Parkinson's DiseaseNCT02401308
Trial Comparing Functional Outcomes of Awake vs. Asleep Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson's Disease
A study testing Deep Brain Stimulation surgery in people with Parkinson's Disease, run by St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of the proposed study is to demonstrate that the functional outcomes of DBS surgery utilizing the "asleep" technique are not inferior to those reported for traditional "awake" DBS technique. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Parkinson's Disease
- What is being tested?
- Deep Brain Stimulation surgery
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 15 Jan 2015to 5 Oct 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Parkinson's disease per Queens Square criteria
- Appropriate DBS candidate for multi-disciplinary team consensus
- Age 18 - 85 years of age
- Motor skills allowing for capability to complete evaluations
- Medically cleared for undergoing anesthesia and DBS surgery
Who cannot join
- Dementia per DSM-V criteria
- Medical or other condition precluding MRI
- History of supraspinal CNS disease other than PD
- Alcohol use of more than 4 drinks per day
- Pregnancy
- History of suicide attempt
- Currently uncontrolled clinically significant depression (BDI>20)
- History of schizophrenia, delusions, or currently uncontrolled visual hallucinations
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Barrow Neurological Institute / St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center
Phoenix, Arizona, 85013
About this study
Official title: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Functional Outcomes of Awake vs. Asleep Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson's Disease
The purpose of the proposed study is to demonstrate that the functional outcomes of DBS surgery utilizing the "asleep" technique are not inferior to those reported for traditional "awake" DBS technique.
Read the detailed description
Traditional DBS is performed without general anesthesia with the patient awake. Local anesthetic is used to numb the skin and tissue where the incision is made, and the patients are given mild sedatives to alleviate anxiety and discomfort. Parkinson's patients need to be off their medications during awake DBS in order to obtain single-unit cellular recordings to locate and map the desired target. The process of electrophysiological mapping can result in multiple brain penetrations during lead placement, and the entire procedure may last anywhere from 4-6 hours on average. The concept of being awake during brain surgery and being off medications are significant concerns for some patients. In addition, it is widely recognized that microelectrode recording increases the risk of hemorrhage during DBS surgery.
Recently, there has been increasing interest in performing DBS under general anesthesia, where the stimulated targets are located anatomically (i.e. on MRI) rather than physiologically via microelectrode recordings. This technology has been termed "asleep" DBS and is performed with the patient under general anesthesia. Intraoperative imaging is utilized to verify the stereotactic accuracy of DBS electrodes placement at the time of surgery. Because stereotactic accuracy (and surgical safety) is the surgical endpoint, there is no need for the patient to be off medication and awake during the procedure.
Traditional DBS is performed without general anesthesia with the patient awake. Local anesthetic is used to numb the skin and tissue where the incision is made, and the patients are given mild sedatives to alleviate anxiety and discomfort. Parkinson's patients need to be off their medications during awake DBS in order to obtain single-unit cellular recordings to locate and map the desired target. The process of electrophysiological mapping can result in multiple brain penetrations during lead placement, and the entire procedure may last anywhere from 4-6 hours on average. The concept of being awake during brain surgery and being off medications are significant concerns for some patients. In addition, it is widely recognized that microelectrode recording increases the risk of hemorrhage during DBS surgery.
The safety and efficacy of the two approaches to DBS surgery have been equivalent, and we are at a position of equipoise with regard to what to offer to patients. To date, there have been no randomized, controlled clinical trials comparing the efficacy and functional outcomes of the two DBS methods. After informed consent is obtained, the patients will undergo routine DBS pre-operative evaluation and diagnostic testing. This includes a pre-operative 3T-MRI with and without gadolinium as well as pre-operative medical clearance by the patient's PCP or general practitioner and/or other medical specialist if necessary. They will also receive a baseline clinical evaluation including both motor function (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale on and off antiparkinsonian medication) and quality of life (Parkinson's disease Questionnaire-39) if not already completed as part of the routine DBS candidacy evaluation within 2 months of surgery. Patients who elect to participate in this trial will undergo a routine pre-operative neurocognitive evaluation consisting of the following routine evaluative tests: Wechsler Test of Adult Reading, Mattis Dementia Rating Scale 2nd Edition, Wechsler Abbreviate Scale of Intelligence 2nd Edition; Wechsler Memory Scale 3rd edition, Digit Span, Stroop Neuropsychological Screening Test, Trail Making Test, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, Controlled Oral Word Association Test, Animal Naming, Boston Naming Test, Wechsler Memory Scale 4th Edition, Logical Memory, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised, Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised, Hooper visual Organization Test, Judgment of Line Orientation, Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory, Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson's Disease, Apathy Evaluation Scale; Epworth Sleepiness Scale, The subjects will then be randomized to 2 groups by using random numbers in an envelope system. We anticipate that 120 total patients will need to be enrolled in this pilot study (60 awake, 60 asleep), and thus the numbers 1-120 will be placed in envelopes. An odd number will correspond to the awake DBS procedure, and an even number will indicate an asleep DBS procedure.
