Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial and SeasonalPhase 4NCT02397915
Patient Preference Study of Fluticasone Furoate and Mometasone Furoate Nasal Sprays
A Phase 4 study testing FF nasal spray and MF nasal spray in people with Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial and Seasonal, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 12 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to provide information on whether subjects with allergic rhinitis (AR) prefer the administration of fluticasone furoate (FF) nasal spray or mometasone furoate (MF) nasal spray based on how the products feel to the subjects when administered. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial and Seasonal
- What is being tested?
- FF nasal spray and MF nasal spray
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- 12 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- 26 Mar 2015to 8 Jun 2015
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female subjects who are between 18 to 65 years of age, inclusive at the time of signing the informed consent.
- Severity of disease: Subjects who meet the below criteria and who may also have vasomotor rhinitis are eligible for the study. A positive skin test to perennial (for example, but not limited to, animal dander, house dust mites, cockroach, mould) and / or seasonal (for example, but not limited to, grass, tree, weed, ragweed) allergen within 12 months prior to Screening. If a subject has not been tested in the 12 months prior to Screening, a positive skin test (by prick method) is required at Screening. A positive skin test is defined as a wheal >=3 millimeters (mm) larger than the diluent control for prick testing. In vitro tests for specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) [such as radioallergosorbent test (RAST), paper radioimmunosorbent test (PRIST)] will not be allowed as a diagnosis of AR.
- A female subject is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant [as confirmed by a negative urine (preferred) or serum human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) test], not lactating, and at least one of the following conditions applies: (a) Non-reproductive potential defined as premenopausal females with a documented tubal ligation or documented hysteroscopic tubal occlusion procedure with follow-up confirmation of bilateral tubal occlusion or hysterectomy or documented bilateral oophorectomy; or postmenopausal defined as 12 months of spontaneous amenorrhea. Females on hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and whose menopausal status is in doubt will be required to use one of the highly effective contraception methods if they wish to continue their HRT during the study. Otherwise, they must discontinue HRT to allow confirmation of post-menopausal status prior to study enrolment. (b) Reproductive potential and agrees to follow one of the options listed below in the GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) modified list of highly effective methods for avoiding pregnancy in females of reproductive potential (FRP) requirements from 30 days prior to the first dose of study medication and until at least 4 days after the last dose of study medication. The GSK modified list of highly effective methods includes: contraceptive subdermal implant that meets the standard operating procedure (SOP) effectiveness criteria including a <1% rate of failure per year, as stated in the product label; Intrauterine device or intrauterine system that meets the SOP effectiveness criteria including a <1% rate of failure per year, as stated in the product label; Oral contraceptive; either combined or progestogen alone; Injectable progestogen; Contraceptive vaginal ring; Percutaneous contraceptive patches; Male partner sterilization with documentation of azoospermia prior to the female subject's entry into the study, and this male is the sole partner for that subject. This list does not apply to FRP with same sex partners, when this is their preferred and usual lifestyle or for subjects who are and will continue to be abstinent from penile-vaginal intercourse on a long term and persistent basis.
- A male subject is eligible to participate if (a) subjects with female partners of child bearing potential comply with the following contraception requirements from the time of first dose of study medication until at least 4 days after the last dose of study medication; (b) Vasectomy with documentation of azoospermia; (c) Male condom plus partner use of one of the contraceptive options: Contraceptive subdermal implant that meets the SOP effectiveness criteria including a <1% rate of failure per year, as stated in the product label; Intrauterine device or intrauterine system that meets the SOP effectiveness criteria including a <1% rate of failure per year, as stated in the product label; Oral contraceptive, either combined or progestogen alone, Injectable progestogen; Contraceptive vaginal ring; Percutaneous contraceptive patches. These allowed methods of contraception are only effective when used consistently, correctly and in accordance with the product label. The investigator is responsible for ensuring that subjects understand how to properly use these methods of contraception.
- Understanding of questionnaires: In the opinion of the investigator, subject possesses a degree of understanding of the written questionnaires that enables the subject to complete study participation.
- Informed consent: Capable of giving signed informed consent which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the consent form and in the protocol.
Who cannot join
- Concurrent conditions / Medical History: Concomitant medical conditions defined as but not limited to a historical or current evidence of clinically significant uncontrolled disease of any body system (e.g., tuberculosis, psychological disorders, eczema, uncontrolled diabetes, immunosuppression). Significant is defined as any disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, would put the safety of the subject at risk through study participation, or compromise the scientific validity of the study; A respiratory infection at time of study participation; A condition associated with anosmia (loss of smell) and ageusia (loss of taste) within 2 weeks of study - may be self-reported condition experienced by the subject; Clinical evidence of a Candida infection of the nose or oropharynx; Acute rhinosinusitis within 60 days of screening; Current severe physical obstruction of the nose (e.g., deviated septum or nasal polyp) or nasal septal perforation or nasal trauma or nasal ulcers; History of haemorrhagic diathesis, atrophic rhinitis, or recurrent nasal bleeding which may, in the opinion of the investigator, impact on the safety of the subject or the scientific validity of the study; Nasal biopsy within 60 days of screening; Nasal jewellery or piercings which could impact nasal safety or airway resistance; Rhinitis medicamentosa within 60 days of screening; History of glaucoma, cataracts or raised intraocular pressure.
- Concomitant medications: Use of intranasal corticosteroids (FF, MF or others) within 4 weeks of study participation; Recent or ongoing use of a corticosteroid by a non-nasal route which, in the opinion of the investigator, could preclude subject participation in the study; Use of intranasal medications (including intranasal antihistamines, intranasal decongestants, intranasal saline) within 1 week of study participation; Use of medications which, in the opinion of the investigator, could disturb the taste or smell faculties of the subject; Use of any medications that significantly inhibit the cytochrome P450 (CYP) sub-family CYP3A4, including but not limited to ritonavir and ketoconazole, within 4 weeks of study participation.
