Myocardial InfarctionAMIQANCT02399891
Acute Myocardial Infarction Quality Assurance Project
An observational study of Myocardial Infarction and Death, run by Dr. Derek Exner at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Cohort study aimed at evaluating the incidence of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction after myocardial infraction (MI) and assessing the prognostic utility of change in ejection fraction (EF) over the initial 12 months after MI. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Myocardial Infarction, Death, Heart Failure
- What is being tested?
- Quality Assurance Implementation
- How many people
- 6,000 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Dec 2011to Dec 2017
- How long will I take part?
- 2 Years
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients surviving an acute MI.
Who may be able to join
- confirmed MI
Who cannot join
- None
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Foothills Medical Centre
Calgary, Alberta, T3H 4N4
Derek V Exner, MD, MPH, 4032203219
Rozsa Sas, 4032107398, rsas@ucalgary.ca
About this study
Cohort study aimed at evaluating the incidence of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction after myocardial infraction (MI) and assessing the prognostic utility of change in ejection fraction (EF) over the initial 12 months after MI.
Read the detailed description
Background
Patients suffering a myocardial infraction (MI) may have from minimal to extensive myocardial damage. While severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction that persists beyond the initial 2-3 months of an MI is a predictor of sudden death, the prognostic significance of less severe LV dysfunction after MI is unclear.
There is significant clinical value in quantifying LV function after the recovery phase of an MI. This information is vital in guiding the breadth and duration of therapies known to improve prognosis (beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin blockers, anticoagulants, and others). Further, it will identify patients in whom other therapies, such as an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), are recommended. Yet, no guidelines to guide clinical decision making in terms of collecting follow-up ejection fraction (EF) data in such patients who do not also have overt heart failure.
Purpose The Acute Myocardial Infarction Quality Assurance (AMIQA) project proposes to
- document clinical practice by collecting data on the proportion of patients with initial LV dysfunction after MI without a follow-up EF assessment arranged,
- collect follow-up EF data in patients with initial LV dysfunction post-MI and evaluate the prognostic significant of EF early and late after MI as well as factors associated with the change in value, and
- educate physicians regarding the importance of EF reassessment after MI.
Follow up LV assessment
The current guidelines do not clearly provide clear indications to the appropriate timing or modality of follow up left ventricular assessments. We have chosen to define an adequate follow up LV assessment to occur within 2 to 12 months post-myocardial infarction, measured by any modality such as echocardiography, cardiac MRI, or nuclear perfusion scan.
Overall Study Objectives
- To evaluate the relationship of changes in EF after MI with clinical variables such as age, gender, co-morbid conditions, MI characteristics, and the prescription of pharmacological agents after MI.
- To assess the relationship of changes in EF after MI with clinical outcomes.
Study Methodology and Data Collection
This study will be conducted in three phases:
- determining the existing practice of assessing left ventricular ejection fraction following myocardial infarction within the Calgary region (Quality Assurance);
- determining the factors associated with LVEF improvement, stability and decline post-MI and the relationship of these with outcome (Prognostic Factor Study);
- educating the clinical community about the importance of follow up LVEF assessments and reporting the findings of this through presentations, educational materials and/or academic publications (Knowledge Dissemination)
Study Population
The study population will include patients presenting with an acute myocardial infarction (NSTEMI or STEMI) undergoing cardiac catheterization at the Foothills Medical Center, who have significant left ventricular impairment upon initial LV assessment as defined as at least:
- At least mod dysfunction (LVEF < 0.40) if no prior history of MIs (i.e. first MI)
- More than mild-moderate dysfunction (LVEF < 0.45) if prior history of MI Exclusion criteria include: patients lost to follow up by their family physician or primary cardiologist, and patients who are deceased who do not have a follow-up EF.
Patients will be identified using the APPROACH (Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (www.approach.org)) database. All patients will have provided written, informed consent as part of their participation in APPROACH.
AMIQA Phase I: Quality Assurance
Part One (Quality Assurance) will include patients with an MI occurring between July 1, 2010 to November 30, 2011 (15 months). The list of patients who have had myocardial infarctions undergoing cardiac catheterization at the Foothills Medical Center between these dates can be obtained through the APPROACH database. For the patients that meet the initial inclusion criteria for significant LV dysfunction post-MI, the study group will determine if a follow up LVEF assessment has been performed within 2 to 12 months post-MI by contacting the patient's family physician and/or primary cardiologist for any records of LVEF measurements, and searching through the following electronic databases.
AMIQA Phase II: Prognostic Factor Study
Part Two (Prognostic Factor Study) will include patients with myocardial infarctions occurring on December 5, 2011 until December 5, 2012 (12 months). The list of patients who have had myocardial infarctions undergoing cardiac catheterization at the Foothills Medical Center between these dates can be obtained through the APPROACH database. For the patients that meet the initial inclusion criteria for significant LV dysfunction post-MI (as described in section 5.1), the study group will contact the patient, the patient's family physician, and/or patient's primary cardiologist to order a follow up LVEF measurement within 2 to 12 months post- myocardial infarction. That is, all patients that have significant LV dysfunction will undergo follow up LVEF measurements between December 5, 2011 and December 5, 2012. Modalities for follow up LVEF measurements will include echocardiogram, cardiac MRI, and nuclear perfusion imaging at the discretion of the family physician or primary cardiologist.
