ObesityATHISNCT02407093
Army Training at High Intensity Study
A study testing High-Intensity Functional Training and Army Physical Readiness Training in people with Obesity, run by Kansas State University at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Although soldiers must be ready to respond to occupational and war theatre demands at a moment's notice, there is an epidemic of overweight and obesity and a need for improved fitness and health in the military. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 64 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Obesity
- What is being tested?
- High-Intensity Functional Training and Army Physical Readiness Training
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 138 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 28 Oct 2015to 28 Jun 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 64 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- physical activity clearance to participate in the study via the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire;
- willingness to adhere to study protocol and complete all study assessments; and
- high likelihood of assignment to the military post over the 8 (+/-) 1-month course of the study.
Who cannot join
- being on permanent or temporary medical profile or having any medical condition or injury which would prevent participation in the exercise protocols;
- having a pacemaker or other implanted/internal electrical device;
- currently on administrative leave or assigned to exclusively administrative duties; and
- (if female) pregnant or lactating, or planning to become pregnant in the next 9-months.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
Fort Leavenworth
Leavenworth, Kansas, 66027
Kansas State University
Manhattan, Kansas, 66506
About this study
Official title: HIFT for Obesity Prevention, Fitness and Health Promotion in Military Personnel
Although soldiers must be ready to respond to occupational and war theatre demands at a moment's notice, there is an epidemic of overweight and obesity and a need for improved fitness and health in the military. Using a cluster randomized clinical trial we propose to test the effectiveness of a High-Intensity Functional Training (HIFT) exercise intervention to improve the body composition and fitness of active duty military personnel. The effectiveness of the HIFT intervention will be compared to usual Army Physical Readiness Training. Main outcomes will include changes in body composition and traditional fitness measures, a test of combat-preparation, and measures of cardiovascular health risk for both groups.
Read the detailed description
We will examine the effectiveness of a high-intensity functional training (HIFT) exercise intervention compared to Army Physical Readiness Training (APRT) and their related dietary instructions in improving body composition (percent body fat [%BF], fat mass, lean body mass, weight) and domains of Total Force Fitness (TFF; Army Physical Fitness Test [APFT], aerobic capacity, power, strength, and combat preparation and readiness) in a 6-month cluster-randomized clinical trial (CRCT) with 2 (+/- 1) month follow-up. We also will examine the effects of both exercise programs on cardiovascular disease (CVD) health risk (resting heart rate, blood pressure). We will conduct assessments at baseline, 6-months, and 2-month follow-up (+/- 1 month). We also will assess training time/volume, injuries, adverse events, adherence, and participant satisfaction and account for demographic and psychosocial variables.
In our CRCT, we aim to recruit and randomize approximately 150 soldiers (n=15 clusters-staff groups/platoons-per condition with at least 5 soldiers nested within each cluster) comparing the effectiveness of HIFT versus usual care (APRT) on:
Specific Aim 1 - changes in body composition including: percent body fat (%BF), fat mass, fat free mass, and body weight.
We hypothesize that soldiers in the HIFT condition will be significantly more likely to decrease a. %BF and b. fat mass, and to increase c. fat free mass than those in the APRT condition; we expect both groups to d. maintain body weight.
Specific Aim 2 - changes in fitness (e.g., APFT, power, strength), while accounting for actual physical training time in each condition.
We hypothesize that soldiers in the HIFT condition will have significantly greater improvement in their performance on fitness tests when compared to those in APRT, despite significantly less total training time. These outcomes will help determine if functional-oriented training can result in better fitness and combat preparedness for Army personnel.
- Conditions
- Obesity
- Being tested
- High-Intensity Functional Training, Army Physical Readiness Training
- Keywords
- Body Composition, Military, High-Intensity Functional Training, Army Physical Fitness, CrossFit
- Medical subject headings
- Obesity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
High-Intensity Functional TrainingBehavioural
Also called CrossFit
Constantly varied functional movements performed at a high intensity and incorporating monostructural (aerobic), gymnastics (body weight) and/or weightlifting movements. CrossFit is a good model of HIFT for the military because of its emphasis on general physical preparedness and functional movements and because it is open source and programming is available at no cost (see www.crossfit.com). Sixty-minute HIFT sessions will include a warm-up, workout and cool down. Workouts will average 15 minutes in duration (range = 5-45 minutes) for a total of 50-100 minutes per week.
