PTSDNCT02402205
TF-CBT for Adjudicated Youth in Residential Treatment
A study testing TF-CBT in people with PTSD, run by Allegheny Singer Research Institute (also known as Allegheny Health Network Research Institute).
Trial summary
Adjudicated youth often have traumatic stress responses but rarely receive treatment for these problems. This study is a randomized controlled trial to evaluate two alternative implementation strategies for providing an evidence-based trauma treatment, Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT), to therapist… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 13 to 17 years
- Conditions the study is for
- PTSD
- What is being tested?
- TF-CBT
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 210 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jul 2011to Nov 2014
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 13 to 17 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Inclusion Criteria: Consenting mental health therapists in participating residential treatment facilities (RTF)in New Hampshire, Vermont and Connecticut; and the adjudicated youth ages 12-17 years old who are residents in these RTF programs being treated by the participating therapists who 1) are screened positive for having at least one past trauma experience with UCLA PTSD Reaction Index score of >22; 2) assent with legal guardian consent to participate in the project; and 3) are anticipated to remain in the RTF program at least 3 months (long enough to receive TF-CBT treatment).
-
Exclusion Criteria: Guardian or youth refuses;youth does not endorse trauma exposure or symptoms; youth is being discharged too soon to participate; Therapist may use clinical judgment to exclude youth from study based on clinical presentation.
-
About this study
Adjudicated youth often have traumatic stress responses but rarely receive treatment for these problems. This study is a randomized controlled trial to evaluate two alternative implementation strategies for providing an evidence-based trauma treatment, Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT), to therapist who treat adjudicated youth in 18 residential treatment facilities (RTF) in New Hampshire, Vermont, and Connecticut: 1) web-based TF-CBT implementation strategy ("W"), consisting on only web-based training and consultation; versus 2) W plus live TF-CBT implementation strategy, consisting of W plus face-to face training and phone consultation with TF-CBT experts ("W+L").
Read the detailed description
Therapists in each of 18 participating RTFprograms that serve adjudicated youth are randomized to receive either:
- W TF-CBT implementation strategy, provided via the free distance learning resources TF-CBTWeb, (www.musc/edu/tfcbt) and TF-CBTConsult (www.musc.edu/tfcbtconsult); or
- W+L implementation strategy, provided through W + 2 day TF-CBT training plus one year of twice monthly TF-CBT consultation calls with a TF-CBT expert trainer.
All RTF staff receive one day training in trauma-informed care. All therapists in both conditions receive training in screening youth for trauma exposure and symptoms. Data are collected regarding primary outcomes of: 1) number of youth therapists in each condition screen for trauma symptoms, 2) number of youth consent to TF-CBT treatment; 3) number of youth complete TF-CBT, 4) TF-CBT fidelity during treatment. Secondary outcomes include 1)changes in therapist knowledge and satisfaction regarding TF-CBT treatment and 2) youth outcomes including PTSD symptoms, depression and satisfaction with treatment.