- Relevant habits: Use of perfume or strong-smelling cosmetic products or oral rinse or similar products on the study day that could, in the opinion of the investigator, compromise participation in the study. Subjects should be notified of this criterion prior to study participation; Use of tobacco, or inhaled or oral nicotine-containing products, is not allowed for 12 hours prior to the start of dosing.
- Contraindications: History of sensitivity to any of the study procedures or medications, or components thereof, or a history of drug or other allergy that, in the opinion of the investigator or Medical Monitor, contraindicates their participation.
- Diagnostic assessments and other criteria: Positive pregnancy test or female who is breastfeeding; The subject has participated in a clinical trial and has received an investigational product within the following time period prior to the first dosing day in the current study: 30 days, 5 half-lives or twice the duration of the biological effect of the investigational product (whichever is longer), unless more stringent local guidelines need to be followed.
Trial locations and contacts
12 sites in 4 countries.
12 sites in 4 countries
Argentina4 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Buenos Aires, C1425BEN
GSK Investigational Site
Buenos Aires, C1426ABP
GSK Investigational Site
Mendoza, 5500
GSK Investigational Site
Mendoza, M5500CCG
Australia3 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, 2450
GSK Investigational Site
Maroubra, New South Wales, 2035
GSK Investigational Site
Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150
South Korea3 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Incheon, 405-760
GSK Investigational Site
Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 463-707
GSK Investigational Site
Seoul, 08308
Russia2 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Moscow, 123182
GSK Investigational Site
Stavropol, 355030
About this study
Official title: A Patient Preference Evaluation Study of Fluticasone Furoate Nasal Spray and Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray in Subjects With Allergic Rhinitis
The purpose of this study is to provide information on whether subjects with allergic rhinitis (AR) prefer the administration of fluticasone furoate (FF) nasal spray or mometasone furoate (MF) nasal spray based on how the products feel to the subjects when administered.
This Phase IV interventional study is a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, single-dose, cross-over subject preference study to evaluate and compare patient preference for FF [(total dose of 110 microgram (mcg)] and MF (total dose of 200 mcg) nasal sprays in subjects with allergic rhinitis. These two commonly used nasal sprays use different actuation systems (FF nasal spray is side-actuated; MF nasal spray is top-actuated) and this study will evaluate whether this difference is reflected in the patient-assessed attributes of the two nasal sprays. The attributes or properties which are being assessed by the subjects for these nasal sprays include smell, taste \& aftertaste, drip down the throat, run out of the nose, urge to sneeze, and irritation.
Read more
The single-day study per subject comprises screening and all treatments and procedures. Eligible subjects will be randomized 1:1 to a cross-over treatment schedule so that all subjects receive both products. One group of subjects will have two sprays of FF administered in each nostril whilst a second group will have two sprays of MF administered into each nostril. At 30 (± 5) minutes after the first study medication treatment, the two groups will switch. The first group will then have two sprays of MF administered into each nostril and the second group will then have two sprays of FF administered into each nostril. After each treatment the subject will complete two sets of attributes questionnaires ('immediate' and 'delayed'). A subject-rated 'immediate' attributes questionnaire will be completed immediately following each treatment and a subject-rated 'delayed' attributes questionnaire will be completed approximately 2 minutes after each treatment. Upon completion of the second set of these two attributes questionnaires (immediate and delayed), a preference questionnaire will be completed by the subject. In the preference questionnaire, the subject states their preferred treatment, if any, for each of the product attributes, and finally states their overall preferred treatment, if any.
There will be follow-up contact with the subject 24 (± 4) and 96 (± 4) hours after administration of the last treatment. The study is planned to enroll about 300 subjects.
- Being tested
- FF nasal spray, MF nasal spray
- Keywords
- Nasal Spray, Fluticasone Furoate, Attributes, Single Dose, Allergic Rhinitis, Mometasone Furoate, Questionnaire, Preference
- Medical subject headings
- Rhinitis, Rhinitis, Allergic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
FF nasal sprayDrug
FF as a suspension for intranasal inhalation with unit dose strength of 27.5 mcg per dose x 4 doses (total dose 110 mcg) administered via a metered side-actuated nasal spray device.
MF nasal sprayDrug
MF as a suspension for intranasal inhalation with unit dose strength of 50 mcg per dose x 4 doses (total dose 200 mcg) administered via a metered top-actuated nasal spray device.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Fluticasone Furoate | Experimental | Subjects will receive a single dose of intranasal FF (total dose of 110 mcg) as 2 sprays per nostril / 4 sprays in total. Receives: Drug: FF nasal spray |
| Mometasone Furoate | Experimental | Subjects will receive a single dose of intranasal MF (total dose of 200 mcg) nasal spray as 2 sprays per nostril / 4 sprays in total. Receives: Drug: MF nasal spray |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Overall Preference for Nasal Spray Assessed by Preference Questionnaire.
An overall preference questionnaire (OPQ) was used to evaluate participants' preference for nasal spray therapy for the given treatments. OPQ allows the responder three options, based on products attributes, i.e. preference for product 1; preference for product 2 and no preference. The OPQ was completed by each participant approximately 4 minutes after administration of the second treatment in Period 2. Overall participant preferences were analyzed using Prescott's test, as approximated by a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test, adjusted for country and symptomatology. All preference p-values were also adjusted for multiplicity using Hochberg's method.
Measured: Approximately four minutes after the administration of the second treatment
Secondary outcomes (22)
Number of Participants With Preference for Individual Nasal Spray Attributes Assessed by Preference Questionnaire
An overall preference questionnaire (OPQ) was used to evaluate participants' attribute preference for nasal spray therapy for the given treatment. OPQ allows the responder three options, based on products attributes, i.e. preference for product 1; preference for product 2 and no preference. Products attributes included scent/odor, immediate taste, after taste, less drip through throat (LDTT), less run out of nose (LRON), more soothing, less irritating and urge to sneeze (UTS). The OPQ was completed by each participant approximately 4 minutes after administration of the second treatment (tmt) in Period 2. Overall participant preferences were analyzed using Prescott's test, as approximated by a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test, adjusted for country (ctry) and symptomatology (sym). All preference p-values were also adjusted for multiplicity using Hochberg's method.