These follow up LVEF measurements will be entered into the APPROACH database in order to allow us to evaluate the clinical significance of changes in EF after MI and prognostic significance of initial versus follow-up EF values.
Data Analysis
AMIQA Phase I: Quality Assurance
Data collected will be entered into a database and summary statistics will be created (e.g. proportion of follow up LVEF assessments completed post-MI (Aim 5.1), choice of modality for follow up LVEF assessment, etc.) Data collected from the surveys will be entered into a database and analyzed in SAS or Stata. Summary statistics will be created from the data collected in the surveys.
Acute Myocardial Infarction Quality Assurance (AMIQA) Project Research Protocol - Updated Feb 29, 2012
AMIQA Phase II: Prognostic Factor Study
As part of AMIQA Phase II, LVEF assessments will be entered into the APPROACH database. The study will compare initial LVEF measurements post-MI to follow-up LVEF measurements, and assess for improvement, stability and deterioration of LVEF and the factors associated with these changes in LVEF.
This project has received ethics approval by the Conjoint Health Research and Ethics Board of the University of Calgary. Patients will be identified using the APPROACH database have provided written, informed consent as part of their participation in APPROACH. Only the research team will know the names and contact information of the patients included in the study, and this information will be kept confidential.
- Conditions
- Myocardial Infarction, Death, Heart Failure
- Being tested
- Quality Assurance Implementation, Standard of Care
- Keywords
- Remodeling, Prognosis, Incidence, Quality Assurance, Ejection Fraction, Sudden Death
- Medical subject headings
- Myocardial Infarction, Death, Heart Failure, Death, Sudden
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Quality Assurance ImplementationOther
Standard of CareOther
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Retrospective | MI prior to December 11, 2011 Receives: Other: Standard of Care | |
| Prospective | MI on or after December 11, 2011 Receives: Other: Quality Assurance Implementation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mortality
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (2)
Ejection Fraction
Measured: 12 months
Heart Failure Hospitalization
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Mar 2015 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2011
- Primary completionDec 2017 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2017 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Myocardial InfarctionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 6,000 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 2 Years
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Dr. Derek Exner
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Dr. Derek Exner, University of Calgary
- Investigators
- Derek V Exner, MD, MPH, Principal investigator, University of Calgary
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02399891
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- QA20111211
- Acronym
- AMIQA
- Status last verified
- Jun 2016
- First submitted
- 23 Mar 2015
- Last updated
- 8 Jun 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Jun 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Acute Myocardial Infarction Quality Assurance Project
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02399891
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AMIQA / QA20111211
- Conditions
- Myocardial Infarction, Death, Heart Failure
- Keywords
- Remodeling, Prognosis, Incidence, Quality Assurance, Ejection Fraction, Sudden Death
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 6,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Dr. Derek ExnerUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2011
- Primary completion
- Dec 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 26 Mar 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Cohort study aimed at evaluating the incidence of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction after myocardial infraction (MI) and assessing the prognostic utility of change in ejection fraction (EF) over the initial 12 months after MI.
Detailed description
Background
Patients suffering a myocardial infraction (MI) may have from minimal to extensive myocardial damage. While severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction that persists beyond the initial 2-3 months of an MI is a predictor of sudden death, the prognostic significance of less severe LV dysfunction after MI is unclear.
There is significant clinical value in quantifying LV function after the recovery phase of an MI. This information is vital in guiding the breadth and duration of therapies known to improve prognosis (beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin blockers, anticoagulants, and others). Further, it will identify patients in whom other therapies, such as an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), are recommended. Yet, no guidelines to guide clinical decision making in terms of collecting follow-up ejection fraction (EF) data in such patients who do not also have overt heart failure.
Purpose The Acute Myocardial Infarction Quality Assurance (AMIQA) project proposes to
- document clinical practice by collecting data on the proportion of patients with initial LV dysfunction after MI without a follow-up EF assessment arranged,
- collect follow-up EF data in patients with initial LV dysfunction post-MI and evaluate the prognostic significant of EF early and late after MI as well as factors associated with the change in value, and
- educate physicians regarding the importance of EF reassessment after MI.
Follow up LV assessment
The current guidelines do not clearly provide clear indications to the appropriate timing or modality of follow up left ventricular assessments. We have chosen to define an adequate follow up LV assessment to occur within 2 to 12 months post-myocardial infarction, measured by any modality such as echocardiography, cardiac MRI, or nuclear perfusion scan.
Overall Study Objectives
- To evaluate the relationship of changes in EF after MI with clinical variables such as age, gender, co-morbid conditions, MI characteristics, and the prescription of pharmacological agents after MI.
- To assess the relationship of changes in EF after MI with clinical outcomes.