- Conditions
- PTSD
- Being tested
- TF-CBT
- Keywords
- Implementation; TF-CBT; adjudicated youth; RTF; trauma
- Medical subject headings
- Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Wounds and Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TF-CBTBehavioural
Web TF-CBT implementation or Web + Live TF-CBT implementation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Web Implementation of TF-CBT | Experimental | Web implementation ("W")provides only web-based (distance learning) training and consultation to mental health therapists providing TF-CBT treatment to adjudicated youth in RTF. Therapists access the initial 10 hour training course(www.musc.edu/tfcbt) and follow-up consultation (www.musc.edu/tfcbtconsult) at their own convenience and as needed during the course of the study, with RTF administrators guaranteeing that therapists have time to do so. This implementation strategy is free and more convenient to therapists and administrators as it can be accessed whenever desired. Receives: Behavioral: TF-CBT |
| Web + Live Implementation of TF-CBT | Experimental | Web + Live ("W+L") implementation provides web-based training and consultation as described in W, and also provides 1) face-to-face training and 2) twice monthly phone consultation with an expert TF-CBT trainer. W+L requires greater resource commitment from therapists and administrators and is less convenient, but provides more specific consultation on the therapists' personal TF-CBT treatment cases. Receives: Behavioral: TF-CBT |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of youth screened for trauma exposure and PTSD symptoms
Number of youth screened for trauma exposure and PTSD symptoms using the UCLA PTSD Reaction Index (online version)in W vs. W+L implementation condition
Measured: Day 1
Number of youth starting TF-CBT
Number of youth who begin TF-CBT treatment in W vs W+L implementation condition
Measured: Day 60
Number of youth completing TF-CBT in each condition
Number of youth completing TF-CBT in W vs W+L conditions
Measured: Day 240 (6 months post start of treatment)
Fidelity of TF-CBT implementation
Therapist fidelity implementing TF-CBT across and between implementation conditions using TF-CBT Fidelity Checklist (online version)
Measured: Day 240
Secondary outcomes (6)
Therapy Procedures Checklist
Therapist comfort with cognitive therapy practices (or change in this during the study) as a predictor of other outcomes between the W vs. W+L group
Measured: Day 1; Day 900 (30 monhts later)
Attitudes toward Computer Usage Scale
Attitudes toward computer usage as a potential covariate of outcomes
Measured: Day 1; Day 900
TF-CBTWeb Knowledge Test
Change in knowledge related to TF-CBT as a moderator of outcomes
Measured: Day 1, Day 900
Youth UCLA PTSD Reaction Index
Change in youth PTSD scores across and between implementation conditions to be examined as a secondary outcome
Measured: Day 1; Day 240 (post treatment_
Mood and Feelings Questionnaire-Short Version
Change in youth depression scores in youth across and between implementation conditions
Measured: Day 1; Day 240 (post treatment)
Youth Satisfaction Survey
Youth satisfaction with therapy across and between implementation conditions
Measured: Day 240 (post treatment)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Mar 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2011
- Primary completionNov 2014
- Study completionNov 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for PTSDStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 210 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Allegheny Singer Research Institute (also known as Allegheny Health Network Research Institute)
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Judith Cohen, Allegheny Singer Research Institute (also known as Allegheny Health Network Research Institute)
- Investigators
- Judith A Cohen, M.D., Principal investigator, West Penn Allegheny Health System
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02402205
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R01MH095208
- Status last verified
- Mar 2015
- First submitted
- 25 Mar 2015
- Last updated
- 30 Mar 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Mar 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- TF-CBT for Adjudicated Youth in Residential Treatment
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02402205
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- R01MH095208
- Conditions
- PTSD
- Keywords
- Implementation; TF-CBT; adjudicated youth; RTF; trauma
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 210 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Allegheny Singer Research Institute (also known as Allegheny Health Network Research Institute)University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
- Study start
- Jul 2011
- Primary completion
- Nov 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Mar 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Adjudicated youth often have traumatic stress responses but rarely receive treatment for these problems. This study is a randomized controlled trial to evaluate two alternative implementation strategies for providing an evidence-based trauma treatment, Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT), to therapist who treat adjudicated youth in 18 residential treatment facilities (RTF) in New Hampshire, Vermont, and Connecticut: 1) web-based TF-CBT implementation strategy ("W"), consisting on only web-based training and consultation; versus 2) W plus live TF-CBT implementation strategy, consisting of W plus face-to face training and phone consultation with TF-CBT experts ("W+L").
Detailed description
Therapists in each of 18 participating RTFprograms that serve adjudicated youth are randomized to receive either:
- W TF-CBT implementation strategy, provided via the free distance learning resources TF-CBTWeb, (www.musc/edu/tfcbt) and TF-CBTConsult (www.musc.edu/tfcbtconsult); or
- W+L implementation strategy, provided through W + 2 day TF-CBT training plus one year of twice monthly TF-CBT consultation calls with a TF-CBT expert trainer.