The purpose of the proposed study is to demonstrate that the functional outcomes of the "asleep" technique are not inferior to those reported for traditional "awake" DBS technique. The primary data points for this study will include six month functional outcomes using accepted metrics for Parkinson's disease, including both motor function (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale [UPDRS] obtained in the medication "on" and medication "off" states) and quality of life (Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39). The null hypothesis is that asleep DBS results in inferior UPDRS-III scores at 6-months after surgery. Our secondary aim will be to evaluate any cognitive changes associated with DBS surgery selection (awake vs. asleep) in PD patients. Current standard of care for patient selection in DBS focuses primarily on the evaluation of motor symptoms and currently there is no guidance for how a patients' DBS surgery selection (awake vs. asleep) would impact on subsequent neurocognitive function.
- Conditions
- Parkinson's Disease
- Being tested
- Deep Brain Stimulation surgery
- Medical subject headings
- Parkinson Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Deep Brain Stimulation surgeryProcedure or surgery
Also called DBS
Deep Brain Stimulation surgery: awake vs. asleep
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Awake DBS Surgery | Active comparator | Deep brain stimulation surgery: Parkinson's patients undergoing traditional "awake" DBS surgery utilizing microelectrode recordings and intra-operative stimulation Receives: Procedure: Deep Brain Stimulation surgery |
| Asleep DBS Surgery | Active comparator | Deep brain stimulation surgery:Parkinson's patients undergoing DBS surgery under general anesthesia utilizing intraoperative imaging to verify the stereotactic accuracy of DBS electrodes placement at the time of surgery. Receives: Procedure: Deep Brain Stimulation surgery |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Functional Outcomes
Motor function outcomes using accepted metrics for Parkinson's disease - the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale [UPDRS] obtained in 3 states:
- medication "off" / device "on".
- Medication "off" / device "off"
- medication "on" / device "on"
Measured: 6 months post-operatively
Secondary outcomes (2)
Neurocognitive Function
Neurocognitive evaluation consisting of the following routine evaluative tests: Wechsler Test of Adult Reading, Mattis Dementia Rating Scale 2nd Edition, Wechsler Abbreviate Scale of Intelligence 2nd Edition; Wechsler Memory Scale 3rd edition, Digit Span, Stroop Neuropsychological Screening Test, Trail Making Test, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, Controlled Oral Word Association Test, Animal Naming, Boston Naming Test, Wechsler Memory Scale 4th Edition, Logical Memory, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised, Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised, Hooper visual Organization Test, Judgment of Line Orientation, Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory, Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson's Disease, Apathy Evaluation Scale; Epworth Sleepiness Scale.
Measured: 6 months post-operatively
Quality of Life
Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 to evaluate the patient's assessment of their quality of life following DBS surgery
Measured: 6 months post-operatively
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Mar 2015 (estimated)
- Study start15 Jan 2015
- Primary completion5 Oct 2015
- Study completion5 Oct 2015
Why it stopped: Lack of subject enrollment.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Parkinson's DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Francisco A Ponce, MD, Principal investigator, Barrow Neurological Institute / St. Joseph's Hosptial and Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02401308
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB # 14BN147
- Status last verified
- Sep 2021
- First submitted
- 24 Mar 2015
- Last updated
- 26 Oct 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Ostrem JL, Galifianakis NB, Markun LC, Grace JK, Martin AJ, Starr PA, Larson PS. Clinical outcomes of PD patients having bilateral STN DBS using high-field interventional MR-imaging for lead placement. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013 Jun;115(6):708-12. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.08.019. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
PubMed 22944465Nakajima T, Zrinzo L, Foltynie T, Olmos IA, Taylor C, Hariz MI, Limousin P. MRI-guided subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation without microelectrode recording: can we dispense with surgery under local anaesthesia? Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2011;89(5):318-25. doi: 10.1159/000330379. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
PubMed 21921673Harries AM, Kausar J, Roberts SA, Mocroft AP, Hodson JA, Pall HS, Mitchell RD. Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus for advanced Parkinson disease using general anesthesia: long-term results. J Neurosurg. 2012 Jan;116(1):107-13. doi: 10.3171/2011.7.JNS11319. Epub 2011 Oct 14.