Army Physical Readiness TrainingBehavioural
Also called Army PT
Usual physical training program for Army personnel from directive FM 7-22, using the Reset phase. Exercises will address strength, endurance, and mobility training. APRT is designed to be completed in 60-90 minute sessions, 5 days/week for a total dose of 300-450 minutes per week.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| High-Intensity Functional Training | Experimental | CrossFit will be the HIFT intervention framework with training elements, exercise programming, and scheduling set by CrossFit staff. Workouts will be comprised of one or more of three exercise modalities: aerobic/monostructural (e.g., running), gymnastics (e.g., pullups), and weightlifting/resistance training with workouts designed to maximize use of equipment available in deployed environments (e.g.,vehicle tires). All workouts will be individually scaled to each soldier's current level of fitness by a certified trainer. Sessions will be standardized across the 6 months of intervention so that each cluster will receive exactly the same training. Receives: Behavioral: High-Intensity Functional Training |
| Army Physical Readiness Training | Active comparator | The APRT program has combat readiness as the primary focus and is mandated for active duty personnel. For this study, APRT sessions have been standardized across the 6 months of the intervention according to FM 7-22 "Army Physical Readiness Training" manual so each cluster will receive the same training program using the Reset Phase. Sessions will consist of preparation, activities and recovery and will include strength, endurance, and mobility exercises that involve on-ground (e.g., running), off-ground (e.g., climbing), and combatives (e.g., striking and grappling) training, with supervision by a certified trainer. Receives: Behavioral: Army Physical Readiness Training |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
body fat percentage
The Tanita 300 digital bioelectrical impedance/weight scale will be used to estimate body fat percentage.
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (12)
aerobic capacity
Aerobic capacity will be estimated from the time during the APFT 2-mile run.
Measured: 6 months
muscular power
A standing horizontal jump will be used to assess power with the best of three attempts recorded.
Measured: 6 months
muscular strength
We will assess participants' strength by determining their one repetition maximum (1RM) using the deadlift. Use of the 1RM test is a safe and reliable method of assessing strength in both trained and untrained subjects. The test procedure begins with a warm-up of 5-10 repetitions at 40% to 60% of the participant's estimated maximum. After a brief rest period, the load is increased to 60% to 80% of the participant's estimated maximum, attempting to complete 3-5 repetitions. At this point a small increase in weight is added to the load and a 1RM lift is attempted. The goal is to determine the participant's 1RM in 3 to 5 trials, allowing for ample rest (3-5 minutes) between each 1RM attempt.
Measured: 6 months
muscular endurance
We will also assess upper body muscular endurance using the Marines pull-up test, where participants will complete as many consecutive strict pull-ups as possible before dropping off the bar.
Measured: 6 months
simulated victim rescue
This test will simulate rescuing a wounded soldier on the battlefield. After a verbal signal, the participant will drag a 165-lb dummy 35-ft around a barrel and back 35-ft across the starting line for time.
Measured: 6 months
blood pressure
An Omron BP785 10 series monitor will be used to assess blood pressure after the participant has been seated comfortably for at least 5 minutes.
Measured: 6 months
resting heart rate
An Omron BP785 10 series monitor will be used to assess resting heart rate after the participant has been seated comfortably for at least 5 minutes.
Measured: 6 months
fat mass
The Tanita 300 digital bioelectrical impedance/weight scale will be used to estimate fat mass
Measured: 6 months
fat free mass
The Tanita 300 digital bioelectrical impedance/weight scale will be used to estimate fat free mass
Measured: 6 months
body mass index (BMI)
Measured height (via stadiometer) and measured weight (via Tanita 300) will be used to calculate BMI
Measured: 6 months
waist circumference
Waist circumference will be taken three times twice to the nearest 0.1 cm using standardized landmarks with a spring-loaded tape measure and will be used as a measure of central adiposity
Measured: 6 months
Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT)
The APFT measures muscular and cardiorespiratory endurance and consists of 2 minutes of pushups, 2 minutes of sit-ups, and a 2 mile run with 10-20 minutes recovery between events.
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Apr 2015 (estimated)
- Study start28 Oct 2015
- Primary completion28 Jun 2019
- Study completion28 Jun 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ObesityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 138 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Kansas State University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Development and Research Institutes, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Katie M. Heinrich, Kansas State University
- Investigators
- Katie M Heinrich, PhD, Principal investigator, Kansas State UniversityWalker SC Poston, PhD, MPH, Principal investigator, National Develop and Research Institutes
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02407093
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1R01DK099516-01A1
- Acronym
- ATHIS
- Status last verified
- Nov 2020
- First submitted
- 30 Mar 2015
- Last updated
- 13 Nov 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Poston WS, Haddock CK, Heinrich KM, Jahnke SA, Jitnarin N, Batchelor DB. Is High-Intensity Functional Training (HIFT)/CrossFit Safe for Military Fitness Training? Mil Med. 2016 Jul;181(7):627-37. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00273.
