AzTrials
AzTrials

ArthritisCHRANCT02405208

A Multi-center Outcomes Clinical Study of the PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder Implant in Humeral Head Resurfacing

An observational study of Arthritis, run by Smith & Nephew, Inc. at 5 sites in 4 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is designed as a multi-center, nonrandomized, uncontrolled, unblinded, prospective clinical outcomes investigation to evaluate the short, mid and long term performance of the PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder prosthesis humeral replacement. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Arthritis
What is being tested?
PyroTITAN HRA
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
156 participants
Where
5 sitesin 4 countries
Study dates
Aug 2010to Sep 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Subjects who require humeral head resurfacing arthroplasty.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients selected for inclusion will present for primary shoulder surface replacement or arthroplasty with any of the following diagnoses:
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Rheumatoid / Inflammatory Arthritis
  • Post-traumatic arthritis.
  • Focal and large (Hill-Sachs) osteochondral defects.
  • Subject is able to or capable of providing consent to participate in the clinical investigation.
  • Subject agrees to comply with this protocol, including participating in required follow-up visits at the investigations site and completing study questionnaires.
  • Subject is at least 21 years of age and skeletally mature at the time of surgery.

Who cannot join

  • Have destruction of the proximal humerus to preclude rigid fixation of the humeral component.
  • Insufficient bone quality as determined by intra-operative evaluation.
  • Have arthritis with defective rotator cuff.
  • Have had a failed rotator cuff surgery.
  • Have loss of musculature, neuromuscular compromise or vascular deficiency in the affected limb rendering the procedure unjustified.
  • Have evidence of active infection.
Show all 17Show fewer
  • Present with a condition of neuromuscular compromise of the shoulder (e.g., neuropathic joints or brachioplexis injury with a flail shoulder joint).
  • Are unwilling or unable to comply with a rehabilitation program or would fail to return for the postoperative follow-up visits prescribed by the protocol.
  • Are skeletally immature.
  • Have a known allergic reaction to pyrocarbon.
  • Have other conditions such as central nervous system disturbances, alcohol or drug addiction, etc. that may make effective evaluation of the joint replacement difficult or impossible.
  • Are currently participating in another clinical study.
  • Have known, active metastatic or neoplastic disease.
  • Are taking > 10mg/day corticosteroids (e.g. prednisone) excluding inhalers, within 3 months prior to surgery.
  • Are under 21 years of age or over 75.
  • .
  • Require glenoid replacement (Glenoid Classification).

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 4 countries.

5 sites in 4 countries

Australia2 sites
  • Brisbane Hand & Upper Limb Clinic

    Brisbane, Queensland, 4001

  • Barwon Health

    Geelong, Victoria, 3220

Other trials in Australia

France1 site
  • Institut Nices

    Nice, 06000

Other trials in France

Sweden1 site
  • Danderyd Hospital

    Stockholm, S-182 88

Other trials in Sweden

United Kingdom1 site
  • Wrightington Hospital

    Wigan, Wrightington, WN6 9EP

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

This study is designed as a multi-center, nonrandomized, uncontrolled, unblinded, prospective clinical outcomes investigation to evaluate the short, mid and long term performance of the PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder prosthesis humeral replacement.

Read the detailed description

This study is designed as a multi-center, nonrandomized, uncontrolled, unblinded, prospective clinical outcomes investigation to evaluate the short, mid and long term performance of the PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder prosthesis humeral replacement. The PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder prosthesis device configuration will include humeral resurfacing CAP without cement. Patients will be selected for recruitment into the study based upon the normally accepted criteria for primary shoulder resurfacing arthroplasty.

The investigation will be conducted by up to 10 International surgeons experienced in HRA. 387 subjects with PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder prosthesis arthroplasties will be implanted and followed for 10 years.

Conditions
Arthritis
Being tested
PyroTITAN HRA
Medical subject headings
Arthritis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PyroTITAN HRADevice

    Humeral resurfacing using the PyroTITAN HRA device

Study groups in NCT02405208
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Primary cohortPrimary cohort will receive the PyroTITAN HRA device
Receives: Device: PyroTITAN HRA

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Device Survival

    Clinical success was determined by the percentage of shoulders with device survival. Survival of the device was measured by the Kaplan-Meier survival estimate with survival defined as all the following:

    • Device remained implanted
    • Absence of device-related complications requiring surgical replacement, removal, or augmentation of components
    • Freedom from chronic dislocation

    Measured: up to 117 months

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Radiographic Success

    Radiographic success determined by:

    • No evidence of device failure, specifically progressive migration or implant loosening
    • Anatomic alignment is a criterion that may be included in the definition of success in some investigations

    Measured: 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 8 years and 10 years

  2. ASES Score

    The ASES Shoulder Score is a functional outcome tool that has been validated for various shoulder conditions. ASES score ranges from 0 to 100, with a score of 0 indicating a worse shoulder condition and 100 indicating the best shoulder condition.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 8 years, and 10 years

  3. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score

    The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score ranges from 0 to 100, with 0 representing no pain (i.e., the best outcome) and 100 representing the worst possible pain (i.e., the worst outcome).

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 8 years, and 10 years

  4. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Satisfaction Score

    Patient satisfaction determined by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Satisfaction score. VAS Satisfaction scores range from 0 to 100, with 0 representing the lowest level of satisfaction (i.e., the worst possible outcome) and 100 representing the highest level of satisfaction (i.e., the best possible outcome).

    Measured: 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 8 years, and 10 years

  5. The Western Ontario of the Shoulder Index (WOOS) Score

    The WOOS Score is a quality of life questionnaire that has been validated for various shoulder conditions. WOOS total score ranges from 0 to 100, with 0 representing the best shoulder condition and 100 representing the worst shoulder condition.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 8 years, and 10 years

  6. Constant-Murley (CM) Score

    The Constant-Murley (CM) Score is a commonly used score of shoulder function. CM scores range from 0 to 100, with a score of 0 indicating a worse shoulder function (i.e., worst outcome) and 100 indicating the best shoulder function (i.e., best outcome).

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 8 years, and 10 years

  7. EQ-5D-3L Quality of Life Score

    The EuroQol 5-Dimension 3-Level (EQ-5D-3L) Quality of Life Score ranges on a scale of 0 to 1, with 0 indicating a worse health condition (i.e., worst outcome) and 1 indicating the best health condition (i.e., best outcome).

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 8 years, and 10 years

  8. EQ-5D-3L VAS Score

    The EuroQol 5-Dimension 3-Level (EQ-5D-3L) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score ranges on a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 indicating a worse health condition (i.e., worst outcome) and 100 indicating the best health condition (i.e., best outcome).

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 8 years, and 10 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Apr 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2010
  3. Primary completionSep 2023
  4. Study completionSep 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
156 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02405208
Sponsor's protocol ID
CP-HRA-002
Acronym
CHRA
Status last verified
Nov 2024
First submitted
4 Nov 2014
Last updated
24 Dec 2025
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Arthritis, run by Smith & Nephew, Inc. at 5 sites in 4 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in Australia, France, Sweden, United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Dec 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Device Survival (time frame: up to 117 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Dec 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in