PubMed 21999316Weaver FM, Follett K, Stern M, Hur K, Harris C, Marks WJ Jr, Rothlind J, Sagher O, Reda D, Moy CS, Pahwa R, Burchiel K, Hogarth P, Lai EC, Duda JE, Holloway K, Samii A, Horn S, Bronstein J, Stoner G, Heemskerk J, Huang GD; CSP 468 Study Group. Bilateral deep brain stimulation vs best medical therapy for patients with advanced Parkinson disease: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009 Jan 7;301(1):63-73. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.929.
PubMed 19126811Pezeshkian P, DeSalles AA, Gorgulho A, Behnke E, McArthur D, Bari A. Accuracy of frame-based stereotactic magnetic resonance imaging vs frame-based stereotactic head computed tomography fused with recent magnetic resonance imaging for postimplantation deep brain stimulator lead localization. Neurosurgery. 2011 Dec;69(6):1299-306. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31822b7069.
PubMed 21725253Papanastassiou V, Rowe J, Scott R, Silburn P, Davies L, Aziz T. Use of the Radionics Image Fusiontrade mark and Stereoplantrade mark programs for target localization in functional neurosurgery. J Clin Neurosci. 1998 Jan;5(1):28-32. doi: 10.1016/s0967-5868(98)90197-7.
PubMed 18644283Alexander E 3rd, Kooy HM, van Herk M, Schwartz M, Barnes PD, Tarbell N, Mulkern RV, Holupka EJ, Loeffler JS. Magnetic resonance image-directed stereotactic neurosurgery: use of image fusion with computerized tomography to enhance spatial accuracy. J Neurosurg. 1995 Aug;83(2):271-6. doi: 10.3171/jns.1995.83.2.0271.
PubMed 7616273Kooy HM, van Herk M, Barnes PD, Alexander E 3rd, Dunbar SF, Tarbell NJ, Mulkern RV, Holupka EJ, Loeffler JS. Image fusion for stereotactic radiotherapy and radiosurgery treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994 Mar 30;28(5):1229-34. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)90499-5.
PubMed 8175410
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Oct 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Functional Outcomes of Awake vs. Asleep Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson's Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02401308
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB # 14BN147
- Conditions
- Parkinson's Disease
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Lack of subject enrollment.
- Enrolment
- 1 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, PhoenixUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Jan 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Oct 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 Oct 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Mar 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 26 Oct 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the proposed study is to demonstrate that the functional outcomes of DBS surgery utilizing the "asleep" technique are not inferior to those reported for traditional "awake" DBS technique.
Detailed description
Traditional DBS is performed without general anesthesia with the patient awake. Local anesthetic is used to numb the skin and tissue where the incision is made, and the patients are given mild sedatives to alleviate anxiety and discomfort. Parkinson's patients need to be off their medications during awake DBS in order to obtain single-unit cellular recordings to locate and map the desired target. The process of electrophysiological mapping can result in multiple brain penetrations during lead placement, and the entire procedure may last anywhere from 4-6 hours on average. The concept of being awake during brain surgery and being off medications are significant concerns for some patients. In addition, it is widely recognized that microelectrode recording increases the risk of hemorrhage during DBS surgery.
Recently, there has been increasing interest in performing DBS under general anesthesia, where the stimulated targets are located anatomically (i.e. on MRI) rather than physiologically via microelectrode recordings. This technology has been termed "asleep" DBS and is performed with the patient under general anesthesia. Intraoperative imaging is utilized to verify the stereotactic accuracy of DBS electrodes placement at the time of surgery. Because stereotactic accuracy (and surgical safety) is the surgical endpoint, there is no need for the patient to be off medication and awake during the procedure.