PubMed 27391615Haddock CK, Poston WS, Heinrich KM, Jahnke SA, Jitnarin N. The Benefits of High-Intensity Functional Training Fitness Programs for Military Personnel. Mil Med. 2016 Nov;181(11):e1508-e1514. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00503.
PubMed 27849484Poston WS, Haddock CK, Heinrich KM, Jahnke SA, Jitnarin N, Batchelor DB, Feito Y, Suminski RR. Response: Is High-Intensity Functional Training (HIFT)/CrossFit Safe for Military Fitness Training? Mil Med. 2017 Jan;182(1):1476-1479. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00369. No abstract available.
PubMed 28051964Feito Y, Heinrich KM, Butcher SJ, Poston WSC. High-Intensity Functional Training (HIFT): Definition and Research Implications for Improved Fitness. Sports (Basel). 2018 Aug 7;6(3):76. doi: 10.3390/sports6030076.
PubMed 30087252
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Nov 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- HIFT for Obesity Prevention, Fitness and Health Promotion in Military Personnel
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02407093
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ATHIS / 1R01DK099516-01A1
- Conditions
- Obesity
- Keywords
- Body Composition, Military, High-Intensity Functional Training, Army Physical Fitness, CrossFit
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 138 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Kansas State UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Development and Research Institutes, Inc.
- Study start
- 28 Oct 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Jun 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Apr 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Although soldiers must be ready to respond to occupational and war theatre demands at a moment's notice, there is an epidemic of overweight and obesity and a need for improved fitness and health in the military. Using a cluster randomized clinical trial we propose to test the effectiveness of a High-Intensity Functional Training (HIFT) exercise intervention to improve the body composition and fitness of active duty military personnel. The effectiveness of the HIFT intervention will be compared to usual Army Physical Readiness Training. Main outcomes will include changes in body composition and traditional fitness measures, a test of combat-preparation, and measures of cardiovascular health risk for both groups.
Detailed description
We will examine the effectiveness of a high-intensity functional training (HIFT) exercise intervention compared to Army Physical Readiness Training (APRT) and their related dietary instructions in improving body composition (percent body fat [%BF], fat mass, lean body mass, weight) and domains of Total Force Fitness (TFF; Army Physical Fitness Test [APFT], aerobic capacity, power, strength, and combat preparation and readiness) in a 6-month cluster-randomized clinical trial (CRCT) with 2 (+/- 1) month follow-up. We also will examine the effects of both exercise programs on cardiovascular disease (CVD) health risk (resting heart rate, blood pressure). We will conduct assessments at baseline, 6-months, and 2-month follow-up (+/- 1 month). We also will assess training time/volume, injuries, adverse events, adherence, and participant satisfaction and account for demographic and psychosocial variables.
In our CRCT, we aim to recruit and randomize approximately 150 soldiers (n=15 clusters-staff groups/platoons-per condition with at least 5 soldiers nested within each cluster) comparing the effectiveness of HIFT versus usual care (APRT) on:
Specific Aim 1 - changes in body composition including: percent body fat (%BF), fat mass, fat free mass, and body weight.
We hypothesize that soldiers in the HIFT condition will be significantly more likely to decrease a. %BF and b. fat mass, and to increase c. fat free mass than those in the APRT condition; we expect both groups to d. maintain body weight.
Specific Aim 2 - changes in fitness (e.g., APFT, power, strength), while accounting for actual physical training time in each condition.
