighted algorithm to derive an EQ-5D health status index score between 0 (death) to 1 (full health). Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from time of event onward or participants who had missing score at a designated analysis timepoint had their last value carried forward.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 8

  37. Induction Study - Change From Baseline in EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Health State Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 8

    The EQ-5D VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical, VAS, with 0 representing the worst imaginable health state and 100 representing the best imaginable health state. The EQ VAS is used as a quantitative measure of health outcome as judged by the individual participant. Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from time of event onward or participants who had missing score at a designated analysis timepoint had their last value carried forward.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 8

  38. Induction Study - Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Score at Week 8

    EQ-5D descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels of perceived problems (1-no problem, 2-slight problems, 3-moderate problems, 4-severe problems, 5-extreme problems). The responses to 5 EQ-5D dimensions were scored using a utility-weighted algorithm to derive an EQ-5D health status index score between 0 (death) to 1 (full health). Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 8 had their baseline value carried forward from time of event onward or participants who had missing score at a designated analysis timepoint had their last value carried forward. Percentage of participants with various responses to the 5 dimensions were reported.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 8

  39. Maintenance Study - Change From Maintenance Baseline in Mayo Score at Week 44

    The Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores and values range from 0 to 12 scores, where 3 to 5 = mild; 6 to 10 = moderate; and 11 to 12 = severe; higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy , or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward or who had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 44 had their last available individual Mayo subscores carried forward. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 44

  40. Maintenance Study - Change From Induction Baseline in Mayo Score at Week 44

    The Mayo score consists of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total Mayo score is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores and values range from 0 to 12 scores, where 3 to 5 = mild; 6 to 10 = moderate; and 11 to 12 = severe; higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward from the time of the event onward or who had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 44 had their last available individual Mayo subscores carried forward. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.

    Measured: Induction Baseline and Week 44

  41. Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Stool Frequency) up to Week 44

    Stool frequency subscore of Mayo score is rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Stool frequency scores: 0 =normal number of stools, 1 = 1-2 stools more than normal, 2 = 3-4 stools more than normal, 3 = 5 or more stools more than normal. Higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward from the time of the event onward or who had a missing Mayo subscores at a timepoint had the last available value for that subscore carried forward.

    Measured: Up to Week 44

  42. Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Rectal Bleeding) up to Week 44

    The rectal bleeding subscore of the Mayo Score is rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Rectal bleeding scores: 0 = no blood seen, 1 = streaks of blood with stool <half time, 2 = obvious blood with stool most of time, and 3 = blood alone passed. Higher scores = worsening of disease. Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ due to AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 had their Week 0 value of induction study carried forward from time of event onward and who had missing Mayo subscores at timepoint had last available value for that subscore carried forward.

    Measured: Up to Week 44

  43. Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Endoscopy Findings) at Week 44

    The endoscopy findings subscore of the Mayo score is rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Endoscopy finding scores: 0 =normal/ inactive disease, 1 =mild disease (erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability), 2 =moderate disease (marked erythema, absent vascular pattern, friability, erosions), and 3 =severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration). Higher scores = worsening of disease. Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication/ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 had Week 0 value of induction study carried forward from time of event onward and who had missing endoscopy subscores at timepoint had last available value for that subscore carried forward. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.

    Measured: Week 44

  44. Maintenance Study - Number of Participants With Individual Mayo Subscore (Physician's Global Assessment) up to Week 44

    The physician's global assessment subscore of the Mayo score is rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Physician's global assessment scores: 0 = normal, 1 = mild disease, 2 = moderate disease, and 3 = severe disease. Higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward from the time of the event onward and who had a missing Mayo subscores at a timepoint had the last available value for that subscore carried forward.

    Measured: Up to Week 44

  45. Maintenance Study - Change From Maintenance Baseline in Partial Mayo Score Through Week 44

    The partial Mayo score, which is sum of 3 subscores of the Mayo score without the endoscopy subscore (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and physician's global assessment subscores), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). The partial Mayo score is calculated as the sum of the 3 subscores and values range from 0 to 9; higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing partial Mayo score at a time point had their last available individual partial Mayo subscore carried forward to that time point.