Measured: Approximately four minutes after the administration of the second treatment
Number of Participants Responding to the Immediate Attributes Question Regarding Scent/Odor
Immediate attributes questionnaire was used to evaluate immediate ratings of participant for individual attributes of FF and MF nasal spray. Number of participants responding to product attributes i.e. scent/odor, using immediate attributes questionnaire, Question 1, "Did product have a scent/odor?" are summarized. The immediate attributes questionnaire was completed immediately following each treatment in Period 1 and 2. Participants specified their responses on a 6-point scale: 0: none; 1: very mild; 2: mild; 3: neither mild nor strong; 4: slightly strong; 5; moderately strong; 6: very strong. Immediate attribute ratings were analyzed using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) mixed model with participant as a random effect, and country, treatment, period, and Baseline (BL) rhinitis symptomatology subgroup (subgrp), and treatment sequence as main effects. P-values associated with tests of immediate attribute rating scores were adjusted for multiplicity using Hochberg's method.
Measured: Immediately following each treatment in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Immediate Attributes Question Regarding Satisfaction With Scent/Odor
Immediate attributes questionnaire (ques) was used to evaluate immediate ratings of par. for individual attributes of FF and MF nasal spray. Number of par. responding to product attributes i.e. scent/odor, using immediate attributes ques, Question 2, "How satisfied with scent/odor?" are summarized. The immediate' attributes ques was completed immediately following each treatment (trt) in Period 1 and 2. Par. specified their responses on a 6-point scale: 0: very satisfied; 1: moderately satisfied; 2: somewhat satisfied; 3: neither satisfied nor dissatisfied; 4: somewhat dissatisfied; 5; moderately dissatisfied; 6: very dissatisfied. Immediate attribute ratings were analyzed using an analysis of variance mixed model with par. as a random effect, and country, trt, period, and BL rhinitis symptomatology subgroup, and trt sequence as main effects. P-values associated with tests of immediate attribute rating scores were adjusted for multiplicity using Hochberg's method.
Measured: Immediately following each treatment in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Immediate Attributes Question Regarding Satisfaction Not to Have Scent/Odor
Immediate attributes questionnaire was used to evaluate immediate ratings of par. for individual attributes of FF and MF nasal spray. Number of par. responding to product attributes i.e. scent/odor, using immediate attributes questionnaire, Question 3, "How satisfied not to have scent/odor?" are summarized. The immediate' attributes questionnaire was completed immediately following each trt in Period 1 and 2. Par. specified their responses on a 6-point scale: 0: very satisfied; 1: moderately satisfied; 2: somewhat satisfied; 3: neither satisfied nor dissatisfied; 4: somewhat dissatisfied; 5; moderately dissatisfied; 6: very dissatisfied. Immediate attribute ratings were analyzed using an analysis of variance mixed model with par. as a random effect, and country, trt, period, and BL rhinitis symptomatology subgroup, and trt sequence as main effects. P-values associated with tests of immediate attribute rating scores were adjusted for multiplicity using Hochberg's method.
Measured: Immediately following each treatment in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Immediate Attributes Question Regarding Immediate Taste.
Immediate attributes questionnaire was used to evaluate immediate ratings of participant for individual attributes of FF and MF nasal spray. Number of participants responding to product attributes i.e. taste, using immediate attributes questionnaire, Question 4, "Did product have an immediate taste?" are summarized. The immediate attributes questionnaire was completed immediately following each treatment in Period 1 and 2. Participants specified their responses on a 6-point scale: 0: no; 1: very mild; 2: mild; 3: neither mild nor strong; 4: slightly strong; 5; moderately strong; 6: very strong. Immediate attribute ratings were analyzed using an analysis of variance mixed model with participant as a random effect, and country, treatment, period, and Baseline rhinitis symptomatology subgroup, and treatment sequence as main effects. P-values associated with tests of immediate attribute rating scores were adjusted for multiplicity using Hochberg's method.
Measured: Immediately following each treatment in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Immediate Attributes Question Regarding Satisfaction With Immediate Taste.
Immediate attributes questionnaire was used to evaluate immediate ratings of par. for individual attributes of FF and MF nasal spray. Number of par. responding to product attributes i.e. taste, using immediate attributes questionnaire, Question 5, "How satisfied with immediate taste?" are summarized. The immediate attributes questionnaire was completed immediately following each treatment in Period 1 and 2. Par. specified their responses on a 6-point scale: 0: very satisfied; 1: moderately satisfied; 2: somewhat satisfied; 3: neither satisfied nor dissatisfied; 4: somewhat dissatisfied; 5; moderately dissatisfied; 6: very dissatisfied. Immediate attribute ratings were analyzed using an analysis of variance mixed model with par. as a random effect, and country, treatment, period, and BL rhinitis symptomatology subgroup, and treatment sequence as main effects. P-values associated with tests of immediate attribute rating scores were adjusted for multiplicity using Hochberg's method.
Measured: Immediately following each treatment in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Immediate Attributes Question Regarding Medicine Running Down Throat
Immediate attributes questionnaire was used to evaluate immediate ratings of participant for individual attributes of FF and MF nasal spray. Number of participants responding to product attributes using immediate attributes questionnaire, Question 6, "Did medicine run down throat?" are summarized. The immediate attributes questionnaire was completed immediately following each treatment in Period 1 and 2. Participants specified their responses on a 6-point scale: 0: none; 1: very slightly; 2: slightly; 3: neither slightly nor moderately; 4: moderately; 5; markedly; 6: very markedly. Immediate attribute ratings were analyzed using an analysis of variance mixed model with participant as a random effect, and country, treatment, period, and Baseline rhinitis symptomatology subgroup, and treatment sequence as main effects. P-values associated with tests of immediate attribute rating scores were adjusted for multiplicity using Hochberg's method.
Measured: Immediately following each treatment in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Immediate Attributes Question Regarding Medicine Running Out of Nose.