All RTF staff receive one day training in trauma-informed care. All therapists in both conditions receive training in screening youth for trauma exposure and symptoms. Data are collected regarding primary outcomes of: 1) number of youth therapists in each condition screen for trauma symptoms, 2) number of youth consent to TF-CBT treatment; 3) number of youth complete TF-CBT, 4) TF-CBT fidelity during treatment. Secondary outcomes include 1)changes in therapist knowledge and satisfaction regarding TF-CBT treatment and 2) youth outcomes including PTSD symptoms, depression and satisfaction with treatment.
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Web Implementation of TF-CBT | Experimental | Behavioral: TF-CBTWeb implementation ("W")provides only web-based (distance learning) training and consultation to mental health therapists providing TF-CBT treatment to adjudicated youth in RTF. Therapists access the initial 10 hour training course(www.musc.edu/tfcbt) and follow-up consultation (www.musc.edu/tfcbtconsult) at their own convenience and as needed during the course of the study, with RTF administrators guaranteeing that therapists have time to do so. This implementation strategy is free and more convenient to therapists and administrators as it can be accessed whenever desired. |
| Web + Live Implementation of TF-CBT | Experimental | Behavioral: TF-CBTWeb + Live ("W+L") implementation provides web-based training and consultation as described in W, and also provides 1) face-to-face training and 2) twice monthly phone consultation with an expert TF-CBT trainer. W+L requires greater resource commitment from therapists and administrators and is less convenient, but provides more specific consultation on the therapists' personal TF-CBT treatment cases. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 13 to 17 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TF-CBTWeb TF-CBT implementation or Web + Live TF-CBT implementation | Behavioural | Web + Live Implementation of TF-CBT, Web Implementation of TF-CBT |
Primary outcome
Number of youth screened for trauma exposure and PTSD symptoms
Time frame: Day 1
Number of youth screened for trauma exposure and PTSD symptoms using the UCLA PTSD Reaction Index (online version)in W vs. W+L implementation condition
Number of youth starting TF-CBT
Time frame: Day 60
Number of youth who begin TF-CBT treatment in W vs W+L implementation condition
Number of youth completing TF-CBT in each condition
Time frame: Day 240 (6 months post start of treatment)
Number of youth completing TF-CBT in W vs W+L conditions
Fidelity of TF-CBT implementation
Time frame: Day 240
Therapist fidelity implementing TF-CBT across and between implementation conditions using TF-CBT Fidelity Checklist (online version)
6 secondary outcomes
Therapy Procedures Checklist
Time frame: Day 1; Day 900 (30 monhts later)
Attitudes toward Computer Usage Scale
Time frame: Day 1; Day 900
TF-CBTWeb Knowledge Test
Time frame: Day 1, Day 900
Youth UCLA PTSD Reaction Index
Time frame: Day 1; Day 240 (post treatment_
Mood and Feelings Questionnaire-Short Version
Time frame: Day 1; Day 240 (post treatment)
Youth Satisfaction Survey
Time frame: Day 240 (post treatment)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Mar 2015.
Related trials for PTSD
Recruiting
NightWare and Cardiovascular Health in Women With PTSD
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Cardiovascular Diseases
Not yet recruiting
A Transdiagnostic Sleep Health Intervention for Veterans With PTSD
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Women Who Are Victims of Violence: Treatment of PTSD Through Reactivation of Traumatic Memories Using Propranolol
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, PTSD
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Orexin Antagonism on Fear Extinction in PTSD
Insomnia, PTSD
Recruiting
Advancing Skills Through Consultation, Education, and Novel Technologies
PTSD - Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Judith A Cohen, M.D. principal investigator
West Penn Allegheny Health System
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing TF-CBT in people with PTSD, run by Allegheny Singer Research Institute (also known as Allegheny Health Network Research Institute).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Mar 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of youth screened for trauma exposure and PTSD symptoms (time frame: Day 1). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Mar 2015.