    Measured: Baseline through Week 44

  46. Maintenance Study - Change From Induction Baseline in Partial Mayo Score Through Week 44

    The partial Mayo score, which is sum of 3 subscores of the Mayo score without the endoscopy subscore (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and physician's global assessment subscores; rated as 0 [normal] to 3 [severe]). The partial Mayo score is calculated as the sum of the 3 subscores and values range from 0 to 9; higher scores indicate worsening of the disease. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing partial Mayo score at a time point had their last available individual partial Mayo subscore carried forward to that time point.

    Measured: Baseline through Week 44

  47. Maintenance Study: Number of Participants in Remission Based on Stool Frequency Subscore of 0 or 1, Rectal Bleeding Subscore of 0, and Endoscopy Subscore of 0 or 1 at Week 44

    Number of participants in remission based on stool frequency subscore of 0 (normal number of stools) or 1 (1-2 stools more than normal), rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (no blood seen), and endoscopy subscore of 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease [erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]) at Week 44 were reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 and who were missing all 3 of the Mayo subscores related to this OM (stool frequency, rectal bleeding subscore, and Mayo endoscopy subscore) at Week 44 were considered not to be in remission. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.

    Measured: Week 44

  48. Maintenance Study: Number of Participants in Remission Based on Stool Frequency Subscore of 0, Rectal Bleeding Subscore of 0, and Endoscopy Subscore of 0 or 1 at Week 44

    Number of participants in remission based on stool frequency subscore of 0 (normal number of stools), rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (no blood seen), and endoscopy subscore of 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease [erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]) at Week 44 were reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 or who were missing all 3 of the Mayo subscores related to this OM (stool frequency, rectal bleeding subscore, and Mayo endoscopy subscore) at Week 44 were considered not to be in remission. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.

    Measured: Week 44

  49. Maintenance Study: Number of Participants in Symptomatic Remission at Week 44

    Symptomatic remission was defined as a Mayo stool frequency subscore of 0 (normal number of stools) or 1 (1-2 stools more than normal) and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (no blood seen). Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 were considered not to be in symptomatic remission from the time of the event onward. Participants who had both stool frequency and rectal bleeding subscores missing at Week 44 were considered not to be in symptomatic remission for that visit. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.

    Measured: Week 44

  50. Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 44 by Biologic Failure Status (As Per Global Definition)

    Global definition of clinical remission: Mayo score <=2 points, with no individual subscore >1. Mayo score included 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, physician's global assessment), rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Total score =sum of 4 subscores and range from 0 to 12, where 3 to 5=mild; 6 to 10=moderate; 11 to 12=severe; higher scores=worsening of disease. BF: participants received treatment with 1/ more TNF antagonists/ vedolizumab at dose approved for treatment of UC, and did not respond initially or responded initially but lost response/ were intolerant of medication. Participants with prohibited change in UC medication/ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study drug due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 or who had all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 44 considered not in clinical remission. Endoscopy subscore assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.

    Measured: Week 44

  51. Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 44 by Biologic Failure Status (As Per US Definition)

    US definition of clinical remission: absolute stool number <=3, Mayo rectal bleeding subscore: 0 (no blood seen), Mayo endoscopy subscore: 0(normal/ inactive disease) or 1(mild disease [erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]). Absolute stool number: average of daily stool number over 3 days. Mayo rectal bleeding and endoscopy subscores: 0(normal) to 3(severe). BF: participants received 1/ more TNF antagonists/ vedolizumab for treatment of UC, not responded initially/ responded initially but lost response/ were intolerant of medicines. Participants with prohibited change in UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study drug due to lack of therapeutic effect /due to AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 or who were missing all 3 of Mayo components (absolute stool number, rectal bleeding and endoscopy) at Week 44 were not in clinical remission. Endoscopy subscore assessed during central review used video of endoscopy.