Immediate attributes questionnaire was used to evaluate immediate ratings of participant for individual attributes of FF and MF nasal spray. Number of participants responding to product attributes using immediate attributes questionnaire, Question 7, "Did medicine run out of nose?" are summarized. The immediate attributes questionnaire was completed immediately following each treatment in Period 1 and 2. Participants specified their responses on a 6-point scale: 0: none; 1: very slightly; 2: slightly; 3: neither slightly nor moderately; 4: moderately; 5; markedly; 6: very markedly. Immediate attribute ratings were analyzed using an analysis of variance mixed model with participant as a random effect, and country, treatment, period, and Baseline rhinitis symptomatology subgroup, and treatment sequence as main effects. P-values associated with tests of immediate attribute rating scores were adjusted for multiplicity using Hochberg's method.
Measured: Immediately following each treatment in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Immediate Attributes Question Regarding Soothing
Immediate attributes questionnaire was used to evaluate immediate ratings of participant for individual attributes of FF and MF nasal spray. Number of participants responding to product attributes using immediate attributes questionnaire, Question 8, "Did product feel soothing?" are summarized. The immediate attributes questionnaire was completed immediately following each treatment in Period 1 and 2. Participants specified their responses on a 6-point scale: 0: none; 1: very slightly; 2: slightly; 3: neither slightly nor moderately; 4: moderately; 5; markedly; 6: very markedly. Immediate attribute ratings were analyzed using an analysis of variance mixed model with participant as a random effect, and country, treatment, period, and Baseline rhinitis symptomatology subgroup, and treatment sequence as main effects. P-values associated with tests of immediate attribute rating scores were adjusted for multiplicity using Hochberg's method.
Measured: Immediately following each treatment in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Immediate Attributes Question Regarding Sneezing
Immediate attributes questionnaire was used to evaluate immediate ratings of par. for individual attributes of FF and MF nasal spray. Number of par. responding to product attributes using immediate attributes questionnaire, Question 9, "Did product make want to sneeze?" are summarized. The immediate attributes questionnaire was completed immediately following each treatment in Period 1 and 2. Participants specified their responses on a 6-point scale: 0: no urgency; 1: very slightly urgency; 2: slightly urgency; 3: neither slightly nor moderately urgency; 4: moderately urgency; 5; markedly urgency; 6: very markedly urgency. Immediate attribute ratings were analyzed using an analysis of variance mixed model with par. as a random effect, and country, treatment, period, and BL rhinitis symptomatology subgroup, and treatment sequence as main effects. P-values associated with tests of immediate attribute rating scores were adjusted for multiplicity using Hochberg's method.
Measured: Immediately following each treatment in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Delayed Attributes Question Regarding Scent/Odor.
Delayed attributes questionnaire was used to evaluate immediate ratings of participant for individual attributes of FF and MF nasal spray. Number of participants responding to product attributes i.e. scent/odor, using delayed attributes questionnaire, Question 1, "Did product have a scent/odor?" are summarized. The delayed attributes questionnaire was completed 2 minutes after dosing, in Period 1 and 2. Participants specified their responses on a 6-point scale: 0: none; 1: very mild; 2: mild; 3: neither mild nor strong; 4: slightly strong; 5; moderately strong; 6: very strong. Delayed attribute ratings were analyzed using an analysis of variance mixed model with participant as a random effect, and country, treatment, period, and Baseline rhinitis symptomatology subgroup, and treatment sequence as main effects. P-values associated with tests of delayed attribute rating scores were adjusted for multiplicity using Hochberg's method.
Measured: Approximatly two minutes after the dosing in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Delayed Attributes Question Regarding Satisfaction With Scent/Odor.
Delayed attributes questionnaire was used to evaluate delayed ratings of par. for individual attributes of FF and MF nasal spray. Number of par. responding to product attributes i.e. scent/odor, using delayed attributes questionnaire, Question 2, "How satisfied with scent/odor?" are summarized. The delayed attributes questionnaire was completed 2 minutes after dosing, in Period 1 and 2. Par. specified their responses on a 6-point scale: 0: very satisfied; 1: moderately satisfied; 2: somewhat satisfied; 3: neither satisfied nor dissatisfied; 4: somewhat dissatisfied; 5; moderately dissatisfied; 6: very dissatisfied. Delayed attribute ratings were analyzed using an analysis of variance mixed model with par. as a random effect, and country, treatment, period, and Baseline rhinitis symptomatology subgroup, and treatment sequence as main effects. P-values associated with tests of delayed attribute rating scores were adjusted for multiplicity using Hochberg's method.
Measured: Approximatly two minutes after the dosing in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Delayed Attributes Question Regarding Satisfaction Not to Have Scent/Odor.
Delayed attributes questionnaire was used to evaluate delayed ratings of par. for individual attributes of FF and MF nasal spray. Number of par. responding to product attributes i.e. scent/odor, using delayed attributes questionnaire, Question 3, "How satisfied not to have scent/odor?" are summarized. The delayed attributes questionnaire was completed 2 minutes after dosing, in Period 1 and 2. Par. specified their responses on a 6-point scale: 0: very satisfied; 1: moderately satisfied; 2: somewhat satisfied; 3: neither satisfied nor dissatisfied; 4: somewhat dissatisfied; 5; moderately dissatisfied; 6: very dissatisfied. Delayed attribute ratings were analyzed using an analysis of variance mixed model with par. as a random effect, and country, treatment, period, and Baseline rhinitis symptomatology subgroup, and treatment sequence as main effects. P-values associated with tests of delayed attribute rating scores were adjusted for multiplicity using Hochberg's method.
Measured: Approximatly two minutes after the dosing in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Delayed Attributes Question Regarding Aftertaste.