Traditional DBS is performed without general anesthesia with the patient awake. Local anesthetic is used to numb the skin and tissue where the incision is made, and the patients are given mild sedatives to alleviate anxiety and discomfort. Parkinson's patients need to be off their medications during awake DBS in order to obtain single-unit cellular recordings to locate and map the desired target. The process of electrophysiological mapping can result in multiple brain penetrations during lead placement, and the entire procedure may last anywhere from 4-6 hours on average. The concept of being awake during brain surgery and being off medications are significant concerns for some patients. In addition, it is widely recognized that microelectrode recording increases the risk of hemorrhage during DBS surgery.
The safety and efficacy of the two approaches to DBS surgery have been equivalent, and we are at a position of equipoise with regard to what to offer to patients. To date, there have been no randomized, controlled clinical trials comparing the efficacy and functional outcomes of the two DBS methods. After informed consent is obtained, the patients will undergo routine DBS pre-operative evaluation and diagnostic testing. This includes a pre-operative 3T-MRI with and without gadolinium as well as pre-operative medical clearance by the patient's PCP or general practitioner and/or other medical specialist if necessary. They will also receive a baseline clinical evaluation including both motor function (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale on and off antiparkinsonian medication) and quality of life (Parkinson's disease Questionnaire-39) if not already completed as part of the routine DBS candidacy evaluation within 2 months of surgery. Patients who elect to participate in this trial will undergo a routine pre-operative neurocognitive evaluation consisting of the following routine evaluative tests: Wechsler Test of Adult Reading, Mattis Dementia Rating Scale 2nd Edition, Wechsler Abbreviate Scale of Intelligence 2nd Edition; Wechsler Memory Scale 3rd edition, Digit Span, Stroop Neuropsychological Screening Test, Trail Making Test, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, Controlled Oral Word Association Test, Animal Naming, Boston Naming Test, Wechsler Memory Scale 4th Edition, Logical Memory, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised, Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised, Hooper visual Organization Test, Judgment of Line Orientation, Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory, Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson's Disease, Apathy Evaluation Scale; Epworth Sleepiness Scale, The subjects will then be randomized to 2 groups by using random numbers in an envelope system. We anticipate that 120 total patients will need to be enrolled in this pilot study (60 awake, 60 asleep), and thus the numbers 1-120 will be placed in envelopes. An odd number will correspond to the awake DBS procedure, and an even number will indicate an asleep DBS procedure.
The purpose of the proposed study is to demonstrate that the functional outcomes of the "asleep" technique are not inferior to those reported for traditional "awake" DBS technique. The primary data points for this study will include six month functional outcomes using accepted metrics for Parkinson's disease, including both motor function (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale [UPDRS] obtained in the medication "on" and medication "off" states) and quality of life (Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39). The null hypothesis is that asleep DBS results in inferior UPDRS-III scores at 6-months after surgery. Our secondary aim will be to evaluate any cognitive changes associated with DBS surgery selection (awake vs. asleep) in PD patients. Current standard of care for patient selection in DBS focuses primarily on the evaluation of motor symptoms and currently there is no guidance for how a patients' DBS surgery selection (awake vs. asleep) would impact on subsequent neurocognitive function.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Awake DBS Surgery | Active comparator | Procedure: Deep Brain Stimulation surgeryDeep brain stimulation surgery: Parkinson's patients undergoing traditional "awake" DBS surgery utilizing microelectrode recordings and intra-operative stimulation |
| Asleep DBS Surgery | Active comparator | Procedure: Deep Brain Stimulation surgeryDeep brain stimulation surgery:Parkinson's patients undergoing DBS surgery under general anesthesia utilizing intraoperative imaging to verify the stereotactic accuracy of DBS electrodes placement at the time of surgery. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Parkinson's disease per Queens Square criteria
- Appropriate DBS candidate for multi-disciplinary team consensus
- Age 18 - 85 years of age
- Motor skills allowing for capability to complete evaluations
- Medically cleared for undergoing anesthesia and DBS surgery
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Dementia per DSM-V criteria
- Medical or other condition precluding MRI
- History of supraspinal CNS disease other than PD
- Alcohol use of more than 4 drinks per day
- Pregnancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Deep Brain Stimulation surgeryAlso: DBSDeep Brain Stimulation surgery: awake vs. asleep | Procedure or surgery | Asleep DBS Surgery, Awake DBS Surgery |
Primary outcome
Functional Outcomes
Time frame: 6 months post-operatively
Motor function outcomes using accepted metrics for Parkinson's disease - the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale [UPDRS] obtained in 3 states: 1. medication "off" / device "on". 2. Medication "off" / device "off" 3. medication "on" / device "on"
2 secondary outcomes
Neurocognitive Function
Time frame: 6 months post-operatively
Quality of Life
Time frame: 6 months post-operatively
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Oct 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 22944465Ostrem JL, Galifianakis NB, Markun LC, Grace JK, Martin AJ, Starr PA, Larson PS. Clinical outcomes of PD patients having bilateral STN DBS using high-field interventional MR-imaging for lead placement. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013 Jun;115(6):708-12. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.08.019. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
- Background: PubMed 21921673Nakajima T, Zrinzo L, Foltynie T, Olmos IA, Taylor C, Hariz MI, Limousin P. MRI-guided subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation without microelectrode recording: can we dispense with surgery under local anaesthesia? Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2011;89(5):318-25. doi: 10.1159/000330379. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
- Background: PubMed 21999316Harries AM, Kausar J, Roberts SA, Mocroft AP, Hodson JA, Pall HS, Mitchell RD. Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus for advanced Parkinson disease using general anesthesia: long-term results. J Neurosurg. 2012 Jan;116(1):107-13. doi: 10.3171/2011.7.JNS11319. Epub 2011 Oct 14.