    Measured: Week 44

  52. Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Response up to Week 44 by Biologic Failure Status

    Clinical response: decrease from IS baseline in Mayo score by >=30% and >=3 points, with either decrease from baseline in RB subscore >=1/ RB subscore of 0/ 1. Mayo score have 4 subscores (SF, RB, endoscopy findings, PGA), rated 0(normal) to 3(severe). Total score=sum of 4 subscores and range from 0 to 12, where 3 to 5=mild; 6 to 10=moderate; 11 to 12=severe; higher scores=worsening of disease. BF: participants received treatment: 1/ more TNF antagonists/ vedolizumab for treating UC, no respond initially/responded initially but lost response/ medication intolerant. Participants with prohibited change in concomitant UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study drug due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsen UC before Week 44, had all 4 Mayo subscores miss at Week44/ lost clinical response at any time before Week44 were not in clinical response upto Week44. Endoscopy subscore assessed during central review used endoscopy video.

    Measured: Up to Week 44

  53. Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Endoscopic Healing at Week 44 by Biologic Failure Status

    Number of participants with endoscopic healing at week 44 by BF status were reported. Endoscopic healing is improvement in endoscopic appearance of mucosa. It is defined as Mayo endoscopic subscore = 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease [erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]). BF: participants received treatment with 1 or more tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists or vedolizumab at dose approved for treatment of UC, and either did not respond initially, responded initially but then lost response, or were intolerant of medication. Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or ostomy or colectomy, or used rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to AE of worsening of UC prior to Week 44 or who had missing endoscopy score at Week 44 were considered not to have endoscopic healing. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.

    Measured: Week 44

  54. Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Endoscopic Healing at Week 44 Among Participants Who Had Achieved Endoscopic Healing at Maintenance Baseline

    Endoscopic healing is improvement in the endoscopic appearance of the mucosa. It is defined as Mayo endoscopic subscore = 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease [erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]). Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 or who had a missing endoscopy score at Week 44 were considered not to have endoscopic healing. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.

    Measured: Week 44

  55. Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Normal or Inactive Mucosal Disease at Week 44

    Normal or inactive mucosal disease is defined as an endoscopy score of 0. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 or who had a missing endoscopy score at Week 44 were considered not to have endoscopic healing. Endoscopy subscore as assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.

    Measured: Week 44

  56. Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 44 and Not Receiving Concomitant Corticosteroids at Week 44 Among Participants Who Received Concomitant Corticosteroids at Maintenance Baseline (Per Global Definition)

    Global definition of clinical remission: Mayo score <=2 points, with no individual subscore >1. Mayo score includes 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy findings, physician's global assessment), rated 0(normal) to 3(severe). Total score=sum of 4 subscores, range: 0 to 12, where 3 to 5=mild; 6 to 10=moderate; 11 to 12=severe; higher scores=worsening of disease. Participants with prohibited change in UC medication/ostomy/colectomy/used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study drug due to lack of therapeutic effect/AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 considered not to achieved OM of clinical remission and not receiving concomitant corticosteroids (corticosteroid-free clinical remission). Participants with all 4 Mayo subscores missing at Week 44 considered not in clinical remission. Participants missing value in corticosteroid use had their last value carried forward. Endoscopy subscore assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.

    Measured: Week 44

  57. Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 44 and Not Receiving Concomitant Corticosteroids at Week 44 Among Participants Who Received Concomitant Corticosteroids at Maintenance Baseline (Per US Definition)

    US definition of clinical remission: absolute stool number <=3, a Mayo rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (no blood seen), and Mayo endoscopy subscore of 0(normal/ inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease [erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]), without PGA. Absolute stool number is average of daily stool number over 3 days. Mayo rectal bleeding and endoscopy findings subscores rated as 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Participants with prohibited change in UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 or who were missing all 3 of Mayo components related to this OM (absolute stool number, rectal bleeding, and endoscopy subscore) at Week 44 were considered not in clinical remission. Participants with missing value in corticosteroid use had last value carried forward. Endoscopy subscore assessed during central review of video of endoscopy was used.

    Measured: Week 44

  58. MS: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Average Daily P.Eq Corticosteroid Dose Through Week 44 Among Participants Who Received Corticosteroids Other Than Budesonide and Beclomethasone Dipropionate at Maintenance Baseline

    The change from maintenance baseline in average daily prednisone-equivalent (P.Eq) corticosteroid dose through Week 44 among the participants receiving concomitant corticosteroids other than budesonide and beclomethasone dipropionate at maintenance baseline was reported. Participants who had prohibited change in UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing value in corticosteroid use at a timepoint had their last available value carried forward to that timepoint.