Delayed attributes questionnaire was used to evaluate delayed ratings of participant for individual attributes of FF and MF nasal spray. Number of participants responding to product attributes i.e. taste, using delayed attributes questionnaire, Question 4, "Did product have an aftertaste?" are summarized. The delayed attributes questionnaire was completed 2 minutes after dosing, in Period 1 and 2. Participants specified their responses on a 6-point scale: 0: no; 1: very mild; 2: mild; 3: neither mild nor strong; 4: slightly strong; 5; moderately strong; 6: very strong. Immediate attribute ratings were analyzed using an analysis of variance mixed model with participant as a random effect, and country, treatment, period, and Baseline rhinitis symptomatology subgroup, and treatment sequence as main effects. P-values associated with tests of delayed attribute rating scores were adjusted for multiplicity using Hochberg's method.
Measured: Approximatly two minutes after the dosing in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Delayed Attributes Question Regarding Satisfaction With Aftertaste.
Delayed attributes questionnaire was used to evaluate delayed ratings of par. for individual attributes of FF and MF nasal spray. Number of par. responding to product attributes i.e. taste, using delayed attributes questionnaire, Question 5, "How satisfied with aftertaste?" are summarized. The delayed attributes questionnaire was completed 2 minutes after dosing, in Period 1 and 2. Par. specified their responses on a 6-point scale: 0: very satisfied; 1: moderately satisfied; 2: somewhat satisfied; 3: neither satisfied nor dissatisfied; 4: somewhat dissatisfied; 5; moderately dissatisfied; 6: very dissatisfied. Delayed attribute ratings were analyzed using an analysis of variance mixed model with par. as a random effect, and country, treatment, period, and BL rhinitis symptomatology subgroup, and treatment sequence as main effects. P-values associated with tests of delayed attribute rating scores were adjusted for multiplicity using Hochberg's method.
Measured: Approximatly two minutes after the dosing in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Delayed Attributes Question Regarding Medicine Running Down Throat.
Delayed attributes questionnaire was used to evaluate delayed ratings of participant for individual attributes of FF and MF nasal spray. Number of participants responding to product attributes using delayed attributes questionnaire, Question 6, "Did medicine run down throat?" are summarized. The delayed attributes questionnaire was completed 2 minutes after dosing, in Period 1 and 2. Participants specified their responses on a 6-point scale: 0: none; 1: very slightly; 2: slightly; 3: neither slightly nor moderately; 4: moderately; 5; markedly; 6: very markedly. Delayed attribute ratings were analyzed using an analysis of variance mixed model with participant as a random effect, and country, treatment, period, and Baseline rhinitis symptomatology subgroup, and treatment sequence as main effects. P-values associated with tests of delayed attribute rating scores were adjusted for multiplicity using Hochberg's method.
Measured: Approximatly two minutes after the dosing in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Delayed Attributes Question Regarding Smedicine Running Out of Nose.
Delayed attributes questionnaire was used to evaluate delayed ratings of participant for individual attributes of FF and MF nasal spray. Number of participants responding to product attributes using delayed attributes questionnaire, Question 7, "Did medicine run out of nose?" are summarized. The delayed attributes questionnaire was completed 2 minutes after dosing, in Period 1 and 2. Participants specified their responses on a 6-point scale: 0: none; 1: very slightly; 2: slightly; 3: neither slightly nor moderately; 4: moderately; 5; markedly; 6: very markedly. Delayed attribute ratings were analyzed using an analysis of variance mixed model with participant as a random effect, and country, treatment, period, and Baseline rhinitis symptomatology subgroup, and treatment sequence as main effects. P-values associated with tests of delayed attribute rating scores were adjusted for multiplicity using Hochberg's method.
Measured: Approximatly two minutes after the dosing in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Delayed Attributes Question Regarding Soothing.
Delayed attributes questionnaire was used to evaluate delayed ratings of participant for individual attributes of FF and MF nasal spray. Number of participants responding to product attributes using delayed attributes questionnaire, Question 8, "Did product feel soothing?" are summarized. The delayed attributes questionnaire was completed 2 minutes after dosing, in Period 1 and 2. Participants specified their responses on a 6-point scale: 0: none; 1: very slightly; 2: slightly; 3: neither slightly nor moderately; 4: moderately; 5; markedly; 6: very markedly. Delayed attribute ratings were analyzed using an analysis of variance mixed model with participant as a random effect, and country, treatment, period, and Baseline rhinitis symptomatology subgroup, and treatment sequence as main effects. P-values associated with tests of delayed attribute rating scores were adjusted for multiplicity using Hochberg's method.
Measured: Approximatly two minutes after the dosing in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Delayed Attributes Question Regarding Nasal Irritation.
Delayed attributes questionnaire was used to evaluate delayed ratings of participant for individual attributes of FF and MF nasal spray. Number of participants responding to product attributes using delayed attributes questionnaire, Question 9, "Did product cause nasal irritation?" are summarized. The delayed attributes questionnaire was completed 2 minutes after dosing, in Period 1 and 2. Participants specified their responses on a 6-point scale: 0: no; 1: very slightly; 2: slightly; 3: neither slightly nor moderately; 4: moderately; 5; markedly; 6: very markedly. Delayed attribute ratings were analyzed using an analysis of variance mixed model with participant as a random effect, and country, treatment, period, and Baseline rhinitis symptomatology subgroup, and treatment sequence as main effects. P-values associated with tests of delayed attribute rating scores were adjusted for multiplicity using Hochberg's method.
Measured: Approximatly two minutes after the dosing in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Delayed Attributes Question Regarding Bothersome Nasal Irritation.
Delayed attributes questionnaire was used to evaluate delayed ratings of participant for individual attributes of FF and MF nasal spray. Number of participants responding to product attributes using delayed attributes questionnaire, Question 10, "How bothersome was nasal irritation?" are summarized. The delayed attributes questionnaire was completed 2 minutes after dosing, in Period 1 and 2. Participants specified their responses on a 6-point scale: 0: none; 1: very slightly; 2: slightly; 3: neither slightly nor moderately; 4: moderately; 5; markedly; 6: very markedly. Delayed attribute ratings were analyzed using an analysis of variance mixed model with participant as a random effect, and country, treatment, period, and Baseline rhinitis symptomatology subgroup, and treatment sequence as main effects. P-values associated with tests of delayed attribute rating scores were adjusted for multiplicity using Hochberg's method.