Study Methodology and Data Collection
This study will be conducted in three phases:
- determining the existing practice of assessing left ventricular ejection fraction following myocardial infarction within the Calgary region (Quality Assurance);
- determining the factors associated with LVEF improvement, stability and decline post-MI and the relationship of these with outcome (Prognostic Factor Study);
- educating the clinical community about the importance of follow up LVEF assessments and reporting the findings of this through presentations, educational materials and/or academic publications (Knowledge Dissemination)
Study Population
The study population will include patients presenting with an acute myocardial infarction (NSTEMI or STEMI) undergoing cardiac catheterization at the Foothills Medical Center, who have significant left ventricular impairment upon initial LV assessment as defined as at least:
- At least mod dysfunction (LVEF < 0.40) if no prior history of MIs (i.e. first MI)
- More than mild-moderate dysfunction (LVEF < 0.45) if prior history of MI Exclusion criteria include: patients lost to follow up by their family physician or primary cardiologist, and patients who are deceased who do not have a follow-up EF.
Patients will be identified using the APPROACH (Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (www.approach.org)) database. All patients will have provided written, informed consent as part of their participation in APPROACH.
AMIQA Phase I: Quality Assurance
Part One (Quality Assurance) will include patients with an MI occurring between July 1, 2010 to November 30, 2011 (15 months). The list of patients who have had myocardial infarctions undergoing cardiac catheterization at the Foothills Medical Center between these dates can be obtained through the APPROACH database. For the patients that meet the initial inclusion criteria for significant LV dysfunction post-MI, the study group will determine if a follow up LVEF assessment has been performed within 2 to 12 months post-MI by contacting the patient's family physician and/or primary cardiologist for any records of LVEF measurements, and searching through the following electronic databases.
AMIQA Phase II: Prognostic Factor Study
Part Two (Prognostic Factor Study) will include patients with myocardial infarctions occurring on December 5, 2011 until December 5, 2012 (12 months). The list of patients who have had myocardial infarctions undergoing cardiac catheterization at the Foothills Medical Center between these dates can be obtained through the APPROACH database. For the patients that meet the initial inclusion criteria for significant LV dysfunction post-MI (as described in section 5.1), the study group will contact the patient, the patient's family physician, and/or patient's primary cardiologist to order a follow up LVEF measurement within 2 to 12 months post- myocardial infarction. That is, all patients that have significant LV dysfunction will undergo follow up LVEF measurements between December 5, 2011 and December 5, 2012. Modalities for follow up LVEF measurements will include echocardiogram, cardiac MRI, and nuclear perfusion imaging at the discretion of the family physician or primary cardiologist.
These follow up LVEF measurements will be entered into the APPROACH database in order to allow us to evaluate the clinical significance of changes in EF after MI and prognostic significance of initial versus follow-up EF values.
Data Analysis
AMIQA Phase I: Quality Assurance
Data collected will be entered into a database and summary statistics will be created (e.g. proportion of follow up LVEF assessments completed post-MI (Aim 5.1), choice of modality for follow up LVEF assessment, etc.) Data collected from the surveys will be entered into a database and analyzed in SAS or Stata. Summary statistics will be created from the data collected in the surveys.
Acute Myocardial Infarction Quality Assurance (AMIQA) Project Research Protocol - Updated Feb 29, 2012
AMIQA Phase II: Prognostic Factor Study
As part of AMIQA Phase II, LVEF assessments will be entered into the APPROACH database. The study will compare initial LVEF measurements post-MI to follow-up LVEF measurements, and assess for improvement, stability and deterioration of LVEF and the factors associated with these changes in LVEF.
This project has received ethics approval by the Conjoint Health Research and Ethics Board of the University of Calgary. Patients will be identified using the APPROACH database have provided written, informed consent as part of their participation in APPROACH. Only the research team will know the names and contact information of the patients included in the study, and this information will be kept confidential.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 2 Years
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Retrospective | – | Other: Standard of CareMI prior to December 11, 2011 |
| Prospective | – | Other: Quality Assurance ImplementationMI on or after December 11, 2011 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients surviving an acute MI.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- confirmed MI
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- None
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Quality Assurance Implementation | Other | Prospective |
| Standard of Care | Other | Retrospective |
Primary outcome
Mortality
Time frame: 2 years
2 secondary outcomes
Ejection Fraction
Time frame: 12 months
Heart Failure Hospitalization
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Jun 2016.
Related trials for Myocardial Infarction
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Roxadustat and Myocardial Injury After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Active, not recruitingObservational study
A Longitudinal Cohort Study to Evaluate Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Disease in Haiti
Hypertension, Diabetes
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Inclisiran to Prevent Cardiovascular Events in High-risk Primary Prevention Patients.
Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease
Enrolling by invitation
The DANE-HEART Trial - Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography for Primary Prevention
Coronary Atherosclerosis and Other Heart Disease, Cardiovascular Diseases
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Elicit Drugs in Myocardial Infarction
Young Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Derek V Exner, MD, MPH principal investigator
University of Calgary
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Myocardial Infarction and Death, run by Dr. Derek Exner at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jun 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Derek S Chew, MD (4032203219, dchew@ucalgary.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mortality (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jun 2016.