    Measured: Baseline Through Week 44

  59. Maintenance Study: Number of Participants Not Receiving Concomitant Corticosteroids at Week 44 Among Participants Who Received Concomitant Corticosteroids at Maintenance Baseline

    Number of participants not receiving concomitant corticosteroids at Week 44 among participants who received concomitant corticosteroids at maintenance Baseline were reported. Participants who had prohibited change in UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 considered to be receiving concomitant corticosteroids at Week 44. Participants who had a missing value in corticosteroid use at Week 44 had their last value carried forward.

    Measured: Week 44

  60. Maintenance Study: Number of Participants Who Maintained 20-point Improvement From Induction Baseline in IBDQ up to Week 44 Among Participants With a >20-point Improvement in IBDQ at Maintenance Baseline

    IBDQ is 32-item questionnaire for participants with IBD used to evaluate disease-specific health-related quality of life. IBDQ consists of 32 items, each item score ranged from 1 (worst possible response) to 7 (best possible response). The 32 items were grouped into 4 domains: bowel function, emotional status, systemic symptoms and social function. The 4 domains were scored as:10 to 70 (bowel symptoms); 5 to 35 (systemic symptoms); 12 to 84 (emotional function); and 5 to 35 (social function). For each domain, higher score indicated better quality of life. Total score is sum of each item score and ranges from 32 to 224 with higher score indicating better quality of life. Participants who had prohibited change in UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 or who had missing IBDQ score were considered not to have maintained improvement in IBDQ.

    Measured: Up to Week 44

  61. Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in the IBDQ Score at Week 20 and 44

    IBDQ is 32-item questionnaire for participants with IBD used to evaluate disease-specific health-related quality of life. IBDQ consists of 32 items, each item score ranged from 1 (worst possible response) to 7 (best possible response). The 32 items were grouped into 4 domains: bowel function, emotional status, systemic symptoms and social function. The 4 domains were scored as follows: 10 to 70 (bowel symptoms); 5 to 35 (systemic symptoms); 12 to 84 (emotional function); and 5 to 35 (social function). For each domain, higher score indicated better quality of life. Total score is sum of each item score and ranges from 32 to 224 with higher score indicating better quality of life. Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or ostomy or colectomy prior to the Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward from the time of the event onward and participants who had a missing IBDQ score at a timepoint had their last value carried forward.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 20, and 44

  62. Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in the IBDQ Dimension Scores at Week 20 and 44

    The IBDQ is 32-item questionnaire for participants with IBD used to evaluate disease-specific health-related quality of life. IBDQ consists of 32 items, each item score ranged from 1 (worst possible response) to 7 (best possible response). The 32 items were grouped into 4 domains: bowel function, emotional status, systemic symptoms and social function. The 4 domains were scored as: 10 to 70 (bowel symptoms); 5 to 35 (systemic symptoms); 12 to 84 (emotional function); 5 to 35 (social function). For each domain, higher score indicated better quality of life. Total score is sum of each item score and ranges from 32 to 224 with higher score indicating better quality of life. Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or ostomy or colectomy prior to Week 44 had their Week 0 value of induction study carried forward from time of event onward and participants who had missing IBDQ dimension score at a timepoint had their last available value carried forward.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 20, and 44

  63. Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS) at Weeks 20 and 44

    SF-36 evaluates 8 individual subscales (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, mental health). Each 8 scales scored from 0 to 100 with higher scores= better health. Based on scale scores, PCS (calculated from subscales physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health) and MCS (calculated from subscales vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health) scores were derived. Summary MCS and PCS score is also scaled from 0 to 100 with higher scores= better health. Participants with prohibited change in concomitant UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ due to AE of worsening of UC before Week 44 had Week 0 value of IS carried forward from time of event onward and participants with missing component summary score at timepoint had last available value carried forward.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 20, and 44

  64. Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Individual Subscales of 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) at Weeks 20 and 44

    SF-36 evaluates 8 individual subscales (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health). Each 8 scales scored from 0 to 100 with higher scores= better health. Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to AE of worsening of UC prior to Week 44 had Week 0 value of induction study carried forward from time of event onward and participants with missing individual scale score at timepoint had last available value carried forward.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 20, and 44

  65. Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Health Questionnaire Index Score at Weeks 20 and 44