Measured: Approximatly two minutes after the dosing in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Delayed Attributes Question Regarding Satisfaction With Product.
Delayed attributes questionnaire was used to evaluate delayed ratings of participant for individual attributes of FF and MF nasal spray. Number of participants responding to product attributes i.e. taste, using delayed attributes questionnaire, Question 11, "How satisfied with product?" are summarized. The delayed attributes questionnaire was completed 2 minutes after dosing, in Period 1 and 2. Participants specified their responses on a 6-point scale: 0: very satisfied; 1: moderately satisfied; 2: somewhat satisfied; 3: neither satisfied nor dissatisfied; 4: somewhat dissatisfied; 5; moderately dissatisfied; 6: very dissatisfied. Delayed attribute ratings were analyzed using an analysis of variance mixed model with participant as a random effect, and country, treatment, period, and Baseline rhinitis symptomatology subgroup, and treatment sequence as main effects. P-values associated with tests of delayed attribute rating scores were adjusted for multiplicity using Hochberg's method.
Measured: Approximatly two minutes after the dosing in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Delayed Attributes Question Regarding Likeliness to Comply if Prescribed
Delayed attributes questionnaire was used to evaluate delayed ratings of par. for individual attributes of FF and MF nasal spray. Number of par. responding to product attributes i.e. taste, using delayed attributes questionnaire, Question 12, "How likely to comply if prescribed?" are summarized. The delayed attributes questionnaire was completed 2 minutes after dosing, in Period 1 and 2. Par. specified their responses on a 6-point scale: 0: very likely; 1: moderately likely; 2: somewhat likely; 3: neither likely nor unlikely; 4: somewhat unlikely; 5; moderately unlikely; 6: very unlikely. Delayed attribute ratings were analyzed using an analysis of variance mixed model with participant as a random effect, and country, treatment, period, and Baseline rhinitis symptomatology subgroup, and treatment sequence as main effects. P-values associated with tests of delayed attribute rating scores were adjusted for multiplicity using Hochberg's method.
Measured: Approximatly two minutes after the dosing in Period 1 and 2
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Mar 2015 (estimated)
- Study start26 Mar 2015
- Primary completion8 Jun 2015
- Study completion8 Jun 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial and SeasonalStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by GlaxoSmithKlineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02397915
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 201474
- Status last verified
- Dec 2017
- First submitted
- 19 Mar 2015
- Last updated
- 9 Jan 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Publications
Meltzer EO, Bardelas J, Goldsobel A, Kaiser H. A preference evaluation study comparing the sensory attributes of mometasone furoate and fluticasone propionate nasal sprays by patients with allergic rhinitis. Treat Respir Med. 2005;4(4):289-96. doi: 10.2165/00151829-200504040-00007.
PubMed 16086602Meltzer EO, Stahlman JE, Leflein J, Meltzer S, Lim J, Dalal AA, Prillaman BA, Philpot EE. Preferences of adult patients with allergic rhinitis for the sensory attributes of fluticasone furoate versus fluticasone propionate nasal sprays: a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, single-dose, crossover study. Clin Ther. 2008 Feb;30(2):271-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.02.005.
PubMed 18343265Sher ER, Ross JA. Intranasal corticosteroids: the role of patient preference and satisfaction. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2014 Jan-Feb;35(1):24-33. doi: 10.2500/aap.2014.35.3725.
PubMed 24433594
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Jan 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Patient Preference Evaluation Study of Fluticasone Furoate Nasal Spray and Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray in Subjects With Allergic Rhinitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02397915
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 201474
- Keywords
- Nasal Spray, Fluticasone Furoate, Attributes, Single Dose, Allergic Rhinitis, Mometasone Furoate, Questionnaire, Preference
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKlineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 26 Mar 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 8 Jun 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- 8 Jun 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Mar 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 29 Feb 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to provide information on whether subjects with allergic rhinitis (AR) prefer the administration of fluticasone furoate (FF) nasal spray or mometasone furoate (MF) nasal spray based on how the products feel to the subjects when administered.
This Phase IV interventional study is a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, single-dose, cross-over subject preference study to evaluate and compare patient preference for FF [(total dose of 110 microgram (mcg)] and MF (total dose of 200 mcg) nasal sprays in subjects with allergic rhinitis. These two commonly used nasal sprays use different actuation systems (FF nasal spray is side-actuated; MF nasal spray is top-actuated) and this study will evaluate whether this difference is reflected in the patient-assessed attributes of the two nasal sprays. The attributes or properties which are being assessed by the subjects for these nasal sprays include smell, taste \& aftertaste, drip down the throat, run out of the nose, urge to sneeze, and irritation.
The single-day study per subject comprises screening and all treatments and procedures. Eligible subjects will be randomized 1:1 to a cross-over treatment schedule so that all subjects receive both products. One group of subjects will have two sprays of FF administered in each nostril whilst a second group will have two sprays of MF administered into each nostril. At 30 (± 5) minutes after the first study medication treatment, the two groups will switch. The first group will then have two sprays of MF administered into each nostril and the second group will then have two sprays of FF administered into each nostril. After each treatment the subject will complete two sets of attributes questionnaires ('immediate' and 'delayed'). A subject-rated 'immediate' attributes questionnaire will be completed immediately following each treatment and a subject-rated 'delayed' attributes questionnaire will be completed approximately 2 minutes after each treatment. Upon completion of the second set of these two attributes questionnaires (immediate and delayed), a preference questionnaire will be completed by the subject. In the preference questionnaire, the subject states their preferred treatment, if any, for each of the product attributes, and finally states their overall preferred treatment, if any.