- Background: PubMed 19126811Weaver FM, Follett K, Stern M, Hur K, Harris C, Marks WJ Jr, Rothlind J, Sagher O, Reda D, Moy CS, Pahwa R, Burchiel K, Hogarth P, Lai EC, Duda JE, Holloway K, Samii A, Horn S, Bronstein J, Stoner G, Heemskerk J, Huang GD; CSP 468 Study Group. Bilateral deep brain stimulation vs best medical therapy for patients with advanced Parkinson disease: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009 Jan 7;301(1):63-73. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.929.
- Background: PubMed 21725253Pezeshkian P, DeSalles AA, Gorgulho A, Behnke E, McArthur D, Bari A. Accuracy of frame-based stereotactic magnetic resonance imaging vs frame-based stereotactic head computed tomography fused with recent magnetic resonance imaging for postimplantation deep brain stimulator lead localization. Neurosurgery. 2011 Dec;69(6):1299-306. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31822b7069.
- Background: PubMed 18644283Papanastassiou V, Rowe J, Scott R, Silburn P, Davies L, Aziz T. Use of the Radionics Image Fusiontrade mark and Stereoplantrade mark programs for target localization in functional neurosurgery. J Clin Neurosci. 1998 Jan;5(1):28-32. doi: 10.1016/s0967-5868(98)90197-7.
- Background: PubMed 7616273Alexander E 3rd, Kooy HM, van Herk M, Schwartz M, Barnes PD, Tarbell N, Mulkern RV, Holupka EJ, Loeffler JS. Magnetic resonance image-directed stereotactic neurosurgery: use of image fusion with computerized tomography to enhance spatial accuracy. J Neurosurg. 1995 Aug;83(2):271-6. doi: 10.3171/jns.1995.83.2.0271.
- Background: PubMed 8175410Kooy HM, van Herk M, Barnes PD, Alexander E 3rd, Dunbar SF, Tarbell NJ, Mulkern RV, Holupka EJ, Loeffler JS. Image fusion for stereotactic radiotherapy and radiosurgery treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994 Mar 30;28(5):1229-34. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)90499-5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Parkinson's Disease
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Early Molecular Biomarkers for Differentiating Parkinsonian Syndromes
PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder), Atypical Parkinsonism
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stromal Cells-derived Exosomes in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
Parkinson Disease (PD)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Adaptive DBS to Offset STN Dysregulation During Exercise in PD
Parkinson Disease
Not yet recruiting
Compulsive Eating and Brain's Reward System in Different Pathologies
PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder), Bipolar 1 Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating the Effect of the Zeen Mobility Device on Clinical Practicality, Safety, and Impact (Via Assessments of Walking, Standing Tolerance, Balance, Endurance, Effort, and Participation in Daily Tasks) in an Outpatient Rehabilitation Setting for Individuals With Mobility Impairments.
Stroke, Parkinson's Disease (PD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Francisco A Ponce, MD principal investigator
Barrow Neurological Institute / St. Joseph's Hosptial and Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Deep Brain Stimulation surgery in people with Parkinson's Disease, run by St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Oct 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Oct 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Functional Outcomes (time frame: 6 months post-operatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02401308, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Oct 2021.