    EQ-5D descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels of perceived problems (1-no problem, 2-slight problems, 3-moderate problems, 4-severe problems, 5-extreme problems). The responses to 5 EQ-5D dimensions were scored using a utility-weighted algorithm to derive an EQ-5D health status index score between 0 (death) to 1 (full health). Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward from the time of the event onward and participants who had a missing individual scale score at a timepoint had their last available value carried forward.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 20, and 44

  66. Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 (EQ-5D) Health State Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Weeks 20 and 44

    The EQ-5D VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical, VAS, with 0 representing the worst imaginable health state and 100 representing the best imaginable health state. The EQ VAS is used as a quantitative measure of health outcome as judged by the individual participant. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward from the time of the event onward and participants who had a missing VAS score at a timepoint had their last available value carried forward.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 20 and 44

  67. Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants With Change From Maintenance Baseline in EuroQOL-5 (EQ-5D) Dimensions Score at Weeks 20 and 44

    EQ-5D descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels of perceived problems (1-no problem, 2-slight problems, 3-moderate problems, 4-severe problems, 5-extreme problems). The responses to 5 EQ-5D dimensions were scored using a utility-weighted algorithm to derive an EQ-5D health status index score between 0 (death) to 1 (full health). Participants who had prohibited change in concomitant UC medication/ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to AE of worsening of UC prior to Week 44 had their Week 0 value of induction study carried forward from time of event onward and who had missing individual scale score at timepoint had their last available value carried forward. Percentage of participants with various responses to the 5 dimensions were reported.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 20, and 44

  68. Maintenance Study: Number of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 44

    Mucosal healing included EH and HH. EH: endoscopy subscore of 0 (normal/ inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease [erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]). HH: neutrophil infiltration in <5% of crypts, no crypt destruction, no erosions/ ulcerations/ granulation tissue. Participants with prohibited change in concomitant UC medication/ ostomy/ colectomy/ used rescue medication after clinical flare/ discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect/ due to AE of worsening of UC prior to Week 44/ missing endoscopy score/ missing any component of histologic healing (i.e. assessment of neutrophils in crypts, crypt destruction/ erosions/ ulcerations/ granulations) at Week 44 and had unevaluable biopsy (biopsy collected but could not assessed due to sample preparation/ technical errors) at Week 44, but who did not achieve endoscopic healing, considered not to have mucosal healing. Endoscopy subscore assessed during central review used endoscopy video.

    Measured: Week 44

  69. Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Concentration at Weeks 8, 24, and 44

    Change from Maintenance baseline in CRP concentration at Weeks 8, 24, and 44 were reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing CRP value at the designated analysis timepoint had their last value carried forward.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 8, 24, and 44

  70. Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Fecal Lactoferrin Concentration at Weeks 8, 24, and 44

    Change from Maintenance baseline in fecal lactoferrin concentration at Weeks 8, 24, and 44 were reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing fecal lactoferrin value at the designated analysis timepoint had their last value carried forward.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 8, 24, and 44

  71. Maintenance Study: Change From Maintenance Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Concentration at Weeks 8, 24, and 44

    Change from Maintenance baseline in fecal calprotectin concentration at Weeks 8, 24, and 44 were reported. Participants who had a prohibited change in concomitant UC medication or an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC prior to the Week 44 had their Week 0 value of the induction study carried forward from the time of the event onward. Participants who had a missing fecal calprotectin value at the designated analysis timepoint had their last value carried forward.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 8, 24, and 44

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Apr 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start10 Jul 2015
  3. Primary completion10 Aug 2018
  4. Study completion30 Nov 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
961 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02407236
Sponsor's protocol ID
CR106920
Other IDs
2014-005606-38, CNTO1275UCO3001, 2014
Acronym
UNIFI
Status last verified
Apr 2025
First submitted
30 Mar 2015
Last updated
29 Apr 2025
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Danese S, Leong RW, Sands BE, Ma T, Marano C, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Clinical Trial: Association Between Early Disease Clearance and Long-Term Outcomes-4-Year Results From the Phase 3 UNIFI Study of Ustekinumab in Ulcerative Colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Sep;62(5):483-492. doi: 10.1111/apt.70264. Epub 2025 Jul 16.