There will be follow-up contact with the subject 24 (± 4) and 96 (± 4) hours after administration of the last treatment. The study is planned to enroll about 300 subjects.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Fluticasone Furoate | Experimental | Drug: FF nasal spraySubjects will receive a single dose of intranasal FF (total dose of 110 mcg) as 2 sprays per nostril / 4 sprays in total. |
| Mometasone Furoate | Experimental | Drug: MF nasal spraySubjects will receive a single dose of intranasal MF (total dose of 200 mcg) nasal spray as 2 sprays per nostril / 4 sprays in total. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Male or female subjects who are between 18 to 65 years of age, inclusive at the time of signing the informed consent.
- Severity of disease: Subjects who meet the below criteria and who may also have vasomotor rhinitis are eligible for the study. A positive skin test to perennial (for example, but not limited to, animal dander, house dust mites, cockroach, mould) and / or seasonal (for example, but not limited to, grass, tree, weed, ragweed) allergen within 12 months prior to Screening. If a subject has not been tested in the 12 months prior to Screening, a positive skin test (by prick method) is required at Screening. A positive skin test is defined as a wheal >=3 millimeters (mm) larger than the diluent control for prick testing. In vitro tests for specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) [such as radioallergosorbent test (RAST), paper radioimmunosorbent test (PRIST)] will not be allowed as a diagnosis of AR.
- A female subject is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant [as confirmed by a negative urine (preferred) or serum human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) test], not lactating, and at least one of the following conditions applies: (a) Non-reproductive potential defined as premenopausal females with a documented tubal ligation or documented hysteroscopic tubal occlusion procedure with follow-up confirmation of bilateral tubal occlusion or hysterectomy or documented bilateral oophorectomy; or postmenopausal defined as 12 months of spontaneous amenorrhea. Females on hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and whose menopausal status is in doubt will be required to use one of the highly effective contraception methods if they wish to continue their HRT during the study. Otherwise, they must discontinue HRT to allow confirmation of post-menopausal status prior to study enrolment. (b) Reproductive potential and agrees to follow one of the options listed below in the GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) modified list of highly effective methods for avoiding pregnancy in females of reproductive potential (FRP) requirements from 30 days prior to the first dose of study medication and until at least 4 days after the last dose of study medication. The GSK modified list of highly effective methods includes: contraceptive subdermal implant that meets the standard operating procedure (SOP) effectiveness criteria including a <1% rate of failure per year, as stated in the product label; Intrauterine device or intrauterine system that meets the SOP effectiveness criteria including a <1% rate of failure per year, as stated in the product label; Oral contraceptive; either combined or progestogen alone; Injectable progestogen; Contraceptive vaginal ring; Percutaneous contraceptive patches; Male partner sterilization with documentation of azoospermia prior to the female subject's entry into the study, and this male is the sole partner for that subject. This list does not apply to FRP with same sex partners, when this is their preferred and usual lifestyle or for subjects who are and will continue to be abstinent from penile-vaginal intercourse on a long term and persistent basis.
- A male subject is eligible to participate if (a) subjects with female partners of child bearing potential comply with the following contraception requirements from the time of first dose of study medication until at least 4 days after the last dose of study medication; (b) Vasectomy with documentation of azoospermia; (c) Male condom plus partner use of one of the contraceptive options: Contraceptive subdermal implant that meets the SOP effectiveness criteria including a <1% rate of failure per year, as stated in the product label; Intrauterine device or intrauterine system that meets the SOP effectiveness criteria including a <1% rate of failure per year, as stated in the product label; Oral contraceptive, either combined or progestogen alone, Injectable progestogen; Contraceptive vaginal ring; Percutaneous contraceptive patches. These allowed methods of contraception are only effective when used consistently, correctly and in accordance with the product label. The investigator is responsible for ensuring that subjects understand how to properly use these methods of contraception.
- Understanding of questionnaires: In the opinion of the investigator, subject possesses a degree of understanding of the written questionnaires that enables the subject to complete study participation.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Concurrent conditions / Medical History: Concomitant medical conditions defined as but not limited to a historical or current evidence of clinically significant uncontrolled disease of any body system (e.g., tuberculosis, psychological disorders, eczema, uncontrolled diabetes, immunosuppression). Significant is defined as any disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, would put the safety of the subject at risk through study participation, or compromise the scientific validity of the study; A respiratory infection at time of study participation; A condition associated with anosmia (loss of smell) and ageusia (loss of taste) within 2 weeks of study - may be self-reported condition experienced by the subject; Clinical evidence of a Candida infection of the nose or oropharynx; Acute rhinosinusitis within 60 days of screening; Current severe physical obstruction of the nose (e.g., deviated septum or nasal polyp) or nasal septal perforation or nasal trauma or nasal ulcers; History of haemorrhagic diathesis, atrophic rhinitis, or recurrent nasal bleeding which may, in the opinion of the investigator, impact on the safety of the subject or the scientific validity of the study; Nasal biopsy within 60 days of screening; Nasal jewellery or piercings which could impact nasal safety or airway resistance; Rhinitis medicamentosa within 60 days of screening; History of glaucoma, cataracts or raised intraocular pressure.
- Concomitant medications: Use of intranasal corticosteroids (FF, MF or others) within 4 weeks of study participation; Recent or ongoing use of a corticosteroid by a non-nasal route which, in the opinion of the investigator, could preclude subject participation in the study; Use of intranasal medications (including intranasal antihistamines, intranasal decongestants, intranasal saline) within 1 week of study participation; Use of medications which, in the opinion of the investigator, could disturb the taste or smell faculties of the subject; Use of any medications that significantly inhibit the cytochrome P450 (CYP) sub-family CYP3A4, including but not limited to ritonavir and ketoconazole, within 4 weeks of study participation.
- Relevant habits: Use of perfume or strong-smelling cosmetic products or oral rinse or similar products on the study day that could, in the opinion of the investigator, compromise participation in the study. Subjects should be notified of this criterion prior to study participation; Use of tobacco, or inhaled or oral nicotine-containing products, is not allowed for 12 hours prior to the start of dosing.
- Contraindications: History of sensitivity to any of the study procedures or medications, or components thereof, or a history of drug or other allergy that, in the opinion of the investigator or Medical Monitor, contraindicates their participation.