We hypothesize that soldiers in the HIFT condition will have significantly greater improvement in their performance on fitness tests when compared to those in APRT, despite significantly less total training time. These outcomes will help determine if functional-oriented training can result in better fitness and combat preparedness for Army personnel.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| High-Intensity Functional Training | Experimental | Behavioral: High-Intensity Functional TrainingCrossFit will be the HIFT intervention framework with training elements, exercise programming, and scheduling set by CrossFit staff. Workouts will be comprised of one or more of three exercise modalities: aerobic/monostructural (e.g., running), gymnastics (e.g., pullups), and weightlifting/resistance training with workouts designed to maximize use of equipment available in deployed environments (e.g.,vehicle tires). All workouts will be individually scaled to each soldier's current level of fitness by a certified trainer. Sessions will be standardized across the 6 months of intervention so that each cluster will receive exactly the same training. |
| Army Physical Readiness Training | Active comparator | Behavioral: Army Physical Readiness TrainingThe APRT program has combat readiness as the primary focus and is mandated for active duty personnel. For this study, APRT sessions have been standardized across the 6 months of the intervention according to FM 7-22 "Army Physical Readiness Training" manual so each cluster will receive the same training program using the Reset Phase. Sessions will consist of preparation, activities and recovery and will include strength, endurance, and mobility exercises that involve on-ground (e.g., running), off-ground (e.g., climbing), and combatives (e.g., striking and grappling) training, with supervision by a certified trainer. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 64 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- physical activity clearance to participate in the study via the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire;
- willingness to adhere to study protocol and complete all study assessments; and
- high likelihood of assignment to the military post over the 8 (+/-) 1-month course of the study.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- being on permanent or temporary medical profile or having any medical condition or injury which would prevent participation in the exercise protocols;
- having a pacemaker or other implanted/internal electrical device;
- currently on administrative leave or assigned to exclusively administrative duties; and
- (if female) pregnant or lactating, or planning to become pregnant in the next 9-months.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| High-Intensity Functional TrainingAlso: CrossFitConstantly varied functional movements performed at a high intensity and incorporating monostructural (aerobic), gymnastics (body weight) and/or weightlifting movements. CrossFit is a good model of HIFT for the military because of its emphasis on general physical preparedness and functional movements and because it is open source and programming is available at no cost (see www.crossfit.com). Sixty-minute HIFT sessions will include a warm-up, workout and cool down. Workouts will average 15 minutes in duration (range = 5-45 minutes) for a total of 50-100 minutes per week. | Behavioural | High-Intensity Functional Training |
| Army Physical Readiness TrainingAlso: Army PTUsual physical training program for Army personnel from directive FM 7-22, using the Reset phase. Exercises will address strength, endurance, and mobility training. APRT is designed to be completed in 60-90 minute sessions, 5 days/week for a total dose of 300-450 minutes per week. | Behavioural | Army Physical Readiness Training |
Primary outcome
body fat percentage
Time frame: 6 months
The Tanita 300 digital bioelectrical impedance/weight scale will be used to estimate body fat percentage.
12 secondary outcomes
aerobic capacity
Time frame: 6 months
muscular power
Time frame: 6 months
muscular strength
Time frame: 6 months
muscular endurance
Time frame: 6 months
simulated victim rescue
Time frame: 6 months
blood pressure
Time frame: 6 months
resting heart rate
Time frame: 6 months
fat mass
Time frame: 6 months
fat free mass
Time frame: 6 months
body mass index (BMI)
Time frame: 6 months
waist circumference
Time frame: 6 months
Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT)
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Nov 2020.
- Background: PubMed 27391615Poston WS, Haddock CK, Heinrich KM, Jahnke SA, Jitnarin N, Batchelor DB. Is High-Intensity Functional Training (HIFT)/CrossFit Safe for Military Fitness Training? Mil Med. 2016 Jul;181(7):627-37. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00273.
- Background: PubMed 27849484Haddock CK, Poston WS, Heinrich KM, Jahnke SA, Jitnarin N. The Benefits of High-Intensity Functional Training Fitness Programs for Military Personnel. Mil Med. 2016 Nov;181(11):e1508-e1514. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00503.
- Background: PubMed 28051964Poston WS, Haddock CK, Heinrich KM, Jahnke SA, Jitnarin N, Batchelor DB, Feito Y, Suminski RR. Response: Is High-Intensity Functional Training (HIFT)/CrossFit Safe for Military Fitness Training? Mil Med. 2017 Jan;182(1):1476-1479. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00369. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 30087252Feito Y, Heinrich KM, Butcher SJ, Poston WSC. High-Intensity Functional Training (HIFT): Definition and Research Implications for Improved Fitness. Sports (Basel). 2018 Aug 7;6(3):76. doi: 10.3390/sports6030076.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Obesity
RecruitingPhase 4
Translational Health Research Into Vascular and Neurocognitive Effects of Weight Loss
Class I/II Obesity
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Assessing the Impact of Perceptions of Unpredictability on Objective Measures of Food Consumption and Metabolism
Healthy Volunteer, Obestity
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Phase 1/2a Study of WVE-007 in Adults Living With Overweight or Obesity
Overweight and Obesity
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Effects of Tirzepatide on Esophagogastric Junction Mechanics, Reflux Burden, and Gastric Physiology in Adults With Obesity
Obese Adults
Not yet recruitingObservational study
A Natural History of Genetic and Environmental Predictors of Pubertal Timing Among Youth With Obesity
Obesity
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Katie M Heinrich, PhD principal investigator
Kansas State University
Walker SC Poston, PhD, MPH principal investigator
National Develop and Research Institutes
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing High-Intensity Functional Training and Army Physical Readiness Training in people with Obesity, run by Kansas State University at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
body fat percentage (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02407093, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Nov 2020.