    PubMed 40668079
  • Solitano V, Panaccione R, Sands BE, Wang Z, Hogan M, Zou G, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Danese S, Cornfield LJ, Feagan BG, Singh S, Jairath V, Ma C. Responsiveness of different disease activity indices in moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. Med. 2025 Feb 14;6(2):100512. doi: 10.1016/j.medj.2024.09.001. Epub 2024 Oct 4.

    PubMed 39368474
  • Ghosh S, Feagan BG, Ott E, Gasink C, Godwin B, Marano C, Miao Y, Ma T, Loftus EV Jr, Sandborn WJ, Danese S, Abreu MT, Sands BE. Safety of Ustekinumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Pooled Safety Analysis Through 5 Years in Crohn's Disease and 4 Years in Ulcerative Colitis. J Crohns Colitis. 2024 Aug 6;18(7):1091-1101. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae013.

    PubMed 38310565
  • Afif W, Arasaradnam RP, Abreu MT, Danese S, Sandborn WJ, Miao Y, Zhang H, Panaccione R, Hisamatsu T, Scherl EJ, Leong RW, Rowbotham DS, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Sands BE, Marano C. Efficacy and Safety of Ustekinumab for Ulcerative Colitis Through 4 Years: Final Results of the UNIFI Long-Term Maintenance Study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 May 1;119(5):910-921. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002621. Epub 2023 Dec 14.

    PubMed 38095692
  • Chen R, Li L, Tie Y, Chen M, Zhang S. Trajectory of fecal lactoferrin for predicting prognosis in ulcerative colitis. Precis Clin Med. 2023 Sep 5;6(3):pbad022. doi: 10.1093/pcmedi/pbad022. eCollection 2023 Sep.

    PubMed 38025971
  • Danese S, Sands BE, Abreu MT, O'Brien CD, Bravata I, Nazar M, Miao Y, Wang Y, Rowbotham D, Leong RWL, Arasaradnam RP, Afif W, Marano C. Early Symptomatic Improvement After Ustekinumab Therapy in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: 16-Week Data From the UNIFI Trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Dec;20(12):2858-2867.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.02.050. Epub 2022 Mar 8.

    PubMed 35276329
  • Panaccione R, Danese S, Sandborn WJ, O'Brien CD, Zhou Y, Zhang H, Adedokun OJ, Tikhonov I, Targan S, Abreu MT, Hisamatsu T, Scherl EJ, Leong RW, Rowbotham DS, Arasaradnam RP, Sands BE, Marano C. Ustekinumab is effective and safe for ulcerative colitis through 2 years of maintenance therapy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Dec;52(11-12):1658-1675. doi: 10.1111/apt.16119. Epub 2020 Oct 21.

    PubMed 33086438
  • Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Danese S, O'Brien CD, Ott E, Marano C, Baker T, Zhou Y, Volger S, Tikhonov I, Gasink C, Sands BE, Ghosh S. Safety of Ustekinumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Pooled Safety Analysis of Results from Phase 2/3 Studies. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2021 Jun 15;27(7):994-1007. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izaa236.

    PubMed 32964215
  • Li K, Marano C, Zhang H, Yang F, Sandborn WJ, Sands BE, Feagan BG, Rubin DT, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Friedman JR, De Hertogh G. Relationship Between Combined Histologic and Endoscopic Endpoints and Efficacy of Ustekinumab Treatment in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis. Gastroenterology. 2020 Dec;159(6):2052-2064. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.08.037. Epub 2020 Aug 25.

    PubMed 32853634
  • Sands BE, Sandborn WJ, Panaccione R, O'Brien CD, Zhang H, Johanns J, Adedokun OJ, Li K, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Van Assche G, Danese S, Targan S, Abreu MT, Hisamatsu T, Szapary P, Marano C; UNIFI Study Group. Ustekinumab as Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis. N Engl J Med. 2019 Sep 26;381(13):1201-1214. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1900750.

    PubMed 31553833

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Ustekinumab IV and Ustekinumab SC in people with Colitis, Ulcerative and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 247 sites in 23 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 247 sites in United States, Japan, Ukraine, France, Australia and 18 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Dec 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Induction Study - Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 8 (As Per Global Definition) (time frame: Week 8). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02407236, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in