- Diagnostic assessments and other criteria: Positive pregnancy test or female who is breastfeeding; The subject has participated in a clinical trial and has received an investigational product within the following time period prior to the first dosing day in the current study: 30 days, 5 half-lives or twice the duration of the biological effect of the investigational product (whichever is longer), unless more stringent local guidelines need to be followed.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| FF nasal sprayFF as a suspension for intranasal inhalation with unit dose strength of 27.5 mcg per dose x 4 doses (total dose 110 mcg) administered via a metered side-actuated nasal spray device. | Drug | Fluticasone Furoate |
| MF nasal sprayMF as a suspension for intranasal inhalation with unit dose strength of 50 mcg per dose x 4 doses (total dose 200 mcg) administered via a metered top-actuated nasal spray device. | Drug | Mometasone Furoate |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Overall Preference for Nasal Spray Assessed by Preference Questionnaire.
Time frame: Approximately four minutes after the administration of the second treatment
An overall preference questionnaire (OPQ) was used to evaluate participants' preference for nasal spray therapy for the given treatments. OPQ allows the responder three options, based on products attributes, i.e. preference for product 1; preference for product 2 and no preference. The OPQ was completed by each participant approximately 4 minutes after administration of the second treatment in Period 2. Overall participant preferences were analyzed using Prescott's test, as approximated by a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test, adjusted for country and symptomatology. All preference p-values were also adjusted for multiplicity using Hochberg's method.
22 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants With Preference for Individual Nasal Spray Attributes Assessed by Preference Questionnaire
Time frame: Approximately four minutes after the administration of the second treatment
Number of Participants Responding to the Immediate Attributes Question Regarding Scent/Odor
Time frame: Immediately following each treatment in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Immediate Attributes Question Regarding Satisfaction With Scent/Odor
Time frame: Immediately following each treatment in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Immediate Attributes Question Regarding Satisfaction Not to Have Scent/Odor
Time frame: Immediately following each treatment in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Immediate Attributes Question Regarding Immediate Taste.
Time frame: Immediately following each treatment in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Immediate Attributes Question Regarding Satisfaction With Immediate Taste.
Time frame: Immediately following each treatment in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Immediate Attributes Question Regarding Medicine Running Down Throat
Time frame: Immediately following each treatment in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Immediate Attributes Question Regarding Medicine Running Out of Nose.
Time frame: Immediately following each treatment in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Immediate Attributes Question Regarding Soothing
Time frame: Immediately following each treatment in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Immediate Attributes Question Regarding Sneezing
Time frame: Immediately following each treatment in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Delayed Attributes Question Regarding Scent/Odor.
Time frame: Approximatly two minutes after the dosing in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Delayed Attributes Question Regarding Satisfaction With Scent/Odor.
Time frame: Approximatly two minutes after the dosing in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Delayed Attributes Question Regarding Satisfaction Not to Have Scent/Odor.
Time frame: Approximatly two minutes after the dosing in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Delayed Attributes Question Regarding Aftertaste.
Time frame: Approximatly two minutes after the dosing in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Delayed Attributes Question Regarding Satisfaction With Aftertaste.
Time frame: Approximatly two minutes after the dosing in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Delayed Attributes Question Regarding Medicine Running Down Throat.
Time frame: Approximatly two minutes after the dosing in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Delayed Attributes Question Regarding Smedicine Running Out of Nose.
Time frame: Approximatly two minutes after the dosing in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Delayed Attributes Question Regarding Soothing.
Time frame: Approximatly two minutes after the dosing in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Delayed Attributes Question Regarding Nasal Irritation.
Time frame: Approximatly two minutes after the dosing in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Delayed Attributes Question Regarding Bothersome Nasal Irritation.
Time frame: Approximatly two minutes after the dosing in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Delayed Attributes Question Regarding Satisfaction With Product.
Time frame: Approximatly two minutes after the dosing in Period 1 and 2
Number of Participants Responding to the Delayed Attributes Question Regarding Likeliness to Comply if Prescribed
Time frame: Approximatly two minutes after the dosing in Period 1 and 2
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Jan 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 16086602Meltzer EO, Bardelas J, Goldsobel A, Kaiser H. A preference evaluation study comparing the sensory attributes of mometasone furoate and fluticasone propionate nasal sprays by patients with allergic rhinitis. Treat Respir Med. 2005;4(4):289-96. doi: 10.2165/00151829-200504040-00007.
- Background: PubMed 18343265Meltzer EO, Stahlman JE, Leflein J, Meltzer S, Lim J, Dalal AA, Prillaman BA, Philpot EE. Preferences of adult patients with allergic rhinitis for the sensory attributes of fluticasone furoate versus fluticasone propionate nasal sprays: a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, single-dose, crossover study. Clin Ther. 2008 Feb;30(2):271-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.02.005.
- Background: PubMed 24433594Sher ER, Ross JA. Intranasal corticosteroids: the role of patient preference and satisfaction. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2014 Jan-Feb;35(1):24-33. doi: 10.2500/aap.2014.35.3725.
- Researchers can use this site to request access to anonymised patient level data and/or supporting documents from clinical studies to conduct further research.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Related trials for Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial and Seasonal
RecruitingObservational study
Identification of B Regulatory Cells by Flow Cytometry
Pollen Allergy, Venom Allergy
RecruitingObservational study
The Role of the Nasal Allergen Provocation Test in Starting and Monitoring Allergen Immunotherapy
Perennial Allergic Rhinitis, Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Tyrosine Allergoid Paediatric and Adult Study
Allergic Rhinitis Due to Pollen, Allergic Conjunctivitis
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Tezepelumab in Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Study (TEZARS)
Asthma With Allergic Rhinitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials study director
GlaxoSmithKline
12 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing FF nasal spray and MF nasal spray in people with Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial and Seasonal, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 12 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jan 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 12 sites in Argentina, Australia, South Korea, Russia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Feb 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Overall Preference for Nasal Spray Assessed by Preference Questionnaire. (time frame: Approximately four minutes after the administration of the second treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02397915, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jan 2018.